Join 3,553 readers in helping fund MetaFilter (Hide)


Free at Last!
August 22, 2003 7:51 AM   Subscribe

Wouldn't this chafe or something? I'm presuming the less than technical language is a result of translating difficulties...or is this a joke? Is, um, family jewel confinement a common source of discomfort for men? (NSFW)
posted by Oriole Adams (22 comments total)

 
Wow. Some things, crotchless underwear for example, the gents should just leave to women. It looks like a hernia, and I can only *imagine* what it looks like when they aren't nicely shaved for photographs.
posted by headspace at 7:54 AM on August 22, 2003


This is indeed odd. I've heard that it's better to let your fellows hang free, but this seems a bit much. And it does seem to lend itself to all sorts of problems. Just imagine the zipper complications . . .
posted by aladfar at 7:55 AM on August 22, 2003


Finally, my prayers have been answered. Go, sac o' mine. Run free, run like the wind!
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 7:59 AM on August 22, 2003


Ever thought of entering them in the Olympics KevinSkomsvold?
posted by ginz at 8:04 AM on August 22, 2003


Oh HELL YEA. Brilliant. I'm going to cut holes in all my jeans pockets.
posted by vito90 at 8:06 AM on August 22, 2003


Not safe for work? Yea gods that an understatement. I work in the porn industry and I wasn't expecting that! ;)

Can I suggest NSFt42W as the next level on the "Ohmygodnogivemebackmyeyes" scale?
posted by twine42 at 8:06 AM on August 22, 2003


Combine with some NipGuardstm and KevinSkomsvold would indeed be ready for the Olympics.
posted by shoepal at 8:15 AM on August 22, 2003


I work in the porn industry

There's one in every goddamned crowd.
posted by vito90 at 8:17 AM on August 22, 2003


Those wacky Germans.
posted by arielmeadow at 8:18 AM on August 22, 2003


Some MefiGuys may find them advantageous. Never forget that "Above all, who works vocationally much in sitting, will appreciate the liberty of sacfree".
posted by Tarrama at 8:27 AM on August 22, 2003


Finally, the cock-commanding constriction of briefs, combined with the free-balling comfort of boxers. I wonder if they have another that keeps your pills snug but lets your faddle waggle around.
posted by scarabic at 8:32 AM on August 22, 2003


SacOlympics? I like it. Host Country? Sacramento of course.

I'm still waiting for the first person to finally fess up and say "Yes I admit, I have a medical condition that requires my scrotum to roam free". If such a person exists here and speaks up, I will run around the John Hancock center dressed in nothing but a pair of these things. Until then, I'm going with the idea it's a parody.
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 8:45 AM on August 22, 2003


Is Sacramento a country? Meant "city". Sorry.
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 8:47 AM on August 22, 2003


There's one in every goddamned crowd.

Nono... it's just me. I just get everywhere, if you'll pardon the phrase. ;)
posted by twine42 at 8:51 AM on August 22, 2003


And Sacfree is sexy!

According to whom, exactly? This is my vote, from the heterosexual female camp, for "not sexy in the least". If my husband wore a pair of these things, I probably couldn't help laughing at him. Fortunately, I'm pretty sure he'd find them as stupid as I do.
posted by Shoeburyness at 9:25 AM on August 22, 2003


Yes I admit, I have a medical condition that requires my scrotum to roam free" ...

I do. heh. Where's the John Hancock center. Where's my camera?

posted by ginz at 9:31 AM on August 22, 2003


Sacfree + New Condom Patent = Market Synergy!
posted by shoepal at 9:34 AM on August 22, 2003


shoepal, if I had been drinking something when I read that, it'd be all over the screen now.
posted by me3dia at 12:10 PM on August 22, 2003


My boys need support. I can't have them swinging around like some hippie's stash of contraband Salvadorean plums.
posted by UncleFes at 2:47 PM on August 22, 2003


Um, I've never really noticed a need to let my nut sac waggle freely or even under partial confinement. If you're gonna dangle then why not go commando and save money on some stupid looking underwear.

Maybe I'm not open minded enough or something.

They also look like they'd hurt after a while.
posted by fenriq at 3:51 PM on August 22, 2003


No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO. NO.

No way.
posted by davidmsc at 3:56 PM on August 22, 2003


Looks like the mullet for the new millenium. Business in the front, party in the sac.
posted by Stan Chin at 4:18 PM on August 22, 2003


« Older The 40 oz. Archive....  |  President Bush's interest in h... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments