“I read that e-mail, and I thought, He did it,” the fellow scientist, Nancy Haigwood, said in a recent interview.
In November 2001, when she got the e-mailed photograph of Dr. Ivins working with anthrax in the laboratory, she noticed that he was not wearing gloves — a safety breach she thought showed an unnerving “hubris.” That fed her hunch that he had sent the deadly letters."
1) There isn't any evidence beyond "damning" circumstantial facts;
> Harassment is not a form of investigative work. Neither is lying to a suspect's wife and children and offering them money/cars to change their story.
« Older An Awesome Book... | Viewing the Penanggalan of Mal... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt