Advertise here: Contact FM.


Sarah Palin as McCain's running-mate
August 29, 2008 7:52 AM   RSS feed for this thread Subscribe

Fox, the BBC and CNN have all revealed that Republican US presidential candidate John McCain has picked Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate on his 72nd birthday on the eve of the start of Republican National Convention. Despite being wildly popular in Alaska, Palin has recently been involved in an investigation over whether she dismissed a public safety commissioner because he refused to dismiss her former brother-in-law.
posted by HaloMan (5555 comments total) 137 users marked this as a favorite

Palin comparison. Too easy.
posted by ColdChef at 7:57 AM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


Could she be a political bridge builder?
posted by b1tr0t at 7:57 AM on August 29, 2008 [16 favorites]


a bitty?
posted by yonation at 7:58 AM on August 29, 2008


That CNN link is strong.
posted by Kwantsar at 7:58 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


In 2005, before Palin ran for office, the Palin family accused [ex-brother-in-law]Wooten of drinking a beer while in his patrol car, illegal hunting and firing a Taser at his 11-year-old stepson. The Palins also claimed Wooten threatened to kill Sarah Palin's father.

Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
posted by ColdChef at 7:59 AM on August 29, 2008 [46 favorites]


Wait, wait, one of the Pythons has been....?

Oh, sorry. I'll get me coat.
posted by Happy Dave at 7:59 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


You beat me to the punch, though this FPP is better than mine would've been! Never heard of this woman, but it's a smart strategy if only to attract those couple-of-million or so PUMAs, the Clintonites who won't vote for Obama. (Not to be confused with cougars, btw).
posted by zardoz at 7:59 AM on August 29, 2008


Oooww, this is gonna be fun to watch at Alegre's Corner.

(Alegre being a Hillary dead-ender whose fervent support of Hillary has been eclipsed by her hate for Obama, ostensibly out of love for Hillary.)
posted by orthogonality at 8:00 AM on August 29, 2008


All snark aside: History is now guaranteed to be made in November. (Perhaps a silver lining in one case, though.)
posted by DU at 8:00 AM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


McCain wants to siphon the disgruntled/woman scorned Hillary vote, I guess.

Obama's speech last night was incredibly moving. America, such an amazing, wonderful place, would do well to elect Obama. He is the dream realized.
posted by plexi at 8:01 AM on August 29, 2008 [21 favorites]


It'll be interesting to see how successful the strategy of trying to siphon off -- or at least create some cognitive dissonance in -- disappointed Hillary supporters will be. My guess is that even the most bitter Hillary supporters won't pull the lever for someone as pro-life as Palin apparently is.
posted by pardonyou? at 8:02 AM on August 29, 2008


who?
posted by pyramid termite at 8:03 AM on August 29, 2008


Hah! I can't wait until the former Hillary supporters decide that having two X chromosomes is more important than any conceivable position on the issues. Four more years! 100 more years of war! Woohoo!
posted by nasreddin at 8:03 AM on August 29, 2008 [20 favorites]


She admits that she used marijuana when it was legal in Alaska, but says that she did not like it.
posted by R. Mutt at 8:03 AM on August 29, 2008


In a near 50/50 split, all the Republicans would need is a small number of Hillary supporters who cared more about what Hillary represented than her policies to switch over. The man is crazy like a fox.
posted by the jam at 8:04 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


She was a heartbeat away from being Miss Alaska.
posted by Poolio at 8:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [13 favorites]


First black president or first female vice president? That's awesome.

My two cents, since that's what this thread is I guess: in comparison to Biden, who seems to have been picked for his expertise and experience, Palin seems like the ultimate ploy to hack the vote demographically - women, younger voters, the base - that seems really off to me. Shouldn't we be thinking now more than ever about who is ready to lead this country on day one, not who can get elected? It all just looks like such a nakedly political move to me in a way that Biden's selection really didn't come off as.

Then again, I'm just another rabid Obama fan in our little echo chamber here, so I don't think the campaign cares what I think
posted by Muffpub at 8:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


Movin' water wiv a bukkit? That's Palin.
posted by Mister_A at 8:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


She admits that she used marijuana when it was legal in Alaska, but says that she did not like it.

At least she inhaled.
posted by pardonyou? at 8:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


All the presidents and VPs in US history have been white and male. That is guaranteed to change this January, barring some freak occurrence, and I think that's awesome.

But is the Christian right really going to accept a mother with a 5-month-old infant going on the campaign trail? I've known too many who think that mothers shouldn't be working at all, or at least not till the kids are in school. And there's no way she's prepard to take over if McCain dies.
posted by Jeanne at 8:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain/Palin: Do it for your ovaries.
posted by plexi at 8:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


She was crowned Miss Wasilla in 1984 and was a runner-up in the Miss Alaska pageant.
posted by ColdChef at 8:07 AM on August 29, 2008


What's the over/under on how long it takes McCain to flip-flop on his position on drilling in ANWAR? He currently claims to be opposed. She is for. Hmmm... who do you think will win? Not the oil companies, surely?
posted by The Bellman at 8:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Sarah and Todd Palin have five children: boys Track, 19, and Trig, 4 months, and daughters Bristol, 17, Willow, 13, and Piper, 7.

Dear GOD! Vice Presidents don't get to NAME anything, do they?!
posted by ColdChef at 8:09 AM on August 29, 2008 [205 favorites]


Her?
posted by mjthomas at 8:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


So Hillary was cheering for Obama to lose so she can have her run in 2012. Now what? If Obama loses, You have McCain for 4-8 years, then you have to run against Palin, another woman and the sitting Vice President. Not only does this cinch the election for McCain, it completely screws over and buries Clinton. Her dream of being the first female President just got a lot harder.
posted by loquax at 8:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Oh my god, really?

Really?

Look, to be fair, I was halfway through a post last night on my own site about how ridiculous I though all the hard-right Freepers/Cornerites/etc. were harping about Palin. She was basically their new Fred Thompson. But I am seriously dumbfounded that they would have been this stupid.

Don’t get me wrong, on a PR level this is masterful for McCain. He’s killed all the momentum and press coverage about Obama’s amazing speech last night. So I really am amazed they think that one shot at gaining the press advantage was worth the most unbelievably inept VP pick I could have possibly imagined.

Forget even among fields of conservatives in general: is anyone from the McCain camp going to make a convincing case that Palin is remotely close to the most qualified woman in the GOP to be a heartbeat away from taking over a guy who turns 72 today and has a history of cancer? She has been governor- for 18 months- of a state with a population smaller than Obama’s state senate district in Illinois. Her previous office was the mayor of an Alaskan town with a population smaller than 3,000 people. At the very minimum, Obama has sat in on foreign policy sessions and dealt with national and international issues on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Palin has no foreign policy experience. This is literally one step above giving the slot to the winner of a game show.

So in what I can only perceive as a complete fit of insanity, McCain has decided to destroy with one pick the three talking points he had as an advantage over Obama:

Experience: She has none. Palin is utterly unqualified to be president of the U.S. Senate, let alone the country should anything befall McCain.

Celebrity: She’s a former beauty pageant winner who’s done multiple cover shoots for fashion and culture magazines and her claim to fame is being the subject of an article titled “America’s Hottest Governor.” There will be more talk about how she’s attractive than her actual policy credentials. Her gender, in light of her utter political weakness, will be seen blatantly- and rightly- as the novelty McCain picked it for. There is no clearer a celebrity pick for McCain than this one.

Moderate Female Voters: Putting aside for a moment that she's outrageously anti-choice, if McCain truly believes that what really appeals to middle-age working-class white women is a younger, prettier, but amazingly less-qualified woman getting the promotion that Hillary Clinton didn’t, then I can’t really reflect any greater how utterly deaf to the interests of women the Republican Party is.


Jesus tap-dancing Christ. If McCain wanted a former beauty queen with no experience and a criminal investigation on her record I don’t know why he didn’t just pick his own wife.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 8:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [449 favorites]


Very smart choice by McCain. I mean, sure, nobody knows anything about her, but she covers his biggest flaws: too old, and more of the same. Honestly, is there anyone else he could have picked that anyone would be excited about at all?

(Although, the talking heads are going to have a field day with the beauty queen angle.)
posted by designbot at 8:10 AM on August 29, 2008


I have this dreadful feeling that America *will* vote for four eight years more of McBush. Obama seems a bit too good to be true, and a adding a somewhat 'progressive' (if an anti-abortion, life-time member of NRA can be called that) swing to his campaign... my somewhat bitter money is on McCain winning this thing.

Also, she (hopefully unfairly) reminds me of Mrs. Kitty Farmer from Donnie Darko.
posted by Harry at 8:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Twenty bucks says Lorne Michaels gets Tina Fey to play her on SNL. It's uncanny!
posted by ColdChef at 8:11 AM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


Hah! I can't wait until the former Hillary supporters decide that having two X chromosomes is more important than any conceivable position on the issues. Four more years! 100 more years of war! Woohoo!

What's Bizzare is that some of the really hard-core Hillary types have been demanding that Obama not pick any other woman.

Sarah Palin is totally out of left Feild, some people were expecting McCain to pick Kay Bailey Hutchison or even Meg Whitman, along with the usual suspects of Pawlenty or Lieberman or Tom Ridge.

I don't know that much about Palin, I do know she got into office after defeating seriously corrupt incumbent (Lisa Merkowski's father, IIRC) in the republican primary.
posted by delmoi at 8:12 AM on August 29, 2008


Shouldn't we be thinking now more than ever about who is ready to lead this country on day one, not who can get elected?

Don't be silly. I'd take a milf over smarmy Joe Biden any day.
posted by jsavimbi at 8:12 AM on August 29, 2008


Might as well start:

...and this spring she gave birth to her fifth child, who was found to have Down syndrome.

Uh-huh. 44 years old and four kids aren't enough? Did she not get the memo about the high chance of Down's Syndrome for babies born by older (over 35 I believe) women? I imagine wanting to have as many kids as possible has something to do with her religious beliefs. Probably everything to do with her religious beliefs.

The investigation outlined in that last link sounds like an episode of COPS. Real class act we got here. She is easy on the eyes, though, which can only help her TV presence.

And yes, she really was Miss Congeniality. No, really.
posted by zardoz at 8:14 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


And there's no way she's prepard to take over if McCain dies.

I've heard this from a number of times already, and I don't think the Obama supporters making this claim realize how ridiculous it sounds coming from them. Four years as a Senator is plenty of experience, but two years of governorship? No way she's prepared.
posted by Kwantsar at 8:14 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


MCCAIN CHOOSES YOUNGER WOMAN.

Cindy said to be worried.
posted by djgh at 8:14 AM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


I question the wisdom of this choice from a McCain perspective. You'll get some PUMAs, sure, but it severely undercuts the Republicans' main line of attack against Obama: that he's not experienced enough. Has Palin ever been outside of the country? Met a foreign leader?

Also: how long before we see footage of the Miss Alaska pageant juxtaposed with a scary attack-ad narrator reminding Americans that the presidency is "not a beauty pageant"?
posted by sy at 8:15 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Not only does this cinch the election for McCain...

What.

she coversaccentuates his biggest flaws: too old,

FTFY
posted by DU at 8:15 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


In a near 50/50 split, all the Republicans would need is a bunch of crooked voting machines.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 8:16 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


I heard they are sending Palin to Russia to sort out this war!

That would be a weird scoop
posted by Harry at 8:16 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."
posted by flashboy at 8:16 AM on August 29, 2008 [86 favorites]


In a near 50/50 split, all the Republicans would need is a small number of Hillary supporters who cared more about what Hillary represented than her policies to switch over. The man is crazy like a fox.

That's what Im thinking. A lot of women who may reluctantly vote Democrat or who dont usually vote will come out in droves to vote for another women, solely on gender. If that gets McCain an extra half percent in 2 or 3 strategic states then he just won. I think this is a genius move.

I feel that Obama just lost or that this race will be decided on a razor thin margin.
posted by damn dirty ape at 8:16 AM on August 29, 2008


Clearly McCain's got a thing for beauty queens.
posted by hydrophonic at 8:17 AM on August 29, 2008


Wait, what... McCain selected Harriet Myers as his VP?
posted by GhostintheMachine at 8:17 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I have that same dread. But maybe (just maybe) Obama can actually get the younger demographic to come out and !(@!& vote on what is probably the most important elected position on this planet.
posted by Harry at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


According to Wikipedia she eats moose burgers. Recipe here
posted by randomination at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008


Two years ago she was the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska (named after a pagan god), pop. 8,471.
posted by kirkaracha at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008


experience: She has none. Palin is utterly unqualified to be president of the U.S. Senate, let alone the country should anything befall McCain.

She’s a former beauty pageant winner who’s done multiple cover shoots for fashion and culture magazines

Take a gander at Fox News sometime. Do you think any of those peroxide blondes have ever taken a journalism course?

Joe Republican wants gays to stay in San Francisco, a closet full of guns, and a TV full of war and pretty women. If "experience" or "qualifications' were any sort of requirement Republicans would never win.
posted by plexi at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


Four years as a Senator is plenty of experience, but two years of governorship? No way she's prepared.

No, four years as a U.S. Senator plus eight years as a State Senator is more prepared than 18 months of governorship and six years as the mayor of a town smaller than your average community college. Can we be done with this one now?
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008 [64 favorites]


Looks like a pretty naked attempt to go after the Ellen Jamesian Society vote -- voters so blinded with anger and bitterness about the primary loss to Obama, that they'll vote for McCain just out of spite, even against the exhortations of their own messiah -- on McCain's part.

I do not think that this cohort is statistically significant in anyway, so it won't work. It's a blown opportunity for McCain.

I was really hoping for Lieberman, if for no other reason than for an opportunity to see both of these demagogic jackasses run out of the country on a rail come November.
posted by psmealey at 8:18 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


I gather she hates bears.
posted by twsf at 8:19 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Uh-huh. 44 years old and four kids aren't enough? Did she not get the memo about the high chance of Down's Syndrome for babies born by older (over 35 I believe) women? I imagine wanting to have as many kids as possible has something to do with her religious beliefs. Probably everything to do with her religious beliefs.

Sarah Palin appears to be an inexperienced politician chosen primarily for short-sighted demographic appeal. But (imho, of course) it's completely distasteful to criticize her for wanting to have children, or for having the misfortunate to have a disabled child. Quite frankly, I found her quoted response about her child in the Wikipedia article:
"I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection," Palin said. "Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?"
To be quite inspiring.
posted by pardonyou? at 8:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [33 favorites]


Wow. If there was any doubt that this whole election is about identity politics, that's pretty much gone now.

Problem is - McCain is old. Are Republicans really going to be okay with this woman as President?

He's playing to the undecideds, here, but he risks losing his Republican base.

I heard that he might pick her on NPR this morning. The only clue? Someone had updated the wikipedia article about her and then quickly changed it back....
posted by lunit at 8:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Thank you.
posted by Daddy-O at 8:21 AM on August 29, 2008


It's gonna take a lot of popcorn and beer and a real comfortable chair to sit and watch the next few months.....
posted by HuronBob at 8:22 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection," Palin said. "Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?"

"Thank God he's not gay, amirite?" she added.
posted by notmydesk at 8:22 AM on August 29, 2008 [61 favorites]


Celebrity: She’s a former beauty pageant winner who’s done multiple cover shoots for fashion and culture magazines and her claim to fame is being the subject of an article titled “America’s Hottest Governor.” There will be more talk about how she’s attractive than her actual policy credentials. Her gender, in light of her utter political weakness, will be seen blatantly- and rightly- as the novelty McCain picked it for. There is no clearer a celebrity pick for McCain than this one.

I also wonder if that's going to seriously backfire with the PUMA types as well, I mean if these older women are upset about all the men that they feel have gotten an easier time in life because of their gender, how are they going to feel about a beautiful woman getting ahead based on her looks, rather then her "hard work". Hillary was never about good looks and glamor.

I mean I don't know at all, but I imagine that some of those women are going to feel that she was picked for her looks, since she really doesn't have much experience. Certainly doesn't compare to Biden or even Obama himself.
posted by delmoi at 8:23 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]



I've heard this from a number of times already, and I don't think the Obama supporters making this claim realize how ridiculous it sounds coming from them. Four years as a Senator is plenty of experience, but two years of governorship? No way she's prepared.


From wikipedia:

Palin's experience: After being selected as the runner up in the 1984 Miss Alaska contest, Palin served two terms on the Wasilla, Alaska City Council from 1992 to 1996, was elected mayor of Wasilla in 1996, and ran unsuccessfully for Lieutenant Governor in 2002.

After charging ethical violations by state Republican Party leaders,[2] she won election in 2006 by first defeating the incumbent governor in the Republican primary, then a former Democratic Alaskan governor in the general election.


Obama's experience: A graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he served as president of the Harvard Law Review, Obama worked as a community organizer and practiced as a civil rights attorney before serving in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. He taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004. Following an unsuccessful bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000, he announced his campaign for the U.S. Senate in January 2003. After a primary victory in March 2004, Obama delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in July 2004. He was elected to the Senate in November 2004 with 70% of the vote.

As a member of the Democratic minority in the 109th Congress, he helped create legislation to control conventional weapons and to promote greater public accountability in the use of federal funds. He also made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. During the 110th Congress, he helped create legislation regarding lobbying and electoral fraud, climate change, nuclear terrorism, and care for returned U.S. military personnel. After announcing his presidential campaign in February 2007, Obama emphasized withdrawing American troops from Iraq, energy independence, decreasing the influence of lobbyists, and promoting universal health care as top national priorities.


Who sounds more qualified to be President?
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 8:24 AM on August 29, 2008 [24 favorites]


She's a spokesmodel for the conservative right. It's a smart, if revolting, pick.
posted by argybarg at 8:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I don't like Sarah Palin. I admit it's something of a pet issue of mine, but her wildlife management practices in Alaska are horrible. After Alaskan voters voted against aerial hunting of wolves, she went against the will of the people by adding a bounty for wolf kills.

I'm sick to death of this entire "presidential race" and I wish they could just get things over with and let the Republicans steal the election now so we can all go back to our lives already.
posted by infinitywaltz at 8:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


How tough will Joe Biden be able to get on her in the debate without people calling him a sexist pig? (Notwithstanding his voting record and the whole violence against women legislation thing or anything that actually makes sense)
posted by wabbittwax at 8:25 AM on August 29, 2008


Who sounds more qualified to be President?
posted by Fuzzy Monster


Hyuk. Garsh. The purdy one!!!
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 8:26 AM on August 29, 2008


I also wonder if that's going to seriously backfire with the PUMA types as well, I mean if these older women are upset about all the men that they feel have gotten an easier time in life because of their gender, how are they going to feel about a beautiful woman getting ahead based on her looks, rather then her "hard work".

Hey, in John McCain's time, this was social progress.
posted by kittens for breakfast at 8:26 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


> In a near 50/50 split, all the Republicans would need is a bunch of crooked voting machines.

You're living in the past, Fuzzy Monster. It's just like that rainforest scare a few years back. Our officials saw there was a problem and they fixed it, didn't they?
posted by The Card Cheat at 8:27 AM on August 29, 2008


"I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the V.P. does every day?"

-- Sarah Palin, on being the possible vice presidential nominee
posted by Rhaomi at 8:28 AM on August 29, 2008 [13 favorites]


Bumbling, old senator as President, and the hot, young moose-burger-eating Governor from Alaska as VP?

I've got a great idea for a sitcom.
posted by R. Mutt at 8:28 AM on August 29, 2008 [26 favorites]


I can't wait for the VP debates. "Governor Palin, Recent polls have shown a fifth of Americans can't locate the U.S. on a world map. Why do you think this is?"
posted by hydrophonic at 8:28 AM on August 29, 2008 [30 favorites]


Remember when GHWB picked Dan Quale as his Vice Presidential running mate? People have been saying ever since that it was a misstep. This is an even bigger misstep and John McCain doesn't have the horsepower and momentum to overcome such an obviously poor choice. Experience and judgement indeed.
posted by Daddy-O at 8:29 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Rhaomi: ""I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the V.P. does every day?"

-- Sarah Palin, on being the possible vice presidential nominee
"

Source please.
posted by geekyguy at 8:29 AM on August 29, 2008


I've had this nagging fear all along that McCain was going to win no matter what Obama did. Now I know he is. This is indeed a brilliant PR move and yes, this election is historic no matter what.

*sigh* The first woman VP is pretty awesome. I just wish it could be from a campaign that wasn't going to flush America further down the toilet.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 8:29 AM on August 29, 2008


LONGBOAT VEEP
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 8:29 AM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


come again?
posted by photoslob at 8:30 AM on August 29, 2008


But (imho, of course) it's completely distasteful to criticize her for wanting to have children, or for having the misfortunate to have a disabled child.

I am criticizing her for wanting to have children, but what does that have to do with having a disabled child? Please don't conflate these two things. I think it is a fair criticism to question a woman who is 44 years of age, and therefore more likely to have a disabled child. Her decision to have a child in the first place put the child at risk before he/she was even born. I dunno, maybe I'm cranky at the motives of religious types these days, but just because someone wants to be a mother doesn't automatically make it a good idea.
posted by zardoz at 8:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [22 favorites]


Shouldn't we be thinking now more than ever about who is ready to lead this country on day one, not who can get elected? It all just looks like such a nakedly political move to me in a way that Biden's selection really didn't come off as.

What are you talking about? The McCain camp has critized Obama as being too young and inexperienced in foreign policy, and not ready to lead, so Obama chose someone who can offset those charges -- someone who is old and experienced and has lots of foreign policy experience. Of course it was a political move to pick him. Pick the person who can most help you win the election. I mean, duh.

Obama's camp has critized McCain for being old and stuffy and too much like George Bush, and one of McCain's biggest weaknesses is in not being seen as someone who will bring about change, someone who cares about little people, someone who will bring in the breath of fresh air that Obama is seen as. Palin could not be further from George Bush and Washington. She has the same youth that Obama has and McCain lacks. She is a big reformer in Alaska, and is supposedly the most popular Governor in the US. The fact that she may appeal to the ex-Hillary voters is frankly a brilliantly political move. And it reinforces his reputation as a maverick, something the Democrats have been trying to erase during the convention.

I don't usually mind it, and I guess I don't mind it so much in this thread, either, but it is clear to me that Metafilter is so partisan that it can't really view election issues clearly or with any distance. This was a really smart move for McCain, as long as she doesn't have something in her past that will come back to bite him. This next week and the Republican convention might be tough for Democrats.
posted by onlyconnect at 8:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


I've gathered some immediate reactions from around the liberal blogosphere, illustrated by pictures of faceless, featureless DC Comics superheroine The Question.
posted by gerryblog at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'll work my fingers to the bone for Obama, but this is depressing. Palin is good shtick -- imagine the convention address, the mooseburger recipes, etc. She'll be a horrible VP, but she's politically good pick.
posted by argybarg at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008


pardonyou? writes "'I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection,' Palin said. 'Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?'"

Lots of Rupublican compassion for an extra chromosome, not so much for men born liking show-tunes and cock.
posted by orthogonality at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


Well, they won with Quayle.
posted by kirkaracha at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


My $1.99 opinion: It's a desperation move. Someone who can make the ticket look younger and whom they hope will pull just enough PUMA votes away from the Obama-Biden ticket. I also think they are hoping her looks and personality will take some of the attention off McCain. Clearly, they are tightly managing his interviews and appearances...and for good reason!
posted by jleisek at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008


Her previous office was the mayor of an Alaskan town with a population smaller than 3,000 people.

The GOP is sick of your lies. The town has 8,000 people now!
posted by Ironmouth at 8:32 AM on August 29, 2008


geekyguy: "Source please."

Here you go. (@2:50)
posted by Rhaomi at 8:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


"Thank God he's not gay, amirite?" she added.

Joke acknowledged, but she's not as conservative on that issue as you might think (which may actually end up causing a problem with ultra-conservatives):

She opposes same-sex marriage, but she has stated that she has gay friends and is receptive to gay and lesbian concerns about discrimination. While the previous administration did not implement same-sex benefits, Palin complied with a state Supreme Court order and signed them into law...Palin's first veto was used to block legislation that would have barred the state from granting benefits to gay state employees and their partners. In effect, her veto granted State of Alaska benefits to same-sex couples. The veto occurred after Palin consulted with Alaska's attorney general on the constitutionality of the legislation

on preview: same point to orthogonality
posted by pardonyou? at 8:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


This was a really smart move for McCain, as long as she doesn't have something in her past that will come back to bite him.

oops!.

This is a desperation pick folks.
posted by Ironmouth at 8:34 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


P-A-N-D-E-R-I-N-G.
posted by agregoli at 8:36 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


brilliant pick; even more brilliant given the fact that many, many Hillary voters saw Hillary as a step in the direction of women's rights. These voters aren't policy voters; they're visceral voters. That's why people still don't understand why Kerry lost in 2004. Voters are more visceral than most think; instead of fighting that ( like dems do), repulicans embrace it, and win. Our voting populace may be stupid, and we may elect corrupt bastards, but Dems have been so inept at understanding voter thinking that they think they'll win on the issues. McCain has such a great shot now.
posted by SeizeTheDay at 8:36 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


The smartest thing that McCain has done so far. Kudos to him for not selecting the "obvious" choices (Pawlenty, Ridge, etc). Palin brings energy, "youth," interesting background, and personality to the campaign.
posted by davidmsc at 8:38 AM on August 29, 2008


Palin faces probe.

That just sounds naisty!
posted by ColdChef at 8:38 AM on August 29, 2008


>Lots of Rupublican compassion for an extra chromosome, not so much for men born liking show-tunes and cock.

What? Where is this gay gene? Science explains homosexuality as being sourced for a slew of issues and we have seen that twins with identical DNA do not fall into the same sex preference. Its highly highly disingenuous to compare down's syndrome to homosexuality. That doesnt make homosexuality a choice, but we cant keep spreading the convenient lie that its no different than downs or hemophilia for bullshit political points. It makes your side look bad. Real bad.
posted by damn dirty ape at 8:38 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


This is a desperation pick folks.

Well, to be fair, Palin is former a former member of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. So I guess her energy platform will be using flop sweat as a renewable resource.

Good god I am peeing myself waiting for the debate with Biden now.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 8:38 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


This is a new era in American history. No matter who wins, a long-standing barrier will be broken. At long last, a non-contiguous state will be represented in the White House!

If only Eisenhower was still here to see the realization of his beautiful dream. *sniff*
posted by designbot at 8:39 AM on August 29, 2008 [16 favorites]


Source please.

Via Politico:

Larry Kudlow of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Co.” asked her about the possibility of becoming McCain's ticket mate.
Palin replied: “As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

On preview: Rhaomi found the vid.
posted by mjthomas at 8:40 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


I've been carrying on a conversation with my sister all morning about who we wanter to see as McCain's VP. (we're both liberal Democrats.) My best-case scenario for Dems was Palin:

1. The Repubs just lost the "Obama hasn't got the experience" issue,

2. I can't wait to see her head to head against Biden in the debates.

3. I've always thought the PUMA issue was BS. Now McCain looks like he's pandering.
posted by Mcable at 8:40 AM on August 29, 2008


I guess McCain gets to put his "Maverick" hat back on.
posted by ColdChef at 8:41 AM on August 29, 2008


Hey! Here's a female politician it's okay to hate! And she's pretty! Let's break out the sexism!
posted by lunit at 8:43 AM on August 29, 2008 [20 favorites]


It really doesn't matter who John McCain picks.
John McCain could choose a former beauty queen from Alaska as a running mate and he'd still win this election.

Wait...
posted by sour cream at 8:43 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Weird, just weird. So far, this is the most confusing moment in this election cycle.

The effects of this are unpredictable.

It's like Obama upped the ante on the turn last night, forcing McCain, down on chips and with a mediocre hand, to decide whether to give up a substantial pot or gamble and go all in. This is McCain going all in.
posted by C.Batt at 8:44 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


This was a really smart move for McCain

I can't disagree with this more. She is a political lightweight, is in no way qualified to be president, and this decision will completely torpedo John McCain's claim to good judgement and the value of experience. If she makes the mistake of attempting to take Biden on in a debate, she will be utterly humiliated. Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle? Just you wait.
posted by Daddy-O at 8:44 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


On preview: XQUZYPHYR nailed it.
posted by Mcable at 8:44 AM on August 29, 2008


Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle? Just you wait.

I'd love to hear Biden say this: "I knew Dan Quayle. I served in the senate with Dan Quayle. You are no Dan Quayle."
posted by Mcable at 8:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [35 favorites]


On preview: XQUZYPHYR nailed it.

Seriously.
posted by gerryblog at 8:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


when did Alaska become a state? I thought it was still a territory.
posted by Postroad at 8:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


No, this is not good for Biden in the debates.

Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlenty, Biden could have wiped the floor with, no holds barred. But where are people's sympathies going to lie when they see an angry old man yelling at the nice, pretty hockey mom who only had a few weeks to get ready before being thrust into the national spotlight?
posted by designbot at 8:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I guess Susan Collins, Christie Todd Whitman, Oympia Snowe, and Elizabeth Dole were busy.
posted by kirkaracha at 8:48 AM on August 29, 2008 [22 favorites]


"I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the V.P. does every day?"

Well, to be fair no one really knows what the V.P does every day, it's kind of a job you get to define in your own terms with the President. On the one hand you have Cheney, on the other you have Quayle. Some are powerful, some are not.
posted by delmoi at 8:48 AM on August 29, 2008


Or...

"I know Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton is a friend of mine...."
posted by R. Mutt at 8:48 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


Hillary voters saw Hillary as a step in the direction of women's rights. These voters aren't policy voters; they're visceral voters. That's why people still don't understand why Kerry lost in 2004. Voters are more visceral than most think; instead of fighting that ( like dems do), repulicans embrace it, and win.

Hillary voters didn't just vote for a woman, they voted for Hillary Clinton. There's a big difference. Many of them have been following her political career for over a decade, and won't be likely to jump ship to some other woman in politics. If she campaigns strongly against Palin, she has a very good chance of defusing this momentum.

And as far as visceral, GWB won in 2004 off of the Evangelical vote. Many of those same people voted for Huckabee in the primaries this year rather than McCain. And many of those same people probably don't like the idea of having a woman president. I think this pick will lose more voters for McCain than it gains.
posted by burnmp3s at 8:48 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


It's gonna take a lot of popcorn and beer and a real comfortable chair to sit and watch the next few months.....
indeed!
LOL
posted by a3matrix at 8:49 AM on August 29, 2008


pardonyou? writes "on preview: same point to orthogonality"

Point taken, thanks for the correction.

But note I said "Republican compassion", not "Palin's compassion". Now, since she's pro-life but doesn't hate the gays, so it'll be interesting to see how the Fundies (who don't much like McCain) react to his choice. If he's gained Hillary dead-endrs with Palin but further eroded th Republican base's support, is this a net gain?

I mean, the Fundie base will man your phonebanks and vote. I can't see most of the Hillary dead-enders (other than the public faces of PUMA, who are probably mainly Republican operatives anyway) manning, er, womanning the phone banks. They might vote McCain to spite Obama, but they aren't going to make phone calls for an anti-choice candidate.
posted by orthogonality at 8:49 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I can't fathom anyone actually buying into this crap. What a joke.
posted by fusinski at 8:50 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


What a weird choice. An unknown, inexperienced woman from the back of beyond, tainted with the whiff of scandal.

The Republicans either don't want to be elected (can't blame them; the mess that needs to be cleaned up is horrifying) or are so cock-sure about cheating themselves into rule that they can mock the electorate.
posted by five fresh fish at 8:52 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


She is a political lightweight...

One wonders how fast she'll be on her feet in front of the national press. Can she take a curveball with both feet out of her mouth?
posted by DU at 8:52 AM on August 29, 2008


But, can she spell 'potato?'
posted by ericb at 8:52 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."


"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"
posted by Atom Eyes at 8:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [37 favorites]


Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina, and Condoleeza Rice were busy, too.
posted by kirkaracha at 8:54 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Good god I am peeing myself waiting for the debate with Biden now.

I was thinking the exact same thing. His experience and ability to quickly cut deep with his words? It's going to be like watching a fight between an attack dog and a balloon.
posted by quin at 8:54 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


If Hilary campaigns against Palin, going on record as to why Palin is no substitute for herself and that one is better to vote Obama, I doubt there's going to be much crossover voting.
posted by five fresh fish at 8:56 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


But where are people's sympathies going to lie when they see an angry old man yelling at the nice, pretty hockey mom who only had a few weeks to get ready before being thrust into the national spotlight?

There is no way he'll yell. He won't intimidate and he won't push hard. Quiet gravitas and appeals to experience, the very themes McCain has been hammering home as essential to this election, will be enough to wilt this pick.

Seriously, you have to wonder what these people are thinking. They push the celebrity line and then McCain undercuts it with his seven homes stumble. They push the experience line and McCain undercuts it by picking a running mate with next to no experience. The underlying anxiety about his candidacy is his age and his fading faculties, a concern which is only exacerbated by this choice. Obama is making decisive moves. He's building an organization and addressing his weaknesses on the national stage. Against that, McCain's campaign begins to look very small.

Also, how can Palin ever hope to fill this suit?
posted by felix betachat at 8:58 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Why is everyone assuming she'll do so poorly in the debates? Because she's a pretty woman?
posted by Perplexity at 8:58 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


lunit: Wow. If there was any doubt that this whole election is about identity politics, that's pretty much gone now.

In spite of the disagreeable fractiousness of identity politics, which feels like the play-at-home version of corporate special interests, I sense something else in picks like this - a refined political theater that decouples the identity from the politics. That they can win public approval by fulfilling the pattern of "first woman X" without substantively bending to any associated policy is now obvious to them - I submit the Bush administration's very own Black female Secretary of State. Others have already pointed out Palin's stance on abortion.

It's worse than voting for someone who looks like me because I expect preferential representation. It's voting for someone who looks like me for the sympathetic magic, for the drama, for the vicarious hell of it.
posted by kid ichorous at 8:59 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


"All the presidents and VPs in US history have been white and male."

Yes, and if I'm remembering right, so have all the first ladies. Palin's husband is Yupik.
posted by merelyglib at 8:59 AM on August 29, 2008


As long as Biden can maintain the "hate the sin, not the sinner" approach that was (imho) well established during the convention, he ought to be able to attack her as firmly on the issues as he would've Romney or Pawlenty.
posted by feloniousmonk at 9:00 AM on August 29, 2008


Why is everyone assuming she'll do so poorly in the debates? Because she's a pretty woman?

Why do you assume that's the only basis on which to doubt her performance in the debates?
posted by felix betachat at 9:00 AM on August 29, 2008 [26 favorites]


Here's a female politician it's okay to hate! And she's pretty! Let's break out the sexism!

Suggesting that someone is sexist because they don't like the Anti-Choice, creationist person who counts a beauty contest as election experience is like saying that because you don't care for Obama's healthcare plan, you are a racist.
posted by ColdChef at 9:00 AM on August 29, 2008 [57 favorites]


I just took two minutes out of my day to read up on her bio: this person has never had a job. Either this is a joke, or the GOP brass are the only ones in the know that the occupants of the White House are merely trade representatives of USA, Inc., and when it comes to peddling crap, it's better to offer something better to look at than your competition.
posted by jsavimbi at 9:01 AM on August 29, 2008


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"


"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"
posted by ericbop at 9:01 AM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


All the first ladies have been white males?! Well, that explains Eleanor Roosevelt.
posted by ColdChef at 9:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Quite frankly, I found her quoted response about her child in the Wikipedia article:


"I'm looking at him right now, and I see perfection," Palin said. "Yeah, he has an extra chromosome. I keep thinking, in our world, what is normal and what is perfect?"


To be quite inspiring.


Apart from the amazing and apparently unself-conscious irony of this statement in the mouth of a beauty pageant contestant, I'd be more inclined to agree if it weren't for the fact that all people with Down syndrome develop Alzheimer disease in ther forties or early fifties.
posted by jamjam at 9:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I gather she hates bears.

She's 100% on the side of oil drillers with keeping polar bears off the endangered species list.

Sufficed to say, Palin will not be getting The Sierra Club's endorsement.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 9:02 AM on August 29, 2008


This is a really poor choice, IMO. Disgruntled PUMA's were going to vote for McCain anyway, and voters who wanted Clinton because of her history of "being a fighter" and a champion of women's rights are not going to be pleased with obvious pandering. Anyone who has the least concern about electing a 72 year old President is not going to be comforted by the thought of a former Alaskan governor with hardly any experience running the country. I think the campaign shot itself in the foot.
posted by oneirodynia at 9:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"

"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"


Nome?

No sir, we do not. That's why we're asking you.
posted by felix betachat at 9:03 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


oops!.

Are you kidding me? The possible "scandal" is that she might — might — have abused her authority to try to get a cop who drove drunk on the job and tasered his 11-year-old kid fired. I'm sure people are going to be really fucking up in arms over that one. Come the fuck on. If it comes out during the campaign that she did do it, watch her positives jump as the campaign frames her as being hounded by meddling Democratic investigators for taking a bad cop off the street and if she had to bend a few rules to do it, well, that's just how effing mavericky she is ain't it?

Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle? Just you wait.

You mean former vice president Dan Quayle? The guy who won?

Or, what onlyconnect said.
posted by enn at 9:03 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


I wouldn't be surprised if someone in the Obama campaign suggested preparing an ad with the video of Palin saying she needs someone to tell her what the VP does and the suggestion was shot down because no way would McCain make such a poor choice.

The Hillary supporters are going to be insulted that McCain made such a bad choice just to pander to women. I'm glad that Obama didn't pick Hillary as his VP, but it would have been killer diller to watch Hillary smash Palin in such a one sided debate.
posted by Daddy-O at 9:03 AM on August 29, 2008


Why is everyone assuming she'll do so poorly in the debates? Because she's a pretty woman?

Yes, it's entirely a sexist thing, and has nothing to do with her lack of experience. Now quick, use the widest brush you have to tar "the left" for being sexist.

Is it December yet?
posted by Remy at 9:03 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I heard that there are so few women in Alaska that a "ten" is a four that brings a six-pack.
posted by Bitter soylent at 9:04 AM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


Trophy running mate? To go with the trophy wife, no?
posted by Mental Wimp at 9:05 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I can't believe how many apparent Lefties on this site are so eager to trip over themselves in anguish over this "brilliant" move, like McCain has somehow locked up the election or something with this move.

As XQUZYPHYR said, "Really?"

Looks like a desperation move to me. What's she bringing to the table other than "woman"? And how is this pick going to bring the Evangelical Right, who already dislike McCain, back into the fold?

Folks, this election is not even going to be close. Mark my words.
posted by mkultra at 9:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


What are the other reasons? Why would lack of experience correlate with being bad at debating?
posted by Perplexity at 9:06 AM on August 29, 2008


[I]t is clear to me that Metafilter is so partisan that it can't really view election issues clearly or with any distance. This was a really smart move for McCain, as long as she doesn't have something in her past that will come back to bite him. This next week and the Republican convention might be tough for Democrats.

Palin was named on Veep lists (and future Pres. lists) a year or two ago, but not recently at all. From a purely pragmatic and political standpoint, the female Veep possibilities were "supposed" to be either Meg Whitman or Kay Bailey Hutchinson. The conventional wisdom has been that Palin was off the table because of her ongoing ethics scandal, it would grossly highlight's McCain's age, fallout from McCain's own hammering Obama on the experience/"ready to lead" issue would land on her as well, she adds little following, name-recognition, or clout to the ticket other than being fairly unobjectionable to the Republican base, and Palin herself has not made any deliberate play for or even demonstrated any interest in the position given that she's been busy taking care of her newborn. In short, she was eliminated from virtually all political insiders' first-tier picks for many, many reasons when she was looked at under cold, objective light a number of months ago. "Smart" is definitely overstating the case for choosing Palin, but "desperate" is being too uncharitable. Let's call a spade a spade: Palin as the VP pick would be extremely risky. I think a pick like this would say more about the McCain camp's own view of their current position, the other VP possibilities, and the expected trajectory of the rest of the campaign than anything else.

It's not the team sitting on a safe lead that calls for a Hail Mary -- but then again, the play's been known to win many a game. It's not exactly a smart play, but not quite as desperate as an onside kick or faked punt, either. It's a risky, usually unsuccessful maneuver that occasionally reaps massive dividends. Palin means McCain is a gambling man.
posted by DaShiv at 9:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [61 favorites]


An awful lot of you seem to be assuming that women voters are shallow idiots, and that PUMAs are more than an invention of Fox News.
posted by QIbHom at 9:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [29 favorites]


But (imho, of course) it's completely distasteful to criticize her for wanting to have children, or for having the misfortunate to have a disabled child.

I think the really pertinent thing here is that her fifth child was born in April 2008, and she returned to work just three days after giving birth.

Obama has been a strong critic of the fact that the US is basically the only "first world" nation that fails to provide paid leave for new mothers. I have to wonder what Palin's view on parental leave is, given the example she's set that basically says to mothers "hey, its not that hard. Just go back to work. You can do it if you try hard enough."
posted by anastasiav at 9:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


A seemingly brilliant move, but in reality, a 100% cynical choice.
posted by interrobang at 9:07 AM on August 29, 2008


Well, if nothing else this clarifies the contours of the crossroads America's arrived at. So which path will it be, America? Which version of yourself will you embrace in this dark hour? Are you the keepers of the bright and perpetual flame of enlightenment values and constitutional democracy, or are you a reality TV show cast handing out free junk food?
posted by gompa at 9:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


zardoz: Her decision to have a child in the first place
It is quite likely that she did not decide to have a child, but that she became pregnant. It happens. Whatever the case, it is non of our business. Did you remark on the number of McCains children, and the fact that it is risky to have a child at a later age as a father (he was 55) in the threads about his nomination?

I found your Did she not get the memo about the high chance of Down's Syndrome for babies born by older (over 35 I believe) women? incredibly offensive. What exactly do you mean? Women who are older than 35 should not have children? Children with Down's syndrome should not exist? Women who get a child with Down syndrome are somehow stupid?
posted by davar at 9:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [28 favorites]


It's like Obama upped the ante on the turn last night, forcing McCain, down on chips and with a mediocre hand ...

What on earth are you talking about, "down on chips"?
For all I know, the media are yapping about how McCain closed the gap in the polls despite the Democratic convention and might be even leading now (although personally, I don't trust the polls and think they are one half skewed and the other half made up on the fly). He's poised to win.

quin on Biden: His experience and ability to quickly cut deep with his words? It's going to be like watching a fight between an attack dog and a balloon.

And this is why Biden will lose the debates. Nobody likes the attack dog who picked on the pretty girl. It's a situation where Biden cannot possibly score any points. Not that it matters much, since noone would choose Obama just because his VP candidate did good on the debates anyway. The situation is different for McCain, though, since there are enough idiots in the US that will make their choice solely based on gender, race or sexual history of the candidate, completely irregardless of their policy. The Republicans have figured this out better than the Dems.
posted by sour cream at 9:08 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Why is everyone assuming she'll do so poorly in the debates? Because she's a pretty woman?

No, it's because she doesn't have much experience and doesn't seem to know what the VP even does. That's 10th grade Government class basics, and she wants to BE the VP? Holy cow, McCain is DONE.
posted by Daddy-O at 9:09 AM on August 29, 2008


I also think the pick reflects McCain's intense displeasure at being upstaged by anyone, particularly his VP choice.

And how is this pick going to bring the Evangelical Right, who already dislike McCain, back into the fold?

Sarah Palin thinks creationism should be taught alongside evolution in schools. She's anti-choice. This is definitely a fundie pander as well.
posted by oneirodynia at 9:09 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I was going to write something, but XQUZYPHYR, wrote it for me.
posted by rmmcclay at 9:09 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


More and more, I think the Republican party is deliberately throwing this election. They don't want to do the dirty work of cleaning up after Bush. It's going to be a difficult, costly, unpopular job, and I bet they're counting on the pain it causes to be such that it destroys the Democrats chances for re-election. They're giving up four years in return for twenty.

The same seems to be happening in Canada. The Reeeeeform party is out for blood, the intention being to wholly destroy our centrist Liberal party, turning this into a two-party state of extreme right and extreme left views.
posted by five fresh fish at 9:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [18 favorites]


Why is everyone assuming she'll do so poorly in the debates? Because she's a pretty woman?

Remy beat me to it, but it has nothing to do with the fact that she's a woman and everything to do with Biden having 35 years of experience as an elected official versus her eighteen or so months. Also, Biden has proven repeatedly that he can verbally eviscerate his opposition even when they have years of practice, so unless she has some kind of hidden debate-jujitsu, I'm betting she doesn't fare well against him.
posted by quin at 9:13 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Sour cream: "..completely irregardless of their policy."

Fail.
posted by shiu mai baby at 9:13 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


this feels a little bit like george mc govern's search for a vice presidential candidate in 1968: ted kennedy declined, sargent shriver was out of reach, walter mondale also said no, abe ribicoff had better things to do, kevin white was vetoed, walter cronkite wasn't asked until it was too late, gaylord nelson refused and by this time around it was down to the guy running the ice cream truck down the street and some obscure senater named tom eagleton nobody seemed to know all that well. we all know how that story turned out: words like landslide and electro-shock-therapy have been used more often than I care to recount.

so, dearest barack: you may have a funny name, you may be black, you may be against abortion, you may have a real problem with the hillary crowd but the republicans seem to have acquired a taste for that old dance the democrats have very nearly perfected since the days of good old hapless george mc govern. you may be hopeful.

and so am I.
posted by krautland at 9:13 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Is the Clinton thing all he's got?
posted by Artw at 9:14 AM on August 29, 2008


An awful lot of you seem to be assuming that women voters are shallow idiots

If the shoe fits…
posted by designbot at 9:14 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle? Just you wait.

You mean former vice president Dan Quayle? The guy who won?


George H W Bush won in spite of picking Quayle as VP. Remember?
posted by Daddy-O at 9:15 AM on August 29, 2008


"brilliant pick; even more brilliant given the fact that many, many Hillary voters saw Hillary as a step in the direction of women's rights. These voters aren't policy voters; they're visceral voters." SeizeTheDay

Agreed. But I don't know why everyone's so quick to hate on or even be surprised by the "visceral" women; look at Obama's 90+ to 1 margin among black voters. Is the tribal nature of our politics so surprising to us that we can't move past it?
posted by resurrexit at 9:16 AM on August 29, 2008


damn... for abortion. I don't even get their pseudo-arguments listed right.
I need more sleep.
posted by krautland at 9:16 AM on August 29, 2008


For all I know, the media are yapping about how McCain closed the gap in the polls despite the Democratic convention and might be even leading now (although personally, I don't trust the polls and think they are one half skewed and the other half made up on the fly). He's poised to win.


I don't understand this- McCain's not leading the polls at the moment; convention bounce (if any) won't really be seen until Monday. 78% of women don't know who the heck Sarah Palin is. There hasn't been a single debate, and yet you can confidently state three months before the election that McCain is poised to win?
posted by oneirodynia at 9:17 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Suggesting that someone is sexist because they don't like the Anti-Choice, creationist person who counts a beauty contest as election experience...

Ah, but that's not what I suggested. I was referring to how quickly the thread filled with sex jokes. This knee-jerk defensiveness thing is old.
posted by lunit at 9:17 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


George H W Bush won in spite of picking Quayle as VP. Remember?

YES. YESYESYES. Oh my god yes.
posted by krautland at 9:17 AM on August 29, 2008


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"

"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"

Nome?

No sir, we do not. That's why we're asking you.


"Fairbanks."

"Senator McCain, there will be time to discuss your financial policies later. I'm asking about your VP selection."
posted by pardonyou? at 9:19 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle?

No, I think Lloyd Bentsen did it. And still lost by 7 million votes and an 80/20 split of the electoral college. She's a lightweight, yes, but bad VP choices don't lose you an election. Perot grabbed nearly 20 million votes in spite of Stockdale's embarrassing performance.

Her abysmal qualifications only means the bar will be set so incredibly low that not killing herself tripping over it will be seen as a monumental achievement. OK, so McCain has put Eddie Gaedel up to bat for him. The Dems can't strike her out. And if she does happen to even touch the ball, it's a veritable home run.
posted by GhostintheMachine at 9:19 AM on August 29, 2008


Am I the only one thinking he is going for Laura Roslin and the BSG vote?
posted by well_balanced at 9:19 AM on August 29, 2008 [13 favorites]


No, it's because she doesn't have much experience and doesn't seem to know what the VP even does.

That's not what she said. She said she doesn't know what a VP does from day to day. That's very different from not knowing what a VP's constitutional functions are, and is really not all that ignorant of a question--given the complete lack of powers given to the Vice President by the Constitution, the issue of spending your time usefully is certainly real.
posted by nasreddin at 9:19 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


George H W Bush won in spite of picking Quayle as VP. Remember?

Food for thought. If it hadn't been for H. Ross Perot, Dan Quayle may well have been just settling into his 2nd term as President on 9/11/01.
posted by loquax at 9:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


And this is why Biden will lose the debates. Nobody likes the attack dog who picked on the pretty girl.

I hadn't considered this angle, but I don't think I completely agree. People have argued for so long that Democrats are soft and ineffectual, it would be a huge tonal shift for them to suddenly argue that the Dems are playing too rough.

Not saying they won't try it, though.
posted by quin at 9:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I'm surprised there are no baby boomers in this election. All the candidates were either born before 1945 or after 1960 (Obama is "technically" a baby boomer but he gives the impression of someone younger than 47). You would think this election would have baby boomers represented as they approach 60 and should be at the height of experience without being too old.

I wonder if those middle-aged Hillary supporters will like Palin or will they see someone who is closer in age to Lewinsky than them.
posted by bobo123 at 9:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


>Is the tribal nature of our politics so surprising to us that we can't move past it?

Absolutely. Humans will never move past it. its our nature. Never underestime a swing or sometimes voter with something in common with a candidate.
posted by damn dirty ape at 9:20 AM on August 29, 2008


For those of you not old enough to have been there, the prevailing thought on the Quayle selection was that he was assassination insurance. People would think twice about killing the President when they saw who was next in line. There were no age or disease issues with George Bush, so the fact that Quayle was inexperienced and generally seen as a silver spooned buffoon wasn't really an issue. He did provide a young face to the ticket, and that was an advantage to counter Bush's experience.
posted by Eekacat at 9:21 AM on August 29, 2008


Think John Connally eviscerated Dan Quayle?

No, I think Lloyd Bentsen did it.


Duh.
posted by Daddy-O at 9:22 AM on August 29, 2008


So I will give the Canadian guy view - I am only and observer, but I am damn sure not neutral.

For people talking about debates, I think Joe Biden is in tough because its going to be a lot harder for him to go on the attack without looking like a jerk. That said, I am not sure the VP debate matters - hard core Republicans who have stuck with them through these last few years are clearly not people who think deep; nothing Biden/Palin could say would change their minds. If Biden plays it safe, and doesn't do anything to alienate his base he can't lose. Biden just has to play defence, and Palin would need a knockout to gain anything.

Last night also showed that when Barack Obama decides to go on offence he can do it with an impressive level of precision and authority, his acceptance speech was notable for a number of reason - he is perhaps the best speaker of his generation. Barack can clearly be his own attack dog, if he needs to be and Biden really only needs to face off agains Palin once, so its not that hard to dodge.

I don't see this Palin move as a factor. First, Palin's home base is geographically isolated. While Palin may pick off a few Hilary supporters, but I suspect the number of truly disaffected Hilary supporters has been overcounted and magnified by media coverage. Otherwise the Palin selection is a move to appeal to Republican supports, who want to cling to the idea that the Repubs can be fresh-looking, younger, and interesting too but have sufficient powers of denial to ignore the other advantages of the democratic ticket. Palin only becomes a true mainstream political asset on the vote-getting front if she publically declares herself to be anti-war, and talks about being a dove to balance McCain's hawk; I don't see that happening.

My prediction today is the same as it was last week. Obama takes the presidential election, by something like 52%-48%. I somehow think a lot of people who normally vote Republican will stay home on election day.
posted by Deep Dish at 9:22 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


More and more, I think the Republican party is deliberately throwing this election.

Could well be. On the other hand, hype aside, you could almost think the same of the democrats. I mean to say, it should be shoo in for them, and yet the polls do not show a trouncing.

Then again, such a strategy might really be beyond the Men In The Smoke Filled Room. It's not like the old days. Too many ambitious people who really do want to be president.

the prevailing thought on the Quayle selection was that he was assassination insurance.

Could be true, but for such an outrageous statement, we really do want a citation. "Prevailing thought" too vague.
posted by IndigoJones at 9:24 AM on August 29, 2008


You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama. There's absolutely no way that she would find the idea of a republican female president heartwarming. I think the Obama campaign is pretty pleased with this choice.
posted by oneirodynia at 9:24 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Does the VP do something from day to day?
posted by Artw at 9:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


FFF...I've been saying the same thing for a long time now. Yeah, it's beyond cynical, but it really does fall in-line with the sort of calculations I've come to expect from the Rove-era GOP.
posted by Thorzdad at 9:27 AM on August 29, 2008


I think she's a poor choice and torpedoes McCain's attack line on experience (particularly given his own age and dodgy health) but I don't think the VP line is particularly bad.

VPs have in the past taken on different roles, and in context she was trying to do the politician thing of disclaiming a suggested job without implying she didn't want it.
posted by athenian at 9:27 AM on August 29, 2008


Not according to Sarah Palin:

In an interview just a month ago, she dissed the job, saying it didn’t seem “productive.”

In fact, she said she doesn’t know what the vice president does.

Larry Kudlow of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Co.” asked her about the possibility of becoming McCain's ticket mate.

Palin replied: “As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

posted by oneirodynia at 9:28 AM on August 29, 2008


"especially for Alaskans"?

So what's the general feel for Alaska, are they seen as crazy right-wing pork addicts?
posted by Artw at 9:30 AM on August 29, 2008


Am I the only one thinking he is going for Laura Roslin and the BSG vote?

No, Margaret Spellings will be president when the robot revolution comes.
posted by designbot at 9:30 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama. There's absolutely no way that she would find the idea of a republican female president heartwarming. I think the Obama campaign is pretty pleased with this choice.

If that makes you feel good, ok. I don't see it though.
posted by JohnnyGunn at 9:31 AM on August 29, 2008


I can't help but think this is part of some bigger GOP plan. Have the dems focus on her inexperience and then after a few weeks she decides she cannot be the VP candidate because family comes first or something else. Then they go after Obama's inexperience again using quotes from dems about her inexperience. Or something like that. It just seems like such a desperate move.
posted by batou_ at 9:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


* munches popcorn *

Goddamn, I do love being an American.

But sometimes I am not sure why.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 9:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Jesus tap-dancing Christ. If McCain wanted a former beauty queen with no experience and a criminal investigation on her record I don’t know why he didn’t just pick his own wife.

Like many other goods lines I pick up here, that one is so good I will shamelessly steal it and re-use it elsewhere. ;-)
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 9:34 AM on August 29, 2008 [16 favorites]


You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama. There's absolutely no way that she would find the idea of a republican female president heartwarming. I think the Obama campaign is pretty pleased with this choice.

If that makes you feel good, ok. I don't see it though.


So, you think Clinton will be pleased about the thought of Sarah Palin being closer in line to the presidency than she was, just by default of being chosen as the anti-Obama news item?
posted by oneirodynia at 9:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I liked Bailey Hutchinson, maybe she had some skeletons that made her a bad choice, I don't know. Palin's a gamble because, obviously, it's silly to select her for a ticket that has made the other side's "inexperience" a huge issue, but if you seriously think that the media will call bullshit on the next thre months of McCain hammering Obama for being inexperienced, you're either too naive or blinded by wishful thinking.

George ""I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun" Bush and Dick "other priorities" Cheney, two proven draft dodgers (Cheney even bragged about it), were allowed by the media to slam with impunity people like Kerry, Murtha, and poor Max Cleland who had actually gone to war (and in Clelend's case, left a few limbs there).

the media, that in a functioning democracy is supposed to be the ref, thought it O.K. and allowed the draft dodgers to cover the veterans in lies (Swift Boat and otherwise).

If you think the media will point out the bad faith in McCain's slamming Obama's inexperience these next three months, think again. unless there's a provable scandal that can damage her, Palin's home free. she has a Down syndrome baby, if you attack her you not only are a baby-killer but you also hate babies with Down syndrome. and those of you who hope she's clueless, she can't be more clueless than Dan Quayle. and Bush I / Quayle won in '88.
posted by matteo at 9:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [11 favorites]


Does the VP do something from day to day?

Well, I read she is in the NRA and likes hunting so she can keep up the tradition of the VP shooting people in the face every now and then.
posted by starzero at 9:36 AM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD. Her voice isn't that far off from "Will & Grace's" Karen Walker!!!!

Anastasia Beaverhausen for VP!!!! (.wav file)
posted by matty at 9:36 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think a pick like this would say more about the McCain camp's own view of their current position, the other VP possibilities, and the expected trajectory of the rest of the campaign than anything else.

And possibly what the other VP possibilites' view of the expected trajectory. I wonder if even Romney, let alone Pawlenty, want the WH badly enough to get McCain/Bush all over their clean names.
posted by DU at 9:37 AM on August 29, 2008


She has a 5 month old baby. I don't think most women relate to having a 5 month old, returning to work 3 days later, and then running for VP.
posted by cell divide at 9:38 AM on August 29, 2008


Um, and it's not about me "feeling good". If you've got a good argument for why Clinton won't campaign harder, say so. I'm not making stuff up to post here in order to "feel good".
posted by oneirodynia at 9:38 AM on August 29, 2008


heh, I meant to say, "having a child, returning to work 3 days later, and 5 months later running for VP".
posted by cell divide at 9:38 AM on August 29, 2008


She's on CNN now (and here; she's got a really weird speaking voice. I guess that's what an Alaskan accent sounds like.
posted by designbot at 9:39 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"

"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"

Nome?

No sir, we do not. That's why we're asking you.

"Fairbanks."

"Senator McCain, there will be time to discuss your financial policies later. I'm asking about your VP selection."


"What was the question again?"

[fuming] "Listen. Let me put it to you this way: the people who come from this place—they must call themselves something. What's the word they use to refer to themselves?"

"Inuit."

"Good. I suppose you wouldn't mind sharing it with me, then?"

"Eskimo."

"I'm not interviewing Moe—I'm asking you!"
posted by Atom Eyes at 9:39 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Ah, this must be why people are winding up at my blog's review of Sarah Plain and Tall by searching for "Sarah Plain". Palin, people, Palin.
posted by orange swan at 9:40 AM on August 29, 2008 [18 favorites]


Metafilter: post made up stuff here to "feel good"
posted by Artw at 9:40 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


STOP CLAPPING INTO THE MIKE
posted by designbot at 9:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


http://www.vpilf.com/
posted by nitsuj at 9:42 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


IT'S A TRAP!

If the left thinks they can attack her on the fact that she's some backwoods breeder they are going to step in it with "middle America."

How dare the left attack this woman for choosing to bring a new (if retarded) life into this world! How dare the left attack her small town values!

The left is out of touch, elitist, effete, and beholden to ivory towers socialists and inner city welfare leeches and their attacks on Palin just confirm this!

Who will keep us safe? The party of the welfare queens, the queers, and the baby killers? Or the party of the vets, the frontiersmen (and women) and those who recognize that family is the foundation of our society!

Not a genius move, but theirs is a party that neither desires nor respects genius...
posted by wfrgms at 9:42 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


How tough will Joe Biden be able to get on her in the debate without people calling him a sexist pig?

As a feminist and supporter of full equal rights for pretty much everyone, I say, "eviscerate the shit out of her".

Also, McCain is a known skirt chaser who left his former-beauty-queen wife for a younger, might-as-well-be-former-beauty-queen heiress, and now wants to make a younger former beauty queen his #2. You want to talk about fucked up sexual dynamics? It's not Biden anyone has to worry about.
posted by mkultra at 9:42 AM on August 29, 2008 [31 favorites]


I can't help but think this is part of some bigger GOP plan. Have the dems focus on her inexperience and then after a few weeks she decides she cannot be the VP candidate because family comes first or something else. Then they go after Obama's inexperience again using quotes from dems about her inexperience. Or something like that. It just seems like such a desperate move.

My paranoid thought is she could be another Harriet Miers - an inappropriate candidate tossed out as a possibility (and a distraction), then later pulled back in favor of the person who was the "real" candidate all along.
posted by yhbc at 9:44 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"

"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"

Nome?

No sir, we do not. That's why we're asking you.

"Fairbanks."

"Senator McCain, there will be time to discuss your financial policies later. I'm asking about your VP selection."

"What was the question again?"

[fuming] "Listen. Let me put it to you this way: the people who come from this place—they must call themselves something. What's the word they use to refer to themselves?"

"Inuit."

"Good. I suppose you wouldn't mind sharing it with me, then?"

"Eskimo."

"I'm not interviewing Moe—I'm asking you!"


"So, Senator, is it true you picked Gov. Palin as a pandering move to women voters?"

"Denali."
posted by shiu mai baby at 9:44 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


mkultra - Ugh. Creepy. And it's about that time in his breeding cycle, things could go very wrong.
posted by Artw at 9:44 AM on August 29, 2008


Ouch:
I don't know Dan Quayle. But I hope that whatever golf course he's on, he's duly offended by the day's frequent comparisons between John McCain's frantic selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate and his own selection in 1988. Let's look at the record:

* Quayle: Two terms in the U.S. House, eight years in the U.S. Senate, representing a state of 6.5 million people.

* Palin: City council member and mayor of a town of 8,500 people, 20 months as governor of a state of 650,000 people.

No, Governor Palin, you're no Dan Quayle. Maybe in a few years.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 9:45 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


Wait - the Harriet Miers thing was deliberate? What did it gain them?
posted by Artw at 9:45 AM on August 29, 2008


Holy Christ McCain is going to get fucking stomped
posted by i_am_a_Jedi at 9:46 AM on August 29, 2008


Let the VPILF jokes begin.

Meh. Give me Jennifer Granholm or Stephanie Herseth any day.

Or Margaret Thatcher. What, you don't think power is sexy? Tell me you don't think power is sexy.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 9:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


she's got a really weird speaking voice

Really??? Sounds pretty normal to me. Certainly not the flat tv-announcer voice, but just sounds like most other regular folks. Of course, I am from Michigan, which is famous for its distinctive high-throated/nasal accent. And I now live in Montana, which is not as distinctive, and which I have probably acclimated to.

In any case, I wouldn't have the immediate reaction that she has a "weird" speaking voice. It's certainly less grating than some others.
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 9:47 AM on August 29, 2008


McCain picks a pro-life, pro-second amendment, fiscal conservative, and current governor for VP. Sounds pretty normal.

Oh, and she's an attractive woman. OMG METAFILTER RAAAAAAAAAGE!!!

I thought the Republicans were supposed to be the male chauvinists.
posted by jsonic at 9:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Or Margaret Thatcher. What, you don't think power is sexy? Tell me you don't think power is sexy.

If you're, you know, into that whole dominatrix/GMILF thing.

you know who you are
posted by kittens for breakfast at 9:49 AM on August 29, 2008


You know, male democrats who don't get the whole Hillary Clinton thing have been pissing off female democrats who do during the entire primary season.

Lead Hillary off with all the tough debate questions and send a few easy ones to Obama, and then if the Hillary camp complains call them whining complainers.

Market a bunch of sexist products that make fun of Hillary (where no one would dare do the same thing to Obama), and have a bunch of media talking heads say awful sexist things to her, and then say her camp is a bunch of whiners and complainers when they speak up about it.

Once Obama has effectively won the primary, make it clear that he is not going to seriously consider her for VP, and don't let us know why, and pick some stuffy old white guy instead. Okay, fine.

Then, at the convention, when she more than any other losing candidate in history comes out and supports Obama and tells her voters to get out there and support Obama through a really moving speech, pick it apart and say that she didn't do enough, she wasn't really sincere, she should have talked more about why he is qualified to be president.

And now, when McCain surprises a large portion of americans who thought he was going to pick some old rich white dude as his VP but instead picks a "youngish" (mid-forties) woman (again, supposedly the most popular governor in America and known as a serious reformer), bust out jokes about how she was a beauty queen and how dumb she must be and how ridiculously political this move is. And how dumb it is to pick your VP just to go after the female vote.

It seems to me like a bunch of male democrats have been underestimating the importance of the female vote for a pretty serious stretch of time here. Maybe this will work out for McCain and maybe it won't. But you might do better with a little less derision and a little more understanding for what these women are on about. You think she got elected Governor of Alaska -- a state full of men -- because she is pretty? Whatever. This is really disappointing.
posted by onlyconnect at 9:49 AM on August 29, 2008 [40 favorites]


Just after Palin's speech a Fox News commentator read the Democratic response, which was basically that it was unseemly to have a person who has only been governor for two years and the mayor of a town of 8,000 a "heartbeat away from the presidency".

Immediately followed by:

ALERT:
OBAMA CAMPAIGN DISSES PALIN FOR SMALL-TOWN ORIGINS


Seriously.
posted by Rhaomi at 9:50 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I get the experience meme now. That insight is like a kick in the gut. I know Obama's record, so I always just wrote off the problem of experience. But now, the problem of experience actually applies, and it's terrifying.

I'm going to have an honest question for my Republican friends that I know love this country: what if McCain dies?

I do not think this is terrifying because Palin is a woman, or a beauty queen, or a mother. None of those are close to reasons to think she cannot do the job. It's going to be sickening once those attacks start, from the right or from the left. (Republicans don't have the monopoly on sexism, and I'm afraid of the attacks that are going to come from Democrats.) I believe the time is way overdue for a woman to get into office. But the sad fact of our past and current sexism does nothing to change the fact that she is not presidential material. The very worst part of this is that so many women are presidential material and they got passed over because she's an easy choice. She tows the party line, betraying her fellow women on the issues that count.

The problem with picking a woman for purely political purposes is a deep one. It confirms that the movers and shakers in the Republican political machine have nothing but contempt for women. "Yes, we were mean to you, but look, we got you this shiny handbag, just for you..."

This terrifies me because so much is riding on this election. Only a historic choice will do. I want a woman in office, but please, not one that doesn't even know what the job entails. Not one chosen in the cynical and desperate spirit of demographic politics.
posted by dosterm at 9:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [37 favorites]


I have to wonder what Palin's view on parental leave is, given the example she's set that basically says to mothers "hey, its not that hard. Just go back to work. You can do it if you try hard enough."

@anastasiav would you prefer if she were against paid leave and took a 90 day break herself? Be a sport and at least praise her for walking the talk - that is, if she IS against paid leaves, which I believe you're just speculating and it's all bullshit. Just another opportunity to put Obama in a good light by comparison.
posted by falameufilho at 9:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'm really looking forward to the VP debates. Biden won't attack Palin, he'll attack John McCain, and she'll look helpless trying to respond. Biden doesn't have to say anything about her at all, and he can attack McCain with a smile on his face. It's a demographic ploy to shore up the evangelical base and try to lure Clinton voters, pure and simple. All Hillary has to do is come out strongly against Palin; she will. I think this choice is a big win for the Obama campaign; it's the sort of move that would have worked against Kerry and his Ineffectual Hamster Wheel Campaign of No Hope, but Obama and his people play in the big leagues.
posted by Kwine at 9:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


Palin's husband is Yupik.
Yupik?
No, you pick!
posted by lukemeister at 9:54 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


onlyconnect: "supposedly the most popular governor in America and known as a serious reformer), bust out jokes about how she was a beauty queen and how dumb she must be and how ridiculously political this move is. And how dumb it is to pick your VP just to go after the female vote.

Honestly, I could give a flying shit about her being a beauty queen or having done a lot of cover shoots. As long as she governs well, who cares?

What I could care about is why the hell McCain picked someone who's had no foreign policy experience, no national domestic experience, and 18 months of statewide domestic (gubernatorial) experience to serve as backup for a 72-year-old cancer survivor's Presidency. I'd feel similarly if we were talking about Gov. Samuel Palin, if he had these credentials.
posted by WCityMike at 9:55 AM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]



Not sure if this has been said yet, but it strikes me that it this is to throw a wrench in the works of Biden's debate performance. He's going to have to pull his punches with a woman, believe it or not. This strikes me as a pretty crass and cynical pick for VP. Of course the GOP would pick a woman VP without any substance whatsoever, a dolled up pretty-faced hack. They'd have done better with one of those blond women on CNBC.
posted by bukharin at 9:55 AM on August 29, 2008


just heard her speech: She sounds like one of the ladies from Prairie Home Companion. Genius, pure genius.
posted by elwoodwiles at 9:57 AM on August 29, 2008


Man, I just want to hear the dialogue between Fleischman and O'Connell about this. He'd say something about how she's not competent to be president, and she'd take it as sexist, and then he'd have to dig himself out of a hole. Then, a couple of seasons later, they'd fuck. Off-camera, of course. Ah, man *wipes away a tear* good times, good times.

Too bad Ruth-Anne never ran for governor.
posted by Eideteker at 9:58 AM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


George H W Bush won in spite of picking Quayle as VP. Remember?

Bush won 40 states and 400+ electoral votes. I don't think it was quite possible for him to win even more had he picked anyone else.
posted by gyc at 9:59 AM on August 29, 2008


Funny that Mickey C picked a running-mate with a name no one can pronounce. Pah-lin? Pay-lin?
posted by ijoshua at 10:00 AM on August 29, 2008


betraying her fellow women on the issues that count.

Which issues? Which women? Not all women believe the same thing. No political party or ideaology has a lock on "women's issues."
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 10:01 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Then, at the convention, when she more than any other losing candidate in history comes out and supports Obama and tells her voters to get out there and support Obama through a really moving speech, pick it apart and say that she didn't do enough, she wasn't really sincere, she should have talked more about why he is qualified to be president.

To be fair, I don't think it was Obama's supporters doing that so much as the media. Which is not the same thing. It's a manufactured controversy; every Obama supporter I know (i.e., just about everyone in my life who isn't an AARP member) would agree that Clinton's speech and endorsement was gracious and effective.
posted by the_bone at 10:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


You know what's really pissing me off about this pick? The sentiment among the smug conservative pundits that McCain "broke the glass ceiling" with this selection. Bull. Shit. The fact that they cannot see the enormous logical fallacy of that statement is just staggering. The proverbial glass ceiling will be broken by a strong woman who does so of her own merit, not because the condescending establishment saw fit to cut a hole in it big enough only for her -- and did so only because it served their own cynical, fuck-the-95%-of-you agenda.
posted by shiu mai baby at 10:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [86 favorites]


I knew the GOP was the party of evil geniuses, but damn, bravo, they just hoisted the DNC on its own petard by choosing a rabidly pro-life (keep the party faithful happy) woman (oh hai center-right voters HRC was attracting) who started her political career around the same time as Obama (experience!). If they call out the sexist attacks on her that will certainly be made by the same fauxgressives who attacked Clinton while Obama, Dean etc said nothing, omfg, supermega evil genius.
posted by mandymanwasregistered at 10:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Picking Biden let the democrats counter the GOP's claims that Obama lacked experience and foreign policy chops. Clearly the GOP wanted to do something similar with their VP pick, getting someone who could similarly dull an enemy attack and shore up weaknesses.

Problem is, even if the age thing has always been on the table, the Obama campaign has steered clear of it. As far as I know, there aren't Obama ads saying "McCain would be a great president... if he was younger." Even if it is implicit, it was never stated openly.

All this really does is to make McCain look desperate and pandering, and has the added effect of robbing McCain of his second big attack against Obama's lack of experience and his youth.
posted by Uppity Pigeon #2 at 10:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Just after Palin's speech a Fox News commentator read the Democratic response, which was basically that it was unseemly to have a person who has only been governor for two years and the mayor of a town of 8,000 a "heartbeat away from the presidency".

Immediately followed by:

ALERT:
OBAMA CAMPAIGN DISSES PALIN FOR SMALL-TOWN ORIGINS

Seriously.


The release I saw from Bill Burton only mentions that she was a former small town mayor and doesn't mention the fact that she's Governor. To me, that was very insulting and definitely a try at playing the LOL she's hot so she must be stupid card.
posted by gyc at 10:07 AM on August 29, 2008


I feel that Palin's total lack of experience does not take the experience debate off the table.

I think it puts Obama in an awkward position. If he attacks Palin for being inexperienced, he validates the Republican claim that experience is important.

The natural Republican response would be that if experience is that important, then surely it is more important that the person who will actually be President is the experienced one.
posted by vorpal bunny at 10:09 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I heard they are sending Palin to Russia to sort out this war!

Fox News TV Host: Palin knows about foreign policy because Alaska is ‘right next door to Russia’
posted by ericb at 10:10 AM on August 29, 2008


Several have said this removes McCain's 'experience' talking point. I don't see it. McCain's already got experience. n + 0 is still n.

Regarding the 'doesn't know what a VP does' meme, I think that may be a misreading of her statement from a few weeks ago:

....I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”

It sounds like she's saying to McCain and the Republican Party,"if you want me, you better give me a real job (oh, and there better be something in it for Alaska too)."

She only wants to run if she's going to do more than attend the funerals of lesser heads of state.
posted by zippy at 10:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


anastasiav would you prefer if she were against paid leave and took a 90 day break herself? Be a sport and at least praise her for walking the talk - that is, if she IS against paid leaves, which I believe you're just speculating and it's all bullshit. Just another opportunity to put Obama in a good light by comparison.

So, now we have to praise politicians for actually doing what they expect their constituents to do? I do think it's weird to extrapolate from a female politician's behavior what she represents, because no woman governor in her right mind is going to take three months off, no matter what her position is. But acting all surprised that people would wonder about it is silly. Until we learn more about Palin, everyone is going to be speculating. That's a large part of why this announcement was made today: to take attention away from Obama.

Politics is all about framing your opponents' in such a way that it puts you in a good light by comparison.
posted by oneirodynia at 10:10 AM on August 29, 2008


The beauty queen jokes would be sexist, if it were just a way for people to make fun of her looks. But she actually was a beauty queen. Maybe it's not the most incisive critique of her qualifications, but the fact that she competed to be "Miss Congeniality" tells you something about her. As I recall, lots of women have issues with beauty contests and the contestants who tape and vaseline themselves to win them.
posted by PlusDistance at 10:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


The choice strikes me as a tad "Can Hamsters Fly Planes?"-esque.
posted by Metroid Baby at 10:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


When John McCain is ailin'
He brings in Sarah Palin.
When the polls are trailin'
He puts his hopes in Palin.
When the rhetoric's failin'
There's always Sarah Palin.
If liberalism's prevailin'
Then trust in Sarah Palin!

When the election was over, McCain was asked why
And he sheepishly grinned and said with a sigh:
"There once thing I wanted from Sarah Palin:
I needed someone who could explain emailin'."
posted by Astro Zombie at 10:11 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


An awful lot of you seem to be assuming that women voters are shallow idiots, and that PUMAs are more than an invention of Fox News.

Jesus Christ, yes, for the thousandth time: PUMA is a Republican operation. Its chairman voted for McCain in 2000 and contributed $500 bucks out of her own pocket to his campaign.

STOP TALKING ABOUT PUMA, FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST.
posted by middleclasstool at 10:11 AM on August 29, 2008 [11 favorites]


[I]t is clear to me that Metafilter is so partisan that it can't really view election issues clearly or with any distance. This was a really smart move for McCain, as long as she doesn't have something in her past that will come back to bite him. This next week and the Republican convention might be tough for Democrats.[

Do you really think so? Really? If it's tough on the Dems it'll be because they will be trying not to have coronaries from laughing themselves sick and rolling around on the floor watching the Goobers On Parade trying to justify Palin's choice.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 10:12 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


But is the Christian right really going to accept a mother with a 5-month-old infant going on the campaign trail?

If the guy from the Christian right who has an office across from mine is any indication, the answer is yes. Before the Palin pick he was ready to sit out this election. What's important here is her pro-life, creationist position. As much as I hate to generalize, this is the one overriding factor for most folks I know who have this political bent.

The Hillary supporters are going to be insulted that McCain made such a bad choice just to pander to women. I'm glad that Obama didn't pick Hillary as his VP, but it would have been killer diller to watch Hillary smash Palin in such a one sided debate.

I can almost guarantee that if the Democratic ticket was Obama/Hillary, Palin would not have been McCain's veep choice, exactly for the reason you cite.

As it stands, the VP debates will be interesting to watch. Though Biden's a seasoned politician, when he strays from prepared speech, he can really stick his foot in his mouth.

It appears to me that Obama's choice of Biden is based on the assumption that Biden would actually make a good vice president. The cynic in me sees McCain's pick not as somebody who will help him govern, rather the opportunity to pick up a few votes.
posted by SteveInMaine at 10:13 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Barack: "Wait, McCain's VP pick is married to an Eskimo, champion snowmobile racer??"

*divorces Michelle, marries native-Hawaiian surfing champion.*

"Take *that,* Johnny!"
posted by ericbop at 10:15 AM on August 29, 2008


The questions about the VP debate will be interesting. The previous thinking was that you let Biden be Biden. Unleash the hounds, so to speak.

Now, not so much. Biden is going to have to play it straight, or else he looks like an asshole. I think he can do it, and do it well, but it certainly changes the equation.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 10:16 AM on August 29, 2008


She graduated with a degree in journalism. *blink* I am entirely confused as to how this is the best of the best to be the first person in the presidential line of succession.

I don't care what her beliefs are, this is astounding.

It's the only thing XQUZYPHYR didn't mention, otherwise I am in agreement with that post.
posted by fluffycreature at 10:16 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Obama's speech last night was incredibly moving. America, such an amazing, wonderful place, would do well to elect Obama. He is the dream realized.

I just hope he doesn't suffer too much from stigmata or halo-chafing.
posted by mattholomew at 10:17 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Has Geraldine Ferraro spoken up about this? If there's anyone to compare Palin to, it would be her. Ferraro had a law degree and three terms in the House when she was on the ticket, and was perceived to be inexperienced.

But that was way back before the Culture War
posted by jsavimbi at 10:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


She might be inexperienced in absolute terms, but look at the bigger picture, people. Obama is claiming 12 years of experience out of 4.5 billion years of Earth, but Palin's got two years out of a mere 6,000 — she totally wins on the percentages.
posted by enn at 10:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [150 favorites]


So the woman VP is bad due to her lack of experience. Let's not forget that Obama's 'experience' led him to vote FOR retroactive immunity for the telecoms that helped Bush illegally spy on us all. But I guess we're all supposed to agree that one's quantity of experience is more important than its quality.
posted by jsonic at 10:24 AM on August 29, 2008


Oh, and she's an attractive woman. OMG METAFILTER RAAAAAAAAAGE!!!

I thought the Republicans were supposed to be the male chauvinists.


You know, I'm really naive in thinking that at some point in my life people will actually get it through their heads that feminism is as much about equally judging women's faults as it is about judging their attributes.

Whining that everyone here is ragging on Palin for her looks means you deliberately haven't read this thread, are pretending to be stupid, or merely think everyone else on this thread is stupid enough to believe what you said. None of those three options are highly appealing.

Palin's unfit to be vice-president. Biden is a better politician, a smarter person, and a more qualified candidate than her by an exponential factor. And if you think any of that is "chauvinist," then I really just give up on you.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [48 favorites]


Despite the risks, one major McCain reason for picking Palin is becoming increasingly obvious: highest probability of self-inflicted Democratic wounds through various overenthusiastic and overreaching attacks. She's a ready-made target for the loose cannons. Hey there Democrats: a Palin pick is supposed designed purely to help McCain, and it's almost impossible for it to hurt Obama. In other words, it shores up his base but has virtually no effect on Obama's base -- PUMAs are minuscule in number, have never intended to vote to Obama under any circumstances to begin with, and they're not concentrated in any particular battleground state. Democratic women are strongly and overwhelmingly pro-choice, and for the most part independent women are as well. In short, Palin is supposed to generate more enthusiasm/turnout among Republicans (by addressing certain McCain weaknesses among his base -- for instance, her stanch creationist stance comes into play here), and Palin will not win crossover votes from Obama/Biden unless you people give voters a reason to. Don't screw it up with ill-conceived rhetoric like some are doing in this thread and elsewhere on various blogs, because that's exactly what McCain is hoping for, too. Especially from Biden in the VP debates, where I expect the McCain campaign to have a few particularly goading lines prepared for him. (HAI BIDEN, 4 PWNAGE STAY ON POLICY PLZ, KTHXBYE.)

As long as Democrats stay tactful, disciplined, and on-message, all the reasons why Palin was discounted as a serious veep possibility not so long ago will manifest themselves clearly during the course of the campaign. Very few people seriously expected McCain to pick Palin for many reasons, and those reasons will be played out in due time as long as Democrats don't trip over themselves trying too hard to push things along. Of course, asking Democrats not to screw up a campaign is like asking a bear not to shit in the woods. It might be even asking too much of the fabled Obama team to keep their party on-message.
posted by DaShiv at 10:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [31 favorites]


Uh-oh!

McCain's pick of Palin is backfiring with the Hillary dead-enders!
posted by orthogonality at 10:25 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


McCain's pick shows all the judgment and wisdom of George W. Bush picking Harriet Myers as the best possible candidate for the Supreme Court.
posted by kirkaracha at 10:27 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


I guess Susan Collins, Christie Todd Whitman, Oympia Snowe, and Elizabeth Dole were busy.

Or not batshit anti-abortion enough.
posted by jonp72 at 10:28 AM on August 29, 2008


Who cares if she's a woman? She's anti-choice, corrupt and in Big Oil's pocket. Picking her doesn't make John McCain a maverick. It makes him a Republican.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:29 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


I hope Palin campaigns wearing a sash that says "For disgruntled Hillary fans".
posted by Cranberry at 10:29 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Americans were giddy with scorn when the media exposed Chinese Olympic officials had substituted a "pretty child" for the "ugly one" in the opening ceremonies ...

McCain has copied the strategy.

He has chosen an unqualified beauty queen over a long list of much more qualified and respected Republican women - i.e., Kathleen Sibelius Janet Napolitano Elizabeth Dole ...

I am not a Republican, and so should probably be happy about this horrific decision. However, I am a feminist. I find this act emblematic of people who view women as no more than decorative objects.

This kind of diminuation of women is such an insult. Don't EVEN compare this woman to Hillary!
posted by Surfurrus at 10:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


The couple-of-million or so PUMAs, the Clintonites who won't vote for Obama. (Not to be confused with cougars, btw).

There's a high degree of intersection.
posted by rokusan at 10:32 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


My first reaction was "cynical", followed immediately by "coldly calculating" which looped back to "cynical" again.

I do think it'll gain more votes than it loses, unless she falls very flat on her face in the next couple of months.
posted by rokusan at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008


Uh-oh!

McCain's pick of Palin is backfiring with the Hillary dead-enders!


Ha! Serves them right. There are a lot of unsavory adjectives you could apply to the Hillary dead-enders, but "Easily placated" sure is not one of them.
posted by Uppity Pigeon #2 at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Gonna second Kwine's comment above, because it's the best attack line for the Democrats, and so far the Obama camp has been pretty damned good about following the right attack line. Palin's a non-entity. Biden is the anti-McCain attack dog, and as long as he stays on that scent he'll do fine. He doesn't have to attack Palin because there's just nothing there. Have Biden hammer against McCain in the debates, and he wins.
posted by GhostintheMachine at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Biden is a better politician, a smarter person, and a more qualified candidate than her by an exponential factor.

Um, what? "Better Politician"?? What does that even mean? And how do you know if he's smarter or not?
posted by mattholomew at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008


This certainly puts the abortion issue back in play, which should boil away the mushy middle and leave us the starkly split electorate we've had in recent past.

onlyconnect: You know, male democrats who don't get the whole Hillary Clinton thing have been pissing off female democrats who do during the entire primary season.

Lead Hillary off with all the tough debate questions and send a few easy ones to Obama, and then if the Hillary camp complains call them whining complainers.


The debates were moderated by male Democrats?

Market a bunch of sexist products that make fun of Hillary (where no one would dare do the same thing to Obama), and have a bunch of media talking heads say awful sexist things to her, and then say her camp is a bunch of whiners and complainers when they speak up about it.

Which male democrats marketed these products? Which media talking heads were male Democrats?

Once Obama has effectively won the primary, make it clear that he is not going to seriously consider her for VP, and don't let us know why, and pick some stuffy old white guy instead. Okay, fine.

Which male Democrats said this? And let me just say, as Hillary fan (but Obama voter), I would much, MUCH rather have her kicking ass in the Senate than withering away as VP. If you wanted Hillary as VP for either the historical hit points or because you felt she deserved it, I think you should re-evaluate your political priorities. VP is for losers.

Then, at the convention, when she more than any other losing candidate in history comes out and supports Obama and tells her voters to get out there and support Obama through a really moving speech, pick it apart and say that she didn't do enough, she wasn't really sincere, she should have talked more about why he is qualified to be president.

Who the frak are you talking about? Male Democrats or the media?

And now, when McCain surprises a large portion of americans who thought he was going to pick some old rich white dude as his VP but instead picks a "youngish" (mid-forties) woman (again, supposedly the most popular governor in America and known as a serious reformer), bust out jokes about how she was a beauty queen and how dumb she must be and how ridiculously political this move is. And how dumb it is to pick your VP just to go after the female vote.

It's not "dumb", in fact it's politically expedient. But I for one am sick of political expediency. Nor is she dumb, and I don't know that anyone is claiming she is. But governor --> VP in two years does not inspire confidence that the pick was made for her political savvy.

It seems to me like a bunch of male democrats have been underestimating the importance of the female vote for a pretty serious stretch of time here.

You appear to claiming that the only way male Democrats could properly estimate the importance of the female vote would be to give them a female to vote for. Seems to me you're underestimating the intelligence of the average female voter.
posted by schoolgirl report at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [26 favorites]


He has chosen an unqualified beauty queen over a long list of much more qualified and respected Republican women - i.e., Kathleen Sibelius Janet Napolitano Elizabeth Dole ...

Well, one out of three ain't bad.
posted by EarBucket at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008


She's a creationist.

"In an interview Thursday, Palin said she meant only to say that discussion of alternative views should be allowed to arise in Alaska classrooms: "I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."

She added that, if elected, she would push the state Board of Education to add such creation-based alternatives to the state's required curriculum."


So, she believes (and wishes to enforce teaching) that the Earth was "created" 1000 years after the Sumerians invented glue.
posted by plexi at 10:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


I had to look up PUMA. Thank you for the education.
posted by malaprohibita at 10:34 AM on August 29, 2008


First black president or first female vice president? That's awesome.

Fixed that for you. McCain is eleventy-six years old, so whoever his VP is is very very likely to become President, too.

And pretty or not, that sort of scares me, though I do like that we'll get one or the other, assuming she isn't impeached or resigns first.
posted by rokusan at 10:34 AM on August 29, 2008


When I opened my browser this morning and went to Yahoo to check my e-mail, this was the lead story. And I know people kid about this, and jokingly make this claim, but in this instance I literally did do a spit take with my Nescafé.

This so blatantly reaks of desperation as to be humorous.

Also, what XQUZYPHYR said.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:34 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


SteveInMaine: As it stands, the VP debates will be interesting to watch. Though Biden's a seasoned politician, when he strays from prepared speech, he can really stick his foot in his mouth.

As it stands, the Presidential debates will be interesting to watch. Though McCain's a seasoned politician, when he strays from prepared speech, he can really stick his foot in his mouth.
posted by mkultra at 10:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin's unfit to be vice-president.

HAHA. You just found out about this lady this morning. Yet you're already absolutely sure she can't be VP just because she has slightly less experience than Obama. Talk about jumping to conclusions, and then trying to rationalize them afterwards.
posted by jsonic at 10:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Surfurrus writes "He has chosen an unqualified beauty queen over a long list of much more qualified and respected Republican women - i.e., Kathleen Sibelius Janet Napolitano Elizabeth Dole ..."

Are you trying to be funny here? Sibelius and Napolitano are both Democrats. (And Liddy Dole started out working for Kennedy-Johnson '60, and then worked in LBJ's Whitehouse.)
posted by orthogonality at 10:36 AM on August 29, 2008


Has Geraldine Ferraro spoken up about this?

Kind of.
posted by ericbop at 10:37 AM on August 29, 2008


HAHA. You just found out about this lady this morning.

Umm... no, no I didn't. Some of us are actually interested in politics here.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:38 AM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


Jeanne: And there's no way she's prepard to take over if McCain dies.

Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.
posted by Jahaza at 10:39 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


He has chosen an unqualified beauty queen over a long list of much more qualified and respected Republican women - i.e., Kathleen Sibelius Janet Napolitano Elizabeth Dole ...

Sebelius and Napolitano are Democrats.
posted by arianell at 10:39 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Though McCain's a seasoned politician, when he strays from prepared speech, he can really stick his foot in his mouth.

Yeah, at least Biden doesn't do that.
posted by mattholomew at 10:39 AM on August 29, 2008


You know, I'm really naive in thinking that at some point in my life people will actually get it through their heads that feminism is as much about equally judging women's faults as it is about judging their attributes.

I felt the same way when I had to defend my choice of voting for Obama over Clinton. Because I am a woman and a feminist, I was "supposed" to vote for Clinton. It took a lot to explain that being a feminist meant placing women on equal footing with men and not just voting for a woman just because she's a woman.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 10:40 AM on August 29, 2008 [17 favorites]


And if you think any of that is "chauvinist," then I really just give up on you.

Yeah, lets just ignore all the 'beauty queen' comments that are being attached quite liberally to most criticisms of this lady. I'm sure that has nothing to do with dismissing her based on her gender.
posted by jsonic at 10:40 AM on August 29, 2008


(My third reaction was: That old horndog McCain must have misunderstood the term "running mate".)
posted by rokusan at 10:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Has Geraldine Ferraro spoken up about this?

Geraldine will love Palin. 'Cause she's white.
posted by EarBucket at 10:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


She graduated with a degree in journalism.

Holy shit. I'M GONNA BE PRESIDENT! This is gonna fucking rock!
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 10:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Biden is in a catch-22, he will be eviscerated in the debate. I won't argue my opinion, but I'll be happy to go down in mefi history as the guy who thought Joe would lose the debate...badly.
I'm pissed that Obama chose an old white beltway failed hothead as veep. Poor decision making. Play it safe move by team Obama. Methinks Palin intimidates some people here already.
NOT a McCain man at all.
posted by dawson at 10:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


ColdChef: "Sarah and Todd Palin have five children: boys Track, 19, and Trig, 4 months, and daughters Bristol, 17, Willow, 13, and Piper, 7.

Dear GOD! Vice Presidents don't get to NAME anything, do they?!
"

Operation Ashley
Operation Britney
Operation Madison
etc.....

Leno just creamed his slacks.
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 10:42 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.

By that measure, she has more than McCain as well.
posted by Slothrup at 10:42 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


jsonic, the beauty queen comments are coming from the fact that we're talking about a woman who was, literally, a beauty queen. Why is this an issue for you?
posted by shiu mai baby at 10:43 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


I wish McCain had chosen Hillary. Now that would have made for an interesting election.
posted by you just lost the game at 10:43 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Yeah, lets just ignore all the 'beauty queen' comments that are being attached quite liberally to most criticisms of this lady. I'm sure that has nothing to do with dismissing her based on her gender.

I think the non-sexist point there, whether on the mark or not, is that that's the BEST thing one can find to say about her. It's no more sexist than calling GWB a college cheerleader.
posted by rokusan at 10:45 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Whatever may be her faults, McCain certainly succeeded in pushing last night's historic performance off the front page.
posted by DU at 10:45 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Though McCain's a seasoned politician, when he strays from prepared speech, he can really stick his foot in his mouth.

Yeah, at least Biden doesn't do that.
Heck, Biden can't give a prepared speech.
posted by Jahaza at 10:45 AM on August 29, 2008


So, she believes (and wishes to enforce teaching) that the Earth was "created" 1000 years after the Sumerians invented glue.

that's because the sumerians got sick of sticking to each other in space - god had to do something ...
posted by pyramid termite at 10:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


I wish McCain had chosen Hillary. Now that would have made for an interesting election.
posted by mattholomew at 10:46 AM on August 29, 2008


McCain's biggest problem was that social conservatives don't like him and were contemplating staying home on election day. Social conservatives are euphoric over this pick and will now turn out in droves.
posted by spudsilo at 10:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I wish McCain had chosen Hillary. Now that would have made for an interesting election.

Yikes, sorry about the double post - but I thought the same thing, that would be world-class entertainment.
posted by mattholomew at 10:47 AM on August 29, 2008


I'm going to have an honest question for my Republican friends that I know love this country: what if McCain dies?

I'd much rather have Palin as my President than Obama.

jsonic, the beauty queen comments are coming from the fact that we're talking about a woman who was, literally, a beauty queen. Why is this an issue for you?

Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep.
posted by gyc at 10:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


mattholomew: "Biden is a better politician, a smarter person, and a more qualified candidate than her by an exponential factor.

Um, what? "Better Politician"?? What does that even mean? And how do you know if he's smarter or not?
"

Jesus, don't make us do all your work, eh?
posted by KevinSkomsvold at 10:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


everyone's saying sarah palin is a conservative, but really, she's a feminist....for life.
posted by snofoam at 10:48 AM on August 29, 2008


My .02 is she is in for a fall, being set up as it were, and Lieberman is chosen (or Romney). That way McCain can say he tried, offered a woman for VP, but when she couldn't pass muster he went with the more expeirenced and proven (Fill in the blank).
posted by Gungho at 10:48 AM on August 29, 2008


She seems like more of a Mussolini than a Thatcher to me.
posted by Artw at 10:49 AM on August 29, 2008


Of course she is! Because denying women control over their own bodies is oh so feminist.
posted by agregoli at 10:49 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I wouldn't be surprised to find out that her opponents two years ago were saying Palin didn't have the experience to be governor.
posted by Daddy-O at 10:49 AM on August 29, 2008


The announcement was made when McCain and another masked figure rode up to the assembled press on motorcycles. McCain, wearing his visor up, got off his bike and walked forward; the other figure, clothed all in black leather, with a black visor, stayed still. After some preamble, McCain said: "and now, the next Vice President of the United States!" All eyes turned to the masked rider, who then removed the helmet and *gasp* revealed herself to be a woman, with long hair spilling down about her shoulders.

Or at least, that's how it should have been.
posted by roombythelake at 10:50 AM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]



Are you trying to be funny here?


Nope, just didn't know any Republican women candidates offhand ... used a blog's list
(http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/02/john_mccains_top_22_potential.php).

Perhaps I should have left the list blank? Actually, maybe I should have put the question out:

-- DOES the Republican party have any 'respected, qualified' candidates who DON'T look like beauty contestants???

I still feel this is the case of a "pretty girl" substituted for an "ugly" one.

This Palin choice is no "advancement for women". It is just one more insult.
posted by Surfurrus at 10:50 AM on August 29, 2008


First sighting of 'I know Hillary Clinton, and...' meme...

More to come.
posted by rokusan at 10:52 AM on August 29, 2008


"Senator McCain, where is your VP candidate from?"

"Alaska"

"No, I'm asking YOU the question, Senator."

"Juneau."

"No, I DON'T know—that's why I'm asking!"

"Anchorage."

"Do you really need encouragement just to answer the question?"

Nome?

No sir, we do not. That's why we're asking you.

"Fairbanks."

"Senator McCain, there will be time to discuss your financial policies later. I'm asking about your VP selection."

"What was the question again?"

[fuming] "Listen. Let me put it to you this way: the people who come from this place—they must call themselves something. What's the word they use to refer to themselves?"

"Inuit."

"Good. I suppose you wouldn't mind sharing it with me, then?"

"Eskimo."

"I'm not interviewing Moe—I'm asking you!"

"So, Senator, is it true you picked Gov. Palin as a pandering move to women voters?"

"Denali."

"You can't deny that she's your running mate."

"Wasilla"
posted by goethean at 10:52 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


But governor --> VP in two years does not inspire confidence that the pick was made for her political savvy.


Call me cynical but in my book "political savvy" = retread D.C. hack (Joe Biden anyone?). Do we really need yet another high elected official with decades of experience kowtowing to their corporate paymasters?
posted by MikeMc at 10:52 AM on August 29, 2008


Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep.

No, the deal is that we have a woman who's been governor of of a state (population of which is smaller than Obama's congressional district) for a mere 18 months, and before that was a mayor of a town smaller than the one where Elvis was born. We've got that and the beauty queen thing to go on. And not a whole hell of a lot else. Fair game.
posted by shiu mai baby at 10:52 AM on August 29, 2008


wow. when did fark get this nice blue background?
posted by dawson at 10:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


This pick makes fools and hypocrites of all the Republicans who have been saying that Obama doesn't have enough experience and that that's why they won't vote for him.
posted by goethean at 10:53 AM on August 29, 2008


Don't make us do all your work, eh?

Sorry, you might have to do a bit more -- you've shown that Biden is mostly a democrat and Palin is mostly a Republican although I haven't seen anything that indicates that one is a 'better politician' or 'smarter' than the other. Biden's collossal verbal gaffe against Obama certainly doesn't help either case.
posted by mattholomew at 10:54 AM on August 29, 2008


the beauty queen comments are coming from the fact that we're talking about a woman who was, literally, a beauty queen. Why is this an issue for you?

It's always brought up derisively. It's the equivalent of saying she's an airhead because she's pretty. Otherwise why even bring it up? The entire relevance is the idea that "we all know" beauty queens shouldn't be taken seriously.

And admit it: If it were the republicans doing this, all of you would be raging hard.
posted by jsonic at 10:54 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


The Daily Show is going to use "Hot for Teacher" for any segments on her. They must.
posted by RakDaddy at 10:54 AM on August 29, 2008


I'd much rather have Palin as my President than Obama.

Okay, gyc, I'll bite -- why?
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 10:56 AM on August 29, 2008


jsonic, so you consider beauty pageants worthy of some kind of respect? I don't see anything of substance or honorable about being in one.
posted by agregoli at 10:56 AM on August 29, 2008


wow. when did fark get this nice blue background?

It's part of the transition to full on /b/. You'll get over it.
posted by MikeMc at 10:58 AM on August 29, 2008


Yeah, lets just ignore all the 'beauty queen' comments that are being attached quite liberally to most criticisms of this lady. I'm sure that has nothing to do with dismissing her based on her gender.

Does everything need a disclaimer around here?

At some point, this woman decided to compete in a beauty contest. She seems to be proud of her performance in it. Therefore, this decision is fair game for criticism, especially with regard to what this could mean for jilted Hillary voters.

Lots of feminists consider beauty contests A Bad Thing™. I personally question someone's judgment who participates in one. This is clearly a red flag if we're operating under the hypothesis that this VP pick is pandering to Hillary supporters.
posted by butterstick at 11:00 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


bukharin, I have the same concern. I think the point Biden has to drive home is that Ahmedinajad/Medvedev/Putin/etc. are not going to pull punches when seated across the nuclear non-proliferation negotiating table from a possible President Palin (*shudder*), so she had better be able to conduct herself in a lousy VP debate.
posted by fingers_of_fire at 11:01 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


so you consider beauty pageants worthy of some kind of respect? I don't see anything of substance or honorable about being in one.

Nobody is making that argument. The beauty pageant comments are an attempt to discredit her as an airheaded woman. The fact that left-leaning commentors feel justified in doing this just adds to the hypocrisy.
posted by jsonic at 11:02 AM on August 29, 2008


I haven't seen anything that indicates that one is a 'better politician' or 'smarter' than the other.

Palin believes the Earth is 4,000 years old. What the hell more do you need?
posted by rokusan at 11:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [24 favorites]


Why is this an issue for you?

It is an issue for jsonic because jsonic likes to find things to chide metafilter for. If it hadn't been that, he'd have been offended by something else, possibly something only he could see.

It's the equivalent of saying she's an airhead because she's pretty.

For whatever it's worth to others who are actually interested in a conversation instead of the automatic gainsay of whatever "lefty" posture jsonic projects onto metafilter, it's not.

It's the equivalent of saying that she's an airhead because she participates in vapid, airheaded activities. Having voluntarily competed in beauty pageants should be as embarrassing as appearing on the Gong Show to any adult who wants to be taken seriously.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 11:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


mattholomew: Biden's collossal verbal gaffe

You've got an interesting interpretation of "collossal". "Makaka" was a collossal gaffe. All those folks saying gross and insulting things when they (incorrectly) think the mic is off are collossal gaffes.

Biden could have chosen his words better, but that was largely MSM manufactured outrage.
posted by mkultra at 11:02 AM on August 29, 2008


rokusan writes "First sighting of 'I know Hillary Clinton, and...' meme..."

You know, it's funny. Here is where I first saw the Plin news,and it didn't even occur to me to check the mainstream media's reaction.

I looked here, and on reddit and fark and dailykos, and on a few other blogs.

In fact, I never read the Washington Post's site anymore, because it requires a log-in. I don't read CNN or Reuters or the AP much, because they require javascript to work correctly.

And really, I'm more interested in blog or aggregator sites, because they give an idea of how Americans are reacting to the news. Weird, but except as sources for aggregators too link to, I don't have a use for the MSM; instead on rely on bloggers to filter my news.
posted by orthogonality at 11:02 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I think there have been some sexist comments in this thread, but I don't think bringing up the nominee for Vice President's days in a beauty pageant is sexist. Unless we want to assume that something like that is intrinsic to being a woman, which is more insulting that any mention of the contest - I'm a woman, I think beauty pageants are stupid and demeaning and I think poorly of women who participate in them. I don't want women involved in them as my political leaders and I don't want them representing me unless they have a cornucopia of experience that overrides that one negative one. Which Palin really doesn't.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 11:03 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


It's the equivalent of saying she's an airhead because she's pretty.

No.

It's a sad, funny, pathetic accomplishment on her resume, akin to "Sang and Danced in Local Theatre Production of Miss Saigon."

It would be so whether she was pretty or not.
posted by rokusan at 11:04 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Call me cynical but in my book "political savvy" = retread D.C. hack (Joe Biden anyone?). Do we really need yet another high elected official with decades of experience kowtowing to their corporate paymasters?

Well shoot, high government experience has to count for something, doesn't it? Otherwise we might as well elect as President any old smartypants who made a meteoric rise from county clerk to head of the city council in two years. We want our politicians to get things done, yes? For better or for worse, getting things done doesn't mean just wanting to get them done, it means knowing how to get them done.
posted by schoolgirl report at 11:04 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Video of her speech today
posted by Perplexity at 11:04 AM on August 29, 2008


You know, it's funny. Here is where I first saw the Plin news,and it didn't even occur to me to check the mainstream media's reaction.

I just Googled "Hillary +Palin" to find reactions. I'm now reading all the right wing sites in my bookmarks. It's... mixed.
posted by rokusan at 11:05 AM on August 29, 2008


Something I can't figure out from her bio: has she ever had a job aside from sports reporter and commercial fisherman? (And yes, I mean job outside of the home.)
posted by miss tea at 11:05 AM on August 29, 2008


Beauty pageants are all about judging a woman on how she looks. Period. You can burnish it all you like by calling it a "scholarship competition," have the participants sing opera and twirl batons and proclaim their desire for world peace, but there's no getting around that winners are selected using the most shallow and inconsequential of standards -- ones that completely undercut every effort for equality that women have tried to make. In other words, it's the ultimate endorsement of the belief that women are pretty objects that are placed on god's green earth for the oggling.

Beauty pageant participants are not automatically stupid, and no one here is saying that. But someone who values them enough to be a competitor indicates an obsession and an elevation of principles that I really wouldn't want in a politician, much less someone who has the very real potential to be president.
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [22 favorites]


Biden could have chosen his words better, but that was largely MSM manufactured outrage.

Right. Well, as long as it's convenient to think so, good luck with that.
posted by mattholomew at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008


It's the equivalent of saying that she's an airhead because she participates in vapid, airheaded activities.

It's still an ad hominem attack for the most part, though. Dick Cheney is a bad vice president because he supports bad policies, not because he has stupid hobbies.
posted by burnmp3s at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008


In thinking more about the bizarreness of this pick and it's shades of Bush's Harriet Miers moment...

I really wonder how the Republican establishment feels about it. Certainly the Wall St. Republicans who have always wanted a Romney-esq pick are probably a little unsettled.

I don't think it will happen, but I wouldn't be greatly surprised if, in a few news cycles, Palin declines or changes her mind in the same manner that Miers was quietly swept under the rug. Stranger things have happened...
posted by wfrgms at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Okay, gyc, I'll bite -- why?

Because I oppose Obama's policies and, from my research of her political views, support hers. I think working with McCain, who has a wealth of experience to share, she will be ready to lead. She's also shown that she's willing to call out corruption in her own political party, while I haven't seen anything like that from Obama, even though he comes from one of the most corrupt political environment in the country.

It's nothing personal against Obama, I just don't agree with much of his policies and he hasn't shown much tendency to call out his own party when necessary, as opposed to McCain and now Palin.
posted by gyc at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


The beauty pageant comments are an attempt to discredit her as an airheaded woman.

It's not that beauty queens are stupid. I think it has more like, beauty queens are to feminism what Stepin Feticht is to civil rights. They place a woman's looks above every other aspect of her, demeaning and objectifying women everywhere.
posted by Bookhouse at 11:06 AM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


Oh please, jsonic. If you're not arguing that it's worthy of respect, than it's somehow off-limits to criticize a possible VP picks choices? *I* don't respect beauty pageants, and added to her record and positions, it's only one more thing that proves she's as non-feminist as they come. I find it absolutely fair game to criticize someone's non-feminism, as that's important to me. It has nothing to do with calling her an airhead - it's questioning her beliefs about women.
posted by agregoli at 11:07 AM on August 29, 2008


McCain couldn't chose Hillary for the same reason Obama couldn't : they want to stay alive.
posted by jeffburdges at 11:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Obama doesn't kiss Biden on the cheek like that.
posted by XMLicious at 11:07 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin believes the Earth is 4,000 years old. What the hell more do you need?

If I'm not mistaken McCain, Obama and Biden all profess to believe in the Zombie Carpenter From Galilee so what does that say about them?
posted by MikeMc at 11:08 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Agreed. But I don't know why everyone's so quick to hate on or even be surprised by the "visceral" women; look at Obama's 90+ to 1 margin among black voters. Is the tribal nature of our politics so surprising to us that we can't move past it?

The idea that women were for Hillary just because she's a woman, or Blacks are for Obama just because he's black misses the point by a wide margin.

Blacks are so overwhelmingly for Obama because on a visceral level, his Blackness isn't the first thing they see, it's his obvious gifts. They well up with pride and emotion for Obama not because he's "one of us" because he's so damn good.

Women are so overwhelmingly for Clinton because on a visceral level, Her gender isn't the first thing they see, it's her obvious gifts. They well up with pride and emotion for Clinton not because she's "one of us", but because she's so damn good.

A lot of Black folks and Women have been seeing for the past 18 months what a lot of people just saw this week.

If McCain picked a Woman as a political ploy, then he truly doesn't get it. I mean, there's not a lot of women OR Black people exactly welling up with pride about Condoleeza Rice.

I think this might have been the best thing McCain could hae done, even if he did it for cynical, wrong headed reasons. If her being an Less experienced woman levels the playing field for him, then it levels the playing field for the Dems as well. If "experience", and "history" are off the table, that's just more room to talk about the bigger issues.

If McCain made this choice for cynical reasons, or because he really, really deep down in his heart believes Obama is an empty suit coasting in on a cult of personality, then he's in big trouble. Because from the looks of the past week, he has a bigger fight on his hands than he realizes.
posted by billyfleetwood at 11:08 AM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


In thinking more about the bizarreness of this pick and it's shades of Bush's Harriet Miers moment...

I disagree. Social conservatives hated Miers because they didn't trust her to be a reliably conservative Justice. Meanwhile, most social conservatives so far seem to love Palin.
posted by gyc at 11:09 AM on August 29, 2008


Everyone cites a lack of experience, but that hasn't stopped Obama or Hillary.
posted by VicNebulous at 11:09 AM on August 29, 2008


I want to know why the hell McCain was fiddling with his wedding ring during her speech.
posted by kyleg at 11:10 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Is there a source that shows Palin is a young-Earth creationist (Earth is only 6000 years old), or is she just a creationist (God got things going 4.5B years ago)? The two are pretty different.
posted by olinerd at 11:11 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Her voice isn't that far off from "Will & Grace's" Karen Walker!

Karen Walker for VP?
posted by ericb at 11:11 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Although some folks are calling this a move out of desperation, I don't think that's the case at all. McCain is pretty much running even with Obama, there's no desperation involved here. Hell, even his timing is spot on. You'll have to look deep to find any mention of Obama's speech, every news outlet is so busy reporting on Palin.

McCain's handlers are clearly on top of their game right now.
posted by tommasz at 11:12 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


MikeMc:


Thank you sir or madam, check's in the mail.
posted by mattholomew at 11:12 AM on August 29, 2008


DOES the Republican party have any 'respected, qualified' candidates who DON'T look like beauty contestants???

Sure. Maine's excellent Senator Olympia Snowe.

FYI: I'm a hardcore Dem and Obama supporter. I wish McCain had picked Olympia. She rocks.
posted by anastasiav at 11:12 AM on August 29, 2008


"She's also shown that she's willing to call out corruption in her own political party, while I haven't seen anything like that from Obama, even though he comes from one of the most corrupt political environment in the country."

And so the Coburn–Obama Transparency Act was... what exactly?
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:12 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


I'm going to have an honest question for my Republican friends that I know love this country: what if McCain dies?

"What do you mean?
Bill Clinton was 47 and governor of Arkansas when he became President. Sarah Palin is 44 and governor of Alaska and running for VP, not president. I can't understand why you call her "inexperienced".

Besides, she has given birth to five children. Even though she knew that the last one was going to be disabled. This alone proves that she can make the right choices and I trust that she would also be making the right choices as POTUS. She is strong and principled and she would also have the strength to make the right decisions as president.

How dare you criticize her just because she is from a small town?"

And how dare you diss John McCain, a former POW who lived in a box for five years and had to subsist on a thin stew of vegetables, beans, fish, potatoes, chicken, prawns and four kinds of rice.
posted by sour cream at 11:13 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


Well shoot, high government experience has to count for something, doesn't it?

To be honest with you I'd rather see more candidates drawn from the civil service ranks that elected officials. Doesn't experience gained without begging lobbyists for money count for anything?
posted by MikeMc at 11:13 AM on August 29, 2008


McCain’s VP Choice Is Under Ethics Investigation For Abuse Of Power In Alaska
posted by homunculus at 11:15 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Well, I don't really know exactly what McCain was thinking with this choice. Get some disaffected Hillaryites I guess? But this totally shoots down his "experience" message, because he has picked someone with less experience by far than anyone else on either ticket, and this would be someone one step from being leader of the free world if McCain were elected. She does not inspire confidence in me, at all, from a leadership perspective.

Oh, there's one other benefit for McCain: there's nothing in the media records showing her attacking McCain for anything. For anyone better-known, like his primary opponents, there probably is.

As a Democrat, I'm not displeased at all by his choice. I don't think this selection particularly shores up any McCain weaknesses, but it does detract from the efficacy of his "experience" message. And without that...what else does he have? Not much!
posted by jamstigator at 11:15 AM on August 29, 2008


It's not a contest, it's a scholarship program!
posted by garlic at 11:15 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


gyc: I think working with McCain, who has a wealth of experience to share, she will be ready to lead.

Where does the "ready to lead" part come from? You share her position on policies, so would you be ready to lead if you were working with McCain? Does Palin's 1.5 years as governor tip the scales in her favor over you?

Ultimately, this "ready to lead" issue is crap. You think she's ready to lead because you want her to be. I think Obama is ready to lead because I want him to be. Neither of us has a clue how ready either of them are, because it is not a measurable quality. This is why we should vote on the issues. And it's also why we don't. Because voting based on what you want is easy, while voting based on what is likely is hard.
posted by schoolgirl report at 11:15 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


This is exactly the sort of VP candidate that I had been hoping Obama would pick — a governor from a Western or Southern state, youngish, a sort of rising star but who had carved out some idiosyncratic approaches rather than a party hack.

Instead, Obama chose an older white guy, a senator no less, from a small northeastern state. If that were a recipe for success, we'd be talking about whether or not VP Lieberman was considering a White House run about now. Biden is a nice guy, experienced, and really smart, but he doesn't exactly add a lot of zing to the ticket.

I think that this is a really smart move by McCain. She comes out of some pretty rough-and-tumble state politics (where the senior people are starting to have some real problems running into corruption charges), and is smart and fast on her feet. She's as tied to the energy business as anyone the GOP is likely to pick, but with a blend of western conservationism that permeates both parties out here. She's attractive and lively in a way that plays well against McCain, and he knows it.

So good for him, bad for my hopes of an end to republican presidents for the next four years.
posted by Forktine at 11:16 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


sour cream, again, has it.
posted by Artw at 11:16 AM on August 29, 2008


Schoolgirl report: The debates were moderated by male Democrats? . . . Which male democrats marketed these products? Which media talking heads were male Democrats? You're correct that it was not necessarily male democrats committing the original acts (though many journalists are both male and democrat), but look back at any of the Metafilter threads on the primaries for tons and tons of male democrats calling Hillary's camp whining whiners for calling out the weird debate dynamics and the sexist behavior and full of praise for Obama for downplaying the race card.

Which male Democrats said this? I never heard Obama say he was considering Clinton for vice president, and from the short list that was talked about in the media -- which most often is leaked by the candidate's staff to get opinions about it before the decision was made -- it was clear she wasn't on it.

Who the frak are you talking about? Male Democrats or the media? Male democrats I talked to at work the day after Clinton's speech, and male liberals commenting in "The Fray" at Slate.
posted by onlyconnect at 11:18 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


And so the Coburn–Obama Transparency Act was... what exactly?

A bill that passed by unanimous conseent in the Senate?
posted by gyc at 11:18 AM on August 29, 2008


Is there a source that shows Palin is a young-Earth creationist (Earth is only 6000 years old), or is she just a creationist (God got things going 4.5B years ago)? The two are pretty different.
posted by olinerd at 7:11 PM on August 29


They are both predicated on magic, and neither is science.
posted by plexi at 11:19 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Beauty pageant participants are not automatically stupid, and no one here is saying that.

Yeah, and I'm sure that's why people keep bringing it up in order to dismiss her. Stay classy, guys.
posted by jsonic at 11:20 AM on August 29, 2008


'sup /b/?

I don't think think that there's anything sexist or chauvinistic about deriding any part of Palin questionable qualifications to be VP. In case anyone has been in a coma for the past seven years, let me remind them that the stakes are FAR TOO IMPORTANT to even allow such a person to even compete for the position.

A governor, you say? Yes, she is. Of a corrupt, former territory backwater which she took with 114,000 votes.

People, it's time we returned to 48 states.
posted by jsavimbi at 11:20 AM on August 29, 2008


Conservatives react to Palin.
posted by lunit at 11:20 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Because I oppose Obama's policies and, from my research of her political views, support hers.

Which means you oppose abortion rights and gay rights, while supporting capital punishment and the teaching of creationism in schools. She's a whistle-blower, I grant you that, but according to the Wikipedia, "Governor Palin is currently under investigation by an independent investigator hired by a legislative panel to determine if she abused her power when firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan."

Well, we'll see.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 11:21 AM on August 29, 2008


jsonic, the beauty queen comments are coming from the fact that we're talking about a woman who was, literally, a beauty queen. Why is this an issue for you?

Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep.


Yeah, because when men who are former wrestlers, body builders, and actors campaign for office, no one ever makes comments about the lack of intelligence required in those lines of work. Get off it already.
posted by Nattie at 11:21 AM on August 29, 2008 [22 favorites]


Where does the "ready to lead" part come from? You share her position on policies, so would you be ready to lead if you were working with McCain? Does Palin's 1.5 years as governor tip the scales in her favor over you?

Sure, I would probably be just as ready to lead as Obama. He's been a Senator for 3.5 years, and has pretty much been spending most of that time campaigning to be President. Meanwhile, she's actually been spending her time as Governor actually governing and not running for another office.
posted by gyc at 11:22 AM on August 29, 2008


Besides, she has given birth to five children. Even though she knew that the last one was going to be disabled. This alone proves that she can make the right choices and I trust that she would also be making the right choices as POTUS.

So...every woman who has given birth is qualified to be POTUS? I don't understand the logic here.
posted by agregoli at 11:23 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I seriously think McCain's VP selection was probably the most important part of his campaign.

McCain's choice is much more important than Obama's due to his very real health issues. Thinking that people don't consider the VP of a 72 year old cancer survivor is amazingly naive, so to see so little thought put into this choice is quite remarkable. How did he expect the electorate to imagine her in the White House if something were to happen?

I've been watching his campaign make some pretty stellar blunders lately, but this is astounding. And it was CRUCIAL to get it right the first time.
posted by butterstick at 11:24 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If I'm not mistaken McCain, Obama and Biden all profess to believe in the Zombie Carpenter From Galilee so what does that say about them?

Point.
posted by rokusan at 11:24 AM on August 29, 2008


I'd much rather have Palin as my President than Obama.

Wow, you must really hate America, huh.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 11:26 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


I've read fifty-seven different people pointing out how this choice torpedoes McCain's previous attack on Obama's inexperience, but it seems everyone is missing the OTHER attack on Obama that this mitigates.

Palin named two of her children after TV witches. Witches.

You read it here first: I don't trust her. She's a secret pagan.
posted by rokusan at 11:26 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


lunit, thanks for the link.

Tokenism. Can anyone say with a straight face that Palin would have gotten picked if she were a man?
posted by Surfurrus at 11:27 AM on August 29, 2008


anastasiav: I'm a hardcore Dem and Obama supporter. I wish McCain had picked Olympia. She rocks.

I agree, but a lot of republicans consider Olympia a liberal, which means she was never in the running.
posted by SteveInMaine at 11:27 AM on August 29, 2008


A bill that passed by unanimous conseent in the Senate?

Well, exactly. So I'm still trying to figure out how you can tout Palin's work against government corruption and yet say that you "haven't seen anything like that" from Obama, when he was one of the Senators who introduced the act. I mean, I have no illusions about persuading you to vote for the man, but if you're going to not vote for him, at least try to be accurate in your reasons why.
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:27 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Also, heh heh headline: McCain taps Alaska Gov. Palin

Oh, to be a Daily Show writer today.
posted by rokusan at 11:28 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Even though she knew that the last one was going to be disabled. This alone proves that she can make the right choices and I trust that she would also be making the right choices as POTUS.

CrassFilter: I'd honestly have t say that she lacks the killer instinct that I'd like to see in my [potential] Commander in Chief.
posted by jsavimbi at 11:29 AM on August 29, 2008


Which means you oppose abortion rights and gay rights, while supporting capital punishment and the teaching of creationism in schools. She's a whistle-blower, I grant you that, but according to the Wikipedia, "Governor Palin is currently under investigation by an independent investigator hired by a legislative panel to determine if she abused her power when firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan."

I'm sure you agree 100% on every issue with your chosen candidate, right? Such as subsidies for corn ethanol and high tariffs for imported cellulosic ethanol, telecom immunity, being for the Bush-Cheney energy bill, being against gay marriage, and picking a corporate shill as Veep, right?
posted by gyc at 11:29 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wikipedia better get rid of this pic of Palin giving a speech.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 11:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If I'm not mistaken McCain, Obama and Biden all profess to believe in the Zombie Carpenter From Galilee so what does that say about them?

So? There's a real different between being religious and being an extremist (what do you think a creationist is?) who wants to force schools to teach only their brand of craziness? Or are all non-atheists 100% alike?
posted by damn dirty ape at 11:31 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


plexi: agreed (I'm as atheist as they come), but to me, it's the difference between real fundamentalism and more mainstream Christianity. One scares the hell out of me, the other makes me a little nervous.

(Voting Obama in any case; just want to know what to argue about with the Republican parents)
posted by olinerd at 11:31 AM on August 29, 2008


Well, gvc, you're the one that made the original statement, not me.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 11:32 AM on August 29, 2008


agregoli, sour cream was making fun of how a McCain voter might defend the Palin choice, I think. Read his/her comment again.
posted by Kwine at 11:32 AM on August 29, 2008


She hunts wookies! And wears their pelts!
posted by Artw at 11:32 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Plus, all the posts in here about how she only thinks the world is 4000 or 6000 years old are rather misguided, and it does her a lot of disrespect to paint her as a fundamentalist if she's not.

If she is, though, all's fair.
posted by olinerd at 11:32 AM on August 29, 2008


“She’s not from these parts, and she’s not from Washington, but when you get to know her, you’re going to be as impressed as I am,” Mr. McCain said as he introduced Ms. Palin to a crowd estimated by his campaign to be 15,000 at the Ervin J. Nutter Center here.

I am a Brit and this is far better than any soap opera, well did McCain deliberately chose the Nutter center to make this announcement from, Micheal Palin is this your doing?
posted by dollyknot at 11:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


so what does that say about them?

That they are all willing to tell a few unverifiable lies to pander to people who are demonstrably gullible, and to whom that fairy tale is extremely important?
posted by dirtdirt at 11:33 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Republican McCain picks woman as running mate
Keep it classy CNN.

Really though, what? Did they say "Obama picks man as running mate?" Obama picks caucasian as running mate?" Of course not, they would have just used Biden's name. Argh. This shit makes me mad. I guess they're just being honest though, I mean the reason she was chosen is that she's a woman.
posted by arcticwoman at 11:34 AM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


It seems like most of the Obama supporters on Mefi (which is sort of redundant) think that this choice was a really bad idea for McCain.

I'm not sure they are the most reliable judges on this issue.
posted by Slap Factory at 11:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Ah yes, Kwine. Sorry, sour cream. Reads too closely to actual rhetoric these days.
posted by agregoli at 11:35 AM on August 29, 2008


She hunts wookies! And wears their pelts!

artw, more likely to be a wampa. Cold weather, don'tcha know.
posted by Guy_Inamonkeysuit at 11:35 AM on August 29, 2008


Is there a source that shows Palin is a young-Earth creationist (Earth is only 6000 years old), or is she just a creationist (God got things going 4.5B years ago)? The two are pretty different.

I'm going to guess that she'll probably "believe" both depending on the audience.

"Teach the controversy about Evolution!" is a dog-whistle that means different things in different settings. If Palin said something like that in a Baptist church, most listeners would *think* that she means a 6000 year old Earth. If she said something like that in, say, a Rotary Club meeting, most people would *think* she's just saying "Yeah, the Earth is real old but God created it!"

Creationism isn't about details anyway. Creationism has no details. Modern American Creationism is just a backdoor way to get God and Jesus back into classrooms, so the actual mechanics of little things like the age of the Earth are unimportant to creationist politicians. The most important thing, to them, is putting little stickers in science books that say "JESUS PROBABLY DID THIS!!!" so that kids will see that and stop doing drugs and being gay, or something.
posted by Avenger at 11:35 AM on August 29, 2008 [32 favorites]


Republican McCain picks woman as running mate

Well, it's not like anyone knows anything else about her without googling it.
posted by Artw at 11:36 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


It's still an ad hominem attack for the most part, though.

So? It's an attack that's ad the hominem that's running for election.

This isn't a debate, where "You are a terrible person, therefore your position is invalid" is treyf.

This is an election, where "You are a terrible person, so people should not vote for you" is entirely kosher.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 11:37 AM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


Besides, she has given birth to five children. Even though she knew that the last one was going to be disabled. This alone proves that she can make the right choices and I trust that she would also be making the right choices as POTUS.

What if she gets pregnant with #6 while in office?
posted by bink at 11:37 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.

Population of Alaska: 683,478
Population of Fort Worth, TX: 681,818

If I'm not mistaken McCain, Obama and Biden all profess to believe in the Zombie Carpenter From Galilee so what does that say about them?

They live in a country where you have to profess that to get elected.
posted by kirkaracha at 11:37 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


A choice so crazy that it's political genius. A choice so far from anyone's expectations and so middle America that everybody forgot about that guy who gave a speech in Denver last night and they're talking about Sarah Palin.

I can imagine a GOP strategist saying (a la "Wag the Dog,") "Suppose instead of a VP, we're casting a reality show. Who can we find that is so Middle America that she wouldn't miss the lane if she bowled, could slug back a couple of boilermakers without wincing, clings to guns and religion hard enough to make Obama stop looking off into the distance and gaze at her and has some experience in elected office." I think a lot of Americans will see themselves in her.
posted by Frank Grimes at 11:37 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


She just said "nuke-ular."
posted by [NOT HERMITOSIS-IST] at 11:40 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Jesus tap-dancing Christ. If McCain wanted a former beauty queen with no experience and a criminal investigation on her record I don’t know why he didn’t just pick his own wife.
Tell us how you really feel . . .

I'm amazed he picked her with that investigation still outstanding. It's a huge distraction. Did he even really vet her?
posted by Critical_Beatdown at 11:40 AM on August 29, 2008


I think a lot of Americans will see themselves in her.

Too bad the likelihood is that those those same Americans won't follow that thought to its logical conclusion, namely, most of us aren't anywhere nearly qualified enough to be Vice President of the United States. Me, I'd be pissing myself in abject terror.
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:41 AM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Oh good Christ...
posted by Artw at 11:41 AM on August 29, 2008


olinerd: Is there a source that shows Palin is a young-Earth creationist (Earth is only 6000 years old), or is she just a creationist (God got things going 4.5B years ago)? The two are pretty different.

rokusan's comment made me go looking to confirm that and I couldn't. All I'm finding is that she said creationism should be discussed in school (backing off from a previous statement where she appeared to say it should be part of Alaska public school curriculum) and that she believes there is a creator. So this may be an equivalent of the "Obama is a Muslim" FUD.
posted by XMLicious at 11:42 AM on August 29, 2008


A choice so far from anyone's expectations and so middle America that everybody forgot about that guy who gave a speech in Denver last night and they're talking about Sarah Palin.

Which is all well and good, but you need to have more bullets in the gun to satisfy the media machine, or else they will bury you. In other words, you can steal thunder now (and everyone knew you could, simply because of the timing of the conventions), but what will you talk about on the Monday morning after the Republican convention?

McCain will talk about patriotism.
Obama will talk about hope.
Biden will talk about that time he knocked back beers with world leaders and all his time in the Senate.
Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?

It's not a good long-term move, IMO.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 11:44 AM on August 29, 2008


Little known facts about Sarah Palin

Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin keeps her hair in a beehive to hide her ninja weaponry.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin will send Biden a pre-debate cheat sheet. The sheet will have tips on defending against Kung Fu Death Grip.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin became governor because five children left her with too much spare energy.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin's hotness is the largest single contributor to melting polar ice caps.

...and so on
posted by Class Goat at 11:44 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


So? There's a real different between being religious and being an extremist

The difference is one epiphany. One "I saw the light" moment is all that separates the casually religious from the "True Believers". And if, as some have mentioned, they don't really believe but need to say they do, well, I guess it's ok to take advantage of people's personal beliefs for your own political gain. All's fair in love and war after all.
posted by MikeMc at 11:44 AM on August 29, 2008


Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?

Palin will talk about getting rid of corruption.
posted by Class Goat at 11:45 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Now you'll have another target for misogynist vitriol besides Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin.

As opposed to Islamophobic bigotry for someone who isn't even Muslim, of course.

Interesting tactic, for Republican thugs to call anyone who questions Palin's choice a misogynist, when Palin was picked by a man, McCain, for the cynical reason that she is a woman.

How you guys get away with this, I'll never figure out. But it's fascinating to see you get away with this tactic time and time again. It never gets old.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 11:46 AM on August 29, 2008 [21 favorites]


A governor, you say? Yes, she is. Of a corrupt, former territory backwater which she took with 114,000 votes.

You make her sound almost..."Clintonesque".
posted by MikeMc at 11:47 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?

She will talk about defending unborn life and other conservative social issues. McCain isn't supported enthusiastically by social conservatives, and Palin fits the bill perfectly.
posted by jsonic at 11:48 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If I'm not mistaken McCain, Obama and Biden all profess to believe in the Zombie Carpenter From Galilee so what does that say about them?

Not sure what it says about them, but casting sweeping generalizations across millions of people in this country who call themselves "Christian" says a lot about you. They all think, feel and believe the same things, right? Way to rise above the intolerance you supposedly rail against.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:49 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin will talk about getting rid of corruption.

McCain’s VP Choice Is Under Ethics Investigation For Abuse Of Power In Alaska
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 11:50 AM on August 29, 2008


kyleg: I want to know why the hell McCain was fiddling with his wedding ring during her speech.

I thought this was a joke, but I watched the video- you're totally right, and it's totally creepy.
posted by mkultra at 11:50 AM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Reminds me of the chutzpah & cynicism involved when GHW Bush appointed Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall. Hey- Palin's a woman, Hillary's a woman, and all women are just alike. Right?

Clarence Thomas is to Thurgood Marshall as Sarah Palin is to Hillary Clinton.

Chalk & cheese.
posted by squalor at 11:52 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?

about her husband hit by shrapnel in Iraq

about her son who'll be deployed in Iraq on 9/11

about the time when the doctor told her she was carrying a Down's syndrome baby and she decided to keep it

about hockey, PTAs, hockey moms, etc.

all while looking so very white, so very American, smalltown American, so very non threatening.

So non-Muslim.
posted by matteo at 11:52 AM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin keeps her hair in a beehive to hide her ninja weaponry.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin will send Biden a pre-debate cheat sheet. The sheet will have tips on defending against Kung Fu Death Grip.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin became governor because five children left her with too much spare energy.
Little Known Fact: Sarah Palin's hotness is the largest single contributor to melting polar ice caps.


I will vote for whichever presidential campaign promises to have Chuck-Norrisian yucksters dragged out to the old granite quarry and shot in the head.
posted by Uppity Pigeon #2 at 11:53 AM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]



Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?

Palin will talk about getting rid of corruption.


She's decided to withdraw already?
posted by Bookhouse at 11:54 AM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin will talk about getting rid of corruption.

"Only Nixon can go to China." - Old Vulcan proverb
posted by Bromius at 11:54 AM on August 29, 2008


I think a lot of Americans will see themselves in her.

Is that sexual innuendo based on her physical attractiveness? If so, I laughed.

I can't keep up.

Honestly, isn't 8 years of this dipshit President (and his even dumber heir apparent in McCain) enough of an argument to kill this "I vote for the candidate I most want to have a beer with" nonsense that idiots like Chris Matthews and Joe Scarborough harp on so endlessly?
posted by psmealey at 11:55 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Sorry, I learned about her creationism right here in this thread... which I will henceforth stop trusting before factchecking. :)
posted by rokusan at 11:56 AM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


They all think, feel and believe the same things, right?

Isn't God creating the Earth one of the bedrock tenets of Christianity (and the other Abrahamic religions) ? If Palin is a "Young Earth" Creationist is she really that far from other Christians many, if not most, of whom believe the Bible is the Divine Word of God?
posted by MikeMc at 11:56 AM on August 29, 2008


Can we please retire "[keep it | stay] classy"?
posted by everichon at 11:58 AM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


all while looking so very white, so very American, smalltown American, so very non threatening.


... and with five kids I guess we know she could be awakened easily by a three am phone call ...

[ oops, she probably has five (undocumented?) nannies! ]
posted by Surfurrus at 12:00 PM on August 29, 2008


Can we please retire "[keep it | stay] classy"?

Classy retired years ago and is fishing up in Lake Obichokee, fifty miles up Rt. 9.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:01 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If Palin is a "Young Earth" Creationist is she really that far from other Christians many, if not most, of whom believe the Bible is the Divine Word of God?

There is actually a large continuum of belief on this matter. Very few of the Catholics I grew up with, and likely none of the Jesuits I knew, regarded the Bible as something to be taken as literal truth.

I am pretty sure this is also true for certain Protestant denominations as well.

/not a believer in anything except Bacchus
posted by everichon at 12:01 PM on August 29, 2008


Wait, so as far as her creationism goes, wanting it to be part of the state educational curriculum isn't damning enough?

I'm sure the red-meat evangelicals will love her for it, but I think that's pretty wrongheaded.
posted by butterstick at 12:01 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


MikeMc: If Palin is a "Young Earth" Creationist is she really that far from other Christians many, if not most, of whom believe the Bible is the Divine Word of God?

In a thread full of allegations of sexism, this has to be the most culturally ignorant thing said here so far.
posted by mkultra at 12:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


She is like "Ice Road Truckers," "Deadliest Catch," "Dirty Jobs," "Survivorman" and "Next Top Model" all rolled into one with a dash of "Orange County Choppers" meets "Wife Swap" (her husband is a snow mobile racer). The GOP saw that TV viewers wanted this and they delivered. Reagan came from Hollywood and now that scripted shows are fading into history it's time for a reality show candidate.
posted by Frank Grimes at 12:03 PM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


The difference is one epiphany.

So? What isnt that true of? Non-religious people convert all the time to being religious and religious people convert to being non-religious. There's no guarantees in life, especially in politics.
posted by damn dirty ape at 12:03 PM on August 29, 2008


If Palin is a "Young Earth" Creationist is she really that far from other Christians many, if not most, of whom believe the Bible is the Divine Word of God?

Yes. Most modern, "enlightened" Christians believe that the Old Testament was crafted in a pre-literate time when such stories had to be told using vivid imagery on their audiences, and that while they agree with the prevailing messages, dismiss the literal "truth" of it.

Not sure where the numbers break down among Christians as a group, but anecdotally most mainline Protestants and Catholics think that "Young Earth" Creationists are morons.
posted by psmealey at 12:03 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


> FYI: I'm a hardcore Dem and Obama supporter. I wish McCain had picked Olympia. She rocks.

Agreed. Sadly, Snowe's brand of Republicanism no longer flies outside of New England and maybe a few other quasi-blue areas. She'd be a no-go in much of the country for exactly the same reasons why I (and probably many other MeFites) find her so attractive as a candidate: she's a secularist, pro-choice, pro-environment, if-not-pro-than-at-least-not-anti-gay Republican. The pro-choice part alone would scuttle her in large parts of the country.

I think at least at one point I remember her being listed as a member/supporter of the Republican Majority for Choice, but they seem to no longer list affiliated members of Congress.
posted by Kadin2048 at 12:04 PM on August 29, 2008


Wait, so as far as her creationism goes, wanting it to be part of the state educational curriculum isn't damning enough?

Oh yeah, that's damning, it's just in no way an excuse to make shit up about here religious beliefs.
posted by XMLicious at 12:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If anything non-religious people are MORE likely to spontaniously convert to the batshitinane branches of religion.
posted by Artw at 12:05 PM on August 29, 2008


Here's the thing: it's not the inexperience--experience as such is not necessarily dispositive--she's not accomplished. She's not a policy wonk; she does not have academic credentials; she has virtually no legislative experience of any kind; nothing in her resume even remotely suggests that she has a clue about matters of national security or foreign policy. I am not impressed. I want to be impressed. I want somebody smart and accomplished in the White House.

You say the same thing about Obama? I say bullshit. Give them both a fucking quiz. In fact, give all four candidates a quiz. Any issue, any policy, the Bible, the history of the Republican party. Whatever.

How we got to calling a law professor, policy expert with a steel trap memory and a powerful, nuanced intellect a naive, inexperienced and unprepared candidate will never cease to amaze me. How we got to calling yet another son of privilege of below average intelligence "ready to lead" and "strong" on foreign policy amazes me even more.

Palin is not impressive. She just isn't. There are impressive conservatives out there--many of them are women. This particular woman is weak sauce, and while clearly a talented politician and not totally frivolous, not the sort of accomplished person, thinker, or intellect--left or right, that can competently occupy the second seat, and, lest we forget, preside over the fucking Senate.
posted by kosem at 12:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [98 favorites]


Also, for whatever it’s worth, I’m totally okay with the fact that Obama is far more of a Christian than McCain.
posted by Artw at 12:07 PM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


What if she gets pregnant with #6 while in office?

What is that supposed to mean?
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 12:08 PM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


Did he even really vet her?

Not he, per se, but they did and their pick is great. They're surrendering the election before their own convention and they're getting their ducks lined up for 2012. All the while showing that McCain received what he was promised and they build some capital with the nut wing and women voters by throwing Palin up there.

The outcome is great for them, even though they lose this one. If she does well, they'll be able to use her to help build up the candidates in the next election, generating goodwill and plenty of TV coverage because SHE'S A GOOD LOOKING WOMAN. Maybe she'll even take over for Stevens. If she does poorly, come next election when women republicans demand another candidate (I'm being silly here), the good ol' boys can come back and say "Look, we gave it a shot, but women just aren't electable" and the issue won't rear its head for another fifty years. And they can say the same thing to "values voters". All this paves the way for Michael Bloomberg, a serious candidate with experience, in 2012.

You read it here first.
posted by jsavimbi at 12:08 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Cool Papa Bell: McCain will talk about patriotism.
Obama will talk about hope.
Biden will talk about that time he knocked back beers with world leaders and all his time in the Senate.
Palin will talk about ... talk about ... umm ... ?


Palin will talk about how the doctor told her that her child will have Down syndrome.
How she discussed the issue with her family.
How she made a decision.
How she held the little baby in her arms and it was sooo sweet and she realized it was the right decision (which she knew all along).

And the whole country will go: Awwwwww...

How she can't understand that anyone can even consider murdering such a sweet little baby.
How hundred thousands are killed every year. Not in Iraq, but in our hospitals.
How it is now your turn to make the right decision on election day.

Thereby giving you the choice to vote for her ticket or for the baby killers.
posted by sour cream at 12:09 PM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


Isn't God creating the Earth one of the bedrock tenets of Christianity (and the other Abrahamic religions) ?

Sure, but there's the notion that God created the Big Bang, God created the universe but not 6,000 years ago, and so on. Not everyone believes the Bible is a science textbook. I guess what really irks me about this is I have to not only watch the Talibaptists strangle this country just like everyone else, but I watch them strangle my faith as well. Where's the tolerance and forgiveness among these people? If the topic of religion comes up in mixed company - and it's a topic I avoid like the plague - I'll hear otherwise tolerant and intelligent people describe Christians as clinic-bombing, snake-handling, tongue-speaking, neo-fascist pricks. And the sad part is, I can't really blame them. It's the evangelicals who've muscled their way into the spotlight for the past 25 years or so. It doesn't matter how many other political leaders in history, in this country, and in the world in general have been both professed Christians and perfectly reasonable and tolerant people - it's the Pentacostalist voodoo men who get the air time. And my same multi-cultural, feminist, anti-war friends will use the word "Christian" as pretty much synonyous with these insane bigots. It just sicks and saddens me.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


The Dinosaur and the Ditz. One can't remember anything after he was released from his POW camp, the other is campaigning for a job without knowing what it is.

"Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep."

She believes in Creationism. She's not smart enough for school board.
posted by klangklangston at 12:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Ta-daaa! VPILF.COM
posted by Class Goat at 12:11 PM on August 29, 2008


You're scaring me with how good at this you are.
posted by Artw at 12:11 PM on August 29, 2008


(That would be sour cream, not Mr. Goat)
posted by Artw at 12:12 PM on August 29, 2008


I think a lot of Americans will see themselves in her.

That is just super. The last time we voted for a president because he seemed "just like us" we got.....well, you all know what we got......we got a simpleton shoved up our collective backsides. I am really glad that federal employees like McCain have really great health care plans.
posted by Seymour Zamboni at 12:12 PM on August 29, 2008


Metafilter: batshitinane.
posted by cog_nate at 12:12 PM on August 29, 2008


"Wait, so as far as her creationism goes, wanting it to be part of the state educational curriculum isn't damning enough?"

Oh yeah, that's damning, it's just in no way an excuse to make shit up about here religious beliefs.


Fair enough, and noted. I see that some do, but I take no issue with her beliefs (cloudy as they are as of yet). I take issue with an attempt to foist them on schoolchildren, so as far as I'm concerned she's still got shitty judgment.
posted by butterstick at 12:14 PM on August 29, 2008


In a thread full of allegations of sexism, this has to be the most culturally ignorant thing said here so far.

This is America, there is no culture here.

and that while they agree with the prevailing messages, dismiss the literal "truth" of it.

Not sure where the numbers break down among Christians as a group, but anecdotally most mainline Protestants and Catholics think that "Young Earth" Creationists are morons.


I agree that most mainline Christians don't take the Bible literally, but if you don't why bother calling yourself a Christian? I would think Unitarian might be a better choice. Is it just me?.
posted by MikeMc at 12:15 PM on August 29, 2008


Maybe she'll even take over for Stevens.

BWAAHAAHAHAHAHA! Please tell me you're kidding. Because you are, after all, talking about someone WHO DOES NOT HAVE A LEGAL DEGREE.

I am seriously having a Mugatu-esqe "I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" moment about that prediction.
posted by shiu mai baby at 12:15 PM on August 29, 2008


Voters can be willfully smart or stubbornly stupid, so it's hard to see how this will go over. Either way, the past two elections and their practical results have taught me that whatever the outcome, as a whole we pretty much get the president we earn and deserve.
posted by troybob at 12:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Todd Palin
posted by small_ruminant at 12:17 PM on August 29, 2008


Ta-daaa! VPILF.COM

Vice Presidents I'd Like to Fuck?

Is this what Republicans meant by picking her based on her merits? It's nice to see your party show such respect for your own candidate.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:19 PM on August 29, 2008


Oh wait -- I just realized you were probably referring to Series of Tubes Ted, and not the most senior member of the Supreme Court. Sorry about that.

You were talking about Ted, right?
posted by shiu mai baby at 12:20 PM on August 29, 2008


It's the evangelicals who've muscled their way into the spotlight for the past 25 years or so.

It's the non-evangelicals who have remained conveniently silent about them when it happens to suit their moralizing or political needs.
posted by troybob at 12:22 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin opposes listing polar bears as a threatened species.

Why? Because it could restrict the oil industry that fills her pockets. I can't help but wonder if the republican VP position is now a defacto big-oil position.
posted by furtive at 12:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Reminds me of the chutzpah & cynicism involved when GHW Bush appointed Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall.

Or like when Jack Ryan dropped out of the 2004 Senate race against Obama and the GOP replaced him with Alan Keyes.


You're going to hear a lot about Palin's toughness, demonstrated by her delivering a speech after her water broke when she was carrying her fifth child. Here's a reply to a Nat Hentoff column (scroll down to the last comment by JakeW) that takes a different view of her actions and contrasts it against her pro-life positions:
Palin made the decision to travel to Texas to a Governor's conference while 36 weeks pregnant, a time during which obstetricians would tell you it’s foolish to travel via plane. Air travel is a known risk for pregnancy complications, which is indeed what happened. The governor, while on a self-promoting trip to deliver a speech, had premature rupture of fetal membranes: her water broke.

Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK. Premature rupture of membranes can lead to life-threatening infection and premature delivery.

What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK. She called her family practice doctor in Alaska for advice. What advice was given isn’t clear, but it’s clearly quoted that she "did not ask for a medical OK to fly". Whether it was OK to fly should be the FIRST question anyone considering traveling by air should have, if they were at all interested in protecting the life of the unborn. Regardless, she decided to give her speech at the conference without having any evaluation other than the long-distance advice of a family practitioner. Her speech was more important to her than making any effort to make sure her unborn child was OK. Then, she decided to fly back to Alaska, an 11-hour trip. In addition, she failed to inform flight personnel that her water had broken.
I don't know much about obstetrics, so I can't really judge whether JakeW's accusations have any merit. But it's an interesting take on a story that's going to be coming up a lot.
posted by hydrophonic at 12:24 PM on August 29, 2008 [32 favorites]


When I casually mentioned this lady as McCain's choice today (while at the gym) three out of three times I was told by each person I was speaking to that they were voting for McCain.

No, the deal is that we have a woman who's been governor of of a state (population of which is smaller than Obama's congressional district) for a mere 18 months, and before that was a mayor of a town smaller than the one where Elvis was born. We've got that and the beauty queen thing to go on

We have someone who is just about as far away from the Washington beltway as it is possible to get. Someone who has already been known to fight against corruption. Someone who has proved she is a very strong campaigner, even when her own party was not a fan of hers. Joe Sixpack is gonna be thrilled.

Guys, I hear you re the experience thing, but I think you'd better not underestimate this woman. It takes a really strong, really forceful person to do what she has done and not only that, at the same time be a parent to five children. She is not only prolife but has a down's syndrome child in a time where many of these children are indeed aborted. People like my son, who up until now was planning to write in a candidate rather than vote for either, are going to at the very least sit up and take notice.

I had never even heard of her before today, but I think we'd all better fasten our seatbelts. We ain't seen nuttin' yet. This is gonna be quite a ride.
posted by konolia at 12:25 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin will talk about getting rid of corruption.

Republican corruption? That should be fun to watch.
posted by The Card Cheat at 12:26 PM on August 29, 2008


[Todd] Palin's advocacy dovetails neatly with his wife's No. 1 priority: forging a construction contract with private companies to transport natural gas from the North Slope to the Lower 48. The export of natural gas would presumably replace revenue from the state's dwindling oil reserves, which funded 80 percent of the state budget last year.


The oil connections get thicker.
posted by furtive at 12:27 PM on August 29, 2008


Harriet Miers Jr.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:28 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


What if she gets pregnant with #6 while in office?

What is that supposed to mean?


Just that: what if? She is still of childbearing age, had the last one just a few months ago, and hasn't gone four years without being pregnant in a while; I think it's relevant. How would the stresses of such a job combine with a pregnancy? She's had babies while in office in Alaska, but how does that translate to the far bigger job of VP or POTUS?
posted by bink at 12:30 PM on August 29, 2008


MikeMc : I agree that most mainline Christians don't take the Bible literally, but if you don't why bother calling yourself a Christian? I would think Unitarian might be a better choice. Is it just me?

Yeah, that would be just you. Christians generally call themselves Christians because they believe that Christ was a divine being. (And I've even run into some who don't believe that and still call themselves Christians.)

</atheist>
posted by XMLicious at 12:30 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Oops, that should be ...is a divine being.
posted by XMLicious at 12:31 PM on August 29, 2008


Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep.

LOL. The repub defenders are revealing their hidden prejudices, methinks.
posted by Mental Wimp at 12:32 PM on August 29, 2008


It's the non-evangelicals who have remained conveniently silent about them when it happens to suit their moralizing or political needs.

Some have remained silent, but I think it's erroneous to claim that you know why. Maybe some people believe they can be worked with, and toned down. Others, like Richard Cizik, have tried changing the structure from within. Others still see idiots like Robertson and Haggard call themselves Christian, then hear their own friends talk about Christians in general as being crazy fascists, and think, "Well, fuck this." Sure, it avoids a moral obligation to right a wrong, but I think it's perfectly natural that some people just don't get involved in the entire discussion - not right, just understandable. I think there's also some complicity in believe that Christians are more easily represented by people like Swaggart than people like Tutu - that it's the hypocritical grandstander, and not the civil activist, who best represents what being Christian means.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:32 PM on August 29, 2008


Pat Buchanan said that the Palin pick was the "biggest political gamble I believe just about in American political history." Interesting thing to say about a candidate like McCain with a known weakness for craps.
Only recently have McCain's aides urged him to pull back from the pastime. In the heat of the G.O.P. primary fight last spring, he announced on a visit to the Vegas Strip that he was going to the casino floor. When his aides stopped him, fearing a public relations disaster, McCain suggested that they ask the casino to take a craps table to a private room, a high-roller privilege McCain had indulged in before. His aides, with alarm bells ringing, refused again, according to two accounts of the discussion.

"He clearly knows that this is on the borderline of what is acceptable for him to be doing," says a Republican who has watched McCain play. "And he just sort of revels in it."
Did McCain roll the dice with the vice presidency?
posted by gerryblog at 12:33 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


VPILF.COM

Oy god.
posted by cortex at 12:33 PM on August 29, 2008


Just that: what if? She is still of childbearing age

You realize you are essentially questioning if a woman can be president or VP because she might get preggers, right?
posted by jsonic at 12:33 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


MikeMc, you don't know much about Xtianity in the United States, do you?
posted by everichon at 12:34 PM on August 29, 2008


We have someone who is just about as far away from the Washington beltway as it is possible to get.

This, IMHO, is her strongest selling point and appeals to people, like myself, who are tired of the same tired faces and the same "business as usual" candidates. If only Obama and McCain would swap running mates. Two entrenched Beltway hands vs. a couple of fresh young faces, that would be a race for the ages.
posted by MikeMc at 12:35 PM on August 29, 2008


How would the stresses of such a job combine with a pregnancy?

Not super well, but I know lots of women who have had babies while holding down a stressful job. Everybody involved is fine.

Also, I hope she loses.
posted by Camofrog at 12:35 PM on August 29, 2008


It's the non-evangelicals who have remained conveniently silent about them when it happens to suit their moralizing or political needs.

Some have remained silent, but I think it's erroneous to claim that you know why.


I didn't claim to know why. Just when.
posted by troybob at 12:36 PM on August 29, 2008


You realize you are essentially questioning if a woman can be president or VP because she might get preggers, right?

No kidding. Yes, being Vice President or President is stressful. I don't know of any job that isn't stressful (and if there is a stress-free job out there, could someone please tell me where it is, because I'm about to snap necks over here, and I am not anywhere near Vice President of the US). Women have been getting pregnant since the beginning of history, and the working world hasn't come to end, so should Palin chose to add to her familiy while holding the office of Vice President, I'm sure everyone will be just fine.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 12:37 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


You realize you are essentially questioning if a woman can be president or VP because she might get preggers, right?

You realize your party regularly questions if Obama can be president because he is black and has a Muslim-sounding name, right?
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:38 PM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


I think the saddest thing about all of this is, it shows what a crap system democracy is.

Well it might be as Churchill stated "It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried"

The problem is, all the followers of Goebbels out there, think language should not be used for communication, the only purpose of language is to manipulate, but wait the Neocons did not use language, they used semiotics, they said go for the Billary vote by waving a beauty queen at us.

The low opinion most advertisers and spammers, have for the rest of humanity is indicative of the problem.

I vote Chinese.
posted by dollyknot at 12:40 PM on August 29, 2008


When I casually mentioned this lady as McCain's choice today (while at the gym) three out of three times I was told by each person I was speaking to that they were voting for McCain.

When I casually mentioned this woman as McCain's choice today (while at the gym) three out of three times I was told by each person I was speaking to that they were voting for Obama.
posted by ericb at 12:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I agree with DaShiv that this is a risky move with potential huge payoffs for McCain. I think the elections of 2000 and 2004 showed very clearly that winning elections when the electorate is divided so closely between conservatives and progressives isn't about appealing to the mythical "independent voter." It's about mobilizing your base, so more of your people than those of your opponent are fired up to go to the polls.

The reason this could pay off so hugely:

1. McCain recognized that social conservatives who were kind of meh about him could be a huge problem. By nominating a social conservative who is on the right side of all those issues, he fires up the base and makes it more likely they'll come out to vote rather than stay home. Her strong anti-choice positions are probably somewhat softened for a lot of moderate Republican women because she supports things like Feminists for Life--a group that pays at least lip service to expanding the resources that unexpectedly pregnant women have so they aren't forced to abort. And true pro-choicers and progressives aren't ever going to vote for McCain anyway, so there's no loss there.

2. McCain has obviously already recognized that not only does he need to get his base to the polls, but he needs to neutralize the enormous groundswell of support that Obama has from the left. I'd argue that his ads talking about how Hillary was passed over aren't really about convincing her disillusioned supporters to vote for him--that'd be a tough sell--but rather to keep them angry and disillusioned enough that they just don't show up at all. His choice of Palin is probably going to be really effective on this score as well. What do you want to bet we're going to see a bunch of the petty, sexist crap** flung at her that was flung at Hillary? Seeing that shit for 2 months won't make a lot of women want to vote for McCain, but it very well may make a lot of them stay home, reasoning that they can't in good conscience vote for either candidate because they're too disgusted with the whole thing.

**To all those who say "talking about her derisively for being in a beauty pagent isn't sexist!!", I'd urge you to read onlyconnect's comment, which hits the nail on the head. You don't have to agree with her analysis, but if you weren't someone who thought that Hillary faced a lot of sexist bullshit in the primaries, you're not really the target of this anyway. I was someone who was pissed off at her treatment, and I absolutely see how 2 months of crap from Democrats along those lines would make it hard for me to want to show up and vote, no matter how much I hate McCain. Which is probably exactly what McCain is going for.
posted by iminurmefi at 12:41 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I watched her speech on CNN this morning and felt like I was being given a cheery yet unpleasant talking to by the church lady. That voice! Poor McCain looks all that much more on death's door standing next to her, even though she'd incredibly prim and oldish for her age. She looks more like my grandmother than my mother, by a long shot.

Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?

I am hoping for the best for you long suffering Americans, I don't know how you can stand the cynical moves, the lies, the smears, and the hypocrisy for such a protracted length of time and all done with so much gusto! The republicans really seem to revel in it, it's gross. You really need to have shortened campaign time frame, written in law (not to mention pencil & paper ballots right across the country). I can only watch a few minutes of this stuff on your news and I start to feeling incredibly anxious, it takes my breath away. I'm gonna have to avoid it altogether now, since poor old Canada is about to be thrust into a federal election and I'll need all my nerve for that particular crock of shit, lol.

Best of luck Democrats, you have the best candidate, may he win.
posted by zarah at 12:42 PM on August 29, 2008


MikeMc, you don't know much about Xtianity in the United States, do you?

I try no to. Between Catholics, evangelicals, mainline Protestants, Mormons, Greek Orthodox, Coptics, Amish, Mennonites, Chaldeans etc... it's all too much for me to keep track of.
posted by MikeMc at 12:44 PM on August 29, 2008


>It's the non-evangelicals who have remained conveniently silent about them when it happens to suit their moralizing or political needs.

>Some have remained silent, but I think it's erroneous to claim that you know why.

>I didn't claim to know why. Just when.


Huh. Still sounds like you're claiming you know the reasons behind the silence of some, but alright.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:44 PM on August 29, 2008


You realize you are essentially questioning if a woman can be president or VP because she might get preggers, right?

You realize what a misguided question this is, right?

Aside from Palin hypothetically bearing a child, you realize the Republican party also does anything it can to make life miserable for almost all working pregnant women and low-income families trying to raise children in the United States, right?
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:44 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


She believes in Creationism. She's not smart enough for school board.

Reagan, Creatonist: 8 years in office.

Bush II, Creatonist: 8 years in office

Bush I, unclear, but his VP was indeed a proud creationist: 4 years in office.

Mondale, Kerry, Edwards, Gore -- all non-Creatonists.

see, this is why Republicans get such a kick out of beating you guys, because you always, always get it wrong about this stuff.


People like my son, who up until now was planning to write in a candidate rather than vote for either, are going to at the very least sit up and take notice

oh, Palin will energize the fetus/Jesus base, nobody here is denying that. McCain, for all his talk about bogus stories of "gooks" (his word, not mine) drawing crosses in the dirt, is indeed secular and has little love for the fundies (who hate him back, despite his solid anti-Roe record). what's your point? everybody knows she's good to energize the fundies (except those who have a problem with her Catholicism, there must still be some anti-Papists out there).

(while at the gym)


this would not be one of those gyms right next -- or inside -- evangelical church compounds, right? just to have a better idea about where your sample is coming from.
posted by matteo at 12:45 PM on August 29, 2008


Blaze and TPS, I'm starting to really like you guys. I may have to go lie down somewhere with a cool towel on my forehead.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 12:46 PM on August 29, 2008


Is there a source that shows Palin is a young-Earth creationist (Earth is only 6000 years old), or is she just a creationist (God got things going 4.5B years ago)? The two are pretty different.

The latter isn't even a scientific question, it's theological. If she wants creationism taught in the classroom (and she does), she is arguing against accepted science and believes in the former. The attempt to conflate the two is a political strategy for some.
posted by Mental Wimp at 12:47 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


The oil connections get thicker.
That's a particularly viscous attack.
posted by Floydd at 12:47 PM on August 29, 2008 [13 favorites]


I don't see a conflict between her claims of feminism and her participation in beauty pageants or pro-life behavior. There's nothing in feminism that directly forbids opportunism, to my knowledge.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 12:48 PM on August 29, 2008


Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?

ENOUGH
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:48 PM on August 29, 2008


What if she gets pregnant with #6 while in office?

This being a prime example of #2 above. If Biden--putting his foot in his mouth as he seems somewhat wont to do when speaking off-the-cuff (remember when he called Obama "articulate"?)--ever said something like this, I think it'd kill my vote. I hate to say that, because I hate McCain with heat of a thousand suns, but I absolutely, positively couldn't vote for a candidate who even suggested something like this.

And I'd bet dollars to donuts that I'm not the only female Democrat who feels this way. It'd only take one or two sexist gaffes to keep enough potential voters home to deliver toss-up states like Virginia.
posted by iminurmefi at 12:48 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


How would the stresses of such a job combine with a pregnancy? She's had babies while in office in Alaska, but how does that translate to the far bigger job of VP or POTUS?

Yeah! Or what if she got PMS? She could get hysterical!

But seriously, it doesn't seem like any more of an issue than Cheney's bum ticker or McCain's melanoma. This is what we have the 25th Amendment for.
posted by XMLicious at 12:49 PM on August 29, 2008


Women have been getting pregnant since the beginning of history, and the working world hasn't come to end

Yes, but they tend to take maternity leaves to do it. Does the office have a provision for that? What if there's a war on at the time?
posted by bink at 12:50 PM on August 29, 2008


Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?

"Party Unity, My Ass!" It refers to Hillary supporters who don't want to support Obama because they hold a grudge about how Hillary was treated.
posted by Class Goat at 12:51 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


bink, did you miss that she didn't take maternity leave for the last one?
posted by agregoli at 12:51 PM on August 29, 2008


Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?

ENOUGH


Is that an actual answer (some other acronym I'm ignorant of) or are you yelling at me for some reason? I briefly googled and came up with a sneaker and a wild cat.
posted by zarah at 12:52 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Either way, the past two elections and their practical results have taught me that whatever the outcome, as a whole we pretty much get the president we earn and deserve.
If the vote hadn't been oursourced to private, for profit, Republican organizations, who view tallying MY VOTE as a "trade secret", I'd agree with you.

As it is, I think Gore won. And Kerry did too. (The putzes.)
posted by Critical_Beatdown at 12:52 PM on August 29, 2008


If Biden--putting his foot in his mouth as he seems somewhat wont to do when speaking off-the-cuff (remember when he called Obama "articulate"?)--ever said something like this, I think it'd kill my vote.

So never mind the billions of dollars Biden set aside for the Violence Against Women Act. He says something stupid off the cuff, that trumps his voting record, which is one of the most pro-women in the Congress?

Forgive me if that strikes me as a little short-sighted.
posted by Astro Zombie at 12:53 PM on August 29, 2008 [20 favorites]


"Party Unity, My Ass!" It refers to Hillary supporters who don't want to support Obama because they hold a grudge about how Hillary was treated.

Oh, I see! Thank you Class Goat!
posted by zarah at 12:53 PM on August 29, 2008


Yes, but they tend to take maternity leaves to do it. Does the office have a provision for that? What if there's a war on at the time?

I wonder if elected officials are covered by the Familiy and Medical Leave Act? Anyone know?

Beyond that question, I find it funny that the same people who would yell themself blue about hating this woman would also yell at her for taking any leave. We think you're lousy at your job, and you better not take one day off, either!!!
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 12:53 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


All this "what if she gets preggers?" talk sounds like some serious false flag bullshit to me.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


It takes a really strong, really forceful person to do what she has done and not only that, at the same time be a parent to five children. She is not only prolife but has a down's syndrome child in a time where many of these children are indeed aborted.

I think Konolia makes a good point here. Unless she has been extremely wealthy her whole life, this does denote a strong and strong-willed woman who may present a formidable opponent in the race. We would be unwise to underestimate her, in spite of her misguided beauty pageant forays.
posted by Mental Wimp at 12:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If she & McCain promise to campaign in pelts for the rest of the election season, they will have my attention. Not my vote, just my attention.
posted by Wolfdog at 12:55 PM on August 29, 2008


Ta-daaa! VPILF.COM

Well, that was...fast...
posted by kittens for breakfast at 12:55 PM on August 29, 2008


Is that an actual answer (some other acronym I'm ignorant of) or are you yelling at me for some reason?

Sorry about that, didn't mean to yell. There's been a lot of talk about these people here lately, and I'm all Swift Boated out.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:57 PM on August 29, 2008


Palin says she felt safe flying to Alaska to have baby
posted by SteveInMaine at 12:57 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


You realize your party regularly questions if Obama can be president because he is black and has a Muslim-sounding name, right?

Really? The Republican Party has said Obama can't be president because he's black? I'm well aware that some voters think that. Then again, some lefty voters believe some dumb things too.

You realize what a misguided question this is, right?

Someone implies that a women can't be president due to preggers. I point this out, and you say I'm the one who's misguided? Is that really a position you want to take?
posted by jsonic at 1:00 PM on August 29, 2008


For the record, I am in possession of a set of ovaries myself, and wouldn't vote for her in a million years. I'm just asking questions about something that could potentially take someone off a pretty significant job for a few months. There's no woman-hating motive here, I'm just curious about what would happen. What's wrong with wondering about these eventualities?
posted by bink at 1:01 PM on August 29, 2008


How is babby flown?
posted by orthogonality at 1:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [11 favorites]


bink, did you miss that she didn't take maternity leave for the last one?
I did miss that. That's exactly the kind of information I was wondering about. Thanks.
posted by bink at 1:04 PM on August 29, 2008


this would not be one of those gyms right next -- or inside -- evangelical church compounds, right?

No, it's owned by our local hospital. The three I spoke with were my male spin instructor (who went to a Benedictine college and originally told me he liked Hillary a few months ago), another instructor (married to a military guy) and a friend of mine, also an instructor, who is a casual mostly nonpracticing Catholic and fairly liberal type. That latter person liked Obama originally but was turned off by the brouhaha re his former pastor.
posted by konolia at 1:04 PM on August 29, 2008


Would you call this comment about how she played fast and loose with the safety of her unborn child, which unless I am TOTALLY mistaken was the one who we now know has Downs Syndrome, "misogynistic"? I call it one of the scariest things I have ever heard about a politician of either party.

(cross posted with in the MeTa callout thread)
posted by wendell at 1:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'm probably late to posting this campaign portrait.
posted by empath at 1:06 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


You realize you are essentially questioning if a woman can be president or VP because she might get preggers, right?

You realize McCain voted against the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, right?
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 1:06 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


I wonder if this was the ONLY incident of her risking the life of an unborn child with Downs. Sounds like a Republican Abortion attempt to me.
posted by wendell at 1:07 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Nah, if pro-lifers want abortions they just go ahead and have them.
posted by Artw at 1:08 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Watching her speech, it's interesting to see how they're trying to snag the "Change" meme by going on about how she and McCain are "the best choice for change in Washington."

Also that she spends about 45 seconds talking very vaguely about how she fought some corruption once and then plays the McCain was a POW card.
posted by Shepherd at 1:09 PM on August 29, 2008


What did Sarah Palin do? She did NOT go to a local hospital and did NOT have her baby checked on a fetal monitor to make sure it was OK.

What a maverick.
posted by felix betachat at 1:11 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


You realize McCain voted against the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, right?

Is that the one that the Supreme Court found unconstitutional in United States v. Morrison?
posted by Perplexity at 1:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


It refers to an astroturf group purporting to be Hillary supporters who don't want to support Obama because they hold a grudge about how Hillary was treated.

FTFY
posted by Mental Wimp at 1:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


What if she gets pregnant with #6 while in office?

Bink raises a crucial issue.

WHO WOULD PRESIDE OVER PROCEDURAL MATTERS IN THE SENATE DURING HER BRIEF MATERNITY LEAVE????
(Assuming that the President pro tempore was also pregnant at the time.)
(And also all the junior senators who usually fill in for the President pro tempore to help them learn parliamentary procedure.)
(Also, every other senator.)


WHAT THEN, AMERICA?!?!? Won't someone think of the procedural matters?
posted by designbot at 1:13 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Wow I just stepped out for a minute there and, uh, so what did I miss?
posted by From Bklyn at 1:13 PM on August 29, 2008


One thing a lot of staunch Democrats and staunch Republicans might be forgetting is that there are an awful lot of people out there who while they might be registered for a party are not necessarily folks interested in the party line. They vote for who they like, not necessarily to forward an agenda (anathema, I know, to any true Party partisan.)

So, what I want to know is, how do Joe and Sally Sixpack see a woman like her? THAT will tell you what you need to know re the coming election. Go sit in the Waffle House this weekend, order a cup of coffee, and just listen. Because those are the people who will give us our next administration.
posted by konolia at 1:13 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Paul Begala: "When you're 72 and you have had four bouts with cancer, you ought to choose a qualified VP."
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 1:14 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin Pleased with Obama's Energy Plan ("This is Google's cache of http://www.gov.state.ak.us/news.php?id=1384. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Aug 28, 2008 01:01:30 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime." Whaddaya know, it doesn't seem to be on her site any more.)
posted by kirkaracha at 1:14 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


This was a stupid stupid move by McCain. He's just laid waste to the only line of criticism against Obama that had any momentum.

Also, it reminds everyone that he's old. And not in a good way.
posted by bshort at 1:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I want to know why the hell McCain was fiddling with his wedding ring during her speech.

"His eyes hold Edith, his left hand holds his right.
What does that hand desire, that he grips it so tight ...?"

Joni Mitchell : "Edith and the Kingpin"
posted by essexjan at 1:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is that the one that the Supreme Court found unconstitutional in United States v. Morrison?

Nope. The VAWA is still United States Law. Only the civil rights remedy of VAWA was struck down. Which you could have learned if you just clicked the link to the VAWA in the Wikipedia article you linked to, unless you were deliberately misrepresenting it.
posted by Astro Zombie at 1:19 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin is quite obviously a wacky choice. But the qualities she does have as a pro-life, pro-oil, creationist female are pretty attractive to the Republican base right now, who still aren't convinced McCain is the man for the job. Sure she's under a cloud of scandal, but what Republican isn't, amirite?

Here is my theory:

Rumor has it that McCain wanted to pick Lieberman. This might have won him some "change" voters, but would have done very little to appease the Republican base.

I think that the heads of the Republican party forced Palin on McCain not because she was the best candidate to run against the Democrats, but because she's attractive to the right.

I think they're punting on this election altogether and guaranteeing that whatever happens, the Republican right won't be so pissed off at being marginalized in 2008 that they won't be there in 2012.
posted by crickets at 1:20 PM on August 29, 2008


Bring out your disenfranchised Clinton supporters! [CLANG]
Bring out your disenfranchised Clinton supporters! [CLANG]
Bring out your disenfranchised Clinton supporters! [CLANG]
...
posted by jim in austin at 1:20 PM on August 29, 2008 [11 favorites]


Woah, talk about some heat in here today.

All I know is that I think she should give Kim Campbell a call and maybe back out before it's too late.
posted by GuyZero at 1:21 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Someone implies that a women can't be president due to preggers. I point this out, and you say I'm the one who's misguided?

I also point out that the Republican Party has a long history of being against career-track mommies in general, at all levels of the workforce.

Aside from it being misguided for you to suggest that it is wrong to ask reasonable questions how Palin would handle her putative and significant vice-presidential responsibilities while bringing a child to term, it is also misguided, because the question sidesteps the long, misogynistic history of the party she is affiliated with.

At the very least, we should examine the misogynistic record of her presidential running mate, John McCain, who voted against the Violence Against Women Act, skipped on voting to provide equal pay to women (and is on record for stating he would have otherwise voted against providing equal pay to women, had he showed up), voted to gut the Family and Medical Leave Act, and has voted against providing reproductive healthcare and education to young American women. This is in addition to promising to do what he can to overturn reproduction choice laws.

You are misguided.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 1:22 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


I'd just like to point out the Palin is not the governor of just any state, she is governor of Alaska. Why does is this important? Well, Alaska is bought and paid for by the oil companies. Oil money, subsidized with federal money, is what runs the state government - not income tax. A governor of Alaska doesn't have to worry about tax rates, balancing budgets or social spending - it's already dialed in.

Alaska, per capita, is one of the wealthiest states in the union.

Now compare this to other states, like, say, Ohio. Ohio is dealing with rampant unemployment, a mortgage crisis and yearly budget shortfalls funded by a declining tax-base. In Ohio, as in other states, the governor's office faces some real issues and has to show some real leadership.

Yes, she's a governor, but no, that doesn't amount to much "executive experience." If anything the Mayor of Dayton, Ohio has more executive experience - and if not, the Mayors of Chicago, New York, hell, even Cleveland do.

It's easy to dismiss criticisms of her lack of experience by claiming she's more experience than "Obama and Biden combined," but ultimately this is just empty rhetoric to back up a empty point.
posted by elwoodwiles at 1:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [38 favorites]


Astro Zombie, I really hate it when people do the "if X wins the primary, then I'm gonna vote for X's opponent, so THERE!" thing, so I recognize the frustration in your question, but... yeah. I don't particularly like to admit it, I don't think it's necessarily right (in the sense of optimizing my life), but I'm being honest because I think this is an essential component of the strategy that McCain is trying to use. Casual, off-the-cuff sexism bothers me a lot, and I would have a really hard time overcoming my gut dislike of someone who said something like that. Combine it with the general PITA it is to vote--you know, waking up early, standing in line for an hour or two, having to work late because you got in late--and I think it's possible that my personal disappointment and dislike of a particular candidate on a ticket would lead me to not vote.

I guess I'm not saying it to point out "la la la I'm a special snowflake, PANDER TO ME"--let's be honest, one vote has a vanishingly small probability of actually deciding the election, Florida in 2000 aside--but rather to explain why I think the choice of Palin was probably a really canny one on McCain's part. A lot of people on metafilter didn't really seem to grok why so many women were angry about Hillary's treatment during the primaries, and while respecting that people can have different views on whether a specific incident or phrase is sexist or not, I think it's counterproductive to pretend that the issue doesn't exist. I really, really hope that the Democratic party doesn't fall into the trap that I think McCain has set for them by having a sexist foot-in-mouth moment every couple of days between now and November. I am not, however, particularly hopeful on that point.
posted by iminurmefi at 1:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is that the one that the Supreme Court found unconstitutional in United States v. Morrison?

You mean that one that was reauthorized in 2000 and again in 2005? Signed into law by Bush? Yeah, it was that one.

The Supreme Court ruling only ruled out the civil rights remedy, not the funding.

You know, you could, like, read the Wikipedia article.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 1:24 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


So, what I want to know is, how do Joe and Sally Sixpack see a woman like her? ... Because those are the people who will give us our next administration.

And if the election were held the same day McCain made the announcement, it might just turn the election. But if the Sixpacks bother to learn anything about Sarah beyond "Woman Governor with Maverick Image!" in the next two months, not so much.
posted by wendell at 1:24 PM on August 29, 2008


Am I the only one thinking he is going for Laura Roslin and the BSG vote?

I have never been more proud of Metafilter than I was when I read this comment. Word up, well_balanced. I came here to post the same thing.

*Waves BSG Flag*
posted by Joey Michaels at 1:28 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


George W. Bush had a lot more "executive experience" than Sarah Palin in a much bigger (in every way but land mass) and complex state. What does that prove?
posted by wendell at 1:28 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


So, what I want to know is, how do Joe and Sally Sixpack see a woman like her? THAT will tell you what you need to know re the coming election. Go sit in the Waffle House this weekend, order a cup of coffee, and just listen. Because those are the people who will give us our next administration.

My guess is that they will be laughing and shaking their heads. And voting for either Obama or Barr.
posted by billysumday at 1:29 PM on August 29, 2008


A lot of people on metafilter didn't really seem to grok why so many women were angry about Hillary's treatment during the primaries, and while respecting that people can have different views on whether a specific incident or phrase is sexist or not, I think it's counterproductive to pretend that the issue doesn't exist.

Any woman who was pro-Clinton and then decides to switch to McCain over this has pretty much earned her second-class citizenship.
posted by troybob at 1:29 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


When I casually mentioned this lady as McCain's choice today (while at the gym) three out of three times I was told by each person I was speaking to that they were voting for McCain.

HOLY SHIT!

You found McCain voters in FAYETTEVILLE? Alert the news!

At 11: Rumors of Obama supporter in San Francisco.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 1:33 PM on August 29, 2008 [19 favorites]


Any woman who was pro-Clinton and then decides to switch to McCain over this has pretty much earned her second-class citizenship.

Classy.

In terms of people switching over to McCain after Hilary lost the primary, I say let them go. They aren't voting on any real issues, they aren't really involved in any process but their own, and more importantly, there aren't really that many of them.
posted by elwoodwiles at 1:34 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


You are misguided.

LOL. I think women deserve to be considered for president and VP, regardless of their potential for getting pregnant. How terribly misguided of me.
posted by jsonic at 1:35 PM on August 29, 2008


troybob, as I pointed out in my original comment, I think it's too simplistic to assume McCain is trying to win over pro-Clinton voters.

I think he's trying to get Obama's people (or hell, maybe just the media) to play the same game as in the primaries, which may have the effect of making pro-Clinton voters decide to just stay home.

(Also, that comment you made? About a woman who votes in a way you disagree with having "pretty much earned her second-class citizenship"? That's exactly the sort of shit that will create said backlash.)
posted by iminurmefi at 1:35 PM on August 29, 2008


You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama.

What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off. Is she supposed to immolate herself on a giant damn float that says I LOVE SENATOR OBAMA while singing the Star Spangled Banner? Will that do it? Or will people carp that she should have written PRESIDENT Obama so that we all know she's rlly, rlly serious this time?
posted by winna at 1:37 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


"George W. Bush had a lot more "executive experience" than Sarah Palin in a much bigger (in every way but land mass) and complex state. What does that prove?"

nothing

a necessary criteria does not mean it is a sufficient criteria

you can argue experience is not a necessary factor for competency,
but I don't think anyone is arguing it is the only factor and thus guarantees success
posted by sloe at 1:37 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I agree that most mainline Christians don't take the Bible literally, but if you don't why bother calling yourself a Christian?

The Christians that don't take the the Bible as a literal record of fact are the same Christians who believe that God must be smart enough to use metaphors.
posted by infinitywaltz at 1:38 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly?

I'm pretty well convinced that no matter what she does or how hard she works, plenty of people will be ready to blame her first if Obama loses November. And that will be really annoying. It's Obama's campaign now.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 1:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off. Is she supposed to immolate herself on a giant damn float that says I LOVE SENATOR OBAMA while singing the Star Spangled Banner? Will that do it? Or will people carp that she should have written PRESIDENT Obama so that we all know she's rlly, rlly serious this time?

Well, it would certainly be better than standing in front of the classroom, shuffling her feet and stammering "I um support Barack Obama for president ok I'm going to go home now" like she basically did this week. I think the idea is that she cares more about her own ascension to presidency than her party or purported ideals winning.
posted by cellphone at 1:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think it's too simplistic to assume McCain is trying to win over pro-Clinton voters.

I didn't speak to McCain's motives at all.

About a woman who votes in a way you disagree with...

I didn't apply this to any woman who votes in a way I disagree with. Just those who would shift their vote to McCain 'over this' (e.g., for this reason).
posted by troybob at 1:41 PM on August 29, 2008


i.e., not e.g. ugh
posted by troybob at 1:42 PM on August 29, 2008


"(Also, that comment you made? About a woman who votes in a way you disagree with having "pretty much earned her second-class citizenship"? That's exactly the sort of shit that will create said backlash.)"

A woman who votes for a candidate who wants to make her a second-class citizen because of some perceived imperfection in the character of the candidates who are working to make her a fully-equal citizen pretty fucking much deserves to get what she voted for.
posted by klangklangston at 1:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


Any woman who was pro-Clinton and then decides to switch to McCain over this has pretty much earned her second-class citizenship.

Youch! I'm suddenly feeling better about my comments in this thread.
posted by MikeMc at 1:45 PM on August 29, 2008


Um, one thing that has sort of struck me- apparently it's a big thing that she didn't terminate her last pregnancy after learning that the child would have Downs syndrome? Like, Republicans think this is a huge deal? I know at least two people who have done the same thing, people who were actually okay with abortion in general. I don't know ANYONE who, after planning to carry a pregnancy to term, changed their mind because of something like that; I'm not saying that it doesn't happen, but I've just never met anyone who has done that. I just think it's really bizarre that people think it's a crazy big deal that a person who doesn't believe in getting an abortion didn't get an abortion. Of course she didn't get an abortion, she was NEVER going to get an abortion, and the idea that people think it would be rare for this to happen generally makes me feel depressed about how people feel about people with learning disabilities in general.
posted by 235w103 at 1:46 PM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


"I'm pretty well convinced that no matter what she does or how hard she works, plenty of people will be ready to blame her first if Obama loses November."

Which is a shame, because her speech (and her husband's speech, since he's often also labeled as a submariner) was pretty fantastic and hit exactly the right notes regarding appeals to HER base, which is more important than the broader coterie of folks who already support Obama.

"Well, it would certainly be better than standing in front of the classroom, shuffling her feet and stammering "I um support Barack Obama for president ok I'm going to go home now" like she basically did this week. I think the idea is that she cares more about her own ascension to presidency than her party or purported ideals winning."

Dude, that's totally bullshit given the speeches that she's made. She was enthusiastic, she was blunt, she was pretty damn brilliant in reaching HER audience, which is a significant subset of likely-Democratic voters. She did exactly what she was supposed to and exactly what she needed to do. I was about to complain to TPS that I thought the idea of her being less-than-gracious was something that was only being kept alive by idiots on CNN, who clearly came to her speech with their frames already hung, but c'mon.
posted by klangklangston at 1:47 PM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


A woman who votes for a candidate who wants to make her a second-class citizen because of some perceived imperfection in the character of the candidates who are working to make her a fully-equal citizen pretty fucking much deserves to get what she voted for.

Either that OR your claim that the Republicans and McCain want to make women second-class citizens is just blowhard partisan rhetoric.
posted by jsonic at 1:48 PM on August 29, 2008


Well, it would certainly be better than standing in front of the classroom, shuffling her feet and stammering "I um support Barack Obama for president ok I'm going to go home now" like she basically did this week.

Oh, come on. Her speech was great.

But I do agree with the pink superhero: this is Obama's campaign now - if he loses it isn't Hilary's fault, but his own.
posted by elwoodwiles at 1:48 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


It's nice that she didn't abort her pregnancy even after finding out the fetus had Down's Syndrome. Good for her, happy happy.

You know what's even nicer? That she CHOSE not to abort. That not aborting wasn't simply mandated. Anyone who thinks that anti-abortion leanings give you the right to get all up in others' vaginas needs an attitude adjustment.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 1:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [25 favorites]


Newsweek writes that Palin “felt kind of bad she couldn’t support a woman, but she didn’t like Clinton’s ‘whining.’”*
posted by ericb at 1:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


So, what I want to know is, how do Joe and Sally Sixpack see a woman like her?

I participate in an online group which is pretty much the polar opposite of this one politically - it's a group for mothers in Charlotte, NC. There are a few of us token lib'ruls, but most of the membership is cheerily conservative, with Bible verses or quotes like "Only two forces ever agreed to die for you: Jesus Christ and the American Soldier" in their signature lines.

They're already saying that Palin is "more experienced" than Obama, because it's executive experience, or something. They like her because she's pro-life, and a mother, and didn't abort her Down Syndrome baby, and that's enough to make them ignore any possible questions about her qualifications.

I'm not feeling very optimistic about North Carolina turning blue this year.
posted by Daily Alice at 1:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Either that OR your claim that the Republicans and McCain want to make women second-class citizens is just blowhard partisan rhetoric."

Well, since it's not (based on the legislative, judicial and executive priorities and actions of the party), I'll take it that you agree with me.
posted by klangklangston at 1:50 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


jsonic: "Either that OR your claim that the Republicans and McCain want to make women second-class citizens is just blowhard partisan rhetoric."

McCain wants to remove from women a right that nobody would ever propose taking from men. Sounds like a second-class strategy to me.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 1:50 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Scandal-Plagued Ted Stevens Endorses Palin For VP, Says He’s ‘Known And Worked’ With Her ‘For Over A Decade’
posted by ericb at 1:50 PM on August 29, 2008


Palin denies global warming is man-made and is a "champion for Big Oil."
posted by ericb at 1:52 PM on August 29, 2008


I was curious who's behind VPILF. I guess I was hoping it wouldn't be an Obama supporter. Alas, no such luck.

Two clues from the top of the page:

1) masthead URL: http://web.me.com/dnksr/vpilf.com/[...]

2) "Brought to you by the same people who gave you: TheMovieSpoiler.com"


Alexa info for TheMovieSpoiler.com:
Kaiser, Dan
6111 97th Ave Ct W
Tacoma, WA
98467
US
Phone: +1 253 565 XXXX
dnksr [at] mac.com
note: web.me.com and mac.com are apple services that host user content. So dnksr@mac.com and web.me.com/dnksr/ are likely the same person.


...and a cached news article from the Tacoma News Tribune hints at Mr. Kaiser's political affiliation:
The stories behind the customized vanity license plates
IAN DEMSKY; ian.demsky@thenewstribune.com; 235-597-8872
Published: February 27th, 2008 01:00 AM
[...]
Dan Kaiser of University Place didn’t fare as well. State officials revoked his plate joking about President Bush. It read “F DUBYA.”
Congrats, Dan Kaiser, you're a dick.
posted by ryanrs at 1:55 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Well, since it's not (based on the legislative, judicial and executive priorities and actions of the party)

Based on your interpretation of their positions. Many people of both sexes don't agree with your framing.
posted by jsonic at 1:55 PM on August 29, 2008


@ijoshua:
It's pronounced "pale-in".

As in "McCain's VP choice will pale in comparison with Obama's."
posted by AngerBoy at 1:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


It seems to me that the pick is at least partly based on two misconceptions:

1. I've seen some Republicans attribute their losses in the 2006 midterms to voters being fed up with corruption, so Palin's whistleblowing was probably a plus for her. I'm not convinced that corruption was all that important an issue in 2006, and it's not a major issue this year.

2. It drastically overestimates the number of "Hillary voters." If there's really this block of 18 million pissed-off Hillary supporters, why haven't they each chipped in $2 and retired her campaign debt?

This was a smart pick today because it took attention off Obama's great speech last night, but picking an underqualified unknown (even to McCain: Palin Recently Said She Had Met McCain Only a Few Times) demonstrates poor judgment. If he wanted to pick someone else and was pressured into picking her, that demonstrates an inability to command.

The vice president should be qualified to step in as president from Day One. Biden is, Palin isn't. Picking Palin will only affect McCain's chances of winning the election; there's no indication she'll be able to help run the country. Obama's pick of Biden shows better judgement: Biden would be an asset in governing the country, and could help Obama's chances in the election.
posted by kirkaracha at 1:57 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


"Based on your interpretation of their positions. Many people of both sexes don't agree with your framing."

Many people of both sexes believe that the earth wasn't formed roughly 4.5 billion years ago. As with your example, those people are wrong. Show me someone who believes that GOP policies are better for women and I'll show you a fool or a liar.
posted by klangklangston at 1:58 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


McCain wants to remove from women a right that nobody would ever propose taking from men. Sounds like a second-class strategy to me.

Oh, so being against the killing of unborn life means McCain is anti-women. I guess that makes those who support the killing of unborn life anti-everybody.
posted by jsonic at 1:59 PM on August 29, 2008


Based on your interpretation of their positions

Based more on roll calls for Senate legislation, and actual policy, you mean.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 1:59 PM on August 29, 2008


Scandal-Plagued Ted Stevens Endorses Palin For VP

Oooohhhh, that's gotta hurt. Stevens probably hates her and is trying to take her down with him.
posted by MikeMc at 1:59 PM on August 29, 2008


Her primary four qualities, from McCain's perspective: 1) she's anti-choice/pro-life; 2) she's a she; 3) there isn't any video footage of her dissing McCain, as there is for just about every other person in this country that anyone's ever heard of; and 4) she's kinda hawt (although he won't admit this one, of course).

The big downside is that she completely eviscerates McCain's "experience is important" message, which is really the only message he had that was working at all among voters who aren't already pinned to the Republican Party because of social issues like keeping gays from getting married and keeping women from access to safe abortions.

I'm not objective here, but that one big downside seems to me to outweigh all the positives combined, because that leaves McCain with a whole lotta nothing to work with.
posted by jamstigator at 2:01 PM on August 29, 2008


Based on your interpretation of their positions. Many people of both sexes don't agree with your framing

Voted against a law protecting women from violence. Voted against making certain women got equal pay. Has consistently voted antichoice.

I'm sorry, this is not merely an issue of framing. This sort of voting really does relegate someone to a second-class status. Not everything is just a matter of opinion.
posted by Astro Zombie at 2:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Maria Bartiromo Talks With Sarah Palin
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 2:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Oh, so being against the killing of unborn life means McCain is anti-women.

McCain voting against the Violence Against Women Act is anti-women. McCain voting against equal pay for women is anti-women. McCain voting against family leave is anti-women. McCain voting against reproductive healthcare and education is anti-women.

McCain being against reproductive choice is just the nail in the coffin.

Your continued, conscious decision to ignore McCain's voting record on all of these issues as they concern women is also anti-women.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 2:03 PM on August 29, 2008 [43 favorites]


For the record, Fayetteville is filled with Democrats.
posted by konolia at 2:03 PM on August 29, 2008


Who cares if she's a woman, who cares if she's experienced. That's not what the election is about. If the Dems spend all their time trying to show why she's not a good VP pick, they're focusing on the wrong things. Obama's speech last night was about moving forward, and not letting these little things distract us. There are much bigger issues then anything represented in the Palin pick.
posted by cell divide at 2:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


jsonic, you move those goalposts just 10% faster and I'm pretty sure you'll start travelling in time.
posted by Shepherd at 2:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


"I'm sorry, this is not merely an issue of framing. This sort of voting really does relegate someone to a second-class status. Not everything is just a matter of opinion."

If I recall correctly, jsonic's also the guy who freaked out and got all belligerent because some woman said that she'd kick a guy in the balls if he asked to grope her breasts, so jsonic might not have the best grasp of gender equality.
posted by klangklangston at 2:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


Oh, so being against the killing of unborn life means McCain is anti-women.

Yes.
posted by Astro Zombie at 2:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


From this, just posted: Maria Bartiromo Talks With Sarah Palin:

"Q: How important is drilling in Alaska to ease the burden of high oil prices on Americans?

A: Not only to ease the high prices of energy in America but also for national security reasons. Drilling in Alaska is going to be a matter of life and death. Up here in Alaska, we're bursting with billions of barrels of oil that are warehoused underground. We have to pump [this oil] and feed our hungry markets instead of relying on the foreign sources of energy. "

LOL.
posted by Perplexity at 2:06 PM on August 29, 2008


cell divide for the win.

I'm outta here.
posted by elwoodwiles at 2:10 PM on August 29, 2008


jamstigator: The big downside is that she completely eviscerates McCain's 'experience is important' message,

Totally. One of McCain's assertions was that someone who hasn't been to Iraq, and been there recently, can have no grasp of the proper way to handle the situation there. Well looky who that's applying to now.

I'm not objective here, but that one big downside seems to me to outweigh all the positives combined,

Exact-a-mundo, I agree with you 100%. As an Obama supporter I am very pleased with McCain's choice.
posted by XMLicious at 2:11 PM on August 29, 2008


Oooohhhh, that's gotta hurt. Stevens probably hates her and is trying to take her down with him.

"In 2006, Sen. Ted Stevens endorsed Palin.

Last month, after Stevens was indicted, Palin refused to call for his resignation, saying that he had 'dedicated his life to the betterment of the state.' She had previously called for another indicted lawmaker to resign."*

And she touts herself as a reformer and corruption fighter.
posted by ericb at 2:11 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Incidentally, I'd love to see a woman elected to either the prez or VP office. (I'm a white male.) When I was in the Army and overseas, I'd get my local ballots. This was before the internet though, so I knew none of the people on the ballots or what they stood for, nothing. Yet I did not want my vote to not count for *anything*, so I looked for all the Democrat females and voted for all of them, wherever there was one. Where there was no woman running, I picked the Democrat. So I blindly voted Democrat-but-weighted-toward-women, so that at least my vote would have some purpose behind it, addressing the one inequality in our society that I could identify solely based on the names of the candidates.

Since that young age, I've always wanted to see a woman elected to our highest offices. But it has to be the right woman, at least for me. Just any woman won't do, because it'll be a historic precedent when it happens, and you don't want the first woman to accomplish the feat to make it harder for the women of the future by being anything less than competent. This particular woman isn't the one. I was fine with Hillary, would in fact have preferred her to Obama, but life goes on, she was the loser, and I'm still a Democrat, so Obama it is.

Maybe this is McCain's way of saying, 'If you vote for two *dudes* then you're a fag, so vote for me and the hot chick and no one will think that." Sadly, that might even work in some parts of rural Bubbaville.
posted by jamstigator at 2:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Voted against a law protecting women from violence.

Did he possibly think there are already laws against abusing people? Remember, just because a bill has a positive sounding name, like the "Patriot Act", does not make voting against it wrong.

McCain voting against equal pay for women is anti-women

Or maybe he thinks it's not a politician's job to determine wages through law.

McCain voting against family leave is anti-women

Or maybe he thinks it's not a politican's job to specify employment contracts between an individual and a company.

McCain being against reproductive choice is just the nail in the coffin

Or maybe he wants to stop people from killing unborn life.
posted by jsonic at 2:14 PM on August 29, 2008


What is McCain Thinking? One Alaskan’s Perspective. (Includes a panoramic photo of downtown Wasilla, Alaska.)
posted by kirkaracha at 2:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


I think sour cream is clairivoyant.

What will your role be at the upcoming convention?
I'm doing a pro-life speech. Four months ago, my fifth child was born with Down syndrome…so I value innocent life. It took many months for me to get my arms around the idea of, first, having a fifth child at my age, but also knowing that my child would have an extra chromosome. But I prayed the whole time, "God, just prepare me, prepare my heart and prepare my family." And talk about confirmation of that prayer, I mean, Trig is just—he is to me—absolutely perfect. And everybody's in love with him, and he's the sweetest little baby in the world.

posted by designbot at 2:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"Maybe this is McCain's way of saying, 'If you vote for two *dudes* then you're a fag, so vote for me and the hot chick and no one will think that.""

If I hadn't blown my irony vote in 2000, I would vote for McCain with that slogan. Even better if he phrased it "Vote 4 2 dudez=UR fag."

I can just see Wolf Blitzer seriously contemplating whether that would win him the 4chan vote.
posted by klangklangston at 2:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


jsonic: "Oh, so being against the killing of unborn life means McCain is anti-women. I guess that makes those who support the killing of unborn life anti-everybody."

I guess you're just being a dick, right? Because that's not what I wrote. What I said was that if anyone proposed a law that forced men to be a life-support system against their will, they'd be laughed at.

But, yes. Wanting the US Constitution to be amended to specifically take away women's rights based on the condition of their uterus IS anti-woman, REGARDLESS of the 'flaw' that you think needs correcting.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 2:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


This could all be very horrible.
posted by Artw at 2:16 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Interpret them as you will, jsonic; nonetheless, those votes had a cumulative effect of rekegating women to a second-class position in society. I don't care what logic goes into making decisions that are bad for people. They're still decisions that are bad for people.
posted by Astro Zombie at 2:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Jsonic: Lot of maybes there, and the problem is that all of those things could be true and it would still add up to a net effect of making women second-class citizens. Frankly, I don't care if he votes against those bills because his pagan idol Yojo tells him to—it still adds up to being against the interests of women.
posted by klangklangston at 2:18 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


relegating
posted by Astro Zombie at 2:18 PM on August 29, 2008


This choice makes me think a couple of things:

-- McCain has given up on the "experience" attacks - probably his polling shows it was getting traction, probably also he waited to see Bill Clinton's strong support of Obama and also was influenced by the choice of Biden. In this sense, the choice is a huge win for Obama because it means they forced a sub-optimal choice onto McCain, a choice that seems entirely about "solidifying the base", almost none of whom would vote meaning I think McCain will now try to move to the centre which will expose him mightily form both sides - he loses points for judgment from some, will lose policy support from others, and may only make marginal gains in the centre.

-- The Republicans fear Obama's rhetorical skills such that they needed a nuclear bomb of publicity to try to nullify his acceptance speech which even had hard core Republican commentators wetting their pants, and quite likely would have been the most attention many voters & the media would have paid to Obama until the debates. So -- a short term choice designed for short term tactica reasons, not strategic ones within the context of the election as a whole, and one that reveals a deep, abiding Republican fear of Obama's ability to inspire.
posted by Rumple at 2:19 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


What is McCain Thinking? One Alaskan’s Perspective.

And prominent in that photo of downtown Wasilla is the 'Mugshot Saloon.' How very appropriate.
posted by ericb at 2:19 PM on August 29, 2008


If I recall correctly, jsonic's also the guy who freaked out and got all belligerent because some woman said that she'd kick a guy in the balls if he asked to grope her breasts, so jsonic might not have the best grasp of gender equality.

LOL. You think violence is ok if someone offends you. But only if you're a girl. Wonderful 'gender equality' you support there.
posted by jsonic at 2:20 PM on August 29, 2008


Arguably, the greatest tragedy of Palin's fifth child is that name she saddled the poor guy with. Like, he's already got enough to deal with—he doesn't need people assuming that his parents are yuppie assholes too.
posted by klangklangston at 2:20 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I can't believe it took hundreds of comments for someone (235w103 and Dipsomaniac) to question the idea of Palin's choice to have her youngest son as some sort of paragon of her militant anti-choice ideals. It's completely irrelevant to questions of reproductive rights. She's one person, whose right it was to choose, and she made her choice, and anything beyond that is none of our business. And that's how choice works.

I mean, I see how it would matter to pro-life voters who get wrapped up in the issue emotionally and it warms their little hearts. But it doesn't really mean anything, legally. Like I've said here before, pro-life women have babies sometimes and also abortions sometimes. So do pro-choice women. It's got nothing to do with other women's pregnancies.

I've been perplexed about this all day, and I've been trying to find something on the internet that answers my totally honest question: Has Sarah Palin ever done anything pro-life/anti-choice? Everywhere I've looked has shown concrete examples of her position on gay rights, energy, the environment, etc.--you know, things like signing and vetoing laws, rescinding appointments, selling jets, and so on. On abortion, it's "she is pro-life" and nothing more. So far, it looks like her pro-life creds are:

1. Saying she's pro-life; other people saying she's pro-life.
2. Being a member of FFL.
3. Bearing children.

Those aren't really executive actions. It's not that I doubt that she's anti-choice. I'm sure she is; it's not like I've seen evidence to the contrary. But I can't help feel like I'm missing something. Am I? Seriously, I want to know.
posted by lampoil at 2:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I'm thinking they going to make the race ENTIRELY about abortion. They have nothing else, bar experience (busted) and Obama being a sekret muslim (never overtly stated, getting a bit tired).

And if they win they will be in a position to do something about it.

I think they have a pretty good shot.
posted by Artw at 2:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I guess that makes those who support the killing of unborn life anti-everybody.

Also, who supports the "killing" of "unborn life"? Removing your scientifically unsound terms here, people who are pro-choice aren't marching around crowing about how friggin' awesome abortions are. I'd suggest reading up on what pro-choice means before digging an even deeper hole.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 2:25 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off. Is she supposed to immolate herself on a giant damn float that says I LOVE SENATOR OBAMA while singing the Star Spangled Banner? Will that do it? Or will people carp that she should have written PRESIDENT Obama so that we all know she's rlly, rlly serious this time?

This is not an issue of "Clinton should be sucking up to her new lord and master Obama." If she cares about her party at all, it makes sense for her to address her voters who might now abandon her party and her ideals.
posted by showbiz_liz at 2:25 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


**To all those who say "talking about her derisively for being in a beauty pagent isn't sexist!!", I'd urge you to read onlyconnect's comment, which hits the nail on the head. You don't have to agree with her analysis, but if you weren't someone who thought that Hillary faced a lot of sexist bullshit in the primaries, you're not really the target of this anyway.

I did read it, I do think Hillary faced a lot of sexist bullshit in the primaries, and I still disprove strongly of her for being in a beauty pageant.

Beauty pageants are the antithesis of everything I stand for as a feminist, and I do. not. want. people who participate in their bullshit to represent me as a woman, and as a human being.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 2:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


From the Mudflats ("Tiptoeing Through the Muck of Alaskan Politics") blog (to which kirkaracha links):
“Before her meteoric rise to political success as governor, just two short years ago Sarah Palin was the mayor of Wasilla. I had a good chuckle at MSN.com’s claim that she had been the mayor of ‘Wasilla City’. It is not a city. Just Wasilla. Wasilla is the heart of the Alaska ‘Bible belt’ and Sarah was raised amongst the tribe that believes creationism should be taught in our public schools, homosexuality is a sin, and life begins at conception. She’s a gun-toting, hang ‘em high conservative. Remember…this is where her approval ratings come from. There is no doubt that McCain again is making a strategic choice to appeal to a particular demographic - fundamentalist right-wing gun-owning Christians. And Republican bloggers are already gushing about how she has ‘more executive experience’ than Obama does! Above is a picture of lovely downtown Wasilla, for those of you unfamiliar with the area. Behind the Mug-Shot Saloon (the first bar I visited when I moved to Alaska long ago) is a little strip mall. There are street signs in Wasilla with bullet holes in them. Wasilla has a population of about 5500 people, and 1979 occupied housing units. This is where your potential Vice President was two short years ago. Can you imagine her negotiating a nuclear non-proliferation treaty? Discussing foreign policy? Understanding non-Alaskan issues? Frankly, I don’t even know if she’s ever been out of the country. She may ‘get’ Alaska, but there are only a half a million people here. Don’t get me wrong….I love Alaska with all my heart. I’m just saying.”
posted by ericb at 2:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


"relegating"

You were first because you misspelled!

"LOL. You think violence is ok if someone offends you. But only if you're a girl. Wonderful 'gender equality' you support there."

Yeah, y'know how your first comment in that thread was so out-of-line that it got deleted, and how you spent, like, 30 more comments getting all apoplectic without understanding anything of the underlying issue? It makes your defender-of-women act here seem pretty hollow.
posted by klangklangston at 2:29 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


plenty of people will be ready to blame her first if Obama loses November. And that will be really annoying. It's Obama's campaign now.

why, of course. Hillary only wrote the script for the GOP's strategy against Obama, covered him in racist filth ("hardworking Americans, white Americans") allowing the McCain camp to step back and simply watch, letting her test the limits of you can and can not say against a black candidate (see Ferraro's statement, Bill's outburst) and take the heat for it. she wrote the plan, she's a star in the GOP's ads, she got herself an ovation earlier today during Palin's speech, but you're right, you're not running. there will be time to figure out who lost this thing that was almost impossible to lose given Bush's numbers and Congressional races polls and McCain's own long list of problems. there will be time, about three years exactly.

then, Sen. Clinton will be more than welcome to run again in the Democratic primaries in 2012 and try to unseat McCain/Palin. she's not exactly a shoo-in for the 2012 nomination either, because some of the bad mojo from 2008 may indeed get stuck on her, too, but we'll see. me, I'd advise the Democrats to run a non-liberal guy from the South next time, though.


"Either that OR your claim that the Republicans and McCain want to make women second-class citizens is just blowhard partisan rhetoric."


no, that's the gays -- they're the ones who thanks to the GOP can't marry like straight people can, because their love is filthy and immoral and abnormal and can not be sanctioned by the government. women, in the GOP's own platform, are the ones who can't decide what happens once they get pregnant -- Antonin Scalia decides for them.
posted by matteo at 2:31 PM on August 29, 2008 [16 favorites]


And matteo nails it.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 2:34 PM on August 29, 2008


A woman who votes for a candidate who wants to make her a second-class citizen because of some perceived imperfection in the character of the candidates who are working to make her a fully-equal citizen pretty fucking much deserves to get what she voted for.

Well, I guess by your reasoning, women are pretty much just fucked either way, then, since my original hypothetical was about not voting for someone who made a comment implying that women weren't suitable for holding the office of the Presidency solely by virtue of the fact that they have functioning reproductive organs--which, hello, I'd call a pretty strong statement about women being second-class citizens. I'm not talking about some random, unimportant "inperfection" in the character of the candidates like being a furry; I'm speaking specifically about what might happen if one of them starts spewing out sexist crap as talking points against Palin. (I guess you could believe that one's policies and one's beliefs are totally separate, but I have a hard time buying that.)

If you're making the argument that women deserve to be second-class citizens because they fail to vote for the candidate who is less bad on the issue (and honestly, anyone who thinks that Biden is some sort of paragon of pro-choice pro-woman policies has not investigated his record closely enough--he's worlds better than McCain, but certainly has some bad positions on reproductive rights, and VAWA doesn't just erase that), that's a different argument. I tend to believe that no woman "deserves" to be a second-class citizen, but I'm also one of the killjoys who hates rape jokes about Ann Coulter, so what the hell do I know.
posted by iminurmefi at 2:35 PM on August 29, 2008


Y'know, I realize it's silly, but by now I just want the Dems to win so that matteo will shut up for ten minutes (before attacking Obama for not being socialist enough). How's Berlusconi treatin' you?
posted by klangklangston at 2:37 PM on August 29, 2008


600th.
posted by Zambrano at 2:37 PM on August 29, 2008


Remember, Obama is a poker player - and I think he just put McCain all-in on a weak flop. Could pay, but it's a bad bet.
posted by nicwolff at 2:39 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


If someone actively sells out not only their rights, but the rights of others, they don't necessarily deserve the bad things that will happen. But they shouldn't expect the rest of us to be throwing them a freaking pity party anytime soon, either.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 2:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


"All eyes turned to the masked rider, who then removed the helmet and *gasp* revealed herself to be a woman, with long hair spilling down about her shoulders."

Just shows your political naivety. You've never heard of "helmet head", have you.
posted by i_am_joe's_spleen at 2:43 PM on August 29, 2008


The repugnant VPILF site has posts dating back to last week, which is interesting (is it a new domain with back dated posts?).

I think this selection is also de facto acknowledgment that the PUMAs are a republican trojan horse with Palin meant to hoover up their support.
posted by Rumple at 2:44 PM on August 29, 2008


"(I guess you could believe that one's policies and one's beliefs are totally separate, but I have a hard time buying that.)"

In some sense, yes. Like I said upthread, it doesn't matter why McCain votes against the interests of women, just that he does. They're not totally separate, but I care much more about the policies than the beliefs that inform them. Given the choice between "says sexist crap+votes for women's rights" and "says sexist crap+votes against women's rights," I'd think the choice would still be clear, that the interest of a woman would be best served by someone who says sexist crap but votes in their interest. The ideal would be someone who doesn't say sexist crap and also votes in women's interests, but given the choice between two less-than-ideal candidates, an adult that votes against her interests does deserve to have a government that works against her interests.
posted by klangklangston at 2:44 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


You can see an inversion of that when you think about the rural poor—Republicans claim to work in their interest and say the right things, but vote against programs that would help them. Rural poor who vote for Republicans get what they deserve, broadly stated. The folks that get screwed are the ones who voted against those folks and lost.
posted by klangklangston at 2:46 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Go sit in the Waffle House this weekend, order a cup of coffee, and just listen. Because those are the people who will give us our next administration.

You heard it here first, folks. The programmers at Premier(Diebold) love Waffle House.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 2:46 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


But I also have very little but contempt for undecided voters, so I recognize that Dean won't be putting me on the phone banks anytime soon.
posted by klangklangston at 2:47 PM on August 29, 2008


Republican bloggers are already gushing about how she has ‘more executive experience’ than Obama does!

Wouldn't that mean she has more "executive experience" than McCain as well? Seems like a bad point to focus on.
posted by MikeMc at 2:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Artw nailed it. This announcement is, above all, a signal that McCain's campaign is going to make abortion the signature wedge issue from here on out. Sarah Palin's speech at the convention is going to have the pro-life church-going moms in tears.

"Sarah Palin thinks that babies are a precious gift from God, while Barack Obama wants to abort them alive and toss them in soiled utility baskets." I guarantee the e-mails are being frantically forwarded as we speak.
posted by designbot at 2:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


For the record, Fayetteville is filled with Democrats.

I don't doubt it. Democrats that keep voting for Republicans for President, like you find all over the south.

I mean, look. Cumberland County went just slightly for Bush in 04... but Cumberland County is also about 40% black.

If you really want I can try to dig up GIS data for election precincts in Cumberland County and cross-reference them with Census demographics and then with votes by precinct, but come on. White people in Cumberland County were almost certainly voting for Bush by three to one or more.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 2:52 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


FIRST!


oh, wait...damn.
posted by Muddler at 2:53 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


>> You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama.

> What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off.

I think you're looking at it bass ackwards: suddenly, the ante's been raised for Sen. Clinton. It's an opportunity, rather than an onerous burden -- especially if she still has her sights set on 2012/2016, governorship, whatever. The media, freshly consumed with the "what will Hillary's supporters do?" hype all over again, will be hanging on Sen. Clinton's every word on the stump now with Palin on the scene. Sen. Clinton is now, in every way, the Anti-Palin: and so on. Even without getting into the sexist notion of the younger woman being handed her position due to her attractiveness (and I scoff at any commentator who suggests with a straight face that Palin's resume and qualifications were more instrumental to her selection than the demographic appeal stemming largely from her age, gender, and photogenic appearance): Palin provides an absolute gold mine of contrasts for Clinton and her supporters, the proverbial silver lining in this whole campaign season. Regardless of which future position Sen. Clinton is angling for at this point (even if she hasn't decided), her speeches and attacks against the McCain/Palin ticket will suddenly matter in a whole new way, she can make those hits nobody else can without being labeled a bully or a sexist, and best of all she no longer has to play defense at all (which has always been the worst Clinton liability) -- it's all freebie opportunities to grow her political stature and increase her exposure in the media spotlight without any of the fratricidal concerns that she kept bumping into during the primaries. I can't imagine a better opportunity for her at this point to really flex her political muscles.

Just like that, the Obama/Biden campaign has suddenly become relevant again for Sen. Clinton. The press is going to be waiting to hear everything she has to say, and she's savvy enough to know it. I fully expect her to be working extra hard to elect Obama now -- because win or lose, she's going to reap those rewards. Other than Obama and Biden themselves, at this point no other Democrat stands to gain so much from this election.

Palin recycled Sen. Clinton's "18 million cracks" phrase in her speech today -- there's no way Sen. Clinton's going to let Palin try to co-opt her legacy from the primaries so easily like that. No way, no how, and Sen. Clinton's supporters know how this saying ends.
posted by DaShiv at 2:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [73 favorites]


I for one fully support the killing of unborn life. For the same reason I support the killing of undead zombies and vampires. Because the whole concept is an oxymoron based on fantasy and I am generally Reality-Based.
posted by wendell at 2:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [11 favorites]


Soiled utility baskets. The very worst kind.
posted by fleetmouse at 2:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


God, I hope that Clinton comes out swinging like that. I think, freed of some of the dumber elements from her campaign staff and the necessities of infrastructure, she could be an awesome hammer of rhetorical justice.
posted by klangklangston at 2:59 PM on August 29, 2008


ROU_Xenophobe, don't bother. My husband probably knows the stats by heart.

But also remember these folks here vote for the person, not the party, and I also know Obama had a big turnout when he was here.

Also remember that McCain is considered as fairly liberal by folks here, and that Obama is, well, Obama. The guy is incredibly charismatic. If it weren't for the topic of abortion I'd be tempted to drink the kool-aid.
posted by konolia at 3:02 PM on August 29, 2008


The ideal would be someone who doesn't say sexist crap and also votes in women's interests, but given the choice between two less-than-ideal candidates, an adult that votes against her interests does deserve to have a government that works against her interests.

There's a part of me that just really chokes on the "deserving it" rhetoric, but that's probably a holdover from my hate of how it's used against women in other situations. Setting aside my knee-jerk reaction to that particular phrasing, I don't disagree with you at all that it's in women's best interest to vote Obama/Biden. I don't think anyone who really calls themselves pro-womens-rights would disagree with that point. (Although I have to point out that I think in some ways it's easier to be a guy--no offense klang--and say, "Well of course you should vote Dem, no matter what offensive thing they say," because I don't think it really hits you in the gut the same way it does for some women. It's not the same sort of personal insult.)

I'm trying to draw a distinction, I guess, between what is rationally in people's best interest and how they are likely to act in that situation, and how the Democratic ticket should take that into account when deciding on their strategy for attacking McCain/Palin. I think a lot of Obama supporters are really misguided with the belief that because McCain is worse than Obama on women's rights, Palin doesn't represent some threat electorally. He doesn't have to convince women to vote for him, just to stay home--it's like the Nader argument of, well, both parties are so bad it's pointless to vote for either. In a close state, low turnout among women, who are much more likely to support Democrats, could be a deciding factor in tipping the state red. There are things that Obama and Biden can do to counteract this--number 1 being aware of it and not falling into the trap of (inadvertently) insulting women while trying to tear down Palin, and number 2 speaking out against anything like that when it comes up in the media or through their surrogates/supporters.
posted by iminurmefi at 3:03 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I can just see Wolf Blitzer seriously contemplating whether that would win him the 4chan vote

Needs more Desu.
posted by MikeMc at 3:03 PM on August 29, 2008


they will have a vote, someone will win, yet again i will realise that mefites are all rabid democrats and not a representative cross setion of us society - so i wont get my hopes up.
posted by sgt.serenity at 3:04 PM on August 29, 2008


I just think it's really bizarre that people think it's a crazy big deal that a person who doesn't believe in getting an abortion didn't get an abortion. Of course she didn't get an abortion, she was NEVER going to get an abortion

Depends on how she found out.

I've known women who would tell you that there's no reason to get specifically screened for Downs unless you're at least thinking of abortion.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 3:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


GuyZero, Kim Campbell had 15 kinds of class and way more relevant experience than this Palin person.

Man, US politics has gotten so skewed to the right that I'm wistfully looking at failed Conservative Canadian pols....
posted by QIbHom at 3:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


What a monumentally disastrous mistake by McCain. All of his gaffes over the past few months suggest to me a deteriorating mental acuity on his part. This choice is more evidence of impaired judgement. I'm really looking forward to the debates where networks such as CBS will not be able to excise his errors, or to hide Palin's painful inexperience.
posted by Neiltupper at 3:08 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


You missed the news, or didn't pay attention. "Experience" just became utterly irrelevant, and a mcCain victory just became the most likely outcome.
posted by Artw at 3:10 PM on August 29, 2008


Soiled utility baskets. The very worst kind.

I wish I was exaggerating.

(To be perfectly clear, the source of these claims is a whack job, and the state's investigation turned up no evidence that what she alleges actually happened, and even if it did, it would have already been illegal under state law, making the bill Obama voted against completely irrelevant.)
posted by designbot at 3:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Oh, I know, konolia.

But... it's not like running into conservative people, who would hold their nose and vote for McCain or just not vote, is hard to do in the rural south wedged between Pope and Bragg. That's all.

I'm sure that Palin will get some conservative evangelicals to the polls who weren't going to show up otherwise.

OTOH, I can't help but wonder what her being Catholic, and especially obviously Catholic with her parade of children, will have on the more fundamentalist voters. A papist a heartbeat away? When she wants prayer in school... is it to Christ or to Mary? Though by this point I'd bet the fraction who thinks Catholics aren't really Christian is pretty small.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 3:14 PM on August 29, 2008


and I scoff at any commentator who suggests with a straight face that Palin's resume and qualifications were more instrumental to her selection than the demographic appeal stemming largely from her age, gender, and photogenic appearance

She's pro-life, which fills in a big hole for McCain supporters. She is not a Washington insider. She's the most popular governor in the United States, with an approval rating in the 90 percent range. She has a reputation as a reformer -- she vetoed 13% of the state's proposed budget for capital projects and showed herself as someone capable of making tough decisions. She resigned from the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission after complaining about ethical violations from another commissioner, and was villified for a while and then became a hero for it. (Again, another tough decision.)

Not a single one of these qualities or accomplishments are dependant on her age, gender, or photogenic appearance, but perhaps they are all things that you think it is appropriate to scoff at. But go ahead and continue to believe that McCain picked her because she is a pretty, pretty princess. Because Democrats have never underestimated Republicans before -- or the willingness of middle america to elect the folks who are not necessarily the smartest or went to the best schools, but seem to them like the most decent people. Scoff away. You're still not getting it.
posted by onlyconnect at 3:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


>> You know, I think there's also a very good case to be made that this may motivate Hillary Clinton to work even harder to elect Barack Obama.

> What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off.



And what the fuck makes you think that saying someone "may (be) motivate(d)" is the same as saying that she "MUST WORK HARDER"? Hillary can choose to do whatever she wants. However, I very much doubt she'll choose to sit this one out, for all the reasons DaShiv pointed out above.
posted by oneirodynia at 3:17 PM on August 29, 2008


All of his gaffes over the past few months suggest to me a deteriorating mental acuity on his part.

Do the candidates get to dictate these things? I assumed the party basically told them what to do, (but that the candidate probably got veto power if it was something they couldn't tolerate).
posted by small_ruminant at 3:21 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


BEST THREAD EVAH!
posted by Slothrup at 3:22 PM on August 29, 2008


Kim Campbell had 15 kinds of class and way more relevant experience than this Palin person.

Sure. Absolutely. But her career was destroyed by crashing onto the rocks during the backlash from Mulroney.

He's the worst case for Palin: McCain wins. McCain does a bunch of stuff all goes sour (like Mulroney at the end). Then he has a heart attack or something (election time finally came around for the Conservatives, now Campbell is at the helm). And who pays the price for the public's dislike of McCain (Mulroney)? That's right: the woman.

Seriously, for a (relatively) young politician, getting elected as VP could be the best, last move of Palin's political career. Campbell won the battle (becoming the first woman PM) but lost the war (was she the shortest-serving PM ever?). Palin could en up the exact same way. if I were her I would have stayed in Alaska and looked forward to a long series of oil company "loans" and "gifts" like ol' Ted.
posted by GuyZero at 3:22 PM on August 29, 2008


"I'm trying to draw a distinction, I guess, between what is rationally in people's best interest and how they are likely to act in that situation, and how the Democratic ticket should take that into account when deciding on their strategy for attacking McCain/Palin. "

I think that's a fair distinction, and I will agree that it's necessary to win irrational voters in order to win the presidency. I might even go so far as to say that morons are the biggest single demographic in America, and that the moron vote is often what decides the outcome of the presidential race.
posted by klangklangston at 3:27 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


Huh. Wikipedia says she cancelled the "bridge to nowhere" after the federal funds were withdrawn and she declined to cough up the several hundred million dollar difference out of state funds. I keep hearing how she cancelled it, but that titbit sure casts it in a different light.
posted by Rumple at 3:32 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


The repugnant VPILF site has posts dating back to last week, which is interesting (is it a new domain with back dated posts?).

It looks like Dan Kaiser registered the domain on August 4 2008. Back in 1992 he ran as a Dem in the Washington state senate primary, district 28. So he's probably not a Republican insider.

All the HTML and photos from the earlier posts have a modification date of August 29 2008, as do the reader comments. I think the dates on the posts are the publication dates of the linked news articles.

The Aug 4 domain registration date is pretty curious though.
posted by ryanrs at 3:33 PM on August 29, 2008


Because Democrats have never underestimated Republicans before -- or the willingness of middle america to elect the folks who are not necessarily the smartest or went to the best schools, but seem to them like the most decent people. Scoff away. You're still not getting it.

McCain is the son and grandson of two four-star admirals. Obama was abandoned by his father and raised by a mother who had to use food stamps to get by. Bush was the son of a President of the United States and the grandson of a U.S. Senator and went to Yale and Harvard Business School. Bill Clinton was similarly abandoned by his father. It really is time to drop the whole 'Democrats are elitists' trope and acknowledge that the facts show otherwise.

This isn't 1988 or even 2004. This is 2008 and so much has changed and the GOP brand is so discredited that it is highly unlikely that "middle America" will save McCain from his rightful fate as a losing presidential candidate.
posted by Ironmouth at 3:35 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


I never heard Obama say he was considering Clinton for vice president

Well, in May, Obama said she would be on anyone's short list of vice presidential candidates. But, indeed, that seems likely to have been more about flouting his lead than about his short list, given her absence when names were actually floated.

For what it's worth, I'm a male Democrat, and think Clinton faced a lot of disgusting sexism (and wish, particularly, that Chris Matthews were out of a job.)
posted by Zed_Lopez at 3:36 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Because the whole concept is an oxymoron based on fantasy and I am generally Reality-Based.

Oh, so now abortion doesn't kill a life? I wonder why people have abortions in the first place then? Oh, that's right, it's because if they didn't have the abortion, a human life would pop-out of them a few months later.

A woman's right to her own body is a very compelling argument in the abortion debate. And using that argument, I understand why people have a different position on this issue than me. But to try and claim that abortion doesn't end a developing baby's life runs counter to the ENTIRE reason people have abortions in the first place.
posted by jsonic at 3:37 PM on August 29, 2008


Campbell has that cushy think tank job in Spain still, right? I take your point, but she didn't exactly land hard.

While I'm fantasizing about Canadian female pols in US politics, maybe we could take Carolyn Parrish off your hands?
posted by QIbHom at 3:39 PM on August 29, 2008


Oh, so now abortion doesn't kill a life? I wonder why people have abortions in the first place then? Oh, that's right, it's because if they didn't have the abortion, a human life would pop-out of them a few months later.

And if they had a miscarriage, it wouldn't. Don't try to reduce the complexity of human reproduction down to a simmple binary of "is it life/isn't it?" It's awesomely complex and nobody knows for certain the moment when a mass of cells becomes something other than a mass of cells, which is why, when it comes time to make that decision, we leave it in the hands of the person we know to be affected by it, the women who has the mass of cells growing inside her.
posted by Astro Zombie at 3:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [14 favorites]


Women have abortions when they have 'stupid sex' with men who won't use condoms.
posted by Surfurrus at 3:44 PM on August 29, 2008


Okay, it's just turned into crazy talk down here.
posted by Astro Zombie at 3:46 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]



OTOH, I can't help but wonder what her being Catholic
My understanding, for what it's worth, is that she is of the Pentecostal Assemblies of God persuasion.
posted by dawson at 3:48 PM on August 29, 2008


McCain is the son and grandson of two four-star admirals. Obama was abandoned by his father and raised by a mother who had to use food stamps to get by. Bush was the son of a President of the United States and the grandson of a U.S. Senator and went to Yale and Harvard Business School. Bill Clinton was similarly abandoned by his father. It really is time to drop the whole 'Democrats are elitists' trope and acknowledge that the facts show otherwise.

Were we watching the same campaign between Bush and Gore? Bush the Younger was the guy that everybody wanted to have a beer with, whereas Gore was the guy that talked like a robot in his speeches and folks thought was too much of a policy wonk, and not relatable to the average Joe. Likewise, Clinton was the guy who could talk to anybody, who had a way of making you feel like you were the only person in the room when he talked to you, whereas Bush the Elder was the guy who was so out of touch with middle america that he didn't know what a scanner in a grocery store was.

Obama's mom may have used food stamps, but as Obama himself said last night, he was able to go to the finest schools in the nation despite that. Surely you have heard the talk from naysayers that he has a messiah complex and is an elitist and is a "celebrity" candidate. McCain went to a military school (where he did badly) and went to war and spent half a decade in a prison camp and gets angry at people when he thinks they are rude to him.

So, in short, no, I don't think it's time to drop the trope that some people pick their presidential choice on the basis of who'd they'd rather have a beer with.
posted by onlyconnect at 3:48 PM on August 29, 2008


I'd rather have a beer with Obama.
posted by Astro Zombie at 3:50 PM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


What the fuck is Hillary Clinton supposed to do at this point, exactly? I'm tired of the HILLARY MUST WORK HARDER TO ELECT OBAMA idiocy, online and off.

Stump continuously in Ohio. Really, she has everything to gain by going around just like she was on the ticket about how important Pres. Obama will be to accomplishing her goals for America. She and Obama will vote together 90% of the time. If she delivers from the Senate a healthcare bill with mandates, Obama will probably have to sign it. If she delivers that same bill to McCain he will laugh and laugh and veto. Maybe mention how she doesn't really want VP, but a cabinet position might be nice.
posted by a robot made out of meat at 3:50 PM on August 29, 2008


While I'm fantasizing about Canadian female pols in US politics, maybe we could take Carolyn Parrish off your hands?

Please.
posted by mazola at 3:51 PM on August 29, 2008


I'm curious as to where on the list Palin appeared as a potential presidential candidate. If she wasn't worth mention before, why would she be so now?

And I'm hoping someone will put the question to McCain about who his VP candidate would be if Obama were not black. The charge of cynical tokenism applies here as much as it did back when Rice's name was being thrown about as a possibility, back when Clinton had a chance.
posted by troybob at 3:51 PM on August 29, 2008


Women have abortions when they have 'stupid sex' with men who won't use condoms.

With so much trolling potential in a thread like this, that's the best you could do? Amateur.
posted by iamabot at 3:53 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


If it weren't for the topic of abortion I'd be tempted to drink the kool-aid.

So, knowing that the country could not possibly go back to outlawing abortion, you still choose to go with the less qualified and attractive candidate, because they mouth the right words on abortion? Let me know how that foot feels after the bullet passes through it.
posted by Mental Wimp at 3:55 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


It's awesomely complex and nobody knows for certain the moment when a mass of cells becomes something other than a mass of cells

We do know for certain, however, that baring a natural miscarriage, if you don't kill those living cells, a living human baby will be born. So any type of argument that claims a human life is not ended by abortion flies in the face of the very reason people have them in the first place.
posted by jsonic at 3:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Please... don't bare a natural miscarriage.

And this is hardly fertile ground for the same old abortion debate everyone has had a thousand times.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 3:58 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Clinton's statement on Palin:
"We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain. While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate."
Not exactly what DaShiv was predicting, I think.
posted by spiderwire at 3:58 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


re: beauty queen Because it's very clearly that it's being used in this thread, if not outright, but as a subtext, to insinuate that somehow she's not smart enough to be Veep.

I am halfway through 400+ posts, and I want to say I'm not getting that impression at all. Some people just want to see that subtext.
posted by glycolized at 3:59 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]



With so much trolling potential in a thread like this, that's the best you could do? Amateur.


Yes, sad. That comment (the condom one) was for jsonic. MEN who rage on about abortion piss me off.

I got carried away ... I will go now ...

... lighting candles for shriveling penises.
posted by Surfurrus at 4:00 PM on August 29, 2008


I am not a McCain supporter. I know nothing about Sarah Palin. I wouldn't vote for John McCain if Zombie Jesus himself was his running mate.

However. I would like to remind everyone that is yapping about "blah blah beauty pageant blah blah blah not smart enough to be VP blah blah blah" that Gerald Ford was a male model and coached JV Cheerleading before becoming VP, and then later, POTUS.

(That's not to say I'm a fan of Gerald Ford, either. It's just to say OH SHUT UP. Being pretty does NOT equal being stupid.)
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:00 PM on August 29, 2008


We do know for certain, however, that baring a natural miscarriage, if you don't kill those living cells, a living human baby will be born. So any type of argument that claims a human life is not ended by abortion flies in the face of the very reason people have them in the first place.

So what? The question is not what will it turn into, but what is it now, when it is still a zygote. And the answer is, we don't know. We just don't know when we should define it as human life. That's not an issue science can answer, and neither is it an issue religions agree on (nor should they be the ones to decide.) Which is why pro-choice is called pro-choice -- because, in the absense of certainty, the only fair thing we can do is allow the person (and I mean the person we know to be a person) affected by it to be the one to choose, base don their own ethics and morals and ability to reason.

Really, this is abortion debate 101. Go out and read a little, why don't you?
posted by Astro Zombie at 4:01 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


The question of the presidency is not resolved by the colour of the contendants skin it is asked by wether they have been circumcised or not?
posted by dollyknot at 4:01 PM on August 29, 2008


So any type of argument that claims a human life is not ended by abortion flies in the face of the very reason people have them in the first place.

FFS. Other things that will end a potential human life:

Condoms
The Pill
Getting turned down at the bar
posted by mkultra at 4:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


For future reference, here's a direct link to the Alaska Daily News article about Palin flying down to the Texas Governor's conference while 36 months pregnant with her Down syndrome child.

Way up in the thread, dollyknot commented that this (i.e., Palin's selection) just shows what is wrong with democracy.

Wrong. It shows that the way we implement democracy is broken. When you amalgamate opinion using a single vote system, you tend to wind up with two dominant parties (Duverger's Law). Of course, I'm slightly unhinged on this topic, never mind me.
posted by Araucaria at 4:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Male models can't walk and chew gum.
posted by Artw at 4:02 PM on August 29, 2008


She's not stupid because Gerald Ford wasn't stupid, grapefruitmoon? Eehhhh.... not a winning argument!!
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 4:03 PM on August 29, 2008


While I'm fantasizing about Canadian female pols in US politics, maybe we could take Carolyn Parrish off your hands?

Who was that woman I saw you with last night?

That was no woman - that was the ex-MP for Mississauga-Erindale!

I'm here all week, try the veal!

Besides, who would Parish score cheap points off of in the US? Hating Mexicans? oh god, I think I may actually be right

Still, Canada has had several female politicians that could both kick Palin's ass in a street fight and shut her down in a debate. Mainly I'm thinking of Sheila Cops here, whom I would not want to meet in either a dark alley or a parliamentary debate. Maybe McCain could have picked Belinda Stronach who kind of walks the Liberal-Conservative line. VPILF indeed. Rumors say Mr. Clinton may have.
posted by GuyZero at 4:03 PM on August 29, 2008


We do know for certain, however, that baring a natural miscarriage, if you don't kill those living cells, a living human baby will be born. So any type of argument that claims a human life is not ended by abortion flies in the face of the very reason people have them in the first place.

Are you, with a straight face, trying to present the idea that life-begins-at-conception isn't a matter of ongoing debate?

The less contentious phrasing here would be "prevented from developing", not "ended". And pushing into a fullblown rehash of that question is wandering pretty far afield from Palin, regardless.
posted by cortex at 4:03 PM on August 29, 2008


onlyconnect, it was a relief to read your excellent comment. You were able to articulate things that had only vaguely rattled around in the back of my thoughts. Thank you. Since the planet is divided fairly equally between the genders, it's always been so disheartening and bewildering to see, experience, the still rampant misogyny.

I never did like Hillary Clinton especially but I would have voted for her, reluctantly. However, I do think it was expected for her to be Obama's VP choice and when Biden was chosen it seemed lame, imo. The energy Hillary has put into Obama's election after she lost, it almost seems as if she has been like a VP choice. When McCain picked a female VP candidate, my first thought was how pathetically copycat wannabe. The thing is, by choosing a female VP, McCain may well get a larger percent of the women's vote. And that would be awful.

I just hope the Democrats are able to win.
posted by nickyskye at 4:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


There are 209 posts on the 18-hour-old Metafilter thread about Obama's historic nomination acceptance speech. This 8-hour-old thread, discussing McCain's VP choice of a little-known person with a thin resume, has 650 posts and rising. Palin's name and face are all over the front of every major news site, while coverage of the DNC has pretty much disappeared. Well played, McCain. I am worried.
posted by FrauMaschine at 4:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


36 months pregnant?

FFS. Other things that will end a potential human life:

Condoms
The Pill
Getting turned down at the bar


At least two of those will be illegal in 8 years time.
posted by Artw at 4:04 PM on August 29, 2008


However. I would like to remind everyone that is yapping about "blah blah beauty pageant blah blah blah not smart enough to be VP blah blah blah" that Gerald Ford was a male model and coached JV Cheerleading before becoming VP, and then later, POTUS.

Gerald Ford was not known for having either a good mind or good presidency.
posted by mkultra at 4:06 PM on August 29, 2008


We do know for certain, however, that baring a natural miscarriage, if you don't kill those living cells, a living human baby will be born. So any type of argument that claims a human life is not ended by abortion flies in the face of the very reason people have them in the first place.

And if you don't spay or neuter your pets, kittens will be born. STOP SPAYING YOUR PETS. WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE KITTENS.

Human life is not ended by abortion. What is removed in an abortion is not human. It is not viable. It can not live outside the uterus. It is, essentially, a tumor. A network of cells dependent on the host organism for growth. It is a human when it is born, living and breathing on its own. Trying to justify a pro-life stance by advocating that "babies" are killed isn't scientifically accurate and is a thinly veiled appeal to emotion, not reason.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:06 PM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


Also, no tears for McCain not picking Meg Whitman? Was she really in the running in the end? She lacks the pageant credentials, but otherwise she's probably got more actual leadership experience than Palin. She could hire some developer to implement an eBay-like system for lobbyists to improve the economic efficiencies in buying off senators and house reps.
posted by GuyZero at 4:06 PM on August 29, 2008


grapefruitmoon, you are aware I'm sure that Gerald Ford was never elected to a National office? He was appointed VP, never elected to it, and we all know the rest of that story...
posted by Eekacat at 4:07 PM on August 29, 2008


She's not stupid because Gerald Ford wasn't stupid, grapefruitmoon? Eehhhh.... not a winning argument!!

No. She may be stupid because she's stupid. BUT. She's not stupid because she's pretty.

She may be pretty. She may be stupid. The two are NOT connected.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:08 PM on August 29, 2008


Konolia, I'd like to understand you and voters like you a bit better. What drives the abortion issue more for you with regard to presidential politics, is it that candidate's own belief that troubles you and colors your view of his judgement, or is it that you're afraid that he will appoint judges who will continue to not make abortion illegal? Or is it all the same thing?
posted by cell divide at 4:09 PM on August 29, 2008


True, Copps (especially) or Stronach would be better. I've just always had a weakness for the "screw it, I'm saying it" style of good ol' Carolyn. And doesn't McCain deserve being locked in a room with Parrish?

36 months pregnant, Arucaria? Holy shit! I'd be doing anything to bring that to an end I could, myself...
posted by QIbHom at 4:09 PM on August 29, 2008


Gerald Ford was not known for having either a good mind or good presidency.

Sure, I'm not debating that. I'm just saying that any perceived stupidity is completely INDEPENDENT of modeling/beauty pageant participation and it sticks in my craw to see people say "She was in beauty pageants! She can't be smart enough to be VP!"
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:10 PM on August 29, 2008


We do know for certain[sic], however, that baring[sic] a natural miscarriage, if you don't kill those living cells, a living human baby will be born.

[shaking his head like Reagan]There you go again, oversimplifying. Miscarriage isn't the only possibility and when you talk about possibilities rather than actualities, you are on a slippery slope. How probable does the anticipated human life have to be? As I've said before, each cell in your body is potentially a new human being, granted with very small probability, but if you wanted to you could get a molecular biologist to genetically engineer a clone from DNA out of one of your cells. So every time you spit, by your definition, human life is being killed.

Ah, well, we won't prosecute you when the laws change, murderer, but just know that you are one.
posted by Mental Wimp at 4:10 PM on August 29, 2008


I'm totally not going to vote for Palin just because I was a Hillary supporter. I'm voting Democrat because I agree with (most) of the Obama/Biden policies. However, I did think it was cool that she called her husband, "Alaska's First Dude" in that Bartiromo interview. I can't imagine Biden calling his wife "Delaware's First Chick."
posted by bluefly at 4:11 PM on August 29, 2008


Clinton's statement on Palin

I assume this means Hillary Clinton's statement on Palin; the link didn't specify exactly which Clinton this was, I'll assume it was her. Interesting that her comment on Palin is almost an exact mirror of what McCain said about Obama in the nomination ad.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 4:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


grapefruitmoon, you are aware I'm sure that Gerald Ford was never elected to a National office? He was appointed VP, never elected to it, and we all know the rest of that story...

Oh geez. What brand of shampoo are we going to use on all of these hairs that we are splitting? I was talking about how any physical attractiveness-based program activities do NOT immediately place the participants on the short bus, ineligible for national office. Should we instead debate the merits of Gerald Ford's entire political career?
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:14 PM on August 29, 2008


OTOH if Palin offered me beer and nachos, I would accept.
posted by a robot made out of meat at 4:14 PM on August 29, 2008


I personally don't care that a fetus could become a human being. I am ALREADY a human being, with legally given rights.

I am very afraid right now that they are going to make the entire election about abortion. And that if McCain is made President, well, I can kiss my reproductive rights (as well as many of those pesky Constitutional rights) out the window.

I'm not engaging in hyperbole - I am honestly, deeply, truly afraid.
posted by agregoli at 4:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


wedged between Pope and Bragg

Point of order: Pope is wedged INSIDE Bragg. No rednecks in between, sorry.
posted by konolia at 4:15 PM on August 29, 2008


Should we instead debate the merits of Gerald Ford's entire political career?

It's less tedious and fresher than the abortion debate.
posted by GuyZero at 4:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I was talking about how any physical attractiveness-based program activities do NOT immediately place the participants on the short bus, ineligible for national office.

But why not? It's pretty laughable to engage in.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 4:19 PM on August 29, 2008


I don't understand, everybody seems to be completely missing the most important qualification:

Was she a POW or wasn't she?
posted by Flunkie at 4:19 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


But to try and claim that abortion doesn't end a developing baby's life runs counter to the ENTIRE reason people have abortions in the first place.

Which puts you in full support of Forced Childbirth, which is pretty much the bottom-line of the anti-abortion position. Which leads logically to the concept that any action to prevent conception is also immoral as another attempt to deny future children their lives. But you very nearly admitted the simple fact that fetuses are potential human life and, in the first few weeks, as close to a living human as a completed set of blueprints and a cleared lot are to a constructed house.

But even as one who places a distinct line between potential and realized human life, I still find the evidence that Mrs. Palin gave making an out-of-state poltical appearance priority over her unborn child's future life and health earlier this year to be extremely significant.
posted by wendell at 4:20 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


(That's not to say I'm a fan of Gerald Ford, either. It's just to say OH SHUT UP. Being pretty does NOT equal being stupid.)

Look, really, before you go tossing around the "OH SHUT UP"s, how many people are saying that? At this point you're willfully ignoring many responses to your same accusation, but I'll go ahead and say it again:

Beauty Pageant Contestant does NOT = Sarah Palin is stupid!

Beauty Pageant Contestant does = Sarah Palin supporting a practice many of us disagree with and fight against as feminists. Does being pretty mean you have to take part in competitions designed to rank and judge women based on their looks, as if society itself wasn't bad enough?
posted by Solon and Thanks at 4:20 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I would vote Obama regardless of the abortion issue (I'm stridently anti-abortion), what I'm wondering is, how many of you that embrace abortion rights more than, say, the right to belong to a religion, would NOT vote for McCain because of this veep pick?
What I mean is, is the right to abort an unborn human as large an issue to you as it seems? cause I'm getting the distinct impression some would not vote for a candidate based solely on their being opposed to abortion
on another note, will Firefox ever lean that Obama Barak is not a misspelling?
posted by dawson at 4:21 PM on August 29, 2008


Palin on the Charlie Rose show.

I saw this when it aired, and was actually pretty impressed with her. I in no way think that she is presidential material, but... she's impressive on camera.
posted by Espoo2 at 4:21 PM on August 29, 2008


She may be pretty. She may be stupid. The two are NOT connected.

Which is why the whole "it's a scholarship program" angle is such a joke.
posted by hydrophonic at 4:21 PM on August 29, 2008


I'm not engaging in hyperbole - I am honestly, deeply, truly afraid.

I'm pretty much assuming that's what's happening and that forcing the election to be an up down poll on abortion means an automatic win for the Republicans - because arguing against abortion is tricky (see: this thread), and if it's the only thing anyone talks about democrats can't really NOT tackle it.

If anyone has a good argument as to why I'm wrong so I can not be horribly depressed for this weekend (and the next two months) I'd be really happy to hear it right now.
posted by Artw at 4:22 PM on August 29, 2008


I don't think she's stupid because she was the runner up for Miss Alaska. I think she's funny because she was the runner up for Miss Alaska.
posted by Astro Zombie at 4:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Hello Whatsitsname,

Metafilter you are the star, whatever the result of the American fool elections.

A fool will end up running the human race.

okay.

Ask me why
posted by dollyknot at 4:23 PM on August 29, 2008


Oh, and also Sarah Palin got a 4 year scholarship from being in that beauty pageant. How 'stupid' is that I ask?
posted by dawson at 4:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


An interview with Sarah Palin by Newsweek. Topics include her beauty queen past, her reaction to the media treatment of Hillary Clinton, motherhood and politics, corruption in Alaskan politics, partisanship and criticism of her by the Republican party.
posted by netbros at 4:24 PM on August 29, 2008


Just to throw the discussion off on another ridiculous tangent:

Am I the only one who thinks that Mrs. Palin resembles a slighly older version of Tina Fey? (Or is that just the glasses?)
posted by wendell at 4:24 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


on non-preview, me go now.
posted by dawson at 4:24 PM on August 29, 2008


John McCain's gimmick: He doesn't even know Sarah Palin. They've only met twice.

No one knows Palin [video | 01:19].
posted by ericb at 4:24 PM on August 29, 2008


Human life is not ended by abortion

If a pregnant lady lets her baby develop, then a human life is born. If she has an abortion, then no baby is born. Yet you continue to claim that a human life is not actively ended by abortion. Regardless of one's opinion on when human life begins, the result is the same. This is completely different than the pill (in most cases) and condoms where no life has already started developing.

And this whole argument of "hey, a miscarriage might happen, so it's ok if we kill it now regardless" makes no sense and is kinda twisted. Might as well kill old people then, they might have a heart-attack tomorrow.
posted by jsonic at 4:24 PM on August 29, 2008


The Colonel Tigh (R- Hanoi Hilton)/Laura Roslin (R- Bosom of Jesus) ticket is actually going to be very hard to beat.
posted by darth_tedious at 4:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


Yawns widely

Smiles sadly
posted by dollyknot at 4:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin is a fundamentalist whacko. Obama is a poor choice to lead the charge against fundamentalist whack jobs, because he believes that religion is politically useful and should be rewarded by government.
posted by Brian B. at 4:27 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


And this whole argument of "hey, a miscarriage might happen, so it's ok if we kill it now regardless" makes no sense and is kinda twisted. Might as well kill old people then, they might have a heart-attack tomorrow.

Yeah, as I thought. You're not following the discussion at all, have not bothered to research it, and are falling back on the tiredest, most reductive argument of all, despite its flaws being repeatedly pointed out. I'm done.
posted by Astro Zombie at 4:27 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


60 Days To Judge a Commander in Chief?
"I'm going to be very blunt, here. I wish Senator McCain a very long and happy life. But, at age 72 with a history of cancer, John McCain may not live through his first term, if elected. That would make Sarah Palin our Commander in Chief. I, and other vets and troops, have about 60 days to determine if she'll grow to be ready.

She's not ready now -- not based on the complete blank resume on global strategic issues and veterans issues. To be fair, Barack Obama wasn't ready to be Commander in Chief when he became Senator in 2005.

But, over the course of the last few years, and the last year-and-a-half in particular, I've been able to soundly judge Senator Obama, and watch him grow into a readied potential Commander in Chief. In the Senate, serving on the Foreign Affairs committee, he's tackled some of the major issues of our time, asking probing and highly informed questions of military leaders and diplomatic leaders.

I've been able to watch his thought process in action, and have seen him been proven right on Iraq, right on Afghanistan, right on talking to Iran, and right on the war on terror. He's shown an incredible ability to think in much larger strategic terms than this president, to the point that I'm supremely confident he is ready to lead our Armed Forces.

Sarah Palin? God only knows."

-- Jon Soltz, Co-Founder and Chair of VoteVets.org
posted by ericb at 4:28 PM on August 29, 2008 [9 favorites]


McCain Spokeswoman: I Have No Idea What McCain's Relationship Is With Palin.
posted by ericb at 4:31 PM on August 29, 2008


Oh, and also Sarah Palin got a 4 year scholarship from being in that beauty pageant. How 'stupid' is that I ask?

I don't think it's stupid. I think it's selling out, assuming she considers herself a feminist in a first place. It's like showing your boobs at mardi gras for beads. She got beads, how awesome! Who cares about setting women back or giving in to the disgusting misogynists who run the competitions... beads!!
posted by Solon and Thanks at 4:31 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


“As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day? I’m used to being very productive and working real hard in an administration. We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question.”
Excuse me?

She wants to be Vice President of the United States of America so long as she can use her position to benefit Alaskans specifically?
posted by Flunkie at 4:32 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'm not educated about these things, but is it customary in the Army to be deployed exactly one year to the day after you have enlisted? For him to be shipped off to Iraq on September 11th, it all seems so .. contrived.
posted by Ugh at 4:35 PM on August 29, 2008


Palin is seemingly unaware of McCain’s Iraq plan.
"In an August 14 interview with Time Magazine, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK), now Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) running mate, suggested that McCain had not shared his plan for Iraq with her. Palin, who has not been to Iraq, said she does not know 'what the plan is to ever end the war.' She later said its 'tough' to 'talk about the plan for the war' because her son will be deployed to Iraq this September. 'Let’s make sure we have a plan here,' she said. Palin then added, 'respecting McCain’s position on that too though.'

Matt Duss notes that by trying to 'make news with an unknown, stunt VP pick, McCain has shortchanged the issue which he himself insists is the most important — national security.'"
posted by ericb at 4:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I would vote Obama regardless of the abortion issue (I'm stridently anti-abortion), what I'm wondering is, how many of you that embrace abortion rights more than, say, the right to belong to a religion, would NOT vote for McCain because of this veep pick? What I mean is, is the right to abort an unborn human as large an issue to you as it seems?

I'd choose the first amendment over Roe v. Wade, if that's what you're asking. Though I think the likelihood of seeing in my lifetime a candidate who'd strike the First and uphold Roe run against one who'd do the opposite, in a situation where both would be equally likely to succeed at those goals if elected, is...low.

In the real world, I don't think McCain's choice of VP would have any effect at all at whether Roe would be overturned as a result of a McCain presidency, no matter who he'd picked. He'll either get the chance to appoint justices or he won't. After that, it's in the hands of the court. It's more that choosing a pro-life VP reassures pro-life voters that he's really pro-life.
posted by lampoil at 4:41 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


YouTube footage of Sarah Palin calling Hillary Clinton's criticism of sexist media coverage as a perceived whine.
posted by jonp72 at 4:44 PM on August 29, 2008


There are 209 posts on the 18-hour-old Metafilter thread about Obama's historic nomination acceptance speech. This 8-hour-old thread, discussing McCain's VP choice of a little-known person with a thin resume, has 650 posts and rising. Palin's name and face are all over the front of every major news site, while coverage of the DNC has pretty much disappeared.

It's certainly getting attention, but I think a full week of around-the-clock coverage would be neccesary just to get people to remember her name. And I think all the comments in this thread are indicative not of McCain's bold and decisive whatever, but of how completely hilarious a choice this was.
posted by Uppity Pigeon #2 at 4:45 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Sarah Palin's Workout
Coming Sept. 6 in the debut issue of WSJ. Magazine, a conversation with Gov. Sarah Palin about her unusual fitness routine. Preview excerpt :P

viz!
posted by kliuless at 4:45 PM on August 29, 2008


grapefruitmoon, no, I'm not splitting hairs with you at all. Gerald Ford is just a bad example to use for anything Presidential since he never had to run for the national office he held, and when he did run, he lost. He was pretty much put in to be a patsy for a corrupt administration, and the fact he was a male model was probably to his benefit in getting confirmed. A dumb pretty boy was preferable to a jowly schemer.
posted by Eekacat at 4:46 PM on August 29, 2008


McCain Spokeswoman: I Have No Idea What McCain's Relationship Is With Palin.

Well it's not like McCains going to know either.
posted by Artw at 4:48 PM on August 29, 2008


Flunkie: "Excuse me?

She wants to be Vice President of the United States of America so long as she can use her position to benefit Alaskans specifically?
"

To be completely fair, she's the Gov of AK. I don't think there's any shame in, when acting in that capacity, publicly desiring the best for one's constituency.

Less subtle: the other 49 weren't here problem then: they are now.
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 4:50 PM on August 29, 2008


Kliuless, that interview is so freaking cutesy.

And I always wear sunglasses. My kids tell me to put them on so I don't freak people out when they see me with a goofy hairdo and no makeup."

Yay!
posted by agregoli at 4:51 PM on August 29, 2008


Put me in the camp that thinks this pick was used as a distraction and she'll be replaced by someone else soon.
posted by diogenes at 4:51 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Gov. Palin, a mother of five kids, says exercise is still very much a "family thing." She and her husband, Todd, also an athlete, named their first son Track because he was born in that sport's season.

Good thing he wasn't born in a different season.

"TEAM HANDBALL PALIN! Dinner time! And get your sister Synchronized Diving!"
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 4:51 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Beauty Pageant Contestant does = Sarah Palin supporting a practice many of us disagree with and fight against as feminists. Does being pretty mean you have to take part in competitions designed to rank and judge women based on their looks, as if society itself wasn't bad enough?

I'm getting a lot of vibes from this thread that I've encountered a lot in Meat Space that, well, stick in my craw. And the vibes go as follows: attractive women are not allowed to "flaunt" said attractiveness without every other thing that they may ever do being negated by other women. You, yourself, say that she is participating in a system that is anti-feminist and that itself is worthy of scorn. So, you, as a feminist feel that beauty pageants are awful. Great. Don't participate in them! It doesn't strike me as very "feminist" to me to hear the message "You can be pretty, or you can be smart, but you can't be both!"

I'm a feminist. I've also worked as a model, both in fashion and in art. Not extensively, mind, but I have put myself on display to be ranked and judged - willingly. Did being pretty mean that I *had* to do this? No. But it was MY CHOICE. I refuse to accept that if you're a woman and you're pretty, that you should do everything you can to deny that or else you're a "bad feminist." And this is a message that I hear from other women, all the time.

Her decision to participate in a beauty pageant has no bearing on her ability to be VP. None. Whatsoever. Any faults she may have are completely independent of physical attractiveness and how she chooses to present it. If she is a "bad feminist," it is because of her political opinions, not because she won Miss Congeniality.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


It's not the team sitting on a safe lead that calls for a Hail Mary -- but then again, the play's been known to win many a game. It's not exactly a smart play, but not quite as desperate as an onside kick or faked punt, either. It's a risky, usually unsuccessful maneuver that occasionally reaps massive dividends. Palin means McCain is a gambling man.
Well that's certainly a fantastic characteristic for a President.

Oh, wait, I didn't mean "fantastic". I got confused, because the word I meant to say is also an adjective.
posted by Flunkie at 4:57 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


If a pregnant lady lets her baby develop, then a human life is born. If she has an abortion, then no baby is born. Yet you continue to claim that a human life is not actively ended by abortion. Regardless of one's opinion on when human life begins, the result is the same. This is completely different than the pill (in most cases) and condoms where no life has already started developing.

I think viability is a lousy metric to use to define personhood. It is ridiculously reductive, saying nothing about why a human life is important. I would suggest that it begins with the development of mind and the capacity for experience, a view that I expect many to most others here share. This is a process that begins, most neurologic evidence suggests, at some point fairly comfortably into the third trimester. Shrilly harping on about murdering unborn lives or whatever is doing very little to convince me that your metric is right and mine is wrong. May I suggest you take some time out to reflect on arguments you could make to me and others that at least carry some recognition of and which are directed towards this difference in our fundamental assumptions? I bet everyone will find it to be more interesting, and who knows, maybe there is some possibility that you'll convince someone of something.
posted by monocyte at 4:57 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I don't think it's stupid. I think it's selling out, assuming she considers herself a feminist in a first place. It's like showing your boobs at mardi gras for beads. She got beads, how awesome! Who cares about setting women back or giving in to the disgusting misogynists who run the competitions... beads!!

This is exactly what I'm talking about.

Do we really all need to grow mullets and wear cargo pants and burlap sacks to be good feminists? Because you're going to have to rip my mascara out of my cold, dead hands.
posted by grapefruitmoon at 4:59 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


By the way, I'm going to add about Palin's scholarship. I have a four year scholarship for a higher ranked university than UI and I wasn't even in the top third of my high school class. I'm not a prodigy in anything, either - I practiced a lot for tests, in addition to applying to a lot of scholarships and spending a lot of time on essays.

Forgive me for not having a lot of patience with people who feel they'd rather earn a scholarship by trotting around in a swimsuit and having people score them. God. Don't get me wrong, they can do whatever they want to get that money - I just don't feel they represent me and have in fact done more to hurt my reputation as a woman than they have helped.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 5:00 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Palin's name and face are all over the front of every major news site, while coverage of the DNC has pretty much disappeared.

Fine by me. 38 MILLION people watched Barack's speech. The quicker the pundits talk about something else and let that direct experience marinate, the better. The alternative is is Fox newscasters and Ron Fournier of the AP explaining why Obama's speech wasn't what it appeared to be.
posted by msalt at 5:00 PM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


Do we really all need to grow mullets and wear cargo pants and burlap sacks to be good feminists? Because you're going to have to rip my mascara out of my cold, dead hands.

Did I say that? Do you really see no difference between wearing what one wants and participating in being judged and scored based basically solely on your looks? Do you not understand how one is a fundamentally messed up practice designed to perpetrate the idea that it's fine and dandy to judge women based on how pretty they are?

I love my mascara, too, but if someone wants to score me based on my appearance they're going to find that nice stick of mascara jammed into their forehead.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 5:02 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Jesus tap-dancing Christ. If McCain wanted a former beauty queen with no experience and a criminal investigation on her record I don’t know why he didn’t just pick his own wife.

Maybe, but she's not NRA, not very religious (only pious), not all the kids are her own and she a second wife, not good for the ultraconservatives, and she had problems with drugs. She much more Diana than a soccer mom.

I guess McCain is going for identification, attempting to look less "librl lol" to some audience, captivating their vote, while looking moderate, but still better than Obama just because he's not librl, lol! bump and shit. Any critic direct to Palin could be seen as an attack to an archetype conservative, doesn't matter if it's an witty observation, it will be framed as an otrageous attack.
posted by elpapacito at 5:03 PM on August 29, 2008


Lets say that the only requisite for being a feminist is not objectifying women. Beauty Pageants make that... dissonant at best.
posted by butterstick at 5:04 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


FWIW I'd consider modeling a lot less weird and creepy than beauty pageant. Other things I consider less creepy than beauty pageant would include softcore and spiders.
posted by Artw at 5:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Things more creepy than beauty pageants: Dolls.
posted by Artw at 5:05 PM on August 29, 2008


Have you seen child beauty pageants, Artw? Pretty much combine the two. Terrifying.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 5:06 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Put me in the camp that thinks this pick was used as a distraction and she'll be replaced by someone else soon.

Does this mean that there's still hope of a McCain/Romney ticket? It's been my dream all year to see Romney somewhere on the national ballot...
posted by kaibutsu at 5:06 PM on August 29, 2008


grapefruitmoon, I hear where you're coming from, I do. But her participation in beauty pageants, when combined with her known political positions, contributes to my viewing of her as someone who does not hold the same values as me - particularly feminist ones.

I still can't quite grok it - you don't have to "deny" your attractiveness to be truly feminist. But I'm not going to be all fuzzy about someone who says they are a feminist and yet participates in a competition with other women to be judged the most beautiful, when that is a metric often used to "rate" women outside of competitions, where it most certainly doesn't belong.

Your being a model in both fashion and art, is slightly different than being in a competition soley judging on looks. Both the fashion and art industries, despite their known evil connotations, are still based on good design and a desire for an artistic aesthetic. I can get behind that in many instances. Beauty pageants, not so much. I get what you're saying, I do...but I don't agree.
posted by agregoli at 5:07 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Solon - They scare the living shit out of me to the point where I consider them to be a portion of the ULTRA-WRONG UNIVERSE into the earthly plane.
posted by Artw at 5:07 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


what if McCain dies?

Indeed. With Tim Russert's sudden demise, Bernie Mac's turn for the worse -- I don't know which bothers me more, McCain's vulnerability to the onset of illness or his seeming obliviousness to the fact that whoever serves as VP, will have to be "ready" at a moment's notice.
posted by skyper at 5:07 PM on August 29, 2008


so, dearest barack: you may have a funny name, you may be black, you may be against abortion, you may have a real problem with the hillary crowd but the republicans seem to have acquired a taste for that old dance the democrats have very nearly perfected since the days of good old hapless george mc govern. you may be hopeful.
Barack Obama is a consistent and strong supporter of the right to choose.
posted by Flunkie at 5:09 PM on August 29, 2008


Does it have to be the VP?
posted by Artw at 5:09 PM on August 29, 2008


We all know that to date, Obama has received the lion's share of media coverage in this race.

Hmm, but look at this - so far mefites have offered:
209 comments on Obama's speech last night
653 comments on McCain's selection of Palin.

McCain's choice is, at the very least, getting him some attention.
posted by marlys at 5:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Put me in the camp that thinks this pick was used as a distraction and she'll be replaced by someone else soon.

There's no way that could be worth the horrible PR of screwing up your first VP pick. No, they (hilariously) mean to ride this one out.
posted by Bookhouse at 5:11 PM on August 29, 2008


The New Nixon
posted by homunculus at 5:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


(was she the shortest-serving PM ever?)

Nope, that was Sir Charles Tupper, for 2 months in 1896. For 9 days in 1894 we had no PM at all though, so Nobody wins the race for shortest term, as it were, lol.
posted by zarah at 5:16 PM on August 29, 2008


I wonder if anybody will notice this completely off-topic and useless comment in this vast sea of debate. *crosses fingers*
posted by tehloki at 5:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [20 favorites]


I assume this means Hillary Clinton's statement on Palin; the link didn't specify exactly which Clinton this was, I'll assume it was her.

Yeah, it's from TalkLeft and it wasn't cited, so take it for what you will, etc. I'm hopeful that Hillary will at least eventually take a few swings -- I think DaShiv's right that her political and personal motives, as far as I'm able to divine them, both seem to counsel in favor of it.

The pandering that's implicit in the pick would have been bad enough on its own. But for Palin to explicitly invoke Hillary's campaign and to check the "18 million cracks" line is an insult. Hillary Clinton has been a New York Senator for longer than Sarah Palin has even been governor. Clinton was the First Lady of the United States and an accomplished national figure in her own right before Palin even entered politics as the mayor of a 9,000-person podunk town in Alaska. I mean, give me a break.

I wouldn't have said the same thing about, say, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, or any of a number of other eminently-qualified women who were apparently vetted by the McCain campaign. But this is lame.
posted by spiderwire at 5:19 PM on August 29, 2008


750 comments? Crazy

Other things I consider less creepy than beauty pageant would include softcore and spiders.

That seems very strange. Although I do think people have a stereotype of beauty pageant participants as being, well, not that bright.

attractive women are not allowed to "flaunt" said attractiveness without every other thing that they may ever do being negated by other women.

Well, attractive women are allowed to "flaunt" their attractiveness by men, but of course less attractive women are going to be jealous. Attractive women are able to achieve much more in life due to their good looks. What is a less attractive woman going to say "gosh, she's dumber then me and lazier, but she's so good looking so I don't mind her working half as hard for ten times as much money!"
posted by delmoi at 5:20 PM on August 29, 2008


I wouldn't have said the same thing about, say, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, or any of a number of other eminently-qualified women who were apparently vetted by the McCain campaign. But this is lame.

They went with Palin because she's a huckabeesque bible Thumper. The other women that were being considered for the job were much more feminist (read: pro-life).

Sarah Palin is not going to pick up disaffected Hillary voters, but she will really help congeal the religious part of the base, and make lots of news.
posted by delmoi at 5:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


She and her husband, Todd, also an athlete, named their first son Track because he was born in that sport's season.

Drome would have worked better.
posted by netbros at 5:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Alaska Legislature's report on Palin's trouper scandal to be released in the first couple days of November...
posted by delmoi at 5:27 PM on August 29, 2008


In addition to what I wrote above, let' see what Rush had to say to his loyal audience when John introduced her (just some bits taken here and there):

RUSH: He just bashed the liberals! All right!
RUSH: Okay, here she comes. She's coming out with her family and her husband who works in the oil business helping to create the fuel that Obama uses to fly all over the country.
RUSH: This is going so well. She's wearing a skirt, too, folks. She just introduced her family. Her husband and her celebrating their 20th anniversary today.
RUSH: Hockey mom. Pistol-packing hockey mom!
PALIN: It was rightly noted in Denver this week that Hillary left 18 million cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling in America. But it turns out the women of America aren't finished yet, and we can shatter that glass ceiling once and for all!
posted by elpapacito at 5:27 PM on August 29, 2008


Just chiming in here with those who said that abortion will be one of the central themes of this election -- except that it will probably be embedded into a broader theme. Something like 'family values' or 'American values'.

This is bad news for Obama: He will try to tip-toe around the issue, giving non-committal statements, whereas the other camp will just state their opinion straightforwardly. Straight-talk indeed. Obama is going to look bad in the process. Can he be trusted? Isn't his tiptoeing precisely the kind of politics he was promising to change? And speaking of change, why isn't he willing to do anything about the 100,000 babies killed each year? And if he doesn't care, why would he care about our troops in Iraq?

Also, like Artw said, experience just became utterly irrelevant. And for a good reason. Obama doesn't look or sound inexperienced. Casting him as inexperienced didn't work for Hillary, so why should it work for McCain?

In addition, I think there will be an additional 'Alaska angle'. Such as a stand-off with Russia regarding oil fields near Alaska that now have suddenly become accessible. This will not only create a general sense of crisis that will make the ex-POW look like the better choice, but will also give Palin the chance to look knowledgeable and relevant. ("Joe Biden may know a lot about Iranian arms programs, but how often has he been to Alaska? Obama may be popular in Europe, but will he do what is necessary to defend the largest state of the union?")

To sum up, this was a brilliant move. I can't wait to learn what they come up with next.
posted by sour cream at 5:29 PM on August 29, 2008


A great pick for McCain. A few hours ago I got an email from Joe Biden via Obama's website saying that today McCain would announce who the next Dick Cheney would be. Can they really paint this lady as Dick Cheney? Takes away a lot of the "McCain is Bush" rhetoric.

Her experience is a concern but Obama can't bring it up without the conversation turning to his own lack of experience, which is a conversation McCain wants to have. FWIW, executive experience is more valuable than senatorial experience. Until Gore and Cheney, the VP's job was basically to wake up and see if the president was dead. Perhaps we're going back to those days in either case.

Lots of dems are excited to see the VP debates, but how can Biden pound on a pretty, polite mother of 5? A difficult feat to pull off. Besides, here's a prediction on the VP debates: Republicans will say Palin is won and Dems will say Biden won.

With regards to military issues, a big cry from the anti-war crowd over the past 8 years was how Bush/Cheney's sent other people's kids to war when they never served and their own kids didn't either. Now you have two Iraq war proponents who's own children served or will serve in Iraq.

Finally, she's a pro-gun, pro-life mom with traditional values, which should play well to the religious right McCain was said to have trouble with.

The more I think about it, the more this shuts down so many of Obama's arguments. It's a really, really great pick, politically at least.
posted by b_thinky at 5:32 PM on August 29, 2008


I've never understood why it's OK for people to flaunt/use their intelligence (which you are to a large extent born with) to get ahead, but not their appearance. Both have a big innate quality, and both can be shaped by hard work (exercise, hygiene, etc in the case of appearance).

And the idea that all women are hurt because some choose to use their appearance seems equally lame. If you have to change your behavior based on what others (those who judge women solely/mostly on appearance for all things, ie assholes) are doing, they've still won. Women should be free to make either choice, like men are (or for the lucky ones, both). Maybe society is not quite there yet, but I don't think that should restrict individuals decisions on their own lives.
posted by wildcrdj at 5:32 PM on August 29, 2008


She admits that she used marijuana when it was legal in Alaska, but says that she did not like it.

FAIL.

First off, she's not extremely attractive (no more so than Cynthia McKinney), so let's just throw out that canard.

Second, I don't get the whole P.U.M.A. thing. Until today, I thought the puma slang term meant "cougar in training."

Did they pick that name on purpose? Ugh.

If you support Hillary Clinton and hate Barack Obama because of "the lack of respect" he gave to Clinton supporters, wouldn't you be better off supporting Cynthia McKinney or Ralph Nader (who lean much closer to Clinton politically) than John McCain?

I've known women who would tell you that there's no reason to get specifically screened for Downs unless you're at least thinking of abortion.

Agreed. Can anyone explain why else you would screen for genetic abnormalities unless you were considering abortion if the tests came back positive? My wife and I are expecting, and did not do any genetic or diagnostic testing because we wouldn't abort in any case.

It took many months for me to get my arms around the idea of, first, having a fifth child at my age, but also knowing that my child would have an extra chromosome.

So how and why did Sarah Palin find out ahead of time? Is there any other reason to test if you would never consider abortion?

If not, isn't the pro-choice story here that Sarah Palin had that choice to make and indeed made a choice, just like every other woman deserves?
posted by mrgrimm at 5:33 PM on August 29, 2008


So, how many favorites do we think DaShiv picks up in the next three months? I'm going with 2500. Seriously. Twenty five hundred favorites between now and and, say, two weeks after the election.
posted by Kwine at 5:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Can anyone explain why else you would screen for genetic abnormalities unless you were considering abortion if the tests came back positive?

Just off the top of my head; if you're particularly conscientious, you would probably need to learn about the adjustments you'll need to make to your life in the future to care for a child with Downs syndrome. Maybe people like to find out in advance so they can start preparing to care for a child with special needs?

You don't need to know the sex of your child (and I'd hope no-one out there is getting abortions based on the sex of their foetus) but it's something people like to find out. Now that the technology exists, why not find out about genetic conditions your child will have as well?
posted by Jimbob at 5:45 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin's name and face are all over the front of every major news site, while coverage of the DNC has pretty much disappeared.

Obama's speech was front-page news on most newspapers this morning. I watched CNN, MSNBC and NBC Nightly News this evening and they all covered last night's record-breaking speech -- albeit after a story on Palin.

There are 209 posts on the 18-hour-old Metafilter thread about Obama's historic nomination acceptance speech. This 8-hour-old thread, discussing McCain's VP choice of a little-known person with a thin resume, has 650 posts and rising.

Yeah. So, what?

The fact that this thread is generating more comments than the Obama Speech thread is indicative of the fact that Palin is such an 'unknown' that we here on MeFi seek to discuss her selection as a V.P. candidate, learn more about her past, qualifications, etc.

There's not much nuance left to discuss regarding Obama's phenomenal performance last night.
MSNBC Pat Buchanan – ‘It was a genuinely outstanding speech. It was magnificent. It is the finest – and I saw Cuomo’s speech, I saw Kennedy in ‘80, I even saw Douglas MacArthur, I saw Martin Luther King – this is the greatest convention speech, and probably the most important because unlike Cuomo and the others this is an acceptance speech. This came out of the heart of America and he went right at the heart of America…’

FOX Bill Kristol – ‘Barack Obama faced very high expectations tonight and honestly I think he met them and I honestly think he exceeded them…He eloquently explained America’s promise. He explained why the Bush Cheney administration had fallen short of that…I thought it was an awfully impressive performance.

CNN David Gergen – ‘In many ways it was less a speech than a symphony…It was a masterpiece’

MSNBC Tom Brokaw – ‘It was a wonderfully crafted political speech and the Republicans I’m sure were looking in and wondering what they’re going to be able to do next week to match it’

CNN Paul Begala – ‘He went fearlessly at John McCain’s greatest strength, national security. He went proudly into the social issue terrain that Democrats are usually so afraid of. He went boldly attacking the status quo of George Bush, Dick Cheney and John McCain, and then he went very comfortably in your living room…This is my ninth convention, it was as very nearly a perfect convention speech as I can imagine…’

MSNBC Chris Matthews – ‘I thought it was amazing – I’ve written speeches all my life, of course nothing like this…It was a great way of throwing back the other side’s best shot and saying it’s full of crap’

CNN Campbell Brown – ‘If anybody ever thought that Barack Obama was not tough enough to run against John McCain this speech should really put an end to that…’

FOX Chris Wallace – ‘I thought it was an exceedingly smart speech in which Barack Obama played offense and defense very effectively.’

CNN – Sen. Clinton delegates on Obama’s speech:
Jessica Yellin: ‘I have three people who as you say have been following this for a long time. Two of these women are Hillary Clinton supporters and I wanted to ask you first…

Woman: ‘Were.’

Yellin: ‘Were Hillary Clinton supporters. What turned you tonight?

Woman: ‘His speech, and I like her enjoyed it all but the end is what got me. You know, it’s a dream and it’s going to come true we gotta’ work for it. That’s what I got out of it.’”
posted by ericb at 5:45 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


A moment ago, I just saw video of her speech today. As she was talking, it genuinely looked like McCain was checking out her ass, or something like that.

I'm not snarking - I feel weird posting this, and it seemed genuinely bizarre to me. He kept doing it, too.

Did anyone else notice this, or am I imagining it?
posted by Flunkie at 5:49 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Google reveals that I am not alone in thinking that McCain was checking out her ass.
posted by Flunkie at 5:50 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin's name and face are all over the front of every major news site, while coverage of the DNC has pretty much disappeared.

BTW -- press coverage of the GOP convention this weekend (and next week) will likely have to compete with that of hurricane Gustav. A "split-screen" convention?

On Third Anniversary Of Katrina, Officials Aren’t Confident New Orleans’ Levees Can ‘Handle’ Gustav.
posted by ericb at 5:51 PM on August 29, 2008


Is there any other reason to test if you would never consider abortion?

Many women opt for the test so that they can prepare to care for a child with special needs. In addition, the "triple screen" test can also help to detect spina bifida, which may require surgery on the fetus while it's still in the womb.
posted by jrossi4r at 5:52 PM on August 29, 2008


Despite this anti-choice nut managing to push Obama off the front page, let us hold our heads high. We'll go dancing, everything will be all right.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 5:58 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


From the WP:
"Palin's political career began a decade later when she was elected to the Wasilla City Council and, four years after that, in 1996, she won the mayorship -- knocking off the incumbent by just a handful of votes."

Funny; I think there were only a handful of votes in total.
posted by kaibutsu at 5:59 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


A moment ago, I just saw video of her speech today. As she was talking, it genuinely looked like McCain was checking out her ass, or something like that.

Maybe he was looking at that lump on her back.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 5:59 PM on August 29, 2008


IIRC the same screening picks up things like Trisome 18, which causes fatal deformities, and which would in most cases lead to an abortion (the exception being die-hard pro-lifers).

(As I've mentioned elsewhere we had a risk factor for this, leading to an amnio which thankfully turned out negative, but it meant an extremely stressful time for us and some Googling that I really wish I hadn't done. )
posted by Artw at 5:59 PM on August 29, 2008


I keep seeing the video of this on the newsesque show that I'm watching. Now I'm thinking that there must have been a script on the lectern in front of her, and he must have been looking down at it, not at her ass.

She didn't seem to ever look down to the lectern, though.

But it has to be something like that. Doesn't it?

I mean, it was so blatant, and he did it so often.
posted by Flunkie at 6:07 PM on August 29, 2008


McCain has a history of having affairs with women that he works with, how will his wife feel about him working long hours with a younger, more attractive, more powerful woman? Having basically bought him his political career with her family money, how will she feel about him elevating a younger, more attractive woman to work along side him as an equal? I bet there are going to be some awkward conversations in the white house.

How long will it take John McCain to cheat on his wife again? He cheated on his first wife pretty much the first time that he met Cindy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npPJAN5MvJk

Notice that he's staring at her ass the whole time she's talking and what's he doing with his wedding ring? I bet he can't wait to take it off.

When does McCain's lechery become a campaign issue? He's willing to risk the country's future on a beauty queen, just like he wrecked his first marriage for a beauty queen.
posted by empath at 6:16 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.
They're already saying that Palin is "more experienced" than Obama, because it's executive experience

Thank goodness Abraham Lincoln had those terms as Governor of Illinois to steel him for the work that lay ahead.
posted by lukemeister at 6:19 PM on August 29, 2008


It took me three quarters of the thread to realize that Feminists for Life meant, you know, anti-choice, rather than Feminists Por Vida, Feminists for LYFE.

Feminist gangsters.
posted by sugarfish at 6:20 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


McCain has a history of having affairs with women that he works with, how will his wife feel about him working long hours with a younger, more attractive, more powerful woman?

Right, because obviously Palin has no agency in that hypothetical. Or perhaps it's just assumed that she'd be *shudder* attracted to his power, like some pretty Alaskan Anakin Skywalker?!?
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 6:24 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I executively wouldn't hit it
posted by uandt at 6:25 PM on August 29, 2008


good point! i'm just throwin' stuff up the flagpole to see what sticks. I'm sure someone will come up with a better variation of that before long, though.
posted by empath at 6:27 PM on August 29, 2008


He is an adulterer and a lech, though.
posted by empath at 6:28 PM on August 29, 2008


STOP MAKING ME PICTURE JOHN MCCAIN GETTING FREAKY.
posted by ColdChef at 6:33 PM on August 29, 2008 [6 favorites]


As rokusan pointed out about 400 comments ago: McCain Taps Alaska Gov. Palin

(Nothing in the article, just the title of course...)
posted by XMLicious at 6:35 PM on August 29, 2008


hydrophonic, quoting someone else: "Call your local OB department and ask what to do if you think that your water has broken. You’ll be advised to seek an immediate hands-on examination by an obstetrician. The baby will be placed on a monitor to make sure it’s OK."

Eh? No, that's not true. You've got 24 hours to get the kid out after the water breaks before anyone panics, unless there's something else going on. Monitors are standard with hospital births -- they're not indicative of things going pear-shaped.
posted by The corpse in the library at 6:41 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


onlyconnect: Re: gov'r of Alaska. First of all, Alaska is an incredibly homogeneous state -- overwhelmingly white, mostly male, one-party Republican rule -- and that pushes poll numbers toward the extremes. Thus, her approval ratings have to be taken with a grain of salt; governors like Schweitzer, Napolitano, and Sebelius who maintain very high approval ratings while governing as a minority-party governor are the ones whose high approval ratings are truly remarkable. Also, the article you link to is more than a year out of date. While Palin indeed had a 90%+ approval rating early this year, her ethics scandal and her controversial pipeline plan have combined to send her poll numbers into freefall the past months. The latest Rasmussen (8/29/08) pegs her at 67% -- a 25% drop in months, faster than even Bush's approval rating loss and more importantly, a continuous drop with no sign of bottoming out, let alone reversing. Had she not been picked for VP, it's quite likely her approval would've continue to fall below 50% since both of her scandals are still are ongoing, and a number of other Alaskan officials (most notably Sen. Stevens) are also suffering scandals of their own, dropping Republican party support across the board. (This is why Obama has been making a serious play for Alaska recently -- the last six polls have McCain leading by just an average of 5.9 points, an unheard of margin in such a solidly red state.) The timing of her precipitous fall in popularity was one major factor in her being written off as a viable VP candidate months ago.

Another issue: executive experience as gov'r of Alaska. Alaska has a statewide population of just two-thirds of a million people; New York City has a population of more than ten times that just by itself. Alaska's tax code and bureaucracy is greatly simplified by, again, the dominance of just a few industries (again, look at their income tax system as an example). Titles like "governor" and "mayor" aside, there's no doubt that candidates like "merely mayor" Guiliani have far more executive experience from an financial, organizational, and human-resources perspective, nevermind other governors like Romney and Pawlenty. If you're saying that Palin was picked because of her governorship of Alaska gives her an executive edge over the other contenders, I submit that you're nuts -- and I don't think you're hinging it all on her governorship. On that front, there are tons of stronger mayors, governors, CEOs, you name it with stronger executive records.

Her reputation as a reformer? Her ethics scandal, plummeting popularity, and Alaska's growing notoriety as a haven of Republican corruption have severely undermined that. It was thought to be too risky to tap her while some new development in Alaska could severely undermine the ticket; there are plenty of other GOP reformers like Jindal, DeMint, etc. if McCain were interested in a purely reform angle.

In fact that's what it boils down to. No matter what you're looking for in terms of resume and experience, there are better candidates. Virtually all the alternatives have a better executive resume, and most are stronger in various other areas as well. In fact, just looking at the women thought to be among the finalists: Fiorina has a far superior executive/economic/Washington-outsider background as a female Romney alternative, and Hutchinson is much stronger from a political qualifications and social issues perspective if McCain's primary goal were to shore up evangelical support. And that's ignoring the other female contenders like Dole that were eliminated early on alongside Palin. Looking at male contenders included, and we're talking about well over a dozen, probably two dozen more names here, and many of them do a better job of "covering all the bases" on the resume/experience question than Palin. In short, Palin was not chosen simply based on her resume and experiences.

"Not a single one of these qualities or accomplishments are dependant on her age, gender, or photogenic appearance, but perhaps they are all things that you think it is appropriate to scoff at. But go ahead and continue to believe that McCain picked her because she is a pretty, pretty princess. [...] You're still not getting it."

No, you're still not getting it. Palin isn't being dismissed just because she's a pretty, pretty princess; she's being dismissed because she was widely thought to have already been eliminated looking at purely the "paper qualifications", and given all the other choices at McCain's disposal, the only plausible reason remaining excludes resume and experience as the determining factors. Even though she checks all the necessary boxes -- a minimum of executive experience, pro-life, non-establishment, etc. -- just like many other more qualified candidates, the overwhelming consensus among those criticizing the choice is that she was chosen because she was "New and Different" as a counter to Obama's "New and Different." And in this case the derision comes from New and Different being -- in this case -- rather blatantly being young, female, and photogenic. I'm not scoffing at her for being a "pretty, pretty princess." If you look at my actual words, I was scoffing at what was "instrumental to her selection" -- that is to say, the cynicism behind the McCain camp's choice that this was more important than purely the various executive, reformer, outsider, social issues, etc criteria, when weighed against the other contenders.

You're tilting at conjured windmills constructed by strawmen here. I'm trying to describe why this was such a surprise pick, to choose someone widely considered eliminated months ago and the McCain camp's rationale for doing so when compared against the remaining field (if you don't believe me, search the news archives at various sites following the veepstakes and follow the evolution of names and the pros and cons being weighed for months; there's a reason why everyone thought it was down to a handful like Romney and Pawlenty this past weekend). You're acting as if I were taking an opportunistic jab at her as unqualified because she's merely a "pretty, pretty princess", and frankly that's a myopic and knee-jerk assessment. This is the last, surprising chapter of a process that's gone on for months, and you can't really describe why Palin is a surprise pick without looking at the timeline and the reasons behind her being listed, being dropped from mentioning, and now her sudden resurfacing in the Republican veepstakes.

Or you can believe that Palin was chosen because her record as a reformer was so strong, her governorship experience so remarkable, and her social credentials so morally pack-leading that it's actually a complete coincidence that she happens to be a "pretty, pretty princess." Personally, I think that's a flat-out wrong assessment. And it's not just me: while the GOP-win-go-win and the social conservative (NO RIDGE/LIEBERMAN/ROMNEY) sites are stoked and are falling in line, if you look at -- purely on the conservative sites -- the politics-as-sports horserace followers, the indy-conservative curmudgeons, the small-government libertarian-leaners, and the paleocon/old-school fiscal/isolationist Republican communities and commentators, you'll find the same criticism but in much harsher terms: "gender pandering", "tokenism", "trophy veep", and many similar assessments, laid out in arguments with far more data and more links. This isn't concern trolling to sink the Republican ticket or Palin-bashing for being a woman: this is about tracking and making sense of the radically altered trajectory of a story that has been closely followed for months. I think we'd all be interested in hearing a different, more plausible take from you -- but the argument that Palin won the pick based on just her resume and experience has far too many refutations. Setting aside the yay-GOP/yay-pro-life reactions, the aggregate reactions being tracked on both sides -- like on Kos/RedState and pundits like Ambinder/Halpern/etc -- have made the case I mentioned above pretty consistently and strongly.

And by the way, there's no double standard here when it comes to Obama. Obama's main selling pitch wasn't his resume -- he was emphasizing his judgment, his ability to lead through inspiration, his ability to turn out voters, his fund-raising, his infrastructure-building and managing the best-run campaign this primary season, etc. Bill Clinton alluded to this explicitly when he says Obama has gotten "stronger" as a candidate through the campaign. Obama been building all this since last January (and before then) to supplement the fact that his resume is thinner than most other Democratic candidates. Palin on the other hand has 60 days after the convention to make that case for herself, while acting as a newly-formed appendage shoehorned into an existing campaign framework. It's all somewhat farcical prima facie. That's why the resume and experience question for a veep is so crucial, because she won't be given the lengthy chance to prove herself as Obama has been for almost two years now. I've been seeing Palin being labeled as "Geraldine Quayle" from some on both the right and left; it'll be interesting to see if the charge sticks.

spiderwire: Clinton's statement on Palin: [...] Not exactly what DaShiv was predicting, I think.

It's the same echo of the faint praise McCain has been giving Obama for his historic nomination. After the GOP convention the campaign starts in earnest, and I'll be shocked if Sen. Clinton doesn't make some substantive attacks against the McCain/Palin ticket between now and November, especially on the issues of choice and health care. The real questions are how and how hard, because she's not going to just phone this one in. There are simply too many people watching her, especially after the Palin pick.
posted by DaShiv at 6:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [71 favorites]


I'm not a woman, though I enjoy doing a lot of things women do, but I'm curious as to whether this will, over time, be seen more as an insult to their sex. The Republicans are basically saying that yeah, when backed into a corner they'll go as far as putting a woman on the ticket, but only in second place. You can't take seriously that they appreciate her qualifications considering this is the first time they have been considered worth mention. Her name was never discussed for presidential nomination, though the qualifications are ostensibly the same. And then they're playing up the motherhood/Down's syndrome thing to draw in the Lifetime-movie-of-the-week crowd. I wouldn't say that this is how Republicans in general view women, but they shouldn't go as far as to brag that how they have gone about this is in any way complimentary.
posted by troybob at 6:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


You know, reading all the comments in regards to abortion, it seems very few ever address the simple pragmatic aspects of abortion being legal. In countries where abortion is illegal, the number of abortions per capita is not any less than in those countries where it is legal. What changes when it goes from legal to illegal is the number of *unsafe* abortions increases, while the number of abortions themselves remains more or less the same. In other words, when abortion is a crime the number of dead teenagers increases. That's it. So being 'pro-life' is an irony until itself, in that the goal of people who use that term to describe themselves, if ever (re)fulfilled, would result in an increased number of deaths -- of actual people, not clumps of fetal tissue. To be pragmatically accurate, the term should be something like 'pro-more-dead-young-people-unnecessarily'.
posted by jamstigator at 6:42 PM on August 29, 2008 [29 favorites]


...'unto itself'. I suck tonight. Pass the bong. ;)
posted by jamstigator at 6:46 PM on August 29, 2008


Let's see what happens. I think this is a very stupid pick. Once the bloom is off and her very serious ethical problems, total lack of foreign policy opinions (not experience, opinions) and the basely insulting nature of the pick are well aired, I think she'll live on in history as a punchline.

I'd lay money on it.
posted by Bookhouse at 6:50 PM on August 29, 2008


Imagine this scenario:

Clinton edges out Obama in a close fought primary race, leaving african americans bitter and dejected. McCain, seeing an opportunity to placate his Christianist base and to draw in alienated blacks nominates:

Alan Keyes.

Does anybody think black people would fall for that? Why would women democrats fall for this bamboozle?
posted by empath at 6:50 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


"Let's suppose that that phone rings at 3am in the morning and either Joe Biden or Sarah Palin has to answer it. You tell me," continued Cafferty. "After this pick, ask yourself again who has the better judgment, John McCain or Barack Obama."
posted by lukemeister at 6:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


This certainly puts the abortion issue back in play, which should boil away the mushy middle and leave us the starkly split electorate we've had in recent past.

Are today's younger people, ie. <4>really anti-choice? I should think most Americans are actually pretty much "meh" about the issue: no one actually wants abortion to be used, but most everyone pretty much understands it's a necessary option.

A vehemently vocal anti-choice candidate would, I should think, be a liability.

That, or the USA is way more bass-ackwards than I thought.
posted by five fresh fish at 7:05 PM on August 29, 2008


Does anybody think black people would fall for that? Why would women democrats fall for this bamboozle?

Well, hang on, meow. Alan Keyes is recognizably batshitinsane. Palin, for whatever faults she may have, so far has not exhibited anything akin to Alan Keyes.
posted by cavalier at 7:08 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Am I too late to the thread to discuss the incredibly odd rumor that the new kid may not be hers at all, but her daughter's?
posted by The Bellman at 7:08 PM on August 29, 2008


That, or the USA is way more bass-ackwards than I thought.

Not just more ass-backwards than you think, but more ass-backwards than you can imagine.
posted by a robot made out of meat at 7:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


how will his wife feel about him working long hours with a younger, more attractive, more powerful woman?

Seriously, when's the last time a president actually worked long hours with a veep? The current administration doesn't count seeing as this President works for, not with, the Vice-President. Vice-Presidents exist to attend foreign state funerals and break ties in the Senate, anything over and above that only occurs in exceptional circumstances.
posted by MikeMc at 7:11 PM on August 29, 2008


"Here under protest is mooseburgers." -Orson Wells
posted by moonbird at 7:13 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


"She may be pretty. She may be stupid. The two are NOT connected."

No, but it does strongly correlate with being shallow. Which doesn't correlate well with governing.
posted by klangklangston at 7:14 PM on August 29, 2008


You know, it's funny. Here is where I first saw the Plin news,and it didn't even occur to me to check the mainstream media's reaction. I looked here, and on reddit and fark and dailykos, and on a few other blogs.

One of my hopes for this election is that it turns out there is a great, previously-unacknowledged citizenry of internet-connected wonks who get off their asses and vote for common sense. I mean, come on people, Palin is a damned creationist! Even the Pope doesn't believe that shit any more. How vastly ignorant is she?
posted by five fresh fish at 7:14 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Bellman: "Am I too late to the thread to discuss the incredibly odd rumor that the new kid may not be hers at all, but her daughter's?"

Not at all. What an excellent rumor.
posted by The corpse in the library at 7:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


I confess, I have been pondering Harriet Miers for much of today.

Palin is used to knock Obama out of the headlines. She campaigns for a couple of weeks, gets the base worked up about pro-life issues, and then realizes that the campaign is too hard on her family and regretfully drops out to return to Alaska. McCain then picks Romney or some other more liberal VP with tons of experience and finishes the campaign with an added "feel bad for the Republicans because they lost their VP" boost.

/tinfoil
posted by Joey Michaels at 7:16 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


The Post's James Grimaldi got an exclusive interview with Walter Monegan, the canned Alaska Public Safety Commissioner at the center of Palin trooper-gate scandal. And he basically says Palin is lying in her assertion that while some of her aides contacting Monegan about firing her brother-in-law, that she herself did not.

How could the republicans miss this? It may be minor, it may not, but in the echo chamber of presidential politics even the most minor thing can get blown way out of proportion, just look at Obama's "land deal" with Rezko, a tiny issue that wouldn't even merit a senate ethics inquiry is showing up in T.V. ads.
Just chiming in here with those who said that abortion will be one of the central themes of this election -- except that it will probably be embedded into a broader theme. Something like 'family values' or 'American values'.

This is bad news for Obama: He will try to tip-toe around the issue, giving non-committal statements, whereas the other camp will just state their opinion straightforwardly. Straight-talk indeed. -- sour cream
Are you kidding? Did you actually watch the democratic convention? Democrats talk constantly about the need to protect Roe, about how the republicans are going to take it away, etc. Meanwhile the republicans tiptoe around it, talking about 'judicial appointments' and 'strict constructionists' when what they mean is they'll nominate judges who will overturn Roe v. Wade

Anyway, poll after poll shows that most Americans favor legalized abortion. It isn't a winning issue for the republicans, but it helps to motivate their base.
posted by delmoi at 7:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


You, yourself, say that she is participating in a system that is anti-feminist and that itself is worthy of scorn. So, you, as a feminist feel that beauty pageants are awful. Great. Don't participate in them! It doesn't strike me as very "feminist" to me to hear the message "You can be pretty, or you can be smart, but you can't be both!"

Look, all I'm trying to say at the end of the day is that she can do whatever the heck she wants to, but I don't feel she represents me if she does something I disagree with. Maybe if someone is really anti-drugs they won't vote for a person who has done drugs to represent them, even if that doesn't have a lot to do with running a country. That's their prerogative.

I don't think that's such a novel point. And I think you've been unfairly characterizing my argument as a series of strawmen re: what I feel about attractive people, who can be pretty, who can wear makeup.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 7:18 PM on August 29, 2008


(and really, the scare quotes around feminist were unnecessary to say the least.)
posted by Solon and Thanks at 7:20 PM on August 29, 2008



I'm not a woman, though I enjoy doing a lot of things women do, but I'm curious as to whether this will, over time, be seen more as an insult to their sex.


I am a woman, I voted for Hillary on Super Tuesday, I had a grudging respect for the more centrist, "party maverick" McCain during the 2000 race--and let me tell you, Palin excites me and makes me feel all warm and proud inside the way the African American community *hearts* Alan Keyes during his presidential bids.

In this particular race, at this particular moment in time, I wouldn't jump party lines for anything, just like I held my nose and voted for Kerry in 2004. But I would have had much more respect for McCain--and less fear about a McCain ticket winning the Oval Office--if he had chosen Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Mitt Romney, anyone else. You can't pander to me like that ("but she's got boobs and a uterus! what more do you broads want?"). I have a hard time believing that even the most embittered PUMA would sign off on someone even further right than McCain on women's issues, gay rights, and environmental concerns, just because she's a chick.

Please.
posted by availablelight at 7:21 PM on August 29, 2008 [7 favorites]


She's a model Republican feminist: Make the most of yourself by selling yourself however you can, then do whatever you want - buy houses, humvees, hookers, blow and lawyers, make babies, wars, gorgeous new McMansions with granite, whatever you like. The world is your oyster and consequences are for someone else, someone who'll be eating your dust come the Rapture.
posted by Ambrosia Voyeur at 7:22 PM on August 29, 2008 [16 favorites]


The thing about the pregnancy is very weird and kind of plausible. I've seen it on some dkos diaries and newsgroups, but nothing legit yet. It does seem weird that at 7 months, she wasn't showing at all, and that when she did have the kid, her water broke at a conference and she flew all the way back to alaska to deliver it?

If her daughter really did miss all that school from 'mono' at the same time, it's quite a plausible scenario to me. Are there any pictures of a pregnant Palin from this time period? I found a pic of her at 7 months, where she doesn't look slightly pregnant.

Random person from google image search for 7 months pregnant.

Sarah Palin, supposedly 7 months pregnant.
posted by empath at 7:23 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


All right, this rumor re: covering up for her pregnant daughter is discussed here among other places. It is, of course, a rumor and there aren't really any non-bulletin board sources that suggest that it might be true.
posted by Joey Michaels at 7:23 PM on August 29, 2008


Have the GOP backroom power brokers thought this through? I wish no poor health to McCain, but what if there's a William Henry Harrison situation and McCain after a month in office checks out?

Back in 2000, people on both sides of the aisle that questioned Bush's qualifications said relax, Dick Cheney will be around to counsel. Jokes aside about Cheney being a puppet master, Cheney has made the office of the VP quite powerful (Gore started it, before that VPs waited around for the president to die, attended second tier country's state funerals, coronations and other shit the president didn't want or have time to do). So if McCain checks out, who will Palin go to for counsel? A yet-to-be-named member of the cabinet? Or will Cheney still be around from an undisclosed location. I'm not saying that Palin isn't intelligent and able to think on her feet, but running the country is a hell of a lot different than running a state with 600K people. A state where the second largest private employer is Safeway. Not trying to knock Alaska but really?

I really thought the bombshell McCain was going to drop today was saying Condi Rice was getting the nod. She has credentials. She's ready for the 3am call (and gets it more often that W does already). Or even Kay Bailey Hutchison (a complete hack, but still way more qualified). If McCain and the strategy guys wanted a woman to "diversify" and show the the GOP is down with change too, there are thousands of more qualified women around. All of them would tow the GOP line. And of course, it doesn't even have to be a woman!

John McCain has lost his mind! He is saying that of all 300+ million of us, he is the qualified to run the country. And his first big decision is saying Sarah Palin is his VP? Really?
posted by birdherder at 7:35 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?
"Party Unity, My Ass!" It refers to Hillary supporters who don't want to support Obama because they hold a grudge about how Hillary was treated.
No. It refers to a Republican-funded disinformation campaign.
posted by five fresh fish at 7:36 PM on August 29, 2008 [13 favorites]


you can believe that Palin was chosen because her record as a reformer was so strong

apparently, according to brooks' people fwiw, she was picked because:
what he saw when he looked at her, according to the people I spoke to, is someone who fights the same fights I fight. The first gateway sort of fight that he thought they have in common was the bridge to nowhere. He's been talking about that for years. She's the one who killed it...

The second thing he liked was she took on the Republican Party. She had a corrupt Republican Party. It was her own party. She took it on in a very risky way. McCain sort of sometimes sees himself in that role, Jack Abramoff.

And the third thing was the fight she had with the oil companies over the pipeline, which was a big fight. And he saw her -- he goes after Boeing, she goes after the oil companies.

So he said, "This is someone who's like me." I mean, I'm sure he appreciated that she's a woman and all the differences. But the essential thing was a reformer like me, even though he doesn't know her that well.
a minimum of executive experience

in the other segment on the newshour, i thought this was kind of telling:
"The other thing you have to remember is Alaska is in a period of affluence now. The state treasury is filled with money. The high oil prices the rest of the country are paying has made the rest of us up here -- given us a full treasury, and now we don't have to worry about taxing.

"We can spend money on people and just -- we don't have to make the tough choices that you have to make where you live." -- Michael Carey, host of a weekly political program for Alaska Public Television and a columnist for the Anchorage Daily News
in part because of her windfall profits tax on oil companies & support for drilling :P altho...

and btw:
JUDY WOODRUFF: Well, how does she get along with state legislators?

[Alaska State Representative (D)] LINDSEY HOLMES: Well, I think it depends on the state legislator. There's been a bit of a hands-off approach, I would have to say. It's not...

JUDY WOODRUFF: A hands-off approach on whose...

LINDSEY HOLMES: To the legislature, from the governor's office to the legislature. There are definitely people in the legislature she just doesn't get along with at all.

JUDY WOODRUFF: Are they all Democrats?

LINDSEY HOLMES: No, actually, they're mostly Republicans, a lot of Republicans, some Democrats. It kind of depends on the issue. There have been some arguments over handling of things like budget vetoes without communicating them ahead of time to the legislature, just a lack of communication, I think, on a lot of things that we've been working on.
cheers!
posted by kliuless at 7:40 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin, supposedly 7 months pregnant.

It would help if you linked to the article where the photo appeared.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 7:41 PM on August 29, 2008


This photo is undated, but might have fed some of the rumors.

Although:

Many teen aged girls have little "pooches" on otherwise slim bodies, and all sorts of women carry differently when pregnant (very thin women, very tall women, and very overweight women can even have babies without realizing they're pregnant until the actual delivery pains).
posted by availablelight at 7:41 PM on August 29, 2008


Her much-blogged-about "whiner" comment, captured here on video, happened the day before she announced she was 7 months pregnant. I can see why the reporter was surprised to later learn the news.
posted by mothershock at 7:55 PM on August 29, 2008


Um, and it's not about me "feeling good". If you've got a good argument for why Clinton won't campaign harder, say so. I'm not making stuff up to post here in order to "feel good".

And what was the good argument that Hilary would campaign harder? That Palin is a republican?
posted by JohnnyGunn at 7:55 PM on August 29, 2008


That is a deliciously nasty rumor and a correspondingly terrific rationalization. Like someone posted above, the next few months are going to be interesting!
posted by sfts2 at 7:57 PM on August 29, 2008


Huh. I thought birth certificates were public records, but I was wrong. In Alaska, there's a hundred-year wait.
posted by Bookhouse at 7:58 PM on August 29, 2008


And what was the good argument that Hilary would campaign harder? That Palin is a republican?

DaShiv, upthread, gave quite a good rundown I think.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 8:03 PM on August 29, 2008


While dashiv is verbose, I don't think he's particularly intelligent on this. Anyone can go on blah blah blah without really saying anything. Just watch cable news some time.

I've been following this and have been perplexed at the choice. The best answer I've heard for her selection is that she represents a next generation of conservative that's the next step from the Reagan Republican. Ever so slightly more progressive on various issues, but supposedly still fiscally and socially conservative. It's a symbolic transition from McCain as an old-school (though he supposedly never was) conservative.

I think the Republican ticket looks a bit confused right now, and I imagine they'll try to focus themselves at their convention. They do have their work cut out for them, but the choice was intelligent as far as taking the news wind out of the sail of the democrats. Thing is 38 million people watched Obama's speech on TV, and who knows how many online. It's available to watch anytime anyone wants. I don't see McCain matching the rhetoric or the presentation of Obama, and they'll have to fall back on their perky "hockey mom" who is under investigation. Her choice is an incredible long shot, but I think if Obama's organization maintains their discipline, it'll end up being a negative. I expect to see Palin fade to obscurity after this election cycle.
posted by Eekacat at 8:03 PM on August 29, 2008


I was a little surprised to see, right over McCain's shoulder when he made the announcement about Palin, was Geoff Davis, the Kentucky congressman who called Obama "boy" just a few months ago. Was that a whistle only dogs can hear?
posted by tizzie at 8:10 PM on August 29, 2008


And he saw her -- he goes after Boeing, she goes after the oil companies.

No, he goes after Boeing because all his campaign advisors used to lobby for Lockheed, EADS, and McDonnell-Douglas.

This election is such a joke.
posted by spiderwire at 8:11 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


I have been pondering Harriet Miers

fallows, fwiw, thinks she's more clarence thomas :P "an unbelievably obvious but potentially effective attempt to jiu-jitsu the standard identity politics of the moment in a way that flummoxes the Democrats," but citing brooks again, i'll entertain the idea that it's a genuine effort to take the party in a new direction:
she is an under-45 Republican. That means she's unwedded to Reaganism. She's Evangelical, but she's pretty progressive on gay and lesbian issues. She's for drilling in ANWR, but she talks about global warming quite a lot.

She's got different categories in her head than, I think, the older conservatives who are pretty much down the line ideologically.
that's the hope anyway!
posted by kliuless at 8:11 PM on August 29, 2008


Google reveals that I am not alone in thinking that McCain was checking out her ass.

What scares me is the sneaking suspicion that McCain was "thinking with his dick" when he made his vice presidential pick.
posted by jonp72 at 8:11 PM on August 29, 2008


Well I think that for now the rumor about it being her daughter's kid is confined to the truly insane lefty sources, but if it does turn out to be the real thing it's going to be a lot more interesting than her flip-flop on the Bridge to Nowhere.
posted by The Bellman at 8:22 PM on August 29, 2008


This election is such a joke.

They all are, sadly.
posted by a3matrix at 8:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


ColdChef: "STOP MAKING ME PICTURE JOHN MCCAIN GETTING FREAKY."

Why? Sex sells.
posted by Rhaomi at 8:27 PM on August 29, 2008


I told myself I wouldn't post on this thread, but I do think I should point out that the incidence of Down syndrome in kids of teen moms is really low, which argues against the crazy rumor.
posted by escabeche at 8:33 PM on August 29, 2008


Once the dwarfs accepted an easy path. Discovering it copied, a spew of hypocrisy enveloped the spheroid, great inconsequential masses paddled against the current.

Same as it ever was.
posted by Mblue at 8:38 PM on August 29, 2008


All this "what if she gets preggers?" talk sounds like some serious false flag bullshit to me.

I don't know, considering her personal history (and not just the case of any woman in office having any baby, ever) I would really question her decision to have another child.

If it were me? I'd consider that at 44 nature (or God, etc) has already given me a big fucking clue-by-four that I'm too old to have any more children, due to the lamentable but completely predictable trisomy 21 issue with the most recent child. I'd consider that with 5 other children requiring their allotted attention from me, and the youngest being a Downs baby requiring even more than a normal baby would, that a sixth child would necessarily cut into that already-limited mom time that they get, and that's not really fair to them. And I'd consider that elected office, *especially* something at the highest national level being an incredibly demanding career, that I'd be stretched too thin and struggle to give both my job and my family the attention that they deserve (yes it's a difficult balance with 5 but I think a 6th would take even more time away from work).

Personally I'd hope that at the highest levels women would have their childbearing years behind them, at least. There are just too many complications - how would she be perceived by other world leaders? What if she went into labor at an inopportune time? What about the complication of trying to make everyone understand her breastfeeding for two years (what every kid deserves, at the least, imho)? That's an uphill battle right there. In today's politics it is just a bridge too far, I'm afraid. There are too many traditionally-minded people who will think she should be at home, and that will detract from her electability and effectiveness.

You don't need to know the sex of your child (and I'd hope no-one out there is getting abortions based on the sex of their foetus) but it's something people like to find out. Now that the technology exists, why not find out about genetic conditions your child will have as well?

Unfortunately in other places in the world people abort female fetuses (solely because they are female) in vast numbers, I'm afraid. Personally I think keeping it a surprise is more fun, which is something I am glad I did with my kid.

And the genetic testing? It can cause miscarriage. It is a not-insignificant risk. "Your baby was perfectly healthy. Sorry that you lost it due to a complication from the amnio." It's a nightmare scenario to be sure but the risk is real, and lots of people won't chance it unless they have a serious reason to suspect abnormality. And other types of tests which may be less risky can have a high false-positive rate which only causes extreme worry about something that is likely to be just fine.
posted by marble at 8:39 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


One should mention that The Daily Show has done a kick-ass job of reporting on the Convention and have made so much fun of Obama that all Republicans should be watching. "Every time Obama speaks, an angel has an orgasm." They're ripping on him.
posted by five fresh fish at 8:39 PM on August 29, 2008


five fresh fish, I totally forgot to mention that! Thursday's show in particular was excellent. The segment on Biden's speech was particularly good. I think a democratic president would be a godsend for their comedy, though some people suggest otherwise.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 8:44 PM on August 29, 2008


I'm going to steal from Joe Conason, who steals from a prominent conservative in this piece:

Looking back on the Ferraro nomination, another well-known conservative wrote: "I believe that someday we are going to have a woman president, possibly during my life, and I've often thought the best way to pave the way for this was to first nominate and elect a woman as vice-president. But I think Mondale made a serious mistake when he picked Geraldine Ferraro as his running mate. In my view, he guessed wrong in deciding to take a congresswoman that almost nobody had ever heard of and try to put her in line for the presidency ... I don't know who among the Democrats might have been a better choice, but it was obvious Mondale picked Geraldine Ferraro simply because he believed there was a 'gender gap' where I was concerned and she was a woman."

Those are the words of Ronald Reagan in his 1991 memoir, "An American Life," pouring scorn on the nomination of a woman who had served six years in Congress working on foreign policy issues. In retrospect, he had a point. Only this Palin gambit could make the Ferraro mistake look responsible and wise.

posted by Cool Papa Bell at 8:44 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


five fresh fish: "One should mention that The Daily Show has done a kick-ass job of reporting on the Convention and have made so much fun of Obama that all Republicans should be watching. "Every time Obama speaks, an angel has an orgasm." They're ripping on him."

Oh, absolutely. Here's the clip, for anyone who missed it.
posted by Rhaomi at 8:45 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


At 820 comments, I'm clearly late to the game here, but, you know.

I was at the rally this morning in Dayton when the announcement was made - begrudgingly, because I'm probably going to vote for Obama, but my mom wanted me to go, and it's half a mile from where I live, so, I went. And now I'm glad I did.

I really do think, despite her lack of experience, it'll help McCain. I'll tell you that in her speech she came off as incredibly capable and strong, but also very down-to-earth and genuine at the same time. She was immediately likeable in both personality and the way they described her life, and I really think that's what McCain needs right now.

My mom and at least 3 of my friends came away saying "Wow, I really like her! Wow, they've definetely got my vote!" Of course my data points don't prove anything, but all the conservative-leaning people I know (and I know a bunch) definetely think Obama is the essence of evil, and would probably vote for Mccain, except that they're not convinced he's in touch with the needs and wants of America at large, because he's 72, etc. Now that's he's picked a woman that they "really like", they'll definetely vote for him.

The bottom line is that the bulk of America, especially the bulk of conservative America, isn't going to vote for who they're going to vote for because they look long and hard at voting records and experience - they're going to say "Wow, I really like her! She's got 5 kids! Her son's in the military!" and that will be the end of it.

All in all I still don't think it will be enough to push McCain ahead of Obama in November. But I do think it was a smart decision on his part. The crowd went nuts for her this morning.
posted by Quidam at 8:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


Personally I'd hope that at the highest levels women would have their childbearing years behind them, at least. There are just too many complications - how would she be perceived by other world leaders? What if she went into labor at an inopportune time? What about the complication of trying to make everyone understand her breastfeeding for two years (what every kid deserves, at the least, imho)? That's an uphill battle right there. In today's politics it is just a bridge too far, I'm afraid. There are too many traditionally-minded people who will think she should be at home, and that will detract from her electability and effectiveness.

Regarding parenting, I don't see how that would be any different than what a male VP with a child-bearing wife would have to go through - the amount of care involved, the time and energy of parenting so many kids. Should we object to any parent of a child with Down's Syndrome, a parent with multiple children, or both, from holding public office, or just the mothers? I also don't see how the physical aspects of pregnancy themselves would interfere with carrying out the duties of the office of the vice presidency.

Also, the same "traditional-minded" people who would object to a woman in the work place are the same people who will probably be able to overlook her not abiding her wifely place in the household if it means keeping Obama out of the White House.

For these reasons, and because I doubt a party that wants to retain women voters is going to try any strategy that involves Pailn's reproductive system, I seriously doubt there's going to be much of this coming from the Democratic side.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


I too would hope that our highest elected officials were pretty much past their child bearing years, male or female. You want someone who has a bit more time to devote.
posted by gjc at 8:59 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


A great line:

We can't take four more years of this.

If McCain lives, it's going to be four more years of this. If McCain dies, the powers behind the administration will manipulate the naïf into delivering the same. It's not even a coded message: it's plain as day. This is an election between what has been, and a shot at making things what they should be.

I don't think the nation can survive another four years of following the gang who have hijacked the Republican party. This is not the America the Americans want. This is not the America Americans deserve.

Hell, if you're Republican, you should be voting for Obama so that you can spend four years reclaiming your party and be able to run a candidate of your own choosing, who must surely be a better man than McCain.

frankly, I think this is the last chance you have for reclaiming your party. If McCain is really the best you got, then your next government will effectively be your last. It'll be a gang-operated office forever.
posted by five fresh fish at 9:06 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


This was a crazy and stupid pick but as we've seen for the past eight years, Americans love crazy and stupid.
posted by effwerd at 9:12 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


comments about her reproductive choices are just completely out of bounds, and ironic to boot, at least from liberals.

buuuut - i feel pretty superficial at the moment so i'll just echo illiad, above. dana perino was *hot* - and i must say, guiltily, that her repulsive prevaricating somehow made her hotter.

palin is an average, normal-looking white woman. she has good skin and teeth, and she wears her hair with confidence, but she's an average-looking person, just like everybody else walking down the street.
posted by facetious at 9:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Let's not do any creepy analysis of teenager's bodies looking for baby bumps, ok?
posted by garlic at 9:15 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


If McCain wins, Palin's going to have a hell of a time being both President and the nursing mother of a newborn. She'd have all my support were she to choose to be a good mother. At the same time, there is going to be one hell of a mess on her hands, a country crippled. And if she fails at managing that mess, Hilary will never be President. Hmmmm....
posted by five fresh fish at 9:16 PM on August 29, 2008


We had a similar situation in Canada a few years ago involving a woman named Belinda Stronach, a good-looking woman from a monied family who had nothing else going for her. She'd never even been able to finish university, and her career had consisted of holding a series of ill-defined jobs within her father's companies - it wasn't ever clear exactly what she had done. When asked in an interview to name one important decision she had made as director of the Magna Corporation she was unable to do so. Thank heavens, despite the heavy backing of a wealthy, successful and well-connected father she didn't get far. She became an MP, but when she ran for Conservative party leader she lost. Then she "crossed the floor" to become a member of the then in-power Liberal party in return for a Cabinet portfolio, but the Liberals proceeded to promptly lose the next election to the Conservatives. I didn't like it that Stephen Harper won, but damn that particular consequence was satisfying and hilarious for me at least.

A columnist for the Globe and Mail commented at the time that choosing a physically attractive yet grossly unqualified woman for important political positions like that of Cabinet minister is a slap in the face for qualified women everywhere, and I quite agree. I'd predict that Palin will fall flat on her face shortly, but there's another dimension to this that did not exist in the whole Belinda Stronach fiasco and that frightens me.

There are so MANY Americans who will vote for anyone who is pro-life, pro-creationism, will keep the queers in line, and looks like a good person with whom to have a beer (or in this case, a date). It just sickens me that anyone can be so unthinking and so irresponsible to use such incredibly bad criteria for making a vote. And I wouldn't care if we were talking about some banana or potato republic and the consequences could mainly rest on the voters' own heads, but we're talking about the most powerful country in the world. Haven't Americans had enough of idiots driving the elephant?
posted by orange swan at 9:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [12 favorites]


Governor Palin Visits troops.
posted by garlic at 9:19 PM on August 29, 2008


True, the salmon fishin' snow runnin' ex-beauty queen reformist conservative ardent pro-lifer whose water broke when performing her governmental duties was, I'm guessing, from Season Four or so, but I can't quite pin down the episode, which bothers me.

Anyway, Northern Exposure sucked once the Fleischman character left. There was just no tension anymore.
posted by darth_tedious at 9:25 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


.
posted by mazola at 9:28 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Anyway, Northern Exposure sucked once the Fleischman character left.

And that disc jockey who talkedtalkedtalkedtalkedtaaalked. Really don't miss that.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 9:30 PM on August 29, 2008


Lies, damn lies & statistics. "most popular governor", means: she has the highest approval (recognition) rating in her own state. That's Alaska, which is like a small town the size of Texas. I've met schoolteachers in Alaska who knew families from darn near every small village all over the state.

So... Please. If she was "the most popular governor in America", then there wouldn't be all these headlines saying "who?". Honestly, I couldn't even think of her name on the way home after we'd been talking about her @ work all day. Look away from the screen(s) in front of you right now. Say her name.

I'm in California. We have the most popular governor in the world.

Please.

posted by Lukenlogs at 9:34 PM on August 29, 2008


i'm beginning to wonder something - is it possible that palin got the nod because mccain asked several other people and they all said no?
posted by pyramid termite at 9:46 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


You called it. Gotta be.
posted by jettloe at 9:56 PM on August 29, 2008


Women have abortions when they have 'stupid sex' with men who won't use condoms.

Bullshit. Pregnancy does occur when birth control fails (I AM pro-choice).

Looks like a pretty naked attempt to go after the Ellen Jamesian Society vote

My favorite lines from The World According to Garp were:

My name is Ellen James. I am NOT an Ellen Jamesian.
posted by brujita at 9:56 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


Worth repeating, IMO:

They call her husband, the reigning champion in the annual Iron Dog snowmachine race, First Dude.

Also, can we just talk about this picture of her office in Anchorage?
posted by Quidam at 10:00 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


MikeMc: If Palin is a "Young Earth" Creationist is she really that far from other Christians many, if not most, of whom believe the Bible is the Divine Word of God?

Response:
In a thread full of allegations of sexism, this has to be the most culturally ignorant thing said here so far. posted by mkultra at 12:02 PM on August 29 [5 favorites +]


Being culturally ignorant about religious stupidity is refreshing to me. I dismiss those who pretend to understand it, and especially those who deem it normal.
posted by Brian B. at 10:00 PM on August 29, 2008


Even without getting into the sexist notion of the younger woman being handed her position due to her attractiveness (and I scoff at any commentator who suggests with a straight face that Palin's resume and qualifications were more instrumental to her selection than the demographic appeal stemming largely from her age, gender, and photogenic appearance)

Can you retire this canard already? It's about as relevant as pointing out that Senator Clinton's "resume and qualifications were more instrumental" to her professional career than the fact that she was married for years to the governor of a corrupt Southern state who became President. Maybe both points are true, but, really, we're going to try to separate objective qualifications and resume points from looks or personal relations now? I mean, do you think that you earned all the favorites to these posts and got none of them because you happen to take great pictures?
posted by Slap Factory at 10:01 PM on August 29, 2008


She's for drilling in ANWR, but she talks about global warming quite a lot.
This is like implying that Strom Thurmond was a stalwart civil rights activist because he spoke about black people a lot.
posted by Flunkie at 10:05 PM on August 29, 2008 [15 favorites]


I mean, do you think that you earned all the favorites to these posts and got none of them because you happen to take great pictures?

note: Help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion by focusing comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand—not at other members of the site.
posted by ColdChef at 10:06 PM on August 29, 2008


Personally I'd hope that at the highest levels women would have their childbearing years behind them, at least. There are just too many complications - how would she be perceived by other world leaders? What if she went into labor at an inopportune time? What about the complication of trying to make everyone understand her breastfeeding for two years (what every kid deserves, at the least, imho)? That's an uphill battle right there. In today's politics it is just a bridge too far, I'm afraid. There are too many traditionally-minded people who will think she should be at home, and that will detract from her electability and effectiveness.

WOW. Congratulations, Marble, for leaving the most sexist comment in this whole nightmare thread. I especially like the deftness of the "I'm afraid" and "too many traditionally minded people who will think she should be at home". UM THAT'S YOU. YOU ARE THE ONE SAYING THAT.
posted by moxiedoll at 10:07 PM on August 29, 2008 [10 favorites]


Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.
posted by Jahaza

Hang on, now. If you really want to pick apart what "executive experience" means, I think that her time as governor & mayor in Alaska does not compare to Biden's experience as chairman of several Senate committees.

Obama won a senate seat in a state of 12,000,000+ citizens. Alaska's population is just shy of 700,000.

Also, Biden & Obama both have law degrees, and both taught law @ universities, FWIW.
posted by Lukenlogs at 10:14 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


shhhh, Lukenlogs....don't interrupt when official taking points are being conveyed...it makes them confused, and they automatically revert to blaming everything on Bill Clinton...
posted by troybob at 10:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


WOW. Congratulations, Marble, for leaving the most sexist comment in this whole nightmare thread. I especially like the deftness of the "I'm afraid" and "too many traditionally minded people who will think she should be at home". UM THAT'S YOU. YOU ARE THE ONE SAYING THAT.

Yeah, my favorite part of this whole election cycle has been the way blatant racism and sexism are now legitimized at a meta-level by saying "You know, I don't believe this, some of my best friends are $MINORITY_GROUP, but those people over there--it's going to be a dealbreaker for them. Better stick to the safe white male candidates." There was even a poll some months back, in which a vast majority said they'd be willing to vote for a black person as president--but half of them said their neighbors wouldn't.
posted by nasreddin at 10:17 PM on August 29, 2008 [4 favorites]


My favorite part was definitely "What about the complication of trying to make everyone understand her breastfeeding for two years (what every kid deserves, at the least, imho)". Yes, how could a woman make "other people" understand the thing she is doing because they "think" she should do it? How indeed???
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 10:21 PM on August 29, 2008 [2 favorites]


corrupt Southern state

I'm going to go way out on a limb here and guess, just guess that you've never set foot in Arkansas and in fact don't know a goddamn thing about it beyond the Clintons, Mike Huckabee, Johnny Cash, and Billy Bob Thornton. Please proceed to wow me with your next comment about how uniquely (or even remarkably) corrupt Arkansas government is compared to the rest of the nation. I await your informed, balanced answer with bated breath. And no good just googling up one or two political scandals -- that can be done with any state easily. Please, please tell me how worse we are than New York and California and D.C. and Illinois and Florida and really any of the other 46 states. Feel free to throw in Puerto Rico and Guam, if you'd really like to underscore your point.
posted by middleclasstool at 10:26 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Does the VP do something from day to day?

Actually, yes. The Vice President is the presiding officer of the Senate. The duties are normally delegated to the President pro tem , but the V.P. does have the power to break a tie vote. This is only occasionally necessary, though, and it is the only time the V.P. can vote at all. Otherwise, the V.P. may only show up on special occasions such as the State of the Union address (the practice established by Thomas Jefferson). Since 1947, the V.P. is also a member of the National Security Council.

I'm surprised there are no baby boomers in this election. All the candidates were either born before 1945 or after 1960 (Obama is "technically" a baby boomer but he gives the impression of someone younger than 47). You would think this election would have baby boomers represented as they approach 60 and should be at the height of experience without being too old.

This was remarked on during the primaries and even in 2004. The boomers, as a generation, seem to be skipping the presidency. It's not like there's a shortage of them! It's especially odd when you consider that the two major party candidates both chose non-boomers to balance their tickets. They both skipped over -- in different directions, yet! -- several potential eligible boomers. It's a pretty small sample size, but I wonder what this means.
posted by dhartung at 10:44 PM on August 29, 2008


This was remarked on during the primaries and even in 2004. The boomers, as a generation, seem to be skipping the presidency.

Well, I guess they gave up the presidency, but as a result would like us to spend the rest of our lives reliving their debates from the 60/70s.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 10:54 PM on August 29, 2008 [1 favorite]


George W And Bill Clinton were both born in 1946 - doesn't that make them boomers? So yeah, the boomers skipped the Presidency, other than those 16 years.
posted by Rumple at 11:04 PM on August 29, 2008


Okay, you know, I'm aware we've moved on and this isn't the Solon show, but after thinking about it a little more I owe you, grapefruitmoon, and perhaps several other readers an apology if many are still hanging around this ridiculously long thread.

In retrospect, my argument drifted to a degree I'm not really comfortable with. I wanted to make the point that I feel it's possible to dislike Palin's involvement with pageants without intrinsically feeling that way because of sexism/without feeling that she is stupid because of it. That ended up becoming way more moralistic than it should have been and more of a "she is a bad person/feminist for doing this" rather than "this is one aspect of many that I am dubious about when viewed in combination with other things - not because I am trying to be sexist, but the opposite."

I should have been more sensitive to that fact that many people have faced arguments similar to mine, only those arguments were aimed at making people feel bad for their looks/intelligence/usage of such. I hope I didn't trod too much on anyone's feet while being caught up in the discussion.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 11:10 PM on August 29, 2008 [3 favorites]


Yes W and Clinton were both boomers. So maybe you could say they skipped the presidency this year but they certainly got their turn.

Also, I just have to comment that the "what if she gives birth while presidentin!?'" comments are pretty ridiculous.
posted by delmoi at 11:22 PM on August 29, 2008


Well, middleclasstool, I don't know anything about the government of Arkansas, but I can guess that it's no more corrupt than the Alaskan government! (See that! I diverted the derail!) Louisiana comes to mind, though. and florida, but it's arguable that they aren't 'really' Southern.
posted by kaibutsu at 11:23 PM on August 29, 2008


I couldn't believe it today when McCain picked such an inexperienced VP, so I thought I would tune in to right wing talk radio to see how they were coping with the news. Both Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity were saying what a great choice, maverick move, eminently qualified, out of the park home run, blah, blah, blah. It was the biggest fake orgasm in the history of the world. They've always hated McCain anyway.

Could you imagine how popular McCain would be if he really had acted as the maverick over the past 8 years? Picture McCain stridently battling Bush/Cheney over the lies that got us into Iraq, speaking out against torture and extraordinary rendition, defending Americans against the erosion of our Constitutional rights, condemning illegal wiretapping and ethnic profiling, and denouncing budget deficits like he once did. That would be a maverick, speaking truth to his party and earning the respect of all Americans. He would have been unstoppable. I think he discarded his principles and sold his soul over the last 8 years for a crack at the White House in 2008. THe Palin nomination is the icing on the cake.
posted by Daddy-O at 11:33 PM on August 29, 2008 [8 favorites]


Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, John McCain's surprise vice-presidential pick, is the subject of a legislative probe into claims that she abused her office by trying to get her former brother-in-law fired from his job as an Alaska state trooper.

Palin is likely to be deposed soon in the case, according to State Sen. Hollis French, who leads the state Senate's Legislative Counsel Committee.
Well, middleclasstool, I don't know anything about the government of Arkansas, but I can guess that it's no more corrupt than the Alaskan government! (See that! I diverted the derail!) Louisiana comes to mind, though. and florida, but it's arguable that they aren't 'really' Southern.

That's a pretty low bar. The Alaskan government has got to be one of the most corrupt state governments in the nation. They have two senators and one congressperson. One of the senators (Ted Stevens) is under indictment. Their congressman has hired a defense attorney and could be indicted as well. Palin came into office after defeating the incumbent governor, Frank Murkowski, in a primary, as he was under a cloud of scandal and on march 4th of this year his former chief of staff plead guilty to conspiracy.

What about Alaska's other senator, well, that would be Lisa Murkowski, franks daughter. She recently had to give back a house she purchased from a developer a deep discount, and Frank actually appointed her to fill his spot on the senate after leaving to become governer.

And now Sara Palin herself is in trouble and could be deposed soon in a legislative probe.

It's a fucking Orgy of corruption up there, man.
posted by delmoi at 11:34 PM on August 29, 2008


Solon and Thanks writes "In retrospect, my argument drifted to a degree I'm not really comfortable with. I wanted to make the point that I feel it's possible to dislike Palin's involvement with pageants without intrinsically feeling that way because of sexism/without feeling that she is stupid because of it. "

I don't think you need to apologize at all. You were pointing out that pageant participation is indicative of values. Anyone participating in any competition, beauty pageant or math decathlon, is putting time and effort into preparing for that competition. That's time and effort that could be used for other things, other things which are therefore evidentially not as valued by the cmpetitor.

Are beauty pageants less worthy of time and effort than, say, learning calculus (or French, or volunteering at a soup kitchen)? I'd argue yes, because in the case of a beauty pageant, the pay-off of all that preparation is transient and ephemeral, lasting only until the judges have judged and the make-up is washed off. Spending that same time learning calculus or French gives one a skill that lasts a lifetime and can be usefully applied in many situations. Spending that time at a soup-kitchen brightens many people's lives.

Learning to walk down a runway or apply make-up is also, I guess, a lasting skill, but it doesn't solve problems, or allow communication, or enrich others' lives; it's usefulness is pretty much limited to self-adornment. (Of course there are exceptions: the pageant winner who uses her make-up artistry to make cancer patients feel better, etc.)

So pageant participation is a window into a person's values, and it tells me that they value pageantry and presentation and ephemeral puffery over solid, substantial, lasting, meaningful uses of their time.

And I pesonally prefer substance. Especially for the position of understudy and possible successor to the highest office in the land.
posted by orthogonality at 11:47 PM on August 29, 2008 [5 favorites]


And I personally prefer substance. Especially for the position of understudy and possible successor to the highest office in the land.

Why do you hate America? *</sarky>
posted by Dipsomaniac at 11:50 PM on August 29, 2008


And that disc jockey who talkedtalkedtalkedtalkedtaaalked. Really don't miss that.

No way, Chris was one of my favorites!

It's not the thing you fling, it's the fling itself.
posted by naoko at 11:55 PM on August 29, 2008


delmoi:
Josh Marshall has been running stories on Alaskan corruption cases all. year. long. It's mind boggling just how screwed up they're government is.
posted by kaibutsu at 12:17 AM on August 30, 2008


George W And Bill Clinton were both born in 1946 - doesn't that make them boomers? So yeah, the boomers skipped the Presidency, other than those 16 years.

You know, you're right-- I forgot my facts.* What was true in 2004 was that no member of the Silent Generation had been or seemed likely to be President. The White House was held by members of the Greatest Generation (the Strauss & Howe name) from 1961 to 1993, when it skipped to Boomers with Clinton. Now, we face a choice between a Silent (11th) and a Thirteen (commonly, Generation Xer). But the Silent guy has picked an Xer as sidekick (overlooking several Boomers), while the Xer has picked another Boomer. If Obama wins, demographically, it's the Silents who will have skipped the presidency. Unless there's someone who can run in 2012 at age 71 or older. [US News, recently]

But yeah, the Boomers definitely got their chance. Sorry about that.

* In my defense, I'm having a devil of a time with my browser at the moment.
posted by dhartung at 12:59 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Ugh, I can't sleep with the absurdity. I mean, seriously:

The reasoning for why John McCain should be elected President of the United States seems to boil down to "He was a POW".

And now, to one-up that, the reasoning for why Sarah Palin should be elected Vice President of the United States seems to boil down to "She didn't have an abortion".

Seriously? Come on.
posted by Flunkie at 1:07 AM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


Are beauty pageants less worthy of time and effort than, say, learning calculus (or French, or volunteering at a soup kitchen)? I'd argue yes, because in the case of a beauty pageant, the pay-off of all that preparation is transient and ephemeral, lasting only until the judges have judged and the make-up is washed off.

Subjectively, I can't agree more. My inclinations tell me that some arts (like clothes design) are lesser, and some (like poetry) greater; but I can't offer a single objective reason outside of my own preferences why this should be so. And further, this makes no account of interdependency between disciplines - without the trite little planktons of the arts, would the greater ones still flourish? Any less labor put into honing some woman's edged beauty, and we wouldn't have Adam's Curse or half of Yeats' repertoire.
posted by kid ichorous at 1:14 AM on August 30, 2008


Palin won't last September. Mark my words. After all the political backlash that accompanies her selection, McCain will have no real choice but to drop her. Of course, he won't do it himself--she'll suddenly decide "her family needs more right now." And then he'll go with some middle-of-the-road Republican (someone perhaps with some actual experience) holding out a faint hope that his base with their nanosecond-long attention spans will come swinging back to his defense for a last-ditch rally at the 11th hour. The media will be more than accomodating by giving the "sudden, surprising" twist of events plenty of free coverage in an advertising spree before the election. They'll bring plenty of "seasoned" Republican analysists who will reassure the people that McCain just had a momentary lapse of reason, and boy isn't that gal great for taking care of her retarded son, and boy howdy does this new (white, male) fella sure round McCain out. There won't be a dry Republican eye as they gush over how "hard" the decision must have been for her, and how "brave" she was for choosing her family over politics (not like them heartless Democrats!)

At this point, that's the best thing McCain can do. Palin is not going to be the VP ticket come November. No way, no how.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 1:17 AM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


Please proceed to wow me with your next comment about how uniquely (or even remarkably) corrupt Arkansas government is compared to the rest of the nation.

Well for starters, there's the issue of how you pronounce 'Arkansas'.
posted by Ritchie at 1:22 AM on August 30, 2008


Oh, the best part of the Palin remarks is at about 23:30, when she thanks Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton. With both names the crowd desperately wants to boo and it starts that way but turns into a pro forma cheer. Delicious to imagine the cognitive dissonance in the mind of the average person in that crowd -- after years of being told to do one thing, well, now dutifully they switch to doing the other. (We have always been at war peace with Eastasia.) In fact it's a speech taht must be full of pro forma cheering, because who many people knew who Palin was that morning, or by the time they showed up?

Anyway, that also followed an odd sort of dog whistle to Kennedy Democrats, with the Profiles in Courage thing. Did they not realize that the Kennedy contingent were the peacemakers between the Obama and Clinton camps, such as was necessary? There was an appeal to union membership and thereby "lunchbucket" voters, but they can't think that the Kennedy stuff really helps them there, can they?

Not to mention the nice things that John Glenn said about Mac. Boy, that Keating Five sure were thick as, uh, thieves .....
posted by dhartung at 1:23 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


I don't think anyone has posted this yet:

The Daily Show covers the Sarah Palin Announcement.
posted by paisley henosis at 2:12 AM on August 30, 2008 [8 favorites]


Dangit, Civil_Disobedient, I wanted to be the first one to make that prediction. I think you've nailed it. She'll drop, someone else will step into the Veep spot, but the one part of your prediction that missed is that it isn't going to be middle-of-the-road R. It's going to be a far Right choice. That's the only way they can get a mass of voters [big enough to swing the whole election] to make that screeching U-turn.
posted by Lukenlogs at 2:34 AM on August 30, 2008


Civil_Disobedient: Palin won't last September. Mark my words. After all the political backlash that accompanies her selection, McCain will have no real choice but to drop her. Of course, he won't do it himself--she'll suddenly decide "her family needs more right now."

Oooh, excellent angle, I didn't see that one.
I guess this will give them the opportunity to steal this election as well, in case the whole new family/character thing doesn't pan out as planned: Like C_D suggested, they could just replace her by someone white, male and experienced, except that the replacement would take place only two weeks prior to the election. The polls will swing widely in both directions, as everybody is trying to make up their minds about the new situation, and at the finish line, the McCain team will be just slightly ahead, thanks to a little help by Premier/Diebold. "I guess this last-minute replacement did give the McCain team the last-minute boost it needed to come out on top."
posted by sour cream at 2:48 AM on August 30, 2008


LISTEN PEOPLE THE MOST FEMINIST RESPONSE is to recognize that all women live under and have to respond to and survive the patriarchy. And that competing in beauty pageants is a totally legit response to the shit that gets rained down, to the opportunities that are closed off, to the questions asked and the responses demanded. Everyone has their methods, their vanities, their ways of struggling, of taking advantage when necessary, of capitalizing on possible advances. It's a fucked up game and everyone is playing it. Beauty-Queen Palin is low-neckline everyone, is makeup and flirting or not, is pushing and pulling in response to the power that circulates. It doesn't mean what you think it means, her intelligence is not on the line.
posted by wemayfreeze at 3:19 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Talk about the most transparently token choice in recent political history.

Any other Mad Men fans out there?
posted by rafter at 3:31 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I guess Susan Collins, Christie Todd Whitman, Oympia Snowe, and Elizabeth Dole were busy.

Yup, busy being pro-choice, pro-gay rights or, in Elizabeth Dole's case, being 77.

Seriously, try finding Republican woman in government who isn't pro-choice. I haven't checked the House, but it's darn rare.
posted by heathkit at 3:38 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


She and her husband, Todd, also an athlete, named their first son Track because he was born in that sport's season.

I'm hoping the next kid's named Camp David.
posted by essexjan at 3:48 AM on August 30, 2008


Dammit, if Mitt Romney would have got the party nomination, instead of McCain, he and Palin could have run on the Sexy Fundy ticket.

The New Republicans: You want to fuck us, and boy, are we going to fuck you.
posted by dgaicun at 4:25 AM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


I guess Susan Collins, Christie Todd Whitman, Oympia Snowe, and Elizabeth Dole were busy.

Actually Liddy's had nothing but free time since NC sent her to the Senate 6 years ago, because she sure as hell hasn't been doing anything there. But she probably remembers the 1996 campaign and isn't particularly interested in doing it again.
posted by hydropsyche at 4:30 AM on August 30, 2008


the issue of how you pronounce 'Arkansas'

ar-kansas? like pirate kansas?
posted by kliuless at 4:54 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


the reasoning for why Sarah Palin should be elected Vice President of the United States seems to boil down to "She didn't have an abortion".

C'mon, there's more to her than that. She didn't have five abortions.
posted by hydrophonic at 4:56 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Whew. I can't believe I read the whole thing.

Fascinating stuff. I still can't decide if it's a brilliant choice or a totally stupid one. My gut reaction is that it's entirely banking on Hillary defection which I've always thought was more smoke than fire.

And sure she's got some hardcore right-wing points but I thought McCain would have those in the bag by default. Who else were the pro-gun, anti-abortion folks going to vote for?

It does neutralize some attacks (Biden probably can't be as mean without seeming like a jerk) but it also undermines many of McCain's lines of attack.

All in all it's a real interesting pick. As a Canadian Obama supporter I was hoping for Romney because he seems like a generic Republican creep who'd get brutalized by Biden in the debates. Now I'm not sure how it'll play out, which is something.
posted by frenetic at 4:57 AM on August 30, 2008


God, she sounds completely incoherent talking about foreign policy. I kept expecting her to propose sending maps to the Iraq.
posted by EarBucket at 4:59 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]



God, she sounds completely incoherent talking about foreign policy. I kept expecting her to propose sending maps to the Iraq.


"I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq."
-Sarah Palin, March 2007
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 5:12 AM on August 30, 2008


Oh god this shit just keeps getting better and better.

Local Reaction to the Palin Bombshell:
Alaska State Senate President Lyda Green (R): “She’s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president? Look at what she’s done to this state. What would she do to the nation?” (Green is from Palin’s home town of Wasilla.)

Alaska House Speaker John Harris (R): “She’s old enough. She’s a U.S. citizen.”

Alaska Democratic Party Chair Patti Higgins: “In this very competitive election for them to go pick somebody who is … under a cloud of suspicion, who is under investigation for abuse of power. It just sounds like a pretty slow start to me. We need a vice president who can step in if, God forbid, something happened to John McCain. I don’t think she’s someone who is ready for that 3 a.m. phone call.”

Randy Ruedrich, Alaska Republican Party Chair: Not giving interviews.

Alaska Attorney General Talis Colberg: “a mixed set of emotions, kind of an odd sense of Alaska nationalism or pride. This is like watching a moon landing or something. It’s just something you don’t expect to see very often. It’s wonderful. It was an emotional thing to see the governor walk out with her family and I say, wow, I work for her.”

McHugh Pierre, Alaska Republican Party Spokesman: “She brings her voice of new energy and change. And she knows Alaska.”

Indicted Alaska Sr. Senator Ted Stevens (R): “it’s a great day for the nation and Alaskans.”
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 5:37 AM on August 30, 2008 [8 favorites]


Fascinating stuff. I still can't decide if it's a brilliant choice or a totally stupid one.

In any case, John McCain has, again, demonstrated his ability to think outside the box, a trait that he picked up and perfected when he was forced to live in one for five years.

And Sarah Palin isn't doing to bad in that department either. I mean, Trig Paxson Van Palin!?
posted by sour cream at 5:48 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


yeah, so after a day, i'm going with the 'emerging narrative' of shoring up the base with a like-minded fellow maverick with a record of reform :P that is all!
posted by kliuless at 5:59 AM on August 30, 2008


'sarah palin' is an anagram for 'sip anal hair'
posted by quonsar at 6:07 AM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


named their first son Track because he was born in that sport's season.

With criteria like that, I'm surprised the other kids weren't named Duck, Deer, Bear and Football.
posted by kuujjuarapik at 6:28 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Well stated point, orthogonality, and I do agree with you. I was just moving more into "she is a bad person" realm than I felt comfortable.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 6:29 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


ar-kansas? like pirate kansas?

"The pronunciation of Arkansas (ar-kan-saw) was made official by an act of the state legislature in 1881 after a dispute between the two U.S. Senators from Arkansas. One wanted to pronounce the name ar-kán-sas and the other wanted ár-kan-saw." [wiki, footnote of interest]
posted by paisley henosis at 6:30 AM on August 30, 2008


Kevin Drum has an excellent post on Palin's stance on the issues, which lays out seven talking points the Obama camp ought to hammer hard:

Joe Klein on taxes: Palin exploded her state's coffers by imposing a windfall profits tax on the oil companies...sort of — no, exactly — like the proposal Barack Obama has made and John McCain has attacked. Apparently, she also supported the Bridge to Nowhere, despite her disclaimer at today's event. So how does McCain explain putting a tax-raising porker on his ticket?

Alaska native Charles Wohlforth on the Troopergate scandal: In July, Palin fired the beloved commissioner of Public Safety, Walt Monegan, without meaningful explanation. Monegan said he had resisted administration pressure to fire a State Trooper who was in a bitter child custody battle with Palin's sister. Palin first denied the pressure, then released evidence, including a recorded phone call, that backed up Monegan's story. The legislature, which isn't exactly Palin-friendly, hired an ex-prosecutor to investigate.

Sarah Palin on creationism vs. evolution in public schools: I am a proponent of teaching both. And, you know, I say this, too, as the daughter of a science teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the subject — creationism and evolution. It’s been a healthy foundation for me. But don’t be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides.

Anchorage Daily News reporter Tom Kizzia on social issues: A significant part of Palin's base of support lies among social and Christian conservatives. Her positions on social issues emerged slowly during the campaign: on abortion (should be banned for anything other than saving the life of the mother), stem cell research (opposed), physician-assisted suicide (opposed), creationism (should be discussed in schools), state health benefits for same-sex partners (opposed, and supports a constitutional amendment to bar them).

Sierra Club Executive Director Carl Pope on big oil: Palin herself told Roll Call earlier this week, "When I look every day, the big oil company's building is right out there next to me, and it's quite a reminder that we should have mutually beneficial relationships with the oil industry." No one is closer to the the oil industry than Governor Palin. Along with her support for drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge and off our coasts, she also opposes a windfall profit tax on the richest oil companies. Under her leadership, Alaska has sued the federal governent for considering listing the Polar Bear as a threatened species even though global warming threatens its very existence.

Sarah Palin on global warming: A changing environment will affect Alaska more than any other state, because of our location. I'm not one though who would attribute it to being man-made.

Politico's Glenn Thrush on spending: Palin, who portrays herself as a fiscal conservative, racked up nearly $20 million in long-term debt as mayor of the tiny town of Wasilla — that amounts to $3,000 per resident. She argues that the debt was needed to fund improvements.

posted by EarBucket at 6:37 AM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


What a depressing thread, I came here excited to see the unqualified, inexperienced and going to be deposed Palin ripped to pieces as an obviosly horrible choice and great news for Obama. But it seems like the majority of Obama supporters here still can only see the glass as half empty.

Obama could have picked Jesus as his VP and McCain could have picked Zombie Hitler, y'all would still be whining that "Jesus is an all right guy, but what is he going to do in the debates with his turn the other cheek policy? Zombie Hitler will probably just eat is arm right off and he won't do anything about it."
posted by afu at 6:44 AM on August 30, 2008 [12 favorites]


Oh man. I saw Newt Gringrich on the Today Show this morning and he was talking about how, looking at the candidates on a split screen with the sound off he couldn't get over how they got the exciting young candidate and the Democrats picked the boring old white guy.

I just don't know what to do with that. My satire meter has exploded.
posted by Solon and Thanks at 6:48 AM on August 30, 2008 [7 favorites]


Sarah Palin laughs with radio host as he calls her opponent a "bitch" and a "cancer".

Her opponent in question, Lydia green, is a cancer survivor.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:02 AM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


It does neutralize some attacks (Biden probably can't be as mean without seeming like a jerk) but it also undermines many of McCain's lines of attack.


No, it doesn't. It's ok to have the inexperienced but talented person in the #2 slot, but putting that person in the #1 slot, like the Democrats did, when we're in the midst of two wars?! That's not only crazy and stupid, that's just plain irresponsible and UnAmerican! Expect similar arguments.

The Dems would do well to stop calling her a lightweight, especially in terms of debating Biden. At this point all she has to do is hold her own and she'll come out looking golden while Biden, the supposed experienced master, wouldn't be portrayed as a buffoon for not being able to beat that skirt from podunk Alaska.

McCain is the issue. Hit HIM hard.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 7:07 AM on August 30, 2008


Sarah Palin laughs with radio host as he calls her opponent a "bitch" and a "cancer".

Well I guess that explains this reaction by fellow Republican Green:

Alaska State Senate President Lyda Green (R): “She’s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president? Look at what she’s done to this state. What would she do to the nation?” (Green is from Palin’s home town of Wasilla.)

But in any case, she is a fresh face and has her heart in the right place, so she can say anything she wants, including all that stupid nonsense about how the earth was created 6000 years ago and global warming is not man-made. Didn't you get the memo?
posted by sour cream at 7:16 AM on August 30, 2008


McCain's Folly... enough said.
posted by JoeXIII007 at 7:17 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Top McCain aide says McCain won't die during his first term in office, and admits Palin isn't ready to be commander in chief
Putting aside the creepiness of a top McCain adviser having to reassure the nation that McCain, at 72 years of age with four bouts of cancer, won't die in office, what Charlie Black said today was particularly damning of McCain's VP choice, Sarah Palin:
Mr. McCain’s advisers said Friday that Mr. McCain was well aware that Ms. Palin would be criticized for her lack of foreign policy experience, but that he viewed her as exceptionally talented and intelligent and that he felt she would be able to be educated quickly.

‘She’s going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he’ll be around at least that long,’ said Charlie Black, one of Mr. McCain’s top advisers, making light of concerns about Mr. McCain’s health, which Mr. McCain’s doctors reported as excellent in May.
So Black, the guy who said another 9/11-style attack on America would help McCain's campaign, is saying that McCain's VP doesn't know a thing about national security, but she can learn on the job over the next four years, you know, like night school. We're at war. And they're admitting that Palin may be our next commander in chief on day one, if McCain were to die or fall ill in office, yet she knows nothing about national security, and has never met a world leader.”
While Palin crams for the "Commander-in-Chief" test, Bill Frist reviews McCain's medical records and guarantees him immortality!
posted by ericb at 7:20 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Delicious to imagine the cognitive dissonance in the mind of the average person in that crowd ...

Rove Flips On Qualifications For Vice Presidency, Says Palin Is Qualified For Same Reason Kaine Was Not
“Earlier this month, Karl Rove repeatedly argued that Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine (D) would not be ‘capable’ of being Vice President. He complained that ‘he’s been a governor for three years’ and said Kaine was mayor of only the ‘the 105th largest city in America,’ referring to Kaine’s tenure as mayor of Richmond, VA. ‘It’s not a big town,’ he quipped.

Yesterday, however, Rove argued just the opposite with regard to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R). He explained on Fox News that Palin was a good choice as McCain’s vice presidential nominee because she was ‘mayor of the second largest city in Alaska’:
ROVE: She’s a populist, she’s an economic and a social conservative, she’s a reformer, she took on the incumbent governor of the state Frank Murkowski — Republican — beat him in the primary, won an upset in the general election. She’s a former mayor. She’s the mayor of, I think, the second largest city in Alaska before she ran for governor.
Kaine was indeed mayor of the ‘the 105th largest city in America.’ While there, he governed nearly 200,000 people and managed a bureaucracy of over 8,000 employees. By contrast, Palin was mayor of Wasilla, AK, a town of just over 8,000 people that currently employs just over 100 individuals and — contrary to Rove’s claim — didn’t even make it into the 10 largest cities in AK while she was mayor.”
posted by ericb at 7:29 AM on August 30, 2008 [10 favorites]


Governor Palin Visits troops.
"Ms. Palin appears to have traveled very little outside the United States. In July 2007, she had to get a passport before she visited members of the Alaska National Guard stationed in Kuwait, according to her deputy communications director, Sharon Leighow. She also visited wounded troops in Germany during that trip."
posted by ericb at 7:32 AM on August 30, 2008


Watching them on stage yesterday, it seemed kind of Pygmalion-ish.
posted by carter at 7:40 AM on August 30, 2008


The Dems would do well to stop calling her a lightweight, especially in terms of debating Biden. At this point all she has to do is hold her own and she'll come out looking golden while Biden, the supposed experienced master, wouldn't be portrayed as a buffoon for not being able to beat that skirt from podunk Alaska.

Excellent point- like Gore and W in 2000, Biden is in an almost unwinnable situation.
posted by gjc at 7:40 AM on August 30, 2008


Excellent point- like Gore and W in 2000, Biden is in an almost unwinnable situation.

It's fine. He should not even engage her in the Veep debate, as she has nothing. All Biden has to do is ignore her (but not in a dismissive, sexist way... the tricky part) and focus his debate on attacking the Bush/McCain record. She won't be able to defend the record, and he can avoid looking like he's attacking her.
posted by psmealey at 7:44 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


SCANDAL! RUMOR! EXTRA!

Is Trig Palin really Bristol's child?

SCANDAL! HEARSAY! READ ALL ABOUT IT!
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 7:47 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Already mentioned above: Am I too late to the thread to discuss the incredibly odd rumor that the new kid may not be hers at all, but her daughter's?
posted by ericb at 7:50 AM on August 30, 2008


Yeah, I think Biden has a bit of a tricky line to walk in the debate, but so does Palin. All she has to do is say one stupid thing and that becomes her narrative. All it'll take is one "potatoe" soundbyte.

Remember John McCain talking a few weeks ago about the border between Iraq and Pakistan? That didn't stick with him, because the existing narrative is that he knows all about foreign policy, and gaffes usually don't get traction unless they reinforce people's preconceptions about someone. If Palin had said that, she'd become a punchline. And given the stuff that's already coming out just from the last month (saying she doesn't know what the vice president's job is? really?) I don't think we have long to wait.
posted by EarBucket at 7:51 AM on August 30, 2008


The Dems would do well to stop calling her a lightweight, especially in terms of debating Biden. At this point all she has to do is hold her own and she'll come out looking golden while Biden, the supposed experienced master, wouldn't be portrayed as a buffoon for not being able to beat that skirt from podunk Alaska.

As if it matters. Kerry absolutely destroyed Bush in all three debates, leaving Bush stammering like a buffoon and still lost. The debates don't do anything to change elections. The only thing idiot Americans have the attention span for are 30 second tv spots. That's the only way to move the people of America. The most important thing to happen so far in this election was the McCain Paris Hilton ad. If the Dems don't wake up and figure out how to connect McCain's anger to something in pop culture that they can relate to he'll have no chance. The Dems historically make the mistake that Americans are intelligent people, we are not, we are idiots, treat us like idiots and you'll have a chance.
posted by any major dude at 7:56 AM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


900!
Or thereabouts

Stay positive fellow Obama people, she's greener than a fluorescent booger. And McCain's older than Archimede's Screw. These are not great first impressions for the low information voters. There is much hope yet for November.
posted by nudar at 7:57 AM on August 30, 2008


As far as the pregnancy thing goes, this video looks to me like she could be pregnant. She doesn't look seven months along at all, but some women do carry differently.
posted by EarBucket at 8:00 AM on August 30, 2008


Good call, psmealey. It's just like debating stuff here — or anywhere, for that matter. It's always best to stick to the issues rather than making personal attacks. Someone who knows his or her stuff will always come across better than someone who doesn't.
posted by orange swan at 8:01 AM on August 30, 2008


It's fine. He should not even engage her in the Veep debate, as she has nothing. All Biden has to do is ignore her (but not in a dismissive, sexist way... the tricky part) and focus his debate on attacking the Bush/McCain record. She won't be able to defend the record, and he can avoid looking like he's attacking her.

Biden is a smart man, so I reckon that's exactly what he'll do. He's not going to beat her up. Which is exactly why she'll bring up her kids, her unaborted disabled child, over and over and over. Hopefully, Biden will respond by talking about which party has tried to do more for the nation's children and their parents, and which party has forsaken their futures to finance a disastrous war. Biden could play the child card just as well as Palin, if not better, because while she'll have the one-note melody of "I didn't abort my kids", he'll be able to say, "And no one loves kids as much as the Democratic Party, because of A, B, C, and D."
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:02 AM on August 30, 2008


Ack, ericb, I swear I searched. Big thread makes brain go ow.
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 8:02 AM on August 30, 2008


Her reproductive and child rearing choices are hers and the "first dude"'s. I find the discussion of these choices here utterly creepy. Privacy is at least the legal foundation of abortion rights in the US, right?

Also - with regards to the "problem" of breastfeeding while in office or campaigning... Grow up. America should have such problems as a VP who is a breastfeeding PSA.
posted by ~ at 8:19 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


dhartung: Oh wow, the crowd starts chanting "Yes We Can" at the 25:00 Mark. I have no idea what that means.
posted by Weebot at 8:23 AM on August 30, 2008


But it seems like the majority of Obama supporters here still can only see the glass as half empty.

It's okay. Novelty wears off quickly. And this whole election cycle has played out like some meth-crazed cleaning spree so I can't see it lasting long. The Palin pick was mostly unexpected and Obama supporters went to bed with the acceptance speech dominating the news then basically woke up to the Palin pick dominating the news. It was a well played media ploy and on the surface the pick appears (barely) effective and exciting. I'm sure there's also some lingering doubts about the Biden pick in the context of the FISA and offshore drilling compromises Obama has supported since winning the nomination. And the timing and unexpectedness of the pick basically took a lot of air out of the media gains from the Democratic Convention and effectively neutralized the Obama speech, so this was a fantastic morale killer.

I think of it like a bad chess move, though. McCain has just put his queen in the center of the board very early in the game. But it actually isn't a queen, it's two pawns taped together, and he moved it three spaces forward and four spaces to the right in one move, seemingly putting Obama in check. But that all depends on if you buy the story that the two pawns taped together is actually a queen and accept the improper move. Sure, it kinda looks like a queen, and the move was kinda like a diagonal, but the bluff is ridiculous and obvious.
posted by effwerd at 8:28 AM on August 30, 2008 [8 favorites]


... the crowd starts chanting "Yes We Can" at the 25:00 Mark. I have no idea what that means.

Co-opting the Obama phrase and chant from the other night: "Yes We Can" (as per the original will.i.am video).
posted by ericb at 8:29 AM on August 30, 2008


"Amid chants of "Yes we can," Democrats nominated Barack Obama for president."*
posted by ericb at 8:33 AM on August 30, 2008


Obama Modifies 'Yes We Can' Message To Exclude Area Loser
posted by lukemeister at 8:38 AM on August 30, 2008


She doesn't look seven months along at all, but some women do carry differently.

Nicole Kidman had a baby this year, and she never looked as pregnant as she was. I have a friend, too, who didn't gain enough weight while pregnant to have to wear maternity clothes.
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 8:41 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Here's an essay that explains the major reason this was a huge mistake.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:42 AM on August 30, 2008


New Obama television ad featuring McCain's choice of Palin: "No Change."
posted by ericb at 8:44 AM on August 30, 2008


As far as the pregnancy thing goes, this video looks to me like she could be pregnant.

Yes, but she's drinking COFFEE! OMG who will think of the CHILDRUN!!!11ELEVENTY1!
posted by The Bellman at 8:45 AM on August 30, 2008


Newsweek: McCain’s ‘Hail Sarah’ Pass -- "His choice for veep is all but set up for failure in the fall."
posted by ericb at 8:49 AM on August 30, 2008


Hey, guys, don't worry! This guy says she'll step down if McCain dies!

This election is such an awesome roller coaster.
posted by Bookhouse at 9:12 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is Trig Palin really Bristol's child?

My sister! My daughter! My sister! My daughter!
posted by shakespeherian at 9:18 AM on August 30, 2008 [11 favorites]


ericb writes "‘She’s going to learn national security at the foot of the master for the next four years, and most doctors think that he’ll be around at least that long,’ said Charlie Black, one of Mr. McCain’s top advisers,"

Most doctors. At least that long.

Wow, just wow.
posted by orthogonality at 9:20 AM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


That might be the worst piece of spin yet in this election cycle. "Yeah, she's not ready, but we figure she can learn on the job, and she'll probably be up to it in a couple of years. And we're pretty sure McCain won't drop dead by then. Probably."
posted by EarBucket at 9:23 AM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think the big mistake everyone here is making is this: you focus on why she is a poor choice and why she will fail.

You need to keep in mind that she was very deliberately selected. There is a reason why the powers behind the process chose her. It advances them toward a goal.

What you should be doing is trying to figure out what that goal is.
posted by five fresh fish at 9:27 AM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


Alaska House Speaker John Harris (R): “She’s old enough. She’s a U.S. citizen.”

That's a ringing endorsement. She's much more qualified than I am. I'm not old enough, and I'm not a U.S. citizen.

Anyway, Northern Exposure sucked once the Fleischman character left.

Fleishman and O'Connell were the most annoying characters on the show - the storylines about the other characters were much better. I think the problem with the end of the series is not that Fleishman left, but that they tried to (badly) replace him. Also, they were messing around with the schedule - that's just a death knell to any show.

Course, I would have happily tuned into the "Ed & Ruth-anne Show" (with Marilyn as perpetual guess star). I think Ed was enough neroses for the show, they didn't need to import so many nervous southerners.
posted by jb at 9:31 AM on August 30, 2008


I think the goal is pretty clear. McCain is the underdog. If he does nothing, he's doomed in November. He figures that rather than play it safe and lose for sure, he'd rather make a high-risk play and at least have a chance at winning.

Obama's choice of Biden is fundamentally confident. Biden doesn't bring a huge amount to the table electorally, but he's very much someone you could be comfortable with running the country. It's a governance choice, not an electoral one. It means he thinks he's going to win.

McCain choosing Palin means he thinks he's going to lose, and he needs to take a longshot chance at winning and deal with governing once he gets in.
posted by EarBucket at 9:33 AM on August 30, 2008 [10 favorites]


Palin Ad Starring Ted Stevens Already Scrubbed From Palin's Campaign Website
posted by homunculus at 9:41 AM on August 30, 2008


I'm sure there's also some lingering doubts about the Biden pick in the context of the FISA and offshore drilling compromises Obama has supported since winning the nomination.

The lingering doubts about Biden are that he's a boring old wrinkly white guy from a small northeastern state, not policy details. McCain picked an exciting VP option; Obama went boring.

An exciting VP choice is no guarantee of a win. But all the attention McCain's choice is getting is a good example of how a good choice has the potential to transform the race.
posted by Forktine at 9:46 AM on August 30, 2008


McCain did not choose Palin. McCain does not make very many choices during a campaign. He is a professionally-managed player. The much-smarter powers behind the party selected Palin for a purpose. "Longshot chance at winning" was certainly not the reason for selecting her.

Think strategically: the professionals that control the Republican party certainly do.
posted by five fresh fish at 9:49 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Why shouldn't Biden beat her up (rhetorically) in the VP debate? Isn't it sexist to say that? Wouldn't that contradict what she says herself in her comments about Hillary's "whining"?

This pick is a continuation of George W. Bush's tradition of picking unqualified incompetents and putting them into roles that are way over their heads, like putting Michael "Heckuva Job" Brown in charge of FEMA.
posted by kirkaracha at 9:49 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Also, I owe Dan Quayle an apology. I compared him to Governor Palin, but he was considerably more experienced when he was picked as the VP candidate.
posted by kirkaracha at 9:52 AM on August 30, 2008


Interestingly, she's polling much better among men than women.
posted by EarBucket at 9:52 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


The Dems historically make the mistake that Americans are intelligent people, we are not, we are idiots, treat us like idiots and you'll have a chance.

I cannot stress this enough.

The much-smarter powers behind the party selected Palin for a purpose. "Longshot chance at winning" was certainly not the reason for selecting her.

What you should be doing is trying to figure out what that goal is.

To get her something tantamount to the pow card? McCain has been in war, obviously. Palin's son is going off to war on (coinkydinkyinky!) 9/11 right? Let's say he dies in combat. Then you have McCain talking about the war, p.o.w.!p.o.w.!p.o.w.!, and Palin now is the grieving military mom who nobody can question because her son just died in Iraq. The news will be abuzz and they'll play the pow/grieving military mother angle with flags flying and eagles soaring and them looking sooo American.

"Palin isn't experienced. She had no opinion on the war in March 2007"

"Well she's had the experience of just losing a son in Iraq - is that not enough?"

"She's not ready - she doesn't have the experience to lead our troops"

"She already gave the life of her child. Who better to sincerely have their interests in mind."
posted by cashman at 10:07 AM on August 30, 2008


ericb: Well, I know that part already. I'm referring more to the fact that Obama's rhetoric seems to be defining his opponent's campaigns — Hillary's, McCain's. It's not a bad position to be in.
posted by Weebot at 10:16 AM on August 30, 2008


I also think those initial polling numbers are as good as it's going to get for her; it's all downhill from here. A year and a half ago, when she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, the GOP base was fired up over Fred Thompson, who was going to be the second coming of Ronald Reagan and save the party. Remember that guy?
posted by EarBucket at 10:49 AM on August 30, 2008


Exactly, EarBucket.

(good name, BTW)
posted by Bookhouse at 11:05 AM on August 30, 2008


It just gets better and better:

Former House Speaker Gail Phillips, a Republican political leader who has clashed with Palin in the past, was shocked when she heard the news Friday morning with her husband, Walt.

"I said to Walt, 'This can't be happening, because his advance team didn't come to Alaska to check her out," Phillips said.

Phillips has been active in the Ted Stevens re-election steering committee and remains in close touch with Sen. Lisa Murkowski and other party leaders, and she said nobody had heard anything about McCain's people doing research on his prospective running mate.

"We're not a very big state. People I talk to would have heard something."


It sounds like the McCain campaign didn't bother to vet her. How is that possible?
posted by EarBucket at 11:14 AM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


LOL THE REPUBLICANS ARE SCREWED

LET'S GO PARTY NOW, WE'VE WON.
posted by kldickson at 11:23 AM on August 30, 2008


Quidam: The bottom line is that the bulk of America, especially the bulk of conservative America, isn't going to vote for who they're going to vote for because they look long and hard at voting records and experience - they're going to say "Wow, I really like her! She's got 5 kids! Her son's in the military!" and that will be the end of it.

any major dude:The Dems historically make the mistake that Americans are intelligent people, we are not, we are idiots, treat us like idiots and you'll have a chance.

This. This, this, this. Average Americans have already proved that their votes are driven by gut feelings, not rationality. I can't believe the number of Dems making the same mistake they made in previous elections, making fun of a candidate for perceived lack of intelligence, lack of academic credentials, etc. Average Americans don't value intellectualism the way you do. You think if Palin makes a mistake like "potatoe" it'll sink her? Guess what, average Americans can't spell. They identify with people who are like them. They'll vote for people who are like them. The more they hear from Dems making fun of people like them, the more they'll reject the Dems' candidate.

Dems can ridicule her until the cows come home (and criticizing her for having a Downs kid? Christ!), and all they'll be doing is proving to Dick and Jane American that Dems have nothing but contempt for hardworking people who care about their families, who never got a college degree but worked their way up, despite intellectual snobbery from people like you.
posted by cybercoitus interruptus at 11:26 AM on August 30, 2008 [13 favorites]


The Dems historically make the mistake that Americans are intelligent people, we are not, we are idiots, treat us like idiots and you'll have a chance.

I disagree. The same mistake I've seen Democrats make over the years is taxes and guns. They've been taxing poor people to the detriment of the economy and government. A Republican can still dishonestly claim to lower taxes in America and get the attention of the working class. Dollar for dollar, the worst mistake ever for raising money in a demand economy. As for guns, they made people who see themselves as guardians take the side of the raider.
posted by Brian B. at 11:36 AM on August 30, 2008


Dems can ridicule her until the cows come home (and criticizing her for having a Downs kid? Christ!), and all they'll be doing is proving to Dick and Jane American that Dems have nothing but contempt for hardworking people who care about their families, who never got a college degree but worked their way up, despite intellectual snobbery from people like you.

You know, this old saw about what some vague, nebulous "Dick and Jane American" thinks and feels is wearing thin. "Dick and Jane American would never make a black man a viable candidate" - "Dick and Jane American would never vote for a guy with 'Hussein' for a middle name" - "Dick and Jane American in Iowa are going to put some old white guy in the forefront, Obama's done." Looks like we've got a different set of Dick and Jane Americans this year!

Votes are driven by gut feelings, sure. But it seems that this year, there's a different set of feelings people are voting from.

And do you honestly think it's "intellectual snobbery" to go after someone's lack of experience? Seemed to be good enough for "plain-talkin" McCain, up until yesterday, anyway.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:37 AM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Why shouldn't Biden beat her up (rhetorically) in the VP debate? Isn't it sexist to say that? Wouldn't that contradict what she says herself in her comments about Hillary's "whining"?

It *is* sexist to think that she can't handle a debate with the good ol' boys. But that won't stop the media from playing it that way- what sells more Ped-Eggs?:

- "More experienced candidate wins debate."

or

- "Mean old white guy makes sexy librarian lady-governor cry."
posted by gjc at 11:43 AM on August 30, 2008


I disagree. The same mistake I've seen Democrats make over the years is taxes and guns. They've been taxing poor people to the detriment of the economy and government. A Republican can still dishonestly claim to lower taxes in America and get the attention of the working class. Dollar for dollar, the worst mistake ever for raising money in a demand economy. As for guns, they made people who see themselves as guardians take the side of the raider.

How are we going to pay for all the GOP big-government programs with out taxes?
posted by gjc at 11:45 AM on August 30, 2008


Hey, guys, don't worry! This guy says she'll step down if McCain dies!

McCain/To Be Announced '08

The lingering doubts about Biden are that he's a boring old wrinkly white guy from a small northeastern state, not policy details.

I won't argue. It works out the same in the end.

As far as the merits of making an exciting pick over a practical pick, well, I'm glad Obama went with practical.

It just gets better and better:

Former House Speaker Gail Phillips, a Republican political leader who has clashed with Palin in the past, was shocked when she heard the news Friday morning with her husband, Walt.

"I said to Walt, 'This can't be happening, because his advance team didn't come to Alaska to check her out," Phillips said.


I know it was suggested far up in the thread but this "Hockey Mom President" idea is sounding better and better. I mean someone at Lifetime has to be smacking their forehead.
posted by effwerd at 11:45 AM on August 30, 2008


He didn't vet her?

THE NEW SEASON OF "WHO WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT" IS AWESOME!!!111!
posted by Bookhouse at 11:51 AM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


Regarding the teen-pregnancy rumors, the Democrats AND liberal websites need to stay far, far away from that one. It's SO soap opera-esque and sleazy. Just leave it to the National Enquirer to crack the case ... if there's any truth to it, I'm sure they'll have it into print, vetted by lawyers, within a week. Since they brought down Edwards, it wouldn't seem partisan ... the Enquirer's role IS to go after the high-drama and sleazy. But the left should try to stay above it all.

As for the equally distasteful thread of "parents (especially mothers) of young kids shouldn't have stressful, high-level jobs" ... you'd think that anyone smart and efficient enough to get a stressful, high-level job can also organize their personal life well enough to take care of everybody.

Really, there's enough to talk about regarding Palin's government experience and policies that we don't need to go anyplace else.
posted by lisa g at 11:56 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


McCain did not choose Palin. McCain does not make very many choices during a campaign. He is a professionally-managed player. The much-smarter powers behind the party selected Palin for a purpose. "Longshot chance at winning" was certainly not the reason for selecting her.

What has the McCain campaign done that has made you think it's well run, it's near bankruptcy last year, the massive staff rearrangement in the middle of the summer or was it the fact that he won because the rest of the field imploded on themselves? Karl Rove is not running the McCain campaign, and while some of his spawn are, they are not showing themselves to be his equal.

Democrats have huge structural and political advantages this year and a great candidate for president. he adults that run the republican party understand this better than progressives scared shittless by Rove, which is why they went with the hail mary that is Palin. We need to stop being such so fucking scared of the republicans and start showing some confidence.
posted by afu at 11:57 AM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


How are we going to pay for all the GOP big-government programs with out taxes?

Tax the people with accountants, not wage earners who need new tires and brakes. How to do this fairly? Just don't tax anyone for any income under the average line. Levy a flat tax on all income after that.
posted by Brian B. at 11:58 AM on August 30, 2008


Please let Trig be short for Trigonometry, and Track short for Tracheotomy. Please.
posted by Grangousier at 12:00 PM on August 30, 2008


Thanks, lisa g. I agree 100%. No good can come of either strategy, and I have my doubts that any serious Democratic players - or any party that wants to keep women voters - are going to fling either one about. Especially since the Dems have the momentum and the energy to go all the way.

This is what I meant upthread about a "her reproductive system" offense seeming, to me, like false flag concern trolling.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:07 PM on August 30, 2008


The Dems historically make the mistake that Americans are intelligent people, we are not, we are idiots, treat us like idiots and you'll have a chance.

I disagree. The same mistake I've seen Democrats make over the years is taxes and guns. They've been taxing poor people to the detriment of the economy and government. A Republican can still dishonestly claim to lower taxes in America and get the attention of the working class. Dollar for dollar, the worst mistake ever for raising money in a demand economy. As for guns, they made people who see themselves as guardians take the side of the raider.


Your comment proves the point that Americans don't vote on facts.

The current tax proposal from the Democratice candidate would cut taxes for poor people and the middle class BY A GREATER PERCENTAGE than the Republican candidate. Every family making up to about $111,000 a year (well above the median household income, and thus including all middle class people, who are, you know, suposedly in the middle of income distribution) would be taxed less by the so-called "tax & spend" Democratic candidate than the actually tax you more and rich people less Republican candidate. The current Republican candidate who wishes to tax poor people and the middle class -- a lot more than the current Democrats -- while doing nothing to address the cost of healthcare - a far greater burden for poor and middle class families in economic bad times than taxes. At the end of this year, I will have paid about $1500 in taxes for myself and my husband; my health care costs $2400, and that's after my employer has already paid half.

It's not just that the Republicans lie about who their tax cuts are for - it's also that the American people apparently let themselves be so ill-informed that they don't even understand the simplest aspect of the differences in the candidates - differences that can be summed up (and which have been summed up) on a simple graphic which is widely available.

Leaving aside the debate about whether tax cuts are or are not a good idea (so far, economic history does not support their efficacy as economic stimulants), in November thousands or even millions of Americans who support tax cuts will be voting against the candidate who would give them a bigger tax cut because they refuse to inform themselves as to the actual facts of the two platforms. By their own ideals, they will be voting like idiots.
posted by jb at 12:07 PM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


Vet her, nothing - it's starting to sound like they didn't even focus group her. The first round of polls has opinion running from a high of warm fuzzies and outright disdain. The choice might get a few more people out to vote - some of the evangelicals who were thinking of staying home this year - but I think it's going to register as a joke for the majority of people.

On the other hand, talk about setting the bar low... She could probably just start flinging poo at reporters and later be hailed as exceeding expectations. And the papers would call her a maverick, unafraid to fling shit at the press corps in the face of hard questions about the issues.
posted by kaibutsu at 12:07 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Tax the people with accountants, not wage earners who need new tires and brakes.

Good christ, generalize much? Accountants bad tires good?

How to do this fairly? Just don't tax anyone for any income under the average line. Levy a flat tax on all income after that.

I bet that doesn't seem fair to all the people who are stuck with that tax bill.
posted by gjc at 12:10 PM on August 30, 2008


Yup, busy being pro-choice, pro-gay rights or, in Elizabeth Dole's case, being 77.

Actually, it's 72, but that's still pretty shocking. She looks like she's in her late 40s or something. Must have had a lot of work done.

This. This, this, this. Average Americans have already proved that their votes are driven by gut feelings, not rationality. I can't believe the number of Dems making the same mistake they made in previous elections, making fun of a candidate for perceived lack of intelligence, lack of academic credentials, etc. Average Americans don't value intellectualism the way you do. You think if Palin makes a mistake like "potatoe" it'll sink her? Guess what, average Americans can't spell. They identify with people who are like them. They'll vote for people who are like them. The more they hear from Dems making fun of people like them, the more they'll reject the Dems' candidate.

Oh god not this again. That's such bullshit. Look, Obama is up in the polls, he's been up in the polls all year except for a few points where McCain managed to pull within the margin of error, and he's been way up since the start of his Convention. All this fear about how all Americans are pig-ignorant religious nutbag xenophobes is wearing a little thin. The average American doesn't fall for that bullshit. Now there certainly may be some below average people out there who will be fooled, and unfortunately they make up a key swing demographic: People to stupid to know what's going on. A lot of the campaign is tailored to them and it gives people the impression that the entire country is retarded.

But in fact it's just a key swing demographic, just like old people in Florida, Soccer Moms, etc.

Most Americans have made up their mind and Sarah Palin is not going to change it. It will have a huge motivational effect on the republican base, though, because she is a hardcore religious nutter, like Mike Huckabee
posted by delmoi at 12:13 PM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin Adds Right-Wing Cruelty To GOP Ticket
posted by homunculus at 12:20 PM on August 30, 2008


I know it was suggested far up in the thread but this "Hockey Mom President" idea is sounding better and better. I mean someone at Lifetime has to be smacking their forehead.

Geena Davis is Mackenzie Allen, a leftfield VP pick who becomes the first femaie president after the guy that picked her suddenly dies in office. Her arch-nemesis is, er, this dude.
posted by cillit bang at 12:21 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Tax the people with accountants, not wage earners who need new tires and brakes
posted by Brian B. at 2:58 PM on August 30 [+] [!]

Then you will be voting for Obama then in the fall? Since his tax-cut proposals favour wage earners far more than McCain's do.

However, you also don't seem to realise that any flat tax (as you propose) would benefit "people with accountants", at the detriment of "wage earners who need new tires and brakes".

How to tax people fairly? By having a progressive, tiered income tax whereby those who make more income (and thus have a higher proportion of their income as disposable income) pay a higher proportion of that income in taxes, with suitable deductions to recognize that people are individuals with individual situations and needs. It's a simple matter of arithmetic -- taking 15% from someone who has a disposable income of 15% is less fair than taking 15% from someone whose disposable income is 60% of the total. So why not take 5% from the first person, and 20% from the second? In both cases, you are taking 1/3 of their disposable income, whereas under a flat tax, one person would be paying 100% of their disposable income in tax, while the richer person who has more disposable income to start with pays only 1/4 of that in tax. Even in a progressive system, rich people have way more money than poor or middle class people, so you can't make any "incentive" argument against it.*

Funny enough, that would be a tax system like the one that exists in most first world countries, including the U.S. (to a degree). McCain's proposals would like to weaken that system at a time when the gov't is looking at bankruptcy in just a few decades, while Obama's would like to shore up government financing while offering tax cuts to the exact people you claim to care about.

* (Seriously - if anyone tries to make the argument that poor people are better off under current tax regimes, I want to see them live off minimum wage for a year. Until then, your words are like the quacking of birds. Not pretty song birds, but really uninformed and illogical birds.)
posted by jb at 12:25 PM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


Your comment proves the point that Americans don't vote on facts.

They vote on preferences, which becomes a fact. The fact they never got the solution memo or the problem memo is more likely than not. Either way I don't support treating anyone like dummies, because educating is easier than misinforming, and the latter presumes they're being taken advantage of--the excuse of likely the motive. The New York Times withheld all that damaging information on Bush, in favor of Kerry, until after the election because they believed in their own corrupt superiority.

Good christ, generalize much? Accountants bad tires good?

Over your head it seems.
posted by Brian B. at 12:26 PM on August 30, 2008


Well, as long as we are doing anagrams, I favor 'sharia plan' and 'a sharp nail'.
posted by A-Train at 12:31 PM on August 30, 2008


jb: In November thousands or even millions of Americans who support tax cuts will be voting against the candidate who would give them a bigger tax cut because they refuse to inform themselves as to the actual facts of the two platforms.

I think it is quite simple. Obama wants tax cuts for some people and a tax increase for other people. McCain, on the other hand, wants tax cuts for everybody! Don't all of the hard-working people in this country deserve a tax cut? People who want tax cuts for everybody should vote for McCain! How's that not in their best interest?

Hey, the same argument worked for Bush, why shouldn't it work this time?
posted by sour cream at 12:33 PM on August 30, 2008


Just don't tax anyone for any income under the average line. Levy a flat tax on all income after that.

Flat taxes are effectively regressive and harder on people with lower incomes. And why should I work harder to pull myself up above the average line if it suddenly means I'll be taxed and have a cut to my take home pay?
posted by hydrophonic at 12:39 PM on August 30, 2008


Hard working people like... John McCain, who married into a fortune that financed his senate run and bought his eight-to-ten-depending-on-how-you-count luxury homes.
posted by kaibutsu at 12:48 PM on August 30, 2008


please dont die please dont die please dont die...
"Im not supposed to say this anymore, but people, i ran a town thats about as big as a Biden family reunion. ive been governor of alaska for 19 months. Yesterday, somoene was talking about the asian flu and i figured we were talking health care so i said something about the importance of pharmaceutical research and it turned out they meant a central banking crisis and aspirin wasnt going to help."
posted by madamjujujive at 12:55 PM on August 30, 2008 [11 favorites]


Then you will be voting for Obama then in the fall?

I live in a crimson red state, Obama doesn't need my vote anymore than some others do.

However, you also don't seem to realise that any flat tax (as you propose) would benefit "people with accountants", at the detriment of "wage earners who need new tires and brakes".

No. I realize the ins and outs of progressive tax brackets and marginal rates just fine, I've been correcting people for years on the giant misconception of its unfairness. So after wasting all that time, I realized that it would be easier to simply assume the logic that any money taken needs to be after subsistence spending first, and that creates the margin. Compare a 32% flat tax after a $40,000 household exemption and you'll see progressive rates. The 80K income pays 16% of total, and the 800K income exceeds 30% of total.
posted by Brian B. at 12:55 PM on August 30, 2008


Hard working people like... John McCain, who married into a fortune that financed his senate run and bought his eight-to-ten-depending-on-how-you-count luxury homes.

And don't forget: McCain's trophy wife bought him a private jet so that he could fly around the country and denounce his opponent as an elitist.
posted by AsYouKnow Bob at 1:01 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


This. This, this, this. Average Americans have already proved that their votes are driven by gut feelings, not rationality.

I think you are right. Karl Rove, et al, know that many Americans harken back to the days of junior high school/high school student council and Prom Queen elections (e.g. With whom would you rather have a beer at the 'kegger.). Hence, the attempt to cast Obama as "effete, elite, intellectual, nerdy," etc. and McCain as "real guy, macho, maverick, P.O.W., 5th from the bottom of his class at Annapolis." McCain/Rove have now introduced a woman, ex-beauty queen, working mother with a young child with disabilities and a son soon off to Iraq. It's about the "life stories" and how they get framed. It's all about "identity politics."

Unfortunately, the majority of us fall for it and do not dig deeper (as many do here on MeFi) -- and enter the voting booth, casting a ballot often in contrast to our best interests as individuals and collectively as a country.
posted by ericb at 1:09 PM on August 30, 2008


This is presumably meant to be charming

(and where the fuck is Bridget?)
posted by cillit bang at 1:16 PM on August 30, 2008


Unfortunately, the majority of us fall for it and do not dig deeper (as many do here on MeFi) -- and enter the voting booth, casting a ballot often in contrast to our best interests as individuals and collectively as a country.

I wouldn't really say the majority of us fall for it. 2000 was very, very close, and 2004 had a Dem running against an incumbent, popular president in wartime. Then the Dems take Congress in 2006, and that's before Obama managed to trash most pre-conceived notions (including my own) of what it takes to win, and is still holding a lead in the polls. As has been mentioned, there's always a certain chunk of the electorate who vote decidedly Lifetime channel. But I think the notion that the majority of America votes this way can be safely put to bed.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 1:28 PM on August 30, 2008


But I think the notion that the majority of America votes this way can be safely put to bed.

Point well taken. Yet, many do vote on the "identity" and the "life story" without really understanding the issues, etc. Let's hope it truly is different this time around.
posted by ericb at 1:31 PM on August 30, 2008


McCain's Decision: Game-changing Move or Gimmick?
“The case for Palin.
For McCain, the biggest thing Sarah Palin brings is buzz. It's something the campaign has been seeking for some time. In fact, it has bothered Team McCain that it doesn’t get the same ‘gee whiz’ kind of coverage that Obama gets. Palin changes that discrepancy -- for now. She also helps McCain re-introduce himself as a change-reform candidate. Palin's whole shtick in Alaska is reformer; it's what got her into the governors mansion. Indeed, the Palin pick may signal that the McCain folks have concluded that ‘experience’ as a message isn't a winning one, even though they spent the entire summer developing that argument. So they are hoping Palin helps redefine GOP ticket as change. What's more, she brings a historical first to the McCain campaign. And finally, there's Palin's gender, which the McCain folks hope reopens some of the Clinton-Obama wounds that the Dem convention seemed to heal.
The case against Palin.
The biggest negative about the pick is that on its face, it looks like a political gimmick, a political calculation. And McCain's supposed to be anything but a calculating or gimmicky pol. Indeed, as the Los Angeles Times wonders, isn’t McCain supposed to be the guy putting ‘country first’ and not playing politics? The fact that McCain doesn't know Palin and spent all but a couple of hours getting to know her before making his pick is going to invite A LOT of judgment criticism. The perception is going to be that McCain panicked and wanted to do something radical to shake up the race. Well, he may have shaken up the race, but at the cost of undermining his best asset: that he was ready to lead. This decision doesn't look like it was well thought out, even as Palin has made a tremendous first impression.
The vetting question.
Just how well was she vetted? There's going to be a race to define Palin, and while the McCain has bought time by shocking the world with the pick, there's going to be a lot of interest by the press to dig around in Alaska. And this ‘Troopergate’ story is perhaps just the beginning. What's more, since she isn't well known, any little thing could get blown up pretty quickly.”
posted by ericb at 1:36 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


What other country in the developed world produces beauty queens who hunt caribou and serve up a terrific moose stew? As an immigrant, I'm not saying I came to the United States purely to meet chicks like that, but it was certainly high on my list of priorities. And for the gun-totin' Miss Wasilla then to go on to become Governor while having five kids makes it an even more uniquely American story. Next to her resume, a guy who's done nothing but serve in the phony-baloney job of "community organizer" and write multiple autobiographies looks like just another creepily self-absorbed lifelong member of the full-time political class that infests every advanced democracy
The always amusing Mark Steyn. NB: Link goes to NRO, so if you have some principle about not going there, as I do about Daily Kos, don't click link.
posted by dawson at 1:55 PM on August 30, 2008


Regarding the teen-pregnancy rumors, the Democrats AND liberal websites need to stay far, far away from that one.

I agree 100% because even if it's true... I don't think it hurts her. I think people will see a mom trying to protect her daughter and grandson. I think the "OMG, HER TEENAGE DAUGHTER GOT KNOCKED-UP" sentiment gets lost in the sheer weirdness of the situation.
posted by kimdog at 2:16 PM on August 30, 2008


Regarding the teen-pregnancy rumors, the Democrats AND liberal websites need to stay far, far away from that one.

As Sarah Palin was recognized only as 'Miss Congenialty' in the 'Miss Alaska Beauty Contest,' I was second runner-up in my 7th. Grade Poetry Contest. Hence, I offer you my take on the specious rumor regarding the five-month old child, Trig Palin.

What Child is This?
What child is this, who, laid to rest
On Sarah's lap, is sleeping?
Whom Repubs greet with anthems sweet,
While pollsters watch are keeping?
This, this is McCain’s one hope,
Whom operatives guard and Fox News sings:
Haste, haste to bring him forth,
The Babe, to slay Obama!

So bring him incest, gold, and beer,
Come NASCAR things to own just him,
The one from one (?), freedom rings,
Let loving hearts think he’s of her.
Raise, raise the song on high,
But isn’t he from Bristol’s thigh?
Joy, joy, for Trig is born,
The Babe, the Grandson of sweet Sarah!

posted by ericb at 2:22 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I further support the "leave Brixton alone" sentiment. Appearing to attack the children of prominent politicians is still icky. I'm looking at you Mr. "Janet Reno was her father" McCain.
posted by Joey Michaels at 2:24 PM on August 30, 2008


The much-smarter powers behind the party selected Palin for a purpose

That's not my sense at all. I think that the powers behind the party are sitting this one out and McCain is running the show. How else can you explain the flubs, the bizarre platform of running on Bush's economic plan, touting the Iraq war as won and otherwise offering no other policy proposals other than to snipe and snark at Obama.

If he wanted a serious woman politico as his running mate, he would have picked Kay Bailey Hutchison. Personally, I can't stand her, but she's a much more serious and sober choice than Palin. I suspect that Hutchison wanted nothing to do with him.

I really think his list was very short, only because a lot of prominent Republicans opted out of it. There's nothing to be gained from being his running mate. Barring any kind of major revelation about Obama in the next three months, he will surely lose, the only question left is by how much, and his running mate will be tainted forever.

I think that in Palin, he found someone with more ambition than brains (a kindred spirit in that way), and that it was 100% his own choice.
posted by psmealey at 2:28 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Next to her resume, a guy who's done nothing but serve in the phony-baloney job of "community organizer" and write multiple autobiographies looks like just another creepily self-absorbed lifelong member of the full-time political class that infests every advanced democracy

Spoken like a true member of the tax-cuts-for-me-first,-then-fuck-the-poor class.
posted by psmealey at 2:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain's trophy wife bought him a private jet so that he could fly around the country and denounce his opponent as an elitist.

I think you have it backwards. When they married, McCain was the trophy husband.
posted by MegoSteve at 2:46 PM on August 30, 2008


It's simply absurd to think that anyone's sitting this one out. The presidency is arguably the most powerful office in the country, why wouldn't the Republicans have their best and brightest out front fighting to take it? Anyone talking about McCain's VP choice being a crazy mistake or his own folly is about as misinformed and ignorant of the issues as the people who will end up voting Republican this year against their own interests.

I'm as confident as anyone in the Obama team's organizational abilities, but I've learned never to underestimate the other team when it comes to campaigning.
posted by palidor at 2:52 PM on August 30, 2008


The presidency is arguably the most powerful office in the country, why wouldn't the Republicans have their best and brightest out front fighting to take it?

Well, clearly they don't. So, explain, please.
posted by psmealey at 2:55 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Also, my "misinformed and ignorant" comment isn't intended to be mean-spirited. I just get the feeling sometimes that there's a lot of overconfidence and glossing over the fact that people vote for many different reasons; it's not just about which candidate has the best solutions or is the most dignified. The point about Democrats treating voters as if they're intelligent when they're not can't be repeated enough (although I wouldn't say voters are idiots so much as they're ignorant).
posted by palidor at 3:02 PM on August 30, 2008


FOX News' Alan Colmes: Conservative Family Values.
"In her speech in Dayton today, Gov. Sarah Palin announced that she and her husband are celebrating their 20th wedding anniversary, which means they were married on August 29, 1988.

On April 20, 1989 – less than eight months after they eloped – their first son, Track, was born.

I think I can guess the real reason why they eloped, and it wasn’t to save money on an expensive wedding."
posted by ericb at 3:06 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Right; I've been sensing mainly confusion on the part of McCain's advisers over the pick. There are multiple quotes from aides that are the public-eye-friendlified version of 'WHAT. THE. FUCK. McCAIN?" There's also stuff like the Karl Rove clip criticizing Kaine that make the key strategists sound scarily flip-floppy in the immediate wake of this. I think this was McCain's personal doing - he decided to 'be the maverick' and not consult his people at all. The other people in the VP running sound like they're actively pissed. If the choice does end up going badly in the public eye, I think we can expect some good infighting within Camp McCain.

And the best response is, I think, that McCain is obviously rolling the dice here. We don't need a president who plays dice with the fate of the country.
posted by kaibutsu at 3:07 PM on August 30, 2008


I would agree with that to some degree. I think the bigger problem is not that McCain is so much a formidable candidate (he's, in fact, terrible... weaker than Dole, Dukakis and Kerry), it's that Obama is also running against the mainstream media. The media has, all summer long, been doing that very thing they did in 2000 and 2004 where they repeat rumor, innuendo, and spiteful remarks as though they have equal counterweight to his policy details.

The only thing that stands in the way of this really being a relatively easy victory for Obama is this point: the accusation always appears on Page 1, and the retraction/correction invariably appears on Page 4 in tiny type.
posted by psmealey at 3:08 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Anyone talking about McCain's VP choice being a crazy mistake or his own folly is about as misinformed and ignorant of the issues as the people who will end up voting Republican this year against their own interests.

Do you know something about Palin we don't? Is she really Karl Rove in a mask? Because I don't think people across the country are scratching their heads over this choice for nothing.

It's not like the Republicans are infallable or something, incapable of making poor choices that lead to election defeats, and we seriously need to get over this attitude that the Dems are somehow up against a formidable opponent just because he's a Republican. It's defeatist, for one, and contradictory to what's been going on in this country since 2006 to present. McCain's been floundering and bumbling all spring and summer, and then, true to his love of a crap shoot, decides to take a shot like this. There's a reason this move confuses people, and it's because for all intents and purposes it does look desperate. "But- but McCain is a Republican! Surely there must be some higher, mysterious, secret power at work that we're just not seeing." No, sometimes a bad move is just a bad move.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 3:09 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Surprise? First Two National Polls Find Palin Gains LESS Support from Women.
posted by ericb at 3:09 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


I would argue the fact that (up until the Dem convention) the polls were tied shows that the Republicans are running a fine campaign. With Bush's approval ratings so low, an unpopular war going on, an uncertain economy, and so on, you would expect the opposition party to have a clear lead, and they don't.

It's almost as if, with all of the media coverage Obama's been getting this year, he's the incumbent. Using all of the "it's the Dem's to lose" talk, the Republicans have turned the campaign into a referendum on Obama, rather than on Bush, who has been mostly out of the picture since the campaign started.
posted by palidor at 3:12 PM on August 30, 2008


Could she be a political bridge builder?

Palin Repeatedly Professed Desire To Renew Federal Funding For ‘Bridge To Nowhere’
posted by ericb at 3:17 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin On Iraq
"A reader has found some evidence that [Palin] has thought about foreign policy at some point in her 44 years. Drum roll, please:
'Alaska Business Monthly: We've lost a lot of Alaska's military members to the war in Iraq. How do you feel about sending more troops into battle, as President Bush is suggesting?

Palin: I've been so focused on state government, I haven't really focused much on the war in Iraq. I heard on the news about the new deployments, and while I support our president, Condoleezza Rice and the administration, I want to know that we have an exit plan in place; I want assurances that we are doing all we can to keep our troops safe. Every life lost is such a tragedy. I am very, very proud of the troops we have in Alaska, those fighting overseas for our freedoms, and the families here who are making so many sacrifices.'
She heard about the surge, McCain's campaign centerpiece, on the news. Does she still favor an exit plan?
posted by ericb at 3:23 PM on August 30, 2008


I'm really not trying to be defeatist. Like I said, I have confidence in the Obama campaign's organizational abilities, which probably does more to win elections than VP picks or media smears.

My first reaction to McCain's choice was that it was a cynical grab for female and evangelical votes, and why wouldn't it work? If you were one of those groups and you were going to sit out the election, wouldn't it do a little to get you out to vote in November? I mean, I honestly don't know, but I really doubt that this was a random, last minute decision that no one but McCain wanted.

I do think there's strategy behind it, because like I said, this is a really high stakes game with a lot of money involved. No one is going to take any of it lightly.
posted by palidor at 3:24 PM on August 30, 2008


delmoi: "The average American doesn't fall for that bullshit. Now there certainly may be some below average people out there who will be fooled, and unfortunately they make up a key swing demographic: People to stupid to know what's going on. A lot of the campaign is tailored to them and it gives people the impression that the entire country is retarded.

But in fact it's just a key swing demographic, just like old people in Florida, Soccer Moms, etc.
"

Candidates Compete For Vital "Idgit" Vote
posted by Rhaomi at 3:28 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Well, clearly they don't. So, explain, please.

They need a moron on the ticket. Like Klang said, morons decide presidential elections in this country. And THE defining characteristic of the American Moron is this belief that we need an "average Joe" running the country. Like Bush.

See it's like this: Morons love to think they could run the country because all the real solutions to our problems don't take nuance or strategy. No. To the American Moron our solutions come from bold decisive "common sense" action. Self awareness, strategic analysis and corrective action are seen as a weekness for egg-heads.

And this, my friends, is why the American Morons have bad jobs, pathetic selfish consumer driven lives, and are the constant "victims" of history who blame everybody else for their problems.
posted by tkchrist at 3:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [7 favorites]


Accusing your opponents and their supporters of being idiots is not an effective electoral strategy.
posted by EarBucket at 3:36 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Also, the media response to the pick plays right into the whole maverick thing, thus reinforcing McCain's image for undecided voters. And, as said upthread (probably a thousand times), Palin's "neighborly" image will prevent Dems from attacking hard because it can be perceived as a slight against the voters that identify with her. And we know who the sexy librarians are going to be voting for now...
posted by palidor at 3:40 PM on August 30, 2008


I already trademarked the phrase, "Don't blame me, I voted for Obama." So don't try stealin' it. Yeah, I'm lookin' your direction.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 3:41 PM on August 30, 2008


And we know who the sexy librarians are going to be voting for now

Obama?
posted by cillit bang at 3:52 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I know all of the "idiot" talk comes out of a very real frustration with how some people vote (and act, but that's a whole other thousand-comment thread), but it gets us nowhere indeed. Maybe it's because I grew up in a small town in Ohio, and was surrounded by your typical beer-chugging Nascar anti-intellectuals, but eventually I realized that hating on this (very large) group of people does absolutely nothing to further your cause, and most of the time just alienates you from constructive efforts to inform and educate. I get frustrated as well, but assuming someone behaves the way they do because they're an idiot is pretty simple-minded, which is indeed ironic!
posted by palidor at 3:56 PM on August 30, 2008


Hate to tell you guys this but putting her on the ticket has electrified the Republicans and church folk here. I mean, they are stoked.
posted by konolia at 3:59 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


There's a reason this move confuses people, and it's because for all intents and purposes it does look desperate. "But- but McCain is a Republican! Surely there must be some higher, mysterious, secret power at work that we're just not seeing." No, sometimes a bad move is just a bad move.

It appears that McCain had Joe Lieberman as his first choice, but Rove squelched the idea, presumably because a pro-choice Jew would not make the GOP base happy, no matter how hawkish he is. I think Rove required McCain to have an anti-abortion running mate, but that McCain had some leeway in who he could pick, based on personal chemistry. (Practically speaking, the short-tempered McCain is not going to be able to campaign effectively with somebody he can't stand.) It looks like McCain wanted a choice that was a demographic game-changer, which means he needed somebody nonwhite or a white woman. If he picked nonwhite males who oppose abortion, such as Bobby Jindal or Alan Keyes, he would undercut mobilization by racists and nativists who hate Obama for being "different." So the choices left are Republican white women. The problem for McCain is that the most competent pool of potential female VP candidates for the GOP are largely pro-choice (Kay Bailey Hutchison, Olympia Snowe, Carly Fiorina, Susan Collins, Jodi Rell, etc. etc.). Palin was probably one of the only possible choices left if you impose both Rove's condition (no pro-choicers) and McCain's condition (need an unconventional choice to "shake things up") on the selection process.

I think another simple factor is also at play. I think McCain simply ran out of time. The rules of major party conventions require a vice-presidential nominee to be selected before the convention is over. (That's why George McGovern's choice of Thomas Eagleton in 1972 proved to be such a disaster. Read Nixonland if you want more info on the backroom dealings.) Running out of time certainly provides a plausible explanation for why McCain selected Palin after only meeting her once. In addition, McCain made his decision, because he wanted to preempt coverage of Obama's acceptance speech. The gambit worked in the short-term, but I think Obama's speech might have intimidated other GOP politicians from taking on the VP job. Even the most minimal vetting should have found major drawbacks to choosing Palin. Even if they decided to pick Palin despite the drawbacks, better vetting would have allowed them to anticipate some of the negative coverage already coming out about her.

It's a simple analogy. Palin:McCain::Eagleton:McGovern
posted by jonp72 at 3:59 PM on August 30, 2008 [12 favorites]


Marisa Stole The Precious Thing: "Dick and Jane American would never make a black man a viable candidate" - "Dick and Jane American would never vote for a guy with 'Hussein' for a middle name" - "Dick and Jane American in Iowa are going to put some old white guy in the forefront, Obama's done."

And do you honestly think it's "intellectual snobbery" to go after someone's lack of experience?


I'm talking about how Dick and Jane will react to the rank-and-file Democrats sneering at Palin for having been a beauty contestant and not having a degree from a "respectable" college. Not about their reactions to Obama himself. Of course going after Palin's lack of experience isn't intellectual snobbery. I hope to God that Obama, Biden, and rank and file Democrats hammer away at it.

My point was that quite a few rank and file Obama supporters seem to have trouble keeping sneers out of the critiques they're trumpeting. Obama's charisma, intelligence, and grace has earned him a historic place in this election narrative, and by virtue of being unprecedented, that place is tenuous. The tone, as well as the substance, of his supporters' critiques will affect whether people on the fence will want to vote for him.
posted by cybercoitus interruptus at 3:59 PM on August 30, 2008


By the way, can we can the comments saying she was picked to garner the moron vote?

I think this woman has brains. For those of you who think she is an idiot re such things as foreign policy-please remember that when you are governing a STATE and being a mom at the same time, you tend to focus on that which is important to what you are doing. She needed to be informed on the things pertaining to the job she was doing. This was not a woman seeking to be chosen to be vice president. This was a woman who was doing HER JOB and concentrating on THAT.

Remember also that the other work she has done-such as the commercial fishing-gives her a real perspective on what is important to the average American. That is a perspective that a lot of people inside the Beltway truly lack.

Does this woman have weaknesses as a VP choice? Yes, of course. But she does have strengths. And I for one can't wait to hear what she has to say as she hits the campaign trail.
posted by konolia at 4:08 PM on August 30, 2008


cybercoitus: It's a good point, and I hope Obama's supporters make a point of snickering amongst themselves and following the lead of the campaign when it comes to Palin. I mean, the joke ultimately makes itself, and provides an excellent way to talk about McCain - his age, judgement, and temperament, in particular - without directly attacking Palin. She's irrelevant media-hoopla unless McCain bites it during his first term, in which case he would have fucked the country with his lack of foresight.
posted by kaibutsu at 4:13 PM on August 30, 2008


Enyone hoo dont vote like me is a idiot.
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 4:19 PM on August 30, 2008


1000th comment!
posted by captain cosine at 4:20 PM on August 30, 2008


This was not a woman seeking to be chosen to be vice president. This was a woman who was doing HER JOB and concentrating on THAT.

Then she has a lot of catching up to do, doesn't she?
posted by krinklyfig at 4:24 PM on August 30, 2008


And I for one can't wait to hear what she has to say as she hits the campaign trail.

That makes two of us. My God, the gaffes she is going to make. I'm not saying she's stupid, only that no person on Earth can go from zero to presidential in the amount of time she has. Good gravy.
posted by Bookhouse at 4:24 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


As Bush contemplates taking the stage at the RNC on Monday, Hurricane Gustav bears down on New Orleans, due to arrive on...Monday. Odd coincidence? Bizarrely appropriate twist of fate? Talk about a party facing serious headwinds in their pursuit of the White House!

I'm anti-hurricane, and definitely anti-hurricane-fucking-over-people. That said, my Democratic palate finds the taste of this eerie juxtaposition of events to be rather...delicious. What's the plan? Bush cancels, the governor of Louisiana cancels, and we watch four days of split screen, with half of the screen showing sober-faced bummed-out-looking conservatives and the other half showing a hurricane blowing away New Orleans (and any chances the Republicans might have thought they had)? Is that the plan?

I hear the winds of change a-blowing, and this time they're blowing with hurricane force!
posted by jamstigator at 4:31 PM on August 30, 2008


Putting. Country. Last.
posted by homunculus at 4:35 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


For those of you who think she is an idiot re such things as foreign policy-please remember that when you are governing a STATE and being a mom at the same time

There are quite few a mothers who keep up with current events, including foreign policy, who would find this characterization insulting.
posted by jonp72 at 4:39 PM on August 30, 2008 [10 favorites]


Hate to tell you guys this but putting her on the ticket has electrified the Republicans and church folk here. I mean, they are stoked.

Hate to tell you guys this but putting her on the ticket has electrified the Democrats and educated folk here. I mean, they are stoked. She'll sink the Republicans this election!
posted by ericb at 4:39 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


She's an interesting choice, and only time will tell the outcome, but there's no doubt she's a gamble. The Republicans can take that chance, because they've never been ahead in this race. The pick of McCain was something of a retirement gift, IMO, and the party doesn't necessarily expect him to win, and he doesn't really have the hard right in his corner. If he loses, they figure, at least he'll shut up about running for president, and the most conservative forces want him done with, though they'll take a puppet. So, yeah, a hail Mary type strategy. I don't think that's a controversial observation.

The realists within the party figure this one was lost years ago and are not happy today, but hope to put Bush behind them as quickly as possible and rebuild the party with a different direction. Rove and his ilk are powerful, however, and they will have a hard time letting go of their populist leanings. If McCain loses, the realists have an opening, though it's a bit odd because he used to be more in the realist camp than he is today. And the neocons are not really popular anymore with the realists and party elders, so this feels like a last shot before rebuilding.

The Democrats, for their part, need to remember that McCain still could win, particularly if the Republicans can create the dominant narrative, and Palin does help with that. But they can only do this if we never get below the surface, and I don't think the dynamics of the national conversation are the same as they were in 2004.
posted by krinklyfig at 4:42 PM on August 30, 2008


There are quite few a mothers who keep up with current events, including foreign policy, who would find this characterization insulting

Are any of those mothers you are invoking women who are also at present sitting governors of a state? Who one would think would be concentrating on the issues and problemsolving relevant to said state?

I keep up with current events. I even did it while working and parenting three small children.

But I was NOT an elected chief executive of a state.
posted by konolia at 4:45 PM on August 30, 2008


As Bush contemplates taking the stage at the RNC on Monday, Hurricane Gustav bears down on New Orleans, due to arrive on...Monday. Odd coincidence?

No. No coincidence at all. Like Katrina it's all because of the filthy gays and their annual Southern Decadence parade.

No comment from Republicans Larry Craig (whose bathroom stall at the St.Paul/Minneapolis Airport this weekend is considered a Republican Shrine to hot man-sex), Mark Foley, Rev. Ted Haggard, Bob Allen and Glenn Murphy Jr.
posted by ericb at 4:46 PM on August 30, 2008


Remember also that the other work she has done-such as the commercial fishing-gives her a real perspective on what is important to the average American. That is a perspective that a lot of people inside the Beltway truly lack.

Really? You're including commercial fishing as part of her resume? Republicans generally don't count Obama's effective record as a community organizer, editor of the Harvard Law Review, professor of constitutional law, or his 7 years as a state legislator. And none of these things were "inside the Beltway." You can't just change the goalposts anytime you feel like it, because it's convenient for the candidate you favor.
posted by jonp72 at 4:47 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Presidential scholars say she appears to be the least experienced, least credentialed person to join a major-party ticket in the modern era.

" “It would be one thing if she had only been governor for a year and a half, but prior to that she had not had major experience in public life,” said Dallek of Palin. “The fact that he would have to go to somebody who is clearly unqualified to be president makes Obama look like an elder statesman.”

And Alaska is a much smaller state than Illinois, the political base of Barack Obama, whom Republicans have repeatedly criticized for being inexperienced, having served nearly four years in the U.S. Senate after eight in the Illinois state Senate."
posted by cashman at 4:49 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I keep up with current events. I even did it while working and parenting three small children.

But I was NOT an elected chief executive of a state.


Stop the anti-intellectualism. If somebody has enough talent to get elected governor of a state, they should keep up with current events too, especially if they're on the short list for the second-highest job in the country. That they choose not to do so, because they want to pander to the anti-intellectual and parochial prejudices of people in their own home state is not a virtue in a VP candidate.
posted by jonp72 at 4:50 PM on August 30, 2008 [7 favorites]


Capnjoy on Palin: my first reaction, honestly, was kind of giddy. i thought the choice showed desperation & would straightjacket mccain's offense against obama.

which is all true.

but a few hours later, i'm finding the choice depressing. not only because of it's based on an insultingly reductive understanding of female voters (samantha bee's piece on this was hilarious, btw). but because, in these very early hours, the media seems to be buying the mccain campaign's line about palin & obama's "inexperience" being comparable.

which is, of course, total BS.

barack obama is preparED to be president because he has dedicated himself to preparING. he's an astute and supple thinker who has applied himself to understanding the complexities of the issues facing America and to formulating forward-thinking policy in response. my favorite illustration of his competence is the lead from this article from the jerusalem post.

sarah palin has not prepared herself to step onto the national stage. in 2007, she admitted she had no opinions about iraq. she hasn't spent the time in-between studying up: her remarks on iraq in a time mag interview from 2 weeks ago she are meandering and baffling. her signature domestic policy platform seems to be a short-sighted embrace of drilling, a stance that's obviously inadequate to our long-term energy needs.

andrew sullivan is right: mccain's showing a profound misunderstanding of his opponent. and i hope the media isn't suckered into making the same mistake.

posted by chuckdarwin at 4:53 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


I keep up with current events. I even did it while working and parenting three small children.

But I was NOT an elected chief executive of a state.


So? Am I supposed to pity her?

Hey, good for her for working so hard and being accomplished. But I haven't heard anything from her that gives me confidence she could run this country. We've just met her, but I don't see the spark there, the feeling you get about some people that they will do great (or at least hugely influential) things.
posted by krinklyfig at 4:55 PM on August 30, 2008


jonp72: You can't just change the goalposts anytime you feel like it, because it's convenient for the candidate you favor.

Sure you can. Haven't you paid any attention these past 8 years?
posted by sour cream at 5:03 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Really? You're including commercial fishing as part of her resume? Republicans generally don't count Obama's effective record as a community organizer, editor of the Harvard Law Review, professor of constitutional law, or his 7 years as a state legislator. And none of these things were "inside the Beltway." You can't just change the goalposts anytime you feel like it, because it's convenient for the candidate you favor.

The fact you just wrote that lets me know you missed my point entirely.


If somebody has enough talent to get elected governor of a state, they should keep up with current events too, especially if they're on the short list for the second-highest job in the country

Do you have any evidence that she honestly thought she had a snowball's chance in hell of getting on this ticket before a few days ago?

The difference between her and a lot of folks in politics is that this woman was not looking to the next rung in the ladder instead of concentrating on the job at hand. (*cough* John Edwards *cough*) I find that refreshing.

And I have a feeling there are others who will feel the same.
posted by konolia at 5:03 PM on August 30, 2008


The information that her daughter Bristol is the actual mother of Trig, the "fifth child" of Palin is getting some legs. I am staying tuned. Interesting times ahead.
posted by trii at 5:07 PM on August 30, 2008


I would argue the fact that (up until the Dem convention) the polls were tied shows that the Republicans are running a fine campaign.

I would argue the fact that the polls were tied is evidence that the polls are a tool of the media used to create "excitement" and "competition" and "news" where there is none.

I mean, seriously, half your population is so dumbfuck retarded that they're going to vote for McCain? I really can not believe that. The survival of the country is at stake and even though it would really suck to be a Republican that has to eat his pride and vote for Obama this one-and-only-time, it would really suck to be a Republican who is responsible for putting McCain into the Presidency and the US further down the toilet.
posted by five fresh fish at 5:13 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


1000th comment!

A thousand points of blight...
posted by mazola at 5:14 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Do you have any evidence that she honestly thought she had a snowball's chance in hell of getting on this ticket before a few days ago?

That's not an argument in her favor!
posted by Bookhouse at 5:19 PM on August 30, 2008 [8 favorites]


Really? You're including commercial fishing as part of her resume? Republicans generally don't count Obama's effective record as a community organizer, editor of the Harvard Law Review, professor of constitutional law, or his 7 years as a state legislator. And none of these things were "inside the Beltway." You can't just change the goalposts anytime you feel like it, because it's convenient for the candidate you favor.

The fact you just wrote that lets me know you missed my point entirely.


I think I got your point just fine. Before picking Palin, McCain insisted that Obama did not have enough conventional Washington experience to be president. On the other hand, McCain is also insistent that the best possible person to succeed him as Commander-in-Chief in the event of his death or incapacitation is somebody who has both less Washington D.C. experience than Obama and less experience in state government as well. This is especially galling, because experience has been a main theme of McCain's campaign, while Obama's campaign stresses the importance of judgment over experience. If Obama has non-Washington experience, you see that as proof of his unfitness for the job. But when you point to Palin's non-Washington experience, you call it "refreshing."
posted by jonp72 at 5:19 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


Palin Was Excited That Obama Was Edging Ahead Of McCain In Alaska

Before she was running against him, Sarah Palin--the governor of Alaska and now the Republican candidate for Vice-President of the United States--thought it was pretty neat that Barack Obama was edging ahead of John McCain in her usually solidly red state. After all, she said, Obama's campaign was using the same sort of language that she had in her gubernatorial race. "The theme of our campaign was 'new energy,' " she said recently. "It was no more status quo, no more politics as usual, it was all about change. So then to see that Obama--literally, part of his campaign uses those themes, even, new energy, change, all that, I think, O.K., well, we were a little bit ahead on that." She also noted, "Something's kind of changing here in Alaska, too, for being such a red state on the Presidential level. Obama's doing just fine in polls up here, which is kind of wigging people out, because they're saying, 'This hasn't happened for decades that in polls the D' "--the Democratic candidate--" 'is doing just fine.' To me, that's indicative, too. It's the no-more-status-quo, it's change."
posted by cashman at 5:19 PM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


I mean, really, konolia. Would you want support taking someone completely out of the blue and putting them in charge of, say, the disposal of nuclear waste? Or, for that matter, in charge of a nuclear weapons stockpile? It belittles the importance of the job and the importance of this moment in our nation's history to say that this person is in any way ready to lead the country. Or that she even has a chance to be in 140 days. Even if not actively gunning for the Presidency, people who want to be a part of national politics should make some effort to prepare for their part once they get there. This means knowing the problems of their (NATIONAL) constituencies and, if looking for any kind of internationally important role, doing at least some reading on the state of world affairs. Even if you do scoff at ambition, I hope you don't scoff at the notion of picking people qualified for important positions. (And yes, given McCain's age and medical history, the vice presidency is an important position.)

She had chosen her place in the world: she could have been an excellent Alaskan statesperson for the rest of her years, and/or transitioned onto the national stage with a bit more time. But now she has accepted a nomination that makes her a strange fish in extremely unfamiliar waters. She has CHOSEN to accept this, and either doesn't realize or has chosen to ignore her lack of preparation and qualifications. I'm not sure which speaks worse of her, frankly.
posted by kaibutsu at 5:27 PM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


For those of you who think she is an idiot re such things as foreign policy-please remember that when you are governing a STATE and being a mom at the same time, you tend to focus on that which is important to what you are doing.

In all fairness, her state has a population equal to only two thirds of the COUNTY I live in. Shoot, Obama's district when he was in the IL senate had a higher population by over a hundred thousand people. Most governors of far more populous and demanding states seem to be able to keep up with basic current events and political news.
posted by Kellydamnit at 5:27 PM on August 30, 2008


jonp72 made a very astute point, konolia.
posted by agregoli at 5:31 PM on August 30, 2008


It appears konolia and her church gang are single-issue voters. Having an anti-abortionist as a potential VP makes the giddy with excitement.

Single issue voters are the death of the country. There are a dozen far more important issues than the one of Roe vs. Wade remaining status-quo for another four years. The end of the USA as a viable nation is creeping closer: the economic ruin, the endless mid-East war, and the rumblings of Russia are all things that can make or break the USA. Abortion is piffle by comparision.

Everyone needs to vote smarter this time around. Eat humble pie, put Obama into place for four years, purge and scour the corrupt Republican party, and come around in 2012 with a good candidate. It is the one and only sensible course of action.
posted by five fresh fish at 5:31 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Do you have any evidence that she honestly thought she had a snowball's chance in hell of getting on this ticket before a few days ago?

The difference between her and a lot of folks in politics is that this woman was not looking to the next rung in the ladder instead of concentrating on the job at hand. (*cough* John Edwards *cough*) I find that refreshing.


This website has been pushing a "Draft Sarah Palin for VP" campaign since 2007. In addition, online prediction markets showed a lot of enthusiasm about Palin in the months before McCain made the selection, although Romney and Pawlenty often traded for higher share prices. I agree that Palin would have been reasonable in thinking that her selection as VP would be implausible, but she should have had some inkling that it was a possibility, however slim. You'd think she'd want to be somewhat prepared, if only to make sure she didn't make her political party look foolish. That's not ambition. That's just being prepared.

Answer me this. Would you be gushing about how refreshing Sarah Palin is and making so many rationalizations for her weak qualifications if she were a pro-choice agnostic?
posted by jonp72 at 5:32 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wow ... there is some serious crazy going on in this thread. A few thoughts:

1) There is not going to be a "bait and switch". There is no secret Old White Guy they're going to roll out a few weeks before the election. It's an insane idea, and would make them look like idiots. Palin really is the VP candidate. Really.

2) She has both her strengths and her weaknesses. But there are strengths. It seems obvious to me that she was picked to appeal to both right-wingers and independents, which she does, and maybe pick up some disaffected Clinton supporters in the bargain if they're lucky. Try to think of another candidate who does all that at once. It's not easy.

3) Don't assume that she will be a gaffe machine a la Dan Quayle. She might be. She might not be. Dan Quayle was a drag on the ticket (and he was, even though they won) because he was an idiot, not because he was inexperienced. Do not assume that she will be an idiot. Too many people are assuming that, and if she proves to be a reasonably good campaigner after all, the press will treat her as golden because of it.

4) However, she does have her drawbacks. Her lack of experience leaves her open to attack, and might (*might*) result in her looking like she doesn't know much about some important issues. The ongoing ethics scandal might (*might*) blow up in her face. Her choice does seem to mitigate the attacks on Obama's experience, but not entirely -- she is running for VP, not president.

But honestly ...

Whether she's a good pick or not is going to depend almost entirely on how she does on the campaign trail. All this speculation beforehand on how she's going to be received is just that ... speculation. She could be a drag on the ticket. She could be a shot in the arm for the ticket. But we don't know because, unlike Biden, she is an unknown quantity.

Wait and see, people. Don't bet for or against her until you've seen her run for awhile.
posted by kyrademon at 5:40 PM on August 30, 2008 [7 favorites]


By the way, can we can the comments saying she was picked to garner the moron vote?

I think this woman has brains.


Why on earth would you think those things don't go together?

Remember also that the other work she has done-such as the commercial fishing-gives her a real perspective on what is important to the average American.

So you're saying that what's important to the average American is commercial fishing, beauty pageants, and running small towns into debt. Gotcha.

I'm curious how on earth you would think that commercial fishing, of all things, would help one to understand where the average American is coming from.

A job that only 2881 people in the US actually held in 2005 helps you understand what's important to normal people.

Uh-huh.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 5:43 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


If someone is campaigning for the presidency or vice presidency, there's an extra twist. That person has to have a line of argument to offer on any conceivable issue. Quick, without pausing in the next ninety seconds, tell me what you think about: the balance of relations between Taiwan and mainland China, and exactly what signals we're sending to Hamas, and what we think about Russia's role in the G-8 and potentially in NATO, and where North Korea stands on its nuclear pledges -- plus Iran while we're at it, plus the EU after the Irish vote, plus cap-and-trade as applied to India and China, and what's the right future for South Ossetia; and let's not even start on domestic issues.
posted by EarBucket at 5:44 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


I would argue the fact that the polls were tied is evidence that the polls are a tool of the media used to create "excitement" and "competition" and "news" where there is none.

I agree that the polls are used as a tool in the media narrative, which then affects how polls are responded to, as a sort of feedback loop, but you can't possibly believe that all of the independent polling groups are in league with the media to manufacture the numbers, can you?

All I'm saying is that the McCain campaign has been successful in making the election a referendum on Obama, and that they should not be underestimated. They keep up the attacks and put the Democrats in a defensive position, which is valuable in that it controls the media narrative. The polls reflect their success.

I'm a proud Obama supporter, and volunteered for his campaign last week here in Ohio, so I look forward to doing what I can in the next couple of months to get him elected. But I try to hold a more nuanced view and accept the Republican strengths for what they are. Maybe it's irrelevant to see it in those terms because I'm not a campaign strategist, and I should just join the noise machine, I don't know.
posted by palidor at 5:48 PM on August 30, 2008


Palin booed for mentioning Hillary Clinton
posted by jjoye at 5:49 PM on August 30, 2008


So you're saying that what's important to the average American is commercial fishing, beauty pageants, and running small towns into debt. Gotcha.


No, what I AM saying is that she and her husband WERE the average American. She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower. She was no child of privilege born with the proverbial silver spoon. One thing this woman will never do is talk down to America.

She IS America.

(and as to single issue voting-of course I am thrilled with her position re abortion. But I am equally thrilled with her fight against corruption which made her enemies with leaders in her own party. Remember, I am no stranger to the innards of Party politics. What she has managed to accomplish while making the party functionaries unhappy is quite stunning. )
posted by konolia at 5:54 PM on August 30, 2008


For those of you who think she is an idiot re such things as foreign policy-please remember that when you are governing a STATE and being a mom at the same time, you tend to focus on that which is important to what you are doing.

Other governors with kids seem to be conversant with foreign policy.

For a governor from a coastal and border state to be unfamiliar with foreign policy seems downright baffling.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 5:54 PM on August 30, 2008


2 Top Alaska Newspapers Question Palin's Fitness.
posted by ericb at 5:54 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


People Magazine: "Do You Feel Ready To Be A Heartbeat Away From The Presidency?"

Palin: "Absolutely. Yup, Yup..."
posted by ericb at 5:57 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin In Pennsylvania: ''It's Great To See Another Part Of The Country."
posted by ericb at 6:00 PM on August 30, 2008


No, what I AM saying is that she and her husband WERE the average American.

Then you're saying that the average American wins beauty pageants and holds down astonishingly rare jobs? That being married to a commercial fisherman makes her better able to understand what office workers and retail salespeople and such go through?

Uh-huh.

She was no child of privilege born with the proverbial silver spoon.

As opposed to who exactly?

I often get annoyed with five fresh fish's constant YOU MUST DO BETTER THAN THIS AMERICA routine, but... geez.

You really can't see that her life has almost nothing in common with the lives of average Americans? Really? You honestly think that Average Joe is out there in his catcherboat headed to the factory ship, not pushing paper in an 8-5 or hawking retail goods or building houses? Really?
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 6:04 PM on August 30, 2008


Do you have any evidence that she honestly thought she had a snowball's chance in hell of getting on this ticket before a few days ago?

It doesn't matter why she's not prepared, only that she is. This isn't a high school algebra test. This is the potential Head of State and Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful country the world has ever seen.
posted by dirigibleman at 6:08 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Do you have any evidence that she honestly thought she had a snowball's chance in hell of getting on this ticket before a few days ago?

The difference between her and a lot of folks in politics is that this woman was not looking to the next rung in the ladder instead of concentrating on the job at hand. (*cough* John Edwards *cough*) I find that refreshing.


Hit the nail on the head! She was being down to earth and practical. She wasn't all high and mighty, wasting time doing all that research, formulating policy strategies and following the issues a VP ought to, because who woulda thunk? So now she's totally unprepared for the monstrous job she's applying for, and I find that refreshing.

Indulgent sarcasm aside, I don't doubt she's a smart lady. But if someone asked me, out of nowhere, "Hey, wanna be Vice-President?" I'd respond "Yeah! Well, actually no, I don't think I can do that. Can I take a raincheck though?" She answered, "Hey what the hell. I'll pick it up as I go along," which would be an awesome new campaign slogan. She was justfied in focusing only on her state. She had her name in the running as a career/name recognition strategy, not a crime. She however accepted the nomination.

Would you box with Mike Tyson in 140 days?
Would you perform open heart surgery in 140 days?
Would you pilot an Airbus 380 in 140 days?
posted by damo at 6:09 PM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


"Pro-life"?

Abortion is a non-issue, at least as far as national and international politics goes. Perhaps it's a sign of the insularity of a lot of the United States, I don't know. I mean, I don't know whether the United States is really as insular as it seems to be. Though it seems to be autistically so in places.

The United States is an imperial power in decline, in that difficult stage before the next imperial power really manifests itself (everybody is saying China, but I'm not sure). It is theoretically possible to negotiate with the situation to get out with some dignity intact, but it takes diplomacy and tact (and even with very skilled diplomats, my own country left all manner of dreadfulness across its own former possessions and had a tough time getting used to its reduced status), whereas for the last eight years the U.S. has been led by an oligarchy who have pissed away its money, the considerable goodwill generated by the 9/11 attacks, the lives of its young people (and the people of other countries) and the last of its international political reputation, largely (as far as I can tell), to stuff the wallets of oil barons and war profiteers. McCain represents a continuation of that policy of self-abuse.

It's not a question of left or right: Bush has been a catastrophe for your country. McCain will continue that catastrophe all the way down into the toilet. Obama... might not be a disaster, I don't know. Possibly not a disaster is the best you can hope for at the moment.

With the stakes as they are, though, how a candidate feels about abortion is as relevant as how they feel about traffic violations or littering.

(Actually, Obama looks like the real deal from over here. But then so did Blair for a while.)
posted by Grangousier at 6:10 PM on August 30, 2008 [18 favorites]


Single issue voters are the death of the country. There are a dozen far more important issues than the one of Roe vs. Wade remaining status-quo for another four years.

Well, the way that the republicans plan on overturning Roe v. Wade is by placing conservative judges on the bench in the mold of Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas. That kind of thing would have wide-ranging consequences far beyond abortion.
posted by delmoi at 6:12 PM on August 30, 2008


For some of us who view abortion as the holocaust it is, it is very much an issue.

A lot of us pray for the mercy of God to be poured out on this country because we know just how much we deserve judgement.
posted by konolia at 6:13 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower.

That's too bad. Those people are really good at running things.
posted by Lentrohamsanin at 6:14 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


Undecideds don't like her.

Would you box with Mike Tyson in 140 days?
Would you perform open heart surgery in 140 days?
Would you pilot an Airbus 380 in 140 days?


Yeah. Oh, and while you're preparing to do these things, you will be appearing at campaign events and flying all over the country.
posted by Bookhouse at 6:16 PM on August 30, 2008


Would you box with Mike Tyson in 140 days? ... Would you perform open heart surgery in 140 days? ... Would you pilot an Airbus 380 in 140 days?

Fuck, yeah! I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night!
posted by ericb at 6:18 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


And traffic violations kill a lot of people. But they don't bring down empires.
posted by Grangousier at 6:19 PM on August 30, 2008


I'm sure konolia's comments will be met with much restraint as abortion, the religious issue that it really is, is futile to discuss in any sort of logical manner (especially on the Internet).
posted by palidor at 6:19 PM on August 30, 2008


One thing this woman will never do is talk down to America.

She IS America.


"The times are too serious, the stakes are too high for this same partisan playbook. So let us agree that patriotism has no party. I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain.

The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and independents, but they have fought together, and bled together, and some died together under the same proud flag. They have not served a red America or a blue America; they have served the United States of America.

So I’ve got news for you, John McCain: We all put our country first." --Barack Obama

America is bigger than all of us.
posted by jonp72 at 6:21 PM on August 30, 2008 [5 favorites]


Enyone hoo dont vote like me is a idiot.

I'm just using this as an example of some fucking dumb-ass knee-jerk contrarian reductive thinking that is infuriating about Metafilter. The comment or the commenter themselves may not be. But I'm still using it.

And here is my point:

Yes. Anybody that voted for Bush in 2004 was either a complete god damned moron or had some vested financial interest in continuing the most obviously disastrous "mal-competent" policies in modern US history. AND THE REPUBLICANS KNEW THAT. The mobilizing issues: Flag burning? Gay marriage? Immigration?

Are you fucking kidding me?

The Republican party of the last twenty five years has deliberately and meticuoulsy created a climate of manufactured stupidity in this country. The destruction of public education, conflating creation myth with science, and the elimination of public service as a virtue. The promotion of selfishness and intolerance as values.

All this was done in order to push legislation that no thinking person (who is not of the entrenched power establishment) would ever consider. Old school Republicans, William Buckley/Barry Goldwater Republicans, were a dying breed the new republican, particularly of the last ten years, is a reactionary simpleton living in a mythical America who repeatedly act against thier own long term self interest.

Fuck this mamby-pamby tip toeing around the truth. These fuckers ARE stupid. Pretending they are not is not going to help us. You want to educate you have to identify the problem. These dangerous dip shits are not going to educate themselves.

Wake up. The stupidity level in this country has just about reached an unrecoverable critical mass. I think McCain is gonna win. I do. God I hope not. But this Polly Anna attitude pretending "hey, it's just a different point of view, man" is frigg'n cultural suicide. Progressives better wake up and stay the fuck on message and be ruthless or this country is lost for another two or three generations. And by then you can say hello to the new Third Word America.
posted by tkchrist at 6:23 PM on August 30, 2008 [36 favorites]


She was no child of privilege born with the proverbial silver spoon.

Such as George W. Bush, John McCain and Cindy Hensley McCain, amirite?
posted by ericb at 6:25 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


One thing this woman will never do is talk down to America.

Oh PAH-LEEEZE.

Her very existence on the ticket is an god damned insult. It's basically a cynical admission that the base constituency of the Republican party are complete idiots.
posted by tkchrist at 6:27 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


I've been stuck at home a bit for the past couple of days waiting on stuff from a client, with a lot more internet time than I've had in a while, so I have spent more time investigating the Palin choice than I would have expected.
I gotta say, this is a very cynical move by the McCain crowd.

She probably excels at the more ceremonial duties of being chief executive, is good at knowing the state reps and senators and delegates well to her staff, but I am reminded of our present president by her comfort in what she does not know.

The quotes cited above regarding the actual job duties of the Vice president and the state of the Iraq war are indicative of a very incurious mind. Hey, I got kids and three clients right now that are like having three jobs, no spouse for back up and still pay attention to world affairs. I listen to the BBC World Service read the New York Times and talk to intelligent people who don't always have the same point of view I have.

I'm not getting a sense of her really being up to the job. She isn't an idiot - she came across fairly well on Charlie Rose - but not up to being a heartbeat away. Look what happened to Bush. He had to rely on others to fill in the overwhelming gaps in his knowledge (remember in an 2000 interview he did not know who Parvez Musharruf was) and so was easily pushed into the debacle we're in now by the neo-cons.

Andrew Sullivan nails it with Putting Country Last

I'd like to think that the electorate would see this for the cynical crap move that it is, but i remember being astounded by Bush's lack of knowledge in the debates and talking to a guy about it who was totally at ease voting for someone with little grasp of politics outside the borders of the US. He liked Bush more for his ignorance - I guess that was his regular guy you could have a beer with quality - but look where that's got us.

The chance that McCain will be voted into office and she could become president is frightening to me, based on what I have seen so far.
posted by readery at 6:28 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Hate to tell you guys this but putting her on the ticket has electrified the Republicans and church folk here. I mean, they are stoked.

They were going to delude themselves into being stoked if he'd have picked a tumbleweed. That's the GOP base- they fall into line when told.

1) There is not going to be a "bait and switch". There is no secret Old White Guy they're going to roll out a few weeks before the election. It's an insane idea, and would make them look like idiots. Palin really is the VP candidate. Really.


They did it with Harriet Meyers: Pick a politically correct but ineffectual nightmare, the media reacts, install angry right wing white guy.
posted by gjc at 6:31 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Yay average America! I want an "average" American to pilot my 747. And to operate on my moms brain tumor.
posted by tkchrist at 6:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


Progressives do need to stay on message, but if that message is "stop being a fucking moron!" it will do absolutely no good. Stop looking at these people as idiots and understand that their worldviews were shaped by certain conditions that need to be changed. Education is incredibly important, as are a number of socioeconomic issues that end up pumping out "morons." If you want to build a coalition to improve these things, you cannot consider your potential partners as idiots. It is divisive thinking that only exacerbates the problem and plays into the stupid culture war idea.

Maybe I'm wrong and people will only become more ignorant, but I think the first step to solving these problems is to consider this "stupidity" as a different point of view, understanding how that point of view came about, and then mobilizing to change what affects that point of view. I don't see how calling someone a moron helps at all.
posted by palidor at 6:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


I just realized we're a thousand comments into a political thread in a heated election year and I'm trying to be reasonable and positive. I think I just failed at the Internet.
posted by palidor at 6:41 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


What'd I miss?
posted by Smedleyman at 6:42 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


EarBucket writes "That [Presidential or Vice-presidential candidate] has to have a line of argument to offer on any conceivable issue. Quick, without pausing in the next ninety seconds, tell me what you think about: the balance of relations between Taiwan and mainland China, and exactly what signals we're sending to Hamas, and what we think about Russia's role in the G-8 and potentially in NATO, and where North Korea stands on its nuclear pledges -- plus Iran while we're at it, plus the EU after the Irish vote, plus cap-and-trade as applied to India and China, and what's the right future for South Ossetia;"

My friends, in all seriousness, for five and a half years I starved in a box in the Hanoi Hilton, a prisoner of the Vietnamese Communists.
posted by orthogonality at 6:46 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Well, I think this thread is depressing proof that the Republicans are already successful at their strategy of shifting the narrative from Iraq and the economy, to religion and its related wedge issues.
posted by naju at 6:48 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


And [God] help us all.
posted by naju at 6:49 PM on August 30, 2008


I'm starting to think that the people who pushed Palin on McCain don't actually care if he wins or not. Palin is the perfect GOP figurehead. She's religious, but not economically populist at all. Of course Alaska is practically a socialist state like Iceland or Norway, with Oil revenues being distributed to their (tiny) population. There isn't the same kind of intractable poverty problems you see in the rest of the country.

But anyway, Palin loves Jesus, and she loves Big Oil. By making her the VP for the republican party, they're cementing her place near the top. They're hoping to steer the republican "brand" in a new direction, vastly different from Bush and Cheney. She's still young and she could be around for a while.

Anyway.

No, what I AM saying is that she and her husband WERE the average American. She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower. She was no child of privilege born with the proverbial silver spoon. One thing this woman will never do is talk down to America.

Okay, I'll take the easy hit on this as well. Look, Most people on Metafilter are "intellectual elitists", so I don't think that's a winning argument here. Look at all the crap in this thread about how dumb the average American is. Now I don't personally belive that, as I said above, I think most Americans are pretty smart, but there are lots of below average Americans who are too stupid to know what's going on, and are therefore easily manipulated by bullshit. So, as campaigns come to a close, candidates chase those idiots hard, giving the appearance that those people really define America. But most people are pretty smart and probably have a pretty good idea who they're voting for. Especially in this election.

Palin probably isn't dumb, and she's an ordinary middle class American. But that's not the point. I think it's important to have a middle class background like Obama, Palin, Biden, Clinton or Edwards, but born rich people can understand the struggles of the middle class too (but may not). Going to an elite school doesn't make you an elitist (although many people do end up that way)

But it is important that the country be run by genuinely exceptional people. George W. Bush never tried to pretend he wasn't a dumbass, and look what it got us.
posted by delmoi at 6:51 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


My friends, in all seriousness, for five and a half years I starved in a box in the Hanoi Hilton, a prisoner of the Vietnamese Communists.

Well played, sir.
posted by EarBucket at 6:52 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


And Smedleyman! Welcome back!
posted by EarBucket at 6:53 PM on August 30, 2008


I think I just failed at the Internet.
Your problem is that you think you can help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion by focusing comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand—not at other members of the site. You gotta make fun of folks belief in a god, disrespect their convictions and tell them, repeatedly, to fuck off. It will probably help if you muse that Obama might really be a Muslim or that Sarah is covering for her daughters bastard child.
Whatever you do, keep your mind closed and dig in for your side!
Never mind that most people will be voting for either a woman or a black this fall. What's more important is rhetoric.
Create hatred, fear and consider becoming a suicide bomber.
Win at the internet by being a blowhard!
posted by dawson at 6:53 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


re: post-partisanship (and abortion ;) i liked kaine's formulation:
here's the distinction between Senator Obama and Senator McCain. Senator Obama believes abortion is a grave moral issue, that we can do things to reduce unwanted pregnancy and abortion but that we shouldn't criminalize the health care decisions of doctors and women to fight abortion.

Senator McCain, on the other hand, says he wants Roe vs. Wade to be overturned and that will be a step toward criminalizing the decisions of women and doctors with respect to abortion. We can reduce abortion and unwanted pregnancy in this country. We've shown it during the Clinton years. We can do it by--without making women and doctors criminals if they engage in abortion, in that procedure. And we shouldn't use the criminal laws of one instrument against women and doctors in this way. We can reduce abortion through access to education, access to contraception, abstinence-focused education, all those things can help us reduce abortion.

MR. GREGORY: When do you believe...

GOV. KAINE: But the criminal, the criminal law is not the way we should do it.

MR. GREGORY: When do you believe human rights begin?

GOV. KAINE: Well, human, human rights, broadly, my church teaches and I do believe that human rights begin early in life, at conception or shortly thereafter, and that is my personal belief. But I do not believe the force of the criminal law should compel others to necessarily follow that to the greatest degree. And that's why the strategy of Senator Obama is reduce abortion through education, health care access, point out the grave issue, support reasonable, common-sense restrictions on abortion, I think that's important. But you shouldn't be talking about overturning Roe vs. Wade or criminalizing women and their doctors.
cf. cheers!
posted by kliuless at 6:57 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


What'd I miss?

Michael Palin turned down an offer from John McCain to be his running mate. Palin realized he wasn't suited for the job -- as comedic an offer as it was. He suggested that McCain offer it to his distant cousin, Sarah -- someone he had only met once when hosting a fund-raising 'Monty Pyhton' retrospective on the PBS station in Idaho. She was working the phone bank, as one of the ever-eager college students attending the Univeristy of Idaho.

As it turns out, McCain also had only met her in person one time before. He was struck by the synchronicity and realized that such qualified her for his selection as a candidate for V.P. of the U.S. of A. (and a heart-beat away from becoming Commander-in-Chief). Not a "Roll-of-The-Dice" ... but, an appeal to a Higher Power (In the Christian God We All Should Trust -- or Forever Damn You To Hell, Especially Those Who Abort, The Fags and The Adulterers -- oh, err, wait, what?) led him in his decision.
posted by ericb at 6:58 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


"And, my friends, while I was in that prisoner of war camp for five and a half years ,my running mate, Governor SarahPalin, was working on her father's fishing trawler.

"I should say this, that Sarah didn't have a fancy metal speedboat. But she did sail a respectable Republican cloth boat, and I always tell her she'd look good in anything.

"One other thing I probably should tell you, because if I don't they'll probably be saying this about me, too. A man down in Texas, a man named Karl, heard a mention on the radio mention that I didn't have a running mate. And believe it or not, the day before we left on this campaign trip we got a message from the Republican National Committee in Dayton, saying they had a package for us. We went down to get it. You know what it was? It was a little beauty pageant winner in a crate that he'd sent all the way from Alaska, black and white, with glasses. And our little girl Tricia, the six year old, named it "Sarah Palin Checkers." And you know, the Republican base, like all kids, love my running mate, and I just want to say this, right now, that regardless of what anyone says about it, we're gonna keep it."
posted by orthogonality at 7:03 PM on August 30, 2008 [11 favorites]


Surprisingly rancorous.
posted by Mister_A at 7:11 PM on August 30, 2008


[a few comments removed - take fuck off talk to metatalk or email, do not do that here, thanks.]
posted by jessamyn at 7:12 PM on August 30, 2008


ericb, what about Obama, who,for one instance, called his community organizers 'God's army'? That's the same god konolia worships. why are you making personal attacks?
you are out of line. you also appear desperate and the bigger asshole here.
posted by dawson at 7:13 PM on August 30, 2008


The much-smarter powers behind the party selected Palin for a purpose. "Longshot chance at winning" was certainly not the reason for selecting her. What you should be doing is trying to figure out what that goal is.

Sarah Palin was selected for one reason and one reason only. She's a dog whistle to the evangelical Republican voter base. This very public woman chose to raise rather than abort a child with Down's. Christian fundamentalists across America are writhing in ecstasy at her nomination. Disenfranchised Republicans unhappy because McCain is too liberal for their tastes will come out in droves to see this women seated in the White House.

Her experience is irrelevant. Her looks are irrelevant. Her intellect is irrelevant. She made the long list, fell off the short list, and then miraculously made the grade four months after giving birth to a baby with Down's. I seriously doubt we'd be seeing her on that podium were this not the case.

I am not, by the way, dissing her actual qualifications. She could be highly experienced, stunningly beautiful, outrageously smart and able to find Iraq on a map and all of that would still be irrelevant to the RNC.
posted by DarlingBri at 7:13 PM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


A lot of us pray for the mercy of God to be poured out on this country because we know just how much we deserve judgement.

...and then we go into the ballot box, and we vote to keep the hungry unfed, and we vote to keep the unclothed naked, and we vote to keep those sick and in prison unvisited, and we vote to keep strangers unwelcome, and we vote for neverending war.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 7:16 PM on August 30, 2008 [56 favorites]


If a hurricane hitting New Orleans as the Republican convention starts does not qualify, among believers, as a sign from god, I feel to see what would.
posted by troybob at 7:19 PM on August 30, 2008 [6 favorites]


For some of us who view abortion as the holocaust it is, it is very much an issue. A lot of us pray for the mercy of God to be poured out on this country because we know just how much we deserve judgement.

But, your God does not represent evryone's god.

Let's keep religion out of the public square, as our Founding Fathers sought a separation between church and state.
posted by ericb at 7:24 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


you are out of line. you also appear desperate and the bigger asshole here.

Huh?
posted by ericb at 7:29 PM on August 30, 2008


In fact, as Palin's cultural views become better known -- she oppose (sic) abortion in all cases and opposes the use of birth control pills and condoms even among married couples -- she will undoubtedly scare the hell out of the soccer moms and 98% of Hillary voters.
-- from "Worst Pick Ever?" by pollster Del Ali, the president of Research 2000.
posted by orthogonality at 7:32 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


What'd I miss?

Well, Mitt and Tim are mad at John for leading them on and choosing Sarah to be his partner instead, and Cindy is a little worried that John might have a thing for Sarah so Cindy has her father convince John to enter a race to sail around the world and when he does, he ends up trapped on this island where he can't get off because of an ever-present, spacetime-distorting hurricane.

Meanwhile in Denver, Hillary has finally found the cartharsis she'd been searching for but it was still pretty clear to Barry that Bill had some lingering tensions that would need to be stroked if Bill was going to feel any relief, and Barry realized that the best person for the job would be Bill himself. Despite scattered reports of large mountain cats in the area, Bill managed to pull it off. And it all seems pretty much resolved after Barry wins the Super Bowl and the greek chorus sings Brooks and Dunn's Only in America as the screen fades to black.

But before the credits roll on this episode we hear Sarah's name whispered by a gruff voice in the dark. Then we see Sarah stepping up to a mirror in a barely lit room. She's sees the specter of Dick in the reflection.

"Do not fear, Sarah. You will be instructed well in the dark ways of the vice presidency."

Pretty compelling stuff.
posted by effwerd at 7:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [13 favorites]


If a hurricane hitting New Orleans as the Republican convention starts does not qualify, among believers, as a sign from god, I feel to see what would.

McCain, Palin campaign with one eye on hurricane.
posted by ericb at 7:34 PM on August 30, 2008


The information that her daughter Bristol is the actual mother of Trig, the "fifth child" of Palin is getting some legs.

I really don't like this story. It, like the fact that she was once in a beauty pagent, has nothing to do with her policies. It's a mean, much-raking rumour.

---------------------------

She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower.

I would like to point out that no university anywhere has ivory towers. If you are lucky, maybe you have a brick tower, maybe with some stone cladding for the fancy places. But the vast majority are made of concrete.

Seriously, I find the whole academic=elite meme really offensive. Say what you like about academics - that they are quarellsome and argumentative, the sucessful ones can be at times arrogant, that they are so independant minded they can have trouble working together -- but one thing they are not (as a group) is socially elitist. I mean you are talking about some really smart people who could have worked a lot of really renumerative jobs who instead have, out of love for what they study, have a much lower income than many of the people they went to university with. Many lived in real poverty as graduate students; even those with better funding live for years on with a low wage, unable to save or buy a house. (You want to talk elitist? To me "elite" means being able to go out for dinner, being able to have more than two rooms for you and your husband to live in. To be saving for retirement before you turn thirty, to be able to even think about buying a house or having kids sometime before you turn forty.)

More than that - a hell of of a lot of those academics know exactly what is happening with "ordinary" Americans (or Canadians or Brits, or Africans or Chinese people) because they study them for a living. All of the sociologists, economists, historians, anthropologists - they deal with real people (albeit sometimes dead) everyday, and they pay constant attention to what is happening in our world because they care. And academics in all disciplines come from all classes, races, and countries - - there is more diversity of experience in any given univerisity than just about anywhere in the world, and they talk to each other, so that they don't just have a sense of what life is like for most Americans, but also know a bit about the rest of the world too.

Or do you think they are "elitist" because they value knowledge above money? That sounds really elitist.

----------------------------

Up thread, I said that I felt like many Americans who claim that they want to vote for the candidate who will give them the biggest tax cut but who vote for McCain would be voting like idiots -- not that they were idiots. I don't believe that they are. But I do believe that they have been willfully ignorant, that they have abrogated their responsibilities to themselves, to their children and to their fellow citizens to pay attention to the civic process, and to at least learn the basic facts of the two platforms. It's not like the tax proposals have not been easily digested for them.

People like to talk about personal responsibility -- well, I think this is just about one of the most important personal responsibilities you have: learn before you vote. Find out what the proposals are, and what they mean. Don't vote with your gut; guts are for picking take-out. Most of us claim that we want democracy -- people to rule themselves -- so then we have a bit of work to do.

Not that I let the media off the hook either. Frankly, the American media should simply be sickened at what it has become. In 2004, over and over again the media questioned whether Kerry would "would do as good a job in the War on Terror as Bush has done", at the same time as the world's military and strategic communities were tearing their hair out at what a terrible mess Bush et al had made of it all. But the Hollywood story - Republicans are strong and pro-military (despite being strategically incompentant and eviserating verterans' support services) - was more important than, you know, reality. The media has abrogated its own responsibilities to put the truth and informing the public discourse first.
posted by jb at 7:50 PM on August 30, 2008 [49 favorites]


Just for the record, there is an abundance of religious language in the Declaration of Independence, and prayer has long been a part of the rituals in the Houses of Congress.

This is the entire constitutional basis of the concept of the separation of church and state:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The long-standing separation of church and state is the result of judicial interpretation of the first amendment, and not iron-clad constitutional language. It is crucial to remember this fact, because there are many literalists in the US–biblical literalists and constitutional literalists. It is not uncommon for these two literalist traits to sort together in one person. Literalists view neither the Bible nor the US Constitution as living, breathing documents, but rather as immutable commandments engraved on stone tablets handed down from on high.

Rigid belief systems like this offer psychic comfort to billions of people across the world who are terrified of punishment–punishment by God, by the Law, by their parents, by their bosses. Belief in a simple, clearly defined, immutable set of rules allays the fears of punishment among the masses, but it does not immunize them from depradation by the powerful; instead, it guarantees that these people will accede to the horrors visited upon them by those who hold power. When people prostrate themselves to rigid belief systems, they submit to and empower the cruel whims of the arbiters of those systems.

There is a large block of voters in the US whose belief system holds that abortion is a mortal sin, no matter the context. The Republican party has discovered that it can attach nearly any depraved rider to this bill, and it will pass unanimously in the congress of the religious right. The cynical manipulation of the fearful by so-called Christians in government and in the various hard-line ministries is deplorable and un-Christian, but also shockingly predictable. You must understand that the people you dismiss as stupid are only stupid because they are blinded by fear–they literally fear the fires of hell if they vote for Obama, because their radicalized churches tell them that voting for someone who supports Roe v Wade will indeed condemn them to the lake of fire. While they may understand that the policies of the government that they helped to create often hurt them economically, they do not believe they are voting against their own interests in the long term, because the long term is eternity.

posted by Mister_A at 8:00 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


No, what I AM saying is that she and her husband WERE the average American. She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower. She was no child of privilege born with the proverbial silver spoon.

Are you talking about Obama here? Seriously? McCain was the son and grandson of US Navy Admirals, people who walked the halls of power within the US government... that's a lot closer to silver spoon territory than anything in Obama's personal history prior to law school.

And I'm sorry for the tone... but please spare me the "ivory tower elitist" talk. Here's a fact you may not realize about college professors:

At one time, most of them were broke-ass graduate students, often living below the poverty level for years at a time.

My partner, one of my brothers and a few of my friends are pursuing PhDs right now, and not a one of them has two nickels to rub together. One would think that people who overcome financial adversity and go on to get good jobs would be celebrated by those who drive the Republican narrative... except wait, they don't agree with Republicans because they've actually been poor and know what the fuck it's like, so screw 'em.

(And to be honest, most of the "ivory tower academics" who seem to have any noticable effect on American political discourse are... wait for it... Republicans. People like Wolfowitz [PhD in poli sci from the University of Chicago], and Condi Rice [PhD in poli sci from the University of Denver, Stanford faculty member and provost], and countless intellectuals working in the rarefied environment of the conservative think tanks, where they don't have to form unions and deal with budget cuts like those professors. The only liberal academic [besides Obama, and he was never a full-time university professor like, say, Secretary Rice] I can think of offhand who has had any sort of effect on contemporary, popular political discourse is maaaybe George Lakoff. Maybe.)

I'm sorry, but when I hear someone talk about elitist academics who don't realize the hardships those people have faced to get a decent job, I know I'm not dealing with a serious person.
posted by the_bone at 8:09 PM on August 30, 2008 [31 favorites]


On preview: kind of what jb said, just angrier.
posted by the_bone at 8:11 PM on August 30, 2008


Crap, I forgot why I even came into this thread:

45+ Problems for McCain's Veep in Just 35 Hours

John McCain Is Ruining Sarah Palin's Life
posted by the_bone at 8:26 PM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


jb writes "Seriously, I find the whole academic=elite meme really offensive."

"Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded."
posted by orthogonality at 8:33 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


othogonality, I wonder if your pollster has a source for the claim he/she makes in your quote?

If this is true, Palin will indeed "scare the hell out of the soccer moms," not to mention a good number of a partially overlapping demographic, conservative prolifers.

That's an extreme enough view that I have to be skeptical. Has Palin really come out and said that?
posted by torticat at 8:36 PM on August 30, 2008


Remember also that the other work she has done-such as the commercial fishing-gives her a real perspective on what is important to the average American. That is a perspective that a lot of people inside the Beltway truly lack.

Let's not forget that Obama worked at a Baskin Robbins.
posted by birdherder at 8:43 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


torticat writes "othogonality, I wonder if your pollster has a source for the claim he/she makes in your quote?"

Honestly, that was the first I've seen it, and I have no further cite.
posted by orthogonality at 8:49 PM on August 30, 2008


Well, she's a member of Feminists for Life, which, from what I understand, ARE for birth control. So I doubt she doesn't believe in any birth control.
posted by agregoli at 8:49 PM on August 30, 2008


Let me spell it out....she and her husband have been blue collar workers. She will understand the blue collar subculture. And blue collar people will relate to her.
posted by konolia at 8:51 PM on August 30, 2008


jb: Seriously, I find the whole academic=elite meme really offensive. Say what you like about academics - that they are quarellsome and argumentative, the sucessful ones can be at times arrogant, that they are so independant minded they can have trouble working together -- but one thing they are not (as a group) is socially elitist.

I think this is extremely dependent on locality; here in Boston, for example, there is an unambiguous, historic subtext of tension and class-envy between the academic and working worlds. People who go to MIT and Harvard are generally not from, and certainly not destined for, the average economic stratum of the surrounding population, nor do they resemble it demographically.
posted by kid ichorous at 8:52 PM on August 30, 2008


but there are lots of below average Americans who are too stupid to know what's going on, and are therefore easily manipulated by bullshit.

And lots of them are also left-wingers. Trust me- the right doesn't have a monopoly on uninformed idiots.

And jb, academics may be broke, but they're better than Those Guys Who Work In Factories. In Berkeley I've never run into that attitude, though I've never been to school here, either, but IU Bloomington's liberal arts grad school was rotten with it. The classism there was truly shocking. (And lots and lots of students in these schools were from long lines of academics- and felt pretty superior about it. I guess they'd HAVE to be snobby about it. How else could you justify being low-income for generations PLUS generally unable to function outside academia? I will never forget my department head's quote: "Get one of those knuckle-draggers up here to help me set up my voicemail." Disgusting. And pathetic.)
posted by small_ruminant at 8:52 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


...or I could just look around a bit myself.

See here. ("she is pro-contraception," etc.)

Still no direct quotes, so take it fwiw.
posted by torticat at 8:53 PM on August 30, 2008


Sarah Palin scrubs her own Wikipedia entry?
posted by effwerd at 8:59 PM on August 30, 2008


"Get one of those knuckle-draggers up here to help me set up my voicemail."

Clearly wasn't the head of either the anthropology or the computer science departments.
posted by kid ichorous at 9:01 PM on August 30, 2008


Her very existence on the ticket is an god damned insult. It's basically a cynical admission that the base constituency of the Republican party are complete idiots.

Well, I think the Democratic Party picking Obama over Hillary already proved that solid experience is not always what a party is looking for in a candidate. Hillary at least was married to a chief executive. And neither Obama or McCain has ever held an executive position.

Perhaps we need to have a rule that only former governors can run for President, if we really want to do more than give lip service to the idea we have "qualified " candidates.
posted by konolia at 9:01 PM on August 30, 2008


Palin becomes President, screws things up worse, lesson learned: don't let women have power.

And y'know, I suspect that would be fine with the Republican party.

And, hey, come back in 2012 with a manly-man who will "put things right." Yet another four years of power.
posted by five fresh fish at 9:22 PM on August 30, 2008


...and then we go into the ballot box, and we vote to keep the hungry unfed, and we vote to keep the unclothed naked, and we vote to keep those sick and in prison unvisited, and we vote to keep strangers unwelcome, and we vote for neverending war.

how many meals you serve to the homeless this week? how much unused clothing in your closets? how many sickbeds and prison cells you see this week? voting doesn't impact any of that shit, YOU do.
posted by quonsar at 9:24 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]



Well, she's a member of Feminists for Life, which, from what I understand, ARE for birth control. So I doubt she doesn't believe in any birth control.

Actually, FFL sorta darts around contraception.
Feminists for Life's mission is to address the unmet needs of women who are pregnant or parenting. Preconception issues including abstinence and contraception are outside of our mission. Some FFL members and supporters support the use of non-abortifacient contraception while others oppose contraception for a variety of reasons. FFL is concerned that certain forms of contraception have had adverse health effects on women.

Our membership enjoys a broad spectrum of opinion that reflects the diversity of opinions among the American public.
This article indicates FFL like most other pro-life groups is against contraception
Today, pro-life groups in the U.S. are reclassifying the most common contraception methods, including the birth control pill, the patch, the IUD and the depo-shot, as “abortifacients,” claiming, with no scientific backing, that they cause abortions. On their website, Feminists for Life classifies emergency contraception as an abortion method. If this were true, Feminists for Life should also classify 40 percent of all birth control methods as abortion methods because they all have the same mode of action as emergency contraception.
Now Gov. Palin may be "pro-contraception" as she indicated in the interview torticat linked to, but that doesn't mean it is policy of FFL. This post on DailyKOS has some interesting notes on FFL's position or non-position on birth control.
posted by birdherder at 9:25 PM on August 30, 2008


she and her husband have been blue collar workers. She will understand the blue collar subculture. And blue collar people will relate to her.

Wow, great. That puts her in an excellent position to advocate on behalf of this "subculture" in an advisory capacity to those who are making decisions. It doesn't qualify her for the big job itself.

If a decision process was being made in the design of a new automobile, I could possibly add a few suggestions. I've driven a car all my life. I don't think that would qualify me to become the president (or vice president) of Toyota.

Well, I think the Democratic Party picking Obama over Hillary already proved that solid experience is not always what a party is looking for in a candidate.

McCain based his whole campaign on chiding Obama's lack of experience.

And neither Obama or McCain has ever held an executive position.

Here's the new buzzword straight from the new talking point boilerplate.
"Executive Experience" = Governor of the least densely populated state for 16 months?
posted by damo at 9:28 PM on August 30, 2008


Hillary at least was married to a chief executive.

Chris Rock had a good bit about this: “I’ve been with my wife for 10 years now,” he said. “If she got onstage right now, y’all wouldn’t laugh at all.”

66 days before the election, out comes somebody with basically no experience that is a heartbeat away from the presidency, and you want to compare that to someone who has been getting scrutinized, attacked, responded, traveled across the country giving talks big and small, having every single word dissected since Spring 2007?? Obama has been investigated, raked over the coals, produced his tax records, had people questioning everything about him.

Not. Obama IS American. He is a great American. If I had a kid I would want him to grow up and make the most of his mind and his body and his opportunities. For you to imply that Obama is somehow less American? What's that about? That's lame.
posted by cashman at 9:29 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


interesting, the dismissive tone and scoffing of some here vs Camille Paglia's take:
"We may be seeing the first woman president. As a Democrat, I am reeling. That was the best political speech I have ever seen delivered by an American woman politician. Palin is as tough as nails."
Sure wouldn't guess even things were 10% of that by the cocky, sneering comments here!
posted by dawson at 9:29 PM on August 30, 2008


So apparently this most recent scandal isn't the first time Palin's been in trouble for possibly abusing the power of her office to fire someone.

Some citizens of Wasilia were considering pushing for a recall of her.

I don't have much to say to the general thrust(s) of the thread beyond the fact that I think if she makes it that long, this will be the most hilarious VP debate ever (or at least in my lifetime).

This feels seriously like a Harriet Miers moment to me.
posted by sparkletone at 9:35 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Let me spell it out....she and her husband have been blue collar workers. She will understand the blue collar subculture. And blue collar people will relate to her.

What, do you think academics can only come out of white-collar families? My dad started working outdoors on a farm in Switzerland when he was age 5, and never stopped... he's currently a construction foreman in his early sixties who still does physical labor for nine hours a day. He drinks a six-pack a day, cusses up a storm, works like an ox, throws darts and goes camping for two weeks at a time, and became an American citizen a couple of years ago partly so he could vote against Republicans. My mom, whom I lived with when my parents split, had serious health problems and was on AFDC when I was living with her. My partner's parents grew up in poverty overseas (and incidentally are super-evangelical Christians who are nevertheless extremely liberal/leftist on economic issues... because they grew up outside of the US, and, again, were actually incredibly poor). I went to a major conservatory on my own dime, my brother is getting a PhD in literature on his own dime (save for the fact that he lives with our dad because, again, grad students are some of the broke-est motherfuckers around), my partner left an $80K/year programming gig to do a PhD in comp lit on her own dime and is at the end of her rope financially right now while she finishes her dissertation. So, how could you imply that people like myself, and my brother, and kaiserin can't relate to blue-collar worries? How dare you imply that? The final, galling irony here is that you're using this implication to slam Obama, who came from inauspicious beginnings, and who actually spent a chunk of time working with/for poor people before going on to law school.

Oh, wait. I'm sorry. Your line I quoted above wasn't about reality, it was about politics. She'll "understand" the blue-collar subculture, whatever the fuck that is, so that the Republicans can exploit it. Blue-collar people will "relate" to her, and thus vote against their best interests. It's telling that there was nothing in your comment implying that she might actually help these blue-collar people. As someone who grew up working class, I'll tell you that any blue-collar worker I know (who spends less than two hours a week in church, which is not to say that these folks aren't religious) knows that, rhetoric aside, the Republican Party is not, and never will be, the friend of the working man.
posted by the_bone at 9:39 PM on August 30, 2008 [23 favorites]


and working woman. [NOT SEXIST]
posted by the_bone at 9:45 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


Perhaps we need to have a rule that only former governors can run for President, if we really want to do more than give lip service to the idea we have "qualified " candidates.

See: the last eight years.
posted by neroli at 9:47 PM on August 30, 2008


Perhaps we need to have a rule that only former governors can run for President, if we really want to do more than give lip service to the idea we have "qualified " candidates.

Or perhaps that is an absolutely ridiculous idea, and some people would do well to just stick with the party line of "executive experience blah blah blah" instead of trying to expound on it.

I mean, there have been some pretty darn good US Presidents among the 63% of them who never served as a governor before becoming president.
posted by Balonious Assault at 9:48 PM on August 30, 2008


When it comes time to pull that lever, there will be blue collar workers who will feel they have a lot more in common with Palin than Obama/Biden. Just sayin'.


When it comes right down to it, for many people voting is an emotional act. Obama is a master at producing those emotions, and convincing people he can actually do all those things he has promised. When I read his speech (then later watched it) all I could think of is, heck, all you gotta do is get up there and say you will do this, say you will do that, and the sheeple will swoon, and the fireworks will go off, and the music will soar, and the photogenic candidate and his photogenic wife and their adorable photogenic kids will be standing their looking totally like what a presidential family should look like.

Smoke and mirrors.


So mock Palin if you must. But if you think Obama/Biden is substantially better, it is only because you have neglected to look behind the curtain.
posted by konolia at 9:49 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


Smoke and mirrors.

Worked for Bush.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 9:52 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


Just what makes a "qualified" candidate?

Both Roosevelt's did not serve full terms as governor of New York, before FDR became president and Teddy became VP (Pres after McKinley's assasination) - both were great Presidents.

LBJ was succesful at getting what he wanted through congress, as he was an astute master of the senate.

What I think has been overlooked is the unbelievable rise of Barack Obama and what it says about him and his skills. As a life long Chicagoan I am amazed at what he has accomplished as an outsider. I live in the hot bed of nepotism. Not just the Daleys, but the former President of the Cook County board, John Stroger left his job to his son, Tod Stroger (in a county with a population of 5.3 million, an incredible tax base and helm of a patronage army), The president of the State Senate Emil Jones just gave his job to Emil junior

The head of the Illinois House of Representatives' daughter is Attorney General and expected to be the next governor. I often feel I live in the crookedest place in the world, and we locals have grown entirely too immune to it.

Well into this bastion comes an out of towner, Mr Obama, unconnected but with high hopes. And 15 years later he is the Democratic nominee for President. This is where Jesse Jackson thought his son Jesse Junior might be.

He did it with his obvious great personal charisma, incredible intellectual gifts and a sense of humor. But what I hear people praise him for is his ability to build a consensus. He has the ability to speak clearly and adroitly, letting people rise to their better natures.

He has been able to come out of Illinois politics without any hint of personal corrption (no mean feat) and generally well liked by even his opponents. And he seems to genuinely like the job he's doing.

This, I think, makes for a qualified candidate.

He understands what needs to be done to make our country great, he is a lover and scholar of the constitution, and he is a natural leader of people. I hope he proves to be one of our greatest presidents. I only wish McCain hadn't pulled this bone headed pick just to steal Obama's thunder from the most immpressive political speech I have ever witnessed.

And I will not be suprised if this is a "Harriet Myers" place holder deal. This is just too weird, in many respects.
posted by readery at 9:57 PM on August 30, 2008 [20 favorites]


Perhaps we need to have a rule that only former governors can run for President, if we really want to do more than give lip service to the idea we have "qualified " candidates.

See, konolia, we don't have such a rule, which means that me or thee are free to use any qualification standndard we want in supporting or criticizing a candidate. But the point at hand is at hand because the McCain campaign has made it a central campaign issue for the last umpty months. Picking Palin is as much as an admission "Oh, whoops, we didn't mean any of that shit. Our bad!"

I think you have it backwards. When they married, McCain was the trophy husband.

Exactly. The GOP spent $millions portraying Kerry as the trophy husband in HIS marriage. It was intended to make him look dependent and emasculate him.

Sarah Palin scrubs her own Wikipedia entry?

That's nuts. One of the first edits the user made was to redirect his user page to his user talk page. That's the mark of a pretty experienced editor. As to the timing, it could have been mere prescience.
posted by dhartung at 10:06 PM on August 30, 2008


"But- but McCain is a Republican! Surely there must be some higher, mysterious, secret power at work that we're just not seeing." No, sometimes a bad move is just a bad move.

I think the best way to look at it comes from a line by Hal Holbrook/Deep Throat in All The President's Men: "The truth is these are not very bright guys, and things got a little out of hand."

Before accepting a conspiratorial explanation for anything, always consider the possibility that it's all just some average guys who let things get out of hand.
posted by jonp72 at 10:06 PM on August 30, 2008


Actually, the more I think about it.

If it's not a "Harriet Miers" moment, it's totally a Thomas Eagleton moment.

I think I spelled that right. It's been a long time since I read Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72.
posted by sparkletone at 10:08 PM on August 30, 2008


Yeah, and I am a working class kid still living in the same neighborhood as ever, trying to make ends meet, just like my neighbors.

Sarah Palin's family income has consistently been six figures in an oil rich state. They own three homes and probably a fleet of snowmobiles. I don't think she speaks for me.
posted by readery at 10:08 PM on August 30, 2008 [2 favorites]


who will feel they have a lot more in common with Palin than Obama/Biden. Just sayin'.

Indeed.
posted by homunculus at 10:16 PM on August 30, 2008


the_bone: the Republican Party is not, and never will be, the friend of the working man.

This year's Republican National Convention is designed to showcase their scorn for the working man/woman: they're opening their convention on Labor Day (which was once a holiday to honor Labor...).
posted by AsYouKnow Bob at 10:17 PM on August 30, 2008 [1 favorite]


When it comes time to pull that lever, there will be blue collar workers who will feel they have a lot more in common with Obama than McMansion/Palin. Just sayin'.

When it comes right down to it, for many people voting is an emotional act. McCain is a master at producing those emotions by saying he's a P.O.W., or by trying to scare them with talk about surrendering, or by misrepresenting his opponents positions. When I read his srecord all I could think of is, heck, all you gotta do is put a woman up there, and you don't say out loud you will vote against women's rights as most see them, and the sheeple will cower in fear, and the "she's a woman!" fireworks will go off, and the harley engines will roar, and the American candidate and his "She IS American" running mate and their war-related stories will be standing there looking totally like what all the other presidents have looked like.

Fear and trickery.


So mock Obama if you must. But if you think McCain/Palin is substantially better, it is only because you have neglected to look past the fear, at the record.
posted by cashman at 10:21 PM on August 30, 2008 [9 favorites]


She is no elitist looking down from an intellectual ivory tower.

You hateful bigot.
posted by dirigibleman at 10:53 PM on August 30, 2008 [3 favorites]


You hateful bigot.

huh?
posted by small_ruminant at 10:56 PM on August 30, 2008


The only liberal academic [besides Obama, and he was never a full-time university professor like, say, Secretary Rice] I can think of offhand who has had any sort of effect on contemporary, popular political discourse is maaaybe George Lakoff. Maybe

Bill and Hillary have both been law professors. In fact, the judge in the Monica Lewinski mess actually had Bill as one of her professors.
but there are lots of below average Americans who are too stupid to know what's going on, and are therefore easily manipulated by bullshit.
And lots of them are also left-wingers. Trust me- the right doesn't have a monopoly on uninformed idiots.


I never said they were, I but I was talking about swing voters specifically. A lot of the political advertising you see wouldn't work on most people, who actually are paying attention and read or watch the news and know what's going on. They've mostly made up their minds -- based on whatever criteria is important to them.

When it comes time to pull that lever, there will be blue collar workers who will feel they have a lot more in common with Palin than Obama/Biden. Just sayin'.

Well, I don't know who they'll feel like they'll have more in common with, but most of them will vote for the democratic ticket, as they have in the last few presidential elections. It's just a fact that lower middle class and working class people are more likely to vote Democratic. It's towards the upper end of the middle class where you find most of the republican voters. Higher then that, and the population is too small to make much of a difference.

Also, it's kind of weird to suggest that they won't feel comfortable with Biden, who seems to be well loved by working class people. And wouldn't they be more worried about the actual top of the ticket and John "how many houses" McCain? The guy spends $270,000 on personal staff like butlers and maids.
posted by delmoi at 11:00 PM on August 30, 2008


People who go to MIT and Harvard are generally not from, and certainly not destined for, the average economic stratum of the surrounding population, nor do they resemble it demographically.
posted by kid ichorous at 11:52 PM on August 30 [+] [!]


We can discuss access problems in higher education in another thread, but it's been my experience that post-graduate education even at elite universities is quite diverse in class origins. I'm speaking only anecdotally, as no one does stats on grad students, but a substantial number come from middle class and working class and poor backgrounds. Post-graduate programs draw from a diverse group of undergraduate universities, including many American state universities and international state universities which are themselves more accessible to lower income students. I know tenured academics (leaving students aside) whose fathers were farm labourers, miners, shop keepers, or factory workers, just as I know academics whose parents were other academics or professionals. Many academics are the first in their family to go to university.

I'm not saying that academics know all walks of life -- just that they are substantially less elite than just about anyone else with their level of education, and a lot less elite than the business or political leaders who love to paint them as being elite and out of touch. They do tend to be more well-read than the average citizen, but then again, that reading tends to be very specialised -- and they can be shockingly ignorant about somethings (like email -- see the above comment). But what I've seen of academics is that they are often more aware of economic realities of poor and working class people than most other middle class or higher people I've met - many because they have been there. I supose there is the rare perfectly well-funded academic whose degree didn't overrun, never took adjunct lecturing position or had to do a post-doc. But they are the crazy ones. Most are very familiar with pasta and chick peas on sale. (69 cents a can at Shaws right now - that was great).

And the vast majority of academics in North America work at non-elite universities, where they teach students who are themselves often the first in their families to go to university, and who have to work 20 hours a week to pay for tuition and/or live at home with all the distractions and family strife (esp due to economic problems) -- the teachers get all this back.
posted by jb at 11:08 PM on August 30, 2008


Why are you guys getting so pissy at Konolia because she's arguing that Palin appeals to the the Republican base? I mean, shit, I think we can all safely say that she's more familiar with that demographic than anybody else here. What are we getting out of yelling "No they don't! No they don't!"

If I were really interested in gathering voters, rather than dismissing her endorsement of Palin as balderdash, I would listen to why she (and others) like Palin and figure out how to change their like to dislike.

This pick is GREAT for courting the base, because Palin has conservative values and that same backwoodsy "Aw, shucks, me be the President? Well, I will if you guys want me to! Let's all have a beer!" schtick that Bush had and appeals to many, many voters.

Konolia, I'm sorry if you have already asked been asked this question and I missed it, this is a pretty huge thread. Are you comfortable with the amount of experience that Palin has had? Do you think she's qualified to be President if something were to happen to McCain? Were there any other potential VP candidates that you would have preferred? I ask this honestly, I know in a thread it's hard to not read everything as snark but I'd really like your perspective.
posted by schroedinger at 11:59 PM on August 30, 2008 [4 favorites]


DEMOCRATS TAKE WARNING: McCain just closed the evangelical vote
posted by homunculus at 12:00 AM on August 31, 2008


Palin's Buddy Pat Buchanan on Women
"More of the views that apparently attracted McCain's VP choice, Sarah Palin, to Pat Buchanan:
2007: 'The rise of women to power in a civilization is very often the mark of its decline.'

-- Pat Buchanan, On The McLaughlin Group, July 6, 2007

1983: 'Rail as they will against "discrimination," women are simply not endowed by nature with the same measures of single-minded ambition and the will to succeed in the fiercely competitive world of Western capitalism…The momma bird builds the nest. So it was, so it ever shall be. Ronald Reagan is not responsible for this; God is."'

-- Pat Buchanan, Washington Times. November 18, 1983"
posted by ericb at 12:16 AM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Palin Connects with a Key Place: Exurban America -- "Just-settled edges of U.S. cities could be central to the GOP ticket's success."
posted by ericb at 12:21 AM on August 31, 2008


Was the evangelical vote ever really up for grabs?
posted by kid ichorous at 12:24 AM on August 31, 2008


Was the evangelical vote ever really up for grabs?

Obama has repeatedly said he wants to reach out to religious voters, there are liberal evangelicals. But of course the hard-core konolia type we typically consider as the "evangelical voter" was feared by the GOP to be unexcited and thus unlikely to turn out. And not only that, but the evangelical base is also key to the republican GOTV (get out the vote) operations.
posted by delmoi at 12:34 AM on August 31, 2008


Why are you guys getting so pissy at Konolia because she's arguing that Palin appeals to the the Republican base?

We're all quite aware that the Republican VP candidate will attract Republican votes, as well as what schtick the McCain team will be using to make Palin more appealing. I think the issue is with what Konolia believes Obama is or isn't, as opposed to what Palin is or isn't. That's what seems to be getting the biggest reaction from people here anyway, if I'm reading this correctly.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:36 AM on August 31, 2008


konolia writes "Obama is a master at producing those emotions... all I could think of is, heck, all you gotta do is get up there and say you will do this, say you will do that, and the sheeple will swoon,"

Wait, a McCain supporter just said "sheeple"?

I mean, konolia's never even been to reddit.com, right? Much less been a 9/11 Truther.

You're hurting my head, konolia!
posted by orthogonality at 1:15 AM on August 31, 2008


This thread. Wow.
posted by cj_ at 2:21 AM on August 31, 2008


DEMOCRATS TAKE WARNING: McCain just closed the evangelical vote

From the link: And it doesn't help that some believe Obama to be Muslim and the Anti-Christ: The Man who will create a One-World Government and bring in the Apocalypse. 12% of Americans believe this thanks to the power of viral emails.

That's got to be bullshit.
posted by kisch mokusch at 2:23 AM on August 31, 2008


He's playing to the undecideds, here, but he risks losing his Republican base.

Unless you are really uncharismatic, fail to push party lines, or come across as a chump, you will never really lose your base. Strong Republicans not going to vote for Obama just because they don't like Palin! On the other hand, undecideds are absolutely who you want to go for, and a woman, at least, is a good choice for this. Other options for VP to show diversity -- a black or Latino male VP -- might have come across as "copying" Obama. Going for a woman makes it seem like they're fulfilling a dream.

I just hope this election doesn't become a taste of whether America is more racist, or more sexist.

Also, the solution to the OMG PUMA supporters voting for McCain thing is to use Hillary in targeted ads. Find the areas where McCain is ahead because of disgruntled PUMAs and put Hillary on every billboard saying, "If you support what I fought for, vote for Obama."
posted by Deathalicious at 3:59 AM on August 31, 2008


500 comments later, I have two thoughts on this sort of distasteful but deliciously trashy whose-daughter-is-it-anyway thing...

(1) They named one son "Track" because he was born during track season? The boy in question is named "Trig"? Has anyone looked into which classes high-schooler Bristol was taking in the semester before she vanished from school for six months? How large are these classes? How many... boys? Who's the (gulp) teacher?

(2) If Gov Palin did indeed cover up her daughter's pregnancy by claiming the child as her own, that isn't necessarily going to look bad to the very conservative, old-fashioned type of voter, is it? Forty or fifty years ago... that's just what one did, after all, and it was understood that it was not talked about.. Calling her out for it, in fact, would itself be the height of rudeness, like commenting on daddy's drinky drinky problem.
posted by rokusan at 4:04 AM on August 31, 2008


And it doesn't help that some believe Obama to be Muslim and the Anti-Christ: The Man who will create a One-World Government and bring in the Apocalypse.

Well... every time I hear the McCain camp call him "the One" or place some other faux-flattering biblical label on Obama, I hear dogs howl. They are most definitely pushing that button over and over again.
posted by rokusan at 4:05 AM on August 31, 2008


Calling her out for it, in fact, would itself be the height of rudeness, like commenting on daddy's drinky drinky problem.

I'm not so sure about that. The voters have a right to know, don't you think?
Perhaps the matter could be cleared up by calling several hundred thousand registered Republicans and ask them whether this is an issue for them: "If you knew that the father of Trig Palin is not Sarah's husband Todd Palin but actually a student from Wasilla High School, would you be more or less likely to vote for Sarah Palin?"
posted by sour cream at 5:05 AM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


6 things Palin pick says about 'maverick' McCain

• 1. He's desperate. Let's stop pretending this race is as close as national polling suggests. The truth is McCain is essentially tied or trailing in every swing state that matters - and too close for comfort in several states like Indiana and Montana the GOP usually wins pretty easily in presidential races. On top of that, voters seem very inclined to elect Democrats in general this election and seem very sick of the Bush years.

McCain could easily lose in an electoral landslide. That is the private view of Democrats and Republicans alike.

McCain's pick shows he is not pretending. Politicians, even "mavericks" like McCain, play it safe when they think they are winning - or see an easy path to winning. They roll the dice only when they know that the risks of conventionality are greater than the risks of boldness.


This is important to remember. I hope that the dem side can keep from coming apart at the seams over a move that was basically rooted in weakness... and most especially avoid further inflaming already raw feelings related to perceived and overt sexism, because whatever else McCain gains by naming her, she will also be bait for this sort of rotten behavior. VPILF wasn't a great beginning. It's also not promising that so many people are saying, "oh poo - now nobody can attack her on the issues because it will be seen as sexist/mean". Not true. Please do argue the issues, and not her reproductive system. Ask the hard questions, and stop worrying about how she's going to breastfeed as VP. Etc. She's a candidate for Vice President of the United States; crying that she can't be confronted on actual issues because she's a woman is just more stupid sexism, and that's not really helping anyone right now - especially the Democratic party.
posted by taz at 5:09 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


sour cream writes "'If you knew that the father of Trig Palin is not Sarah's husband Todd Palin but actually a student from Wasilla High School, would you be more or less likely to vote for Sarah Palin?'"

What, is Trig a illegitimate black baby?
posted by orthogonality at 5:17 AM on August 31, 2008


So mock Palin if you must. But if you think Obama/Biden is substantially better, it is only because you have neglected to look behind the curtain.

HiLARious.
posted by tristeza at 5:31 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Palin has more executive governmental experience than Obama and Biden combined.

By that measure, she has more than McCain as well.


Technically, Michael Scott from "The Office" has more executive experience than Obama, Biden, and McCain.

Scott/Schrute '08!
posted by EarBucket at 5:49 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Let me spell it out....she and her husband have been blue collar workers. She will understand the blue collar subculture. And blue collar people will relate to her.

i work at a factory as a blue collar worker and my blue collar co-workers have a phrase for those who would vote for mccain and palin - "you're working democratic but you're voting republican"

yeah, we "relate" to them - we relate to them as management, not as rank and file

and that's how things are in the world of blue-collar, pro-union, yankee NASCAR democrats
posted by pyramid termite at 5:51 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


More seriously, though, running a presidential campaign is a lot like running a large corporation. And the Obama campaign is the biggest, most well-organized campaign in history. He's been the head of a political machine that's been firing on all cylinders and has taken over the Democratic party from within, defeating Hillary, who had every advantage in the world. Whatever else you think about him, it's clear he's a hell of a manager.
posted by EarBucket at 5:51 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Konolia, I'm sorry if you have already asked been asked this question and I missed it, this is a pretty huge thread. Are you comfortable with the amount of experience that Palin has had? Do you think she's qualified to be President if something were to happen to McCain? Were there any other potential VP candidates that you would have preferred? I ask this honestly, I know in a thread it's hard to not read everything as snark but I'd really like your perspective.

First, I don't think McCain is about to kick the bucket any time soon. He can afford the finest of health care, for one thing. He is someone I trust with foreign policy and I also trust that he will see that his VP gets up to speed quickly.

Second of all, although her experience is limited, it has been the right kind of experience. I also like the fact that she ISN't one of those folks who have been around the political block forever. Fresh face, fresh ideas. Don't discount that. (After all, isn't that why so many folks are nuts for Obama?)

Third, there is NO ONE else out there, male or female that would have excited me. I am frankly as thrilled McCain DIDN'T pick Romney as I am that he DID pick Palin. I detest Romney. None of his reputed top four choices were people I was particularly interested in.

Fourth, don't underestimate the fact that there were a lot of folks out here planning to sit out the election because of their dislike of McCain, my own son one of them. Many of these folks are rethinking that position.
posted by konolia at 6:07 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


If Gov Palin did indeed cover up her daughter's pregnancy by claiming the child as her own

The "evidence" for this claim is that Palin allegedly doesn't "look pregnant" in photos taken from October 2007-April 2008, while her daughter allegedly does "look pregnant": "Well, Sarah, I'm calling you a liar. And not even a good one. Trig Paxson Van Palin is not your son. He is your grandson... Bristol is pregnant in these pictures. She is not carrying belly fat, which grows outwardly wide, and does not become dome-shaped."

Except:

1) Sarah Palin wore loose and/or heavy clothes during this period. It was winter in Alaska. While many people were unable to notice, some people who observed her in person in the final months quickly recognized that she was pregnant: "Of course I had to check out the “Hottest Governor in the US” and quickly turned to see her pregnant (she has since had her baby) with bags and daughter in tote."

2) Palin's own doctor has been quoted in the press about the birth and performing delivery procedures on Palin: "... she consulted with her doctor, family physician Cathy Baldwin-Johnson... The contractions slowed to one or two an hour, "which is not active labor," the doctor said... Baldwin-Johnson said she had to induce labor, and the baby didn't come until 6:30 a.m. Friday."

3) The photo of Bristol Palin's alleged pregnant belly was taken in late 2006 or early 2007; the children in the photo are all clearly listed as 2 years younger than they are now. Was Bristol Palin pregnant for 15 months?


So can we please stop humiliating a teenage girl yet?
posted by dgaicun at 6:12 AM on August 31, 2008 [12 favorites]


Wow, I hope that the Palins are not in charge of naming any more people or things. Cuz, Trig? Wow.
posted by Mister_A at 6:39 AM on August 31, 2008


He is someone I trust with foreign policy

That's a stunning admission. The man who sees military intervention as the solution to almost every international kerfuffle, in addition to his doubling and tripling and quadrupling down in Iraq because his ego won't permit him to admit that he was wrong?

This is someone that I don't want ANYWHERE NEAR foreign policy.
posted by psmealey at 6:59 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


So can we please stop humiliating a teenage girl yet?

Agreed.

Guys, by all reports she's been breastfeeding this child. While it is possible to induce lactation in a woman who has not given birth, its difficult. If she is nursing this baby, it'll be obvious to just about everyone who works with her or travels with her -- even if its just that she's disapearing every so often to pump and then there's bottles of breastmilk in the 'fridge.
posted by anastasiav at 7:08 AM on August 31, 2008


DEMOCRATS TAKE WARNING: McCain just closed the evangelical vote
Oh please. Evangelicals are extremists, and will show up to vote for Republicans no matter who is on the ticket. Does anyone seriously believe otherwise? Is there any data suggesting right-wing extremists were going to stay home on election day until Palin was announced? Color me extremely skeptical. Yes, they may now be making ringing endorsements of her, but that is not the same as them changing their vote. These people are thoroughly invested in the Republican party and will vote for them no matter who is VP.

Look, there is an ongoing culture war in this country that still hasn't come to head. We saw a lot of it in the 60s, and it has reared its ugly head now and then in the interim, and we're seeing it again in full force now. There's a huge divide in this country, and a lot of people fall on the Conservative side, whether you guys like it or not. To them, it's not so much about embracing Republican policies as it is about rejecting progressive ideas, because they are threatening to them.

The Republican party grokked this over a decade ago and have had so much success that they've transformed every aspect of this country to be in line with their beliefs, but somehow the supposedly smarter Liberals still have no fucking clue. Seriously, they have control of almost every aspect of this country -- our media, our economy, our social values -- and you still want to underestimate them because they are "stupid". Who's really being stupid here? The losers? Really, how does that work?

I think all the hand-wringing I see here about the VP choice is misguided. On the one hand you have the hopeless optimists who think that somehow her being a poor choice will hurt McCain's campaign. All I have to say to these people is, were you paying attention in 2004? Then on the other hand we have the cynics who think that somehow this decision was a hard-hitting blow to Obama's chances. What I say to you: We are already facing certain defeat. We are just going through the motions. No one except extreme partisans (like myself) give a shit about policy details. "Swing voters" (aka the stupidest people on the planet) will vote Republican because they hate faggots, niggers, and hippies (sorry for offensive terms). Spend less time on Internet forums and talk to these people and realize that their opinion is entirely based on hatred for one or more of the above.

The Republican party has cunningly capitalized on these fears and cultivated a boogeyman -- the Liberal -- while the Democrats have sat around arguing amongst themselves about whether everyone should be treated as if they were smart or stupid. We are fucking failing.

I really really hope I'm wrong about everything, and that Obama will sweep this election and steer our country back in the direction we deserve. I don't see this happening right now though. The extreme cluelessness I see in this thread about what's really happening in this election makes me very depressed.
posted by cj_ at 7:15 AM on August 31, 2008 [6 favorites]


Also, yes, lay off the "her 16yo daughter got pregnant and she pretended to be the mother" angle. Just let it go. It's almost certainly the case, but what you don't realize is that calling her out for this will totally backfire. I don't know about everyone else here, but I come from a disfunctional family myself. Attacking this woman's family is a sure way to look like an asshole.

I know you think that it makes her a hypocrite for being against birth control. But in reality she's being extremely consistent with her stated beliefs.
posted by cj_ at 7:28 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Also, yes, lay off the "her 16yo daughter got pregnant and she pretended to be the mother" angle. Just let it go. It's almost certainly the case...


Oh for fucks sake, did you even read my post? The whole basis for the rumor is a "pregnant" picture of the daughter.... taken in 2006!


... derrr, looks ma, da evydence Ubama is Muzzum.
posted by dgaicun at 7:38 AM on August 31, 2008


Oh please. Evangelicals are extremists, and will show up to vote for Republicans no matter who is on the ticket. Does anyone seriously believe otherwise? Is there any data suggesting right-wing extremists were going to stay home on election day until Palin was announced? Color me extremely skeptical. Yes, they may now be making ringing endorsements of her, but that is not the same as them changing their vote. These people are thoroughly invested in the Republican party and will vote for them no matter who is VP.

You're right, Evangelicals can be counted on to turn out for the Republican candidate. Many of them weren't that jazzed about McCain and as mefi's own Konolia said, his VP choice has brought excitement to the base. This is the difference between between blowing off going to the polling place if the weather is bad or something comes up and making sure you go. This is the difference between getting you just voting and getting up early and making sure you vote and everyone you know votes. That's what Gov. Palin brings.

It it won't matter in New York or California which are solid blue. The choice didn't matter in the solid red states. It comes down to the rural counties in the swing states. Like 2000 and 2004 it will come down to one or two states. Obama has been successful at getting out the vote but a lot of that success is in the places that would have voted for the democrat anyway.

Rove et al, aren't stupid. Clearly McCain has sold his soul to the machine to win this election at any cost. The straight talker from 2000 would kick the McCain of today's ass.
posted by birdherder at 7:51 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


The whole basis for the rumor is a "pregnant" picture of the daughter

Nah, there's more. It's the sudden announcement at 7 months, the leaking of fluid in Texas, yet insistence on giving a speech and then taking and 8 flight back and then going driving 45 minutes to a rural doctor to deliver the baby.

Even if the rumor isn't true, the above makes ya wonder about her judgement.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 7:53 AM on August 31, 2008


Let me spell it out....she and her husband have been blue collar workers. She will understand the blue collar subculture. And blue collar people will relate to her.

Dear Konolia,

Answer me this. If Sarah Palin was a pro-life evangelical Republican named Muffy McFancyPants Rothschild-Rockefeller IV, you would still probably vote for her. But would you still call her "refreshing" and praise her ability to relate to blue-collar workers? You'd look pretty silly if you did.

You're a single-issue voter on the abortion issue. That's fine. That's your right as an American. I can even view it as noble, because as you see it, you believe that you are saving defenseless lives. What gets my goat (and probably gets the goat of some other MeFites too) is the disingenuous dog-whistle appeals and references to fishing, "America," the blue-collar subculture etc. etc.

I'm assuming you don't mean anything malicious by this. You don't seem like a prejudiced person to me. But when you say about Sarah Palin "She IS America," that really does legitimately irk some people, because it comes in the context of a fringe of McCain supporters who insist that Barack Obama is NOT America and CANNOT BE America. An evangelical pro-life Alaskan ex-beauty queen, mooseburger-eating, commercial-fishing, fur-wearing, recently pregnant governor IS America. But so is the interracial son of a Kenyan economist and a Kansas anthropologist, the grandson of Hawaiian grandparents, the nephew of a soldier who liberated a concentration camp, the little boy who went to both Catholic and Muslim elementary schools in Indonesia, the Harvard Law Review editor who passed up big bucks to do community organizing for chump change, the University of Chicago professor of constitutional law who played basketball on the side, the Illinois state legislator who won respect by playing in weekly bipartisan poker games with his Republican colleagues, the orator who came out of nowhere in 2004 to give a speech that revived their sense of patriotism and what they stand for... This man IS America too. And a legion of Barack Obama's supporters are not going to let you forget that.
posted by jonp72 at 7:57 AM on August 31, 2008 [58 favorites]


Actually I see Obama as more global. Think about it.

That's not a slam at him, that's actually a feature, and a strong point. But it doesn't help him relate to Joe Sixpack.
posted by konolia at 8:04 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Oh, please. If his father was from Ireland instead of Africa, you wouldn't call him global.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:12 AM on August 31, 2008 [8 favorites]


Right on jonp.
posted by fourcheesemac at 8:13 AM on August 31, 2008


Dear American liberal friends,

IGNORE HER UTERUS. I know that abortion rights are important, but you're not going to protect those rights by making this The Great Big Abortion Election. That's what they're trying to do.

For the first time in a long time, you've got a guy up front who can make the election about populist economic issues and win, and he can quote scripture a hundred times better than the Republican dude. The only way they win this is by dragging you back into another bloody culture war. Which you will lose, because you always lose those. Can't you see that this is what they want?

It doesn't matter how justified you think it might be to talk about her decision to have her baby, or her Secret Baby Conspiracy, or anything else that revolves around her uterus or the uteruses of her immediate family. I don't care how much you think it reveals her hypocrisy, or illuminates the danges of the anti-abortion movement, or whatever. It makes you sound like unpleasant assholes, and it will bring out Karl Rove's base in droves. Just ignore it. Sarah Palin's reproductive system can only lose you this election. So please, please, please do exactly what you've always wanted the government to do, and stay the hell out of it.

Regards, etc.
posted by flashboy at 8:14 AM on August 31, 2008 [13 favorites]


Technically, Michael Scott from "The Office" has more executive experience than Obama, Biden, and McCain.

Scott/Schrute '08!


Being President of the USA isn't about making sure forms are filled out correctly. It's about leadership in the broadest and grandest of senses. It's about having good ideas and communicating them. It's about steering the rudder of a giant "organization". There are NO jobs that fully prepare anyone for that. The only thing that makes a good president is having a vision and communicating and getting people to execute same. And having the intellectual curiosity and fortitude to gather people and facts to help guide that vision.

So can we please stop humiliating a teenage girl yet?

It's only humiliating if it's true and if her family raised her to believe that it was wrong.
posted by gjc at 8:21 AM on August 31, 2008


So, I'm considering the only upside to her selection is her pro-life get-out-the-evangelical-vote appeal. Can anyone explain to me why evangelicals would consider McCain on his own insufficient in this regard, despite his consistent pro-life stance over his 20+ years in DC?

The addition of a VP who may have pro-life OPINIONS, but no demonstrable RECORD (I could be entirely wrong about this, but I can't imagine how a city-council/mayor/governor has opportunity to flex any pro-life muscles) supporting these positions seems like a non-sequitor. This hyper-conservative appeal seems pretty manufactured.
posted by butterstick at 8:24 AM on August 31, 2008


"uteruses"

Such a hard to pronounce word. It lacks pizazz. I posit the following replacements:

uteri
uterati
uteren
uteralia?

Finally, what's the collective noun?
posted by gjc at 8:26 AM on August 31, 2008


Second of all, although her experience is limited, it has been the right kind of experience. I also like the fact that she ISN't one of those folks who have been around the political block forever. Fresh face, fresh ideas. Don't discount that. (After all, isn't that why so many folks are nuts for Obama?)

Frankly, after the trampling the constitution has taken over the last 7 years, I think a distinguished knowledge of constitutional law and a passion for civil rights is the right kind of experience.
posted by milarepa at 8:27 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Nah, there's more. It's the sudden announcement at 7 months, the leaking of fluid in Texas, yet insistence on giving a speech... Even if the rumor isn't true...

Jesus Christ, you really are a moron. Look, if you can't recognize and affirm, in no uncertain terms, what is a baseless, far-fetched political rumor, then you simply aren't an objective person - you are a partisan toad. Which, I guess, is fine, just don't think anyone should take you seriously when you inevitably bitch about partisan toads on the other side of the aisle who are stuck in their own inescapable black holes of partisan toadery.

Your opinion on the ethics a pregnant working mother's choices are noted, but no one outside of your toady blackhole could understand how any of it logically adds up to a convoluted theory that is, in fact, founded on a creepy misanaylsis of a teen girl's body in a misdated photo.
posted by dgaicun at 8:30 AM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


It's only humiliating if it's true and if her family raised her to believe that it was wrong.

Right, because most 16 year old girls would love to have their sex lfe discussed in public, it's not at all creepy that her mother is also part of the discussion.

I switched to the Democratic Party a few years ago because I was better than this kind of Rovian shit, so kindly shut the fuck up.
posted by Mick at 8:36 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


So can we please stop humiliating a teenage girl yet?
It's only humiliating if it's true
I assume that you have never met or been a teenager.
posted by Flunkie at 8:40 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


It's going to turn out to have been a costume, watch.
posted by cashman at 8:42 AM on August 31, 2008


The addition of a VP who may have pro-life OPINIONS, but no demonstrable RECORD (I could be entirely wrong about this, but I can't imagine how a city-council/mayor/governor has opportunity to flex any pro-life muscles) supporting these positions seems like a non-sequitor.

Record or not, any political figure has a chance to frame an issue and influence opinions. Palin didn't join Feminists for Life for nothing. And now we're talking about someone who could be appointing Supreme Court justices in the near future.

IGNORE HER UTERUS. I know that abortion rights are important, but you're not going to protect those rights by making this The Great Big Abortion Election. That's what they're trying to do.

So we don't actively discuss reproductive rights? That's the best way to protect them?

Look, here's what I think the response to her uterus issues ought to be:
Any time a McCain/Palin supporter lauds her for her choice to bring her 5th child to full term (as George Will just did this morning on This Week With George Stephanopoulos), point out that according to her beliefs, she didn't make a choice. We're still trying to suss out exactly what her stance is on contraception, but in the ideology she now represents to some voters, she didn't have a choice on whether or not to become pregnant.
posted by hydrophonic at 8:47 AM on August 31, 2008


I think Cindy MIGHT have something to worry about. McCain called her his soulmate. I think he has a crush.
posted by empath at 8:48 AM on August 31, 2008


re: 16 y.o. daughter is the mother of Trig...

If this story does catch on in the mainstream media, it will be refuted. And the GOP will say it is Obama spreading these terrible personal attacks. This is classic playbook stuff. It doesn't matter and the elite evil liberals attacking the mother of this special needs child will put even more fire into the cause of her supporters.

We've seen this movie before.

Leave this story to the Enquirer and Larry Flynnt, not dailyKOS. If it does turn out to be true, it would be pathetic and sad. It has nothing to do with the issues that are important.

Since People Magazine scored the first interview with Palin, I'm sure OK magazine will follow with "Bristol's Story" if it turns out to be true. The father? Kevin Federline or Alaskan equivalent. And while I'm in the muck, I'll just say that Sarah Palin looks like I could imagine Britney Spears will look when she's 44 if she stays clean.
posted by birdherder at 8:58 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Grampa Feely McSmearpants and the Broad '08 - They're as white as you!
posted by Mental Wimp at 9:08 AM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


Record or not, any political figure has a chance to frame an issue and influence opinions. Palin didn't join Feminists for Life for nothing. And now we're talking about someone who could be appointing Supreme Court justices in the near future.

Still not sure how her membership in FFL motivates the base more than McCain's 20+ year record advocating for pro-life (and anti-woman; voted against Biden's domestic violence bill) legislation. I really can't square this circle, and everything I'm hearing in support of this pick fails to pass scrutiny.

And for the record, I agree that preposterous rumors should remain the domain of the National Enquirer or Star magazine. My candidate (Obama) seems to be on about raising the level of discourse and doing away with identity politics and the politics of personal destruction.
posted by butterstick at 9:13 AM on August 31, 2008


The Republican party grokked this over a decade ago and have had so much success that they've transformed every aspect of this country to be in line with their beliefs, but somehow the supposedly smarter Liberals still have no fucking clue.

Most American's beliefs are in line with liberals on the issues. The Republicans have been very successful in tarnishing the word "liberal," but polls consistently show most Americans hold "liberal" views. They needed media bias and chicanery in the last two elections to barely beat candidates who were less inspiring and who ran worse campaigns than Obama. Since they can't win straight-up on the issues, they rely on fear, divisiveness, and muddying the waters to fool people into voting against their best interests.

This is just going to get worse and worse as the United States becomes a majority-minority country. The crowd at the Democratic convention looked like that new America; a very diverse melting pot. The Republican convention will likely be less diverse.
posted by kirkaracha at 9:22 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I find it absolutely astounding that there are people who want another four years of the same country-destroying political thinking.

Konolia, give your head a shake!
posted by five fresh fish at 9:28 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Your opinion on the ethics a pregnant working mother's choices are noted, but no one outside of your toady blackhole could understand how any of it logically adds up to a convoluted theory that is, in fact, founded on a creepy misanaylsis of a teen girl's body in a misdated photo.

Good morning, dgaicun.

Just a reminder, you wrote the rumor was passed solely on a photo. When I commented that people were actually basing the rumor on more than just a photo, (with no statement from me that I agreed with them), and provided a link to a website about Alaskan politics that demostrated, you response is “You're a moron”, then go on to say that I'm not objective, which you can say about anyone really so it's poor insult, then call me a partisan toad, based on nothing more than a photo couple of comments. Then you proceed to imply that I shouldn't bitch about partisan toads on the other side, since I'm being a partisan toad myself. Geez, could you at least produce a photo of me doing these things before you start accusing me of doing them?

Finally, none of your personal attacks have anything to do with the fact that people are basing this rumor on more than a single photo, despite what you may think and seem to be insisting on.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 9:38 AM on August 31, 2008



Maybe I'm wrong and people will only become more ignorant, but I think the first step to solving these problems is to consider this "stupidity" as a different point of view

Yeah. We should consider an immoral war of aggression, the slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent humans beings, and the immoral occupation and theft of their natural resources (all funded by our tax dollars) as "just another point a view. We should consider the deliberate distortion and subversion of scientific fact for private profit and to the detriment of all human civilization as "as just a different point of view."

It's kinda like how we should consider white supremacy or female genital mutilation as "just other points of view." Oh. Wait. We don't do we.

Well. The policies of this supposed "point of view" are an unmitigated disaster that have real life and death consequences. Wake the fuck up. All of it is made possible because the modern republican party has completely embraced and cultivated ignorance in order to maintain power.

These people SHOULD feel ashamed of these positions and attitudes just like people who are racists should feel ashamed. These attitudes have to be stigmatized and treated precisely as the anathema to modern civilization that they are. treating this level of ignorance as "just another point of view" is simply a tacit endorsement of suicidal stupidity.

Good luck with that.
posted by tkchrist at 9:41 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


I'm not so sure about that. The voters have a right to know, don't you think?

No, they don't. I felt that way about Bill Clinton's infidelity - the only person who had a right to know was Hillary Clinton, and she had a find out in privacy, not while being watched by a nation of peeping perverts. And the voters have even less right to know about the private lives of people who just happened to be related to politicians. Frankly the rumour is patently false, but the fact that it is even being spred is very distasteful. I hope to god that it doesn't make its way out of the muckosphere into the media; if it does, it should be soundly denounced as disgusting by all of the candidates.

Voters have a right to know about corruption, about bribery, about questionable no-bid contracts. They have a right to know about economic performance and military strategy. Why don't we start demanding that our media covers those stories?

There's a reason most of us don't have sex in public; it's a private thing. And if we want to government to stay out of our bedrooms, we should stay out of theirs.
posted by jb at 9:44 AM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


I know it's comforting to have someone leading who has a little worldview, like so many people in small towns, but it's not a direction American needs help finding.

Obama is more global? He IS America, he is far more what we should hope America embodies than an out-of-touch Alaskan that lives in a remote area. Americans should be proud to have a person with a wide-ranging point of view like his leading our country. I honestly think it will be a bit lamentable if more people in American identify with her than with Obama - he has a lot more promise to offer and is a lot more proof of that American Dream.
posted by agregoli at 9:50 AM on August 31, 2008


When John Met Sarah.
posted by ericb at 9:52 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Cindy McCain: Palin knows foreign policy because ‘Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia.’
posted by ericb at 9:53 AM on August 31, 2008 [5 favorites]


on a completely unrelated note -- I was shocked by how very low the number of immigrants in the United States is.

According to the New York Times line above, foreign-born Americans are currently only about 12 percent of the population; the historic high was in the 1910, when nearly 15 percent were foreign-born.

The article does mention how this will likely be exceeded by 2025, and that the percentage may approach 20 percent by 2050. But right now in Canada, almost 20% of our population is foreign-born, and in Australia it is 22.2%. So the two most immigrant heavy countries in the world are Canada and Australia. (Of course, America has many more non-white people (last time I checked, Canada's non-native visible minority population was only about 9%), but not through recent immigration.)

I wonder how this would affect the common view of America as the primary "immigrant nation" if this were more widely known? Why isn't it more commonly known?
posted by jb at 10:01 AM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Cindy McCain: Palin knows foreign policy because ‘Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia.’

I was just coming to post that video, ericb. You have GOT to be kidding me. You can't be serious. The possible first lady is saying that? You have got to be kidding me. No come on, this has to be a joke. Seriously?
posted by cashman at 10:05 AM on August 31, 2008




Man. And she has "foreign policy experience" because of Alaska's proximity to 'Russia?" But Poin has ever BEEN to "Russia." In fact Sarah Palin didn't have a passport until 2007? Jeebus Chronst.

I rest my god damned case. Do we need any more proof how stupid people are to buy into such total bullshit.
posted by tkchrist at 10:14 AM on August 31, 2008


And her total foreign travel experience consists of a one trip to visit Alaskan National Guard troops in Kuwait and Germany and a second trip to Ireland.
posted by ericb at 10:21 AM on August 31, 2008


The other reason why the "is-she or isn't-she Trig's mom?" story is a non-starter is this: I can tell you, as someone who survived an evangelical upbringing, and as someone whose family is still largely evangelical, that even if the rumor proved to be true, the evangelicals will love her all the more for it.

You're talking about a culture in which teen pregnancy is still seen as a massive moral failure, something worth of shame. A mother taking on the child of her child would be regarded as a hero, someone who is willing to go to any length to protecting her family, their reputation, and the life her daughter is carrying.

Trust me: it's not the kind of thing that would lose her any support among her already-ardent fanbase, and the dems would be very, very wise to let it lie.
posted by shiu mai baby at 10:37 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


I'm not so sure about that. The voters have a right to know [about the baby rumor], don't you think? Perhaps the matter could be cleared up by calling several hundred thousand

I'm not really sure about that; I mean it doesn't really seem relevant. But the other thing is, someone mentioned up thread that Down Syndrom is very rare in babies born to teen mothers, and it's much more common in women who have children later in life. So it's much more likely that Sarah is the true mother. All of the pictures on this page don't really show Sarah's Belly at all, she always is wearing something loose and frumpy.

And anyway, there would never be any way to prove any of this, so frankly speculating on it is kind of disgusting.

All I have to say to these people is, were you paying attention in 2004? Then on the other hand we have the cynics who think that somehow this decision was a hard-hitting blow to Obama's chances. What I say to you: We are already facing certain defeat. We are just going through the motions.

You're an idiot.
posted by delmoi at 10:40 AM on August 31, 2008


So many important points raised by that Cindy McCain clip - thanks for posting, ericb.

First, there's my simple scientician's quibble, which I'm wondering if we'll be seeing Sarah Palin making imminently, which is that the proximity of Alaska and Russia isn't as relevant as you might think because there were no people on the earth when there was a Bering land bridge, because there have only been people on earth for maybe 6,000 years. Because that, as Cindy McCain so eloquately speaks, is the experience that she comes from.

Second, and perhaps most pertinent, is that I believe you can raise the PT Barnum Principle to the power of ten when it comes to geography. To wit: no one ever lost election (and indeed some maybe even won a few) by underestimating the average American's knowledge of basic geography. Never mind that there's a swath of almost impassable wilderness perhaps twice as wide as America itself between Wasilla and Moscow. Both places are, you know, like way up there somewhere like almost in China or Asia or something, vis a vis konolia's semi-mythic lunchbucket sixpack heartland masses.

Third, and I can't say this more emphatically, I find myself amazed anew by the American political process every four years like some newborn babe in the darkest and most fairydusted of woods. I think surely it can't get any weirder or sillier or more debased without it coming apart at the seams like some Wile E. Coyote contraption and sending the whole mess hurtling to the canyon floor. And then there you go, the RNC convention is set to start the same day the city it abandoned to nature's fate a few years back in probably the most egregious bureaucratic and humanitarian failure in American history, a city still waiting in many areas for a concerted reconstruction effort, is about to be leveled once again, not even to get into the trillion-dollar war boondoggle or the asinine just-keep-drilling energy policy - and a more significant thread in the conversation is about whether the nakedly incompetent GOP VP candidate has learned enough about Russian affairs by some kind of osmotic process to be able to run the country.

Bravo, America - I am again rendered breathless and gape-jawed at the spectacle.

By the way, konolia, I'm keenly aware this whole post reeks of elitism, but then by your definition - i.e. being even marginally curious about things happening outside your electoral district - I'm pretty sure the vast majority of the population of my home and native land constitutes an elite. We're all okay with that.
posted by gompa at 10:40 AM on August 31, 2008 [17 favorites]


It appears konolia and her church gang are single-issue voters.

Excuse me if this has been brought up (I've only waded through 2/3 of the comments), but the "church gang" isn't going to be as unified on this as you think. The some segments of extreme conservative right wing aren't going to vote for a woman in a position of power over men. Church of Christ, Pentecostals, some Catholics... maybe Mormons or Hassidic Jews (I don't know what their line is on this). I grew up in the rural South, and I knew people like this.

But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God” (1 Corinthians 11:3)

But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1 Timothy 2:12-14

[As for] my people, children [are] their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause [thee] to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
Isaiah 3:12


These are the arguments trotted out to keep women out of leadership roles in the church, but it also appear to pertain to female referees. So yeah... Palin isn't going to go over for a lot of christian zealots.
posted by kimdog at 10:41 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Palin drawing women's attention, maybe not allegiance
"Some, particularly women leaning toward a Republican ticket or who share Palin's staunch anti-abortion views, see it as a winning choice that they can happily embrace. But others, particularly the undecided women McCain is trying to reach, say this is the wrong woman, lacking experience and on the wrong side of the issues, like abortion, the Iraq war and the environment, that matter most to them.

Some Clinton stalwarts took offense, saying they felt as if McCain had decided that, for women disappointed that they could not vote for Clinton, any woman would do. 'It's an insult,' said Jan Roller, a Clinton delegate from Cleveland, as she arrived home from the convention. 'You have to be qualified for the job.'"
posted by ericb at 10:41 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


"This surely is the kind of decision-maker McCain turns out to be: ignore your true instincts (Lieberman), throw the dice and hope you don't shoot craps. It's how the Palin decision seems to have been made, and the lack of input and communication has upset Republicans from Romney to Pawlenty, stuck on the Sunday shows to gamely bear witness to the 'good first impression' unknown who nonetheless is a weak VP pick based on qualifications. Hockey mom that she is, she herself should understand that she is an up-and-comer, a future draft choice, not a current first line player. That has nothing to do with her, and everything to do with her resume. No one can 'make up for that' by being charming, and, by the way, a mom. Those are not the only qualifications for being President, something we'll (alas) see on Monday and Tuesday when Gustav hits (a warning to Republicans: politicizing a storm of this potential is a career ender.)

The one thing it does is excite the creationist base. And the one thing that an Obama win will do is to drive home the point that they are not the majority in this country, merely the decision-makers in the Republican party.

If you read the pundits and the news stories, the longer the Palin choice is out there, the worse it looks. And it highlights the essential element of the Republican party, the social conservatives, who simply are not a majority in this country. Presumably the people who think we are moving in the right direction as a country and think Brownie did a heckuva job will love it." *
posted by ericb at 10:47 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Frank Rich | NYTimes
"The main reason McCain knuckled under to the religious right by picking Palin is that he actually believes there’s a large army of embittered Hillary loyalists who will vote for a hard-line conservative simply because she’s a woman. That’s what happens when you listen to the TV news echo chamber. Not only is the whole premise ludicrous, but it is every bit as sexist as the crude joke McCain notoriously told about Janet Reno, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton.

Given the press’s track record so far, there’s no reason to believe that the bogus scenarios will stop now."
posted by ericb at 10:49 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Shannen Coffin | National Review
"The choice also says a lot about McCain. First, that he is a bit desparate. McCain likely thought it would be difficult to make a splash with a conventional Republican sidekick. Changing the subject from Thursday's Obama-thon would be difficult with Mit Romney or Kay Bailey Hutchinson (who would have been an awful choice anyway) by his side. The choice of Palin certainly gives us all something new to talk about. And she is fresh, smart (as far as I can tell from a brief time studying her), enthusiastic and energetic. But it is a bit of a political Hail Mary pass. Second, that he is one arrogant SOB. McCain is essentially telling the world that he doesn't really need a Vice President. It is hard to imagine Palin playing the same sort of role that modern Vice Presidents like Gore, Bush, Cheney, or Mondale played. Rather, the Office would seem poised to return to the 'proverbial warm bucket of p***' category. McCain has thus made a purely political play without regard for the governance concerns. And how could he really have a good idea of how she would govern? My understanding is that he only met with her once before choosing her."
posted by ericb at 10:52 AM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


...someone mentioned up thread that Down Syndrom is very rare in babies born to teen mothers, and it's much more common in women who have children later in life.

"80% of the cases of Down's Syndrome are in mother's under the age of 35."
posted by ericb at 10:57 AM on August 31, 2008


"There could be calls...that this type of information [investigating the Bristol Palin preganancy rumor] is muckraking and 'below us'. The truth is not below any progressive, nor any citizen of the world that is one heartbeat away from having Palin as leader of the free world. We simply ask that she be forthright, honest, and not waste our time with such juvenile games that anyone with eyes can see as fabrication.

Bristol Palin rightfully should be able to embrace her child in public as her own, with no shame, and no quarter. And a mother should be just as accepting." *
posted by ericb at 11:00 AM on August 31, 2008


You could spend the rest of your life pointing out the utterly un-Christian, hateful immorality of Palin's hypocrisies and McCain's voting record to folks like Konolia. She and her friends will goose-step right into the voting booth for Palin.

You won't make a single-issue voter vote for Obama. But if you give them enough reasons to dislike any of the candidates, they may stay home. And a lot of evangelicals were not warming up to McCain--until now.
posted by schroedinger at 11:10 AM on August 31, 2008


"80% of the cases of Down's Syndrome are in mother's under the age of 35."
ericb, that's one of the most disingenuous uses of statistics that I've seen in a long, long time.

Yes, most children with Down Syndrome are born to mothers under the age of 35.

Most children are born to mothers under the age of 35.

And "35"? Why "35"? We're talking about a sixteen year old. The chance of the child of a sixteen year old having Down Syndrome is very, very small.

You should be embarrassed to use a statistic like this to back an argument like this.
posted by Flunkie at 11:12 AM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


ericb, I can understand your argument that "Babygate" would be a legitimate topic, but only if it were true. I think dgaicun's post does an excellent job of debunking the pregnancy rumor. In order for the Babygate conspiracy to be true, you'd need doctors and all the reporters who noticed she was pregnant to be in on the conspiracy. That doesn't survive Occam's Razor. That doesn't survive even basic common sense. Palin has so many other weaknesses as both a candidate and as a potential successor to the presidency that it's nonsensical to go making up smears out of whole cloth.
posted by jonp72 at 11:16 AM on August 31, 2008


Cindy McCain: Palin knows foreign policy because 'Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia.'

As Jon Stewart pointed out, "Alaska's also near the North Pole, so she must also be friends with Santa."

the 'is-she or isn't-she Trig's mom?' story is a non-starter

Also, it was plot line on Desperate Housewives.
posted by kirkaracha at 11:16 AM on August 31, 2008


I really hope the specter of this whole sister/mother brou-ha-ha dies down quickly. It will not serve Obama's case a whit and is just degrading to all involved.

Personally, I never got very big when pregnant and if I had the significant boobage that Sarah Palin has (I figure that and the glasses are where the sexy librarian tag comes from - I don't think she has the well read, funky intellectual look that I would ascribe to a sexy librarian) perhaps I could have hidden a pregnancy for months.

There will never be a definitive answer, so why bother? People's lives are often messy. I think she didn't announce her pregnancy widely because it may have been a bit of a suprise and she may have been thinking that there may be a miscarriage of some sort, so why involve the public at large? She may have miscarried before - and it is none of our business, really.

I say, let her talk and listen to her. She will talk about two things - family values and Gasoline prices/opening up ANWAR. That's what they picked her to do. I see her as a a boon to both things that are meaningful to people not paying close attention, abortion/baby killing and why does gas cost so much? I'm sure she will make it seem that cheap gas is just around the corner, thanks to her great state of Alaska - but enviromental elitists are sticking their hand in your pocket for some pie in the sky thinking.

She will put her foot in her mouth at some point, but the die hard, one issue voters will vote McCain anyway.
posted by readery at 11:22 AM on August 31, 2008


Maybe I'm wrong and people will only become more ignorant, but I think the first step to solving these problems is to consider this "stupidity" as a different point of view

Have you seen Idiocracy? The only problem is I think Mike Judge's dystopian future of complete idiots and giant megacorporations is happening a lot faster than expected.

And the Cindy McCain foreign policy experience because lives close to Alaska? That's bullshit! On my map Alaska is down off the coast of California next to Hawaii.

When Steve Dooce said that on Fox and Friends on Friday I expected it coming from him. I know nothing about Cindy McCain (except I did see her in person once when I was in the same office building as McCain's office in Phoenix) but I thought she'd be a little smarter than Steve Dooce.

I have more experience negotiating with the Russians than Palin does. Sure, it was a brief matter of standing before passport control when I entered and left Moscow. But just because I live in the state next to Mexico doesn't mean I'm an expert on it (but more of an expert on it than Palin is of Russia because at least I've been to Mexico!)

If they (the Republicans) were going to tout foreign policy experience, I'm sure she's actually had some meeting with Canada over that pipeline project. That's real. It's not as sexy as Russia, but it is more credible than proximity on a map.
posted by birdherder at 11:30 AM on August 31, 2008


ericb, I can understand your argument that "Babygate" would be a legitimate topic...

It's not my argument. I was posting what the author of the DailyKOS blog diary presents as his/her argument. Those are not my words....it's a quote with a hyperlink to the original.
posted by ericb at 11:37 AM on August 31, 2008


I really hope the specter of this whole sister/mother brou-ha-ha dies down quickly. It will not serve Obama's case a whit and is just degrading to all involved.

The Obama camp won't touch it with a ten-foot pole.

The rumor -- like those having been spread about Obama -- will have a life of its own online, in conversations, etc. Expect more.

Remember the rumor in 2000 claiming John McCain had fathered a "black baby?" "Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" "Christian conservatives eagerly spread baseless rumors that McCain had consorted with prostitutes, another old Clinton-bashing smear, and that he was also homosexual."*

It's all out of the Rove playbook, but this time coming from other quarters.
posted by ericb at 11:49 AM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Was Bristol Palin pregnant for 15 months?

the days are long in alaska...
posted by quonsar at 11:50 AM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


So we don't actively discuss reproductive rights? That's the best way to protect them?

Look, here's what I think the response to her uterus issues ought to be:
Any time a McCain/Palin supporter lauds her for her choice to bring her 5th child to full term (as George Will just did this morning on This Week With George Stephanopoulos), point out that according to her beliefs, she didn't make a choice.


There's a world of difference between camly and cleary stating your policy on reproductive rights (which is the sensible approach) and dirt-digging on the specific reproductive choices of the Republican vice-presidential candidate (which makes you look mean, hypocritical and not a little crazy). They're the ones that want to make Palin into a poster-girl for the abortion debate. They're the ones framing the issue. The way to win that game is to not play it.

The American left keeps losing elections when they turn into culture wars. This isn't because you're in a minority when it comes to the actual policies, but because it energises the other side far more than you, and because it makes floating voters irrationally scared of you. Unless you think that the reason you keep losing culture wars is because you just weren't quite shrill and patronising enough last time round, then surely you see that the best way to protect reproductive rights is to win the damn election?
posted by flashboy at 11:53 AM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Rumor Control: Keeping Momentum in a Presidential Campaign.
posted by ericb at 11:53 AM on August 31, 2008


I just hope this election doesn't become a taste of whether America is more racist, or more sexist.Deathalicious

Forgive me for coming to this realization rather late – but is the GOP presuming, on the strategy of appeasing Hillary backers/PUMAs with a female running-mate, that their objective was not to have a Woman reach the historic threshold on their watch first – but rather, that the important thing was to have a woman reach it ahead of any black person?
Mindful there must be women still bitter enough to remind us females were left without voting rights even after black male US citizens won theirs early last century; one preceded the other. But I can’t believe McCain’s strategists honestly thought you could simultaneously target disgruntled Hillary supporters AND the right wing conservatives with *just any* woman, unless this underlying racist sentiment is at the heart of it.

oops, she probably has five (undocumented?) nannies! -- Surfurrus

Which is why I fail to see the mainstream appeal of Palin’s mommy factor. Many middle-class or lower-class families are stretched thin by unplanned pregnancies reaching to child #4 or 5; how is the celebration of a privileged family (no different than President Carter with his four, including a daughter arriving late in life? This didn’t endear him any more to the voter base we speak of did it?) able to tend to multiple children without being sunk into debt a reflection of the needs of struggling mothers that most typify the target demographic?

That said – she must have nannies! With a workout schedule of 7-10 miles a day, even running an 11-minute mile (in that high elevation, at her age, we’re talking a very fit person!) yet it would still consume 1 ½-2 hours of her daily routine, plus governing and traveling (i.e. a guest speaker in TX when her latest newborn came due). When *does* she get to see or raise her kids with that schedule? Celebrity-status indeed – even Brangelina can tote Baby #5 and #6 without it causing mid-Americana to ‘relate’ more to them, nor qualifying them to juggle VP responsibilities as if they were just residences (3 chez Palin) to manage or PTA meetings to keep up?
posted by skyper at 11:54 AM on August 31, 2008


October 2007: Top 10 Craziest Rumors about the 2008 Candidates.
posted by ericb at 11:55 AM on August 31, 2008


I almost hate to say this, simply because the derailment of the Republican ticket would be so spectacularly wonderful if the daughter/grandchild rumour were true, but...

In that Daily Kos video, she actually does look about 5 months pregnant in the wider closing shots from 9:30 - 10:00. I'm a little surprised to see her walking down snowy, wet Alaskan streets in heels, but I'm hardly prepared to start dictating to pregnant women what constitutes appropriate attire in pregnancy.

Additionally, there's been a lot of noise about the unlikelihood of her daughter having mono for that extended a period. I'm prepared to believe it isn't typical, but when I had mono I was exceedingly ill for more than six months and wasn't able to return to work or school for a year - I was that sick for that long.

Don't get me wrong - I hate this woman's politics and I think she's a grossly under qualified VP, and there's no chance I'd vote for her. But until there's some actual evidence to prove otherwise, I'm prepared to believe this child is hers. There are enough reasons to point and laugh at Sarah Palin without picking apart her bump and her choices about how to manage her labour and delivery. I believe in a woman's right to choose is tied to her right to privacy, and that choices around pregnancy and birth are private matters. I'd be a hypocritical liberal if I didn't apply that standard to Palin just because she doesn't want that standard to apply to me. Or any one else, for that matter.
posted by DarlingBri at 12:08 PM on August 31, 2008


"The governor's labor began while she was in Texas, and I do know that she got on a plane and landed in Anchorage late last night," said Palin spokeswoman Sharon Leighow.
-From the Anchorage Daily News, April, 2008.

For me, this is the most damning piece of material supporting the claims that the kid isn't hers. There is no way in hell a woman with four prior labors gets on a plane and flys six hours to Anchorage in labor. I seriously doubt labor would last half that long in most G5's, and don't imagine most flight crews would even consent to fly her anywhere other than the nearest hospital.

So yes, I suspect the rumors are spot on.
posted by docpops at 12:21 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


The Top 10 Rumors article is interesting -- it had Edwards' affair in October of last year.
posted by empath at 12:28 PM on August 31, 2008


It's not the pictures of the supposedly 7-months pregnant Palin but the other facts surrounding Palin's pregnancy that are failing the sniff test for my wife and some other women i know.

And, if it turns out to be true, my deepest sympathies for the daughter, but I do think Palin should be taken to task for it. This woman is essentially applying to be my overlord, to have the resources of the nation marshaled to protect and exalt her in a way that they will not for the so-called average citizen with whom she supposedly has so very much in common.

She is applying for a position that will make her parts of groups and councils that wield tremendous power over not just American citizens but billions of souls on this orb. If she deserves such a position, she had better be head and shoulders above the rest of us in ways that matter to the job at hand. Engaging in an epic cover-up should disqualify her.

In fact, were I on a hiring committee, I would strongly advise against hiring a person who had done something such as what she is alleged to have done: even if there's no there there with regard to an alleged scandal of covering up a teenage pregnancy , flying and not reporting the leaking of amniotic fluid is, according to my wife and other mothers, an act of astonishing negligence that indicates poor judgment.

With all that said, and whatever the outcome of the Republican VP drama, I'm looking forward to seeing huge voter turnout this year. I recall stories of civics teachers crying in 2004 due to low voter turnout, and whatever else happens, I don't think that's going to be the case in 2008.
posted by lord_wolf at 12:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


speaking of McCain's black baby rumors ... seriously, why is his adopted daughter never with them in photos? I've very literally never seen her. He poses with his family for people and doesn't include her?
posted by Bookhouse at 12:33 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


flying and not reporting the leaking of amniotic fluid is, according to my wife and other mothers, an act of astonishing negligence that indicates poor judgment.

I didn't even go there because I assume she flew charter, but yeah, motherfucking hell, if she flew commercial with ruptured membranes then I really don't even know where to point fingers, as such a thing speaks to negligence and stupidity that is beyond baffling. It would place serious questions of whether she really though through the incredible risks to her child if it were born at 36K feet without medical support.

On a different note, if she can't even pull off a ruse of covering up her kids pregnancy by not travelling in the final weeks, then I bet Cheneys gotta be shitting himself that such a naive piker is going to be trying to fill his steel-toed loafers.
posted by docpops at 12:46 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


docpops, Alaska Airlines is on record as saying it has no restrictions on pregnant passengers. There are a couple of quotes from them that I've read today, I just can't locate them right now. As to progression from an amniotic fluid to the actual birth, here's some information for you on typical presentations. There is nothing really conclusive here about her judgement one way or the other. Any number of things could have been happening there; my best guess is that if this baby is hers, she sprung a slow leak in Texas and gave birth a day later, so in retrospect, the spokeswoman says "her labour began in Texas." But in actual fact, membrane rupture is not synonymous with labour: "If you are close to your due date and have ruptured your membranes, labor usually begins within 24 hours." You can hang around for days with a slow leak and no labour at all, though.

I'm just really uncomfortable with the idea that how a women chooses to conduct her labour and delivery is reflection of her political judgement. Like I said, Palin's political judgement is poor enough on its own merits without having to put her in stirrups for added ammo.
posted by DarlingBri at 12:53 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I bet Cheneys gotta be shitting himself that such a naive piker is going to be trying to fill his steel-toed loafers.

Cheney doesn't give a shit. His work here is done. He may have failed at war on Iran (although there are still 4 months left of his reign), but the Georgia/Russia conflict was a nice bit of work.
posted by kimdog at 1:03 PM on August 31, 2008


A known fluid leak typically sets the clock ticking for delivery within 24 hours, after which the risk of infection goes up. Someone who is aware of a rupture, or even if it might just be urine, is taking chances that seem unusual and/or inappropriate in today's climate. Maybe it's an Alaska thing. Nonetheless, unless her prior births were quite long, the idea of flying with a presumed amniotic fluid leak so you can deliver in your home state instead of any of a dozen top institutions withing a few hundred miles seems insane.
posted by docpops at 1:04 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Did you mean: "...without having to put her in stirrups for added amnio"?
posted by ericb at 1:04 PM on August 31, 2008


I, too, think that the rumors around the Palin child should be dropped. Just remember, McCain has Karl Rove on his team and digging too deep here will just give them an opening for their own accusations:

"If you knew that Senator Obama fathered not only one but two black children, would you be more or less likely to vote for him?"
posted by sour cream at 1:07 PM on August 31, 2008


Docpops must not be an obstetrician. I KNOW the press doesn't have a medical degree.

Occasionally we women do spring a leak re amniotic fluid, and as was mentioned above, labor does not automatically start.

Speaking of baby bumps, one of the gals I know at church is due to deliver in one and one half months. She barely HAS a baby bump.

Now it is true most women look pretty big that far along. I did. My daughter did. But I have known -and seen-some women (most pretty fit) who literally do not show or show very little till almost right up to due date.

And I think the rumor that this woman hid her daughter's pregnancy by pretending to be pregnant is about the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my entire life.
posted by konolia at 1:09 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


(Okay, docpops might know what he is talking about, on lack of preview, but still.)

By the way, it would not surprise me in the least if Alaskan medical culture was a lot more relaxed in areas like pregnancy and labor management.
posted by konolia at 1:12 PM on August 31, 2008


"On Friday, April 18th, 2008, Sarah and her husband Todd were in Dallas, Texas for a Republican Governor's Convention. They had been in town for three days already, but Sarah had yet to give her keynote speaker address on energy policy. Then early Friday morning at 4:00am, Sarah began leaking amniotic fluid. Instead of checking into a hospital, she instead made a call to her doctor, and delivered the keynote speech.
'I was not going to miss that speech,' she says.

