"Nothing is original. Steal from anywhere that resonates with inspiration or fuels your imagination. Devour old films, new films, music, books, paintings, photographs, poems, dreams, random conversations, architecture, bridges, street signs, trees, clouds, bodies of water, light and shadows. Select only things to steal from that speak directly to your soul. If you do this, your work (and theft) will be authentic. Authenticity is invaluable; originality is non-existent. And don’t bother concealing your thievery - celebrate it if you feel like it. In any case, always remember what Jean-Luc Godard said: “It’s not where you take things from - it’s where you take them to."
"I always have about four books next to my bed that I read simultaneously. What happens is that those books — no matter what they are, poetry, science fiction, instruction manuals — always seem to comment on one another. That way you create the fifth book yourself."
Ellison has always been and always will be a hard-nose about principle, and that's why I love him. If you shoot straight with him, he'll deal with you decently. If you fuck him, watch out: he will fuck you and you will feel it. He will win. Always has, always will.
I got no problem with Ellison suing Cameron and Hemdale.
No poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance, his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and artists. You cannot value him alone; you must set him, for contrast and comparison, among the dead. I mean this as a principle of æsthetic, not merely historical, criticism. The necessity that he shall conform, that he shall cohere, is not one-sided; what happens when a new work of art is created is something that happens simultaneously to all the works of art which preceded it. The existing monuments form an ideal order among themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new (the really new) work of art among them. The existing order is complete before the new work arrives; for order to persist after the supervention of novelty, the whole existing order must be, if ever so slightly, altered; and so the relations, proportions, values of each work of art toward the whole are readjusted; and this is conformity between the old and the new. Whoever has approved this idea of order, of the form of European, of English literature, will not find it preposterous that the past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past. And the poet who is aware of this will be aware of great difficulties and responsibilities.
Tradition and the Individual Talent, by T.S. Eliot (who also said, "Mediocre writers borrow; Great writers steal.")
« Older Iftin... | SF0 is a game played in the re... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt