Impeachment is a constitutional remedy addressed to serious offenses against the system of government [my emphasis]...While it may be argued that some articles of impeachment have charged conduct that constituted crime and thus that criminality is an essential ingredient, or that some have charged conduct that was not criminal and thus that criminality is not essential, the fact remains that in the English practice and in several of the American impeachments the criminality issue was not raised at all. The emphasis has been on the significant effects of the conduct--undermining the integrity of office, disregard of constitutional duties and oath of office, arrogation of power, abuse of the governmental process, adverse impact on the system of government. Clearly, these effects can be brought about in ways not anticipated by the criminal law. Criminal standards and criminal courts were established to control individual conduct.
Lying in a court of law in the United States of America isn't a crime against the state? What under your analysis would be then?
Not all presidential misconduct is sufficient to constitute grounds for impeachment...Because impeachment of a President is a grave step for the nation, it is predicated only upon conduct seriously incompatible with either the constitutional form and principles of our government or the proper performance of constitutional duties of the presidential office.
« Older German Anti-Semitism | Munchies Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments