The first time you see it, yes. Every other time after that, increasingly annoying in its cutesy pointlessness. But this was lolworthy, and his SpeadTweet is also funny, so we're cool. posted by flashboy at 1:53 AM on April 15
Your favourite web browser sucks. posted by bjrn at 3:02 AM on April 15
twoleftfeet - the snakey thing on the main page is kind of annoying until you realize that it's a fully playable recreation of the "Snake" game in HTML 4 and CSS. Seriously. Start hitting arrow keys, you can control the snake. The only rule it doesn't follow is that it wraps at page top and bottom, rather than crashing. I was impressed. posted by caution live frogs at 5:24 AM on April 15 [5 favorites has favorites]
I want these motherfucking snakes off the motherfucking page!
Is this something you'd have to understand to understand it? posted by not_on_display at 6:14 AM on April 15
Describe what border-radius looks like!
Well, in Firefox it looks like this:
-moz-border-radius
In Safari it looks like this:
-webkit-border-radius
In standards-compliant browsers:
border-radius
When applying border-radius, you may feel a slight sting. That's CSS fucking with you. Fuck CSS. CSS only hurts, it never helps. posted by Civil_Disobedient at 6:25 AM on April 15 [7 favorites has favorites]
Five long years, he supported IE 6. Then when he died of dysentery, he gave me the login. I supported that uncomfortable hunk of code for two years. Then, after seven years, I was sent home to my family.
If I'm curt about your browser, it's because render time is a factor. I think fast, I surf fast, and I need this thing to load fast if you want to get out of this. So pretty please, with sugar on top, load the fucking code. posted by porn in the woods at 8:00 AM on April 15 [3 favorites has favorites]
Start hitting arrow keys, you can control the snake.
I just assumed that there was no more content when I tried to scroll using the cursors, and nothing happened. Which is a pretty poor bit of front-page usability for a hotshot web 2.0 designer. posted by Luddite at 9:02 AM on April 15 [2 favorites has favorites]
Which is a pretty poor bit of front-page usability for a hotshot web 2.0 designer.
That's funny. You used "usability" and "web 2.0" in the same sentence...and you weren't being ironic. posted by Thorzdad at 9:08 AM on April 15
Get the fuck out my face with that no-CSS shit! The motherfucker that said that shit never had to pick up itty-bitty pieces of broke-ass code on account of your dumb nonstandard ass. Well, I'm a strict-doctype-layin' motherfucker, motherfucker! Every time my fingers touch conditional comments, I'm Superfly T.N.T., I'm the Guns of the Navarone! IN FACT, WHAT THE FUCK AM I DOIN' WITH IE6 BUG FIXES? YOU'RE THE MOTHERFUCKER WHO SHOULD BE ON QA DETAIL! posted by kirkaracha at 10:17 AM on April 15 [4 favorites has favorites]
I'm not entirely sure that fucking around with CSS3 before it's finalized is really a good idea. Uniform CSS2 support is what will make me happy at the moment, CSS3 is just grandstanding and showing off. posted by Artw at 11:13 AM on April 15 [2 favorites has favorites]
So what does a guy like that make? posted by geoff. at 11:16 AM on April 15
I want you to go on del.icio.us and find that DOM reference I bookmarked.
posted by twoleftfeet at 1:03 AM on April 15