Thanks for this, Jeff. Edward Tufte has also written and lectured extensively on "visualizing quantitative information" (his phrase, not mine). When it's done well, as in isotype, there's a kind of elegance and beauty to it that moves it beyond mapping to art. posted by angiep at 4:01 PM on February 21
Neurath as in Neurath's boat? This is a pictographic language developed in the spirit of positivism? Awesome, I didn't know about this! Thanks! posted by painquale at 4:39 PM on February 21
This pdf gives a nice explication of the theory underlying Isotype. I have to admit that I'm a little disappointed. Members of the Vienna Circle were all about supplanting natural languages with more perfect artificial languages (Carnap was a big Esperanto proponent), but while I can see that Neurath had some (flawed) theory about how this makes vocabulary more perfect, there's no sign of what the grammar is supposed to look like. Neurath promises a grammar of pictures in these writings, but I don't see anything approaching a formal way to compose new pictures from a stock of primitive ones. That transition from shoe to handmade shoe doesn't look like it's based on any purely logical principles. I'm surprised -- the positivists were all about logical structure. I was hoping for a thoroughly positivist picture language.
While the isotype symbols might not be universally communicable, they are evocative in a way that would make them easy to teach and learn. And it would be useful to have a set of symbols, similar in design to isotype, recognized by a large segment of the world's population, for use on warning signs and the like. posted by LogicalDash at 7:24 PM on February 21
posted by Jeff_Larson at 3:31 PM on February 21