Both blondes and brunettes are entirely feminine, but blondes are ultra-feminine. Blondes are softer and more yielding, physically and psychologically. Some of them are pert and scatterbrained, while others are smart but sweet and shy. They are considered to be far more ethereal and closer to the divine. For this reason brunettes cherish and protect them -- the ideal of chivalry is very important to Aristasian brunettes. Brunettes are stronger, both physically and psychologically, and braver and more practical. One might say that brunettes are the dominant sex, but blondes the superior sex.I think I'll pass, thanks.
« Older Jazzercise Eats Its Words after being accused of w... | ixi software is a network of e... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
On the other hand, it’s a little troubling in its extreme authoritarianism. The philosophy behind it is diametrically opposed to the individualism that’s so popular in America. The inventors (inventrices?) of Aristasia have pointed out that their outlook is pretty uniquely British, so maybe it’s beyond me as an American to grasp their point entirely? I don’t know.
It’s really a fascinating little universe they have created. I find myself doubting that it can hold much interest for men though, since it’s so completely and deliberately geared toward a feminine model.
posted by Fenriss at 7:52 AM on May 8, 2002