Yeah, I can't think of anything that would represent American values more than forcing TV stations to carry programming they don't want to air.
posted by aaron at 1:56 PM on September 21, 2001
I don't look to PI for brilliant and insightful commentary; but I think, much like the Daily Show on Comedy Central, it's role isn't so much to inform as it is to rip the veil from pompous, self-important "serious" news and punditry programs. Truth is, the words of actress Laura Innes last night were more thoughtful and informed and sincere than almost anything you'll hear on CNN, FOX, etc. Truth is, the self-appointed punditry, those clamoring whores of TV and print looking only for that one shallow bon mot or reputation for "witty" and incisive speech- to say nothing of actual, reasoned analysis- that will bring them 5-figure speaking engagement fees and six or seven figure talk show salaries, don't have anything to offer us. Nothing. Ann Coulter? George Will? Michael Moore? Who are these people, and why should we care what they have to say?
Of course, we shouldn't care what they have to say, and PI shows us that- we see about the same spectrum of thoughtfulness and reason and understanding from an amalgam of tv, film, and sports stars that we do from pin-striped yahoos and former gov't knuckleheads.
posted by hincandenza at 4:21 PM on September 21, 2001
Oddly, no less an insipid whore than Pat Caddell said on PI a few weeks ago, talking about the stem cells, that it was actually a fluff topic: that stem cells aren't an ethical dilemma or even an important one: they're just a convenient ruse to divert attention from the real dilemmas, such as patenting people's own genetic traits, or of concentrating the knowledge of life and health into the hands of purely private, for-profit businesses. But rather than discuss that, we the people were presented with this silly little stem-cell thing to get us all up in arms, make us feel like we were having a national debate and that democracy was "in action", while more important medical issues were quietly resolved out of sight. Like I said, it was stunning that Caddell of all people would posit this. Go figure- maybe Chris Matthews brings out the worst in him, and we were finally seeing the real Pat Caddell.
Regardless, "Network" is an astonishingly brilliant movie, and every time I re-view it I am stunned at how insightful and prescient it was way back in 1976. No discussion of modern media and business could ever be complete without some reference to that amazing movie...
posted by hincandenza at 9:11 PM on September 21, 2001
« Older light relief... | Who Coughs to be a Millionaire... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by jpoulos at 11:25 AM on September 21, 2001