Does it include the original secret ingredient?
"Archive director Philip Mooney told the show that many similar, if not identical, recipes have surfaced in the past that claim to be the one for what has become one of the world's best-known brands.posted by cashman at 1:52 PM on February 15, 2011
"Could it be a precursor? Yeah, absolutely," Mooney told the show. "Is this the one that went to market? I don't think so."
"Many third parties, including 'This American Life,' have tried to crack our secret formula. Try as they might, they've been unsuccessful because there is only one 'Real Thing,'" said Coca-Cola spokeswoman Kerry Tressler.This right here makes me so angry.
But does it cure morphine addiction, dyspepsia, neurasthenia, headache, and impotence?
Advertising too is a brilliant tool for creating conventional wisdom. Listerine, for instance, was invented in the nineteenth century as powerful surgical antiseptic. It was later sold, in distilled form, as both a floor cleaner and a cure for gonorrhea. But it wasn't a runaway success until the 1920s, when it was pitched as a solution for "chronic halitosis"—a then obscure medical term for bad breath. Listerine's new ads featured forlorn young women and men, eager for marriage but turned off by their mate's rotten breath. "Can I be happy with him in spite of that?" one maiden asked herself. Until that time, bad breath was not conventionally considered such a catastrophe. But Listerine changed that. As the advertising scholar James B. Twitchell writes, "Listerine did not make mouthwash as much as it made halitosis." In just seven years, the company's revenues rose from $115,000 to more than $8 million.See also Apply Listerine mouthwash to your scalp to cure dandruff!
Another fun Coke fact: New Coke was, in fact, their opportunity to switch from cane sugar to HFCS in the US recipe. One of my other customers is a sugar refinery that refines IIRC about 12% of the sugar for the entire US market, and their orders from Coca-Cola cratered with the switch and didn't recover when Classic was introduced. So it's not your imagination; Classic really isn't the same as pre-New-Coke.I've wondered about this sort of thing. It seems implausible to me that the Coke of today is the same as the Coke of 25 years ago, or fifty years ago. And I think it's unlikely most people have such refined palates that they could detect small incremental changes. Regional variations alone seem to counter the idea of some unchanging, standardized flavor. The TAL episode explains the idea behind altering the recipe to allow for changes in the quality of modern ingredients. The New Coke thing seems like it was a good opportunity to make a fairly significant changeover.
« Older The Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Wellbutrin, Celexa, Eff... | One Day in the life of Ivan De... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
The taste test at the supermarket seemed to indicate that the formula is imperfect at best, but I do wonder why they didn't try to do the modern substitutions that they mentioned, i.e. phosphoric acid for citric acid, HFCS for sugar. That would be a much more fair and interesting test.
posted by kmz at 1:02 PM on February 15, 2011