SubscribeOne former employee said he was told by a Disney friend that scrutiny of Miracle Studios’ activities had reached the vice presidential level. They presumed Disney was waiting to see if Hignite turned a profit before its copyright beagles pounced on him in earnest.Why sue him in production when he can either a) hang himself or b) make a ton of money which he can then pay to you when you sue him for infringement?
BITS shows that 66 percent of new employers survive two years or more, 50 percent survive four years or more, and 40 percent survive six years or more (see Appendix). These results are strikingly similar to findings from Phillips and Kirchhoff showing about three-quarters of all businesses surviving two years or more, about half surviving four years or more, and about 40 percent surviving six years or more.Thus, about 25-35% of new businesses fail within their first two years, 50% within four years, and 60% within six years. Success factors include: financing, industry, location, employer, homebased, owners, and the firm's age. The business owners' gender, race, age, education, reasons for starting, and previous experience were also studied, but their personal religious beliefs — or the lack thereof — were not.
...a bizarre style that may doom his empire.Ad nauseum. Perhaps Milwaukee Magazine's hubrisitic slogan should be "200,000 readers can't be wronged."
...countrified manor...
...for glory is not without its costs...
...he had created something, well, heavenly.
...the illustriously named Grand Bay.
Want more?
More Still?
...cedar-and-stone cathedral...
...mausoleum of stuffed animals...
The claim of godliness...
...yet another outlandish project...
...land...purchased on the cheap...
...ever-growing empire...
...an almost child-like certainty...
...His soothing contralto made everything sound as if he were reciting a bedtime story, as though the real world was barely connected to the dreams he was weaving. [My personal favorite.]
Walt Disney was always--and I do mean always--in dire financial straits until the opening of Disneyland. The primary reason wasn't that his cartoons weren't making money, because they were--at least until the war in Europe when the loss of that market meant disaster for the features. But even as they were making money, the studio was losing money because Walt was constitutionally incapable of cutting corners, enforcing economies, laying off staff. The only thing about which Walt Disney cared was quality. He thought that quality was the way to maintain his preeminence, though quality also had the psychological advantage of letting him perfect his world. The problem was that quality was expensive. To cite just one example, Walt spent more than a hundred thousand dollars setting up a training program for would-be animators, though even then the return was small because Walt was so picky that very few of the candidates actually qualified to work at the studio. Money meant very little to Walt Disney. It was only a means to an end, never an end in itself.Evidently, Walt was too nice of a guy. He had a unique ability to motivate his craftspeople to create beautiful, appealing, and commercially successful films. Sometimes the Magic worked, and sometimes it didn't. As a company, Disney's persistence succeeded, but they have laid off (and continue to lay off) hundreds of animators. Is that because few things in life are certain, or because the Mouse is a louse?
« Older On December 5th, a Croatian man named Nico awoke t... | The Central City... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by maryh at 4:05 AM on December 10, 2006