October 10, 2001 8:10 AM   Subscribe

Kabulkaboom - here's a shockwave game with a bite - dodge the missiles and try and get the food. Which do you prefer, this "humanitarian game" from ludology.com or New York Defender, mentioned here at MeFi the other day?
posted by jill (6 comments total)
New York defender..
some ppl *really* have no moral decency
posted by monkeyJuice at 8:22 AM on October 10, 2001

I like the game where you beat the living crap out of the anti war protestors until they can come up with a better idea.
posted by bondcliff at 9:35 AM on October 10, 2001

wow -- you must also like the games where you slap your wife around until she doesn't burn the toast!

keep keepin' it real, bondcliff!
posted by fishfucker at 10:07 AM on October 10, 2001

Well, there are world courts, bondcliff. I'd say using them would be better than killing a bunch of civilians, and provoking more terrorism. I am ignorant of their effectiveness though, so I could be wrong. Doesn't matter anyway, because it doesn't appear to be an option under consideration. Also, with war you only have to produce evidence to your allies.
posted by zangpo at 10:15 AM on October 10, 2001

Bin Laden Liquors is pretty good.
posted by abosio at 12:59 PM on October 10, 2001

There's always the game where you shoot terrorists, but every time you miss and hit a civilian, ten new terrorists pop up. That game's really hard to win, for some reason.
posted by dhartung at 4:46 PM on October 10, 2001

« Older Blair now a 'legitimate target.'   |   Unhappy with the shape of your bottom? Newer »

This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments