Judge declares terrorism detainments unconstitutional
May 6, 2002 10:44 AM Subscribe
Judge declares terrorism detainments unconstitutional (NYTimes link) - A federal judge in NY has ruled that the Justice Department abused the material witness statute when it imprisoned a Jordanian college student living in San Diego. The Justice Dept is, of course, appealing the ruling.
My bad - sorry about posting the same link twice in the space of 2 sentences. Brain fuzzy from strep medications.
That's my story, and I am sticking to it, since it lets me off the hook for poor proofreading skills.
posted by Irontom at 10:56 AM on May 6, 2002
That's my story, and I am sticking to it, since it lets me off the hook for poor proofreading skills.
posted by Irontom at 10:56 AM on May 6, 2002
*gasp*
You don't mean that the greedheads and those otherwise in power in America disregard the Constitution when it suits their purposes?
Makes you wonder why sometimes people all over the world (and in this country)
want a little higher authority to deal with some of these issues.
posted by fold_and_mutilate at 11:15 AM on May 6, 2002
You don't mean that the greedheads and those otherwise in power in America disregard the Constitution when it suits their purposes?
Makes you wonder why sometimes people all over the world (and in this country)
want a little higher authority to deal with some of these issues.
posted by fold_and_mutilate at 11:15 AM on May 6, 2002
What is the NY Times doing? This was in the Washington Post on Wednesday of last week.
posted by schlyer at 11:38 AM on May 6, 2002
posted by schlyer at 11:38 AM on May 6, 2002
It sounds like the system's working, to me. I mean, come on, the FAR REACHING AMERICAN TERROR-CREATING CONSPIRACY would be shutting up inconvenient judges like this... if it existed.
posted by darukaru at 1:37 PM on May 6, 2002
posted by darukaru at 1:37 PM on May 6, 2002
Lemme clarify, because in retrospect that sounds a little trollish. One aspect of the system goes too far; another one reins it in, actively preventing the erosion of civil liberties we worry about. Checks and balances, y'know? Sorry, foldywoldypoo, but even the money men have to listen when the courts come calling.
posted by darukaru at 3:35 PM on May 6, 2002
posted by darukaru at 3:35 PM on May 6, 2002
It sounds like the system's working
Absolutely, judicial review is one of the best (if not one of last) tools we have to protect our freedoms.
posted by Bag Man at 3:42 PM on May 6, 2002
Absolutely, judicial review is one of the best (if not one of last) tools we have to protect our freedoms.
posted by Bag Man at 3:42 PM on May 6, 2002
« Older One of science fiction's favorite dark futures | The number of kakapos in the world has risen by a... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Irontom at 10:47 AM on May 6, 2002