You cannot conduct a war without innocent people being killed.
Is this thread just about the ratio not being good, or is it anti-war? If the former, then was is an acceptable ratio or reason, and why isn't Obama's cold calculus right? If the latter, then I think it isn't about whether or not a drone did it.
As far as military considerations allow, each Party to the conflict shall facilitate the steps taken to search for the killed and wounded, to assist the shipwrecked and other persons exposed to grave danger, and to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment.
The [Sky Raider] drone, he adds, was also referred to as “Sky Raper,” for a simple reason – “because it killed a lot of people.” When operators were assigned to “Sky Raper,” he adds, it meant that “somebody was going to die. It was always set to the most high-priority missions.”
« Older With recognition software making the use of recycl... | Deklarasyon Endepandans Ayiti:... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt