Examining Bush's stem cell policy, two years later.
October 25, 2003 7:52 PM   Subscribe

Examining Bush's stem cell policy, two years later. Kinsley: Put it all together, and the stem cells that can squeeze through Bush's loopholes are far less promising than they seemed two years ago, while the general promise of embryonic stem cells burns brighter than ever. If you claim to have made an anguished moral decision, and the factual basis for that decision turns out to be faulty, you ought to reconsider or your claim to moral anguish looks phony. But Bush's moral anguish was suspect from the beginning, because the policy it produced makes no sense.
posted by skallas (1 comment total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: Poster's Request -- frimble

Some additional discussion here.
posted by willnot at 8:33 AM on October 26, 2003

« Older What time is it?   |   The Alice and Bob After Dinner Speech Newer »

This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments