Join 3,512 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)


CGI 9/11 Erotica
August 7, 2007 11:48 PM   Subscribe

Rule 34 is alive and well. Latest example: 9/11 Terror Porn. [NSFW, requires login and as always via]
posted by PostIronyIsNotaMyth (71 comments total) 4 users marked this as a favorite

 
Oops. Here is the permalink to BoingBoing.
posted by PostIronyIsNotaMyth at 11:55 PM on August 7, 2007


XeniFilter
posted by Poolio at 12:00 AM on August 8, 2007


It's NSFW and requires a login.

Best of the web?
posted by cedar at 12:03 AM on August 8, 2007


I'd hit it.
posted by mazola at 12:10 AM on August 8, 2007 [5 favorites]


I'd hit it.

golf clap
posted by Poolio at 12:14 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


WHAT
posted by tehloki at 12:20 AM on August 8, 2007


I bet a friend in 1992 that he couldn't find slug fetishist porn on the Internet. You just reminded me that he owes me lunch. (still no slug porn on the Internet)
posted by BrotherCaine at 12:22 AM on August 8, 2007


Wrong.
posted by IronLizard at 12:24 AM on August 8, 2007 [7 favorites]


Obscenity: I know it when I see it.
posted by frobozz at 12:24 AM on August 8, 2007


It's hard to claim that something is actually not on the internet (especially if it's pornographic), seeing as, well, you know. 4chan.
posted by tehloki at 12:24 AM on August 8, 2007


Any more for you, or was that enough?
posted by IronLizard at 12:25 AM on August 8, 2007 [6 favorites]


I recommend you spend your 9mins 51secs doing anything else. Moderate and staccato lesbian porn images are projected onto NYC buildings with highly stylised 911 impact footage (making fireballs look like dadaesque blood shards) and is followed by many more planes and impacts than we were ever told about. It is weird in a hardly at all exciting and decidedly indulgent fashion and not even worth a look. Truly. And you will want to jam chopsticks in your ears from the soundtrack.
posted by peacay at 12:31 AM on August 8, 2007 [2 favorites]


is followed by many more planes and impacts than we were ever told about.

Exactly! Not even Loose Change has the balls to go where this film goes.
posted by PostIronyIsNotaMyth at 12:33 AM on August 8, 2007 [3 favorites]


Seems to be FRENCH???

lol freedom fap.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 12:39 AM on August 8, 2007


Ya know, I'll go out on a limb and try to defend the lesbians-projected-onto-buildings stuff. In a symbolic way, that's kind of how the 9/11 hijackers saw the city, just multiple concrete phalluses of American (and probably Jewish) concupiscence.

But I'll step off of that limb now. Thank you for your time.
posted by bardic at 12:44 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


I can't get enough of that slug sex, especially when it ends with a crunch.
posted by tellurian at 12:46 AM on August 8, 2007 [3 favorites]


This was pretty interesting — almost po-mo porn. Phallic towers hardened with plastic lesbian sex, exploding in red orgasms while Lady Liberty looks on with a steely, quiet gaze.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 1:09 AM on August 8, 2007


fuck you slug linkers. you owe me a nights sleep
posted by Brainy at 1:18 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


69/11?
posted by rhymer at 1:27 AM on August 8, 2007 [2 favorites]


I thought this was interesting.
posted by srboisvert at 1:39 AM on August 8, 2007


fuck you slug linkers. you owe me a nights sleep

Don't blame us for your dangerously impulsive curiosity. You know it killed the cat, right?
posted by IronLizard at 1:41 AM on August 8, 2007


Osama Bin Laden just flew a 747 full of suck into my porn.
posted by Astro Zombie at 2:21 AM on August 8, 2007 [2 favorites]


Gorgeous, but they failed horribly if what's written in the about section of their website was their intent.
posted by brundlefly at 2:23 AM on August 8, 2007


Well, that was weird.
posted by zardoz at 2:43 AM on August 8, 2007


I'm a little surprised that there weren't animated cocks on the planes that flew into the buildings. I thought that was going to be the theme.
posted by BrotherCaine at 2:49 AM on August 8, 2007


"Best of the web?"

Yes. A rare example of a YouTube MeFi FPP that I think is worth it, not some hamfisted "look, a bunch of my favourite stuff is on YouTube".

This fits no definition of porn that I am aware of.
posted by nthdegx at 3:11 AM on August 8, 2007


"The endless replays of the plane penetrating the tower were unmistakably pornographic, complete with flames and debris spurting out in slow motion; even the Washington Post referred to the footage as a "money shot" and called it "our new porn" [12/31/2001, Page C1]. The towers were blatantly phallic, and their collapses resembled post-ejaculatory loss of erection."

