I'm a chapter into this book right now. So far it proves interesting. He writes quite well and I really had no idea how odd Hitchcock was and how much he liked feet. posted by kanata at 7:37 PM on April 1, 2010
Robert Graysmith is also the author of Zodiac, which at the time of its publication was the most detailed available book on the Zodiac Killer. It might still be, although his pet theory about the identity of the Zodiac was later disproved.
Wow. I went to buy this without pause - and then paused to read the review. Publisher's Weekly was pretty brutal. I think I'll wait and see how you folks like it before I buy it. posted by Kimothy at 12:02 AM on April 2, 2010 [1 favorite]
That was my take on it as well, Kimothy. They really hated it: "As sloppy as Hitchcock's shower scene was precise, Graysmith's jumbled account never finds its footing, despite the fascinating subject matter." posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 3:41 AM on April 2, 2010
Do we really know that the guy who did these killings was a psycho obsessed with the film? Seems like the kind of thing someone would just make up to spice up a story. posted by delmoi at 3:43 AM on April 2, 2010
Graysmith? Jumbled? The hell you say. posted by Ogre Lawless at 11:50 AM on April 2, 2010
Ugh. I retract my comment. First chapter interesting and written well as it describes the setting up and shooting of the shower scene. From there just peters out and feels like the most feeble ties ever to the movie Psycho. Just made to sell a book or get publicity. Ended up abandoning it after awhile. Subject seemed so interesting too. I guess I just need to find a good book about Hitchcock instead. posted by kanata at 5:00 AM on April 4, 2010
« Older 25 years ago this month, with a move similar to th... | Law Abiding Engineer: an acti... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by kanata at 7:37 PM on April 1, 2010