She rushed so quickly from the podium afterwards that Texas Gov. Rick Perry nervously asked if she was about to deliver the baby then.
The oddities only grow from here on, as instead of rushing to a Dallas medical facility that could treat a mother who's amniotic fluid has been draining for hours on end (made even more crucial due to the fact that this is occurring a full month prematurely), Sarah & Todd instead opted to... fly all the way back from Texas to Alaska. A dangerous choice, as with each pregnancy (once again, in this case after four previous), a mother's window of labor to delivery grows shorter and shorter.

Aboard Alaska Airlines, the flight lasted for eight hours, with an additional landing in Seattle. The majority of commercial airlines require mothers seven months pregnant to provide a doctor's letter to fly, but Sarah did not inform the airline of her condition. Alaska Airlines is one of the few airlines that do not require such a notice, despite the possibility of an emergency landings being required in such scenarios. That said, no one on board noticed that Sarah was going into labor:
'"We leave the decision to fly up to our customers and their medical advisers," according to Alaska Airlines representative Caroline Boren.

...'Governor Palin was extremely pleasant to flight attendants and her stage of pregnancy was not apparent by observation as she didn’t show any signs of distress,' Boren said."
Eight months pregnant. A 6.2 pound fetus. No one notices a visible trace. By the third trimester, a perfectly fit woman not wearing anything less than a space suit should be easily spotted as pregnant. Not in Sarah's case.

The plane then made a landing in Anchorage, Alaska. Does Sarah then visit a medical facility that can accommodate a premature birth in Alaska's most equipped city? No. She drives 45 minutes away, to Mat-Su Regional Medical Center, right outside the small village she used to govern as Mayor, Wasilla. Trig Palin is then delivered one month premature, Friday night. Sarah returned to work after three days.

The inherent need to absolutely have Trig delivered in a remote and possibly ill-equipped facility for premature deliveries, where Sarah would likely have numerous contacts and pull, does not sit well. The doctor, Cathy Baldwin-Johnson, approving of all of these actions borders on malpractice. Not treating leaking amniotic fluid causes infections, and time is of the essence after water breaks. Husband Todd Palin simply delivers this winner of a line:
'You can't have a fish picker from Texas,' said Todd."*
posted by ericb at 1:13 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Alaskan medical culture...

Huh? Because they're hicks or sumtin'?
posted by ericb at 1:14 PM on August 31, 2008


BTW, for you Obama fans, you might want to work on something...I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.

Also, at church people kept coming up to me all excited about the election now. That is definitely new. So if McCain's purpose was to get the Christians to get out and vote in November, I think he has accomplished it. (My son btw still doesn't trust him, thinks he is using Palin for political gain, and will be writing in a candidate on principle.)
posted by konolia at 1:18 PM on August 31, 2008


Palin judged that she would be fine, and Palin's doctor agreed with her judgment:

""I don't think it was unreasonable for her to continue to travel back," [Palin's doctor] Baldwin-Johnson said...This was going to be Palin's last flight anyway, her doctor said.

Alaska Airlines has no such rule and leaves the decision to the woman and her doctor, said spokeswoman Caroline Boren."



How any of this logically supports a comically byzantine mother-daughter swircheroo conspiracy theory (which was originally predicated on incompetent and easily debunked photo "evidence"), I sure don't know, but a lot of mouth-breathers seem to really want to see it.
posted by dgaicun at 1:21 PM on August 31, 2008


I bet Cheneys gotta be shitting himself that such a naive piker is going to be trying to fill his steel-toed loafers.
Joe Biden is not a naive piker.
posted by Flunkie at 1:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Docpops must not be an obstetrician.

No konolia, I'm a Family Practicioner. But for three years in the last decade I delivered over 200 infants, and a large part of my residency was spent practicing prenatal care in an inner city clinic which was rich with high-risk young pregnancy, so my comments are based on a lot more than shit-stirring speculation, but I get your point. It may seem unbelievable to you, but I really couldn't care less about the 'rumor' - the conservatives seem to have long since made peace with the fact that their idiotic policies about sex education have merely resulted in more illegitimate grandkids to raise, so I'm mostly baffled why someone who seems to be pretty self-assured and grounded, and whose platform of honesty got her into office wouldn't just come out with the truth.

Again, a rational person does not fly eight hours on a plane with ruptured membranes, especially when you know the baby is high risk, as Down's kids often have heart defects that would make the presence of a neonatal resuscitation team a given. If it is her kid, then she strikes me as a selfish or ignorant fool based on that fact alone.
posted by docpops at 1:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [22 favorites]


ericb, I am referring to national cultural differences. My husband is from the western slope of Colorado, for instance, and people see certain things way differently out there. As for Alaska, I'm thinking they have not fallen into the overmedicalization of birth a la the private New York hospital type. Perhaps some Alaskan mefites could weigh in here?

(I would never call Alaskans or rural Coloradoans hicks. That is insulting and ridiculous. I have a lot of respect for people who live in areas known for rugged independence-which these areas certainly are.)
posted by konolia at 1:22 PM on August 31, 2008


I am amazed at the amount of energy and negative judgment directed at someone based on the flimsiest of speculation and rumor. Such speculation and rumor from the "other side" would be shouted down as racism, sexism, grabbing at straws, desperation, and/or anti-Democrat conspiracy.

Oh, wait, I'm not amazed. Sorry to interrupt.
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 1:23 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Docpops, maybe you should ask her doctor that question. I think he is the only one qualified to tell us if she was being an ignoramus or simply following doctors orders.
posted by konolia at 1:25 PM on August 31, 2008


Palin lied about opposition to "Bridge to Nowhere"
Anchorage Daily News:
"When John McCain introduced Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate Friday, her reputation as a tough-minded budget-cutter was front and center.

'I told Congress, thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere,' Palin told the cheering McCain crowd, referring to Ketchikan's Gravina Island bridge.

But Palin was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.

The Alaska governor campaigned in 2006 on a build-the-bridge platform, telling Ketchikan residents she felt their pain when politicians called them 'nowhere.' They're still feeling pain today in Ketchikan, over Palin's subsequent decision to use the bridge funds for other projects -- and over the timing of her announcement, which they say came in a pre-dawn press release that seemed aimed at national news deadlines."
posted by ericb at 1:33 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


For those of you who have never had a baby, you can be in early labor with mild contractions that are NOT painful for a long time. Even a day or two. Even when a child is not one's first. Also, when one has had more than one baby you do contract on and off for hours even weeks before you give birth. She might have simply assumed she had leakage plus Braxton Hicks contractions.
posted by konolia at 1:33 PM on August 31, 2008


McCain and Graham Repeat False Claim That Palin Opposed The ‘Bridge To Nowhere’.
posted by ericb at 1:34 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


OK, so from the Anchorage newspaper story linked from the blog post in ericb's quote off Daily Kos:
Palin kept in close contact with Baldwin-Johnson. The contractions slowed to one or two an hour, "which is not active labor," the doctor said.

"I am not a glutton for pain and punishment. I would have never wanted to travel had I been fully engaged in labor," Palin said. After four kids, the governor said, she knew what labor felt like, and she wasn't in labor.They landed in Anchorage around 10:30 p.m. Thursday and an hour later were at the Mat-Su Regional Medical Center in Wasilla.

Baldwin-Johnson said she had to induce labor, and the baby didn't come until 6:30 a.m. Friday.
So Palin made a judgement call in consultation with her doctor, confident that she was the best placed to determine what was going on with her body, and if the above is accurate, turned out to be right. She had a slow leak. She wasn't in labour, and in fact had to have an induction that resulted in a live birth 22 hours later - well within the 24 hour advisory window for antibiotics if labour doesn't kick off.

Again, I'm hot on this issue because I hate the fact that we live in a climate where pregnant women are treated as children unable to make intelligent decisions about what's best for themselves and their bodies. (Unlike konolia, I am staunchly pro-choice, of course.) Palin's judgement here seems sound, particularly given that she'd had experience of doing this three times before. Her birth choices should not be used as a yardstick for her validity as a VP. Which sucks, as it happens.
posted by DarlingBri at 1:39 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I think he is the only one qualified to tell us if she was being an ignoramus or simply following doctors orders.
posted by konolia at 1:25 PM on August 31 [+] [!]


No, I suspect he would defend his decision. That doesn't make it any less open to questioning. If you Google this topic there are plenty of OB's and nurses weighing in saying the exact same thing I am - it's not inflammatory at all. She already stated her membranes were ruptured, so what I'm expected to believe is that the physician for the Governor of Alaska said, hey, don't even bother getting a check at a local hospital to see if you're showing evidence of early labor, don't get a a shot of ancef for infection prophylaxis, or a monitor strip to see if you might have cord issues or decels, just get on the plane. Because shit, we're Alaskans, we don't go for that hifalutin NewYorker over-medicated OB bullshit.

Seriously?
posted by docpops at 1:39 PM on August 31, 2008 [16 favorites]


I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.

Seriously, what are we supposed to do about someone that stupid? That's like me saying, hey, McCain fans, watch out, a kid at the record store today told me he wasn't voting for "that Nazi McCain".
posted by Bookhouse at 1:41 PM on August 31, 2008 [16 favorites]


And I think the rumor that this woman hid her daughter's pregnancy by pretending to be pregnant is about the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my entire life.

Oh, I don't know. I think stupider things about Palin have been said, in this thread in particular. Although I agree it should be neither here nor there. I personally don't care if she did cover up her daugher's pregnancy, birthed the child herself, or found it floating down the river in a basket. Nor do I want to see the possibility discussed with any amount of seriousness.

What bugs me is twofold: Democrats perceiving this desperate gamble as some sort of masterful play that we're just not fully understanding, and Republicans trying to tout this person as being fit for leadership or having anything in common with "Joe Sixpack".

"She'll catch up"? What the hell kind of response is that? This is what you say when you're seriously undermanned at work, and you need to hire someone, anyone at all, and pick the closest available warm body. I don't want the VP to "catch up" and learn about the world 'n' stuff, highlighting her Cliff Note's version of foreign policy into the wee hours of the night. I want a VP who already has their act together. And a person who's spent her political carreer in command of a few thousand people in a state dripping with oil revenues doesn't strike me as necessarily skilled. You would actually have to go out of your way to mess that up - all you really need to do is sit tight and sign checks.

And I'm getting really tired of Republicans claiming a copyright on what "the average American" is all about. And not just because it's cheap true Scotsman horseshit. Have you people been in a coma for the past four years? Do you know how hugely unpopular the president is? The results of the 2006 Congressional elections?

My Lord, the hoops that are jumped through to dress this candidate pick up as anything other than McCain leaning over a craps table, sleeves rolled up, shirt drenched in pit sweat, his last 20 bucks in his hand and throwing the dice is ceaselessly entertaining.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 1:46 PM on August 31, 2008 [26 favorites]


And I think the rumor that this woman hid her daughter's pregnancy by pretending to be pregnant is about the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my entire life.

But konolia, it isn't stupid at all, and the available evidence strongly supports it. It's just that in the world of conservatives, human frailty as it pertains to sexuality or is in direct conflict with the teachings of Jesus, has to be suppressed. It's the difference between Barney Frank and Larry Craig. As much as a part of me delights in the insane hypocrisy of these idiots being exposed, it's mostly just fucking sad. Someday in a perfect world all those Gideon bibles in no-tell motels all over the world will be rendered and reprinted with one thing only in the front - "Let your freak flag fly"
posted by docpops at 1:56 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


John McCain rolls the dice.
posted by birdherder at 1:58 PM on August 31, 2008


And if this election and the last eight years didn't literally have a direct impact on the possible future of the planet, I'd tend to agree with the comments that this is a stupid place to be dwelling. Alas, it is not so. Thus there is no detail too sordid, personal, or insipid that I wouldn't be happy to elevate to statuary proportions if it keeps the right-wing out of office. Feel free to disagree.
posted by docpops at 2:00 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


This is what you say when you're seriously undermanned at work, and you need to hire someone, anyone at all, and pick the closest available warm body.

We've had eight years of the cronyist Bush administration putting friends in leadership roles, people who had to "catch up", because they were too incompetent to do the heckuva job they were tasked to do.

This country doesn't really have much more time to give to inexperienced hacks like Palin who need to "catch up" to do the job.

So long as the Obama campaign focuses on Palin's complete lack of experience, and puts it in the context of what happened with Michael "Heckuva Job Brownie" Brown of FEMA during Hurricane Katrina — which could be done as early as tomorrow, given Hurricane Gustav — I'm hopeful we don't need to worry about the misogynist, fundamentalist Republican Party getting another four years to pillage the country, Konolia and friends notwithstanding.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 2:04 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


re: bookhouse's inquiry about McCain's adopted daughter's absence/presence in family photos:

Here's at least one.
posted by skyper at 2:08 PM on August 31, 2008


No, I suspect he would defend his decision. That doesn't make it any less open to questioning.

docpops, for one thing the doctor's a she. :) For another, I respect your experience, but doctors (not to mention midwives) disagree all the time about stuff like this and seem to get especially het up about labor decisions. Calling the woman a "selfish and ignorant fool" for, along with her doctor, making a different decision than you would have advised seems to be going a bit far.

ericb, the Kos blog post that keeps getting tossed around is just uninformed. All the alarmist talk about needing special care for a baby born "a month premature," for one thing. 37 weeks is considered full-term, and Palin was at 36.

I was going to highlight the same quote DarlingBri did, above. Some might see her decision as foolhardy, others as determined or courageous. Blah blah blah. She's a very fit woman who made an unusual choice based on factors that she was in the best position to judge. Turned out she was right (the baby had to be induced after all); extrapolating some kind of job-disqualifying character flaw from all this just comes off as silly.
posted by torticat at 2:15 PM on August 31, 2008


you are really uninformed if you think a mom has to see a doc in a hospital in order to have a baby. having a baby not not be a walk in the park, but it's as natural as taking a piss. it can even happen on a plane! and mothers who have had a few sorta know their own bodies and how things will generally go.
and I thought the Obama is a Muslim folks were deranged and desperate... dear God thisis depressing.
posted by dawson at 2:21 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


may not,and so forth.
posted by dawson at 2:23 PM on August 31, 2008


Why does the hospital where Trig was born not have him listed on the birth calendar? Link
(look fast, may disappear soon)

(I know: Hurf durf, tinfoil hat, but is that not sort of weird?)
posted by lord_wolf at 2:24 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


This thread has gotten stupid.
posted by dirigibleman at 2:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


having a baby ... (is) as natural as taking a piss.

Funny, I can't think of a single person or newborn baby that has either died or been grievously injured as a result of complications or infection following an otherwise successful session of vigorous urination.

I mean, unless someone out there has drowned or something ...
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 2:29 PM on August 31, 2008


But konolia, it isn't stupid at all, and the available evidence strongly supports it. It's just that in the world of conservatives, human frailty as it pertains to sexuality or is in direct conflict with the teachings of Jesus, has to be suppressed

Docpops, maybe you didn't remember that my grandchild was conceived before my daughter's marriage when she was 19. I know all about human frailty.

We might not believe in premarital sex, but we don't treat any resulting children as a punishment or as "omg the worst thing that ever happened to me!" My grandchild is probably the best thing that ever happened to my daughter.

Do you know what the Bible considers judgement in the area of sexuality? Barrenness.

The fact that this ridiculous story re the parentage of this baby has any legs at all makes me wonder if I just need to go and buy stock in tinfoil.
posted by konolia at 2:33 PM on August 31, 2008


Why does the hospital where Trig was born not have him listed on the birth calendar? Link
(look fast, may disappear soon)

(I know: Hurf durf, tinfoil hat, but is that not sort of weird?)


No, I would expect that, since mom is the Governor of the state. I would expect that a parent might have to give permission to have their child listed, or barring that, that a seated governor might ask for privacy in general, being a public figure?
posted by konolia at 2:35 PM on August 31, 2008


extrapolating some kind of job-disqualifying character flaw from all this just comes off as silly.

Coming off eight years of recklessness from the current administration, it doesn't seem far fetched that people would question seeming recklessness in a candidate for national office, even if it is just the vice-president.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 2:43 PM on August 31, 2008


There's another possibility: that Sarah Palin IS the mother, and took dramatic risks with the labor because she was hoping for a miscarriage, for God to make the choice that she couldn't, whether for ideological, moral or political reasons.
posted by msalt at 2:44 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


You heard it here first!
Joe Biden might have had a pet goat as a child that was possibly malnourished!
Unfit,unfit!
posted by dawson at 2:45 PM on August 31, 2008


Why does the hospital where Trig was born not have him listed on the birth calendar?

Because those entries are linked to photos? And the baby has Downs? And making that particular newborn photo available when you're the Governor means it will appear on the front page of the paper the next morning? And almost any parent's knee-jerk reaction would be to protect their hours-old child from that kind of gawping?
posted by DarlingBri at 2:46 PM on August 31, 2008


And almost any parent's knee-jerk reaction would be to protect their hours-old child from that kind of gawping?

That is really doubtful given that it's a normal, super adorable looking baby.

konolia: " I think the rumor that this woman hid her daughter's pregnancy by pretending to be pregnant is about the stupidest thing I have ever heard..."

docpops: "... it isn't stupid at all, and the available evidence strongly supports it"

***HEAD ASPLODES***

God, this thread has gotten very, very stupid.

I'm done here.
posted by dgaicun at 3:00 PM on August 31, 2008


DarlingBri, they put the baby on TV within hours of his birth.
posted by essexjan at 3:02 PM on August 31, 2008


...someone mentioned up thread that Down Syndrom is very rare in babies born to teen mothers, and it's much more common in women who have children later in life.
"80% of the cases of Down's Syndrome are in mother's under the age of 35."


ericb: I'm disappointed in you, I saw that stat in the dailykos diary but I didn't bother to refute it because it was so stupid. The chances of a baby being born with down syndrome are higher for older women, but younger women have far more babies. If a 44 year old woman and a teenager are both having regular unprotected sex and a baby is produced with downs Syndrome, then it's likely to have come from the 44 year old woman. And in this case we know Sarah Palin was having unprotected sex and had already had four children, we don't know if her daughter was at all.

And like Flunkie pointed out, it's not about a generic "under 35" and "over 35" it's about a 16 year old vs. a 44 year old. look at this chart. A 44 year old woman has a 1/41 probability of having a child with downs syndrome. A 32 year old has a 1/725 chance. And that's as low as the chart goes. According to this article the odds of a 25 year old having a child with Downs is less then 1/1,300, the data comes from.

So to review:
odds of Sara Palin having a child with downs syndrom at her age:
1/41
The odds of a 16 year old having a child with Down's Syndrome:
less then 1/1,300
Frankly, this "Teen daughter conspiracy" is as bullshit as the "Obama is a muslim" slurs, with the added bonus of being completely scientifically illiterate.
In fact, were I on a hiring committee, I would strongly advise against hiring a person who had done something such as what she is alleged to have done --lord_wolf
Ugh, you're kidding right? It's illegal to take pregnancy and reproductive choices into consideration when hiring!! My guess is you've never been anywhere near a hiring committee. If you did that, the woman could sue your company into the ground.

Man, all this speculation about her Uterus reminds of the scene from Anchorman where the guys in the office are talking about the new female anchor and they start talking about her periods might attract bears which could "put the whole station in danger!" It's really freaking ridiculous and embarrassing.
But konolia, it isn't stupid at all, and the available evidence strongly supports it. --docprops
No, all the real scientific evidence, taken over decades, shows that teenagers hardly ever give birth to kids with Downs Syndrome, and that women in their 40s often do. Anyone who could believe this rumor would be a complete scientific illiterate, and that includes you, if you seriously believe it's possible.
posted by delmoi at 3:06 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Do you know what the Bible ....

The fact that this ridiculous story re the parentage of this baby has any legs at all makes me wonder if I just need to go and buy stock in tinfoil.


Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
posted by cashman at 3:06 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Actually I see Obama as more global. Think about it...That's not a slam at him, that's actually a feature, and a strong point. But it doesn't help him relate to Joe Sixpack.

I happen to believe that Barack Obama would have no trouble at all relating to Joe Sixpack. It's more likely that Joe Sixpack isn't taking a lot of trouble to relate to him. He doesn't speak in soundbites, after all.
posted by brain cloud at 3:14 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


The fact that this ridiculous story re the parentage of this baby has any legs at all makes me wonder if I just need to go and buy stock in tinfoil.

Et tu, Christianity.
posted by Sparx at 3:15 PM on August 31, 2008


How embarrassing this thread has become.
posted by Sailormom at 3:18 PM on August 31, 2008


Do you know what the Bible considers judgement in the area of sexuality? Barrenness.

Wait, barren women are sinners who are being punished? Or is this a good judgment, "God's saving you for other things" kind of a deal?
posted by Lentrohamsanin at 3:19 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


There's another possibility: that Sarah Palin IS the mother, and took dramatic risks with the labor because she was hoping for a miscarriage, for God to make the choice that she couldn't, whether for ideological, moral or political reasons.

You are not the first to float the idea. Pretty distasteful speculation. A 36-week-old fetus isn't, you know, some little clot you can pass in the airplane toilet. But I guess in this scenario she'd braced herself for the horrific reality of giving birth on a plane followed by the baby's death. Because deep in in her heart that was the outcome she wanted.

Leaving that alone, a good segment of the discussion here has been about the (irresponsible! reprehensible! immoral!) choice Palin made in taking that flight. Suppose through some series of events the baby had died because of that decision--you know, Palin's dream of God's taking the child come true. She wouldn't exactly have come up smelling of roses, right? The positive outcome of her controversial decision pretty much depended on the child coming out okay.

Sigh. Palin's baby is really her daughter's. Palin wanted the baby to die and tried to help God pull the trigger. Such stupid, insulting, irrelevant speculation.
posted by torticat at 3:23 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


DarlingBri, did you click the link from my "Trig was born" phrase? It's an article from an April 18 Anchorage paper -- and it prominently features a photo of the newborn. That makes it part of the public record...yet, months later, the hospital's website just happens not to list what should be a particularly famous birth on its birth calendar?

Also, I, along with some others who are looking, are having trouble determining whether Mat-Su regional has a NICU. That's another weight on the something's going on side of the "what's up with this?" scale.

My guess is you've never been anywhere near a hiring committee.

I haven't; and not only that, it's very probably the case that I'm a complete idiot. However, is it also the case that if, for example, I know a woman who was a prospective employee drank heavily during her pregnancy, I'm not allowed to take that into consideration in my hiring decisions? I'm really curious about that.

I'm trying not to come down on the side of holding pregnant women as sacred chalices who must behave in a rigidly scrpited manner, as DarlinBri and others have pointed out there's a danger of doing in this discussion. But on the other hand, the only reason I feel even the least bit able to view flying while leaking amnio fluid @ 36 weeks dimly is because my wife and other women who have given birth have told me that it's an incredibly poor call to do something like that.
posted by lord_wolf at 3:23 PM on August 31, 2008


Quite a few women in the Bible were barren until giving birth to children uniquely gifted by God or with special purpose- Hannah (mom to Samuel), Samson's mom, and Elizabeth (mom of John the Baptist.) There are plenty more.



If you do read in some sections of the OT it mentions barrenness as a result of curses as a result of sin, but by no means was all barrenness a sign of God's disfavor-although in general people treated barren women that way. Fecundity, otoh was always, ALWAYS seen as a blessing.
posted by konolia at 3:27 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


delmoi, I agree with your larger points, but as to this:
And in this case we know Sarah Palin was having unprotected sex

what the FUCK? You have a cite?
posted by torticat at 3:30 PM on August 31, 2008


No, all the real scientific evidence, taken over decades, shows that teenagers hardly ever give birth to kids with Downs Syndrome, and that women in their 40s often do. Anyone who could believe this rumor would be a complete scientific illiterate, and that includes you, if you seriously believe it's possible.

Right - so in Delmoi's version of science, it is impossible (or impossible to seriously believe ) that a younger woman could have a child with Downs

Just. So. Wrong.

There's a one in 1125 chance for a woman at 25 to to have an afflicted child. As stats go about 80 percent of babies with Down syndrome are born to women who are under age 35, as younger women have far more babies.

How do you spell syentifikkally illitterat again?
posted by Sparx at 3:33 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Maureen Dowd | NYTimes:
"Enthusiastic Republicans don’t see the choice of Palin as affirmative action, despite her thin résumé and gaping absence of foreign policy knowledge, because they expect Republicans to put an underqualified 'babe,' as Rush Limbaugh calls her, on the ticket. They have a tradition of nominating fun, bantamweight cheerleaders from the West, like the previous Miss Congeniality types Dan Quayle and W., and then letting them learn on the job. So they crash into the globe a few times while they’re learning to drive, what’s the big deal?

....The legacy of Geraldine Ferraro was supposed to be that no one would ever go on a blind date with history again. But that crazy maverick and gambler McCain does it, and conservatives and evangelicals rally around him in admiration of his refreshingly cynical choice of Sarah, an evangelical Protestant and anti-abortion crusader who became a hero when she decided to have her baby, who has Down syndrome, and when she urged schools to debate creationism as well as that stuffy old evolution thing.

Palinistas, as they are called, love Sarah’s spunky, relentlessly quirky 'Northern Exposure' story from being a Miss Alaska runner-up, and winning Miss Congeniality, to being mayor and hockey mom in Wasilla, a rural Alaskan town of 6,715, to being governor for two years to being the first woman ever to run on a national Republican ticket. (Why do men only pick women as running mates when they need a Hail Mary pass? It’s a little insulting.)"
posted by ericb at 3:36 PM on August 31, 2008


Do you know what the Bible considers judgement in the area of sexuality? Barrenness.

WTF, konolia, that's just hateful.

Hey, but now I know why I have to have fertility treatments! It's my long and storied history as a gin slut.
posted by sugarfish at 3:38 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Because those entries are linked to photos?

Interestingly enough, he's not listed by name either. This doesn't mean the rumor is true, of course, but it's another little hole that gives people room speculate.

It's kinda like watching the 9/11 nutjobs spin theories.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 3:39 PM on August 31, 2008


Right - so in Delmoi's version of science, it is impossible (or impossible to seriously believe ) that a younger woman could have a child with Downs

It's not impossible, I never said it was impossible I said it was extremely unlikely, which it is, since it is extremely unlikely, and I've got no problem saying it's impossible that scientifically literate person could seriously believe it.
And in this case we know Sarah Palin was having unprotected sex
what the FUCK? You have a cite?


Well, we know she's married and pops out kids every couple of years. How else would that have happened?
posted by delmoi at 3:41 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


"'She's not qualified, she doesn't have the judgment, to be next in line to the president of the United States,'' Larry Persily, who until June worked in the governor's Washington office as a congressional liaison, said in a phone interview yesterday.

A supporter of Palin's campaign for governor, Jim Whitaker, the Republican mayor of Fairbanks, also questioned Palin's readiness to serve as vice president in a phone interview yesterday.

Whitaker said that while he is 'still an avid supporter'' of Palin as governor, he will continue to back Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama." *
posted by ericb at 3:42 PM on August 31, 2008


THIS THREAD CONTINUES TO BE STUPID.

Here, let me try jiggling the handle...
posted by dirigibleman at 3:43 PM on August 31, 2008 [5 favorites]


is there some kind of virus in this page that turns people into barking moonbats?
posted by pyramid termite at 3:45 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Konolia: Hate to tell you guys this but putting her on the ticket has electrified the Republicans and church folk here. I mean, they are stoked.
I am interested in how they react to the fact that she is a woman, with five children, and such a busy job. In my experience, fundamentalist christian mothers of large families are often stay at home moms and have traditional views of families. So, I was surprised by this quote: "To any critics who say a woman can't think and work and carry a baby at the same time, I'd just like to escort that Neanderthal back to the cave," Palin said.

Do you think Palin could be empowering to christian women? Do people talk about these issues at your church?
posted by davar at 3:49 PM on August 31, 2008


Barack Obama (during tonight's 60 Minutes interview):
"Well, I don't know Governor Palin, I have not met her before. I had a brief conversation with her after she was selected to congratulate her and wish her luck - but, not too much luck! - on the campaign trail. And she seems to have a compelling life story. Obviously, she's a fine mother and a up-and-coming public servant. So, it's too early for me to gauge what kind of running mate she'll be. My sense is that she subscribes to John McCain's agenda. And ultimately, this [election] is going to be about where I want to take the country and where Joe Biden wants to take the country, and where John McCain and his running mate want to take the country."
posted by ericb at 3:50 PM on August 31, 2008


Well, here we go: Sully drops the rumor bomb.

Despite my love of salacious rumors of all stripes, this seems a bad move.
posted by Bookhouse at 3:53 PM on August 31, 2008


No Experience Necessary: How Sarah Palin made the GOP change its mind about presidential qualifications.
posted by homunculus at 3:56 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


lord_wolf, the photo show there is about a million times better than anything that ever came out of those horrendous "freshly baked baby" hospital nursery photos. It also appears to have been pulled from TV footage, which is about where you'd pitch a birth if you were a sitting Governor.

I have no idea what the real story is but I'm just sayin'... she is not your average Alaskan mom and this is not your average baby and I'm not surprised this birth was handled a little differently.

toricat, there have been many mentions of Palin not supporting birth control even for married couples. I can't find an actual cite or source for that but it's been much-repeated. According to Time however she does support birth control - their basis for this is that she's a member of FFL. Except FFL doesn't have a position on contraception, only on abortion, so that doesn't mean anything either.
posted by DarlingBri at 3:57 PM on August 31, 2008


konolia, leaving all the rest of this mess aside for a moment, I have two questions for you -- and I am asking in the genuine spirit of "I'm currious" since you're a demographic I don't have much contact with in my real life:

1) If George Bush were eligible to run for a third term, would you vote for him?

2) If Gov Palin's resume and life story were the same, but she was vocally pro-choice (in the same way that, say, Senators Snowe and Collins are -- they don't run on that point, but if asked they'll tell you point blank what their stance is), would you still feel she was a good candidate for VP?
posted by anastasiav at 3:59 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


msalt: There's another possibility: that Sarah Palin IS the mother, and took dramatic risks with the labor because she was hoping for a miscarriage
Like torticat I think this response is really, really awful and I am shocked that it comes up more than once in this discussion, and that the first time it came up six people favorited it. I wonder if the pro-choice insistence that "it is not a baby if it is in the womb, it is just tissue, just a potential baby, etc." makes some people forget that at 36 weeks a baby is about ready to be born? You cannot get a miscarriage anymore at that point. (Actually if your are more than 20 weeks pregnant and your baby dies it is called a stillbirth, not a miscarriage). Of course the baby can die during labor, but we are talking about a baby at that point. Are you really saying that Sarah Palin tried to kill her baby?
posted by davar at 4:17 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Well, we know she's married and pops out kids every couple of years. How else would that have happened?

Contraceptive failure? They had three children in four years and then two more over the next 14. They don't believe abortion is an option. Connect the dots.

Not that we should be engaging in this discussion. :) I just thought that was an astounding statement you made, so matter-of-factly.
posted by torticat at 4:18 PM on August 31, 2008


1) If George Bush were eligible to run for a third term, would you vote for him?

2) If Gov Palin's resume and life story were the same, but she was vocally pro-choice (in the same way that, say, Senators Snowe and Collins are -- they don't run on that point, but if asked they'll tell you point blank what their stance is), would you still feel she was a good candidate for VP?


1) I still like George.
My son just graduated from USAFA, and Bush was there, saluting and shaking hands with every grad. My son said to him, "Sir, your approval rating is high with me!" You can see on the DVD (yes, I have one) where Bush pulls him back and says something to him. What he said was this:
"Approval ratings are not important. What is important is doing the right thing."
I want to vote for people who are interested in doing the right thing, not the popular thing.

If Obama gets elected, it will be interesting to me what he says and does as soon as he gets all the security briefings that a seated President gets.

2) Abortion is my litmus test. If you don't pass that with me, I won't bother to look at anything else, period.
posted by konolia at 4:28 PM on August 31, 2008


Stop it stop it stop it stop it stop it with the baby rumors! There are SO many other issues we can pursue without resorting to this kind of base speculation. It's shooting fish in a barrel, with bazooka - no with TWO bazookas. There is a glut of cons for every pro. This tabloid crap is like school on Sunday: no class.

Thus there is no detail too sordid, personal, or insipid that I wouldn't be happy to elevate to statuary proportions if it keeps the right-wing out of office.

So, "You are prepared to ... do anything which is likely to cause demoralization of the party?"

I'm glad you're motivated, but this kind of thing will always
come back to bite you.

The high road is a rare course. Obama is taking it, but you are judged by the company you keep. The supporters are a reflection on the candidate, like it or not. Can we criticize the other side spreading baseless rumors about Obama, and then stoop to this level ourselves?
posted by damo at 4:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [5 favorites]


If Obama gets elected, it will be interesting to me what he says and does as soon as he gets all the security briefings that a seated President gets.

"The hell? These things have like three inches of dust on them! Wasn't anybody even pretending to read them?"
posted by Lentrohamsanin at 4:32 PM on August 31, 2008 [24 favorites]


For those that asked-yes, my church supports woman caring for their own children at home but has also supported working moms, and has even employed them-yes, even some moms with small children. I know my own preference is for moms to be with their children, but even so, for a time I worked outside the home when mine were small (third shift, so I didn't use daycare.)

It is my understanding that Palin's husband is taking care of the kids...also, please remember that all but one of her children are school age.

There is a small subset of Christianity that right now is having a hissy fit that a woman has been nominated, but they just need to get over it.
posted by konolia at 4:35 PM on August 31, 2008


I want to vote for people who are interested in doing the right thing, not the popular thing.

So, how does that jibe with McCain selecting someone purely for the votes she is able to grab for him, rather than her political experience on the national stage?
posted by brain cloud at 4:38 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Republicans on the Sunday talk shows:
"[Former Republican Sen. Fred] Thompson [of Tennessee]: 'She's a mother of five children. ... And she has more experience than Barack Obama.'

Sen. Lindsay Graham of South Carolina: 'Governor Palin took on Ted Stevens. If she can take him on, she can take on the Russians.' Stevens, a Republican senator, is facing corruption charges and running for re-election.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty: 'Palin is commander-in-chief of the Alaskan National Guard.' The state's Guard has about 4,000 members."
posted by ericb at 4:39 PM on August 31, 2008


Jesus. This thread has been abducted by the aforementioned American Morons or their Republican sock puppet aparachiks.

Did Palin give birth to her sisters...er... daughters Down Syndrome baby or a was it a two headed goat?

WHO GIVES A SHIT.

Thank you MetaFilter for joining the ranks of the Average American Dipshit and perpetuating yet another bandwidth soaking derail.

There is only one relevant topic in regards to Sarah Polin and that is she in the much less qualified and infinitely more fundamentalist female equivalent of Dan Quayle. The republicans picked her because she is young, cute in a suit, and has a vagina. She is the Trophy Wife VP. And she will do what she is told. And she would be a heartbeat away from dropping bombs on the childen of the world. And trust me. The republicans WILL be dropping bombs on innocent children if McCain gets elected.

Women should be insulted at this VP choice.
posted by tkchrist at 4:39 PM on August 31, 2008 [6 favorites]


There is a small subset of Christianity that right now is having a hissy fit that a woman has been nominated, but they just need to get over it.
Why? 1 Timothy 2 seems pretty clear - women shouldn't be in positions of authority. They should be silent.

To be clear, I do not agree. But it's not clear to me why a Christian wouldn't.
posted by Flunkie at 4:41 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


So, how does that jibe with McCain selecting someone purely for the votes she is able to grab for him, rather than her political experience on the national stage?

Palin is the ONLY reason I am not holding my nose to vote this November.
posted by konolia at 4:43 PM on August 31, 2008


2) Abortion is my litmus test.

You disgust me. How hypocritical can you be.

George Bush aborted a whole bunch of babies in Iraq. Late term, too.
posted by tkchrist at 4:46 PM on August 31, 2008 [10 favorites]


Well, here we go: Sully drops the rumor bomb.

Ugh.

Contraceptive failure? They had three children in four years and then two more over the next 14. They don't believe abortion is an option. Connect the dots.

Not that we should be engaging in this discussion. :) I just thought that was an astounding statement you made, so matter-of-factly.


I suppose that's a good point. :P
posted by delmoi at 4:47 PM on August 31, 2008


tkchrist, I don't like konolia's views any more than you do but that's out of line. You can make a point without a personal attack. That sort of thing makes you look like a rabid rotty and konolia, one of MeFis few vocal conservatives, look like a set upon victim of gang violence.
posted by DarlingBri at 4:55 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


Here's a video of Palin giving a speech in March, which would be about 7 months into the pregnancy. Even though the shot only gets a partial side profile, and that she's wearing all black, she definitely seems quite a bit wider than she does today.
posted by gyc at 5:03 PM on August 31, 2008


It's just that in the world of conservatives, human frailty as it pertains to sexuality or is in direct conflict with the teachings of Jesus, has to be suppressed

Actually, conservatives would do well to adopt Jesus' forgiveness, compassion, and kindness instead of cherry-picking the harshest Old Testament passages and use them to justify hypocrisy, hatred, and bigotry like the Pharisees. They should dust off "judge not, that you be not judged." "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by men."

I want to vote for people who are interested in doing the right thing, not the popular thing.

Was lying us into invading Iraq the right thing? Was letting people drown in the streets of New Orleans?

Governor Palin took on Ted Stevens. If she can take him on, she can take on the Russians

Palin Ad Starring Ted Stevens Already Scrubbed From Palin's Campaign Website "Luckily, the ad featuring Stevens and Palin is still available for your viewing pleasure!"

Scandal-Plagued Ted Stevens Endorses Palin For VP
posted by kirkaracha at 5:04 PM on August 31, 2008 [5 favorites]


Forget the babby.

Sarah Palin thinks the Founding Fathers wrote the Pledge of Allegiance:
[Question on a candidate questionnaire by the Eagle Forum Alaska:] you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

Sarah Palin: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance
Forget the babby. This woman's a blockhead. Whatever you want to say about Hillary, Palin is no Hillary replacement.
posted by orthogonality at 5:04 PM on August 31, 2008 [16 favorites]


Palin is the ONLY reason I am not holding my nose to vote this November.

I can understand feeling strongly about an issue - passionately, even - but I can't understand a single issue being the sole determinant of how I vote in an election. I look at the whole package. I don't have to agree with a candidate 100%, but I like to be able to agree 75 or 80%.

That said, anybody who voted for Bush purely because of where he stood on the issue of abortion, need only check the yellow pages to see that abortion is still as legal as walking down the street. So what do these voters say now, when their mission wasn't accomplished?
posted by brain cloud at 5:06 PM on August 31, 2008


For the love of all things sacred in this world, I am begging you folks: please, please, please drop this horseshit conversation about Palin's pregnancy and what she may or may not have done. It has fuck-all to do with her ability (or gross lack thereof) to serve as VP of the US, it goes against every fucking tenet of the pro-choice movement, and it is just unseemly and unbefitting this site as imaginable.

Shred her for her lack of experience, for her obnoxiously aw-shucks pollyanna approach to one of the most important jobs in the world, have at it -- there are a million and one things she should be questioned for. Her reproductive and family choices aren't fare game, so fucking lay off already.
posted by shiu mai baby at 5:06 PM on August 31, 2008 [12 favorites]


Konolia, you mentioned that other members of your congregation are newly energized on the Palin pick. Can I assume these are single issue voters? If so, was John McCain insufficiently pro-life? And what about adding Palin to the ticket changes that?

Because I suspect the evangelicals have been planning on having their hissy fit over immigration and staying home. Now that it looks like they're gonna get brutalized, they'll take any excuse to mobilize.
posted by butterstick at 5:08 PM on August 31, 2008


Not just inexperienced, but staggeringly ignorant about our nations's history.

11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?
SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.


The rest of the questions reveal her as being unbelievably backwards, as well.
posted by empath at 5:08 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


* fair game, dangit, fair game. I should know better than to type while this annoyed.
posted by shiu mai baby at 5:08 PM on August 31, 2008


2) Abortion is my litmus test.

Conservative Christians collectively tried to eliminate welfare as the only real incentive to discourage abortions, and it was a very high priority for them, so they don't really believe in their cause. What it means to them personally is a way to persuade others that they care about someone else in their natural state of loathing towards all others (and also self-loathing). It really works in getting people to take them seriously.
posted by Brian B. at 5:08 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Flunkie, go google Deborah in the Bible.
Deborah was Old Testament. Timothy is New. A new and everlasting covenant.
posted by Flunkie at 5:10 PM on August 31, 2008


And you know what I would tell the most fundamentalist of my bretheren? If you want to complain about this woman in office, then look at yourselves in the mirror as you shirked your civic duty to be involved just like any other citizen in this great nation of ours...tons of you guys have decried the dirtiness of politics and washed your hands of it, declaring it was an unholy business.

Amen! Bring back the Catonsville Nine! I know, they're Catholics, but they took the Bible pretty literally when it comes to the sanctity of human life.

"Our apologies, good friends, for the fracture of good order, the burning of paper instead of children."
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:11 PM on August 31, 2008


The US under George Bush has aborted over 100,000 Iraqi's.

O RLY? I thought it was the extremists who came over the Iraqi border from Syria and Jordan who are murdering innocents over there. AT least that is what the soldier from church who comes to my house and eats at my table says. The soldier who has actually BEEN over there to see for himself.
posted by konolia at 5:12 PM on August 31, 2008


That said, anybody who voted for Bush purely because of where he stood on the issue of abortion, need only check the yellow pages to see that abortion is still as legal as walking down the street. So what do these voters say now, when their mission wasn't accomplished?

Excellent point. 8 years of Bush and no change. Abortion is still legal. Maybe you can make excuses about circumstances and intentions, but there it is.

The abortion issue is a carrot dangling from a stick.
posted by damo at 5:12 PM on August 31, 2008


Local Blogger's take:
Today, while I watched her hop out of the “Straight Talk Express” bus, and give the second reading of her acceptance speech, one of my fellow viewers said, “You know, I don’t remember her opposing the Bridge.” And it hit me. I don’t remember that either. A quick double-check with the third member of our watch party confirmed our confusion. We all live here. We all watch the news, read the paper, and pay attention to the local political circus, but none of us connected Sarah with her claims of rebuffing the controversial earmark.

...

Today, Palin called in to a local radio program, and bubbled, “This is so amazeen!” Then she said that her children and she had only learned of her selection the day before the announcement was made. I think of the extensive vetting process that the Democratic VP candidates went through. Evan Bayh said that he was grilled extensively about skeletons in the closet, and even whether any of his kids had a Facebook or MySpace page that might come back to haunt him.

...

But many Alaskans are just giddy over the whole thing. The local sportscaster, after reporting on the high school basketball scores, said, “You know Sarah Palin used to be a sportscaster….and she’s the Vice Presidential candidate. So, I think I wanna do that…yeah.” (eyeroll) And one woman who was interviewed said she was totally in support of Palin because, “This is really going to put Alaska on the map. Now people are going to find out what we’re really all about.”

Because this is what we’re looking for in the next Vice President. We want Alaska to be on the map. And not in that little box in the South Pacific you guys always stuff us in. This election is about Alaska’s road to legitimacy! Sar-ah Sar-ah Sar-ah! (banging head on desk and going to bed)


posted by delmoi at 5:12 PM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


Fecundity, otoh was always, ALWAYS seen as a blessing.

and only now, thousands of years later, reading the comments of the common mefite, does one come to understand how that may have been an overly optimistic interpretation.
posted by quonsar at 5:15 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


I can understand feeling strongly about an issue - passionately, even - but I can't understand a single issue being the sole determinant of how I vote in an election.

Seriously? What if one party was in favor of genocide? That's how anti-choice activists look at it. So they are right to be one-issue voters*. If one party was in favor of reinstating slavery.

actually, that's a mild way of putting it. I've never understood why people call people who bomb abortion clinics "hypocrites." Dude, if there was a baby-murdering farm down the street, it would be immoral not to bomb it. But that's a huge derail on an already monster thread.
posted by Bookhouse at 5:15 PM on August 31, 2008


[konolia, tkchrist, please continue this argument in metatalk or over email, it's turning into a circle-jerk in an already contentious thread. thank you.]
posted by jessamyn at 5:21 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I thought it was the extremists who came over the Iraqi border from Syria and Jordan who are murdering innocents over there. AT least that is what the soldier from church who comes to my house and eats at my table says. The soldier who has actually BEEN over there to see for himself.

Think again.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


O RLY? I thought it was the extremists who came over the Iraqi border from Syria and Jordan who are murdering innocents over there. AT least that is what the soldier from church who comes to my house and eats at my table says. The soldier who has actually BEEN over there to see for himself.

Syrian terrorists are dropping bombs on Iraqi villages?

When your friend who personally watched 100,000 Iraqis get killed comes over next time could you ask why he hasn't told the authorities about their secret air force?
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 5:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [5 favorites]


God is the one that sets up leaders.
Mugabe?
Kim Jung Il?
al-Bashir?

(I'm trying desperately not to Godwin this thread)
posted by damo at 5:23 PM on August 31, 2008


I'll stop pre-emptively now. Sorry for the de-rail.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 5:24 PM on August 31, 2008


O RLY? I thought it was the extremists who came over the Iraqi border from Syria and Jordan who are murdering innocents over there. AT least that is what the soldier from church who comes to my house and eats at my table says. The soldier who has actually BEEN over there to see for himself.

You really believe that? I mean, how would he be able to tell where the people shooting at him and dropping IEDs actually came from? And furthermore, it's contrary to the reports of other people, who had also been there.

(It's kind of a derail, but at this point the thread is 1,300 comments long, and it's been all over the map. I think we need to figure out a way to work fat people into it. Palin is very athletic, could that be a turnoff for fat people? There was an article a while back where a reporter speculated that Obama was too fit to relate to the 'average American')
posted by delmoi at 5:24 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


and I've got no problem saying it's impossible that scientifically literate person could seriously believe it.

There's a one in 1500 chance for a woman at 20 to to have an afflicted child.

Alaskan 15-19 year olds: 50,094

Female population of Alaska: 48.3% = 24195 15-19 year old girls (this is obviously approx as it is not age sorted)

Teen Pregnancy Rates per 1,000 Girls Aged 15-19, 2000ad: 73

73x24.195=1766 pregant girls

1766/1500 =1.177 = number of children born with Down's in that age group in a year

So there's (approx) more than one child born with Down's in Alaska every year. At what point does the chance of less than 1 in 1500 become scientifically impossible to believe of a given family?
posted by Sparx at 5:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


konolia, thanks for your reply. Again, like some here I'm not looking to mock but just to understand.

Palin says here that she opposes "explicit" (and I'm not sure what that means) sex-ed programs in schools. Do you agree with her? Do you (and I am sort of asking for you to speak for the members of your church here, sorry) feel like not teaching kids about what sex is, how it works, and how you avoid getting pregnant -- even if presented along side an program to strongly encourage abstinence -- is the right way to go to reduce the number of abortions in the US? (Because I'm pretty sure you'll agree with me that making abortion illegal doesn't mean that people will stop having them, and I think your ultimate goal (as is mine, although I'm pro-choice) is to stop people from having abortions.

Palin is also on record as saying that if her daughter were raped and became pregnant as a result of that rape, she would -- I think the wording she used was "not allow" although I can't find the cite right now -- not support her daughter ending the pregnancy? Do you agree or disagree? (Also -- incest? life of the mother?)

Final question: (and if I'm being a pest feel free to Mefi mail me and tell me to knock it off, I understand that I'm sort of asking you to be exposed to some assholes here) Are you for or against the death penalty? If you're for it, how to you reconcile the two views?
posted by anastasiav at 5:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


1 Timothy 2 seems pretty clear - women shouldn't be in positions of authority. They should be silent.

...said paul, writing to a 1st century church in a pastoral letter, so called because they deal with the qualifications and duties of pastors. nice try, but no cigar. if you are going to quote the bible it would serve you well to equip yourself with even a TINY modicum of knowing WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
posted by quonsar at 5:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Andrew Sullivan is on the fake pregnancy story now. It's got legs. She's going to have to answer questions on it or drop out, I think.
posted by empath at 5:30 PM on August 31, 2008


Andrew Sullivan is on the fake pregnancy story now. It's got legs. She's going to have to answer questions on it or drop out, I think.

God I hope not. Of course the MSM is utterly depraved and would love to harp on this, but on the other hand they are also somewhat deferential to people in power. I'd much rather see them cover the Troopergate issues.
posted by delmoi at 5:38 PM on August 31, 2008


Excellent point. 8 years of Bush and no change. Abortion is still legal.

I'm sorry, have you been paying attention for the last 8 years? No change?

Abortion rights are under unprecedented attack in the US. 87% of US counties do not have an abortion provider – 97% in non-metropolitan areas, and 1 in 4 women has to travel 50 miles or more to obtain an abortion. If you're under 18, this travel can mean crossing four state lines, often illegally, due to the relatively recent prevalence of parental consent laws.

Bush and his right wing buddies have been alarmingly successful in the bid against abortion. It doesn't matter if it's legal if there's nobody to provide it and nobody can access it anyway.

For some of us, this election is all about abortion rights. This issue has never been more critical. The next president will nominate at least one Supreme Court justice, and the margin on Wade has never been narrower.
posted by DarlingBri at 5:40 PM on August 31, 2008 [10 favorites]


You know I had this room mate once who was a Tolkien Scholar. I guess he and a couple other guys were the shit as far as Hobbits and Elves were concerned. Occasionally I would wake up at 3am to heated screaming argument from the living room and these "scholars" would be arguing about the interpretation of Dwarf song. A fully annotated leather bound version of the Silmarillion would get tossed across the room and break a beer bottle on the mantle.

It's a work of fiction, people.

People fighting over bible verses are exactly as ridiculous.
posted by tkchrist at 5:40 PM on August 31, 2008 [7 favorites]


At what point does the chance of less than 1 in 1500 become scientifically impossible to believe of a given family?

Sorry - that was wrongly worded. ...become scientifically improbable enough to dismiss. A one in 1500 chance is pretty likely to happen given sufficient opportunities. CF lotteries. I think your pleas to science are miscalled.
posted by Sparx at 5:40 PM on August 31, 2008


Andrew Sullivan is on the fake pregnancy story now. It's got legs. She's going to have to answer questions on it or drop out, I think.

Brilliant news! The Republicans choose a VP candidate whose only value to them is that she brings the abortion debate onto the news agenda, and so skilled Democrat internet detectives decide to neutralise this threat by ensuring that the abortion debate will remain central to the news agenda for weeks. Great work, everybody.

Now, if only you can maybe out one of those gay friends she's got as well, then you can let the Republicans talk about how the Dems support gay marriage too, while making yourselves look like assholes in the process. Yeah, that would pretty much put the election in the bag.
posted by flashboy at 5:46 PM on August 31, 2008 [7 favorites]


It's not going to be "internet detectives" that get the story out there, it'll likely be the National Enquirer. There's no way they aren't already all over this story. I bet they have people in AK right now interviewing classmates and hospital staff.
posted by empath at 5:50 PM on August 31, 2008


Brilliant news! The Republicans choose a VP candidate whose only value to them is that she brings the abortion debate onto the news agenda, and so skilled Democrat internet detectives decide to neutralise this threat by ensuring that the abortion debate will remain central to the news agenda for weeks. Great work, everybody.

I totally agree. Progressives are miserable and keeping to their own strategic talking points. The perils of free thinking.

Now, if only you can maybe out one of those gay friends she's got as well, then you can let the Republicans talk about how the Dems support gay marriage too, while making yourselves look like assholes in the process. Yeah, that would pretty much put the election in the bag.

Bro, they're gonna do that anyway. It's a forgone conclusion. Teh Gay Marriage and Abortion (which they will never outlaw because it's simply too useful an issue) are all they got. That is the one two punch of a desperate GOP hoping to cultivate a whole new crop of American Morons. And it works.

Terror won't work as well because it opens up Iraq as a topic. Unless there is a new attack. And even that might backfire because the dems could JUST as easily say "See. We told you we weren't safer."
posted by tkchrist at 5:54 PM on August 31, 2008


DarlingBri Well I guess "no change" was a bit of an overstatement. The point is that sustained attack and small results (each of which can be lauded) over a long time is what is desired. To win a total ban on abortion is to obviate, for the Republicans, the easiest and most profitable avenue for scooping up votes. They don't want to "win" they want to "be winning" for as long as possible, carrying the vote and (surprise) doing a bit of non-abortion-related policymaking on the side and under the radar.
posted by damo at 5:55 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Andrew Sullivan is on the fake pregnancy story now.

Hmm, that's probably why the link to the hospital list of baby names and photos seems borked at the moment. Hell, the entire hospital's website isn't coming up now. Somewhere in Alaska, an IT department is having fits, poor things.

It's got legs. She's going to have to answer questions on it or drop out, I think.

The legs are wobbly and there are any number of answers that could dispel this rumor.

However, the "She was for the Alaskan Bridge to Nowhere" and "Troopergate" stories have good, strong legs and the plausible answers for them are enough to get several people in a lot of trouble.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 5:58 PM on August 31, 2008



However, the "She was for the Alaskan Bridge to Nowhere" and "Troopergate" stories have good, strong legs and the plausible answers for them are enough to get several people in a lot of trouble.

How sad is that. This is the dems ammo? "Trooper-gate?"

In a country that was even 15% educated as to what our problems really are would take one look at Palin and laugh it's collective asses off.

It's takes some idiotic trumped up scandal to disqualify an obviously completely unqualified numbskull from running the most powerful nation in the history of humanity.

God. I want to cry.
posted by tkchrist at 6:05 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


But here's the thing: you want her to have to "answer questions" about it, but don't you see that - given the extreme unlikelihood of anybody being able to find a smoking afterbirth, even if the rumours somehow were true - it won't mean probing questions about her integrity and judgment from seasoned political reporters? It'll mean heart-to-hearts on the morning talk shows, on which she'll be able to talk about how important her faith is to her, and how these vicious attacks have been deeply hurtful, but ultimately have brought her family even closer together. And she'll get to say how it just shows that the Democrats are running scared if they have to resort to such wild accusations, and how her sudden exposure to the vultures of the mainstream media only make her appreciate the honest, down-to-earth folks back in her hometown all the more.

And in all that time, nobody will be able to ask her about Troopergate, or why she lied about opposing the bridge to nowhere, or how she expects to be VP when she doesn't even understand the most basic elements of foreign policy.

Given that she's the weakest VP candidate in a long, long time, with an embarassment of angles that could be used to attack her, why on earth would you be happy about the dominant one being a conspiracy-theory longshot that has a 1% chance of playing well for your side, and a 99% chance of giving your opponents exactly what they want?
posted by flashboy at 6:05 PM on August 31, 2008 [12 favorites]


I honestly don't think she'll last a month. She's going to withdraw to spend more time with her family. It's kind of obvious that she has a LOT of enemies in Alaska, and they're going to do a lot of talking, and it seems that McCain's camp didn't talk to anybody before they picked her. This whole thing just reaks of desperation. I think McCain just sunk his own campaign by choosing her.
posted by empath at 6:07 PM on August 31, 2008


I am seriously regretting the use of the phrase "smoking afterbirth".
posted by flashboy at 6:10 PM on August 31, 2008 [7 favorites]


I think GrizzlyBay.org did a good job of organising and presenting why Sarah Palin is unfit to serve as Vice President of this (or any) country.
posted by batmonkey at 6:11 PM on August 31, 2008


If the dems really want to hit Palin, why not just run an ad about her husband with the tagline "The McCain campaign is in bed with big oil."
posted by drezdn at 6:11 PM on August 31, 2008


It'll mean heart-to-hearts on the morning talk shows, on which she'll be able to talk about how important her faith is to her, and how these vicious attacks have been deeply hurtful, but ultimately have brought her family even closer together. And she'll get to say how it just shows that the Democrats are running scared if they have to resort to such wild accusations, and how her sudden exposure to the vultures of the mainstream media only make her appreciate the honest, down-to-earth folks back in her hometown all the more.

DOES EVERYBODY SEE THIS? This is it, right here. Let this shit drop. For the next sixty-odd days, all the Dems basically need to do is stick to the script. We do NOT need to basically roll out the red carpet for this person onto center stage. That said:

Given that she's the weakest VP candidate in a long, long time


Am I the only one who misses Stockdale? Holy crap that guy was entertaining.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 6:15 PM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


smoking afterbirth

That is just priceless, flashboy.
posted by cashman at 6:15 PM on August 31, 2008


God. I want to cry.

That's because you still have a shred of hope left. You got to tear that shit out, tkchrist, tear it out.
posted by milarepa at 6:16 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


This is the dems ammo?

No, of course not. The Dems haven't even formulated an attack about Palin yet, nor do they need to. There's plenty of fish to fry and I suspect that'll start happening in earnest after the GOP convention.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 6:19 PM on August 31, 2008


That's because you still have a shred of hope left. You got to tear that shit out, tkchrist, tear it out.

I tried. First I tore one of my kidneys. As an example to the others. But still they all rebelled. My hear kept bleeding. My brain kept thinking up reasons why things are gonna fail. And my hope, laying there, battered and withered, in the corner staring at me with it's one good eye welling with noble tears refused to let go of my innards.

So I took out one of my lungs and shot it right there. BAM!

And I said: Look mother fuckers I ain't playing! Everybody off the boat or I kill this sorry mother fucker (pointing to my dignity) next!

But nobody budged. They called my bluff.
posted by tkchrist at 6:35 PM on August 31, 2008


Are you for or against the death penalty? If you're for it, how to you reconcile the two views?

Not directed at me, I know, and this is not necessarily a reflection of my own views, but I would say that it's much easier to reconcile a viewpoint that purports to execute the guilty, and let the innocent live, than to kill the innocent, and let the guilty live.
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 6:45 PM on August 31, 2008


The reason the Trooper* story is significant is because thanks to the McCain camp's decision to not vet her in any way whatsoever beyond being pretty sure she has a vagina, they failed to uncover that Palin in fact has a record of this. There are multiple instances of her choosing to have people fired essentially for petty, personal reasons. When the scope of your power is restricted to the rule of a town smaller than a World of Warcraft server it makes sense that you have delusions of authority akin to Sean Penn in Mystic River. Apparently the right-wingers are enamored with her nickname of "barracuda" as if being abusive and mean is a positive for the potential leader of the free world.

This person defies any concept of the McCain campaign's new "country first" slogan. Her measly record has recurring stains of abuse of what little power she had, and combined with McCain's infamous flying off the handle in any honest reality these two would be seen as dangerous for our country.


*Holy living mother of fuck can we please stop calling every scandal "-gate." It's not a colloquial term for anything; it was the name of a goddamn building in which no other event of note aside from Ben Stein living there ever happened.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 6:46 PM on August 31, 2008 [9 favorites]


For what it's worth, this is Sarah Palin pregnant with one of her other children.
posted by EarBucket at 6:51 PM on August 31, 2008


There's 1,357 comments; I can't possibly read them all, so I don't know if Diesel Sweeties' take has been posted yet. If not, here it is.
posted by yhbc at 6:52 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Holy shit.

The campaign of John McCain has sent a staff of eight people into Alaska to conduct background checks and vetting on Governor Sarah Palin.

Word is they have have eight rooms reserved at a Wasilla hotel.


This is insane.
posted by EarBucket at 7:12 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


I switched to the Democratic Party a few years ago because I was better than this kind of Rovian shit, so kindly shut the fuck up.

Well. Ahem. I stand corrected.
posted by gjc at 7:23 PM on August 31, 2008


but I would say that it's much easier to reconcile a viewpoint that purports to execute the guilty, and let the innocent live, than to kill the innocent, and let the guilty live.

Opposing abortion fits well into the punitive cleanse-killing mindset because there must be a hallowed state of purity that exists in order for them to kill others for their perceived sins. It's exactly why they are so creepy, because people who cross boundaries of privacy are either murderers or rapists unless they are organized as judging fascists. They believe they are entitled to decide our personal lives either way.
posted by Brian B. at 7:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


This is insane.

John Adams. That was our first vice-president.

Think about that one. But for no longer than two minutes, because any longer and your brain will die.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:37 PM on August 31, 2008


Josh Marshall on why Trooper Gate is important

"We rely on elected officials not to use the power of their office to pursue personal agendas or vendettas. It's called an abuse of power. There is ample evidence that Palin used her power as governor to get her ex-brother-in-law fired. When his boss refused to fire him, she fired his boss. She first denied Monegan's claims of pressure to fire Wooten and then had to amend her story when evidence proved otherwise. The available evidence now suggests that she 1) tried to have an ex-relative fired from his job for personal reasons, something that was clearly inappropriate, and perhaps illegal, though possibly understandable in human terms, 2) fired a state official for not himself acting inappropriately by firing the relative, 3) lied to the public about what happened and 4) continues to lie about what happened. "

What most people don't seem to be getting is that this isn't about Palin's sleazy brother in law trooper getting fired, it's that she fired Monegan, the Public Safety Commissioner, because he wouldn't back her personal agenda. Forget about the ridiculous pregnancy thing, this story has legs.
posted by afu at 7:39 PM on August 31, 2008 [6 favorites]


JESUS CHRIST.
11. Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.
-Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire for GOP candidates
The Pledge of Allegiance did not originally contain the words "under God."

When it was written in 1892.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:45 PM on August 31, 2008 [13 favorites]


The Pledge of Allegiance did not originally contain the words "under God."

You're one of them reality based fellas, ain't ya?
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 7:49 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


For the love of all things sacred in this world, I am begging you folks: please, please, please drop this horseshit conversation about Palin's pregnancy and what she may or may not have done. It has fuck-all to do with her ability (or gross lack thereof) to serve as VP of the US, it goes against every fucking tenet of the pro-choice movement, and it is just unseemly and unbefitting this site as imaginable.

And beyond that, where's the scandal? Someone takes a bribe, someone cheats, someone steals, I get why people want to get to the bottom of such stories. Let's say a 16 year old girl gets pregnant and the baby is going to be born with Down Syndrome. Let's say her (naturally older and more experienced) parents decide to adopt the baby and raise it as their own. Is that such a bad thing? For any of the involved parties?
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 7:49 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


where's the scandal?

I don't think her base would see it this way, but from my way of thinking, (if true) it's that she chose to run for vice president knowing that she hadn't been vetted and this would come out and expose her daughter to the world. Also, choosing to place the child (symbolically) at the center of her campaign.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:01 PM on August 31, 2008


Well, it would say a whole lot about the McCain campaign's complete lack of investigation. "Okay, now, just one more question - all these kids; are they all yours? You understand, we just have to ask."
posted by yhbc at 8:02 PM on August 31, 2008


Sorry to keep posting TPM links, but this is an interesting angle I haven't seen brought up. How will Palin's endorsement of Buchanan affect the jewish vote?
posted by afu at 8:02 PM on August 31, 2008


it's that she chose to run for vice president knowing that she hadn't been vetted and this would come out and expose her daughter to the world.

the next time people accuse republicans of being "american morons" i'm going to remember this thread and all the idiotic speculation on this subject you and others have indulged in

you're every bit as bad as they are
posted by pyramid termite at 8:05 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Pledge of Allegiance did not originally contain the words "under God." When it was written in 1892.

There you go again with that intellectual snobbery. Joe Sixpack and Sally Walmart can't relate to things like "facts". Everyone knows Americans are drooling imbeciles who need their steak cut for them and fed to them on forks of liberty. This is why Americans today love Bush, love the war, and why they've let the farthest right control Congress. And you can't tell me different! LAlalalalalalalala!
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 8:05 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Hey, pyramid termite, that's uncalled for. I'm not saying it's true, I'm answering PSH's question about where the scandal is. My answer, shortened: people with secrets they want to keep shouldn't step in the spotlight. If that's moronic, then I suppose I'm a moron. But I fail to see how it's untrue.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:08 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.
....

Seriously, what are we supposed to do about someone that stupid? That's like me saying, hey, McCain fans, watch out, a kid at the record store today told me he wasn't voting for "that Nazi McCain".


You can't just dismiss a voter like this as stupid - she probably isn't.

This is a really serious issue. What does it mean to American political discourse when a large (if minority) part of the population seriously believes that Obama is radically left wing? He's not even radical compared to other members of the Democratic Party -- trust me, I'm left-wing (seriously mellowed over time, but still radical by American standards), and the online "Who should I vote for" things always tell me that I agree most with Kucinich and then (a distant second) Edwards -- Obama comes way down the list. He's been making noises about protectionist economic policies, but there are rumours that's just talk; the Economist (which hovers somewhere slightly to the left of Ronald Regan) has been shaking a finger at that protectionist talk, but otherwise talking somewhat approvingly of his economic plans.

I believe that konolia's aquaintance really does believe that Obama is a communist. Perhaps she believes that he will nationalise industries, or collectivise farms or something. But even if she is honest about it, she is deeply misinformed as to the facts - either his positions, or what it means to be a communist or socialist.

Watching this election from the inside but being an outsider, I can't help but feel that your political discourse is seriously broken. Or maybe the world's political discourse is broken, since my Canadian province did happily elect a party which promised fiscal responsibility by cutting taxes and selling off valuable assets to their associates for next-to-nothing and who left the province in desparate financial straits. But that government is still a by-word for "fiscal responsibility".

To be a bit melodramatic, I feel like I'm living in an Orwell novel. Black is white, the Ontario Tories are fiscally responsible, the American Republicans are competant in international relations and security and a centrist candidate is a communist.

How do we fix this? Democracy cannot function in a world of rumour and misunderstanding and disinformation - people can't make the best choices if they don't understand what those choices really are.

And I'm not saying that just because they don't agree with me, they must be misinformed. I respect the voter who understands the issues, and really believes the other solution is better. (If I think they are wrong, I will tell them so, and try to find the best research and information to demostrate why.) People also have different values to balance - I, for instance, might vote for a more economically centrist candidate would push for gay marriage over a more left wing one who wanted a ban on gay marriages.

But I worry deeply about voters who are swayed by labels and names and rumours, who don't really understand what the policies are that they are voting for, and how that will affect them and their children. Like someone who seriously believes that an American candidate proposed by a major party is radically left-wing, let alone communist. I mean, the Communist Party of China isn't even communist anymore!* This voter may or may not have agreed with the candidate on his actual platform, but as it is she clearly does not know or understand his platform. Which means that democracy is breaking.

*Still really scary and authoritarian, though sometimes they surprise me.
posted by jb at 8:13 PM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


it seems that McCain's camp didn't talk to anybody before they picked her.

Sarah Palin Wasn't Vetted
"There are reports that the McCain campaign came up with the idea to pick Palin a week ago, and then only vetted her for four days. That would explain the plethora of bad news the blogs and the corporate media have been able to find on her in such a short period of time. And now we have even more evidence that John McCain simply wung it in picking a neophyte with no national security experience as the person who may replace him as president in as little as six months. McCain didn't even check her hometown paper to see what it had to say about her. At some point, McCain's actions become reckless. You don't choose a vice presidential candidate who isn't qualified simply because she might help you pick up a few votes here and there. It's Dan Quayle, and Harriet Miers, and Brownie all over again. And it speaks very poorly of John McCain's first significant decision as our potentially future commander in chief."
posted by ericb at 8:14 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Hey, pyramid termite, that's uncalled for.

if you don't want people saying you smell, get out of the sewer - the scandal is people's willingness to stoop to any level of vicious slander in the interest of partisan politics
posted by pyramid termite at 8:15 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Pledge of Allegiance did not originally contain the words "under God." When it was written in 1892.

Originally written here in Boston by Francis Bellamy (Baptist minister and Vice President of Education, Society of Christian Socialists) at 142 Berkeley St./209 Columbus Ave., Boston -- the building (known as 'The Historical Pledge of Allegiance Building') in which is now located (among others) the New England Bartending School ... and long-standing gay bar Club Café.
posted by ericb at 8:26 PM on August 31, 2008


Idiots, can't you see the hand of Rove behind the pregnancy bullshit?

If you dumbshits continue to press on with this moronic hypothesis, all you will accomplish is to distract voters from other much more important issues. Which is exactly what the Republican party desperately, desperately needs, because on every other count they're doomed to failure.

Get smarter, people. Don't fall for the easy hype.
posted by five fresh fish at 8:33 PM on August 31, 2008 [7 favorites]


Word, fff.

Remember that really cool part of Obama speech on Thursday, where he talked about making the race about big important stuff, cause this is a big important time? And not getting caught up in the stupid small stuff?

This.
is.
small.

Human (and American) produced climate change destroying the city of New Orleans every three years is not small stuff. Transitioning away from fossil fuels (some good talking points against Palin, here) is not small stuff. Having the knowledge and wherewithal to make strong choices with a level head in the face of a chaotic world is not small stuff. McCain/Palin suck on all these fronts; hit them there. Make this an election about the small stuff and the Republicans will win. Obama has been consistently driving the narrative this entire election; the fact that McCain can't keep a straight story works to Obama's favor. And the high road, with big issues, is where the narrative needs to stay, for Obama to win and for the better of the country. Let's put country first!
posted by kaibutsu at 8:50 PM on August 31, 2008 [19 favorites]


Idiots, can't you see the hand of Rove behind the pregnancy bullshit?

Oh, come now. Karl Rove certainly has the power to accomplish many nefarious deeds, but getting someone pregnant with his hand strains credulity!

posted by scody at 8:52 PM on August 31, 2008 [15 favorites]


Well said, kaibutsu.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:53 PM on August 31, 2008


If she wanted to be president, then she wouldn't have been from Alaska.
posted by every_one_needs_a_hug_sometimes at 9:05 PM on August 31, 2008


Am I the only one who misses Stockdale? Holy crap that guy was entertaining.

Who was he? Why was he here?
posted by the_bone at 9:07 PM on August 31, 2008 [6 favorites]


One person said: I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.
....


Then another one responded: Seriously, what are we supposed to do about someone that stupid? That's like me saying, hey, McCain fans, watch out, a kid at the record store today told me he wasn't voting for "that Nazi McCain".

Lastly, jb chimed in with: You can't just dismiss a voter like this as stupid - she probably isn't.

Sure we can dismiss this person as stupid. If anybody seriously thinks that a candidate for president of the United States of America in 2008 gets this far into the process while being a tried and true Communist is, in fact, a card carrying idiot. A person like this is so far to the right that he or she cannot even see the center. You really think that a person that thinks this way would even consider voting Democratic, no matter who the candidate is? If someone were to dig up the rotten corpse of Jesse Helms from Oakwood Cemetary here in Raleigh, dress him up in a suit and called him the official presidential candidate for the Democratic Party, this White Goodman wannabe that konolia speaks of would dismiss him as a Commie.
Heh, "Communist."
posted by NoMich at 9:10 PM on August 31, 2008 [8 favorites]


Who was he? Why was he here?

Vice Admiral James Bond "Skeet Skeet" Stockdale was H. Ross Perot's VP running mate in 1992. He was a Vietnam War POW like McCain, and is best known for such riveting performances as this and this.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 9:14 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


I really don't understand all the "don't go there" stuff. You act like we're all democratic operatives and you're all PR geniuses. As far as I can tell, everyone writing about this are just political junkies with an axe to grind. The Obama CAMPAIGN is never going to touch this story with a 600 foot pole. If it ever becomes an issue, it will be because the media makes it an issue. I'm sure the National Enquirer will find the story, if there is one.

I think she may drop out before it even gets to that point, anyway. Not just for the weird pregnancy story, but because she's way over her head.
posted by empath at 9:14 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


The Pledge of Allegiance did not originally contain the words "under God." When it was written in 1892.

Marisa STPT: There you go again with that intellectual snobbery. Joe Sixpack and Sally Walmart can't relate to things like "facts". Everyone knows Americans are drooling imbeciles who need their steak cut for them and fed to them on forks of liberty. This is why Americans today love Bush, love the war, and why they've let the farthest right control Congress. And you can't tell me different! LAlalalalalalalala!

If this is directed at me, perhaps you missed how I replied to your (rather more graciously stated, but hey, it's been a long frustrating thread) objection earlier: The tone, as well as the substance, of Obama's supporters' critiques will affect whether people on the fence will want to vote for him.

Derision and petty dirt-digging directed by Obama supporters at private "issues" like being a former beauty pageant contestant, having a Bachelor's in journalism from U of Idaho, choosing to have a Down syndrome child, the infinitesimal chance that that child is really her daughter's, will not help Obama to cement his hard-won place.

It's likely to turn people who are not already Obama fans right the fuck off. Facts about Palin's lack of experience, lying about her support for the Bridge to Nowhere, abuses of power as mayor, ignorance of her own country's history, emblazoned across public psyches with something that at least resembles objectivity and class - this is more likely to find root with former or wavering Republicans who are receptive to facts and good-faith debates and are sick to death of the kind of Rovian juvenile gossip that this thread has unfortunately proven isn't restricted to right-wingers.
posted by cybercoitus interruptus at 9:15 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Honestly, cybercoitous interruptus, my comment was not directed at you. I was just using a really ham-fisted satire of the argument that Americans are idiots who love Republicans. I entirely agree that for Democrats to suddenly take the low road in this campaign would be a huge mistake, and I'm fairly confident the Obama campaign isn't going to exert the effort needed to talk about Palin's reproductive system, when all they have to do is keep their hands at 10 and 2 on cruise control.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 9:23 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


The tone, as well as the substance, of Obama's supporters' critiques will affect whether people on the fence will want to vote for him.

That's complete bullshit and it flies in the face of 200 years of political history in the US. Negative campaigning works, and that has been proven over and over again. If Obama's campaign keeps its hands clean, then the blowback should be minimal. I say that Obama's supporters should be free to be as dirty as they want. And nobody can stop them anyway. If Obama had the power to stop them, he'd be responsible for them, but he doesn't and he's not.
posted by empath at 9:31 PM on August 31, 2008


“Meanwhile, Palin’s mother-in-law, Faye Palin, told a New York Daily News reporter that she didn’t agree with Sarah on everything and hadn’t yet decided how she would vote. She added: “I’m not sure what she brings to the ticket other than she’s a woman and a conservative.
posted by drezdn at 9:36 PM on August 31, 2008


Is it too late to blame bush?
posted by Balisong at 9:48 PM on August 31, 2008


Does anyone know more about this:
"Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units. As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden's.

She's also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security's counterterrorism plans.

Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country's defense. Given Alaska's proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don't even know about."

posted by =^^= at 9:53 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


And now we have even more evidence that John McCain simply wung it in picking a neophyte

wung? christ in a turbocharged prius, bloggers are fucking dumb.
posted by quonsar at 9:55 PM on August 31, 2008


So that puts her on a level with Poland? Man, everyone forgets Poland.
posted by Artw at 9:56 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sure we can dismiss this person as stupid. If anybody seriously thinks that a candidate for president of the United States of America in 2008 gets this far into the process while being a tried and true Communist is, in fact, a card carrying idiot

She didn't literally mean that she thought he was a card carrying member of the Communist party. She was just expressing how she saw him as a leftist. Please remember that to folks on the right the word "communist" is kinda an epithet for those folks they see as on the extreme left. I AM telling you that a lot of people I know really do see him as an extreme leftist whether or not that is where Democrats think he fits on the political spectrum.
posted by konolia at 10:01 PM on August 31, 2008


remember, everything you say here will be here, pretty much forever. giggle.
posted by dawson at 10:08 PM on August 31, 2008


If Obama had the power to stop them, he'd be responsible for them, but he doesn't and he's not.

The rules that apply to Democrats do not apply to Republicans. Obama will be blamed for this shit, and it will hurt his campaign.
posted by dirigibleman at 10:16 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Does anyone know more about this

It's a bit of a stretch. First of all, "Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks." - According to the PDF file accompanying that article, the 49th Missile Defense Battalion is a part of 100th Missile Defense Brigade, which was made operational in response to the 2006 North Korea missile "crisis". Also, Alaska is not our "first line of defense", nor does it protect "the entire nation" from attacks - that's a hefty pinch of hyperbole.

To say that "her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden's" is laughable, and even the author of the blog post says himself that this is "highly unlikely as Biden's seat on the Foreign Relations committee would expose him to information on a very wide array of topics."

"She's also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security's counterterrorism plans." - Numerous states have SDF's which are federally recognized. What their involvment with Homeland Security is, I don't know, and the author of the post doesn't cite any source for that, either.

"Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country's defense. Given Alaska's proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don't even know about." - Maybe, maybe not. Maybe she likes 7-11 pizza. Who the hell knows?
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Re: Palin receiving national security briefings: the AP debunks.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:22 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Some Conservatives Air Concerns Over Palin.
posted by ericb at 10:24 PM on August 31, 2008


birdherder writes "And the Cindy McCain foreign policy experience because lives close to Alaska? That's bullshit! On my map Alaska is down off the coast of California next to Hawaii. "

I've often wondered whether a significant portion of Americans think Alaska is an island. Maps never show any bit of the Yukon and it is usually floating in the pacific somewhere, often not even in an inset.

ericb writes "Aboard Alaska Airlines, the flight lasted for eight hours, with an additional landing in Seattle."

Good thing they didn't have one of those 12 hour quasi hostage situations where they don't let anyone leave the plane because they've already pushed off.

delmoi writes "Ugh, you're kidding right? It's illegal to take pregnancy and reproductive choices into consideration when hiring!! My guess is you've never been anywhere near a hiring committee. If you did that, the woman could sue your company into the ground. "

How about for filing a false birth certificate? I don't know about Alaska specifically but it is illegal in many states because they want to chase down deadbeat dads instead of providing welfare.

torticat writes "They had three children in four years and then two more over the next 14. They don't believe abortion is an option. Connect the dots. "

A change to butsecks?

konolia writes "I thought it was the extremists who came over the Iraqi border from Syria and Jordan who are murdering innocents over there. AT least that is what the soldier from church who comes to my house and eats at my table says. The soldier who has actually BEEN over there to see for himself."

Was he one of those soldiers who blew up Canadians or Brits?
posted by Mitheral at 10:26 PM on August 31, 2008


EDIT: Regarding SDFs - I take back what I said about Homeland Security. It says right there in the Wiki article that "SDFs generally operate with emergency management and homeland security missions." and later on, "Efforts are being made in Congress to better integrate the State Defense Forces into a larger Homeland Security strategy." So it doesn't seem Alaska is necessarily unique in that regard.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:29 PM on August 31, 2008


Andrew Sullivan is now backing off the childbirth rumor, as photos of her clearly pregnant surface.

McCain says in an interview that she possesses more experience than Obama.

Sometimes, I read things and I feel as if I am going crazy.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:29 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Trust me: it's not the kind of thing that would lose her any support among her already-ardent fanbase

That was my point. It's an interesting bit of internet-detectiving in and of itself (with all the odd bits of info/behavior/coincidence, my gut says something is fishy there), but in the big picture: so what.

I don't think any Dem supporter really wants the Dems touching this issue, because the blowback could be huge. My guess is that Palin's supporters and likely-supporters would love her all the more for it, since it's the classic, old-fashioned, religious thing to do to "protect her daughter's honor" and whatnot.
posted by rokusan at 10:29 PM on August 31, 2008


marisa stole: Vice Admiral James Bond "Skeet Skeet" Stockdale was H. Ross Perot's VP running mate in 1992. He was a Vietnam War POW like McCain, and is best known for such riveting performances as this and this.

I know. T'was just a quip about his soaring rhetorical gifts at the '92 VP debate. :)
posted by the_bone at 10:36 PM on August 31, 2008


Has Palin ever been to Washington, D.C.?
posted by Rumple at 10:40 PM on August 31, 2008


I know. T'was just a quip about his soaring rhetorical gifts at the '92 VP debate. :)

That's what I loved about Stockdale! Here we have a very wooden Gore, an unwatchable Quayle, and then ... some old guy who stumbled in from the Denny's brunch buffet. By comparison, Stockdale was as entertaining as a monkey on a unicycle.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:41 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


The rules that apply to Democrats do not apply to Republicans. Obama will be blamed for this shit, and it will hurt his campaign.

Insofar as this is true, it may require a take-no-prisoners approach to this election to finally break the hold of the Republican dominionist minority over the downward trajectory our country is taking.

In any case, Palin wishes to push her morality down everyone's throats, and her role as VP would give her greater realm to exercise those wishes, so her own life choices deserve just as much scrutiny, as offensive as that might be to the sensibilities of some.

That kind of scrutiny may bring the left "down," but the religious right and their Republican representatives never hesitate to play dirty pool, so putting a spotlight on these hypocrites may be necessary to save the country.

In any case, when was calling out hypocrisy "dirty pool"? When we did agree to become a nation of cowards, unable to confront bullies at their own game?

Ultimately, there's a lot to point out about Palin's utter inadequacies as a Vice Presidential candidate. Her abuse of her position, her ignorance about basic American civil history, her Creationist, anti-reason views, her complete lack of experience on the national and international scene, etc. So Obama's campaign doesn't need to address any of the bizarre circumstances surrounding her supposed "pregnancy".

There's a lot to work with. There's a lot Obama's campaign should work with. I would question giving Obama my vote if he did not fight back against the American Taliban. It sucks, but there is a Culture War, the stakes are as high as they have ever been, and the sooner the good guys start fighting fire with a fire extinguisher, the better.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 10:43 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


photos of her clearly pregnant surface
What about her clearly pregnant interior?
posted by lukemeister at 10:44 PM on August 31, 2008


What about her clearly pregnant interior?

You'll have to speak to her doctor for photos of that.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:52 PM on August 31, 2008


I would question giving Obama my vote if he did not fight back against the American Taliban. It sucks, but there is a Culture War, the stakes are as high as they have ever been, and the sooner the good guys start fighting fire with a fire extinguisher, the better.

I appreciate where you're coming from, but something about this Machiavellian aspect bothers me. Maybe because I've spent considerable time arguing that we should not torture POWs nor bomb civilians because we are better than our enemies. I like to think that being better than your opponent counts for something, and the moral high ground is certainly working for Obama thus far.

Exposing hypocrisy is fine. But on issues that matter. Her acting like the drunken sheriff of an Old West town in terms of abuse of power, while at the same time touting good Christian values, that's an excellent example. The possibility of covering her daughter's kid as her own? Not so much. Probably because a) it drags the poor girl through the mud when she shouldn't even be in the discussion and b) there's nothing wrong with trying to protect your child's honor, though our definition of "honor" my vary.

The end that some think justifies these means doesn't need these means. Like you said, we've got plenty more to work with. Why would we not only chance it all by playing dirty, but also play dirty in the first place? I don't see it as cowardice so much as trying to elevate this discourse.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:57 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


You silly children may wanna read up a bit on James Stockdale before you dismiss him as an old ignorant idiot. Quite educated, he was widely seen as a philosopher and,even the anti-war folks admired his intellect and courage. Probably you haven't even read one book about him, but he's sorta not someone to make fun of. Damn, people in the states really are mostly stupid, callous and egocentric.
posted by dawson at 10:59 PM on August 31, 2008


Oh, lighten up, dawson. We're talking about his debate performance, not his entire carreer. Even Lennon had his lousy shows.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:01 PM on August 31, 2008


That pic of her pregnant looks old, like 1980s-old with the big frizz hair and big glasses.... Recent pictures showing her pregnant.

It's time to drop this ridiculous, distracting story and focus on real reasons she is not a good VP candidate.
posted by Rumple at 11:05 PM on August 31, 2008


One person said: I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.
....

Then another one responded: Seriously, what are we supposed to do about someone that stupid? That's like me saying, hey, McCain fans, watch out, a kid at the record store today told me he wasn't voting for "that Nazi McCain".

Lastly, jb chimed in with: You can't just dismiss a voter like this as stupid - she probably isn't.

Sure we can dismiss this person as stupid.
Or we can describe her as an effective "Republican by Faith" who proselytizes her single-issue insanity to very great effect. "Republican" has come to mean "Christian Fundamentals" in the USA. It means effective theocracy: the law will be guided by the fundamentals of the Christian faith.

These are the people who voted a second time despite his self-evident failures for the exact same person and power structure. Despite the harm to America's interests these people would vote for Bush a third time: konolia as plain as admits it by remaining a staunch supporter of Bush! It is astounding but true.

Honestly, get the hell out of the country if konolia's demographic are going to be influential in determining whether the US is managed in the broad interests of the public good vis a vis the quality of education, healthcare, fiscal security, and the basic capability of self-sustainance; or the very specific interest of an anti-science, anti-social, anti-independent-freedom clan of Christian Dominionists. You're heading toward Iranian-style rule.
I still like George [Bush]. My son just graduated from USAFA, and Bush was there, saluting and shaking hands with every grad. My son said to him, "Sir, your approval rating is high with me!" You can see on the DVD (yes, I have one) where Bush pulls him back and says something to him. What he said was this: "Approval ratings are not important. What is important is doing the right thing."
I want to vote for people who are interested in doing the right thing, not the popular thing.
They are single-issue morons. Regardless the economic harm to the country as the result of incompetence or malice, regardless the security risks as the result of incompetence, regardless the rights reductions as the result of malic and power-seeking, regardless the wholesale theft of public services and public interests, she will vote for only those candidates who oppose abortion to the point of banning it entirely. Fuck the rest of you, your best interests, your health and welfare, abortion must be banned.

America's biggest security risks are within the country, not outside it.
posted by five fresh fish at 11:05 PM on August 31, 2008 [20 favorites]


where I say Rove, I mean the Rovian-style apparatchik. The Kristolites. Neo-Straussians.
posted by five fresh fish at 11:20 PM on August 31, 2008


"Republican" has come to mean "Christian Fundamentals" in the USA. It means effective theocracy: the law will be guided by the fundamentals of the Christian faith.

This brings Goldwater to mind:
There is no position on which people are so immovable as their religious beliefs. There is no more powerfull ally one can claim in a debate than Jesus, God, or Allah, or whatever one calls the supreme being. But like any powerful weapon, the use of God’s name on one’s behalf should be used sparingly. The religious factions that are growing throughout our land are not using their religious clout with wisdom. They are trying to force government leaders into following their position 100 percent. If you disagree with these religious groups on a particular moral issue, they complain, they threaten you with a loss of money or votes or both. I’m frankly sick and tired of the political preachers across this country telling me as a citizen that if I want to be a moral person, I must believe in A,B,C, and D. Just who do they think they are? And from where do they presume to claim the right to dictate their moral beliefs to me? And I am even more angry as a legislator who must endure the threats of every religious group who thinks it has some God-granted right to control my vote on every roll call in the Senate. I am warning them today: I will fight them every step of the way if they try to dictate their moral convictions to all Americans in the name of conservatism.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:23 PM on August 31, 2008 [4 favorites]


Andrew Sullivan is now backing off the childbirth rumor, as photos of her clearly pregnant surface.

Oh please, they're totally Photoshopped. Notice how the cameraman isn't focused on Palin? and how her clothing appears so dark, yet the walls are creme colored and there's a bright light in the room. As every educated person knows, Tidios's third principle of light clearly states that the wavelength of light is converted spontaneously into something else that'll fit the theory.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 11:26 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


I can hardly wait for Tuesday. Hopefully Obama will be well-rested and ready to again spin the dream of an America worth living in. I'm tired of this pregnancy bullshit and anti-abortion bullshit and first sexy librarian bullshit.

America is better than this. America deserves more than this.
posted by five fresh fish at 11:38 PM on August 31, 2008


Does anyone know more about this:

Yes. It's utter bullshit. The Alaska National Guard is under Federal supervision and Palin was never even involved in national security briefings. The person on that Blackfive site has strip-mined the harshest depths of his own ass to acquire this hypothesis. Rigging was necessary. Canaries died.

It is absolutely amazing the lengths people are going to pretend that Palin has even the remotest level of national security credibility. It's gone from unbelievable to laughable to insulting at this point. The people who are supporting her are deliberately choosing to put their fanaticism over her being an anti-choice creationist above the fact that she is completely incompetent. That is, in fact, the very opposite of "putting country first."
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 11:40 PM on August 31, 2008 [15 favorites]


But here's the thing: you want her to have to "answer questions" about it, but don't you see that - given the extreme unlikelihood of anybody being able to find a smoking afterbirth, even if the rumours somehow were true - it won't mean probing questions about her integrity and judgment from seasoned political reporters? It'll mean heart-to-hearts on the morning talk shows, on which she'll be able to talk about how important her faith is to her, and how these vicious attacks have been deeply hurtful, but ultimately have brought her family even closer together. -- flashboy
Exactly! The people pushing this are crazy. Crazy to think it could ever happen in the real world, crazy to think 'asking questions' about it could do any good, crazy to think they could ever be proven right, and most of all, crazy to think this could possibly convince people to vote for Obama.

I swear some people are so filled with anti-republican rage they can't even see straight. Not that the republicans aren't worthy targets, but incoherent ranting and conspiratorial thinking isn't going to help anyone.

That said, I doubt these rumors are going to have any impact beyond the blogs and the depths of Daily Kos diaries. I do think this pick will seriously damage McCain overall, and undecidedes hate her see this Joe Kline post about a Frank Luntz focus group. Swing voters think she's ridiculous.
I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: "she wasn't voting for that Communist" meaning Obama.

“I guess that puts me in a box of being hard-core Republican ... the Democrats also preach individual freedoms and individual rights, capitalism, free market, let-it-do-its-thing-best, let people keep as much of their money that they earn as possible. And when it comes to, like, the Party machine, no one will accuse me of being partisan.” -- Sarah Palin
...
By the way, about that national guard stuff, apparently she's not involved in any of the actual military aspects, only in coordinating disaster relief and stuff.
How about for filing a false birth certificate? I don't know about Alaska specifically but it is illegal in many states because they want to chase down deadbeat dads instead of providing welfare.
-- Birth Certificates are sealed for 100 years in Alaska (It's sad that I even know this). No one has accused her of faking his birth certificate. Jesus.
Sometimes, I read things and I feel as if I am going crazy.
The republican party is about to have convention halfway canceled due to a hurricane, and McCain is going to deliver his acceptance speech from Louisiana via satellite. Republicans are seriously trying to argue that this half a term governor has national security experience because Alaska is close to Russia, and they apparently didn't do a background check at all.

It's all very weird.
posted by delmoi at 11:40 PM on August 31, 2008 [1 favorite]


Maybe because I've spent considerable time arguing that we should not torture POWs nor bomb civilians

But we don't bomb civilians; konolia said so. Must have been those dastardly Syrians again; curse their low animal cunning!
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 11:43 PM on August 31, 2008 [3 favorites]


John McCain's Wandering Eyes
posted by the_bone at 11:46 PM on August 31, 2008


You know who else grew up believing his grandmother was really his mother?
posted by Sailormom at 11:52 PM on August 31, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin may very well think the Founding Fathers wrote the Pledge of Allegiance, but the quote doesn't prove that she does:
Are you offended by the phrase “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

SP: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.
All that proves is that she thinks the Founding Fathers used the phrase "Under God."
posted by NortonDC at 12:29 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Marisa Stole the Precious Thing writes "Am I the only one who misses Stockdale? Holy crap that guy was entertaining."


the_bone writes "Who was he? Why was he here?"


Marisa Stole the Precious Thing writes "Vice Admiral James Bond 'Skeet Skeet' Stockdale was H. Ross Perot's VP running mate in 1992. He was a Vietnam War POW like McCain, and is best known for such riveting performances as this and this."


Marisa, can you also explain what just went whizzing by over your head?
posted by orthogonality at 12:30 AM on September 1, 2008


Wow, take a look at this polling data from CNN:

"Suppose you could cast two separate votes in November -- one just for president and another vote just for vice president. Who would you be more likely to vote for if you could vote separately for vice president: Joe Biden, the Democrat, or Sarah Palin, the Republican?"

Biden: 54%
Palin: 41%
Neither: 4%
Unsure: 1%


An experienced warhorse of the Senate like Biden with a resume like a phonebook and foregin policy credentials out the wazoo versus a less-than-one-term governor of Alaska who two years ago ruled a town smaller than some large universities, and the result is that close?
posted by Rhaomi at 12:54 AM on September 1, 2008


I really don't understand all the "don't go there" stuff. You act like we're all democratic operatives and you're all PR geniuses.

As someone who plans to talk to as many people in swing states as possible over the course of the next two months, you're damned right I'm thinking about how I'm going to convince people to make up their mind for Obama and against McCain. If I have one impression to put into a person's head, I don't think the babby is the argument to try. I'm not saying we should be PR 'geniuses,' but we should at least use our heads. It's important not to look like a crackpot conspiracy theorist when trying to win someone over to your side.

And, furthermore, I have no problem with Obama using negative campaign tactics, because there is a metric shit ton of stuff to legitimately go negative on McCain about. Family values? Left his wife and children for a model with money. Principle? His words on the value of experience are the flop heard 'round the world. Honor? Did you see the celebrity ads? And these are the values he claims to hold highest; he fails by just about every other yardstick you care to measure by as well.

Again, there are much, easier, clearer narratives to pin on the guy without getting into the pregnancy or abortion (non)issues.
posted by kaibutsu at 12:54 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin's Pregnancy Decision Map
posted by chuckdarwin at 1:48 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


konolia writes "BTW, for you Obama fans, you might want to work on something...I forgot to mention-when one of my fitness instructors told me she was voting for McCain, she also said-and her exact words were something like this: 'she wasn't voting for that Communist' meaning Obama. "

Someone else who thinks Obama's a Communist (and maybe the anti-Christ):
I don't want a political label, but Obama bears traits that resemble the anti- Christ and I'm scared to death that un- educated people will ignorantly vote him into office. My mom likes him because his children are well dressed!

You see, what bothers me most, besides being a Communist, and a racist ...
--Saturday Night Live alum best known for playing the role of a ditzy blonde, Victoria Jackson.
posted by orthogonality at 1:58 AM on September 1, 2008


An experienced warhorse of the Senate like Biden with a resume like a phonebook and foregin policy credentials out the wazoo versus a less-than-one-term governor of Alaska who two years ago ruled a town smaller than some large universities, and the result is that close?

Close? Biden's got 13 points on her, with only 5% not choosing either of them. That's not close; that's a landslide.

The early polls indicate that Palin is clearly a polarizing candidate (and, interestingly, that she fares better among men than women). This will help the GOP in turning out their base, but base turnout alone does not win elections. Biden, on the other hand, polled the highest among undecideds/independents on the question of VP. (He polled second to Clinton among Democrats; the kicker was that Clinton polled the worst among undecided/independents.)

Now, imagine how a Joe Lieberman, Tim Pawlenty, or Kay Bailey Hutchinson would be polling against Biden right now. That, I'll wager, would be close, because ample numbers of undecideds, moderates, and independents would be more predisposed to positive impressions of them. But McCain seems not to have wanted to play to the middle on this; he played to the margins. Whether this indicates more fear of his own party's extremists or contempt for his own country's moderates (not to mention Hillary Clinton's supporters), I can't rightly say. But it does mean that while the likes of Bill Kristol might be over the moon with the choice of Palin, she's actually starting off in the red, polling-wise, with the very segment of the population that's ultimately going to decide the election.
posted by scody at 2:03 AM on September 1, 2008


Rhaomi writes "An experienced warhorse of the Senate like Biden with a resume like a phonebook and foregin policy credentials out the wazoo versus a less-than-one-term governor of Alaska who two years ago ruled a town smaller than some large universities, and the result is that close?"

In voting terms, 54-41is no where near close. It's a commanding lead just short of a landslide.

But more importantly, CNN's other polls show the race to be Obama 49% to McCain 48%. When your VP candidate is actually lagging behind the ticket as a whole, she's hurting the ticket. The whole point of a VP is to shore up a ticket, to increase its market share.

Now in certain niche markets, like Konolia's son and other Fundamentalist Christians, Palin may be what gets them to vote rather than skipping the race altogether because they detest McCain. But if she's only getting 41% against Joe Biden -- and Joe's getting a clear majority at 54% -- not only is that not close, it means McCain's gamble on Palin has misfired.

---

Now, imagine for a second you're Karl Rove. You got Bush into office on the Fundie vote, and you won Ohio and thus the race in '04 on Fundies who went to the polls to vote against gay marriage. You, Karl, know that you're not winning in '08: the long term models (Lichtman, etc.) say you won't, the '06 vote says you won't, the several dozen Republicans holding state-wide or Federal offices who won't be showing up at the Republican Convention says you won't.

And while you, Karl, have won on the backs of the Fundies, the Fundies don't really trsut you anymore. David Kuo, your token Fundie, described how you (Karl) and other White House political bosses laughed at and mocked Christians and Christianity. John DiIulio, Bush's Director of Faith-Based... Initiatives said the same thing. The Fundies are starting to feel used, and the smarter Fundies have begun to realize that subordinating Jesus to the needs of a political party debase Jesus. And that that's why polls of young people show they see Christianity as not about Jesus, or the crucification, or the Sermon on the Mount, but as a religion primarily preoccupied with persecuting gays.

You (Karl) have an problem: you know John McCain's gonna lose, and lose bad. You've never liked the guy anyway; you dragged his daughter through the mud to win the South Carolina primary in 2000. And your crack force of Christian Fundamentalist voters is waking up to realization they've been used.

So Karl's gonna make that problem an opportunity: saddle John McCain, who is going to lose anyway, with a token Fundie Christian running mate.

This is genius, for several reasons:
1. in 2012, you (Karl) can tell the Fundies that the Republican Party does respect them, the Palin candidacy proves it,
2. but the atheistic Communist liberals lynched her because she was a Christian.
3. Fundies love believing that they are a persecuted minority "just like" the 1st Century Christians, a small remnant hewing at great personal cost to the flickering flames of the truth they painfully but joyously carry like embers in their mouths. A "martyred" Palin fits right into this narrative, and ties "suffering minority for Jesus" meme to the "suffering minority Republican" meme, further cementing Fundies to a Republican Party that uses and despises them.
4. But it also gives Karl and his people an excuse not to put up a Fundie in 2012, allowing them to maintain control of the Party in the face of loose cannon and heir-apparent Mike Huckabee (who will either deal with Karl and get the nod, or buck Karl and get shafted),
5. By saying privately to the non-Fundie Republicans that the Fundie base is back under control and will vote for whatever oligarch, emplaced by Karl, will throw them a few worthless crumbs.

By putting a not ready for national politics Fundie into a sure-loss race, Karl gets to: further fuck over McCain, and demonstrate to any other potential maverick that mavericks get knee-capped; throw a sop to the Fundies; and keep the Fundies hating "the Libs" over the 2008 loss, rather than questioning what the Republicans are really doing for Fundie goals.

Pure genius, and the Fundies will never even know that they've once again been used and tossed aside.
posted by orthogonality at 2:46 AM on September 1, 2008 [18 favorites]


All those numbers are great, guys, but as Stalin always knew, you just can't beat the Diebold-Premier Edge™.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 3:07 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


A picture of her pregnant proves something? Here's another picture of a pregnant Governor.

But still. The mother/grandmother thing is really, really dumb. There's no way to frame that kind of foolishness that doesn't make the accuser look worse than the accused.
posted by dirtdirt at 3:55 AM on September 1, 2008


dirtdirt, I find that it helps if one looks at a link before commenting on it. It isn't a picture at all... it's a flow chart of sorts.

I hope my advice helps you avoid future on-line embarrassments.
posted by chuckdarwin at 4:10 AM on September 1, 2008


Thanks for going out of your way, Chuck.
posted by dirtdirt at 4:20 AM on September 1, 2008


she's way over her head.

I'm becoming more and more convinced that this is true. She didn't have any idea when she accepted the job what it would mean. If the vetting reports are true, John McCain's one of the most incompetent presidential nominees in modern history.

I'd be inclined to think she's another Eagleton, destined to drop out of the race before November, but then who could McCain possibly convince to join the ticket. Word is that Pawlenty and Romney are pissed because they feel strung along, Huckabee's pissed because he wasn't even vetted (which doesn't exclude him from being picked, apparently!) and I can't imagine that after this trainwreck and after seeing Pawlenty get the rug pulled out from under him, anyone remotely credible is going to take McCain's calls. Maybe Rudy Guiliani is still available.
posted by EarBucket at 5:04 AM on September 1, 2008


The Times of London sums up this entire MeFi thread in 1/87th the space, here and here. (Yes, including the baby weirdness, which is now officially mainstream I guess.)
posted by rokusan at 5:31 AM on September 1, 2008


For even more baby weirdness, via Deceiver there's a comment on this thread (see Sue Williams, at 12:31:50) saying that the baby is Sarah's but that Bristol is in fact pregnant and married her high school boyfriend over the summer:
It has come out in the past couple of days that she and her high school boyfriend had a quickie wedding and that she is home schooling her senior year. The Anchorage Daily News has known about this for months - and haven’t touched the story.
The rabid desire for someone in Palin's family - anyone! - to have failed to meet the standards of the conservative chastity brigade is pretty phenomenal.
posted by DarlingBri at 5:52 AM on September 1, 2008


Palin on energy.
posted by konolia at 6:33 AM on September 1, 2008


It does occur to me that the GOP vice-presidential candidate's having a developmentally disabled child is somewhat reminiscent of 1980.

posted by the duck by the oboe at 6:46 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


The rabid desire for someone in Palin's family - anyone! - to have failed to meet the standards of the conservative chastity brigade is pretty phenomenal.

Have you not been paying attention?

Haven't you noticed that the folks who are obsessed with policing other people's morality are more likely than average to misstep themselves?

How many Baptist preachers auto-asphyxiating themselves will it take for you to notice this? How many writers-about-Moral-Virtues-with-gambling- habits? How many anti-gay senators with vice squad arrests? How many priests fiddling altar boys? How many anti-abortion advocates who had to elope because they themselves were knocked up?

This is now a basic principle of American politics: the conservatives are obsessed with sexual behavior and with reproductive issues for personal reasons.

If somebody tells you: "I worry all the time about what other people get up to", they might as well be confessing to having something in their own closet.
posted by AsYouKnow Bob at 6:49 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


The most interesting thing I learned from this thread:

global is the new canadian.
posted by ericbop at 7:04 AM on September 1, 2008


Haven't you noticed that the folks who are obsessed with policing other people's morality are more likely than average to misstep themselves?
Where is the evidence that Palin's daughter is obsessed with policing other people's morality?
posted by davar at 7:09 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Haven't you noticed that the folks who are obsessed with policing other people's morality are more likely than average to misstep themselves?

i've noticed that this obsession is spreading all over the political spectrum - this thread is proof of that - you claim that they're obsessed with your morality - but people here are so obsessed, they'll make shit up

amazing

a pox on both tribes of the moral police, conservative and liberal
posted by pyramid termite at 7:10 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


If Obama had the power to stop them, he'd be responsible for them, but he doesn't and he's not.

The rules that apply to Democrats do not apply to Republicans. Obama will be blamed for this shit, and it will hurt his campaign.
posted by dirigibleman


That's because the Democrat party is a bottom-up organization and the Republican party is a top-down organization.
posted by Balisong at 7:26 AM on September 1, 2008


Haven't you noticed that the folks who are obsessed with policing other people's morality are more likely than average to misstep themselves?

Exactly. Their subconscious game is to get people to say to each other how normal or righteous they must be, and only then does their own confusion or guilt subside.
posted by Brian B. at 7:27 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


"I AM telling you that a lot of people I know really do see him as an extreme leftist whether or not that is where Democrats think he fits on the political spectrum."

