SubscribeIf abortion is, as the feminists insist, a matter of a woman having control over her own body, then I think a public demonstration of a woman willing herself to become un-pregnant or willing her fertilized egg to detach itself from her uterine wall would settle the issue once and for all. At which point I would happily go along with the secular-humanist consensus view.He's so clearly insane that his rantings fail to upset me, but I wouldn't deem him "not misogynist" simply because he's also a semi-literate lunatic. I completely lack knowledge of his work outside of this post, but I doubt that this sort of turgid haranguing can be contextualized in a way that changes his obvious sentiments.
As an example, I firmly believe that feminism is a misguided attempt to raise women above their place, which I firmly believe is secondary to that of men. I firmly believe that homosexuality – not homosexualists themselves – belongs at the margins of society and behind closed doors.
No one wants to be a woman...[t]o me, it seems less a case of penis envy (Sigmund Freud having lived in altogether too chivalrous a time period for such “plain talk” as I offer here) than it is one of vagina abhorrence from the standpoint of the “would-be tenant” in contemplating a role as “owner-proprietor”. Alas, for reasons known only to our Creator, (almost exactly) half of us come out on the losing end of the coin toss. If things seem pretty “even steven” (leaving aside the fact that a penis, self-evidently, constitutes an anatomical “presence” and a vagina, self-evidently, an anatomical “absence”) over the course of the first ten or eleven years in the life of a boy and a girl there does, alas, “come the day . . . ”
To me, taking it as a given that reason cannot prevail in any argument with emotion, there must come a point – with women and children – where verbal discipline has to be asserted, and if verbal discipline proves insufficient, that physical discipline be introduced. Women and children have soft, cushy buttocks which are, nonetheless, shot through with reasonably sensitive nerve endings. I believe that those buttocks are there for a very specific purpose intended by their Creator.
Women are evil, so they should be the people exclusively involved in childcare.I've always gotten a kick out of the way people like Sim can simultaniously think that women suck, and simultaniously think that womens hould be doing pretty much all the work in childcare. Yup, no irrationality there at all.
« Older (Big) Newsfilter: FBI Searches Office of Special C... | You know you want one. It's cl... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Artw at 12:05 PM on May 6, 2008