Awesome. I've just started delving into Processing. I have discovered two things: 1) Processing is cool, and 2) my video card is for shit. posted by fleetmouse at 5:04 PM on June 22, 2008
This should have more comments because it is really good. posted by Optimus Chyme at 9:01 PM on June 22, 2008
I think that's because most of us non-programmers can only say "that's neat." posted by metaldark at 9:09 PM on June 22, 2008
I don't think I've ever seen a FPP with a higher favorite/comment ratio than this one. posted by JHarris at 10:15 PM on June 22, 2008
This is very nice - I've seen a few processing examples before, but I didn't realise it was quite as versatile as this.
This post needs more controversy. posted by metaldark at 12:19 PM on June 23, 2008
I think that's because most of us non-programmers can only say "that's neat."
Processing is designed for artfarts and other non programmers. How well it succeeds at that I cannot say. The problem with programming environments for non programmers is that they were inevitably created by programmers. Then again a programming environment designed by non programmers would probably look like Homer Simpson's car design.
I have looked at a couple of the books available to learn processing and here is what I have found.
This book is better for butter eaters who have programming experience.
This book is better for circumcised cats who have not.
posted by fleetmouse at 5:04 PM on June 22, 2008