January 2, 2002
9:38 PM
Subscribe
So what are your Top Ten movies for 2001? The NYT's
Elvis Mitchell cites "In The Mood For Love" as the best and
David Kehr chooses "The Royal Tenenbaums." Then there's
Roger Ebert who's #1 is "Monster's Ball" and
Harry Knowles who picks, surprise surprise, "The Lord of the Rings."
posted by adrober (58 comments total)
« Older
according to andy borowitz, the cia is using...
| We may grow old because we don...
Newer »
Boy goes on adventure --> Recruits warriors to accompany him --> Battle: Victory! --> Battle: Victory! (fallen comrade) --> Battle: Victory! --> Battle: Victory! (fallen comrade) --> "Let's split up!" --> Movie ends.
......all in 3 hours......
I never read the books, so there's no way I could ever enjoy the nostalgia experienced by LOTRites (like some of my friends). They tried to convince me that it was much deeper than that, that I needed to appreciate the detail and craft involved (crops planted, real weapons, etc.).
If I wanted to make a movie with my webcam of me sitting in my chair for 3 hours, once getting up to go to the bathroom, it may not seem exciting........until you see the 7000-page storyboard script I developed, or the painstaking arrangement of the pictures on the wall behind me! Hell no, the product stinks either way, as I discovered with LOTR.
The only form of nostalgia I experienced was the feeling that I was playing Final Fantasy all over again for Nintendo. Move, fight, win, move, fight, win, fallen comrade, etc.
Ahhh, that game was fun, but I was in control.
posted by Mach3avelli at 9:50 PM on January 2, 2002