soul food for the coalition of the willing
March 17, 2003 4:38 PM Subscribe
mustard with your pork sir? as we head to war, here's some alarming data on america's own stash of undestroyed chemical weapons as well as the phenomenal return on investment for deep-pocket GOP campaign contributors.
Actually with the lack of criticism of the GOP in the "mainstream" media, this is one of the few places left to read it.
Thank you subpixel
posted by CrazyJub at 4:47 PM on March 17, 2003
Thank you subpixel
posted by CrazyJub at 4:47 PM on March 17, 2003
No, what we need are more Ayn Rand wannabees. Seriously though, with a name inspired by the rapee-happy Rand, you'd think you'd find the 'pork' link to be sickening - that's tax dollars at work, in case you're confused.
And the 'mustard' link? I read it as an indict of hypocrisy; I suppose if you were feeling particularly defensive, it might seem anti-GOP. Angst building? Don't worry, we're going to bomb some brown people soon; it will cheer you right up.
posted by hank_14 at 4:50 PM on March 17, 2003
And the 'mustard' link? I read it as an indict of hypocrisy; I suppose if you were feeling particularly defensive, it might seem anti-GOP. Angst building? Don't worry, we're going to bomb some brown people soon; it will cheer you right up.
posted by hank_14 at 4:50 PM on March 17, 2003
The Dems and the Repubs both like the taste of pork. The Republicans are just more outright and open in their corruption. That reminds me of a funny Barry Crimmins' quip: "There's a nickel's worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats. If you put a nickel on the table a Democrat will steal it from you and a Republican will kill you for it." [sic]
posted by letterneversent at 5:13 PM on March 17, 2003
posted by letterneversent at 5:13 PM on March 17, 2003
« Older Pain In The English | Speaking of gassing one's own people Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by H. Roark at 4:45 PM on March 17, 2003