Umm, it "explores an era when architecture magazine covers where actually interesting." posted by signal at 2:17 AM on February 8, 2007
I'm with Bldgblog - more fun in architecture back then, when the profession hadn't been completely beaten to a pulp by the exegesis of developers and a "design" addled general population. But I do think the show sadly missed my favorite little magazine, Pamphlet Architecture, by Steven Holl, back when he was cool posted by DenOfSizer at 7:29 AM on February 8, 2007
The site sure 'covers' its subject. To the depth of an oil slick. In Newtonian terms, a waste of space and a waste of time. posted by hexatron at 7:44 AM on February 8, 2007
My goodness, how vituperative. You must be an architect, hexatron. May I point out that the show is a thing one attends in person? posted by DenOfSizer at 7:59 AM on February 8, 2007
Interesting. Magazines in general sure have come a long way.
Don't hold back hexatron, tell us how you really feel posted by Mitheral at 11:17 AM on February 8, 2007
« Older
The internet is a series of Pipes....
| How marbles are made....
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by signal at 2:17 AM on February 8, 2007