Mark Rice writes about historical urban and colonial photography; specifically the portrayal of American colonial acquisitions and the imperfect "American Dream" captured by the NEA Photography Surveys of the 1970's. He's also a regular contributor to Forbes magazine, constantly measuring America's policies and self-regard against that of other countries. His blog "Ranking America" portrays many of these measurements using good old-fashioned bar graphs. For instance:
The alfalfa one is a pie chart, and a 3D one at that. Trigger warning, please! posted by tonycpsu at 2:18 PM on October 22, 2012
Considering the presence of an "erection length" graph, it's remarkable we don't need a NSFW tag.. posted by obscurator at 2:39 PM on October 22, 2012 [1 favorite]
Dude needs to learn to scale his axes correctly. Take this graph. Is it meaningful that 5.63 is twice as tall as 5.39? It seems to me that the top 10 was clustered close together, so maybe a table of numbers would have been more appropriate. Or maybe for a better bar graph you'd need every country, beyond the top 10.
This says 1.5% of the land is arable. So I take it that 80% of that is agricultural? But then that doesn't fit with data for other countries. posted by Pruitt-Igoe at 4:42 PM on October 22, 2012
Anyone who ever read the classic "How to Lie With Statistics" knows how generally accepted - and generally misleading - truncating charts is. That's why I always look at the scale first. posted by oneswellfoop at 6:12 PM on October 22, 2012
(I get to be on the receiving end of this kind of thing at work all the time. It's MY TURN, dammit!) posted by sneebler at 12:58 PM on October 23, 2012
Yeah, I thought that seemed totally wrong. Netherlands as #1? posted by Pruitt-Igoe at 1:10 PM on October 23, 2012
« Older Six natural disaster experts and one government of... | Russell Means, a leader of the... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by tonycpsu at 2:18 PM on October 22, 2012