Stochastichausen posted by kcds at 2:09 PM on September 3
I like the concept more than the actual results. posted by shammack at 3:26 PM on September 3
kcds: actually this is pretty much up Xenakis' alley, much more so than Stockhausen. And it is not stochastic, it is generative (derived from specific data, not random or pseudo-random). posted by idiopath at 3:39 PM on September 3
Well I was hoping this was going to be wave terrain synthesis using lunar geographic data, rather than a score for a midi style sampled instrument derived from such data, and I take back the Xenakis comparison and substitute Atlas Eclipticalis era John Cage (much less interesting, in my opinion). posted by idiopath at 3:47 PM on September 3
idiopath: thank you for beating any possible remaining semblance of humor from my post with your exacting pedantry. posted by kcds at 5:49 PM on September 3 [1 favorite]
Recommendation: Set the play speed to somewhere between 12 and 16, leave the preset scales at '---', give the 'Main Note' and 'Mid Note' ranges of about 80 degrees while setting their lower boundaries above 18 (?), change all the instruments to 'Harpsichord', put it in 'orbit play' mode, and voila, the Sun Ra/Cecil Taylor duo record you've never heard, or heard of.
The Moon is a Deep Cat, Dig? posted by Minus215Cee at 6:24 PM on September 3
Oh, that was a joke? That frail little delicate thing? I didn't meant to trample all over it, I didn't even notice it was there, I swear. posted by idiopath at 6:26 PM on September 3
« Older
The New Yorker has published "Max at Sea"...
| Jan Chipchase is employeed by ...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by The Whelk at 1:33 PM on September 3