It's also not true. Think about how much paperwork and record keeping it would require to actually measure error rate to that level.Reportedly their mistake rate is just 1 in 16 million deliveries, which caused the Forbes Global magazine to award its Six Sigma certification in 2001That's awesome.
Yeah, it's totally inconceivable that there would be a veritable army of pencil-pushers, sitting around in dusty offices with clunky ceiling fans, endlessly filling manila folders with triplicate forms, before tying them up with red ribbons & stacking them along a wall beside the overflowing filing cabinets, for potential future reference.It certainly is when the goal would be to measure how effective a food delivery service is down to one part in ten million. And to get an adequate sample size you would actually need to track perhaps a hundred million of these deliveries. And of course all the paperwork would need to be flawless as well. Why would they do it? What would be the point of such an endeavor? To provide an anecdote for brain-dead six-sigma consultants?
How about you have a process where you record all errors, but only errors. So we estimate deliveries made based on periodic sampling, and we have 1 (one) record of an actual error. Doesn't seem too onerous to me.How would you know if other deliveries had failed, but had not been recorded?
Why can't the husbands carry their own lunches to work? RickK 21:28, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)posted by crapmatic at 10:20 PM on December 17, 2009Typically because lunch wouldn't quite be ready by the time they leave in the morning. Ambarish | Talk 22:39, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)Also, in India, people prefer food that is hot (temperature) and fresh.--g
« Older On July 12, 2008, Luis Ramirez was beaten to death... | The Aught-O-Matic.... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by leotrotsky at 11:37 AM on December 17, 2009 [1 favorite]