Hah! I read that the post was about pencil art and thought: "awesome, i love pencil art." No surprise that the two prior pencil art links you ref'd are me... posted by jonson at 2:20 PM on December 10, 2006
JWright will you please explain to me what is interesting about photo-realistic graphite renderings? Why doesn't Ryan Jacque just take a camera out in to nature? He'd come back with the same type of image.
Also, where you aware that none of the linked works are drawings before you posted a link to your favorite anal retentive pencil jockey? posted by subtle_squid at 7:16 PM on December 10, 2006
(Also, tickingclock, those carvings appear in one of the previous posts from jonson.) posted by Partial Law at 10:35 AM on December 11, 2006
Not so subtle there, squiddy. Is that jealously or just a complete disconnect from what human beings are supposed to be capable of?
If I have to explain it to you, then you'll never get it. Do you think the Mona Lisa (to name a work you're likely familiar with) would have been a wasted effort had a camera been available?
Regardless, yeah, I looked at the "pencil art" and wasn't terribly impressed. I think some of it is a little bit neat, but it made me think of Ryan's work, and so I posted it.
To me, any one of us on a clever-feeling day could have glued a bunch of pencils together in an interesting pattern. But none of us could ever match work like Ryan's. In my opinion, that puts the 3D Pencil Art in perspective, even though it only shares a name in a toungue-in-cheek kind of way. posted by JWright at 10:38 PM on December 11, 2006
So, its good because its hard to do? posted by subtle_squid at 7:10 AM on December 12, 2006
« Older
Where did your ancestors live in 1840? 1880? 1920?...
| Watch Even Moglen's 2006 Keyno...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
(Cool sculptures though.)
posted by public at 1:32 PM on December 10, 2006