Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the senior Justice in what we often think of as the Court’s more liberal wing, wrote the primary dissent on behalf of that group, which also includes Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Despite the Court’s efforts to portray its decision as a narrow one, Ginsburg characterized the majority’s opinion as one of “startling breadth” that would allow corporations “to opt out of any law . . . they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.” And she paints a very different picture of the scope of RFRA than the majority; in her view, Congress enacted the law with the much more limited purpose of restoring the state of play as it existed before the 1990 decision that prompted Congress to pass RFRA in the first place. Congress did not mean to provide corporations with a religious exemption from laws that apply to everyone, which the Court had never done before RFRA. That would have been a huge change from the Court’s earlier cases, Ginsburg emphasized, so there is no chance that Congress would have made that change without explicitly saying so. With its decision today, Ginsburg warns ominously, the Court has “ventured into a minefield.”
Are you familiar with the story of Ananias and Sapphira?
Then tell me, was it by God's will or by Peter's that they were struck dead for their dishonesty?
By God's will.
So you propose that God, who would not permit a lie to exist among his flock, would permit the workings of witchcraft, of communion with the devil himself?
God is showing his mercy.
(pointing at chairs meant
to represent the children
tortured by witchcraft)
It is a strange sort of mercy, that would torture these poor children so.
I only wish Father Bob was still alive because I’d like to know what he thought of all the holy rollers, encouraged by a Supreme Court that’s a little slow on this separation of church and state stuff, who are swanning around, dressed in a cloak of bigotry they refer to as religious freedom.
Would Jesus really have a problem with a gay kid going to, or a gay person working at, Gordon College?
Several major gay rights groups withdrew support Tuesday for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act that would bolster gay and transgender rights in the workplace, saying they fear that broad religious exemptions included in the current bill might compel private companies to begin citing objections similar to those that prevailed in a U.S. Supreme Court case last week.
« Older In the July issue of The Monthly, John van Tiggele... | Journal of Art in Society tell... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt