my spouse actually thinks of donating some to an infant milk bank which could help little babies in Haiti and such but for the meantime (the milk bank requires check-ups which takes a little while) our small freezer ran out of space. To throw it out would be like wasting gold.Donating to a milk bank isn't as simple as dumping an ice chest full of baggies into a drop slot. There's screening and logging and hoops to jump through. If you haven't taken care of all that before you pump, you're probably not going to be able to donate. In this case it's not wasting milk that could have helped babies in need, it's finding a use for milk that would have gone in the trash.
And more to the point about why we aren't cannibals, there's a biological reason for this. Humans throughout history rarely ate predatory animals. We don't eat up the food chain, and we certainly don't eat apex predators. We don't eat tigers, wolves, or foxes. We don't eat hawks or eagles. We don't eat bears. We primarily eat herbivores, because predators are rife with parasites, prions, viruses, etc. from the animals they in turn consume.Tiger penis is consumed as an impotence "cure," and the meat can sometimes be found for sale in S China. Fox meat is gamy and needs to be brined overnight but there are recipes out there. Eagles were eaten enough in antiquity for the Bible to prohibit their consumption. The Ainu people of Hokkaido eat bear, and you can even buy canned bear curry there.
Recall that mad cow disease arose from cows being fed the remains of other cattle and sheep.
posted by Pastabagel at 9:40 AM
We feed pigs to pigs then cook the pigs, then use anthropomorphized cartoon pigs to sell the pig-fed pigs to us.See also: Suicide Food
The occurrence of maternal transmission is, however, not predicted by modern knowledge of the aetiology of spongiform encephalopathy, and even though claims of maternal transmission have been reiterated frequently in the literature, re-examination of the source data reveals that these data are extremely scanty, unreplicated, and probably subject to ascertainment bias. The probability of maternal transmission of spongiform encephalopathy in any species should be viewed with the greatest scepticism.posted by Blazecock Pileon at 10:03 AM on March 11, 2010
...
Belief in maternal transmission as the main mode of acquisition of natural scrapie has held sway for 30 years on the basis of poorly reported data on the occurrence of scrapie in a handful of sheep of unknown genotype. The genetic basis of spongiform encephalopathy in familial cases in humans, the absence of maternal transmission in any other form of spongiform encephalopathy, and the results of embryo transfer experiments all suggest that a genetic basis for natural sheep scrapie is compatible with our current understanding of spongiform encephalopathy. The onus should now be on those who wish to maintain the importance of maternal transmission of spongiform encephalopathy in any species to provide convincing data. (emph. added)
« Older Incredibox -- a capella beat-boxing flash toy... | Cycles. Music and animation by... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
*looks at post*
*irrationally claws at eyes*
(Great post! Wow!)
posted by cavalier at 6:12 AM on March 11, 2010