Those that read the article will see he passed the shooting test just fine. Why couldn't a blind person with amazing hearing aim at and shoot an attempted murderer by ear any worse than a sighted person would do by eye?
Besides, before the laws were passed requiring permits, he would have just bought a gun without any rigamarole at all. So what's the big diff?posted by aaron at 9:41 PM on January 13, 2001
« Older Wow, these kids must be really clever... | Yahoo Finance: Macromedia chan... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt