MTV gets cold feet, or does it?
May 27, 2004 3:57 AM Subscribe
This turns into one of those cases where researching a story gets weirder. The documentary Super Size Me
centers on a documentary filmmaker's 30 day experience eating nothing but McDonalds. The film is doing amazingly well
as a limited release documentary grossing more per screen than high-budget Troy. Here is the weird part, Reuters has picked up
on a distributor press release claiming that MTV is refusing to air advertising for Super Size Me
because the film is "disparaging to fast-food restaurants". The Reuters short seems to have quite a bit of legs. However a Hollywood Reporter article
details MTVs side of the story placing the blame on the film's distributor. Is this really a case of a network getting cold feet? Or is it a case of distributor trying to pull the "too edgy for MTV" moneymaking ploy? And what is with the continually morphing Reuters clip that is just now being tossed onto doorsteps and stuffed into newsboxes across North America? (The film was previously discussed on metafilter back in January.
posted by KirkJobSluder (23 comments total)
« Older Racial Slurs... | American cult actor is an Afgh... Newer »