no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.And Madison's Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments.
Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects?Not to mention the good ol' Treaty of Tripoli.
Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.-- Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography, on the Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
« Older Wikipedia can be a time sink for sure, but often i... | "Whybin TBWA Australia an... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by GuyZero at 11:17 AM on April 13, 2010 [10 favorites]