Are the folks at jezebel not familiar with a joke?Seems to me that the vast majority of the posters in the thread are joking. Well, mocking, but still...
Wow, the vitriolic rejection of what is clearly a tongue-in-cheek genderfication of cupcake design is really speaking volumes.I don't know about that. I think the reaction (well, okay, my reaction) is droll, slow-clapping amusement.
Personally, I was not aware that cupcakes were an inherently feminine snack food
And secondly, while I can understand why feminists don't like advertisements that trade on misogyny, like the Dockers ads that have been out there recently, I don't really see why it's a problem to simply target men for products. Women get products targeted towards them (either explicitly or implicitly all the time)It's not marketing to men that's an issue. It's marketing to men with the message that they'd better not like anything remotely feminine because anything related to femininity is bad. Taken straight, that is the message of the advertising here. It's not "this product is suitable for men," it's "don't worry, we took away all that horrible girliness so you won't be contaminated by it". And that is trading on misogyny, if not in the exact same way as the Dockers ads.
« Older Past solutions for The Vagrancy Problem focused on... | In 2008, Gabe Delahaye, senior... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by mudpuppie at 11:38 AM on February 18, 2010 [3 favorites]