And he notes that "the Wikipedia is far from being the only online fetish site for foolish collectivism. There's a frantic race taking place online to become the most "Meta" site, to be the highest level aggregator, subsuming the identity of all other sites".
The hive mind should be thought of as a tool. Empowering the collective does not empower individuals — just the reverse is true. There can be useful feedback loops set up between individuals and the hive mind, but the hive mind is too chaotic to be fed back into itself.
These are just a few ideas about how to train a potentially dangerous collective and not let it get out of the yard. When there’s a problem, you want it to bark but not bite you.
The illusion that what we already have is close to good enough, or that it is alive and will fix itself, is the most dangerous illusion of all. By avoiding that nonsense, it ought to be possible to find a humanistic and practical way to maximize value of the collective on the Web without turning ourselves into idiots. The best guiding principle is to always cherish individuals first.
Alan Saunders, host of the 'The Philosopher's Zone,' interviews (July 7, 2006) Jaron Lanier on ABC Radio National (Australia)< .a href="http://www.abc.net.au/rn/philosopherszone/stories/2006/1678536.htm#">>
« Older Climate change denial in Canada | Dude, you're getting a lame joke about the Dell... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments