Reichardt revealed Wendy's backstory, completely absent from the film and better off for it, but completely plausible: "She was in Indiana and was a renter and had a house-fire and had no insurance and had to get out of the place where she was leaving." Further motivation: "That the fireman had damaged everything, so she was just sort of left with what she had, and that she had heard about people going into Alaska and working in canneries. She was probably wasn't one of the people who set out the way she set out, but she had enough gumption to try it out." Work started on the screenplay after Katrina victims too poor to flee the storm were mocked on conservative talk shows.This really does change the movie completely, and I don't agree with Vadim that it's better off not revealing it. Actually, I don't think it's really "backstory" at all -- why Wendy is going where she's going is part of the story. There are some hints in the phone call with her family, but it's not enough to judge her choices by. Umberto D. is the obvious comparison for a similar small-scale tragedy involving a dog, but that movie tells you everything you need to get emotionally involved. Wendy & Lucy is formally interesting and Williams is terrific, but the narrative felt shoddy to me. (Don't want to spoil it here, but did anybody else have problems with the aftermath of the shoplifting scene? I didn't believe that at all.)
« Older SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY! TILT SHIFT MONSTERTRUCKS! TR... | If you can type, you can make ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Also, glad to see that I'm not the only one who didn't think Speed Racer was worthless, Jürgen.
posted by Weebot at 12:21 AM on January 4, 2009