Well, maybe you could take a brief moment to correct them, konolia. If it's really just abortion that you differ with him on, you could point that out and let people know that you, a Republican, knows that he's not a communist and that such charges are baseless and make people look stupid when they claim them.

(The "Who is babby former?" question is kinda dumb as a campaign tactic, but it's fun drama.)
posted by klangklangston at 7:39 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


But more importantly, CNN's other polls show the race to be Obama 49% to McCain 48%. When your VP candidate is actually lagging behind the ticket as a whole, she's hurting the ticket. The whole point of a VP is to shore up a ticket, to increase its market share.

National polls don't mean shit unless you're picking an American Idol winner. Until the electoral college system is changed or states give their electoral votes proportionally, the national polls are nothing more than a popularity contest.

Last I saw in Ohio it is a dead even tie with a huge undecided. That poll was before the Palin announcement, but this is exactly what happened in 2004. The only difference is there is no Ken Blackwell to come along and do things like throw out voter registrations printed on the wrong weight of paper and all that other bullshit. All they need to do is suppress a few Obama votes and have a massive evangelical/fundamentalist/anti-choice turnout and McCain wins.

Changing undecideds in California or Texas wasn't the plan here. It is the swing state strategy. Look at the map. It is about changing the toss up leaning republican states pink and/or taking away Obama toss up states.

Of course Rove's plan could backfire. Or the democrats can shoot themselves in the foot. It ain't over.
posted by birdherder at 7:52 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


delmoi writes "Birth Certificates are sealed for 100 years in Alaska (It's sad that I even know this). No one has accused her of faking his birth certificate. Jesus. "

Sorry. I thought birth records were public in which case, if this crazy rumour were true, someone would have had to falsify the record to have any hope of successfully passing off the deception.
posted by Mitheral at 7:54 AM on September 1, 2008


dawson: Probably you haven't even read one book about him, but he's sorta not someone to make fun of. Damn, people in the states really are mostly stupid, callous and egocentric.

Believe it or not, I was quite aware of Stockdale's history prior to posting my comment, and while he's an admirable guy I categorically disagree that poking a little (very mild) fun at him is inappropriate. Stockdale's debate performance was this weird cultural touchstone for about 5 minutes back in 1992, which is what I was referring to. Chillax.
posted by the_bone at 7:57 AM on September 1, 2008


This choice in VPs is but an extention of America's fascination with feel-good movies where the hero goes up against great odds and overcomes The Establishment in a folksy way.--Rocky, Dave, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington--and our inability to distinguish the difference between fact and fiction--the Bush Administration.

Picture what a hit movie a certain segment of our population is envisioning:

Angelina Jolie plays the title character in the action/adventure thriller, Sarah!. She's your average Alaskan mom who gets mad enough about corruption that she runs for mayor of her little town and cleans house. (All the while, baking cookies, taking care of her family and snowshoeing through the wilderness.) Corruption on a state level forces her to run for governor to again clean house. (Still baking cookies, splinting the occasional broken arm and--to show the tough side of her compassion--shooting the family malamute when it is injured.)

Presidential elections come along and a likeable older candidate (Wilford Brimley??) goes to Alaska and begs her to be his running mate as only she can clean up Washington the way she has Alaska. (Maybe here we can have a tear-jerky scene of her talking to her son--who is headed for Iraq--and saying that they both have missions to accomplish and that they will meet again when they've made the world safe for Democracy.)

A brief couple of scenes where the scary black guy liberal candidate (Denzel in his Training Day mode?) and his minions start rumors about Sarah's oldest daughter. Daughter cries and Mom explains that she should hold her head high and know that they should prevail because God is on their side.

President What's-His-Name and Sarah win the election and within days the president is stricken by a heart attack. His last words to his VP are, "You epitomize Goodness--with the grace of God, carry on my legacy." Then he croaks.

Scenes of Son (find a new Brad Pitt-type to play him) in Iraq--his entire unit pinned down by sniper fire. It looks bad until his mother's voice-over says, "We'll meet again when we've made the world safe for Democracy. You have a mission to accomplish," and suddenly he has the power! Single-handedly, he kills the scary jihadists and saves his entire unit! Everyone is in awe and Congress calls him home so that they can bi-parisanly pin the Congressional Medal of Honor on his chest.

But suddenly there's a crisis with Russia! Over something that the Russian premiere misunderstands! Sarah gets him to come to America for one last talk before the nukes start flying and she, the premiere, and one liberal reporter are flying in Air Force One over the Rockies because...because...okay, you gotta work with me here 'cuz I got nothing, but it doesn't matter because Air Force One goes down in the Rockies! In a blizzard! Everyone is killed except Sarah, the Russian, and the liberal reporter who has a broken leg. Sarah grabs the gun from the dead Secret Service guy and shoots the reporter to put him out of his misery like she did with the family's malamute. No, wait! It's a broken arm and she splints it, earning the gratitude of the liberal press forever. Then she gets both the Premiere and the reporter to a deserted cabin just before Air Force One explodes!

Teams of government agents try a rescue but the mountains are to blizzardy for an air rescue. The only way to get to the President is straight up the mountain on a snowmobile--but who's crazy enough and brave enough to do that? Sarah's husband (Matt Damon?) is the only one with the guts and the experience to do that but how can he rescue all of them with just one snowmobile? Son suddenly appears by his dad's side and says, "Why would I go to congress for some stupid medal when mom needs me?" and they go roaring off on their snowmobiles where they jump ice chasms and encounter all sorts of deadly weather- and mountain-related stuff. Finally, when everyone has given up on finding the President alive, the First Family men reach the cabin and go inside to find Sarah serving mooseburgers. (She shot a moose and chopped the burgers herself while the liberal reporter cowers in fear. Maybe there's an avalanche or something coming.)

Well, the mooseburgers are enough to convince the Russian Premiere that America is really good so he calls off the Cold War. Mom pins the Congressional Medal of Freedom on Son's chest while the entire Congress (even the scary black guy who ran against her) cheer. Not a dry eye in the house (or senate.)

Sarah and hubby look at each other proudly and then one of them says, "That was great! We should have more babies!" Fade out as they walk hand-in-hand away from the camera.

..........................................

So that's what the American public's Hollywood idea of this VP pick is. In Real Life, however, it will not wendell.
posted by leftcoastbob at 8:18 AM on September 1, 2008 [30 favorites]


Angelina Jolie plays the title character in the action/adventure thriller, Sarah!.

That whore? No. Amy Grant in her big-screen debut.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 8:46 AM on September 1, 2008


Reuters: Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant
posted by jocelmeow at 8:59 AM on September 1, 2008


This seems interesting, too. It appears Palin has ties to the Alaskan Independence Party, a right-fringe group with the ultimate goal of seceding from the US.
posted by EarBucket at 9:02 AM on September 1, 2008


From jocelmeow's link:

"The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama's name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their 'campaign of change,'" a senior aide said.

What does, "some even with Barack Obama's name in them" mean?
posted by leftcoastbob at 9:07 AM on September 1, 2008


Palin is gunning for the 18m women who voted for Hillary Clinton

Considering that the Times article featured a photo of Palin looking down the barrel of a badass rifle, they might want to reword that.
posted by lukemeister at 9:09 AM on September 1, 2008


Ugh, seventeen years old and keeping the baby? This will appeal to the white trash wing of the party, no doubt.
posted by jayder at 9:09 AM on September 1, 2008


Reuters: Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant

The fact that this makes me giggle and titter means I'm a bad person. I accept that.
posted by ColdChef at 9:13 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


What does, "some even with Barack Obama's name in them" mean?

It means that we've been giving Rove and his buddies great material to smear Obama with. Congratulations all around.
posted by klausness at 9:32 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Good going, DailyKos! Now the McCain campaign can harp on how tawdry and prurient and privacy-invading all liberals are! I maintain we should have left this whole mess to the National Enquirer.

(Though I don't believe for a minute that McCain knew, as the story says ... they would have mentioned that within the first day if that were true.)

Now can we focus on Palin's policies, public statements, and political history? THINK OF THE BABY WOLVES.
posted by lisa g at 9:33 AM on September 1, 2008


What does, "some even with Barack Obama's name in them" mean?

I believe in this context it means Barack Obama is a celebrity closet muslim antichrist baby-killing communist who thinks so much of himself that he has the gall to be mentioned on blogs of unaffiliated rumor mongers.
posted by effwerd at 9:34 AM on September 1, 2008


Palin don't preach, I'm in trouble deep.
posted by ColdChef at 9:36 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


What does, "some even with Barack Obama's name in them" mean?

It is supposed to insinuate that Barack Obama somehow had a hand in spreading the rumor.
You see, a casual observer might misread it as "Obama's name on them", meaning that he is the author of those despicable rumors. But what it actually says is "Obama's name in them", so that's technically true even if he is only mentioned in no connection whatsoever to those rumors.
That senior aide is a really smart bastard, isn't he?

What I don't get is, why doesn't the so-called liberal media call them out for this shit? This is the New York Times, for crying out loud. Don't they have any self-respecting journalists left there? "Wait a minute, when you say 'with Barack Obama's name in them', do you mean that Obama personally is responsible for these rumors? Or his team? Who exactly? Do you have any proof for these allegations?" It can't be that difficult, can it?
posted by sour cream at 9:38 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Now the McCain campaign can harp on how tawdry and prurient and privacy-invading all liberals are!

Well, that's a nice break from being traitors, terrorist-sympathizers and communists.
posted by empath at 9:40 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


"...in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy..."

Hey, y'all are famous! Way to go, a first paragraph mention too.

Jerks.
posted by damo at 9:42 AM on September 1, 2008


Reuters: Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant

The funniest part about all of this happening on a holiday is that I'm home during the daytime, and you can flip back and forth between the news and Jerry Springer reruns and they're exactly the fucking same.

Is this My Fair Lady or some shit? Is John McCain making a fucking bet with someone?
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 9:42 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


Well, that's a nice break from being traitors, terrorist-sympathizers and communists.

Yeah, I can only do that so many hours a day.
posted by lukemeister at 9:43 AM on September 1, 2008


Uhm, wtf is a PUMA, please?

Ditto for "VPILF." Color me clueless: until now I'd thought it must have meant "Vice President, In Like Flynn"...
posted by skyper at 9:43 AM on September 1, 2008


Oh and farther down:
"what one aide called "mud-slinging and lies" circulating on liberal blog sites. "

Man, sure showed them a lesson! Not just giving them sound bite fodder, nope, nuh-uh.

What high road? Did we miss the exit?
posted by damo at 9:45 AM on September 1, 2008


Again, we aren't the ones who put her kids out there as one of her qualifications to be VP, and how she's a great mom and a family woman. She did. She chose to put her children in the spotlight, knowing there was a scandal bubbling under the service.
posted by empath at 9:45 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


And you chose to wallow down in the muck, to dredge it out. Look you what you did to our nice white carpet!
posted by damo at 9:47 AM on September 1, 2008


What does, "some even with Barack Obama's name in them" mean?

It means, conveniently, that some comments about the crazy-baby-madness were posted on sites or blogs like barack-is-the-new-black.com or obamas-yo-momma.org or whatever. It's a disingenious way to link Obama to it, but one that should be expected.

What a fascinating weekend!
posted by rokusan at 9:47 AM on September 1, 2008


The Violet Blue story popped up on Memorial Day weekend, and now this on Labor Day weekend. I can't imagine what Thanksgiving Day will be like.
posted by lukemeister at 9:52 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


No Palin tag?
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 9:54 AM on September 1, 2008


Haven't you noticed that the folks who are obsessed with policing other people's morality are more likely than average to misstep themselves?

Well, they're projecting.

The baby weirdness is just... weird... and I still think there's something fishy there... somewhere. (What was with that eight hour flight, etc.) but as above I don't think it's what Dem types should be focusing on. Just leave Larry Flynt a message and move on to more substantial issues.

What really caught my interest here was Palin's devout image. Reflexively, this makes me suspect her of shenanigans, though I don't know what kind of shenanigans yet. Anyone who describes herself as having "eye-popping integrity" sets off my hypocrisy klaxons.

That is, I would not lend this person money.
posted by rokusan at 9:54 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Reuters: Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant

It just keeps coming with this person. I could make a comment about how all of this wouldn't be a big deal if it was all dealt with and put behind her months ago, which would have happened if McCain had seriously tried to vet her. She probably wouldn't have been picked, but even if she was we wouldn't be hearing all of this for the first time. Oh well.

The fact that this makes me giggle and titter means I'm a bad person. I accept that.

Hah, but it proves me right about the other baby! Bristol can't be the mother of Trig, if she's pregnant with another baby.

Still the fact that the first paragraph in a New York Times article (reprinted from Reuters) is this
ST. PAUL, Sept 1 (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.
Has me laughing my ass off. It's like some bizarre parody.
posted by delmoi at 9:55 AM on September 1, 2008


rumors by liberal bloggers...
Hey, y'all are famous! Way to go, a first paragraph mention too.

Wait a minute... almost everyone here agreed that this wasn't something the Dems should be talking about.

But now we're supposed to feel to blame for this somehow? Now we're not supposed to even talk about talking about what other sites on the web are talking about?

WTF is MetaFilter for again?
posted by rokusan at 9:57 AM on September 1, 2008


Palin's Daughter is Pregnant
posted by mrzarquon at 9:59 AM on September 1, 2008


I mean, the media narrative on her is now going to be that she's a backwoods, white trash hillbilly. Her husband has a DUI, her brother-in-law tasered her step-son, her husband sits in on policy meetings, her teen daughter is knocked up.

McCain just destroyed the GOP. 48 state landslide on the way, folks. She's not going to last a month, and he's going to have to go with his back-up pick -- probably Pawlenty or Romney (Don't think that they aren't angling right now to push her out -- both of them are reported to be incredibly pissed off at being used by the campaign).
posted by empath at 10:00 AM on September 1, 2008


For those not putting the numbers together, by the way, this means Palin will be a grandmother at 44, with a grandchild less than a year younger than her own son.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:00 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


The Secretive Right-Wing Cabal That Met In Minneapolis To Vet Palin
posted by homunculus at 10:01 AM on September 1, 2008


Holy fuck, from Andrew Sullivan:
So that explains the wedding ring I spotted. From the Palin family ... Now all we need is confirmation from the obstetrician who delivered Sarah's baby, Trig.
And from another post
Now they've cleared the air on this - and good for them - what harm would it do to release the medical records showing that Sarah Palin delivered Trig on April 18 in Wasilla? This is not hard: there must be an obstetrician, medical records, and data that can easily refute this rumor. It is not out of the ordinary either: candidates routinely issue medical records. So let's have them. And then we can move on.
He can't give this crazy rumor up. What the hell would be the point in her faking a pregnancy at this point?
posted by delmoi at 10:02 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I don't see any reason to buy that Sarah Palin faked her pregnancy. That's just goofy. But McCain knew? Wow. The anti-abortion voters I know (Hi, Mom) are also veeeery anti-pre-marital-sex. This isn't going to make her vote Democratic, but I think it'll keep some people home in disgust.
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 10:02 AM on September 1, 2008


oh shit, thats me being stupid eh? guess I need some more coffee.
posted by mrzarquon at 10:02 AM on September 1, 2008


You don't have enough of a paranoid imagination delmoi-- maybe bristol is no longer pregnant, and they're planning on announcing a miscarriage next month, which would shut down any further press investigation of the trig birth. That's just off the top of my head.
posted by empath at 10:05 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Wow, I'm going to enjoy the tap dancing the evangelicals do over this. And what a relief for her mother, who's going to be so busy campaigning for a while. I mean, her daughter's already pregnant, so what other kind of shenanigans could she get into?
posted by fuse theorem at 10:06 AM on September 1, 2008


I only wish this had come out later. Pre-convention, it's much smaller news if McCain decides to nominate someone else (after Palin "withdraws").
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 10:06 AM on September 1, 2008


I'm said this in the deleted thread, but it bears repeating:

GOP reps have said McCain knew about this beforehand. He didn't do any of the other research, but he knew his future VP running made who was religiously right-wing had an unmarried, pregnant 17-year-old daughter.

McCain is, quite literally, losing his mind.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:06 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Cabal?
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 10:07 AM on September 1, 2008


Further, they'll probably blame it on liberal bloggers and the Obama campaign causing stress. Not enough to claim that democrats love abortion, but they'll also say they can cause one through sheer force of will.

If you think that's too low for the Republicans, then you haven't been in this country for the past 8 years.
posted by empath at 10:07 AM on September 1, 2008


The NY Post screams:
"PALIN ADMITS HER 17-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER IS PREGNANT"
From the article:
""The despicable rumors that have been spread by liberal blogs, some even with Barack Obama's name in them, is a real anchor around the Democratic ticket, pulling them down in the mud in a way that certainly juxtaposes themselves against their 'campaign of change,'" a senior aide said."

I believe it's easy to see why people care about this story:

1. If the party in question had run their business in a less shady fashion, they wouldn't appear to have so much to hide, making any crazy possibility seem feasible.
2. If the party in question weren't so judgmental of others having made simple mistakes or even gross mistakes without solving their own issues first, they could more reasonably be offended.
3. If the party in question hadn't just spent more than two decades telling everyone else how to run their lives and spending the last 8 years (at minimum) making their wacky opinions into draconian, senseless, and frighteningly ignorant policies and laws, this would look less like something folks should bring up to prove they are human and, more importantly, that their policies and wacky opinions don't work in real life.
4. If the party in question had managed to keep their policies, platforms, and actions humane and aimed at ultimate civic responsibility...well, then maybe we'd be so busy solving real problems, crap like this wouldn't even be a blip on the radar.

People don't like hypocrites, liars, obfuscators, the greedy, and the power-mad...particularly when they have been trying to put people under a giant thumb for a while and some have already started to feel the pressure. Anything that makes a tormentor appear human because of a flaw in the tormentor's ability to live a life meeting their own requirements of others is more likely to stir up negative response than positive.

That said, no matter what I feel for the Oldster and his Harridan (or the Dreamer and his Censor), the young woman doesn't need any of those who disagree with her mother's policies, actions, or candidacy to judge her and we could show a lot of strength of character by giving her the kindness of privacy and understanding.

It won't happen, but an excellent outcome to come out of this (aside from a healthy baby born into a loving family) would be for Palin to re-think her opinions and beliefs a bit and soften towards the rest of the humanity and its right to live in a less polluted, resource-stripped world where liberty and privacy are respected even by our government.

I do wonder how her parents reacted when she told them, considering Gov. Palin's policy on pre-marital sex and keeping young people contained, but that's just a flight of fancy
posted by batmonkey at 10:08 AM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


This should disqualify Palin from holding national office.

I mean, how can the people of our nation expect her to handle all of the deception and deceit required of a modern Republican VP when she can't even keep a knocked-up 17-year old under wraps?
posted by a young man in spats at 10:09 AM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


leet hacking skillz
posted by Artw at 10:11 AM on September 1, 2008


delmoi,

Andrew Sullivan has the head cheerleader for the Iraq war before he was against it, so I don't think his judgment is the best. I wish I could remember his quote before the war about people who opposed it.
posted by lukemeister at 10:11 AM on September 1, 2008


I only wish this had come out later. Pre-convention, it's much smaller news if McCain decides to nominate someone else

But he'd look completely idiotic if he did that. Of course he looks pretty idiotic right now as well. But picking a VP and then dumping her makes you look completely unprepared to be president, which had been what McCain's entire campaign had been about.
posted by delmoi at 10:15 AM on September 1, 2008


Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant

SEX OUT OF WEDLOCK!!!!

No wonder my five-foot tall crucified Jesus statue was crying tears of blood this morning.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 10:15 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


um, was the head cheerleader
posted by lukemeister at 10:15 AM on September 1, 2008


I still think they'll have her enlisted-on-9/11 deployed-on-9/11 son end up dying in Iraq, while her daughter is appearing on the trail pregnant, and she can talk about both and she can try to endear herself to people.

They're going to go with something emotional, not mental. Something like fear, or empathy, or the like. Something that hits you and stays with people long enough that the republicans win.
posted by cashman at 10:16 AM on September 1, 2008


What's the age of consent in Alaska?
posted by ColdChef at 10:16 AM on September 1, 2008


The Alaska age of consent laws are unique. The age of consent in Alaska is 16. This is the age at which an individual may consent to have sex with someone over 18, legally, in Alaska. It applies both to heterosexual and homosexual acts.
posted by ColdChef at 10:19 AM on September 1, 2008


The age of consent is 16, provided the older partner is not in a position of authority.
posted by lukemeister at 10:20 AM on September 1, 2008


cashman- they should just cut out the middle man, and deploy her pregnant daughter to Iraq instead.
posted by mrzarquon at 10:20 AM on September 1, 2008


"what one aide called "mud-slinging and lies" circulating on liberal blog sites. "

This is kind of a strange way for McCain's people to characterize it.

Basically, they are saying, "Contrary to what the malicious, evil liberal bloggers have been saying, Bristol Palin was not pregnant then, she is pregnant now."

Their response to it is like saying, "Contrary to malicious, false reports that I beat my wife last year, the truth is that I beat her just last night."
posted by jayder at 10:23 AM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


Sarah Palin: "I'd oppose abortion even if my daughter was raped."
posted by empath at 10:25 AM on September 1, 2008


As a conservative-leaning independent, I've been giving serious consideration to voting for Obama. But if it puts me on the same side as some of people posting here, I think I'd rather stay home.
posted by Fuzzy Skinner at 10:26 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


FFF: McCain was already going to win the south. Even if every Republican in the country votes for McCain, he still loses. He has to get democrats and independents, who are generally not backwoods hillbillies.
posted by empath at 10:26 AM on September 1, 2008


I think the most difficult issue will be figuring our a better name than "Trig Paxson Van Palin." This kid's gonna sound like he's a member of Dethklok.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:26 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


The McCain aide insisted a key point to keep in mind is that Bristol decided to keep the baby, a decision "supported by her parents.
Does anybody else find it odd that they insist that this is a decision? Decision implies choice, right?
posted by davar at 10:29 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


I have to wonder if her announcement today isn't a prelude to her dropping out of the race to "spend more time with her family." It might be the smart play, although I still don't know who McCain could possibly tap to replace her.
posted by EarBucket at 10:30 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


rokusan: sorry I just didn't feel like typing out the names of each jerk poster individually. I assumed that people to whom the statement obviously didn't apply wouldn't get their panties in a bunch.
posted by damo at 10:31 AM on September 1, 2008


"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support," the Palins said.

That's sweet. Does this mean she grew up so fast not to have the birds and bees talk? If "savin' it for marriage" is only way to go, how on earth could this happen? Right. God's will.

Look, I'm happy the daughter could talk to her parents about being pregnant and she didn't have to go to an abortionist like Obama to terminate the pregnancy. I'm glad governor and first dude didn't kick the little tramp out onto the street after learning she was knocked up. That's the way it should work.

But I'm not surprised because it happens all the time. Just not to governors that are VP candidates. This is also, had the rumors been true about Palin faking being pregnant to protect the honor of her virginal daughter, wouldn't surprise me. That is how families like the Pailins roll.

But it would have been better (and frankly better for the fundamentalist ideology) had Bristol remained a virgin like a "good girl". Or if she had to fuck tell the father to wear a condom. Then again, did these kids even know what condoms are? Are they like the kids I grew up with that got notes to be out of sex ed that thought if you did it standing up (or the first time, or in a hot tub or the millions of other myths), you couldn't get pregnant? Then again Bristol may have wanted to be pregnant considering her mom made it look so fun.

And yes, this is going to whip "the base" into even more excitement over Palin. The only thing that could make this better if McCain announces his daughter is pregnant and keeping her baby too. And that Karl Rove's old office in the West Wing will be made into a nursery.

Life Happens.
posted by birdherder at 10:33 AM on September 1, 2008


I guess if I've learned anything in this thread it's that I'm a Scots-Irish beer-swilling white-trash redneck Joe Sixpack fundy daydream believer after all. And damn proud of it besides.
posted by dawson at 10:34 AM on September 1, 2008


Frankly, I don't see having a pregnant 17 year old daughter as a detriment. So she's dealing with the same stuff every other family does (only, unlike the yuppies around here, she's not arm twisting her daughter into getting an abortion). Where's the negative?

And quit it with the "trailer-trash"es and "hillbilly talk". It's ignorant and prejudice and makes you look worse than anyone you're attempting to insult.
posted by small_ruminant at 10:35 AM on September 1, 2008 [11 favorites]


Fuzzy Skinner:
"But if it puts me on the same side as some of people posting here, I think I'd rather stay home."

Why? If you were voting for what's best for the country, why does it matter who it seems you're siding with on a website that leans dramatically toward sarcasm and questioning authority?
posted by batmonkey at 10:35 AM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


1500!
posted by interrobang at 10:36 AM on September 1, 2008


Reuters: Palin Says Daughter is Pregnant

Well, what else is there to do in Alaska?
posted by ThePinkSuperhero at 10:36 AM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


i'm glad to see you all supporting a woman's right to privacy in her own body unless, of course, her mother is running for vp

sept 1, 2008 - the day many metafilter liberals revealed themselves to be as nasty, hypocritical and overly concerned with other people's "morality" as their opponents - even to the point where some of them made stuff up
posted by pyramid termite at 10:38 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Has anyone made a "Juneau" joke yet?
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 10:42 AM on September 1, 2008 [11 favorites]


leans dramatically toward sarcasm and questioning authority?

This particular thread is turning out to be less questioning authority and sarcasm, as it is about classism at its most disgusting, contempt for anyone with a different point of view, and unseemly prurient interest in the guise of "won't somebody please think of the country," which is a tactic historically associated with the right wing and reviled by the left.
posted by small_ruminant at 10:43 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


pyramid termite:
You're ignoring many who are supporting the young woman's right to privacy in order to make an accusation of unfairness (which appears somewhat histrionic, I must say).

Also, libertarians are not liberals; independents are not liberals. Very few liberals are actually liberal, but that's a whole 'nother monkey.
posted by batmonkey at 10:43 AM on September 1, 2008


Does anybody else find it odd that they insist that this is a decision? Decision implies choice, right?

davar, no, I do not find it odd. Alaska does not have a parental consent law. Bristol could have had an abortion had she wanted one and been able to access a clinic*. She certainly had a choice, even if having an abortion is a choice she never would have made.

And, again, use of the term "choice" is a dog whistle to conservatives. Between the teen mom and Downs baby, these people are hitting the Right to Life trifecta. All we need to do is knock up Todd.

*I believe there are two clinics in all of Alaska - one in Anchorage and possibly one if Fairbanks. I'd be delighted to be wrong, though.
posted by DarlingBri at 10:44 AM on September 1, 2008


(Thank you, pyramid termite, for saying it better.)
posted by small_ruminant at 10:44 AM on September 1, 2008


I don't think there's anything wrong with the family at all. Shit happens. I didn't choose to put the family out in front of the country and stand them up as a qualification for the Vice Presidency. Politics ain't bean bag. If her family is a mess, and she knows fuck-all about foreign policy, and politicians in her own state say she's a lousy governor, and she's under investigation for corruption, why is she on the ticket again?
posted by empath at 10:45 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


i heart you small ruminant
posted by dawson at 10:46 AM on September 1, 2008


Sarah and Todd Palin: We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby

(emphasis mine)

You mean she had a choice?
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 10:46 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Not that it matters, now, in the scheme of things, but I'm not buying that McCain (or even Palin) knew about this ahead of the VP announcement. The rumor Palin is trying to rebut with this announcement has been going around for months, and she and her advisers had to know it was going to get play; why not settle it right away and put it all on the table to start with? Were they waiting to see if the hurricane was going to hit in hopes of blunting the effects of the story? And why would McCain go for her given that this story undermines his strategy for picking her in the first place?
posted by troybob at 10:46 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Ugh, seventeen years old and keeping the baby? This will appeal to the white trash wing of the party, no doubt.


Ironic. Obama's mother also got knocked up and then married at 18. Does that appeal to left wing trash maybe?

Dumb comment, Jaydar. Maybe you feel clever stereotyping poorer whites? No doubt.

And what makes some of you assume that the evangelicals will abandon the ticket in droves now that news of the daughter's pregnancy is out? They don't all necessarily react that way. I knew of a pastor's young unmarried daughter who got pregnant and this Brooklyn church (w/thousands of members) knew about it and helped---i.e., contributed money towards the baby, offered moral/emotional support. How dare they not stone her? Some of you haven't a clue.

The uglier this gets, the angrier/more protective the right will get ---and they will look for even more personal dirt on Obama/Biden. And you can't say shit as you took the low road on this crap.
posted by clon7 at 10:47 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


In other words, the only people who actually could have made a decision to protect Bristol's privacy were her parents. If they cared that much about her, she should have turned down the vice-presidency.
posted by empath at 10:47 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


By putting a not ready for national politics Fundie into a sure-loss race, Karl gets to: further fuck over McCain, and demonstrate to any other potential maverick that mavericks get knee-capped; throw a sop to the Fundies; and keep the Fundies hating "the Libs" over the 2008 loss, rather than questioning what the Republicans are really doing for Fundie goals.

That's a nice theory, and I'd love to believe it was true that Rove and his ilk are sitting this one out, and are instead playing mind games with the Fundies, but I really, really doubt it. Their motivation is to protect their (business) interests, period. McCain is much more likely to do this than Obama. I find it really hard to believe that the likes of Karl Rove is dusting off his hands and saying, "Welp, we're going to lose this one, oh well, better luck in 2012." Does Rove really strike you as the type to roll over like that?

The Fundies were a huge factor in cinching the razor thin margins between Bush and Gore, then Kerry, and are pretty much the only group that can do the same for McCain. Rove and his minions on the McCain team want their vote. Badly. Hence the dog whistle "Obama is the Antichrist" ads, hence Palin. These are people who have consistently proven that they can and will do whatever it takes to win, time and time again, and as likely as it is, it is far from a foregone conclusion that Obama will win. Rove knows this, Team McCain knows this, and they're counting on the Fundies to make it happen, this November.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 10:48 AM on September 1, 2008


So how's that abstinence-only sex education working out for you there, Sarah?
posted by leftcoastbob at 10:48 AM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


In an alternate universe, John McCain would be joking, right now, that the father of Bristol Obama's child is Janet Reno.
posted by Flunkie at 10:48 AM on September 1, 2008


McCain-Juneau turns McCain-Juno.
posted by phrontist at 10:49 AM on September 1, 2008


You're ignoring many who are supporting the young woman's right to privacy

by dragging her family through the gutter - what's next? - reaching out to middle america by calling them white trash and hillbillies?

oh, never mind, people have done that already ...
posted by pyramid termite at 10:49 AM on September 1, 2008


small_ruminant:
"it is about classism at its most disgusting, contempt for anyone with a different point of view, and unseemly prurient interest in the guise of "won't somebody please think of the country," which is a tactic historically associated with the right wing and reviled by the left."

On one hand, yes, there is definitely some hypocrisy going on here. But, as I said in a prior, lengthy comment, it's really very easy to see why.

People are imperfect and when people who have held themselves as being more perfect than the rest of the world are proven to be just like us in the most basic way possible, those who felt judged or fearful or unfairly restricted are going to produce a backlash.

Or, more simply: every action has an equal and opposite (although sometimes startlingly similar) reaction.

The same kind of thing gets pulled when it's the other party or supporters of said party. Do what the rest of us have to do and learn to ignore the venting and snark to find the core of truth and decency.
posted by batmonkey at 10:49 AM on September 1, 2008


that the father of Bristol Obama's child

Now wouldn't THAT be a delicious turn of events?
posted by empath at 10:50 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Two days ago, Palin's spokesperson didn't know Bristol was pregnant

But McCain did. After having met Palin once for fifteen minutes several months ago. And after having not done any basic vetting on her.

Uh huh.
posted by Flunkie at 10:53 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


As a 100% pro-Obama, pro-choice guy, I find the LOLhillbillies comments really tacky.
posted by lukemeister at 10:54 AM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


I hated Juno when I saw it and now I fear I'll be living 4 years of it.
posted by mazola at 10:54 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must be an evil fuck too but, I am incredibly happy that Palin's daughter is pregnant. This completely neutralizes any blow back to Obama from people speculating about her faking the pregnancy. Because to the low information voters Palin was supposed to appeal to the rumors and the real story are essentially the same. They are now going to go searching through the internet to figure out the nuances. All they are going to hear is that Palin let her 17 year old daughter get knocked up, and that the held back on this information until they were forced to talk about it because of rumors on the internet.

Palin is the gift that keeps on giving. What's next connections to fringe separatists parties, black face at a costume party, moose sex to add to the moose burgers? Right now I wouldn't be surprised by anything.
posted by afu at 10:55 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


batmonkey said:
libertarians are not liberals;
independents are not liberals.
Very few liberals are actually liberal,
but that's a whole 'nother monke
[eeeeeee]y <-- emphasis added

Off topic but if you sing that in a kind of sugary way, it sounds like the theme song for a wicked good sitcom.
posted by damo at 10:56 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Tinfoil hats on -

Here's an idea: what if the McCain VP team was in fact aware of Bristol's pregnancy and - from their underdog position - considered it a boon because of the punditry mess it would no doubt set in motion, allowing their side to be perceived as victims of a "vast left-wing conspiracy" fueled by the Sullivans and Kosbats of this world who just don't know when to drop an argument, thus producing an elaborate "reverse smear machine".

Cynical, I know.

Tinfoil hats off.
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 10:57 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I though Sullivan had some class about people's personal lives. Particularly after, when he was a gung-ho Bush supporter, leftist libs disclosed his very particular and specific sexual tastes along with corresponding 'dating' ads he had placed, incognito he assumed, on certain sites that allow people with fetish for only certain acts with a certain body type and race to 'interact'...
As I have stated on MeFi earlier in the year, Obama has my support and is the first pol I ever gave money too, but if he doesn't distance himself from this pronto and with obvious disgust I guess my admittedly worthless vote will be a write-in for Lieberman.
posted by dawson at 10:59 AM on September 1, 2008


Cillizza: Assessing the Political Impact of Bristol Palin's Pregnancy
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 10:59 AM on September 1, 2008


...and if you're looking for the next twist in this sordid tale, look to Juno II for a hint of what's to come.
posted by mazola at 10:59 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


small ruminant: Frankly, I don't see having a pregnant 17 year old daughter as a detriment. So she's dealing with the same stuff every other family does.

birdherder: And yes, this is going to whip "the base" into even more excitement over Palin. The only thing that could make this better if McCain announces his daughter is pregnant and keeping her baby too. And that Karl Rove's old office in the West Wing will be made into a nursery.

five fresh fish: The knocked-up teen daughter will be an overall win for Palin, not a detriment.

I agree with all these comments. The religious fundamentalist demographic, to whom the Palin pick is a blatant appeal, has a very tenuous hold on middle-class status, and these devout Christians have children and relatives who have babies out of wedlock, have brothers-in-law whose meth labs explode, husbands who get DUIs, and generally have very messy family lives. News of Palin's messy, white-trash family problems will appeal greatly to the segment of U.S. population that Palin was picked to appease, a population that finds it hard to relate to the charmed lives of former Harvard Law Review editors, etc.

The people who will be appalled by the out-of-wedlock child are the latte liberals like myself who see childbirth at 17 as an impediment to a young woman's higher academic career.
posted by jayder at 11:00 AM on September 1, 2008 [9 favorites]


Her husband has a DUI, her brother-in-law tasered her step-son, her husband sits in on policy meetings, her teen daughter is knocked up.

It sounds like the taser thing got brought up in the divorce proceedings (way later) just for sensationalism.

The rest of it- in what way is that the sole province of poor white? Do any of these things not happen to families of every socio-economic stripe? They do.

Of course, the more upper-middle you are, the more embarrassing it is and the less it gets out, especially if you're lucky and well connected.
posted by small_ruminant at 11:00 AM on September 1, 2008


Also, I emphatically agree about canning the "white trash" talk, and really any talk about reproductive organs. There are far, far too many working poor in this country who suffer due to this government's complete disregard for their struggles, too many women who die due to anti-choicers' hysterical concern for what women do with their own bodies, and the Democratic party I know is supposed to be on their side.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:01 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


let's sum it up - by jumping at the first hint of a scandal regarding palin and her daughter, many people have managed to make it look like "liberal bloggers" were spreading lies and scandal sheet type rumors, mostly because they were

you've taken a sheer mediocrity and turned her into a martyr and victim of malicious persecution - you've taken what was a slight negative for her campaign and turned it into "those nasty lefties will say anything to hurt people"

way to go

do us all a favor now - just shut the fuck up before you blow this election for all of us

on preview - yes, goodnewsfortheinsane, that may be just what mccain and company were plotting and some have fallen for it like bums on baloney sandwiches
posted by pyramid termite at 11:01 AM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


Palin's Daughter is Pregnant

what, again?
posted by quonsar at 11:02 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Democrats, you just got trolled. And you're falling all over yourselves to feed the troll.
damn it
posted by enn at 11:02 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


small_ruminant: "Frankly, I don't see having a pregnant 17 year old daughter as a detriment. So she's dealing with the same stuff every other family does (only, unlike the yuppies around here, she's not arm twisting her daughter into getting an abortion). Where's the negative?

And quit it with the "trailer-trash"es and "hillbilly talk". It's ignorant and prejudice and makes you look worse than anyone you're attempting to insult.
"

Who's twisting anyone's arm to get an abortion? That's one of the most ignorant comments so far in the thread.

And, no, Bristol didn't make a choice. Making a choice would involve admitting alternatives, and there just doesn't seem to be any way that she had one.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 11:03 AM on September 1, 2008


She certainly had a choice
I understand that, in the legal sense. But I live in a country where abortion is legal. Abortion is just not a big issue here. And still, if someone who is pro life gets knocked up they do not emphasize that they decided to keep the baby, because not "keeping the baby" was just never an option. If you stress that this is a decision (and they did the same with Palin's "decision" to keep Trig), in my opinion you also accept that the outcome could be different, that other people might decide otherwise or that in another situation you might have decided otherwise. But this could be cultural/language differences, because I see gnifti (also Dutch) picked out the exact same thing.
posted by davar at 11:04 AM on September 1, 2008


Does anybody else find it odd that they insist that this is a decision? Decision implies choice, right?

EXACTLY EXACTLY EXACTLY jesus christ can we please make them deal with the hideous hypocrisy in this canonizing of Sarah and Bristol for "deciding" or "choosing" to keep their precious babies - IT IS NOT A CHOICE FOR THEM. God makes the choice, that's IT. Can these people not see the sheer and utter idiocy of praising them for something that they HAD NO HAND IN.

It's like praising me for my selfless decision to take a shit every day. God bless me!

Unless, of course, they want to acknowledge that they DID and SHOULD have a choice, in which case - carry on.
posted by tristeza at 11:04 AM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


As a 100% pro-Obama, pro-choice guy, I find the LOLhillbillies comments really tacky.
I'm not sure if you are referring to my comment Lukem, but I was being totally rubber meets the road pure as the driven snow genuinely honest and serious with my statement.
posted by dawson at 11:05 AM on September 1, 2008


CNN: Todd Palin was arrested for DWI (a quarter century ago)
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 11:06 AM on September 1, 2008


Basically, they are saying, "Contrary to what the malicious, evil liberal bloggers have been saying, Bristol Palin was not pregnant then, she is pregnant now."

Right, cuz the malicious rumors had to do primarily with the idea that Palin's daughter might have gotten pregnant. Not that the candidate herself faked a pregnancy to cover it up.

Of course, the malice about Palin's daughter's pregnancy is coming out now (see examples above) but that has more to do with those posters' opinions than the opinion of McCain's spokesperson.
posted by torticat at 11:06 AM on September 1, 2008


Teen daughter of GOP VP pick is pregnant
posted by KokuRyu at 11:08 AM on September 1, 2008


do us all a favor now - just shut the fuck up before you blow this election for all of us

Oh come on, we're just rubber-necking at a carwreck at this point. It's a Jerry Springer episode. I don't think anybody is going to vote for McCain based on a what a bunch of random mefites are saying.
posted by empath at 11:11 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I hope you are all so very, very, proud of yourselves here.

Meanwhile Palin just raised 10 million dollars for the campaign since Friday.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And, hey, since you all brought it up, sometimes unmarried teen daughters get pregnant. And just like my daughter, this girl is planning to marry the father. Imagine that. Taking responsibility for your actions. Taking responsibility for a new life.


And, if any of you reading this know Obama personally, tell him I said this: That baby is not a punishment. My grandson was not a punishment. Responsibility is not a dirty word-and neither my daughter's life or this girl's life is over or ruined. It will just look a little different.

And to those of you who would like to use this to say Palin should step down, I say just as soon as every other single politician with a teenager who gets pregnant, or gets drunk, or uses drugs, or gets caught doing SOMETHING that many of us adults also did when we were that age-as soon as THEY all step down, you have a leg to stand on.


If Obama is any kind of man at all, I expect that before the day is out he will make a statement telling his supporters to grow the heck up and leave this alone.

Let's see if they are men and women enough to do it.
posted by konolia at 11:11 AM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


Hey guys, I heard Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant and that her husband has a DWI on his record. Did I miss anything here?
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 11:12 AM on September 1, 2008


dawson,
I wasn't responding to you.
*not beer-swillist*
posted by lukemeister at 11:14 AM on September 1, 2008


cool lukemeister, we are on the same page then. cheers.
posted by dawson at 11:16 AM on September 1, 2008


Hey, wait a minute. Weren't there other issues? Something about foreign policy or something?
posted by damo at 11:16 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


And, hey, since you all brought it up, sometimes unmarried teen daughters get pregnant. And just like my daughter, this girl is planning to marry the father. Imagine that. Taking responsibility for your actions.

And the really great thing is, she had a choice. Life in a democracy, instead of a theocracy. Imagine that.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:17 AM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


Right, cuz the malicious rumors had to do primarily with the idea that Palin's daughter might have gotten pregnant. Not that the candidate herself faked a pregnancy to cover it up.

Realistically, how is Palin faking a pregnancy to protect her daughter really a malicious rumor? It made sense, given that she didn't reveal the pregnancy until very late, never showed (even the flight attendants who assisted her on the day she gave birth didn't notice she was pregnant), and her daughter was out of school for months coinciding with Palin's pregnancy. Yes, it's a crazy rumor, and highly improbable, but even if it were true, it would speak well for Palin's character, that she would go to such lengths to protect her daughter.

It would be like candy to the religious right, for her to say, "I sought to protect my daughter from the stigma and public attention that would result from being pregnant out of wedlock, due to being the daughter of a prominent public official, and in consultation with our daughter, my husband and I decided that we would raise the child as our own." Absolutely no shame in that, so I really don't buy this as a malicious rumor at all, just an attempt to figure out the life of this woman we just heard about for the first time four days ago.
posted by jayder at 11:20 AM on September 1, 2008


konolia,
I pretty sure that's something Obama already knows and believes. I'm not claming by any means that he's divine, but a bit like the carpenter from Galilee, Barak has some followers who twist the stomach of observers into bitter, angry knots, driving them away from the message of the man.
posted by dawson at 11:20 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


Who's twisting anyone's arm to get an abortion?

How many middle or upper class, college bound women do you know who had kids when they were teenagers? Do you think this is because they didn't get pregnant? No. Their parents had a kind and loving talk (if she was lucky) in which it was explained that having a baby would mean ruining her life, and her family's lives, and probably the life of the baby, since she wouldn't be able to support it very well, having lost her chance to get into a good college, and meet the right people. (What's more, what about all the good she'll be able to do in the world if she goes ahead and gets that law/medical degree? Think of the Peace Corp work she'd be able to do!) By staying pregnant, she'll have to go to alternative high school and she'll lose all of her friends and turn into one of those food stamps people. Of course, they have complete faith in her to make the right decision. She's a smart girl, (and it would be such a shame for all that to go to waste, by the way!) If, by some chance, she decides to go ahead and have an abortion, she can use their doctor. They'll cover the bill. No one ever even needs to know.
posted by small_ruminant at 11:20 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


I don't agree with her often, but konolia really nailed it with her last comment.
posted by milarepa at 11:21 AM on September 1, 2008


if any of you reading this know Obama personally, tell him I said this: That baby is not a punishment.

I don't know him personally, but has he said anything like this? As far as I know, he's been off giving speeches on trade policy, employment and hurricanes. Babies weren't mentioned. And I believe that he is publically anti-abortion and pro-choice, which a lot of people (including myself) are.
posted by jb at 11:23 AM on September 1, 2008


2) Abortion is my litmus test. If you don't pass that with me, I won't bother to look at anything else, period.
posted by konolia at 4:28 PM on August 31


Why didn't your Republican President and your Republican Congress and your conservative-majority Supreme Court make abortion illegal sometime during the last seven years?

What makes you think McCain - who has no real history of fighting against legal abortion - will somehow act when Bush, the Republican Congress, and the conservative court have failed to do so?

Do you not realize that the Republican party wants abortion to be legal? And do you not know why? The Republican party wants - needs - legal abortion so every four years they can get you to come out and vote for their candidate.

Because if it weren't for that single issue, you would vote for the party that fights for prenatal care for mothers, for better healthcare for children, and for tax cuts for the poor and middle-class.
posted by Optimus Chyme at 11:23 AM on September 1, 2008 [53 favorites]


> If Obama is any kind of man at all, I expect that before the day is out he will make a statement telling his supporters to grow the heck up and leave this alone.

Are you implying that in the past his actions have proven he is 'not this sort of man'? Or that in anyway he would associate with these rumors or actively try to spread them?

You seem to be thinking that these statements coming out of the dailykos and other such liberal blogs are equivalent to talking points issued by the barack campaign, when in the past they have shown really no such overlap. It would be like claiming that McCain's ad's are being written by the people at Little Green Footballs.
posted by mrzarquon at 11:23 AM on September 1, 2008


Wow, small_ruminant, your 'twisting arms' seems to consist mostly of shitty scenarios in your head. It's not unreasonable for others to ask you to keep them there instead of using them to paint everyone else with.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 11:25 AM on September 1, 2008


Yes, providing young pregnant women with an accurate picture of the future should they carry the child to term is a terrible thing to do. Their parents should tell them that it's sunshine and lollipops to be a teenage mother, so that they can choose without bias.
posted by Pope Guilty at 11:26 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


This particular thread is turning out to be less questioning authority and sarcasm, as it is about classism at its most disgusting, contempt for anyone with a different point of view, and unseemly prurient interest in the guise of "won't somebody please think of the country," which is a tactic historically associated with the right wing and reviled by the left.

Oh, horseshit. I'm not going to be told by anyone that I'm feigning an actual concern for this country, and I'm not going to pretend that I think there's an equal "class" in people who don't believe in science and progress and letting people do what they want with their own bodies and sex lives and people who do. I'm not the one who thinks there should be a special class of citizens who are ordered by the government to submit their bodies to the will of a moral authority while giving asterisks to their own family. The sole reason she was picked as McCain's running mate was because of her personal devotion to a class of people who think they have the right to control everyone else's personal lives. And you dare- dare to say I've got the problem with contempt for other people?

I'm not going to pretend that Palin is some kind of cultural or intellectual equal to me, because she's fucking not, okay? She's incompetent, ignorant, and a hypocrite. And the idea of her being a heartbeat away from the presidency fucking scares me. But even in light of that, I simply cannot address it beyond mockery. Her candidacy doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.

I am thinking of the country and so should you because Christ almighty, John McCain sure isn't.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 11:26 AM on September 1, 2008 [31 favorites]


also this thread has been filled with people of all political stripes denouncing all of the rumours/stories about the personal lives of a candidate's family as distasteful and irrelevant.
posted by jb at 11:26 AM on September 1, 2008


The initial post on Daily Kos was by someone who had never posted a diary before. It's just as likely that it was posted by a Romney or Pawlenty operative as it was by a democratic operative.
posted by empath at 11:26 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


dawson: I'm not claming by any means that he's divine, but a bit like the carpenter from Galilee [...]

Let's not do this.
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 11:27 AM on September 1, 2008


As a conservative-leaning independent, I've been giving serious consideration to voting for Obama. But if it puts me on the same side as some of people posting here, I think I'd rather stay home.

What a marvelous, thoughtful way to decide something as important as your vote. Extrapolate that a few dozen posters on a snarky left-leaning website = an entire segment of the population being personally objectionable to you, and make the choice that will make them mad and make you appear to be above them!

Between nonsense like that and the spectacle of PUMAs having tantrums in the streets, it's pretty clear that November should just be renamed PettyGrudgeMonth.

Let's see if they are men and women enough to do it.

Hey, konolia, I missed the part where you showed you were woman enough to tell your fitness instructor that Obama is most certainly not a communist or a Muslim or a terrorist or any of the other claims you know to be false. Could you point me to it?
posted by scody at 11:27 AM on September 1, 2008 [33 favorites]


i'm glad to see you all supporting a woman's right to privacy in her own body unless, of course, her mother is running for vp

no, what I see is people enjoying the trainwreck of hypocrisy of moralistic politicians who slam sex education, condoms, and praise "abstinence" for cynical political gain while they don't realize that their daughters are fucking around without protection exposing their bodies to disease and unwanted pregnancies.

also, marrying your boyfriend at 17 because he knocked you up must not be the most mature and serene decision ever when it comes to choosing your life partner, and actually is very often conductive to divorce

but please keep blaming the libruls for being "mean" (unlike the nice Republicans who in perfect Dixie fashion have based their campaign on the idea that the Negro candidate is NOT AMERICAN) -- only, when McCain/Palin's SCOTUS appointments reverse Roe v Wade and women start dying because of botched, unsafe illegal abortions, their blood is not going to be on the hands of the people who voted for Obama
posted by matteo at 11:27 AM on September 1, 2008 [9 favorites]


Well, I've already admitted I can do little but gaze in wide wonder at American electoral politics, but it seems to me that if in fact the Obama campaign's success is predicated on his ability to enforce message discipline on thousands of random supporters posting on the internet - or on his ability to "distance" himself from such gossip - then he didn't stand a chance anyway.

Fortunately, I'm reasonably certain that distasteful snark in the blogosphere (whether here or even on DailyKos) has nowhere near that kind of influence on the broad mainstream of the American electorate. If it did, then I'd wager a clear majority of Americans would have understood that the Iraqi government had no connection whatsoever to the 9/11 terrorist attacks - information, after all, which was spread abundantly across the left side of the blogosphere circa late 2002. Just to cite one example.

I mean, consider the opposite argument, which would suggest that on Nov 5, we will see like a Times lead story noting that John McCain's resounding victory was in some significant way a result of a large shift his way from swing voters who were driven from Obama by malicious gossip on leftwing blogs. "There was really no rebounding after obamaniac25's idle speculation about Sarah Palin's kids in the comments section of DailyKos on August 31," said an Obama spokesman. "The lesson for future Democratic candidates is to respond sharply and decisively every time a supporter says something unpleasant on the internet."

I mean, that could happen, right?
posted by gompa at 11:27 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


This is what Obama himself said:


"Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby..."
posted by konolia at 11:27 AM on September 1, 2008


He's not even radical compared to other members of the Democratic Party

Is the often cited "most liberal" ranking (http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/?loc=interstitialskip) wrong/skewed/misleading in some way?

(intended as a serious non-snarky question)
posted by Perplexity at 11:28 AM on September 1, 2008


What Michelle Malkin had to say about Obama's statement.
posted by konolia at 11:29 AM on September 1, 2008


Dipsomaniac, this is the way of my people. I know of what I speak.
posted by small_ruminant at 11:29 AM on September 1, 2008


Weren't there other issues? Something about foreign policy or something?

The 'family values' angle was the way the Republicans were trying to sell Palin. They can hardly complain that the discussion of her is being kept in that superficial realm. At this point the PR guys are probably thinking a discussion of her lack of experience might be an advantage.

And to those of you who would like to use this to say Palin should step down...

Maybe you're not reading the comments here. Nobody wants Palin to step down; she's the biggest gift the Republicans have handed the Democrats all year. And the criticism of Palin here is less that her daughter is pregnant and more that the situation (and how Palin and the party have handled it) exposes a whole host of hypocrisies within the party and this campaign.
posted by troybob at 11:29 AM on September 1, 2008


Well, konolia, the classic anti-abortion position DOES bear a marked resemblance to a punishment. Perhaps that's something for that side of the question to examine for themselves.
posted by Dipsomaniac at 11:30 AM on September 1, 2008


this thread has now entered the Elizabethan Age. Maybe it will come up to date before it's done.
posted by jb at 11:31 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Look, the Republicans are trying to shift the election narrative away from the serious issues of our country (hello, healthcare), and towards these visceral emotional issues that always get people to vote Republican (religion, guns, abortion, gays, etc.) They are all too aware that if they can get these emotional issues to be the center of the discussion, they've already won. This is the same thing that went on 4 years ago, and the same thing that always happens (remember how people were shocked that the 2004 election was about "values" and not Iraq? Don't be shocked again this time.) Not only are they succeeding with wild colors, but liberals seem to be playing right into their hands on this strategy, as always. Listen: ignore the abortion stuff and STICK TO THE MESSAGE: failed war, wrecked economy, and everything else Bush has destroyed in the past 8 years. Otherwise, this election is lost.
posted by naju at 11:33 AM on September 1, 2008 [10 favorites]


I agree with all these comments. The religious fundamentalist demographic, to whom the Palin pick is a blatant appeal, has a very tenuous hold on middle-class status, and these devout Christians have children and relatives who have babies out of wedlock, have brothers-in-law whose meth labs explode, husbands who get DUIs, and generally have very messy family lives. News of Palin's messy, white-trash family problems will appeal greatly to the segment of U.S. population that Palin was picked to appease, a population that finds it hard to relate to the charmed lives of former Harvard Law Review editors, etc.

The people who will be appalled by the out-of-wedlock child are the latte liberals like myself who see childbirth at 17 as an impediment to a young woman's higher academic career.


Yeah, because Latte liberals love to push abstinence only education, uh huh.

Anyway Obama is polling ahead of McCain among low wage workers, and it is not anywhere near true that most fundamentalists are low wage.

It's like any of this matters to you, because for some reason you insist on wearing a hair shirt and trying to spin any news whatsoever as WONDERFUL NEW FOR MCAIN.
posted by afu at 11:33 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


> If, by some chance, she decides to go ahead and have an abortion, she can use their doctor. They'll cover the bill. No one ever even needs to know.

The only moral abortion is my abortion

Pro Life people have abortions also, but only the ones who are able to afford to pay for it privately. That is the irony / hypocrisy of the situation. There will always be choice for the elites, be they democrat or republican. But we can't allow public funding and dissemination of information for the rabble as we want to push our moral agenda on them.

I went to a private middle school that had our sex ed class taught by our biology teacher, with science and everything. Then I went to public highschool were the course material was laughable and taught by our gym teacher reading off of premade cards. The middle school had a much larger republican and pro life base than the highschool, but they were still teaching that (and real science) because it was considered a better education for us the students. But those same parents who were paying for their kids to go the private school were the ones voting against programs that would provide the same level of sex education to the public school.
posted by mrzarquon at 11:34 AM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


And as long as we're talking about responsibility and reproductive freedom, teaching abstinence-only sex ed is irresponsible. Exhibit A is the pregnant 17-year-old.

Also, if Sarah Palin were truly concerned about her daughter's privacy, she wouldn't have agreed to be John McCain's running mate. Her 17-year-old daughter's pregnancy is on CNN, for heaven's sake! Did she think that it would be kept under wraps?
posted by leftcoastbob at 11:35 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Agreed that the white trash/hillbilly comments are way out of line. HOWEVER, I can't understand the criticism of MeFites for discussing Palin's babymaking. That is the ONLY reason Palin is on the ticket. Look back at comments by konolia and others about why this pick energized the Christian right, or the draft Palin website, etc.

Palin is a hero precisely because she kept a special needs baby at 44. Period. They have planned from minute 1 to use emotional stories about Trig and the son going to war in this campaign. But we're somehow wrong to discuss it? Blog speculation will destroy Obama's candidacy? What, just like Obama = Muslim/killing Vincent Foster rumors destroyed Republican candidates?
posted by msalt at 11:36 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


damo:
I would totally watch that sitcom.

Maybe that's what we need - a Three's Company-meets-Benson-meets-Soaptype of joint with all kinds of (political) hijinks so we can all work out these mismatched opinions on how it should all be done (ran, led)...harmlessly.
posted by batmonkey at 11:38 AM on September 1, 2008


This is what Obama himself said:

"Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby..."
posted by konolia at 2:27 PM on September 1 [+] [!]


Thank you, I stand corrected. I don't believe that he meant literally that babies were a punishment, but that early and unplanned parenthood is a serious burden. And it is - I know, because my mother got pregnant at sixteen. She wanted her child (my brother), but it wasn't easy and has changed her life significantly.

But my husband would like to chip in, "Obama's comment was stupid and genuinely offensive," and that if he meant anything else he should have said that.
posted by jb at 11:39 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Funny how it's Palin who lied about her daughter having mono to pull her out of school, so that she wouldn't shame the family by having an out-of-wedlock child...and now it's all the liberal bloggers' fault!

Seriously, it's no wonder we keep losing elections - it's because we can't spin our way out of a wet paper bag. A governor bullies her daughter into hiding, lies to her whole state and probably McCain, gets caught, and we can't even spin this the right way ON FUCKING METAFILTER!?!
posted by a young man in spats at 11:39 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Now let's look at that Obama quote, with context!
When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby. I don't want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn't make sense to not give them information.
Although the wording is clumsy, what he's saying here is that it's important that people make informed decisions. This should be clear to anyone. Pulling part of a sentence out of context to make it seem as though Obama believes children are a punishment is crass and ludicrous.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 11:40 AM on September 1, 2008 [29 favorites]


you've taken a sheer mediocrity and turned her into a martyr and victim of malicious persecution - you've taken what was a slight negative for her campaign and turned it into "those nasty lefties will say anything to hurt people"

I'm pretty sure this was going to happen anyway. The target demo for Palin tend not to read lefty blog echo chambers. By preemptively disclosing the daughter is pregnant before it actually made it into the press (has it? and by press I don't mean dailyKOS, huffpo or this site, or even the cable news nets... I mean the local town papers, etc that today gave huge amounts of ink to the hurricane) gives them the opportunity to demonize the left -- and specifically Obama because his name is mentioned in these blog posts -- and appeal to the sympathy of the same base that is jacked up about Palin in the first place.

So now the McCain/Palin campaign get to dispel the rumor (which wasn't going anywhere anyway) and add a lump of sugar to the already sweet Sarah Palin story. Not only is her daughter going to keep the baby, she's going to marry the young man.

Marriage is important and is a sacred bond between a man and a woman. It isn't like the hockey mom or first dude is pointing a shotgun at the father of the child. These kids love each other and will have their baby.

I wish I didn't know that the daughter was pregnant. I learned that from a press release from the McCain/Palin campaign. Had there not been so many bizarre circumstances of Palin's pregnancy for the lefties to go after like sharks go after chum, this little family secret could have remained that way until after the election.

Regarding, Bristol's 'choice' of keeping the baby. Abortion is legal in the US and she didn't need her parents' permission in Alaska should she decide to do that. But when your mom if the state's poster girl for the anti-choice movement and during the gubernatorial campaign said she wouldn't OK an abortion in the case of rape or incest, Bristol's hands are tied. Although I'm sure every safeguard would be made to keep an abortion completely private, had that leaked to the press that a Feminist for Life member and up and comer in the anti-choice movement had a kid who had an abortion? No, she didn't have a choice after not following her abstinence only training.
posted by birdherder at 11:41 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


So Obama compares an infant human being to an STD. I am so IMPRESSED.
posted by konolia at 11:42 AM on September 1, 2008


If Obama is any kind of man at all, I expect that before the day is out he will make a statement telling his supporters to grow the heck up and leave this alone.

And this shows exactly why it was a horrible idea for people to drag out this rumor in the first place. Obama, who I'm sure wants nothing to do with it, is now assumed to tacitly approve of this trash unless he issues a statement about it. Of course, if he issues a statement, he'll be accused of fanning the flames by talking about it at all. Basically a no-win situation.

Why are the Democrats so good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?
posted by klausness at 11:42 AM on September 1, 2008


Statement from Obama:

"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's chidlren are especially off limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and or her potential perfromance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."

On charges that his campaign has stoked the story via liberal blogs:

"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if i thought there was somebody in my campaign who was invovled in something like, they that would be fired."
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 11:44 AM on September 1, 2008 [35 favorites]


You know why else this is a win for McCain? (Apart from the fact that far too many of you are falling over yourselves to alienate potential Obama voters by acting like exactly the sort of sneering, patronising elitists the right like to stereotype you as, I mean.)

Remember this deft little non-confrontational line from Obama's acceptance speech?

"We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country."

Can't use that angle now. Because then it's a vicious personal attack on a hard working mother that is very much not Change We Can Believe In.
posted by flashboy at 11:45 AM on September 1, 2008


konolia: The AIDS/STD aspects of the quote do add a lot of context to the statement, and it was dishonest to leave to leave that out.
posted by troybob at 11:46 AM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


And, hey, since you all brought it up, sometimes unmarried teen daughters get pregnant. And just like my daughter, this girl is planning to marry the father. Imagine that. Taking responsibility for your actions.

Only among the chronically poor does "taking responsibility" automatically imply something other than self-payment of choices.
posted by Brian B. at 11:46 AM on September 1, 2008


> So Obama compares an infant human being to an STD. I am so IMPRESSED.

Actually, he is listing the consequences of poor sexual education, which include teenage pregnancy and increased risk of stds.

I am sorry, but to equate two things which are the related by their cause is not to make them equal. It would be the same as saying that getting poor fuel mileage in your car from under inflated tires is the same as your engine seizing up because you never change the oil, because in both cases you didn't learn how to take care of your car.
posted by mrzarquon at 11:47 AM on September 1, 2008 [9 favorites]


Obama knows how to handle this situation. Just look at this headline. Look at it! THIS is how you do it. A martini and a charming laugh, a noncommittal shrug and an aloof gaze; Class is IN ladies and gentlemen, take notes.
posted by damo at 11:47 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Meanwhile: Palin was director of group for now-indicted Ted Stevens.


For those of you keeping score, 51 hours since McCain announced his running mate.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 11:48 AM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Bristol Palin made the decision on her own to keep the baby, McCain aides said.

Not to step into the whole abortion debate, but can't "keep" mean 'not give up for adoption', instead of 'not abort'? It would make a fair bit more sense, given Palin/McCain's platform.
posted by Orange Pamplemousse at 11:48 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Ack. 75. Damn Labor Day weekend.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 11:50 AM on September 1, 2008


perplexity:
Is the often cited "most liberal" ranking (http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/?loc=interstitialskip) wrong/skewed/misleading in some way?

(intended as a serious non-snarky question)
Yes, very much so.

It's based on the claim of one magazine, which ranked him "most liberal senator". That magazine is extremist right wing.

Guess who the same magazine ranked most liberal senators in 2004? I'll give you a hint: He was running for President.

It's just absurd propaganda, to rile conservatives up and to put off moderates. As uber-conservative Pat Buchanan himself said, "Barney Frank should be suing over this."
posted by Flunkie at 11:50 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


It's not the pregnancy. It's the hypocrisy.

The Republicans and many of their voters set themselves up as the last moral guardians of an America ready to fall into the abyss of licentiousness and permissiveness. A world where Gilded Liberals bestow welfare on Black New York City mothers with 9 children from 9 different fathers who are abusing the state and riping off hard workin' Joe Six Pack.

The reality is that the states which trend democratic have the lowest rates of teen-pregnancy (and lower rates of abortion, although the stats on that are muddy), contribute more in tax dollars then they get back in welfare, and generally have more family cohesion, lower divorce rates, less alcohol and drug abuse, etc. etc.

But meanwhile in the churches and in the elections we see people screaming about how the liberals have brought moral decrepitude to America. They oppose sex education, contraception, drug treatment, welfare and other programs that actually have their roots in earlier Christian values of tolerance, respect, and compassion.

Again, it's not the pregnancy. We all know these things happen. It's the hypocrisy of someone who wants to legislate morality instead of compassion and is unable to instill values in their own family, let alone the rest of the country.
posted by cell divide at 11:51 AM on September 1, 2008 [13 favorites]


Not to step into the whole abortion debate, but can't "keep" mean 'not give up for adoption', instead of 'not abort'?

Cultural context. Keeping the baby would refer to adoption in pretty much the same way getting a blow job would refer to appointment with my hairdresser.
posted by troybob at 11:51 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


This is what Obama himself said:
"Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby..."


Konolia, do you honestly think that a father of two considers children a punishment? Really?

Or was he merely speaking realistically in that getting pregnant as teenager can seriously wreck a person's life in this day and age, especially if they don't have support system.

On preview:
Statement from Obama:

Excellent statement, he nailed it.

Now lets move on Palin's qualifications or lack there and McCain's irresponsibility in picking someone so unqualified.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 11:53 AM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


The McCain camp: "Vetting? Yeah, we've heard of it."
posted by grouse at 11:55 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Okay, Andrew Sullivan's last post on this was a bridge too far, even for me. Ugh.
posted by empath at 11:56 AM on September 1, 2008


"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's chidlren are especially off limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and or her potential perfromance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics. [...]Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if i thought there was somebody in my campaign who was invovled in something like, they that would be fired."

Man enough for you, konolia? Or should we hold our breath till you parse his statement whereby merely saying "strongly urge" rather than, say, "urge in the strongest possible terms" proves he isn't really denouncing the rumors at all?

Also, just curious: do you think McCain's "man enough" to state publicly he'd fire anyone involved in spreading false rumors about Obama's family?
posted by scody at 11:58 AM on September 1, 2008 [21 favorites]


The McCain camp: "Vetting? Yeah, we've heard of it."

"...it's when you take your cat to the vet! NEXT QUESTION."
posted by scody at 11:59 AM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


it was dishonest to leave to leave that out.

Color me shocked.
posted by maxwelton at 11:59 AM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


scody: "Close? Biden's got 13 points on her, with only 5% not choosing either of them. That's not close; that's a landslide."

orthogonality: "In voting terms, 54-41is no where near close. It's a commanding lead just short of a landslide."

Really? I wouldn't think so. I mean, many of the Democratic primaries were decided 60-40 or 70-30, and that was between two candidates that were largely similar in policies and appeal. I'd hope that a contest as lopsided as Palin-Biden would be similarly lopsided in outcome, a rebuke to the GOP for ever running such a terrible candidate. But instead Palin, who is painfully unqualified, gets just nine points short of half the country to support her over Biden?

Maybe we're just so used to electorates of millions of voters split down to razor-thin margins year after year that a 13-point spread seems incredibly decisive in comparison. It troubles me, though.
posted by Rhaomi at 11:59 AM on September 1, 2008


Obama: "I don’t want them punished with a baby..."

What a nasty worldview: Babies are the enemy. But I guess this mindset is required in order to justify the killing of unborn life.
posted by jsonic at 12:00 PM on September 1, 2008



Man enough for you, konolia


Absolutely.

I should have worded that post a little differently-I really did expect that Obama would make the statement he did-as I just mentioned to Jessica on Memail, I honestly do think Obama is a classy guy overall, and I certainly do not believe he is the type of person who would want his supporters involved in these personal attacks on a family member.
posted by konolia at 12:02 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


It means that we've been giving Rove and his buddies great material to smear Obama with. Congratulations all around.

Utter bullshit. Rove and the Republican machine would have invented culpability on Obama's behalf, either way.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:02 PM on September 1, 2008


konolia's version of Obama's statement:

"...children...if I thought there was somebody in my campaign who was involved in something like, they that would be fired.
posted by troybob at 12:03 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Love that last comment by Cell Divide.

It is Republicans, not Democrats, who have viewed controlling what people may and may not do with their reproductive systems as a suitable matter for public policy, debate, and legislation. And it is the same political group that has sought to control what can be disclosed to teens about birth control. When someone jumps on that bandwagon, it is not hard to see that their reproductive choices, as well as those of their families, will be a subject for our discussion in evaluating them as candidates for office. They are presenting their policies as viable ways for families to live, so one would think they would be good examples of how those policies work in practice.

Now that Palin's daughter got knocked up out of wedlock, it is natural to wonder whether she sincerely supports abstinence-only education, or whether she's just a damned hypocrite.
posted by jayder at 12:03 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


What a nasty worldview: Babies are the enemy. But I guess this mindset is required in order to justify the killing of unborn life.

All right. That cinches it. jsconic is a robot programmed with only one phrase. We have to play one of those Star Trek games to get him to short circuit, or he'll destroy the Enterprise.
posted by Astro Zombie at 12:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [12 favorites]


Reposted for Konolia, so that she won't miss it, and she can make her statement of approval clear.

"I have said before and I will repeat again: People's families are off limits," Obama said. "And people's chidlren are especially off limits. This shouldn't be part of politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor and or her potential perfromance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18 and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."

On charges that his campaign has stoked the story via liberal blogs:

"I am offended by that statement. There is no evidence at all that any of this involved us," he said. "Our people were not involved in any way in this, and they will not be. And if i thought there was somebody in my campaign who was invovled in something like, they that would be fired."
posted by cashman at 12:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


In other news, sci-fi fans weigh in.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Obama: "I don’t want them punished with a baby..."

What a nasty worldview: Babies are the enemy. But I guess this mindset is required in order to justify the killing of unborn life.


So why do you want to punish people with babies?
posted by Brian B. at 12:08 PM on September 1, 2008


Cashman, check your preview. ;-)
posted by konolia at 12:08 PM on September 1, 2008


What a nasty worldview: Babies are the enemy. But I guess this mindset is required in order to justify the killing of unborn life.

It's official: You are an idiot, in addition to hating women.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 12:08 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Further, they'll probably blame it on liberal bloggers

My initial read on this was that they would probably blame the pregnancy on liberal bloggers! Sperm traveling through the inter tubes!

These last few days have brought me tears of hysterical laughter as well as tears of despair. There is a very real possibility that we could have a president who knows less about her country than every naturalized citizen. I don't think we have yet discovered the abysmal depths of her ignorance. I can't help but think that she knows so little because she was too busy walking around in high heels and a bathing suit begging people to judge the size of her thighs and the shape of her bottom. That, and the idea that she supports the Alaska for Nationhood movement while being against birth control, makes her a very strange choice to represent the people.

I will say that blaming people for being interested in someone's personal life when they are running for office is ridiculous. The fact is, there are those who will want to know what her favorite cookie recipe is, some will want to know if she drinks, and other people will feel the need to research all her ancestors. Whatever color your politics, human interest stories are...interesting. And speculation here on Metafilter isn't going to change the mind of anyone with an ounce of sense when it comes time to actually vote.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 12:13 PM on September 1, 2008


konolia, thanks. And now I ask just one favor: tell your fitness instructor that you yourself do know a Marxist (ahem), and she says definitively that Obama ain't one.
posted by scody at 12:15 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


posted by konolia at 11:42 AM on September 1

Since you're here, why not answer my question?
posted by Optimus Chyme at 12:16 PM on September 1, 2008


Further, they'll probably blame it on liberal bloggers

My initial read on this was that they would probably blame the pregnancy on liberal bloggers! Sperm traveling through the inter tubes!


I'll go you one better. I'm so bleary from sorting through all this that I thought her pregnancy was being blamed on liberal loggers!
posted by leftcoastbob at 12:18 PM on September 1, 2008


Konolia, jsonic, please look at the plain meaning of what Obama said , including the first half of the quote that you keep editing out.

The most important prevention is education…which should include abstinence education and teaching the children…that sex is not something casual. But it should also include…information about contraception because…if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.

He's talking about contraception, not abortion. Teaching people to use contraception reduces the need for abortion. This is a good thing, right? Which part of this do you disagree with?
posted by designbot at 12:18 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


no, what I see is people enjoying the trainwreck of hypocrisy of moralistic politicians

as opposed to the trainwreck of hypocrisy of moralistic "woman's right to privacy" advocates not only mouthing off about a 17 year old woman's pregnancy but insinuating that her mother a) pretended to be pregnant with a down's syndrome kid that actually belonged to her daughter or b) insisting that her mother was flying all around the country as some kind of "friendly skies" alternative to an abortion clinic?

really?

but please keep blaming the libruls for being "mean"

you forgot stupid, venal, slanderous, obnoxious and shameless

you're for or against decency in politics and in life - and no red herring accusations of hypocrisy can save you from the perception that this is sheer guttersnipe mud-slinging that you're committing here

if this is what the culture wars are coming to, then i say to hell with both sides, because we don't have a decent culture thanks to you
posted by pyramid termite at 12:20 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


...I thought her pregnancy was being blamed on liberal loggers!

Little would surprise me at this point.
posted by troybob at 12:20 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


So Obama compares an infant human being to an STD. I am so IMPRESSED.

Just for clarity: in light of him speaking about abstinence-only sex education, this obviously means that he believes comprehensive sex education prevents things like unwanted pregnancy and STDs and the punishment is referring to the debilitating problems that can arise from them.
posted by effwerd at 12:22 PM on September 1, 2008


He's talking about contraception, not abortion. Teaching people to use contraception reduces the need for abortion. This is a good thing, right? Which part of this do you disagree with?

I find it even more peculiar that his recommending abstinence eduation would be ignored. But I guess in the mad pursuit of the cherry-picked, out of context damnation, details like this are glossed over briefly, unregistered. Comrade Obama bin Laden hates children, and hates America.
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:22 PM on September 1, 2008


Puh-leeze with the generalized blame to "you all" "liberal bloggers." A handful of people here have been commenting gleefully on the whole pregnancy issue, with an equal or greater number saying "leave it alone."

While I bemoan the tendency, people are people and in the absence of information, there will be speculation and gossip. This was not something that began with liberal bloggers but something that has been swirling around locally in Alaska and first surfaced from local commentary. Second, let's not forget that although much of the speculation has proven specious, this whole matter has not been something totally fabricated from thin air but something based in fact: the Palin girl is indeed pregnant. In accepting the nomination, her Mom full well knew that this family matter was something that would be in the public realm at some point and that it would be hurtful.

Furthermore, along the lines of birdherder's suggestion, I am cynical enough to think that shrewd rovian disinformation operatives probably began the more extreme rumors careening through the blogosphere as a way to get the uncomfortable news out and create a sympathetic backlash against liberals. They have proven masterful about launching large scale spins that turn positives into negatives and negatives into positives so it is not inconceivable that they did so in this case too.

I am still flummoxed by the whole Palin thing. Hard to see how the republicans let this happen. Did they fall for their own disinformation campaign, actually believing there are 18 million Hillary disaffecteds who are up for grabs and it would be a simple as flashing a pair of boobs to secure their votes? Hah, that would be too delicious.

I think the power brokers just played their trump card too soon - their desperation to hang on to power threw their timing off. It's immaterial to them if Palin has no substance, since they are the ones that pull the strings, they just need a dummy with a charismatic public persona to be the front man a la Reagan. If they had left her in place for a few more years propping up her resume and insinuating her strategically in the national dialogue, she might have one day been formidable conservative candidate ... but by thrusting her on the national stage prematurely, they have likely overreached and spoiled her chances for good. One can only hope.

But I don't fully count her out yet. Or McCain. Giant corporate interests have grown fat while greedily stuffing their pockets these last eight years and they are not going to release their grip on power without a ferocious fight. While McCain may not be their top choice, he is their best hope. I am surprised by some who feel confident of victory. Like Charlie Brown and the football, liberals keep lining up for the kick and being amazed and hurt when we find ourselves bruised on the ground. In electoral politics it comes down to swing states, where the stupid has proven thick. In truth, the stupid has run distressingly thick throughout the nation, and that's without even factoring in wild cards like racism. I am not defeatist, but by the same token I am not going to feel secure until there is a stake through the heart of the republican party - and probably not even then.
posted by madamjujujive at 12:25 PM on September 1, 2008 [22 favorites]


if this is what the culture wars are coming to, then i say to hell with both sides, because we don't have a decent culture thanks to you

In other words, this is why we can't have nice things.
posted by jayder at 12:26 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Re:
I do wonder how her parents reacted when she told them -- batmonkey

Well, based on this info...

On April 20, 1989 – less than eight months after they eloped – their first son, Track, was born. -- posted by ericb

...How about, "Been there, done that"?
posted by skyper at 12:27 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Also, just curious: do you think McCain's "man enough" to state publicly he'd fire anyone involved in spreading false rumors about Obama's family?

McCain or his staff would never do that, so that doesn't make sense. And even if it looked like he or a staffer had done it, we know it must have been those wily Syrians at it again.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 12:27 PM on September 1, 2008


"you're for or against decency in politics and in life"

Whose decency is that, then? Yours?
posted by Dipsomaniac at 12:30 PM on September 1, 2008


The fact that she has used the little power she has had as mayor and governor to get people who stood in her way fired should be enough to keep her from getting elected (think Alaskan John Bolton). Anything non-political is just a distraction.
posted by drezdn at 12:33 PM on September 1, 2008


I think the power brokers just played their trump card too soon - their desperation to hang on to power threw their timing off. It's immaterial to them if Palin has no substance, since they are the ones that pull the strings, they just need a dummy with a charismatic public persona to be the front man a la Reagan. If they had left her in place for a few more years propping up her resume and insinuating her strategically in the national dialogue, she might have one day been formidable conservative candidate ... but by thrusting her on the national stage prematurely, they have likely overreached and spoiled her chances for good. One can only hope.

Wow. I think there's a lot to that - the preemie Reagan.

Eesh, did it just get colder in here?
posted by Marisa Stole the Precious Thing at 12:33 PM on September 1, 2008


"In voting terms, 54-41is no where near close. It's a commanding lead just short of a landslide."

Really? I wouldn't think so.


Yeah. A 13-point margin in the popular vote translates to a massive landslide electorally. In 1980, Reagan beat Carter 50.8% to 41%. He won 489 electoral votes to Carter's 49. It's not at all surprising to me that Palin's pulling 41%. 30% of the electorate will vote for anyone, anyone, anyone their party runs. Nearly 30% of Illinois voted for Alan "Batshit Insane" Keyes against Barack Obama in his Senate race, for heaven's sake. The fact that 1/7th of the non-crazies like her doesn't surprise me a bit.
posted by EarBucket at 12:36 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


pyramid termite:
"you forgot stupid, venal, slanderous, obnoxious and shameless

you're for or against decency in politics and in life - and no red herring accusations of hypocrisy can save you from the perception that this is sheer guttersnipe mud-slinging that you're committing here

if this is what the culture wars are coming to, then i say to hell with both sides, because we don't have a decent culture thanks to you
"

Whoa, whoa, whoa! What the heck?

Put down the firehose you're painting with - take a moment and calm down, or otherwise stop to read more clearly through that haze of anger.

Why does it have to come to calling everyone not on the right so many ugly names when you're really referring to a small group of people who represent the most extreme viewpoints of the non-right?

There is a HUGE middle ground we could all be aiming for. A middle ground of reason and what we can all agree to, at minimum, as fair and just. A middle ground with no ceiling on how much potential is available to each American, no cap to the dignity of humane and equal upbringings, no limit to the decency of human rights.

It doesn't have to come to this screaming, shrieking, vitriolic, hysterical, exasperated, melodramatic point and then end in huffing away with red faces, certain that we can never work together.

We MUST work together. We MUST find this common ground. This constant pushing off each other and on each other and into each other isn't going to get us the lives, government, nation, and even planet we should be able to enjoy and enrich with much less struggle, fear, and disparity.
posted by batmonkey at 12:38 PM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


Is the often cited "most liberal" ranking wrong/skewed/misleading in some way?

Yes. National Journal puts it out.

National Journal is not in the business of discovering who is the most liberal senator in a disinterested fashion.

National Journal is in the business of finding some set of votes that make whoever the (likely) Democratic nominee is appear to be the most liberal senator.

The (or at least a) right way to do this is to look at all votes instead of cherry-picking votes. Keith Poole's \textsc{nominate} scores do that. They run from -1 to 1, with liberal on the left. There are other ways to analyze whole vote records as well, even Bayesian ways, but \textsc{nominate} is the most common.

Using that measure in the 110th Congress, 13 senators are more liberal than Obama, and 35 are more conservative than McCain.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 12:38 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


note to self: html != LaTeX.

Now to scrawl it on the walls 100 times.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 12:40 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


So now the McCain/Palin campaign get to dispel the rumor (which wasn't going anywhere anyway) and add a lump of sugar to the already sweet Sarah Palin story. Not only is her daughter going to keep the baby, she's going to marry the young man.

They didn't dispel the rumor, they gave credibility to the rumor! Rumors don't gain force by being true, they gain force by people talking about them. And by having to come out with a statement confirming that Palin's teenage daughter is pregnant. (And since some people here are bizarrely unaware of this, most Americans are against teen pregnancy. That is why the Palin family covered this up as long as they did.)

Let's take a look at how the average low information swing voter is going to see this story. Say she is a Hillary voter because she thought things were going good during the Clinton years but she's not sure about Obama with all the talk of him being a radical, and of course McCain is a maverick so she is not sure who to vote for in the general. She doesn't pay that much attention to the news or politics anyway.

First she hears that Palin is chosen to be VP, she thinks it is a little weird that this unknown got the nod, but Palin seems like a strong intelligent women. Then today she happens to read in the headlines that Palin's 17 year old daughter is pregnant. The swing voter doesn't think to much about it because she doesn't really pay to much attention to the news anyway. A few weeks later she is talking to her nut job liberal friend and he is going on and on about how Palin lied about giving birth to her son with Down Syndrome. Normally she wouldn't give a rumor like this any heed, but she did read in the paper a while back that Palin's teenage daughter was pregnant. She thinks to herself that she really doesn't want someone who would lie like that that in the Whitehouse.

This is how swift boating works. The rumor doesn't have to be true, it just has to be out there. Now, I definitely don't think the Obama campaign should be pushing this, but they don't have to, Palin brought it on herself by accepting the nomination. (The same thing happened to John Edwards). I can't believe so many people don't understand this. Have you been asleep for the past two elections?
posted by afu at 12:41 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


There is a HUGE middle ground we could all be aiming for.

there is a minority on the left, just as there is on the right, who do not want this, who will stoop to any level to "score points", and my comments are directed at them

and yes, they are present here and when they use the kind of tactics they've used today, i'm going to tell them off
posted by pyramid termite at 12:45 PM on September 1, 2008


scody writes "konolia, thanks. And now I ask just one favor: tell your fitness instructor that you yourself do know a Marxist (ahem), and she says definitively that Obama ain't one."

scody, if you really think a Marxist has infiltrated Metafilter, you should report him to mathowie and the FBI, at once!
posted by orthogonality at 12:47 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


I thought her pregnancy was being blamed on liberal loggers

OMG the critics were right.

Juno DID promote teenage pregnancy!
posted by skyper at 12:53 PM on September 1, 2008


It ain't that in their hearts they're bad
They can comfort you, some even try
They nurse you when you're ill of health
They bury you when you go and die
It ain't that in their hearts they're bad
They'd stick by you if they could
But that's just bullshit
People just ain't no good

People they ain't no good
People they ain't no good
People they ain't no good
People they ain't no good at all
~Nick Cave
posted by dawson at 12:58 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


note to self: html != LaTeX

Note to self: Latex is good.

I am reminded of the old Garrett Morris sportscaster/ex-pro-jock character going on about making basketball backboards of something besides glass, but "not rubber, because rubber breaks."
posted by fourcheesemac at 1:01 PM on September 1, 2008


She didn't literally mean that she thought he was a card carrying member of the Communist party. She was just expressing how she saw him as a leftist. Please remember that to folks on the right the word "communist" is kinda an epithet for those folks they see as on the extreme left.

Right, gotcha now. I still know way too many folks in NC and Michigan that still toss out the "Commie" epithet in all seriousness.
My main point still stands though. Even if the the comment was tossed out in a half-joking manner, that person would still never vote for the Dem, so there's no point in bothering yourselft for that person's vote.
Would you consider this same type of throw away comment about McCain from a kid in dreadlocks and a Greenpeace t-shirt at the local Whole Foods as problematic for McCain? "McCain? I would never vote for that Nazi." Of course you wouldn't. You would just roll your eyes and/or give the universal "jagoff" hand gesture and be on with your life.

I AM telling you that a lot of people I know really do see him as an extreme leftist whether or not that is where Democrats think he fits on the political spectrum.

Again, the same thing. People on both ends of the American political spectrum are so set in their philosophy that they'll never, ever consider voting for someone that has a D or an R next to their name on the ballot. It's just not gonna happen, so it's not really a problem for the candidate.
Besides, you personally knowing lots of people who think that Obama is an extreme lefist actually says more about you and your friends than it does about Obama. No insult implied, just saying that this is the type of person you hang out with.
posted by NoMich at 1:03 PM on September 1, 2008


Anyway, for the people Konolia talking to at the gym, "Communist" doesn't mean Marxist and is only barely about econmics.

For them, "Communist" means "Russian" (sic) means "Atheist". Soviet-style state-mandated atheism. In other words, a "Communist" means somebody taking God out of the public schools, and all the horrors that proceed from that: children talking back, children taking drugs, children having pre-marital or gay sex.

It's about losing control of their kids and the very future their kids are supposed to secure for them, a future of hewing to past certainties and traditional ways. To sum it up, "Communist" ends up being "our kids rejecting us and our cultural values", adopting secular city ways and "Hollywood" values, and showing "disrespect" for their old-fashioned "moral" parents.

It's ultimately the fear of their own children seeing them as parochial, limited, un-hip, uneducated, which is why the "trailer-trash" and "hill-billy" comments really hit a nerve: they're afraid that meddling "Communists" will cause them to hear those pejoratives from their own children's mouths.
posted by orthogonality at 1:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


Dear Obama supporters. On last thursday, the Candidate you wish to become President stood up and gave What was arguably one of the finest Political speeches in recent history. Record numbers of Americans watched this speech.

And none of them seemed to actually be listening. His opponents sure as hell weren't listening, and it's looking like a lot of his supporters also weren't listening as well.

"let's not make this big election about small things"

The real issue her is that John McCain made this selection without vetting his choice. He was sloppy, impulsive, and once again has shown that he is not taking this election as seriously as he should. After the last 8 years, the last thing we need is more shoddy hiring decisions at the highest levels of our govt. It's not about experience, and it's not about values. It's about judgement. Obama put his VP choices through the most rigorous vetting process of any modern campaign. And we're talking about known people. Joe Biden has been in The Senate his entire adult life, and ran for President twice, and still got put through the wringer before Obama pulled the trigger. McCain went on a hunch and and a misguided sense of identity politics.

That's it. Discussing anything else is beneath you, and beneath your candidate.

Arguing about all this other shit is like wrestling with a pig. You don't get bacon by wrestling pigs. You get bacon by killing pigs.
posted by billyfleetwood at 1:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [25 favorites]


"In voting terms, 54-41 is no where near close. It's a commanding lead just short of a landslide."

Here is 54-41 in graphical terms:

▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩

Just 3 blocs (▤▤▤) out of this population of 19 changing:

▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▤▤▤▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩

flips this "commanding lead": to:

▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩▩
posted by troy at 1:05 PM on September 1, 2008


if this is what the culture wars are coming to, then i say to hell with both sides, because we don't have a decent culture thanks to you

I wouldn't overestimate how much the blog culture affects or represents the culture at large. (despite all the Republican outcry about liberal bloggers, which is more a disdain for a forum of discussion that doesn't afford the one-way flow and sufficient control of information necessary for the right wing to make its most ridiculous assertions). I'd have to say that more often, even many of the lowest comments here are more thoughtful and informative than the plane on which national politics are discussed and decided. And there are plenty of voices here to call it out, and plenty who do.

Consider the whole rumor about how Palin covered for her daughter's pregnancy. You could put down the people who discussed it, but that discussion has now led to the spectacle of seeing Republicans reach around their ass to get to their elbow in order to put a positive spin on all this. Really, a Republican PR person casually dismissing a candidate's daughter's out-of-wedlock teen pregnancy with "Life happens"? Priceless.
posted by troybob at 1:09 PM on September 1, 2008


First ROU_Xenophobe starts with the LaTeX, and now troy appears to be using METAFONT. I think we need a Feynman diagram next.
posted by lukemeister at 1:13 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin obviously gave birth to this thread. Because it's retardedly long.

There's a newborn Palin thread on PoliticalFilter, btw. It loads very quickly.
posted by homunculus at 1:13 PM on September 1, 2008


What Michelle Malkin had to say about Obama's statement.

While I'm sure a woman who thinks that sending American citizens to internment camps based solely on their ethnicity is a beacon of rational thought, I'm not really sure what additional insights being a complete nutcase gives her into this strange soap opera of a national election.
posted by cmonkey at 1:15 PM on September 1, 2008 [10 favorites]


...and now troy appears to be using METAFONT.

Yeah, the first thing I thought was that somebody's been studying his Tufte...
posted by troybob at 1:16 PM on September 1, 2008


# How many middle or upper class, college bound women do you know who had kids when they were teenagers? Do you think this is because they didn't get pregnant? No.

Yes, most of them did indeed not get pregnant. They used *contraception*. Maybe you've heard of it.
posted by lodev at 1:19 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


but if he doesn't distance himself from this pronto and with obvious disgust I guess my admittedly worthless vote will be a write-in for Lieberman

c'mon dawson, since you're the person who "simply adores Bush" don't pretend that Obama, the anti-Bush, is your guy. Hell, the McCain camp was considering putting your guy in the VP slot.
posted by troy at 1:21 PM on September 1, 2008


lodev, my guess is that you don't know how many of them got pregnant. Neither do I.
posted by small_ruminant at 1:21 PM on September 1, 2008


Arguing about all this other shit is like wrestling with a pig. You don't get bacon by wrestling pigs. You get bacon by killing pigs.

The quote is "You both get dirty, and the pig likes it."

What makes you think that all the people pushing this are Obama supporters? Maybe they just really hate Republicans. It's great that Obama himself wants to elevate the discussion, but he's not God. The rest of us are still free to gossip if we want.
posted by empath at 1:23 PM on September 1, 2008


Dear Obama supporters. On last thursday, the Candidate you wish to become President stood up and gave What was arguably one of the finest Political speeches in recent history. Record numbers of Americans watched this speech.

And none of them seemed to actually be listening.


That's right. All 80,000 people at Mile High and all 38 million viewers on TV have commented in this thread, and each of them was peddling the baby rumors!
posted by scody at 1:25 PM on September 1, 2008 [10 favorites]


What makes you think that all the people pushing this are Obama supporters? Maybe they just really hate Republicans. It's great that Obama himself wants to elevate the discussion, but he's not God. The rest of us are still free to gossip if we want.
posted by empath at 3:23 PM on September 1


You're right. That's the problem with the commie liberal marxist lefties. They don't fall in line like they should. They all have opinions and points of view that don't always line up.

example: Obama sent me a text saying I should donate $5 to the red cross. He's not the boss of me. I donated $20*.


* yesterday, over a day before getting the text message. I'm not a puppet.
posted by birdherder at 1:34 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


As a conservative-leaning independent, I've been giving serious consideration to voting for Obama. But if it puts me on the same side as some of people posting here, I think I'd rather stay home. -- Fuzzy Skinner
Look, it's certainly embarrassing for me as a liberal, but keep in mind there are just as many lunatics on the Right, people who have been spreading "Obama is a Muslim" rumors and stuff like that. There's no "Side" in a two-party nation that's totally free of crazies. Besides, there are plenty of people here who have been arguing against the rumors (Including me)
I must be an evil fuck too but, I am incredibly happy that Palin's daughter is pregnant. This completely neutralizes any blow back to Obama from people speculating about her faking the pregnancy. -- afu


You can't be serious. First of all, it proves all those people wrong. Second of all, it was still disgusting, insane, behavior -- regardless of her daughters pregnancy.
And, hey, since you all brought it up, sometimes unmarried teen daughters get pregnant. And just like my daughter, this girl is planning to marry the father. Imagine that. Taking responsibility for your actions. Taking responsibility for a new life.-- konolia
And if Sarah Palin had taken responsibility to teach her daughter about birth control, she wouldn't be pregnant in the first place. That to me is the huge irony about pro-lifers. They claim to be opposed to abortion, and at the same time they're also opposed to sex-ed unless it's abstinence only and contraceptives, which leads to some teens giving into human weakness and getting pregnant.
I don't know him personally, but has he said anything like this? As far as I know, he's been off giving speeches on trade policy, employment and hurricanes. Babies weren't mentioned. -- jb
Interestingly, Obama did stress the need to reduce unplanned pregnancies in his big speech just last Thursday.
Do you not realize that the Republican party wants abortion to be legal? And do you not know why? The Republican party wants - needs - legal abortion so every four years they can get you to come out and vote for their candidate.

Because if it weren't for that single issue, you would vote for the party that fights for prenatal care for mothers, for better healthcare for children, and for tax cuts for the poor and middle-class.
-- Optimus Chyme
This is an incredibly stupid and dangerious idea. The GOP has been hitting the Abortion issue for Decades, and now you've got people, like Sarah Palin in power who genuinely want to stop abortion. And they'll be able to do it too, if they can stack the court. Furthermore, If they do succeed, they can still use it as a campaign platform but claiming that if they don't keep power, or get back in, Abortion will be re-legalized.
Is the often cited "most liberal" ranking (http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/?loc=interstitialskip) wrong/skewed/misleading in some way? -- Perplexity
Of course it is. In 2004, Kerry and Edwards were the first and second most liberal senators, in 2008, it was Obama and Clinton, and now they're claiming that Biden is the 3rd most liberal. Notice a pattern? The "most liberal" rankings are designed specifically around the most likely presidential candidates. It's all bullshit.

--

Just to clarify my position, I thought that the rumors and stuff about Bristol being Trig's mother were crazy and disgusting, but I do think it's fair to at least discuss Bristol's pregnancy because it does relate to the values and policies she favors. She's pro-life, and she also (I'm assuming) supports abstinence only education. If she had taught her daughter about birth control, Bristol would be much less likely to be pregnant. She's living with the consequences of her own policies, which is actually the opposite of Hypocrisy, so you can't really tag them with that. But there are a lot of people who don't want to live that way and this is a perfect illustration of why.

Remember, a majority of Americans are actually pro-choice, and even more of them support full sex-ed for kids. It's a fact. And Sarah Palin does think it is the governments job to control people's sex lives and reproductive choices.

I don't think it should be used as some kind of cheap political attack, but I think it's fair to note that this is, at least partially, the consequences of her own platform.
Reposted for Konolia, so that she won't miss it, and she can make her statement of approval clear. -- cashman
Um, Konolia already responded to that, and she said the statement was fine.
posted by delmoi at 1:35 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


So Obama compares an infant human being to an STD. I am so IMPRESSED.

Michael Brown is on Fox News as of now, bloviating about Katrina and Neil Cavuto is slamming Bill Clinton for being mean to Brown. I am so IMPRESSED too, because Brown should be in jail and Cavuto should be driving a truck; instead they're rich and happy, isn't that impressive.

also, konolia, for some of us unwanted pregnancies are, no shit, unwanted -- and we find it not right to punish women for the sin of fucking, the way you guys want to do. that's what the anti-sex ed, anti-condom, anti-abortion people are in the end: you are people who, for religious reasons or otherwise, want to punish women for fucking.
posted by matteo at 1:36 PM on September 1, 2008 [9 favorites]



Um, Konolia already responded to that, and she said the statement was fine.


Yeah I saw.
posted by cashman at 1:42 PM on September 1, 2008


The quote is "You both get dirty, and the pig likes it."

Sounds kinky! Tell me more. What happens when you wrestle a cow? Do you both get milk, and does the cow also like it? Cause I think that might be illegal.
posted by billyfleetwood at 1:43 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Funny how it's Palin who lied about her daughter having mono to pull her out of school, so that she wouldn't shame the family by having an out-of-wedlock child...and now it's all the liberal bloggers' fault!

a young man in spats, we have no evidence that the mono thing was a lie. According to the kos blog, the girl was absent from school five to eight months with mono. If she's five mos pregnant now, the pregnancy dates back to about April.

There's no evidence I know of that the Palins lied, or covered up. The information had evidently been known to Anchorage newsfolk for quite some time, and they did nothing with it: a fairly typical journalistic judgment call.

And (replying to some of the other posts flying around) it's perfectly ridiculous to think that Palin wouldn't have made McCain aware of this information before they sealed their deal. Come ON.
There's nothing odd about the fact that McCain, having this info before the announcement, didn't running away screaming "OMG she has a pregnant unwed daughter!!!!" That is a characterization of conservatives that has more hold on the minds of some of the posters here than basis in reality. Obviously the news was going to come out, and obviously they didn't care.
posted by torticat at 1:49 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I wonder how her mono would have affected the fetus in the early stages.

just kidding!
posted by troybob at 1:55 PM on September 1, 2008


Speaking of the Obama is a muslim thing, there's a new one brewing.
posted by empath at 2:00 PM on September 1, 2008


Just 3 blocs (▤▤▤) out of this population of 19 changing:
flips this "commanding lead": to:

which might be an instructive visualization if 19 people decided elections. along similar lines just one block ([X]) out of a population of two changes a "commanding lead" of 100% ([X][X]) to a stalemate ([X][ ]).
posted by alk at 2:03 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


And as long as we're talking about responsibility and reproductive freedom, teaching abstinence-only sex ed is irresponsible. Exhibit A is the pregnant 17-year-old.

I think you've nailed it. Sarah Palin' 17-year-old daughter (and soon-to-be grandchild) are lucky because they will (most likely) benefit from a supportive family environment. High school kids have sex and sometimes mistakes happen, usually because kids at that age do not have the cognitive ability to understand the potential consequences of their actions.

This is why the "abstinence-only sex ed" dogma so popular in the States right now and supported by Palin is so wrong, and why Palin (but not her family) deserves to be grilled over this.

This is a major issue, not only about reproductive rights, but also about the rights of women. What kind of quality of life is Bristol Palin, married at 17, going to have simply because she was not taught sex ed? And, being the daughter of a state governor, she's one of the lucky ones.

What kind of quality of life will the tens of thousands of other teen mothers and their children have without access to adequate childcare and ECE for their own children, decent education and training for themselves?

Palin deserves to be criticized for supporting "abstinence-only sex ed", because "abstinence-only sex ed" really means "if you can't do the time, don't do the crime", which is an authoritarian and punitive response to teen pregnancy.
posted by KokuRyu at 2:07 PM on September 1, 2008 [13 favorites]


That to me is the huge irony about pro-lifers.

irony reminiscent of this guy:
Derek, who was thrown from the vehicle, was not wearing a seat belt, Lefler said. He said Havermann and Uphoff were wearing seat belts at the time.

In a column written for the Daily Nebraskan in September, Derek attacked seat belt laws as intrusions on individual liberties and expensive to enforce.
posted by troy at 2:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


The Mother of all elections! The election of a Lifetime! How many movies will Lifetime Television be able to make out of this election? We have Hillary left with the bill for a cracked glass ceiling; Obama, whose mother sent him to live with his grandparents; Biden, whose wife and child were killed in a wreck and whose sons helped him seal the deal with the new wife; possible VP Edwards strays from a sick wife and finds his Lewinsky; McCain abandons a hospitalized wife for a new one and now Sarah Palin has the added story of a pregnant daughter. Yes WE Network Can!
posted by Frank Grimes at 2:29 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Who could have predicted a point at which The Onion could get by with publishing the week's actual headlines?
posted by troybob at 2:30 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Just to reiterate what homunculus linked to above - just how the choice of Palin was foisted on McCain.

Video from a Focus on the Family "news" site

Max Blumenthal's piece in the Huffington Post

So Dobson, Grover Norquist and others get together to find the VP they would prefer, and as they have in the past with George W. Bush, picked an attractive buffoon that would follow direction. The way she is discussed in the focus on the family piece is like a piece of meat, she's is realy just window dressing - pro-life, family values, big oil window dressing.

And McCain went with their choice because he was being a maverick, not going with Karl Rove's choice, Mitt Romney. I think the Dobson group thought McCain would vet her and McCain's people may have come away from the Dobson meeting thinking she was pre-vetted.
Anyway they were running out of time - and I bet she will step down within a few days and Romney will step in.
posted by readery at 2:31 PM on September 1, 2008


Mrs. Palin’s statement identified the father only by a first name, Levi. “Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family,...

“Then we have our daughter Bristol, she’s on the bus with the newborn, and then we have our daughter Willow, who is here, and our youngest daughter Piper,” Ms. Palin said as she introduced her family. “On that bus we have our son Trig, who is a beautiful baby boy we welcomed into the world just in April. It’s his naptime, so he is with his big sister on the bus. But we thank them for being here. “



Well, that's about the best way I could've thought of to keep your late teenage years from being used up taking care of your own mother's Down syndrome baby, a baby Mrs. Palin may be too busy to pay much attention to for a long time.
posted by jamjam at 2:33 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Actually I see Obama as more global. Think about it.

That's not a slam at him, that's actually a feature, and a strong point. But it doesn't help him relate to Joe Sixpack.


Yes, but konolia, where does it say that "relating to Joe Sixpack" is a qualification for office? If you put most senators, governors, etc under that sort of scrutiny, it wouldn't hold up for any of them, either. (Insert snarky comments about how many houses McCain has, how much money John Kerry has, how George Bush "earned" a living before becoming president with the help of his dad's pals, etc).

I'd argue that, in coming down off the pedestal that is an Ivy League education to work in the inner city, as Obama did, puts him much more in touch with the lives, thoughts and needs of the average worker/American than the vast majority of elected officials.
posted by bitter-girl.com at 2:34 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


in other words, the only people who actually could have made a decision to protect Bristol's privacy were her parents. If they cared that much about her, she should have turned down the vice-presidency.

So...people who care about their children don't run for national office? And in 1992, if Bill Clinton had really cared about his daughter, he wouldn't have run?
posted by dilettante at 2:35 PM on September 1, 2008


Not to derail, but seatbelt laws are something I do not like at all. I was in one truly major car accident in my life, when I was 12. My mother was driving and had her belt on. I did not have my belt on. The only reason I am alive today is because I did not have my belt on and was able to get into the back quickly enough to survive the telephone pole.

I'm a rational person, and I understand that fewer people die if everyone wears seatbelts. But it is a fact that if that law had existed, and I had obeyed it, I would not be alive to write about it. So that leaves me torn on that particular issue, me being one of those life-liking kind of people.

About the pregnant kid, meh, I'm with Obama on this one. There are all kinds of perfectly reasonable and indisputable reasons not to vote for her; using this situation as a weapon is A) not necessary; and B) exploiting this would be a very Republican thing to do and those are the folks I *don't* want to be like. As Democrats, we should rise above that and resist the temptation to use this is a political tool. Obama exercised more of that good judgment with his stance.
posted by jamstigator at 2:40 PM on September 1, 2008


And in 1992, if Bill Clinton had really cared about his daughter, he wouldn't have run?

