neet.
December 7, 2005 7:03 AM Subscribe
Wow, that is nice. He's got a real sense of line wieght (something that's always given me trouble), and his drafting is solid, especially cross-hatching. Good stuff.
posted by klangklangston at 7:12 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by klangklangston at 7:12 AM on December 7, 2005
I don't understand how to make things appear. When I click on links, all I get are words and squares. Am I supposed to click the squares for every image I want to see?
posted by jacquilynne at 7:23 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by jacquilynne at 7:23 AM on December 7, 2005
Trouble? I can't even spell line weight!
posted by klangklangston at 7:26 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by klangklangston at 7:26 AM on December 7, 2005
It's a lovely site but you may have to view it in Firefox or IE to see the great pictures. On Safari they're smushed over on the right hand side. Thanks for posting this.
posted by jessamyn at 7:27 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by jessamyn at 7:27 AM on December 7, 2005
I looked through this site yesterday and thought it was great! Nice post.
posted by OmieWise at 7:35 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by OmieWise at 7:35 AM on December 7, 2005
Generally, artistic nudes are considered SFW. They are not porn. Unless your work place considers art to be dangerous. In which case you have bigger problems when you consider "NSFW" artwork hangs in public museums and public buildings all over the nation. (sometimes I think people put "NSFW" to draw more attention).
posted by stbalbach at 8:19 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by stbalbach at 8:19 AM on December 7, 2005
stbalbach: Your point is correct in theory, but it doesn't work in practice. If someone passing by my office sees boobies on my monitor, they aren't going to assess whether they are artistic boobies, they are just going to shake their heads and tell everyone I am a pervert. delmoi's warning is appropriate.
posted by brain_drain at 8:40 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by brain_drain at 8:40 AM on December 7, 2005
jacquilynne, the site's a bit of a mess. The images are on the FAR right (to the right of the nav), yet there are no horizontal scrollbars so the only way to see them is to have a huge monitor and open the browser all the way. I'm on a 20" widescreen monitor and they just fit on my screen. I'm on Safari. Presumably it doesn't work this way on some other browsers.
posted by dobbs at 8:44 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by dobbs at 8:44 AM on December 7, 2005
Yep, this site is well stuffed on Safari.
Thumbnails on the far right look good on preview.
posted by rawfishy at 8:46 AM on December 7, 2005
Thumbnails on the far right look good on preview.
posted by rawfishy at 8:46 AM on December 7, 2005
Yeah, nice stuff. Tell the man/woman that he/she needs to fix that damn site for us Safari-using saps, though.
posted by sluggo at 8:56 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by sluggo at 8:56 AM on December 7, 2005
Our own Jay.Jansheski has a cool art site, too. (Say hey to Lynn for me, Mr. Chessking!)
posted by kimota at 9:09 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by kimota at 9:09 AM on December 7, 2005
I'm pretty sure I like every one of those images. Awesome.
posted by Witty at 9:39 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by Witty at 9:39 AM on December 7, 2005
I think I stared at the cigarette for a solid 5 minutes.
posted by Witty at 9:44 AM on December 7, 2005
posted by Witty at 9:44 AM on December 7, 2005
Really great work. This is going to send me to my sketch pad where I will try to draw something - anything - for five minutes before giving up in frustration.
posted by LeeJay at 1:36 PM on December 7, 2005
posted by LeeJay at 1:36 PM on December 7, 2005
Good work. The Zombie Willem Dafoe was my favourite, for pure uncanniness.
posted by MetaMonkey at 1:39 PM on December 7, 2005
posted by MetaMonkey at 1:39 PM on December 7, 2005
safari folks - sorry! :( i don't have a mac, or even access to one. im working on a barebones list of links to art just for you guys. Im not giving you the finger - i swear.
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 3:44 PM on December 7, 2005
posted by Tryptophan-5ht at 3:44 PM on December 7, 2005
« Older Bubble collapses are, like, so 2001 | isometrics for everyone! Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by brain_drain at 7:11 AM on December 7, 2005