Skip

Baby Toupee
September 27, 2006 11:39 AM   Subscribe

Baby Toupee - because parents care about prematernal hair loss.
posted by triv (20 comments total)

 
Prematernal? What's that?
posted by bim at 11:44 AM on September 27, 2006


If you read the 'About Us' section, you'll see that the company isn't concerned - nor do they think parents are - about 'prematernal hair loss.'

The company’s goal is to bring creative and fun products to market that make parenting a little more fun, all while bringing a smile to the face of their children. Life is too short to take seriously… have fun with your baby!

posted by NationalKato at 11:45 AM on September 27, 2006


strangely, also available as a fake advertisement on SNL
posted by mcstayinskool at 11:53 AM on September 27, 2006


bim/NationalKato - I made the word up. I was freestyling on the nature of the piece.
posted by triv at 11:53 AM on September 27, 2006


I'm saying that prematernal isn't even a word, dude. I've heard of prenatal but prematernal doesn't even make sense.

Why not just say: Baby Toupee -- silly but cute pics of kids?
posted by bim at 11:53 AM on September 27, 2006


maternal: in reference to the mother or the state of being a mother
premateral: in reference to state before becoming a mother.
posted by blue_beetle at 11:57 AM on September 27, 2006


Started looking for quotes from "Designing Women" about baby wigs. Got bogged down here. Took a while to come back up for air.
posted by hermitosis at 12:34 PM on September 27, 2006


This is pretty cool. :)

My daughter (3 mos) is taking after her mother who was very slow to grow hair. Not that I am worried about it (she's cute as all hell), but it's still funny to think about putting on her head.
posted by Kickstart70 at 12:37 PM on September 27, 2006


You know, I'm not usually one to say anything, but there's been an awful lot of MeFi/Fark overlap lately. Single-link post to something posted on Fark yesterday? Meh.
posted by jennaratrix at 12:40 PM on September 27, 2006


I loved The Donald as seen in the gallery. But $25? Nuh-uh.
posted by diastematic at 12:42 PM on September 27, 2006


So that's what Tomkat's kid was wearing...
posted by porpoise at 12:43 PM on September 27, 2006


Suri is modeling the "Robert Smith."
posted by maryh at 12:54 PM on September 27, 2006


What, they were having trouble making play dates for these kids? Post-natal drip here needs a spark of confidence? Brilliant. Just wait till junior coughs up a hairball.
posted by hal9k at 1:07 PM on September 27, 2006


This is like dressing up dogs, but sillier...
posted by jpburns at 1:49 PM on September 27, 2006


Don't let this:

happen to your little bundle of joy.
posted by gigawhat? at 2:22 PM on September 27, 2006


What the Fish from Barney Miller look doesn't do it for you? Come on.
posted by diastematic at 2:28 PM on September 27, 2006


the dreads are kind of disgusting
posted by 2sheets at 2:41 PM on September 27, 2006


Funny, I had thought of this as a goofy idea a while back, thought it was novel, only to be beat down to reality by a googling.

I promptly removed the idea and subsequent sketches for it had been "done."

I wonder how their business will do.

Where is the Einstein?
posted by RubberHen at 3:07 PM on September 27, 2006 [1 favorite]


Mr. T?
posted by ColdChef at 6:43 PM on September 27, 2006


Sweet Babies, but a really silly idea. $24,99 - outch.
posted by nea7 at 12:31 AM on September 29, 2006


« Older Shadow People   |   Copyright Jungle Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments



Post