Reverend Korda of the Church of Euthanasia in an interview by Marshall Dury for The Maine Campus (University of Maine). Link to the full interview. He made a video that mashes up pornographic imagery with the 9/11 footage some time ago, here's a link to the video "I like to watch" by the Rev. Korda
posted by Glow Bucket at 3:15 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


It's like a glossy daytime Akira. I enjoyed that. Yet, I am also a little scared deep down.
posted by saturnine at 3:45 AM on August 8, 2007


It would've been better if Ron Jeremey played Guiliani. Or OBL.
posted by DenOfSizer at 3:56 AM on August 8, 2007


fuck you slug linkers

Fuck you too.
[wait. nevermind.]
posted by sluglicker at 3:58 AM on August 8, 2007 [8 favorites]


Seems to be FRENCH???

C'est à dire, escargoatse.
posted by rob511 at 4:14 AM on August 8, 2007 [4 favorites]


In 1992, slug porn on the Internet would have had to be text-only anyway. And slugs can't read!
posted by DU at 4:43 AM on August 8, 2007


This ain't porn, and I know porn.
posted by mattoxic at 5:02 AM on August 8, 2007


I move to establish a distinction between the potential validities (and hence prospective devolutions) of the hardcore and softcore applicability of Rule 34.
posted by rudster at 5:03 AM on August 8, 2007


Any chance of getting some slug on slug action involving balloons?
posted by Pollomacho at 5:09 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


That was...disturbing. Too simple, and went on for too long, but disturbing.
posted by mediareport at 5:43 AM on August 8, 2007


That second slug link is amazing!

So what is so interesting about banana slugs!? Well, these slugs are hermaphrodites, which means that they can act as both males and females at the same time. When they mate, they insert their penises into eachother at the same time. The unusual thing (in case you don't find that unusual enough!) is that sometimes, but not always, when they finish mating one slug will chew the penis completely off the other, a process called Apophallation. Sometimes it happens that both slugs engage in chewing so that at the end of the mating encounter, both slugs are penis-less.

Does it grow back? Probably the most common question that I get. NO. Past work has suggested that it does not regenerate, at least not within a year.

posted by kisch mokusch at 6:07 AM on August 8, 2007


Did anyone notice - just before the second plane hit - a shot of jizz shoot from its cockpit?
posted by strawberryviagra at 6:15 AM on August 8, 2007


"Then, suddenly, the pair release their hold on the branch and start to slide downwards on a rope of mucus..."
posted by pracowity at 6:23 AM on August 8, 2007


Did anyone notice - just before the second plane hit - a shot of jizz shoot from its cockpit?

Don't ask me. I'm just here for the slug porn.
posted by maudlin at 6:40 AM on August 8, 2007


(NSFW)

Is it a bad thing that I've been on the internet long enough to know where to find slug porn with an intended audience of humans? One image at here, two at here, and a number at here's subpages, including here... at another site, you can find one image each at here, here, and here... here is a snail-girl, rather than slug-girl, but still fairly close... hm, here used to have some, but doesn't at the moment... And yes, I could almost certainly find more if I used Google to look for anything but the specific sub-pages on the sites I knew of. (Warning - all links are not just NSFW, but may introduce you to things you didn't know existed, let alone that Rule 34 could apply to.)
posted by DataPacRat at 7:06 AM on August 8, 2007 [5 favorites]


I was very intrigued by this. It was like a visual re-enactment of a chapter from a Steve Erickson book. Thank you!
posted by hermitosis at 7:11 AM on August 8, 2007


I came here for the terror porn, I stayed for the slugs.
posted by schroedinger at 7:11 AM on August 8, 2007


Why are those lesbians so afraid of the cock?
posted by gorgor_balabala at 7:28 AM on August 8, 2007


slug porn with an intended audience of humans

as opposed to ???
posted by desjardins at 7:43 AM on August 8, 2007


Worst porn ever. Not the banana slug porn though; that is hot.
posted by Mister_A at 7:46 AM on August 8, 2007


Rule 34 for should be "Rule 34: The J.G. Ballard Rule"
posted by drezdn at 7:48 AM on August 8, 2007


for
posted by drezdn at 7:48 AM on August 8, 2007


Since when is a couple of ladies licking each other's nipples considered porn?
posted by Burhanistan at 7:49 AM on August 8, 2007


Yeah. I think that Rule 34 totally works as long as you have a really really broad concept of what counts as pornography.

This is a short film using semi-explicit sexual imagery for artistic effect. Tipper Gore would think it's porn, but that doesn't mean it is.
posted by hermitosis at 8:14 AM on August 8, 2007


Thanks to Metafilter, I have just spent my precious morning pre-work minutes watching a video of a slug chewing off its friend's penis. Thank you, Mefi!
posted by jokeefe at 8:19 AM on August 8, 2007


Actually the original link (not the slugs), seems to be a badly realized take on what is actually an interesting idea (though not a novel one).
posted by jokeefe at 8:33 AM on August 8, 2007


Ideal viewing for anyone who is still entranced by the deep and meaningful significance of Pink Floyd: The Wall.
posted by nanojath at 9:04 AM on August 8, 2007


But is it ART?
posted by Krrrlson at 9:14 AM on August 8, 2007


MetaFilter: Like 4chan, but... well, like 4chan.
posted by Aversion Therapy at 9:30 AM on August 8, 2007


I saw this screened at resfest in new york very close to the 5th anniversary of 911...let's just say that there were several people in attendance that did not appreciate this 'film'...what a piece of crap regardless of subject matter...the music is hideous too...
posted by mrblack at 10:01 AM on August 8, 2007


I'll not follow any links for I am at work, but I love the idea of 'Rule 34'. I had not heard of that before, but I'm sure I'll use it in the future.

See, what's really cool about pornography, if you think for a second, in that little triple-ply steel vault that you keep in the center on your brain, where you keep locked away that really fucked up sexual fantasy, that really dark twisted sticky exotic thing...

Are you locked on it right now, are you fixed on it? Right now, there's a magazine devoted just to that! That's all it is! And there's a staff of people putting it out, that couldn't be more bored by the thing you think is so exotic and weird! The thing you think is so dangerous is somebody's pain in the ass job somewhere. That is amazing!


-Patton Oswalt
posted by quin at 10:28 AM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


The thing you think is so dangerous is somebody's pain in the ass job somewhere.

Strangely, this completely makes sense. Of course my secret vault fantasy involves placing large objects in someone's rectum, so...
posted by Pollomacho at 11:20 AM on August 8, 2007


Filmmakers like this are the reason why towards the end of his career, Freud kinda wished he'd just stayed in bed.

Finally, am I the only one who was reminded of that one Roadrunner cartoon, where Wile E. Coyote made those little dynamite glider darts that invariably backfired and fucked with him for the rest of the episode? Anyone? ok.
posted by Uther Bentrazor at 12:37 PM on August 8, 2007


Finally, am I the only one who was reminded of that one Roadrunner cartoon, where Wile E. Coyote made those little dynamite glider darts that invariably backfired and fucked with him for the rest of the episode?

I wasn't thinking about it earlier, but that is kind of a nice metaphor for the US aiding mujahideen groups in Afghanistan that later morphed into Al-Qaeda.
posted by Burhanistan at 12:53 PM on August 8, 2007


slug porn with an intended audience of humans

as opposed to ???


I think he meant slug porn that involves humans or anthropomorphic slugs, not just pictures of two slugs fucking.
posted by puke & cry at 1:00 PM on August 8, 2007


I think he meant slug porn that involves humans or anthropomorphic slugs, not just pictures of two slugs fucking.

Sure, man, no reason to get irate, I mean, it's your kink. Whatever float's your boat.

sicko
posted by Pollomacho at 1:06 PM on August 8, 2007


I recommend you spend your 9mins 51secs doing anything else. Moderate and staccato lesbian porn images are projected onto NYC buildings with highly stylised 911 impact footage ...
posted by peacay at 8:31 AM on August 8 [2 favorites +] [!]

Hey! A little spoiler protection next time, please :)
posted by kaemaril at 1:50 PM on August 8, 2007


Quin, thanks for the quote. That's genius.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 2:01 PM on August 8, 2007


Needs more Viagra. Lots more.
posted by tellurian at 4:09 PM on August 8, 2007


Metafilter: escargoatse
posted by phrits at 7:21 PM on August 8, 2007 [1 favorite]


Agreed.

I'm not much of a connoisseur of pornography, but I know it when I see it.

I have too much respect for the porn industry to consider this short self-titled "Flesh" as porn.

However, I don't have as much respect for the term "ART." They call Picasso and Monet "ART" and I think they're both crap.

This piece of crap film about planes being phallic symbols ramming into other phallic symbols while fake Hollywood-ized lipstick lesbians prance about on every flat surface that computer imaging can put a lesbian on, disregarding the religious, political, social, historical, and psychological implications and simplfying everything humanity has to offer as just one big festival of flesh with no meaning beyond what we choose to give it.

I'll call that art.

I won't call it porn.

Although, when you think about it, even the best of porn does much the same thing. Disregard the implications and go for the money shot. I still refuse to call it porn.
posted by ZachsMind at 7:50 PM on August 8, 2007


DataPacRat, thanks that definitely qualifies. Now I owe my buddy lunch. Actually come to think of it 1996 was when we made the bet.
posted by BrotherCaine at 8:24 PM on August 8, 2007


BrotherCaine: You're entirely welcome. Back in 1996, all I could have offered you was a single photomorph of a slug- or snail-woman, with eye-stalks sprouting from her eyesockets, which has been burned into my memory even though I can't find it online anymore. Which may be a good thing.

(I may have saved a copy to my HD, then one of my archive CD-Rs, then transferred it to my current external HD... but I think I'll just decline to search for that particular artist's works today.)
posted by DataPacRat at 9:40 PM on August 8, 2007


Bugporn! One Dollar!
posted by ZachsMind at 2:52 AM on August 9, 2007


I like to watch.
posted by vira at 7:51 AM on August 10, 2007


« Older Barry Bonds has broken the all-time record with th...  |  Underfire;... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments