Respondent contends that it has never sought to sell the disputed domain name, and has refused to sell it to Complainant each time it has made an offer to purchase it. Respondent further contends that its listing of the disputed domain name at an auction site was due to Respondent’s “testing of the database of the service that posted names for sale”, and that Respondent has no real intention of selling the domain name at issue.
« Older Lane Splitting 101.... | Visual Thinking:
Sketchbooks... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt