Episodes I-III could especially benefit from the silent treatment. posted by mazola at 11:12 AM on July 28, 2007
Well, I liked the idea but they didn't carry it off. You could have actually pulled a great three-minute B&W silent film that way -- but they'd introduce characters like Vader and then drop them... posted by lupus_yonderboy at 11:34 AM on July 28, 2007
I'm real sure this has been posted before, but it's a great clip. I'd love to see the idea fleshed out a lot more. posted by niles at 11:48 AM on July 28, 2007
Agree with the others, though I had to laugh when the AT-AT blew up. posted by evilcolonel at 11:52 AM on July 28, 2007
Would've been better if they'd actually done it chronologically. It jumps between the three too much. Sill a pretty cool concept though. posted by djgh at 12:52 PM on July 28, 2007
The music fits the Ewok scenes perfectly, which is not a compliment to the Ewok scenes. posted by brain_drain at 2:32 PM on July 28, 2007
Great. Disjointed, but still great.
It would have been much better with a title card saying, "that's no moon!" posted by zerokey at 3:34 PM on July 28, 2007
The Star Wars movies actually work pretty well as silent movies already--there's a lot of purely visual storytelling, and they all end with an extended dialogue-free montage. I would love to see what Guy Maddin could do with this idea though. posted by muckster at 5:22 PM on July 28, 2007
That was way better than it had any right to be. I liked it. posted by Cyrano at 5:34 PM on July 28, 2007
Amazing how the effects look worse because we expect cheesy effects in silent movies. posted by Ironmouth at 8:56 AM on July 29, 2007
« Older
The United States and the European Union have agr...
| bouncing ideas: “an infographi...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by mazola at 11:12 AM on July 28, 2007