dios said: What the opinion is likely to say--with Kennedy as the king-maker yet >again--is that the 2nd Amendment protects individuals' right to bear arms as a fundamental right, apart from the issue of militias. And with all fundamental rights, it can be infringed upon if the infringement passes strict scrutiny. So they will say the machine gun ban passes strict scrutiny but the DC handgun law does not.
Not to harm, this just stuns me. Seriously. Vast examples. Hell - the IRA.
« Older Remember Tang? The news from England is that the 2... | Postcards from Yo Momma.... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt