Shel didn't set out to write The Giving Tree to send a message to society, a point he continually reiterated with many of the books, songs and cartoons he would write in the future.and then
"It's about a boy and a tree," is how Shel described the book. "It has a pretty sad ending."
"It's just a relationship between two people; one gives and the other takes," he said. "I didn't start out to prove a message. It started out to be a good book for a kid. I imagine it reflects my ideas, but it is for children. I would like adults to buy and read it, and I hope they can find enough in it."
In fact, given his disgust with the me-first attitude among the folksingers and other artists in the Village who were creating art as a form of self-experiment, it almost sounds like he wrote it as an experiment, a reaction to their own mushiness. While he clearly wanted to tell a story with universal implications, he also wanted to keep it deliberately murky.
...and even when a member of the audience--who just happened to be a high school teacher who was also a nun--asked him the kind of message-behind-the-story question that he hated about The Giving Tree, he answered graciously.posted by Spatch at 9:33 AM on March 19, 2009 [1 favorite]
"What did you mean to say?" she asked.
"It's about two beings," Shel replied. "One who likes to give, and another who likes to take." All she said was, "Oh."
« Older Ken MacLeod, Paul Cornell, Iain [M] Banks and Ian ... | Today Kansas became one step c... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by sconbie at 10:29 PM on March 18, 2009