Not necessarily, but if she were an unmarried pregnant teenager whose actions were a rejection of significant chunk of the Democratic party PR machine, the Republicans would never have stopped talking about it long enough to have time for impeachment proceedings.
posted by troybob at 2:42 PM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


Speaking of the Obama is a muslim thing, there's a new one brewing.

Yeah, the title Atlas Shrugs certainly makes me take that blog seriously.
posted by lukemeister at 2:48 PM on September 1, 2008


scody: "That's right. All 80,000 people at Mile High and all 38 million viewers on TV have commented in this thread, and each of them was peddling the baby rumors!"

Seeing my Firefox creak and groan under the weight of rendering this discussion, that statement doesn't seem too far from the truth...
posted by Rhaomi at 2:52 PM on September 1, 2008


It's about 60 days until the election. Decisions about the war in Iraq are obviously among the bigger decisions to come.

Could even a single page be produced with Sarah Palin's ideas (not her son or his signing up) about how the war got started, how it progressed, how it should end, and so forth?

I know Biden has said a lot about it. If Sarah's going to possibly be vice president, I would hope that she's at least got enough ideas about it to fill a page or two at the very least.
posted by cashman at 2:53 PM on September 1, 2008


And if Sarah Palin had taken responsibility to teach her daughter about birth control, she wouldn't be pregnant in the first place.

what else have you learned from your wiretaps of their house? you have no idea what her and her daughter talked about or if she did use birth control and it failed, so you can quit talking as if you do
posted by pyramid termite at 2:56 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


And if Sarah Palin had taken responsibility to teach her daughter about birth control, she wouldn't be pregnant in the first place. That to me is the huge irony about pro-lifers.

DAMN it Delmoi, I can't believe you wrote that. What the fuck do you know about what Sarah Palin personally taught her kid? Or whether her daughter did use contraception and it failed??

I would venture to guess, and I know something of conservatives, that the majority of anti-sex-ed-distributing-condoms-in-schools, abstinence-only folks DO tell their kids to use protection IF they decide to have sex. (The stakes are higher for them, after all, as they oppose abortion.) They just don't want teen sex implicitly sanctioned at school--they want to talk to their own kids. (And yes, I personally emphatically support school sex education. I just understand how some people see things differently.)

You assume that Sarah Palin's daughter, daughter of a conservative state governor, never having heard of condoms because her mother withheld the information from her, had unprotected sex. 17 years old, poor thing, and she'd never heard of a condom. Her pregnancy is her mother's fault. What do you actually know about any of that, and how is it your business again?

There is no direct line here from the public to the private. Opposing sex ed in school does not exclude family guidance in the area, and your assumptions are just way out of line.
posted by torticat at 2:57 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


by the way, does anyone think that this would have been a big as story if her 17 year old son had gotten someone pregnant? do you think the "white trash" comments would have started up on this thread, just as they did after her pregnancy was mentioned? is this some kind of politically correct way of calling her a slut?

i think there's a little boyzone misogyny going on here
posted by pyramid termite at 3:03 PM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


the majority of anti-sex-ed-distributing-condoms-in-schools, abstinence-only folks DO tell their kids to use protection IF they decide to have sex

The fact that you believe this explains a lot about your views.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 3:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


...abstinence-only folks DO tell their kids to use protection IF they decide to have sex...

You might want to reconsider your definition of the word 'only.'
posted by troybob at 3:04 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Mr. Obama said the pregnancy “has no relevance to Governor Palin’s performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president.” He added that, “my mother had me when she was 18. How a family deals with issues and teen-age children — that shouldn’t be the topic of our politics.”

“So,” he added, “I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories.”
Absolute class and too damn right. I love this man so much, I'd vote for him twice if only I could. Or, you know, lived in Florida.
posted by DarlingBri at 3:05 PM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


...not that I think Palin's daughter was not necessarily taught about birth control...but I envision it more in sense of how the strict anti-abortionist, in legal times or not, can invariably get her hands on the phone number for that special doctor to call when her daughter gets 'in trouble'...
posted by troybob at 3:08 PM on September 1, 2008


by the way, does anyone think that this would have been a big as story if her 17 year old son had gotten someone pregnant?

Yes, but with the added discussion of how there is a double standard for boys in that situation. I don't think she would necessarily have been accused with carrying his child, however, so it kind of balances out.
posted by troybob at 3:15 PM on September 1, 2008


which might be an instructive visualization if 19 people decided elections

Yeah, they're decided by nine people. Duh.
posted by EarBucket at 3:20 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


by the way, does anyone think that this would have been a big as story if her 17 year old son had gotten someone pregnant?

The "Track got a girl pregnant" story isn't scheduled to come out until Friday. The narrative will be like this: 9/11/08 right before shipping off to Iraq he'll marry the mother. The ceremony might happen at Ground Zero if they can get the logistics worked out.
posted by birdherder at 3:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


GOP VP pick Sarah Palin laughs at cancer surviving senator being called a "bitch"
posted by acro at 3:22 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I would venture to guess, and I know something of conservatives, that the majority of anti-sex-ed-distributing-condoms-in-schools, abstinence-only folks DO tell their kids to use protection IF they decide to have sex.

Therefore: 1) they are not teaching abstinence-only to their own children, while 2) demanding that other people's children be taught the type of misinformation they don't pass on to their own kids.

Wow. That's family values, all right: "I value my family more than I value yours."
posted by scody at 3:24 PM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


To summarize, Sarah Palin doesn't have any foreign policy experience (beyond a proximity to Russia), may have been barely vetted by McCain (or may have been the choice of a right wing cabal), is currently involved in an ethics scandal involving using her office to punish her ex-brother-in-law, is anti-polar bear, has less than two years of experience as governor, doesn't actually command the Alaskan National Guard, actually supported the bridge to nowhere initially (though she stopped supporting it when it became politically expedient to do so), didn't know what the duties of the vice president were as of a month ago, and is less qualified to be VP than most of the rest of the Republican party.

Furthermore, this appears to be a cynical move on McCain's part to appeal to a very specific part of the Republican base, as opposed to a sober choice that will allow for the best possible person to run the country in the event of his death - which we should be concerned about because he is 72 and has had cancer several times. Also, she may have been chosen to lure some former Clinton supporters over in the hopes that they won't notice that her views are entirely different from Clinton's - a view that is supported by a quick visit to the PUMA message boards.

Also, she may be associated with an Alaskan Separatist movement, doesn't know when the Pledge of Allegiance was written, and has publicly called Hillary a whiner, her cancer survivor opponent "a cancer," and Ted Stevens a great dude.

Anyhow, as near as I can tell there are at least a dozen really meaty points to attack McCain on - if this was his choice of VP, what does it say about his judgement?

This, my friends, is the meat here. Go after McCain. Go after his judgement. Focus on McCain. Focusing on anything else scores points for the other team.

McCain had the choice to pick somebody qualified to be President of the United States. Instead, he picked somebody imminently unqualified for the position. That speaks worse of McCain than it does of Palin.

It's McCain, stupid.
posted by Joey Michaels at 3:30 PM on September 1, 2008 [41 favorites]


Q: Are you offended by the phrase "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance? Why or why not?

PALIN: Not on your life. If it was good enough for the founding fathers, its good enough for me and I’ll fight in defense of our Pledge of Allegiance.


Via. I don't like the way Sullivan handled this at all but, wow. Seriously? Could we have Biden and Palin debate every night from now to November? Please? Locked together like two rats chewing each others tails - which never stop growing.
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 3:31 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Oh, apparently that's old news.
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 3:33 PM on September 1, 2008


I can't believe the whole privacy-violation and misogyny charges are still being thrown about. Palin is running a campaign based on who she is, because she cannot run on experience. When she was first announced, the Republican line was all about how her big advantage was "her story" and how inspiring it is. If she is going to do that, she does not have the benefit of claiming that some parts of "her story" are off limits. She sold herself based on her life and her choices, and so she has opened them up for discussion.

Also, she brings to the whole platform a focus on reproductive rights and family values, so the way those issues have played out in her own life is fair game. One of her goals is taking away abortion as a choice; many women would consider that an invasion of privacy far worse than the consequences of her wholly voluntary candidacy and willingness to be subject to the kind of scrutiny that every national-level politician is afforded.
posted by troybob at 3:35 PM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


I find this all to be a distraction, albeit a deliciously trashy one. Politically, Obama can't win by going after a teenage unwed mother, even if it points out the hypocrisy of the religious right or the failure of abstinence-only sex education or whatever. It's still too-easily spun as anti-family values, or as picking on someone's private life, or as dragging a teenager girl into an international political spotlight she doesn't belong in. I will personally keep tabs on stories like this coming out of the Palin family, and privately discuss them with barely contained glee, because who doesn't enjoy some juicy, Grace Metalious-style scuttlebutt?

Palin is not the issue; she's a distraction from the issue, and a potential minefield. Obama can't argue against her inexperience, because to do so would highlight his own inexperience (although her selection also effectively takes discussion of his experience off the table). All that's important is that she would be a representative of McCain's presidency, and that's the real target, and it's going to be a problem for her. In debate, she is going to have to defend his record and his policies, and that's going to be a problem for her, because she doesn't really know them, and may not agree with them.

Everything else takes away from this discussion, and it needs not to, because that's the discussion that will win Obama the election.
posted by Astro Zombie at 3:39 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


"let's not make this big election about small things"
...B. Obama

That's it. Discussing anything else is beneath you, and beneath your candidate.
...Billyfleetwood

Oh, so you've decided that we can't discuss anything about Sarah Palin except McCain's judgment in picking her? I've got news for you, The Today show is going to discuss how cute her baby is, and the Oprah show is going to discuss her choice in eyewear, and People magazine is going to write about her marriage, and Christian Weekly is going to talk about her church attendance, and Guns & Ammo is going to talk about her hunting trips.

We all want to know more about this Woman Who Would Be King in waiting and since she is a virtual unknown, there will be a lot to discover AND discuss.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 3:41 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


> Opposing sex ed in school does not exclude family guidance in the area, and your assumptions are just way out of line.

The problem is the family guidance can be wrong and poorly informed, if it happens at all. It is a privilege to have the time and resources for a parent to be able to do the research and provide any insightful information to their children other than sound bites they heard on tv such as you can get aids from tears. Of course, public libraries are now fighting to be able to keep books on their shelves that have relevant information about sex ed, so parents and children can educate themselves about the subject matter.

The outrage I have with the abstinence-only education, and the actions of Palin, are that they have continually demonstrated a classist approach to sexual health. If you are well off, rich in terms of strong social networks and education, even a teen pregnancy will not stop you. Hell, my cousin was raised by my (very well off, and very Republican) grandparents because my uncle knocked up his highschool sweetheart at 18. My uncle went away to college, the mother did too, and my cousin was raised by loving (grand)parents. And my dad has a little brother all of a sudden when he was 14.

Public access to sexual health information is a matter of a public health, not a matter of morals or politics. Syphilis and other STDs are seeing a spike in the last 7 years, as kids are still having sex, just now they don't know what the hell they are doing.
posted by mrzarquon at 3:44 PM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


DAMN it Delmoi, I can't believe you wrote that. What the fuck do you know about what Sarah Palin personally taught her kid? Or whether her daughter did use contraception and it failed??

Um, I'm assuming that she's been honest when she talks about what kind of sex education is appropriate. Are you saying she's a lying hypocrite who supports abstinence only sex-ed publicly but wants her own children to know how to use contraceptives?

And yeah, fine I don't really know what went on in the privacy of Sarah Palin's home, but I do know that if she followed her own public policies she wouldn't have taught her daughter about contraceptives.

The alternative is that she's a hypocrite.

Like I said, it's not a political attack, but it's important to point out why these policies are bad ideas. I don't think it's unreasonable to even discuss the situation. I do think the people spouting the whole "Bristol is Trig's Mother" theory were totally crazy.
posted by delmoi at 3:51 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Yeah, Obama has class, sadly, some who profess to like the man, like the sewer. This is classic reverse psychology, some here on MeFi are being assholes to make Barak look like an asshole. Remember the rabid hateful 'lets build a straw man' MeFi's who seek to make Obama reprehensible to others are trying to do just that. Make us feel disgusted about the whole thing.
No change. Politics as usual. Personal destruction.
Reject the muck. We are, most of us, above this sad shit smear 'campaign'.
posted by dawson at 4:00 PM on September 1, 2008


Two days ago, that is two days before Palin and McCain told the press about Bristol’s pregnancy, a commenter by the name of 'Sue Williams' got all the private details of the story right on the Mudflats Alaskan politics blog. She claimed to live in the same town as the Palins and that she is close with the "inner circle" of Palin family friends.

Of course everyone was so obsessed with the Trig cover-up fake pregnancy narrative at the time, that she was angrily dismissed as a liar. Well it’s pretty hard to think that now!

If you ctrl+F all her posts in that thread, this is some juicy insider gossip. Williams tells the story of an ordinary small town mom and her surreal streak of political serendipity, that could take her from podunk town mayor to the most powerdul leader in the world in just a handful of years. Sue Williams:
I live in this Valley. I know the Heath/Palin families. I am a proud Republican. And I’m a conservative.



We all - every single one of us - even Sarah’s closest friends in the Valley (I know, I’ve been speaking to them) know she is in no way qualified for this position. At all.[*]



[H]er mayoral races were like a stroll through the park on a hot summer day. Her dad has basically taught everyone out here when they were in middle school science. She won her last mayoral race with less than 1,000 votes. It takes more than that to win a seat on the Valley’s school board.

What hasn’t been reported, at least not much, is that she was unemployed for almost three years before becoming gov. So, people talk about how she was gov for two years - make that 20 months. And before that? Unemployed for almost three years. She ran for mayor on a line of Positively Palin. Everyone knew her and her family. It wasn’t a nasty race.

The race for gov wasn’t exactly “nasty” either. She played the sympathy card constantly. It’s weird how people who aren’t paying attention will fall for it.

She ran for gov against the LEAST LIKED GOV IN THE UNION. His positive numbers were single digits. The local dog catcher could have run and won. Come on, people. This IS Alaska. She won b/c she got in the race so early and I think it kept more qualified people out. Also, the former gov took forever to decide if he’d run for reelection. If he hadn’t, the other guy on the Rep. side would have walked away with the win easily. But, the old gov and the other guy - John Binkley, who was the favorite in the business/thinking community - didn’t count on Sarah being served up no scrutiny in the press. The local press just ran pictures of her and whatdoyaknow? She won. And now she’ll apparently be VP and possilbly president.

[*] This assertion is substantiated by recent comments from Palin’s own mother-in-law:
Faye Palin said the entire family was shocked by the news on Friday.

"I'm not sure what she brings to the ticket other than she's a woman and a conservative.”

posted by dgaicun at 4:01 PM on September 1, 2008 [36 favorites]


Torticat is it your fucking job to come in here, guns blazing, to scold everybody every few minutes?
What the fuck. Chillax.

Palin is on record as being AGAINST birth control. Against Abortion (hence against choice). And against premarital sex. She is on record favoring POLICY that will restrict OTHER peoples rights in regards to these issues.

So in your rather obnoxious and over scolding opinion we can't hold her accountable for the obvious inconsistencies in both her private life and public policy positions. Those very inconsistencies are the clear trademark of those that chronically abuse power.
posted by tkchrist at 4:06 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


We are, most of us, above this sad shit smear 'campaign'.

Making a mistake when you're 17 isn't something one can be "smeared" with, unless you're the typical hypocritical, judgmental, old-testament-for-thee-but-not-for-me member of the religiously Republican Right.

The absolute, unspun, objective truth, especially about our politicians who a charged with ORDERING OUR PUBLIC SOCIETY VIA LEGISLATION AND JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS, is never a smear.
posted by troy at 4:16 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


dgaicun, thanks for that link. Truly that's the best of the web - a commenter who shares Sarah Palin's doctor, who knows things from inside the town. A voice we'd have never heard from in decades past without some kind of intervening by media who would distort the voice. I like this part particularly:

These are what we call “bumper sticker” citizens. If an idea is too long for a bumper sticker, it’s too complicated for them to try and wrap their minds around.

Great stuff in there. Fascinating, and the poster is specific and clear and the accounts seem earnest, unsensational and believable.
posted by cashman at 4:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


The "Track got a girl pregnant" story isn't scheduled to come out until Friday.
And here I was guessing it was more like the "Track doesn't like girls" story. Not because I have a shred of evidence but only because it pairs up nicely with the "abstinence-only" mother being graced with an unwed, teenage mother.

The outrage I have with the abstinence-only education, and the actions of Palin, are that they have continually demonstrated a classist approach to sexual health.

Two months ago, when I read that the Bush administration was seeking to reclassify birth control pills as abortifactants, I had to look at Laura Bush and wonder how she managed her small family without taking The Pill. Tubes tied? No sex for W? Prayer? Surgery for little W? And what of her newly married daughter-- will she be producing an heir this year? When our government makes rules on our sex/procreation lives, it is fair to ask how they manage their own personal lives.

Just remember that we can outlaw abortions and birth control here, but that won't mean diddley squat to anyone with the price of an airline ticket to England or Japan. All that means is the poor can choose between a sex life OR paying the bills. Don't you just love the idea of living in a country where only the wealthy can afford to have sex?
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 4:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


troy,
what I meant was the desperation to pin something 'dirty' on Palin. I mean so far we have a husbands 25 year-old DUI, some old stuff with a cop acting out, a teenage pregnancy and 'no foreign policy' experience.
Not you per se, but obviously some are desperate to smear Sarah Palin.
I can't imagine how this would help dems, so it must be 'free agents' of the rabid 'republican' brand. I just really don't want to think that people who wanna see Obama elected would get near any of this, 'cast the first stone at Palin omg eleventy!!!' movement.
posted by dawson at 4:28 PM on September 1, 2008


And on top of that, relates the importance of the information.
Apparently that’s what blind ambition does for you, folks. It blinds you to the hearts and needs and lives and emotions and futures of everyone around you - incl. your own daughter who, God only knows how she’ll bear up under the shock and shame when this story finally comes out.

No thank you. I would like a VP candidate who puts the lives of the people she’s supposed to be caring for first, above her own. Since, for social reasons (abortion and gay issues) I can’t in my conscience vote for Obama, I’ll show up in the booth this Nov and vote for congressional races then slip out before casting a vote for people who have no business being given the responsibility and honor of running our nation.

This whole thing is sick. Sick.
I disagree with the "social reasons" thing and I'd like to talk about the "single page" idea instead of the stuff about her daughter. But it's an inside look into the inner workings of the town, the government and the potential VP's decisions that seems like rare and unique information.
posted by cashman at 4:31 PM on September 1, 2008


dawson, what are you talking about -- the DWI story was released by the campaign, unbidden. The troopergate story is all over the news in alaska and has been for months.

Also (saw this at Reason):
45: number of months Sarah Palin has been pregnant
20: number of months Sarah Palin has been governor

9,000: population of Wasilla, AK the town of which Palin was mayor
15,000: the number of people at the rally announcing her nomination as VP

7: number of people in the Palin family
7: number of houses John and Cindy McCain own

72: years that John McCain has been alive
49: years that Alaska has been a state

1: number of times McCain and Palin had met before today
20 million: the number of dollars that the city of Wasilla was left in
debt when Palin's term as mayor ended

When John McCain started his campaign, Sarah Palin was not yet governor of Alaska.

John McCain left both his first wife and Mitt Romney for beauty queens.
posted by empath at 4:32 PM on September 1, 2008 [17 favorites]


> Tubes tied?

Fun vignette growing up: I found out my dad convinced his very large company he was a manager for, to cover sterilization while their catholic based health insurance provided did not. He did it on the grounds that it was cheaper for them to provide the surgery to those who wanted it than it would be to cover the expense of the ma/paternity leaves.
posted by mrzarquon at 4:34 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


empath,
I guess what I'm talking about is that if 'all' this is the best 'they' have against Sarah Palin, well they ain't got much. I'm seeing nada about policy and real political problems (and being a conservative is a strength, not a problem for the GOP veep nominee) except the nebulous 'lack of foreign policy experience'.
posted by dawson at 4:39 PM on September 1, 2008


dawson, I tend to agree with this.

But: I am reminded of Kerry bringing up Cheney's lesbian daughter and the violent pout-storm that erupted among the Republicans above that.

"HOW DARE YOU expose our structural moral hypocrisy!"

It's not an attempt to smear Palin to get to the bottom of the dismissed public officer thing, either.

The would-be occupants of the highest executive office in this country must be held to the highest moral standards.

President Bush willfully lying to the country to force the Congress to go to sign-off on his war ought to be a sufficient example of the dangers of electing self-involved NPD moral deficients.

If Kerry had indeed shot himself to get out of 'Nam the whole Swift Boat thing wouldn't have been a smear, but as I said above exposing objective truth is never a smear.
posted by troy at 4:45 PM on September 1, 2008


George Lakoff: The Palin Choice and the Reality of the Political Mind
posted by homunculus at 4:50 PM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


dawson -- everything you've seen so far has been pushed by random bloggers doing google searches and local alaskan's doing infodumps. I haven't seen anything that looks like oppo-research yet. The Obama campaign will come up with better attacks in a few days, I'm sure. They'll likely take it easy until after the convention is over.
posted by empath at 4:59 PM on September 1, 2008


Sarah Palin hired an attorney to defend her in the TrooperGate scandal today.
posted by msalt at 5:04 PM on September 1, 2008


[McCain] picked somebody imminently unqualified for the position.

That's hilarious, given the timing of these rumors.
posted by ryanrs at 5:10 PM on September 1, 2008


I would like a VP candidate who puts the lives of the people she’s supposed to be caring for first, above her own.

sorry, but at that level of politics, it's not going to happen - unless something extreme happens, a politician's family is going to be playing second fiddle to the campaign or the office - one has to have an ego the size of a mack truck to run for vpres or pres and yeah, i include obama in that statement

it's just what it takes to win this game
posted by pyramid termite at 5:10 PM on September 1, 2008


what I meant was the desperation to pin something 'dirty' on Palin. I mean so far we have a husbands 25 year-old DUI, some old stuff with a cop acting out, a teenage pregnancy and 'no foreign policy' experience. -- dawson

Uh no, we have a story where Sarah Palin fired the head of the Alaska State Troupers because he wouldn't in turn fire a cop over some "old stuff". Then she lied about it. The woman is going to be deposed under oath about this in the next few weeks. This was and is a pretty major scandal up there.
posted by delmoi at 5:18 PM on September 1, 2008


But: I am reminded of Kerry bringing up Cheney's lesbian daughter

That was actually John Edwards, in the 2004 VP debate.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 5:18 PM on September 1, 2008


I think y'all are very wrong if you think this story is going to be about liberal bloggers saying nasty things about the Palins. Her daughter's pregnancy is one thread in a very thick rope that is right now being knotted into a noose for the McCain campaign's neck. Get out of the echo chamber and look at the media. They aren't interested in blaming liberal bloggers ... they are interested in finding out what other kind of shit they can find on Palin, and they are trying to figure out why the McCain campaign didn't find out first.

McCain spokespeople are refusing to say what day of the week they found out about the pregnancy. That strongly suggests that McCain had no idea until after he picked her. And if you say, "well, it shouldn't matter, so why should he have known?" then you are buying into the Republican spin. They should have known because if they didn't, shit like this would happen.

Look, I am100% for gay rights, and if I learned that Joe Biden kept a secret gay love nest and didn't tell the Obama campaign about it, I'd be pissed at him. Because this is what happens.

My god, the woman just lawyered up.

Also, Karl Rove is a very smart man, but he isn't Lex Luthor, and this isn't some beautiful con game. This is a big-time fuck-up.
posted by Bookhouse at 5:20 PM on September 1, 2008


My without-a-particular-axe-to-grind friend Fred put together some fairly interesting assemblages of some MySpace pages that muddle this whole baby-marriage-family thing. I know it's all people saying "well this sort of looks like it might be sketch..." and staring sideways at an undated photograph, but was pretty much ignoring most of that until this which just seems strange to me.
posted by jessamyn at 5:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Sarah Palin hired an attorney to defend her in the TrooperGate scandal today.

Anchorage attorney Thomas V. Van Flein has requested a copy of all witness statements and documentary evidence from the Legislature's investigator, Stephen Branchflower. Sen. Hollis French, an Anchorage Democrat, says he instructed Branchflower not to comply with the request.

Wait, WTF? IANAL but isn't this, like, discovery? Aren't they required to hand this stuff over? Don't people in the US still have a right to see the evidence against them in preparing a defence?
posted by DarlingBri at 5:24 PM on September 1, 2008


Just as I predicted upthread: Hillary Clinton will be dropping the hammer on Palin:
Advisers to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton said on Sunday that Senator John McCain’s selection of Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska as his running mate would lead to a greater role for Mrs. Clinton as she campaigned this fall on behalf of her former rival, Senator Barack Obama.

Mrs. Clinton’s friends said she was galled that Ms. Palin might try to capitalize on a movement that Mrs. Clinton, of New York, built among women in the primaries.
Oh yes, it's on.

Look, the Obama camp has been working furiously to stay on-message. Their response ad to Palin's selection is dominated by shots of Bush with only a single one showing Palin, and Obama's statement telling reporters to lay off the Bristol Palin story reinforces the direction they're trying to steer the campaign back into. The truth of the matter is that Palin adds precious little to the ticket: she does nothing to shore up McCain's weakness on the economy (unless you think governing a state where 80%+ of the budget comes from oil revenues and a hefty chunk of the rest comes from the highest levels of per-capita federal subsidies will give Palin any particular insight on core economic issues dominating the lower 48, such as the mortgage crisis), and by now it's obvious that her selection casts serious doubts on McCain's judgment and commitment toward sound governing. Palin is far from the mainstream on social issues, especially her stance against abortion even in the case of rape and incest. Many women had still mistakenly believed that McCain was pro-choice, but Palin helps to put the final nail in that misconception. I still believe that Palin's greatest threat to the Democrats is the potential backlash against any unfair personal attacks or even poorly-phrased throwaway comments, and that's why it's even more important than ever than Democrats need to stay totally on-message and remain focused on policy while zeroing in on Bush/McCain. The human interest stories surrounding Palin will largely die down in a week or two, and once that's passed she'll have an uphill fight to pass the credulity test.

I'm actually glad to see the God-and-guns crowd enthused about Palin. They were never going to vote for Obama anyway, and in the end the Republicans would've done something or other to rabble-rouse them to the polls. It's better that their attention and enthusiasm are focused positively on a female role model (to them) than on yet another wedge gay marriage ballot initiative or ludicrous Muslim smear. At the end of the day, it's better for the country to have conservatives come out in broad daylight and proudly support the issues they believe in and have their say, too. The more that things are played out aboveboard, the more likely that the better candidate with the better policies will win. We're in a very delicate moment in this campaign, and those who truly believe in Obama's message need to be following his lead right now.
posted by DaShiv at 5:27 PM on September 1, 2008 [29 favorites]


That was actually John Edwards, in the 2004 VP debate.


Kerry and Edwards both mentioned it, but only Kerry caught flack for it, for whatever reason.
My without-a-particualr-axe-to-grind friend Fred put together some fairly interesting assemblages of some MySpace pages that muddle this whole baby-marriage-family thing. -- jessamyn
Oh my god no, that person is seriously out to lunch:
came across a link to the Myspace page, and was shocked at what I discovered. In a series of photographic captions, Sadie, brother of Levi, describes Sarah Palin as the mother-in-law of Trig. Furthermore, she cites Bristol Palin as her sister-in-law.
The caption of the photos call Sarah the "Mother in law" but who's mother in law? Well think abou it. Sadie is Levi's sister, and Levi is Bristol's fiance. that means Sarah will be Sadie's mother in law! and it means that Bristol will be her Sister in Law Exactly like the captions say!

There is nothing inconsistent with those captions!
posted by delmoi at 5:28 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Um, DaShiv? I love you. Also, please run for public office.
posted by scody at 5:30 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Wait, WTF? IANAL but isn't this, like, discovery? Aren't they required to hand this stuff over? Don't people in the US still have a right to see the evidence against them in preparing a defence?

it's a legislative, rather then court proceeding.
posted by delmoi at 5:33 PM on September 1, 2008


I am cynical enough to think that shrewd rovian disinformation operatives probably began the more extreme rumors careening through the blogosphere as a way to get the uncomfortable news out and create a sympathetic backlash against liberals. They have proven masterful about launching large scale spins that turn positives into negatives and negatives into positives so it is not inconceivable that they did so in this case too.

Bingo!
posted by ericb at 5:34 PM on September 1, 2008


The caption of the photos call Sarah the "Mother in law" but who's mother in law? Well think abou it. Sadie is Levi's sister, and Levi is Bristol's fiance. that means Sarah will be Sadie's mother in law! and it means that Bristol will be her Sister in Law Exactly like the captions say!

Further, the in the third caption, Sadie describes Trig as her BROTHER. If it was the son of her brother and Bristol, it would be her nephew. This MySpace thing is a whole lot of nothing.
posted by kimdog at 5:36 PM on September 1, 2008


This MySpace thing is a whole lot of nothing.

not only that, it would be real easy to fake by changing the captions

*deletes from hard drive*
posted by pyramid termite at 5:40 PM on September 1, 2008


Obama's speech last night was incredibly moving. America, such an amazing, wonderful place, would do well to elect Obama. He is the dream realized.


Oh, FFS! Politics will never get any better until the voters become more cynical than the politicans.
posted by ZenMasterThis at 5:40 PM on September 1, 2008


The page Jessamyn linked to is gone now. What happened?
posted by Locative at 5:41 PM on September 1, 2008


She specifically calls Trig 'my new baby brother'. If it were Bristol's kid, she'd have said 'nephew'. OTOH, she writes as if they're already married? There is still something weird about the whole situation, but at this point, I don't think I want to know any more about it.
posted by empath at 5:42 PM on September 1, 2008


I am reminded of Kerry bringing up Cheney's lesbian daughter
Wow, no wonder she turned out that way!
posted by lukemeister at 5:42 PM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


Obama's speech last night was incredibly moving. America, such an amazing, wonderful place, would do well to elect Obama. He is the dream realized.


Oh, FFS! Our only hope of saving this country is for the people become more cynical than the politicans they vote for. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to step outside and puke for a moment.
posted by ZenMasterThis at 5:42 PM on September 1, 2008


Oops, sorry 'bout the double ... thought my browser time-out on the first one.
posted by ZenMasterThis at 5:43 PM on September 1, 2008


timed
posted by ZenMasterThis at 5:44 PM on September 1, 2008


pyramid termite: do you think the "white trash" comments would have started up on this thread,

Just for the record (since this thread is so damn long) note that this is a total of two "white trash" comments so far, out of
~1750 comments at this point. There have actually been several more comments protesting that label than using it.
posted by XMLicious at 5:49 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


McCain clinched the nomination on March 4. He's had almost six months to pick a running mate, and this is the best he could do?

Kerry and Edwards both mentioned it, but only Kerry caught flack for it, for whatever reason.

Edwards said, "[the Cheneys] have a gay daughter" in the VP debate and it was no big deal. (Cheney even said, "let me simply thank the senator for the kind words he said about my family and our daughter.") Kerry said, "if you were to talk to Dick Cheney's daughter, who is a lesbian, she would tell you that she's being who she was, she's being who she was born as" in the third presidential debate and the Cheneys freaked out, apparently because Kerry used the word "lesbian."
posted by kirkaracha at 5:54 PM on September 1, 2008


I would like to point out the fact that I was merely saying that I thought the media narrative on her would be that she was white trash, not that I personally thought she was white trash.
posted by empath at 6:00 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Joey Michaels -- you're spot on!
posted by ericb at 6:00 PM on September 1, 2008


The page Jessamyn linked to is gone now. What happened?

maybe the guy read my comment in the moderation queue and just decided to delete the article.

Basically someone had gone through Bristol's future husband's sister's myspace page and got confused by a caption calling Sarah Palin her "mother in law". It didn't make much sense. I actually saved a copy but it's really not worth reposting.
posted by delmoi at 6:06 PM on September 1, 2008


Oh and by the way Obama's gotten an 8-9 point bounce in the polls post convention. And these polls will mostly be from before the Palin train wreak.
posted by delmoi at 6:07 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Obama is like the guy who spends hours online looking for the right car, test drives them, figures out the car he wants, haggles with the dealer and finance guys for so long his wife starts to get very testy. Eventually he drives off with a decent, safe car at a reasonable price, the sort of car the neighbors think isn't too exciting, but it's clearly the right choice. Kids booster seats fit in back, decent mileage, and free floor mats he demanded at the very end or else he walked.

McCain is like the guy who knows he needs to replace his car, does a little research, test drives them, and just when you think he has it figured out, he sees that hot sports car over there.

It is BEAUTIFUL. Ford Mustang Shelby GT, 500 HP, 0-60 in 4.6. And it's a convertible, too!

So he immediately walks over to the sales manager and demands it. The sales manager throws out an obscene price, and the guy says "Deal!"

He drives it home. Wife shakes her head. Where do the booster seats go? Booster seats? Honey, this goes 0-60 in 4.6! How much did you pay? He tells her. But you could have bought two unexciting cars for that! That wouldn't be exciting, honey, don't you see, this is about ME getting EXCITEMENT and SHAKING THINGS UP!

After sleeping on the couch for a week, he takes it back, pays a penalty, and then buys a minivan.

I think we'll see the same thing soon: McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests.
posted by dw at 6:11 PM on September 1, 2008 [26 favorites]


McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests.

Heh. But as much as this would amuse me (particularly the part where Romney gets a DVD player implanted into his head), I think that scenario basically announces to the world: "Hey everybody, look! I fucked up my very first 'presidential' decision! Don't you feel confident more confident than ever in voting for me?"

MCCAIN/PALINROMNEY '08: WE'LL KICK YOUR ASS AT DO-OVERS!
posted by scody at 6:17 PM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


> McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests

I sure hope so.

How else am I going to move all these "McCain/Romney 08: a house for every wife" bumperstickers.
posted by mrzarquon at 6:17 PM on September 1, 2008 [9 favorites]


Don't you feel confident more confident than ever

SCODY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REDUNDANCY DEPARTMENT

posted by scody at 6:21 PM on September 1, 2008


DaShiv: Word
posted by the_bone at 6:22 PM on September 1, 2008


ow else am I going to move all these "McCain/Romney 08: a house for every wife" bumperstickers.

So what *IS* the whole child/house ratio of the McCain/Palin ticket looking light now?
posted by Artw at 6:25 PM on September 1, 2008


After sleeping on the couch for a week, he takes it back, pays a penalty, and then buys a minivan.

I think we'll see the same thing soon: McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests.


I love the analogy, dw, but I think Sarah's here to stay. Aint nobody excited about Romney. I don't think the republicans can switch VP candidates now. It would say too much about McCain's judgement, and they would lose a lot of things they gained with her. This assessment seems to ring true. It's never going to be about the realities of today. It's going to be some symbolic, emotional thing that reality, logic, thinking cannot touch, if only for a few days. It's been fear. Now it'll be some other emotion that supplants calm, rational evaluation. Or hell, maybe it'll still be fear.
posted by cashman at 6:27 PM on September 1, 2008


Errr, this assessment.
posted by cashman at 6:29 PM on September 1, 2008


It's been fear. Now it'll be some other emotion that supplants calm, rational evaluation.

Yep. I'd be surprised ("shocked") if when/ Homeland Security raises the "threat level" to "orange" or "red" over the next two months!
posted by ericb at 6:33 PM on September 1, 2008


McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests.

then at midnight everything will go *poof* and he'll find out that he's stuck with a lousy amc gremlin
posted by pyramid termite at 6:34 PM on September 1, 2008


It's going to be some symbolic, emotional thing that reality, logic, thinking cannot touch, if only for a few days.

cashman -- you are right. It's right from the 'Rovian Playbook.' Shift the focus from the "rational" to the "emotional." Appeal to basic desires/interests and obfuscate everything else. Heck, many Americans voted against their best interests (primarily economic) in the past two campaigns, since they fell for the "gay agenda will sink America" subterfuge, etc.
posted by ericb at 6:40 PM on September 1, 2008


Yeah. DaShiv nailed it.

Palin is in a world of hurt thinking she can take on the Clintons.

Say what you want about Hillary but she is one ruthless, tough, smart, mother fucker. If Palin thinks she is gonna just co-opt Hildogs jargon and skip merrily off with Clinton's women voters with out a fight? She is out of her frost-and-tipped little mind.

Still. I think McCain is gonna squeak by this election. I think we still got an October surprise down the pike, Diebold, and the democrats penchant for fuckiing themselves to contend with... though this Palin thing does give me hope.
posted by tkchrist at 6:42 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Further, the in the third caption, Sadie describes Trig as her BROTHER. If it was the son of her brother and Bristol, it would be her nephew. This MySpace thing is a whole lot of nothing.

It's nothing anymore with today's announcement of Bristol Palin's pregnancy and future marriage, but if the announcement would not have been made, this MySpace page would have leaked not that Bristol is pregnant per se, but the telling fact that she is engaged at 16/17.

I endeavored to imagine how the absurdity might increase - I think the discovery of an old 4chan camwhoring thread with low-res blurry pics of a girl who is either Bristol Palin or a lookalike and notes in the text that she's from Alaska would be pretty lulzy.
posted by TheOnlyCoolTim at 6:49 PM on September 1, 2008


Yeah, scody nails it; you don't change horses in mid-stream or VP candidates in September unless you have no other choice.

And as konolia's made clear, Palin energizes the base better than most anyone can (maybe Jindal, but he'd turn off white racists and anti-Catholics). Romney's not a great choice, as the Fundies fundamentally distrust Mormons, and the Evangelicals (rightly) see their proselytizing as a threat to market share.

McCain's made his (or as I suggested above, Karl Rove's) gamble, and McCain (who recently tried to insist on playing craps in Vegas despite his aids explaining that would look bad in a candidate) isn't going to ask for new cards.
posted by orthogonality at 6:52 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


If only Congress hadn't stopped the funding for the Texas Supercollider back in the roaring nineties, the Republicans could be using it to fuse Palin, Romney, and Cheney into a super-veep. PaCheRomlin - A pretty, tanned hermaphrodite Mormon Frankenstein who occasionally shoots people in the face. With foreign-policy superpowers due to Palin's Alaska-genes: PaCheRomlin would be able to clench a fist, sitting at a desk in Washington, and achieve the Darth-Vader-choke on Putin all the way over in Moscow.

And there would be ice breath too, to deal with global warming. But PaCheRomlin would have to be tricked into using the ice breath, since she doesn't believe in global warming.
posted by XMLicious at 7:05 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


(maybe Jindal, but he'd turn off white racists and anti-Catholics)

Isn't Palin catholic too? Or was she just raised catholic?
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 7:07 PM on September 1, 2008


Palin is or was a member of a fringe secessionist party desiring Alaskan independence. Nevermind that the state is 68% owned by the fed, who bought it from Russia. Do we have a traitor attempting to infiltrate our highest office?
posted by Brian B. at 7:07 PM on September 1, 2008


Oh, man, I think this was all part of McCain's gamble from the start. I have to assume he knew about this before he announced Palin. This pregnancy was the icing on the cake, because he knows this thing will last more than a couple of news cycles--it'll be a topic of discussion throughout the rest of the campaign. So at a bare minimum, McCain and Palin automatically make the front page news and the Dems can't touch it with a ten foot pole. Republicans understand that a large percentage of their base, and of working class independents respond to issues that hit on a visceral level. Many if not most working class families can relate to teenage pregnancy; many or most of those people are anti-choice, and this just reinforces that and brings abortion to the forefront of political debate. Which as Optimus Chyme put it so well: that's exactly what Republicans want. They don't want to talk about real issues, they want to dominate the media with this issue because it might fire up enough reptile hind-brains to get out and vote for McCain. Obama has to somehow get this story off the radar.

Maybe Joe Biden can rough up a convenience store robber or something?
posted by zardoz at 7:07 PM on September 1, 2008


“Weird new talking point from the McCain campaign. They're now saying that Sarah Palin, or perhaps we should now be calling her General Palin, is ‘Commander in Chief’ of the Alaska National Guard that is fighting in Iraq. I'm sure the governor is the de jure chief of the state's national guard, but to imply that she's somehow the equivalent of the Commander in Chief of the US military, direct Alaska's forces in the fight against Al Qaeda, running through war plans and launching rocket attacks, is just laughable. Don't take it from me. Take it from the general who runs the Alaska National Guard:
’Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard... said he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.’
Oops.

Th[e] interview…is simply astounding. CNN's Campbell Brown just obliterates McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds who simply refuses to answer, is unable to answer, the simple question as to what foreign policy experience Palin has. He couldn't name one decision she made as commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard.”*
posted by ericb at 7:10 PM on September 1, 2008 [7 favorites]


They don't want to talk about real issues, they want to dominate the media with this issue because it might fire up enough reptile hind-brains to get out and vote for McCain. Obama has to somehow get this story off the radar.

The biggest irony of this whole thing is that Obama being out of the news is a GOOD thing for him. Since Iowa, Obama has been the number one story of this election, and most of the coverage has been negative. This combined with the media's penchant for stirring up shit/getting everything wrong was not helping him one bit.

He just had an immensely successful convention, capped off by presenting his message to a record number of people. Instead of this weekend before the RNC being spent picking apart the past week, it's being spent setting up a bunch of negative storylines for the GOP.

Now that the spotlight is on someone else he can a) control his message even more, and b) work on his ground game, which has been pretty much ignored by the press anyway, despite being his main weapon towards winning this thing.

If Obama can lay low for the next two weeks, while everyone talks about Palin, it's a win for him.
posted by billyfleetwood at 7:25 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


ABC confirms--McCain vetting team just now heading to Alaska.

I know I keep saying this, but this is completely bugfuck insane. You just can't choose a running mate without vetting her first. Not just to tell you who you shouldn't choose, but to prepare you for what might pop up with the person you do pick. I guarantee you the Obama team knows the name of every woman Joe Biden's ever dated, every address he's ever lived at, how many freakin' hairs he has on his ass. There's a team of people designated to think like Karl Rove, coming up with lines of attack on Biden so that they can create effective counters for them before they ever come up. There's a similar team for Obama. Probably another one for Michelle.

It's been what, 72 hours since Palin's name was announced? And already we've found out that she has ties to a secessionist group, her teenage daughter's pregnant (allegedly by a 26 year old male), she's about to be deposed in an ongoing corruption scandal (she's just lawyered up today!), and she doesn't know what the Vice President's job is.

The Republican party ought to sue John McCain for political malpractice. If things were reversed, and this were happening with the Obama campaign, I'd be screaming, throwing things at my computer screen, and giving up on the election right now. It's absolutely inconceivable to me that a modern presidential campaign is being run like this.
posted by EarBucket at 7:27 PM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


Fifty buck on white power affiliations by Wednesday morning. Anyone want that action?
posted by The Straightener at 7:29 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


Fuzzy Skinner writes "But if it puts me on the same side as some of people posting here, I think I'd rather stay home."

That's pretty weak tea, an idea isn't responsible for the people who believe in it.

ThePinkSuperhero writes "Well, what else is there to do in Alaska?"

Fishing, hunting, running, skating (three kinds), swimming, biking, hiking, camping, nature photography, astronomy, shooting, skiing, and probably a thousand other outdoor activities that are readily available when you don't have to take two subways and a bus to see a tree. Plus of course reading, writing, surfing the web, watching tv/movies, driving, having coffee, playing pc/console games, assorted crafts and hobbies and other indoor activities available to American kids. To scratch the surface.
posted by Mitheral at 7:33 PM on September 1, 2008


Shit, I think we'll get the white power affiliations around 1:15PM tomorrow. By Wednesday morning, we're going to find out she's half-Martian.
posted by EarBucket at 7:33 PM on September 1, 2008


Isn't Palin catholic too? Or was she just raised catholic?

She may once have been Catholic, but she isn't now
.
posted by lukemeister at 7:34 PM on September 1, 2008


Her husband's an eighth Yupik; I'll take your bet
posted by jtron at 7:35 PM on September 1, 2008


we'll get the white power affiliations around1:15PM tomorrow.

That'd be awkward since her husband's only half white, if I remember right.
posted by small_ruminant at 7:35 PM on September 1, 2008


I hope note. Astro Zombies are required to vote a straight Martian ticket.
posted by Astro Zombie at 7:38 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


hope NOT.
posted by Astro Zombie at 7:43 PM on September 1, 2008


McCain will pick up the Romney with the power sliding doors and the DVD players in the headrests.
then at midnight everything will go *poof* and he'll find out that he's stuck with a lousy amc gremlin
Ron Paul?
posted by Flunkie at 7:46 PM on September 1, 2008


The Republican party ought to sue John McCain for political malpractice. If things were reversed, and this were happening with the Obama campaign, I'd be screaming, throwing things at my computer screen, and giving up on the election right now. It's absolutely inconceivable to me that a modern presidential campaign is being run like this.

Bwahaha. The funny thing is, you have it backwards. McCain wanted Joe Lieberman, but the republican party bigwigs, particularly those of the religious right pretty much foisted Palin on him. Not to say he wasn't receptive or whatever but this is clearly a pick by the insiders and by the dobsonites designed to shore up their base. McCain met her once.

McCain probably assumed that the religious right had vetted her themselves, or something, and they probably figured she seemed so cute and innocent there couldn't be any problems.
posted by delmoi at 7:48 PM on September 1, 2008


I'm guessing Cylon.
posted by troybob at 7:50 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


The amazing thing is that this is everything that's come out before the Democrats finish their opposition research, before the investigative journalists have taken a whack at her, and before she's had a moment to make a single unscripted statement or answer a single (post-announcement) question from a real reporter. All of this, from the granddaughter to the separatist group to the Stevens 527, was just what was on the surface.
posted by Bookhouse at 7:51 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


we'll get the white power affiliations around1:15PM tomorrow.

It's not "white power" but Palins connections to Pat Buchanan's 2000 run will kill the ticket with Jewish voters
posted by delmoi at 7:52 PM on September 1, 2008


EarBucket writes "You just can't choose a running mate without vetting her first."

McCain chose Lieberman (or maybe Pawlenty, or Romney).

Rove forced Palin on him. How, we'll never know. Maybe the same way they got him, in 2004, to hug the guy who dragged his daughter through the mud.

And Rove doesn't care if she's vetted, hell, it's better that she's not and gets eviscerated, because she's a sop to the Fundies and if she gets torn apart by "the lib'ruls" or the "lib'rul media", she'll make an even better martyr, thus cementing Fundie hate of Democrats and allegiance to the Republican Party.
posted by orthogonality at 7:58 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


There are so many angles to the story that I might not see it, but I'm curious as to whether the positive messages being put out by Focus on the Family and similar groups wrt Palin are consistent with their historical positions and statements. They could very well be; I'm just not familiar with them.
posted by troybob at 7:59 PM on September 1, 2008


My friends, all I can tell you is that there were five and a half years when I couldn't have vetted a running mate even if I had wanted to.
posted by Flunkie at 8:09 PM on September 1, 2008 [14 favorites]


Is the Republican Party or members of it purposely trying to derail McCain? The Palin nomination seems so problematic on a wide spectrum of areas. If he chose her as a Hail Sarah pass without vetting then "wow." If she was foisted upon him and his team assumed due diligence then someone just shanked him, bad. I am still trying to digest everything, and I admit that this is one very strange buffet that I am ladling on my plate.
posted by jadepearl at 8:09 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain sells the last scrap of his soul.
posted by Bookhouse at 8:15 PM on September 1, 2008 [3 favorites]


McCain wanted Joe Lieberman, but the republican party bigwigs, particularly those of the religious right pretty much foisted Palin on him.

According to this article by Sidney Blumenthal, McCain wanted Lieberman, but Rove insisted on picking Romney. Palin was McCain's "compromise choice" in response to Rove. The only thing Rove foisted on McCain was that his running mate had to be anti-abortion. It doesn't look like Rove force McCain to pick Palin specifically. Rove's skills as a strategist may be overrated, but he's not stupid.
posted by jonp72 at 8:17 PM on September 1, 2008


jadepearl writes "Is the Republican Party or members of it purposely trying to derail McCain?"

He's strongly disliked, even hated in some Republican circles.

It's not by accident that after he secured the nomination, anonymous Republican senators went to the media with "temper", "hot-headed", "unstable", and can't-be-trusted-with-the-button stories.

Whether it's his anti-pork stance, or his former "maverick" status, or his former liberalism on social issues, or real fear of his temperament, I don't know. But a senator doesn't shiv his Party's candidate for President without strong motivation.
posted by orthogonality at 8:20 PM on September 1, 2008


Hah, yeah, I've never had so much fun watching the Republicans trying to spin things. Tucker was on CNN tonight, and he said Palin had lots of military-related foreign policy experience and had made many important military decisions related to the Alaskan National Guard and Iraq deployments and whatnot. So the CNN lady said, 'Huh, okay then, can you name one of those decisions?' And Tucker went totally blank. He tried to cover it up and squirm out of the question, but when he couldn't even name *one* important foreign policy decision (after just saying she's made many!), well, he made the whole party look like a joke. Not that McCain needed his help in that area.
posted by jamstigator at 8:21 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


I'm curious as to whether the positive messages being put out by Focus on the Family and similar groups wrt Palin are consistent with their historical positions

Well I'm willing to bet my last nickel that if this were the situation uncovered on a Democratic candidate's screening, FotF would never let us hear the end of it. They'd wreak havoc with the entire rumor mill and make hay with the verifiable: past pot-smoking, the negligent-mom-flying-while-in-labor bit... Issues normally not escaping their scrutiny are easily glossed over when it's for a self-driven, politically protective purpose. It's all too convenient for certain hypocrites to cast (or mask) such tidbits in a light that suits them. With the religious right, "consistency" isn't what I'd call their strong suit.

and I happen to think of hypocrisy as an equal-opportunity worm that thrives in all dimensions of humankind when given the chance; I just think the Republicans are demonstrating it especially effectively right now.
posted by skyper at 8:26 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


She's a Paulite (2:47 in the video).
posted by joedan at 8:27 PM on September 1, 2008


Tucker was on CNN tonight

Here it is
posted by Bookhouse at 8:31 PM on September 1, 2008


Therefore: 1) they are not teaching abstinence-only to their own children, while 2) demanding that other people's children be taught the type of misinformation they don't pass on to their own kids.

Wow. That's family values, all right: "I value my family more than I value yours."


No, scody. They are advocating a very limited scope of sex ed at school. Abstinence from vaginal intercourse being (no one will deny) the only foolproof method of avoiding pregnancy or STDs. They find the idea repugnant, yes, of their twelve or thirteen-year-old doing the whole movie-gag condom-on-a-banana routine along with their classmates. It seems to them that instruction on condoms and IUDs and the pill has more to do with social issues than academic ones. They think parents, rather than teachers, should be the ones to handle such discussions with their children. Something along the lines of, "I know my child might have sex and get pregnant. But can I handle this possibility with my daughter--does it need to be a group project done with all the other horny teens in my kid's class?"

I don't agree with this thinking. But it's ridiculous to say that just because some people don't want their kids to have this kind of on-the-job training at school, they're hypocrites (delmoi) for privately giving their children further instruction. There are many, many aspects of child-rearing that we consider to be the parents' prerogative, and not the schools'; and there are a lot of gray areas. It shouldn't be too surprising that sex ed falls into "controversial" territory.

Certainly, there are parents who give their children no guidance beyond "don't do it." That's horribly irresponsible, but I don't think we have any basis for assuming Sarah Palin falls into that category. (Given her personal history, it actually seems unlikely that she does.)

I think McCain's gamble on Palin is going to blow up in his face, personal issues aside, and rightfully so. But saying Palin's responsible for her daughter's pregnancy on the basis of Palin's position on school sex ed policy is unfair and irrelevant. At least in the world according to torticat, metafilter's newest termagant. :)
posted by torticat at 8:32 PM on September 1, 2008


Oh, hey! Looks like she may be lying about having been named Miss Congeniality. There's still 23 minutes left before September 2; I wonder what else we'll find out today!
posted by EarBucket at 8:38 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Abstinence from vaginal intercourse being (no one will deny) the only foolproof method of avoiding pregnancy or STDs.
I deny that abstinence from vaginal intercourse is a foolproof method of avoiding STDs.

Did you, perhaps, get your sex ed via an abstinence-only curriculum?
posted by Flunkie at 8:38 PM on September 1, 2008 [8 favorites]


Getting to know you.
posted by Astro Zombie at 8:42 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin said that she was baptized Catholic as a newborn and now attends a "non-denominational Bible church".
posted by lukemeister at 8:45 PM on September 1, 2008


They are advocating a very limited scope of sex ed at school.

I get that, but it is still problematic because it puts at a disadvantage kids who don't have responsible parental influence. It's one thing for parents to say that they don't want their own kids taught sex education (an option that existed when I was growing up in GA in the 80s), but to extend that decision to all kids is unfair, so I tend to think scody's criticism holds here.

Also, I don't get how she would be advocating abstinence-only for school and then she is supplementing that with something else at home. Abstinence-only has one option--no sex--and does not allow room for others--doesn't even allow it in a public-health sense. Teaching her daughter about birth control (which, on a brief search, it seems Palin has indicated at some pint to be against altogether) would not seem consistent with an abstinence-only policy.

Or is there something about abstinence-only I'm not getting? Does the 'only' part refer to that being the only thing taught in school, or does it refer to abstinence being the only thing taught, period.
posted by troybob at 8:46 PM on September 1, 2008


Did you, perhaps, get your sex ed via an abstinence-only curriculum?

no, he got it from his grandmother and his grammar's confused
posted by pyramid termite at 8:48 PM on September 1, 2008


Oh, hey! Looks like she may be lying about having been named Miss Congeniality.
Lying about even trivial things which there's no reason to lie about? I'm surprised she doesn't already have a position in the Bush administration.
posted by Flunkie at 8:49 PM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


> I deny that abstinence from vaginal intercourse is a foolproof method of avoiding STDs.

But if you get an STD and you are a virgin, it's just a TD right?

I mean, it is not like you can get a disease from kissing, skin contact, backdoor action, or even cuddling in the same bed, right?
posted by mrzarquon at 8:49 PM on September 1, 2008


No, scody. They are advocating a very limited scope of sex ed at school. Abstinence from vaginal intercourse being (no one will deny) the only foolproof method of avoiding pregnancy or STDs. They find the idea repugnant, yes, of their twelve or thirteen-year-old doing the whole movie-gag condom-on-a-banana routine along with their classmates.

No, what they find repugnant isn't their children being taught this, it's any children being taught those things, after all, they can opt their kids out if they want too. And how many kids, having been deprived of sex-ed at school are actually going to get it at home. You hear stories all the time about the confusion teens have about sex. It seems like something everyone "just knows" but the fact is a lot of kids don't understand much about it at all, certainly not about birth control.

Opting a kid out of sex ed is fine, but what these people are talking about is banning all sex ed for everyone.

Now I do see what you mean about how you can be opposed to school sex ed but still in favor of parents giving kids the birds 'n' the bees, but there are clearly a lot of people who think that all sex before marriage is wrong and are not going to explain how and why to use condoms with their kids. (but no, we don't actually know if Palin is one of them)
posted by delmoi at 9:08 PM on September 1, 2008


Did you, perhaps, get your sex ed via an abstinence-only curriculum?

Honestly, I don't even remember what they told me. I'm old. :)

However, point taken. STDs can be got otherhow than vaginal intercourse. Pregnancy, setting aside IVF etc, not so much.
posted by torticat at 9:13 PM on September 1, 2008


Pregnancy, setting aside IVF etc, not so much.

actually someone I know got preg while still technically a virgin. Motile little bastards, aren't they?
posted by troy at 9:17 PM on September 1, 2008


Blockbuster NY Times piece on the Sarah Palin Vetting Disaster
“The comedy of errors that is John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin continues. Except, when the issue is picking a potential leader of our nation in a time of war, it shouldn't be a comedy and it shouldn't be filled with errors.

Read this blockbuster article in tomorrow's New York Times. There is so much in it. The article reveals that John McCain didn't get the vice president he wanted (Joe Lieberman or Tom Ridge) because the religious right, which controls the GOP (and now controls John McCain), went ballistic on McCain last week because both Lieberman and Ridge are pro-choice. So McCain caved. Because of McCain's kowtowing to the theocrats, he hurriedly dumped Lieberman and Ridge and instead picked the very anti-abortion, but not much else, Palin without even fully vetting her.

Now, sure, the McCain campaign is claiming that Palin was ‘thoroughly vetted.’ But, that is clearly not true - the Times talked to all the key players in Alaska, and none of them were approached by the McCain campaign. In fact, McCain's vetter only just arrived in Alaska on Thursday, the day before McCain announced Palin as his VP choice.

This failure is actually quite stunning on many levels. It's just so fundamental to the process, the vetting of a vice presidential choice, that failing to do it properly is pretty much campaign malpractice. Clearly, Sarah Palin was not seriously vetted. An excerpt from the Times:
‘In Alaska, several state leaders and local officials said they knew of no efforts by the McCain campaign to find out more information about Ms. Palin before the announcement of her selection, Although campaigns are typically discreet when they make inquiries into potential running mates, officials in Alaska said Monday they thought it was peculiar that no one in the state had the slightest hint that Ms. Palin might be under consideration.

‘They didn’t speak to anyone in the Legislature, they didn’t speak to anyone in the business community,’ said Lyda Green, the State Senate president, who lives in Wasilla, where Ms. Palin served as mayor.

Representative Gail Phillips, a Republican and former speaker of the State House, said the widespread surprise in Alaska when Ms. Palin was named to the ticket made her wonder how intensively the McCain campaign had vetted her.

‘I started calling around and asking, and I have not been able to find one person that was called,’ Ms. Phillips said. ‘I called 30 to 40 people, political leaders, business leaders, community leaders. Not one of them had heard. Alaska is a very small community, we know people all over, but I haven’t found anybody who was asked anything.’

The current mayor of Wasilla, Dianne M. Keller, said she had not heard of any efforts to look into Ms. Palin’s background. And Randy Ruedrich, the state Republican Party chairman, said he knew nothing of any vetting that had been conducted.

State Senator Hollis French, a Democrat who is directing the ethics investigation, said that no one asked him about the allegations. ‘I heard not a word, not a single contact,’ he said.

Mr. French, a former prosecutor, said that he was knowledgeable about background checks and that, he, too, was surprised that the campaign had not reached out to state legislative leaders.’
We've been saying for the past couple of days that this pick says more about John McCain than Sarah Palin. It really does. John McCain caved to the anti-abortion theocrats running the Republican Party, made a hasty pick for his v.p., and is now suffering the consequences.”
posted by ericb at 9:17 PM on September 1, 2008 [10 favorites]


Levi Johnston: Bristol Palin's Baby Daddy Revealed.
posted by ericb at 9:22 PM on September 1, 2008


My form of abstinence-only curriculum is staying on Metafilter all the time.
posted by lukemeister at 9:22 PM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


I guess what I'm talking about is that if 'all' this is the best 'they' have against Sarah Palin, well they ain't got much. I'm seeing nada about policy and real political problems (and being a conservative is a strength, not a problem for the GOP veep nominee) except the nebulous 'lack of foreign policy experience'.


This is because beyond being for drilling and against polar bears, Palin doesn't have any specific policy positions beyond the run of the mill cultural and pro business conservatism.

A lot of people here seem offended that the "liberal blogosphere" is going after Palin's personal life, and I agree that on a personal level it is offensive. However, Palin's personal life has nothing to do with me, but her political life is very important. These rumors about her pregnancy were already out in the open in Alaska before she took the VP nomination. She should have known that the rumors and her daughters pregnancy would become national news. Just like Edwards was an asshole for campaigning while he was having an affair, Palin was very irresponsible toward her kids. Both Trig and Bristol are going to dealing with fucked up blow back from this for the rest of their lives.

Politically, I don't see how this is anything but good news for Obama. Palin is in self destruct mode, nobody on his side even needs to talk about her anymore, she will forever carry "plagued by scandals" next to her name.

Also, I really want to move to this place in America where people don't like to pass moral judgment over other people's personal lives, because that sure is not where I live.
posted by afu at 9:24 PM on September 1, 2008


New York Post:
“Palin and her husband, Todd, said their daughter plans to marry the child's father - who sources said is Levi Johnston - and that both ‘are going to realize very quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will have the love and support of our entire family.’

Johnston, 17, who is entering his senior year at Wasilla HS, plays on the school hockey team and was once teammates on a youth squad with Palin's older brother, Track, 19, who is now in the Army.

Despite suffering a cracked bone in his shin last season, Johnston scored 24 goals in 24 games.

‘We don't want to talk about this,’ said a woman who answered the phone at the Johnston home.

On his MySpace page, Johnston boasts, ‘I'm a f - - -in' redneck’ who likes to snowboard and ride dirt bikes.

‘But I live to play hockey. I like to go camping and hang out with the boys, do some fishing, shoot some s- - - and just f - - -in' chillin' I guess.’

‘Ya f - - - with me I'll kick [your] ass,’ he added.

He also claims to be ‘in a relationship,’ but states, ‘I don't want kids.’’’
posted by ericb at 9:26 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


From ericb's Levi Johnston: Bristol Palin's Baby Daddy Revealed link:
On his MySpace page, Johnston (...) claims to be "in a relationship," but states, "I don't want kids."
That's still (or at least very recently) on his MySpace page?

I wonder if he found out before or after John McCain.
posted by Flunkie at 9:32 PM on September 1, 2008


he is cute! will be cute when he reaches legal age...
posted by troybob at 9:32 PM on September 1, 2008


Honestly, I don't even know how John Stewart will *begin* tomorrow night.
posted by mrzarquon at 9:36 PM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


I can almost guarantee he's going to begin by offering the Palin's congratulations and best wishes on the pregnancy announcement and then move on to grilling her on everything else.
posted by empath at 9:45 PM on September 1, 2008


‘I'm a f - - -in' redneck’ who likes to snowboard and ride dirt bikes.

‘We don't want to talk about this,’ said a woman who answered the phone at the Johnston home.

LET LEVI SPEAK!
posted by Brian B. at 9:51 PM on September 1, 2008


He also claims to be ‘in a relationship,’ but states, ‘I don't want kids.’’’

I've wondered what it would like to get knocked up by Jim Anchower.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 9:54 PM on September 1, 2008 [6 favorites]


This story would have achieved perfection had the father turned out to be Hugh Downs.
posted by troybob at 9:56 PM on September 1, 2008


Dude, this is as good as the prewar intelligence on Iraq!
posted by every_one_needs_a_hug_sometimes at 9:59 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Thanks to Orthogonality and others. I am going to go ahead and think that McCain was done a purposeful disservice by both Rove and anti-abortion elements; caught in a compromise with predictable behavior he chooses a candidate that was not fully vetted. Damn, I assume he plays craps better than this blooming situation indicates. Man, there are a lot of long knives out for Palin in Alaska and wow, McCain in his own party.
posted by jadepearl at 10:01 PM on September 1, 2008


The New York Times article is mindblowing.

Jesus, this speaks very poorly of McCain's judgment. NYT says he announced her nomination moments after his first face-to-face meeting with her!

And that he chose her only after the religious right told him he had to. Some maverick!

When you add these revelations to the things we already know about her trooper scandal, her ties to the secessionist group, her manifest inexperience, and the lack of vetting, McCain has got to dump her. Surely she will withdraw her name within the next forty-eight hours.
posted by jayder at 10:06 PM on September 1, 2008


This is completely mindblowing. I can't help but be a bit giddy over that CNN clip; I've never seen them tear someone a new hole like that - especially a Republican.

Goddamn it. I think this is god's punishment to Hunter S. Thompson for offing himself - throwing the most perfect circus of a political storm at the next available election.
posted by kaibutsu at 10:13 PM on September 1, 2008 [5 favorites]


I don't understand why those Alaska Republican legislators who were interviewed by the New York Times were so open about the fact that Palin was not vetted. Are they trying to destroy her nomination? It would seem that, as Republicans and (presumably) Palin supporters, they would want to give the illusion that she was carefully vetted; instead, they are bending over backwards to confirm everyone's suspicion that she was not vetted, and they are being strangely forthcoming about that information.
posted by jayder at 10:14 PM on September 1, 2008


he is cute! will be cute when he reaches legal age...

Hey, age of consent is 16 in Alaska (apparently)

I don't think being tied to a secessionist group is really that big of a deal, unless they were violent secessionists, who really cares?
posted by delmoi at 10:15 PM on September 1, 2008


Jayder - Speaking as a mathematician, I can safely say that in the long run, everyone loses at craps.

Everyone.
posted by kaibutsu at 10:17 PM on September 1, 2008


I've always had the impression that McCain doesn't like the religious nutcases in the party. Reading the NYT thing, I'm wondering if he's basically sticking it to them--or trying to scare the hell out of them--by turning it into a train wreck--especially if he faces being threatened by them at every turn down the line. Some variation of this would explain (as an alternative to plain old senility) his shocking lack of judgment in this whole thing.
posted by troybob at 10:18 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


It would seem that, as Republicans and (presumably) Palin supporters, they would want to give the illusion that she was carefully vetted; instead, they are bending over backwards to confirm everyone's suspicion that she was not vetted, and they are being strangely forthcoming about that information.

From what I understand, Palin is that well liked among Republican circles in Alaska because she ran against a Republican incumbent governor and has been "anti corruption".
posted by afu at 10:19 PM on September 1, 2008


“They didn’t seriously consider her until four or five days from the time she was picked, before she was asked, maybe the Thursday or Friday before,” said a Republican close to the campaign. “This was really kind of rushed at the end, because John didn’t get what he wanted. He wanted to do Joe or Ridge.”

Now that's an unappetizing image.
posted by The Straightener at 10:19 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


instead, they are bending over backwards to confirm everyone's suspicion that she was not vetted, and they are being strangely forthcoming about that information.

In stories on her so far, it appears that she hasn't really built any bridges in Alaska, even within her own party.
posted by troybob at 10:21 PM on September 1, 2008


If McCain can't call the shots in his own campaign, how's he going to call the shots for the country?
posted by kirkaracha at 10:22 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


C'mon, delmoi - this is Alaska. These were secessionists with guns!

And remember all that 'Putting country First' stuff? Michelle Obama being all not proud enough of her country? Where exactly does a secessionist fall on the patriotism scale?
posted by kaibutsu at 10:23 PM on September 1, 2008


I don't understand why those Alaska Republican legislators who were interviewed by the New York Times were so open about the fact that Palin was not vetted. Are they trying to destroy her nomination?

I wouldn't put it past them. She's done a lot to tweak the Alaska GOP -- play their game to get to the top, then tosses them aside to put her loyalists in power (as with her pushing the lieutenant governor into that runoff with Don Young). She's really only been a player in the party on a state level for a few years, and I'm guessing the good ol' boys with the old money wouldn't like anything more than for her to be politically damaged so greatly they can get rid of her and send her packing back to Wasilla.

Yeah, she's underqualified to be president, but she's shown herself to be a back-stabbin', horse-tradin' politician. She just wants to run her own political machine.
posted by dw at 10:24 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Oh pooh, jayder. McCain is living up to his word. He's putting country first. And with any rise in the polls, see- the person some people hated on, who said she had no experience - "Look! Americans want her!" they'll say.

You already saw Bounds trying to twist any criticism of her into "belittling". So what McCain had to choose somebody - presidents have to make tough choices and listen to the people, not the media or the pundits. That's why John's a maverick. You know, he learned to ignore what people were telling him he had to do, when he spent 5 & 1/2 years as a P.O.W.

Small towns and rural areas are what makes this country great. And that's where Sarah Palin is from. She's got problems just like you, and the liberal elite latte intellectual internet nerds are attacking her for it. But Sarah is tough, and she will go to bat for you in the white house. And she's just so American and pretty, so who cares about lies or any of that nonsense you hear. Just look at her. Look at John. Now vote for them, and not the communist muslim liberal interweb nerd baby killer meanies who gang up on her. Math is hard!
posted by cashman at 10:26 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


jayder writes "I don't understand why those Alaska Republican legislators who were interviewed by the New York Times were so open about the fact that Palin was not vetted."

Because they hate her. I'm a little vague on all this who-killed-Cock-Robbin business, but other than her ties to Senator Ted "series of tubes" Stevens (sitting on the board of his dubiously legal 527 soft-money org), she's apparently the outsider reform candidate who upset a lot of apple-carts, getting elected just as the rest of the Alaska Republican Party was imploding over corruption allegations. That's, and her Fundie bona fides, is how a mayor who'd been out of work for three years became Governor.
posted by orthogonality at 10:30 PM on September 1, 2008


I apologize up front, but the tawdry rumors, etc. continue online.
"Sarah Palin Nude Pictures, Bristol Daughter’s Second Child and more trouble."

posted by ericb at 10:31 PM on September 1, 2008


It appears that her Alaskan colleagues are being pretty open about their utter astonishment at her nomination. The Alaska Republican legislators' quotes to the effect of, "We can't find anyone who was called to vet her," sound very much like they are politely saying, "How the hell did this moron get picked as a VP nominee?"

Seriously, if her own state party colleagues can't bring themselves to put on a gameface when the media comes calling, but are openly incredulous, what does that say about her fitness? Who knows her better than her fellow Alaska politicians?

She's toast.
posted by jayder at 10:33 PM on September 1, 2008


WikiScandal
posted by Artw at 10:35 PM on September 1, 2008


What kind of beauty pageant requires nude pictures? Couldn't she be wearing a bikini under those white bars?
posted by delmoi at 10:35 PM on September 1, 2008


Nude pictures? Jesus. Okay, she's really gone, now.
posted by jayder at 10:37 PM on September 1, 2008


ericb: The second rumor on the page you linked to has also been debunked. The girl pictured holding the baby is Sadie Johnston, Bristol's boyfriend's Sister, and she's holding Trig.
posted by delmoi at 10:37 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Ericb, did you see the source link on the blog post you just linked to for the naked pictures?

here's an excerpt:
So, with THAT NOTE, we OFFICIAL LAUNCH THE SARAH PALIN NAKED PHOTOSHOP CONTENT! Create, inspire, share! Send us your hottest pics of Sarah Palin — email to hollywoodnewsroom@gmail.com. So what’s the top prize? Um, we actually do have an unopened review copy of Tina Fey’s Baby Mama — ON BLU-RAY!
Somehow I don't think that picture is legitimate.
posted by delmoi at 10:40 PM on September 1, 2008


Possibly not the best choice of words...
posted by Artw at 10:43 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


Wow, James Dobson just came out and said that Palin's nude photos are perfectly fine, because god made us all nude to start off with.
posted by troybob at 10:47 PM on September 1, 2008


I don't understand why those Alaska Republican legislators who were interviewed by the New York Times were so open about the fact that Palin was not vetted. Are they trying to destroy her nomination? It would seem that, as Republicans and (presumably) Palin supporters, they would want to give the illusion that she was carefully vetted; instead, they are bending over backwards to confirm everyone's suspicion that she was not vetted, and they are being strangely forthcoming about that information. (jayder above at 1:14)

Let's note that people are now surprised that Republicans might actually tell the truth on occasion.
posted by AsYouKnow Bob at 10:50 PM on September 1, 2008 [4 favorites]


WikiScandal

What scandal? Are you cuckoo? There's no conflict of interest when a McCain campaign representative edits a VP nominee's page. None whatsoever.
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 10:50 PM on September 1, 2008


Speaking of wikipedia:
he Times is a daily national newspaper published in the United Kingdom since 1785 when it was known as The Daily Universal Register.

The Times is the original "Times" newspaper, lending its name to many other papers around the world, such as The New York Times, The Times of India, and The Irish Times. For specificity it is sometimes referred to outside of (though never within) the UK as the London Times. The paper is the originator of the ubiquitous Times New Roman typeface, originally developed by Stanley Morison of The Times in collaboration with the Monotype Corporation for its legibility in low-tech printing.

The newspaper was printed in broadsheet format for 200 years, but switched to compact size in 2004 in an attempt to appeal to younger readers.
Today, The Times just wrote an article about wikidrama potentially involving a U.S. major party vice presidential candidate.

Just think about that for a moment.
posted by delmoi at 11:01 PM on September 1, 2008


It's also owned by the dude who owns MySpace!
posted by Artw at 11:07 PM on September 1, 2008


I can't fine Levi Johnston's Myspace page...I want an add!
posted by troybob at 11:11 PM on September 1, 2008


It's all a big circle! We're living in the future!
posted by Artw at 11:13 PM on September 1, 2008 [1 favorite]


Being pro polar bear, I think I'll have to vote Democrat in November.

Well, that and I am damned near inspired by the way Barack Obama has made his candidacy not about these trivial issues, but about providing the greatest benefit for the greatest number of Americans.

VPILF, Troopergate, "What is it exactly that the Vice President Does", polar bear hating, Ms. Alaska scholarship competitions, lack of vetting, teen pregnancy, and trivial experience aside, I don't need a reason not to vote for a ticket with Sarah Palin on it other than the fact that she is running under a candidate and platform that is out of touch and damned near adversarial to what I want my country to represent.

Thank you XQUZYPHYR, DaShiv, empath, and Joey Michaels for your thoughts.
posted by clearly at 11:25 PM on September 1, 2008 [2 favorites]


See, now THIS is the stuff.
posted by empath at 12:02 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


troybob: "I can't fine Levi Johnston's Myspace page...I want an add!"

You should go for it. Politics is all about networking, after all. And if McCain's vetting team is as crappy as it seems... who knows? You might just land yourself a cabinet position.
posted by Rhaomi at 12:44 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


My goal has always been to sleep my way to the bottom!
posted by troybob at 12:50 AM on September 2, 2008


Interesting: Mayor Palin: A Rough Record. A lot of lopping off of heads, apparently, though much of that was probably par for the course in post-election politics - the newly appointed gets rid of those who supported the opposition and puts their own people into staff positions.

However, even those who supported her weren't exempt:

Governing was no less contentious than campaigning, at least to begin with. She ended up dismissing almost all the city department heads who had been loyal to Stein, including a few who had been instrumental in getting her into politics to begin with. Some saw it as a betrayal. Stambaugh, the police chief and member of Palin's step aerobics class, filed a lawsuit for wrongful termination, alleging that Palin terminated him in part at the behest of the National Rifle Association, because he had opposed a concealed-gun law the NRA supported. He eventually lost the suit. The animosity spawned some talk of a recall attempt, but eventually Palin's opponents on the City Council opted for a more conciliatory route.


or even the librarian:

Stein says that as mayor, Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them. "The librarian was aghast." The librarian, Mary Ellen Baker, couldn't be reached for comment, but news reports from the time show that Palin had threatened to fire her for not giving "full support" to the mayor.

ugh. Firing (or threatening to fire) people who don't immediately snap-to and comply without question to whatever she demands seems to be another special skill Palin hopes to bring to the White House.
posted by taz at 1:02 AM on September 2, 2008 [11 favorites]


Ya know, if McCain really does go down in flames on this Palin thing, we will have the anti-abortionists to thank. Very weird for me to have to give them credit for anything, anytime, anyhow, but there it is.
posted by telstar at 1:04 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Enough of the preliminaries: when do we get to unleash Hilary on her?
posted by troybob at 1:08 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Yeah, she won't know what hit her after the Clintons take their shots. Do you think Hillary is going to let a 'little miss tammy wynette' take her spotlight?
posted by empath at 1:20 AM on September 2, 2008


She is a TERRIBLE choice. It's a "We're getting creamed here! Let's find us a beauty queen!" move (by Rove?).

It's exactly like that scene in "O Brother, Where Art Thou?" wherein Governor O'Daniel, who is getting roundly beaten by Homer Stokes, is having a bull session on his front porch:

PAPPY
I signed that bill! I signed a dozen
a those aggi-culture bills! Everyone
knows I'm a friend a the fahmuh!
What do I gotta do, start diddlin'
livestock?!

JUNIOR
We cain't do that, Daddy, we might
offend our constichency.

PAPPY
We ain't got a constichency! Stokes
got a constichency!

ECKARD
Them straw polls is ugly.

SPIVEY
Stokes is pullin' ah pants down.

ECKARD
Gonna pluck us off the tit.

SPIVEY
Pappy gonna be sittin' there pants
down and Stokes at the table soppin'
up the gravy.

ECKARD
Latch right on to that tit.

SPIVEY
Wipin' little circles with his bread.

ECKARD
Suckin' away.

SPIVEY
Well, it's a well-run campaign,
midget'n broom'n whatnot.

ECKARD
Devil his due.

SPIVEY
Helluva awgazation.

JUNIOR
Say, I gotten idee.

ECKARD
What sat, Junior?

JUNIOR
We could hire us a little fella even
smaller'n Stokes's.

Pappy whips at him with his hat.

PAPPY
Y'ignorant slope-shouldered sack a
guts! Why we'd look like a buncha
satchel-ass Johnnie-Come-Latelies
braggin' on our own midget! Don't
matter how stumpy! And that's the
goddamn problem right there - people
think this Stokes got fresh ideas,
he's oh coorant and we the past.

ECKARD
Problem a p'seption.

SPIVEY
Ass right.

ECKARD
Reason why he's pullin' ah pants
down.

SPIVEY
Gonna paddle ah little bee-hind.

ECKARD
Ain't gonna paddle it; he's gonna
kick it real hard.

With his mouth forming an O around his dropping cigar, Pappy
looks sadly from one to the other, like a spectator at a
particularly boring tennis match.

SPIVEY
No, I believe he's a-gonna paddle
it.

ECKARD
Well now, I don't believe assa
property scription.

SPIVEY
Well, that's how I characterize it.

ECKARD
Well, I believe it's mawva kickin'
sichation.

SPIVEY
Pullin' ah pants down...

ECKARD
Wipin' little circles with his
bread...
posted by chuckdarwin at 3:13 AM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


So the regular media have jumped upon the rumor that Trig is not Sarah's child and they are covering the pregnancy of the daughter. Did anybody see any regular media question the apparent fact that Palin flew home from Texas to Alaska while her water had broken and then drove even further to a remote small hospital to have her child? This just seems so unbelievable to me and I assumed it would have been disputed by now because I thought it surely must be a misunderstanding.
posted by davar at 3:35 AM on September 2, 2008


It's exactly like that scene in "O Brother, Where Art Thou?"

Usysses: Now, boys, this here thread that's run longer than The Odyssey done went and indirectly referenced it. That's what you call a "inside joke."

Delmar: Are we on the inside part? Cause I don't get it.
posted by kid ichorous at 3:40 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Did anybody see any regular media question the apparent fact that Palin flew home from Texas to Alaska while her water had broken and then drove even further to a remote small hospital to have her child?

That, and the daughter's coincidental weird absence from school for five months (for MONO?) are the biggest danglers for me too, since they smell funny. Those'd be the avenues worth checking out if I was one of them 'investigative journalist' types.

But hey, it's only been three days: If my calculations are correct, at the current rate she'll be implicated in some kind of white slavery / neo-nazi / puppy-sex ring by next Tuesday!
posted by rokusan at 4:12 AM on September 2, 2008


Konolia: It is my understanding that Palin's husband is taking care of the kids...
Palin's husband works at an oil company. Of course he is taking care of the kids, like all parents, but not in a stay-at-home-dad kind of role.

also, please remember that all but one of her children are school age.
But the one child that is not school age has Down Syndrome, and one of the school age children is pregnant.

(Just to be sure: I do not imply that there is a problem with this. I am just surprised that Konolia says that the people in her church love Palin, because based on my experience I would have thought otherwise and I am curious if Palin's running for VP now will have a positive impact on fundamentalist's views of women)
posted by davar at 4:38 AM on September 2, 2008


You might just land yourself a cabinet position.

Hmm, if living near to Russia gives you foreign policy experience. . .

Hey, my dad's a doctor, I could be Director of Health and Human Services!

I grew up near a bunch of corn farms, I could be Secretary of Agriculture!

I used to date someone who worked for a bank: Federal Reserve Board, here I come!

Konolia lives closer to Fort Bragg than I do, so she should probably take Secretary of Defense.
posted by EarBucket at 4:59 AM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


Earbucket, you just put me off my lunch.
posted by chuckdarwin at 5:17 AM on September 2, 2008


also, please remember that all but one of her children are school age.


They're home-schooled.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 5:33 AM on September 2, 2008


All last night, I was tossing and turning and losing sleep, thinking "I can't believe John McCain has nominated a secessionist to be Vice President of the United States".

Upon getting out of bed just a few minutes ago, I decided I would go back to this thread to post "I can't believe John McCain nominated a secessionist to be Vice President of the United States".

Before doing so, I decided to check the comments that were posted since I had gone to bed.

Now, I'm still incredulous about the fact that John McCain nominated a secessionist to be Vice President of the United States, but:

She fired the town librarian for not banning books?

This whole thing is a farce.
posted by Flunkie at 5:40 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


And by the way, I can't believe John McCain has nominated a secessionist to be Vice President of the United States.
posted by Flunkie at 5:41 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I watched early local news see how the Illinois Republican party would spin the weekend's revelations.

Two points are repeated:

1. How dare anyone violate the privacy of a candidate's child? This is a private family issue, and should not be fodder for media attention. How brave of the Palin family to not abort but keep the baby.

2. Sarah Palin ruffled a lot of feathers with her brave stances against corruption in Alaska politics. By being against the "Bridge to Nowhere" and standing up for her values she may have made enemies. Isn't that someone you would want to lead our country? Better that than Barack Obama who did not make enemies or fight corruption serving in one of the most corrupt state governments and working with the Daley machine.

This is the local line in Chicago - I wouldn't doubt she's been asked to step aside to spend more time with her family. If she does step aside she will be seen as a martyr, hounded out by the left.

The Dems should just stick to the overwhelming gaffe this is to overlook vetting a national candidate, and march into something ill-prepared and not fully cognisant of all possible outcomes... like starting the war in Iraq.
posted by readery at 5:50 AM on September 2, 2008


Konolia: Please remember that all but one of her children are school age.
XQUZYPHYR: They're home-schooled.


Of course they are.

Her hairdo gave it away.
posted by rokusan at 5:51 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]



And by the way, I can't believe John McCain has nominated a secessionist to be Vice President of the United States.


Not only that but one of the tactics of the party: infiltrating other parties to advance from the agenda.

How does that work? You join another party and cheer and clap when everyone else cheers and claps, and then at an appropriate time in the conversation yell out "and we should let Alaska secede!" and hope everyone agrees?
posted by drezdn at 5:53 AM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


They're home-schooled.

I do not believe that is correct. I beleive the children are in day schools and Bristol is being home schooled - either because she had mono followed by being pregnancy, or simply because she is pregnant. I don't think we have a timeline for when exactly she left her public school.

* * *

Palin continued to inject religious beliefs into her policy at times. "She asked the library how she could go about banning books," he says, because some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them.


I have been feeling generally charitable towards Palin in this thread and wary of the fact that she's getting a rough ride for what may not be the best issues upon which to skewer her. I disagree with her on virtually everything, but I am very prepared to be tolerant of people with with views that differ from my own and who make choices or hold beliefs that are different than mine.

However, when you start banning library books, or leaning on librarians to pull titles that don't meet with your specific family's values, that is a bridge too far for me. Seriously. I'm livid now.
posted by DarlingBri at 5:56 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


At the very most -- the very most -- the social conservative vote amounts to 40 percent of the electorate, concentrated in the south and rural areas of the rest of the country. McCain already had that vote locked up, if not with much enthusiasm. Enthusiasm might be good for +5 points gain with 40 percent of the electorate. People like konolia, while they represent themselves as "ordinary Americans" and members of some kind of silent "majority" are in fact in a *minority* of Americans who hold absolutist views on abortion, gay rights, and other social issues, who decry science education, sex education, and social tolerance more generally. The claim that a Southern, evangelical, science-hating, proudly ignorant white person is the "average" American is a cherished fiction of the right, and a way of making this minority of poorly educated and historically fading people feel better about their own prejudices and parochialisms. After all, "every" family has teenage pregnancies in it (not mine, not anyone I work with, but every "real American" family, where teenage girls exist to make babies and nothing else).

Ergo, Palin is a desperation move to shore up a base that was not solid. But the choice alienates many who were on the fence -- the crucial independents who care about things like good schools and science based social policy.

The appeal to "women" has clearly backfired, if it was ever on the table.

Obama has this one in the bag. There's no way to spin the Sarah Palin story so it produces *new* votes for McCain. Obama just has to stay focused, serious, and keep his eye on the prize.

I feel way more confident that the konolia's of the world will be crying in their pews on the Sunday after election day than I did before the Palin pick. Well done, McCain!
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:10 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


The more I think about this, the more I come to this conclusion:

I'm a huge Obama supporter. Have been for several years now. I've donated money to his campaign, I volunteer about ten hours a week as a canvass captain, and I think he's the most exciting political candidate of my lifetime. That said, if he'd pulled something like this, I'd have to very seriously re-evaluate my support of him. I think it might be enough to convince me that he didn't have the judgement required to be the most powerful person in the world.
posted by EarBucket at 6:17 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


konolias, not konolia's
posted by fourcheesemac at 6:26 AM on September 2, 2008


This post over at Jezebel explains perfectly why the wild speculation over the pregnancy/ies of any female member of the Palin family is just fucking inexcusable.
posted by shiu mai baby at 6:30 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


And the Washington Post's op-ed page is comparing Palin to Caligula's horse. We're officially in PR disaster mode here. She's got to give a Checkers speech or get the hell off the ticket before they officially nominate her tomorrow night.
posted by EarBucket at 6:30 AM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


The gift that keeps on giving:
The Washington Post reported Sunday, citing an interview with campaign manager Rick Davis, that the vetting process "included reviews of financial and other personal data, an FBI background check and considerable discussion among the handful of McCain advisers nvolved in the deliberations.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation did not participate in the vetting of Gov. Sarah Palin and did not conduct a background check as part of the process, an FBI spokesman said today.
Forget who you want answering that 3am phone call. McCain's doesn't even have a phone, apparently.
posted by orthogonality at 6:33 AM on September 2, 2008


Way late to the party, but...

Regardling Bush #1's choice of Quayle: I remember reading something interesting some years back. It was in a book about George Sr.'s presidential campaign and administration.

In each chapter, the authors focused on a different decision or issue faced by the man and attempted to explain his choices in very real-world, no BS terms. They weren't justifying them or arguing that they were smart moves, just providing plausible explanations for how they came about. They provided a lot of details I hadn't known before and cited a lot of sources. Plus, they had a lot of insidey, Bob Woodward type accounts of conversations among the decision makers.

There were a number of Bush episodes that seemed stupid or just perplexing at the time they happened (the "read my lips" pledge or the part of his campaign where he tried to channel Harry Truman, for examples), but after reading the chapters devoted to them I'd say to myself "Oh! well now it makes sense."

You should understand, when I read a book like this, I frequently do not read it from front to back. I usually start in the middle and skip around a lot. (Don't ask me why; it's just one of my pathologies.) So the Quayle issue was one of the last things I read about, even though it came pretty early in the narrative. When I saw the chapter heading, I said to myself (yes, I talk to myself a lot when I read.) "Finally! They're going to solve the biggest Bush mystery of all time; why the hell did he choose this guy?"

They began by describing how Bush woke up one day during the campaign, peculiarly excited and enthusiastic, and announced that he'd chosen Quayle. No one could talk him out of it. The authors point out the obvious: that the decision was irrational and at odds with accepted practice. There was just no sensible reason to choose him. So, their explanation?

They think maybe George took too much of his thyroid medication that day.

That's it. That's all they could come up with. Apart from that, they said, they were completely stumped.

I've been thinking about all this quite a lot since McCain chose Palin.
posted by Clay201 at 6:35 AM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


McCain already had that vote locked up

Uh, no, he didn't.

Ever hear of Ron Paul?
posted by konolia at 6:36 AM on September 2, 2008


"And when liberals and progressives pounce on rumors like this one about Trig's "true" parentage — whether or not it is true, which I'm pretty sure it's not — or rumors about Republican politicians' sexuality (in the absence of crimes committed) we are conceding that conservatives are right, and personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy. We are accepting their terms, their definitions of appropriate private behavior, and attempting to use those definitions to defeat their candidates. And once we do that, even if we do "take down" Sarah Palin or whatever Republican candidate in order to protect gay rights or reproductive rights or educational rights, then we've lost on those issues anyway because we've conceded that the underpinnings to the Republican positions on those issues is valid."

QFT. From the Jezebel link above.
posted by shiu mai baby at 6:40 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


2. Sarah Palin ruffled a lot of feathers with her brave stances against corruption in Alaska politics. By being against the "Bridge to Nowhere" and standing up for her values she may have made enemies. Isn't that someone you would want to lead our country? Better that than Barack Obama who did not make enemies or fight corruption serving in one of the most corrupt state governments and working with the Daley machine.

I think that this is a really powerful avenue of attack for the GOP, actually. Obama found ways to work with and work within Chicago's corruption and patronage, rather than taking some big stand against it. It doesn't mean that he is dirty, just that he went along to get along with some pretty dirty people.

For all of Palin's weirdness (and there seems to be more weirdness every hour), she made her name challenging a visibly corrupt party structure, and did so with a certain degree of effectiveness. She's not as pure as is being claimed (eg for the bridge before she was against the bridge), but overall she really did address corruption as an issue. That right there lets her and McCain make a clear separation between themselves and the "lets give contracts to my friends" Bush administration, and make insinuations about Obama's overlap with Illinois corruption.
posted by Forktine at 6:44 AM on September 2, 2008


Sarah Palin ruffled a lot of feathers with her brave stances against corruption in Alaska politics. By being against the "Bridge to Nowhere" and standing up for her values she may have made enemies.

Except she wasn't against the Bridge to Nowhere. The fact that she was lying about that was one of the very first embarrassing things to come out about her this weekend.
posted by EarBucket at 6:46 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Ya know, if McCain really does go down in flames on this Palin thing, we will have the anti-abortionists to thank.

Funny because yesterday I kept thinking that if Palin ends up being President of the United States, we will have the anti-abortionists to thank.

From the original story appearing inThe Anchorage Daily News Feb. 1, 1997:
City librarian Mary Ellen Emmons will stay, but Police Chief Irl Stambaugh is on his own, Wasilla Mayor Sarah Palin announced Friday. The decision came one day after letters signed by Palin were dropped on Stambaugh's and Emmon's desks, telling them their jobs were over as of Feb. 13.

The mayor told them she appreciated their service but felt it was time for a change. ''I donot feel I have your full support in my efforts to govern the city of Wasilla. Therefore I intend to terminate your employment ...'' the letter said.

Palin said Friday she now feels Emmons supports her but does not feel the same about Stambaugh. As to what prompted the change, Palin said she now has Emmons' assurance that she is behind her. She refused to give details about how Stambaugh has not supported her, saying only that ''You know in your heart when someone is supportive of you.''
So she governs by heart. That's good to know, and reminds me of George Bush who "goes by his gut."
The actions have caused a stir in Wasilla, a town of about 4,600.
When I first started reading about Palin...3 days ago...if was "the city of Wasilla, pop. 8000." Man, that place just keeps getting smaller and smaller.
Emmons, who has been the city's library director for seven years, would not comment about the affair.
I hope Mary Ellen Baker nee Emmons changes her mind.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 6:48 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Konolia: Uh, no, he didn't.
Ever hear of Ron Paul?


4cm used the term "social conservative," which I think Paul himself might find inapplicable. Paul's conservatism has more to do with a semi-strict constructionism than with any appeal to the social mores (religious or otherwise) of yesteryear.
posted by kid ichorous at 6:49 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Intrade's opened a contract on Palin dropping out. That's an ominous sign.
posted by EarBucket at 6:53 AM on September 2, 2008


Also, Ron Paul got trounced in the primaries by Huckabee, not to mention McCain. Trying to sell the Constitution to the Republican Party at this point in history is like trying to sell books to a bunch of sorority girls on spring break. They're liberated from all that now.
posted by kid ichorous at 6:55 AM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Maybe Palin can talk about the secessionist stuff at the GOP's little "Country First" convention.
posted by the_bone at 6:55 AM on September 2, 2008


Senior McCain officials described themselves as "unsurprised" today as huge storms of locusts flew from Wasilla, Alaska and descended upon McCain campaign headquarters. "Locusts were vetted. Locusts were vetted in the vet" said one campaign official, who spoke without attribution out of concern that he would be devoured by a verminous flying cloud.
posted by EarBucket at 6:56 AM on September 2, 2008


I'm talking about the fundamentalists now. There are-or at least were-lots of folks out there nuts for him in that constituency. Seriously.
posted by konolia at 6:56 AM on September 2, 2008


Konolia's right. I know quite a few conservative evangelical/fundamentalist types who are huge Ron Paul supporters. I haven't had a chance to talk to any of them since the Palin pick, though I'm interested to find out how it affects their vote.
posted by EarBucket at 6:59 AM on September 2, 2008


I think they are setting her up to say goodbye.

She will be all0wed to go out as a true american christian maverick. She has every right to now proclaim "This is causing too much of a burden on my family, I respectfully decline the nomination."

The fact that no one even did a back ground check with the FBI is astounding. Didn't anybody learn from the Geraldine Ferrarro problem - her husband had quite a few shady business interests.

She has a very thin resume - that "Bridge to Nowhere" debacle wouldn't stand up to any scrutiny, but it's the only thing the rest of the country has heard of in Alaska politics. The campaigns from this point onward are all just broad strokes to garner the attention of those that just don't pay any real attention, but vote. Voters with any real stake have already decided.


Hell0 VP nominee Lieberman! ( Well, he's there at the convention - all dressed up and ready to go.)
posted by readery at 7:00 AM on September 2, 2008


Ever hear of Ron Paul

Ron Paul -- or really, Bob Barr, since he is the official candidate of the LP -- polls at less than 2 percent nationally in the best of circumstances. His strongest support comes from people who despise McCain and the GOP, and who worked actively (still are) to disrupt the GOP.

So McCain peels of one percent or so of the electorate from the LP, thanks to Palin. And so he gets another 1-2 percent out to the polls from the base. (The percentage of GOP identified social conservatives who might turn out with Palin on the ticket who would have stayed home or voted LP with Lieberman or Ridge or Pawlenty on the ticket).

The fact that McCain *needs* to shore up his "base" is the point. People do not vote for the vice president. He had to make a tactical decision that would appeal to the far right and evangelical holdouts, and avoid antagonizing them with a pro-choice moderate, but he has done so at the expense of a significant number of independents. The polling results are *already* showing this -- Obama is up with a clear bounce for a fourth or fifth straight day in all but one major national poll, and his numbers appear (at least in today's Rasmussen) to be improving as the Palin an Gustav stories play out. Those numbers show independent and moderate support for Obama firming up steadily since his blockbuster speech in Denver was watched by 40 million "real" Americans curious about the cut of his jib. All but three or four major commenters, including titans of the right, have said Obama's speech was just intimidatingly good. Shoot, Pat Buchanan was at a loss for words before calling it the best he'd ever seen. The "close the deal" meme has just died, along with the "experience" meme. The new question is: how desperate is John McCain, or is he just reckless with big decisions? Also, how long will he survive in office? How is his health? Or can you picture Sarah Palin negotiating with Putin or Akhmadinejab?

I've actually met Sarah Palin -- this summer, on the North Slope, albeit for a brief handshake. She's an appealing person, and she is well liked by the working class and Native people I know in Alaska for her personal qualities. But those same people were voting for Obama in large numbers -- and we're not talking latte liberals here -- and I suspect they are more stunned than overjoyed to see Governor Palin on the McCain ticket. They know Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin is a friend of theirs. And she ain't no Joe Biden. Some will no doubt support her and thus McCain, now, out of local pride, and Alaska was going red anyway, despite surprisingly close poll numbers. But knowing Alaska as I do, which is pretty well, I guffawed when I heard she was McCain's pick, and from what I hear the reaction was pretty similar across the state.

The pregnancy thing is beneath discussion and a private family matter. In Alaska, teenage pregnancy is very common in rural communities, and this is an unsurprising revelation even for the governor. Barack Obama is the son of a teenage mom. And decent people do not use children for political cannon fodder. But the story is going to be out there for a long time, and an amplifier of the "culture war" move McCain is making here -- the real Hail Mary pass is to change the election from either the economy or national security and go for the fading but still dangerous terrain of God, Guns, and Gays.

Not gonna work. This election is about big things, and the American people seem to get it for once.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:11 AM on September 2, 2008 [16 favorites]


Intrade's opened a contract on Palin dropping out. That's an ominous sign.

Wow, and it's a bargain. I wish I had some money on there.
posted by Perplexity at 7:15 AM on September 2, 2008


PS -- Five percent of the evangelical/social conservative vote is about 2 percent of the total electorate; if McCain can up his base turnout by five percent with Palin, he'll be thrilled.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:16 AM on September 2, 2008


jayder writes "I don't understand why those Alaska Republican legislators who were interviewed by the New York Times were so open about the fact that Palin was not vetted. Are they trying to destroy her nomination? It would seem that, as Republicans and (presumably) Palin supporters, they would want to give the illusion that she was carefully vetted; instead, they are bending over backwards to confirm everyone's suspicion that she was not vetted, and they are being strangely forthcoming about that information."

Could be they are afraid the fall out will stick to them. IE: they want to avoid anyone casting dispersions on their judgement by making it clear no one asked them about her as it might be assumed McCain consulted with them.
posted by Mitheral at 7:18 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Heh. Go to the RNC's official convention schedule for tonight and you get this:

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2008
CHECK BACK SOON FOR UPDATES

Rudy Giuliani's been bumped tonight in favor of Fred Thompson. There's a part of me that wonders if it's because he's replacing Palin on the ticket tomorrow.
posted by EarBucket at 7:22 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Establishment Republicans in Alaska do not like Sarah Palin. They see this as an opportunity to destroy her in the state as she takes down the McCain ticket. They are making lemonade out of lemons.

She's a stupendously stupid pick by McCain. Obama supporters, not only *should* we take the high road here for moral and political reasons alike; but we also don't have any *need* to take the low road. It doesn't lead anywhere that McCain/Palin aren't already headed. After last Thursday, Barack Obama -- and his supporters -- can and should stay above the petty media-driven fray and let the GOP hang itself. It's doing a fine job, almost as impressive as their management of the Iraq war and the Katrina aftermath. After this week, McCain will never get above 45 percent again.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:26 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Wah? They bumped noun-verb-9/11 for sleepy Grampy Snooze? We aren't gonna get the terror, terror, terra speech?

My god, no message discipline, no agenda the day of the event? Amateur hour at the RNC.
posted by orthogonality at 7:31 AM on September 2, 2008


Wow, EarBucket. My spidey-sense tingled right there. Good call. I was not getting why they'd drop Rudy, unless the "messy family" backstory was a concern in the current context. Or maybe Rudy took himself out after seeing the disaster Palin looks to be.

I still say bring it on. Replace Palin with a pro-choice, gay-friendly, cross-dressing ethnic New York Catholic with record as corrupt as Palin's and a lot more enemies. Not only will this *infuriate* the dominionist "base" to the point they abandon the GOP at last (some, at least -- and the Dobsons will have egg all over their faces and be very, very angry about it). But it will paint the McCain campaign as being in a total tailspin of poor management.

Nope, McCain handed it to Obama the moment he decided on Palin, and replacing her is only going to make it worse. But that's exactly why I suspect it very well could be in the works.

Because the only way to top Palin is with Rudy! Damn!
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:31 AM on September 2, 2008


"She asked the library how she could go about banning books,"

Now this is a reason to campaign against Palin - this is the single worst thing I've heard about any current candidate.
posted by jb at 7:35 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Because the only way to top Palin is with Rudy!
Not just Rudy! Rudy as an emergency fallback!
posted by dirtdirt at 7:36 AM on September 2, 2008


Also, why did McCain write off Minnesota for the way he treated Pawlenty, and possibly Michigan and the Mormon turnout in Nevada and New Mexico for the way he treated Romney?

Because he needs at least one from Michigan and Minnesota to win, and if he loses Nevada and New Mexico, it will be an Obama landslide in process.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:43 AM on September 2, 2008


Not to tamp down the jubilee, but this seems like a play-limp suckerpunch move. Never choose an inexperienced Alaskan governor when the election is on the line! ahahaha! ahahaha! a-ha...

Palin isn't going anywhere, I don't think.
posted by cashman at 7:44 AM on September 2, 2008


Fred Thompson is who I wanted for the top of the ticket originally.

I'd like to kick his tail for not running a more aggressive campaign. I will be interested in hearing him speak tonight.
posted by konolia at 7:47 AM on September 2, 2008


"She asked the library how she could go about banning book"

Oh yeah, now it's on!
posted by jessamyn at 7:49 AM on September 2, 2008 [48 favorites]


Fred Thompson is who I wanted for the top of the ticket originally.

Makes sense. But it would have been a boring election, what with Obama winning 70/30.
posted by fourcheesemac at 7:51 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


konolia writes "I will be interested in hearing [Fred Thompson] speak tonight."

Me too; I'm out of Ambien.
posted by orthogonality at 8:06 AM on September 2, 2008 [14 favorites]


we are conceding that conservatives are right, and personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy.
I wouldn't go so far as to say that they disqualify someone, but would you go so far as to say that personal choices do not matter at all? I completely agree that some of the discussions about her private life are disgusting, but those have nothing to do with Palin's choices. I think that the choices that Palin made herself, like flewing cross country with ruptured membranes do tell us something about her (lack of) judgement (if true).
posted by davar at 8:11 AM on September 2, 2008


PS -- Five percent of the evangelical/social conservative vote is about 2 percent of the total electorate; if McCain can up his base turnout by five percent with Palin, he'll be thrilled.

evangelical/social conservative make up 40% of the population?
posted by afu at 8:12 AM on September 2, 2008


It'll be like five minutes in before you realize that you're on A&E watching a rerun of Melting Pot.
posted by cortex at 8:14 AM on September 2, 2008


And when liberals and progressives pounce on rumors like this one about Trig's "true" parentage — whether or not it is true, which I'm pretty sure it's not — or rumors about Republican politicians' sexuality (in the absence of crimes committed) we are conceding that conservatives are right, and personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy

But personal choices do qualify or disqualify candidates. The problem is that Left and Right differ on what those qualities are. For the Right, John McCain, service man really matters and says something. For the Left, it matters also, just in a different way.

The pregnancy thing is beneath discussion and a private family matter.

Of course it's not beneath discussion. She's got five kids, four of them under 18, one of them pregnant, one newborn with special needs and dad isn't home taking care of the kids, so who is? Seriously, the GOP has this family first image and then wants to nominate someone for VP who doesn't, at first glance, appear to be very family first?

And yes, there is a double standard here.


I think they are setting her up to say goodbye.

Hell no. I get the impression that Palin's head is too big for her to go for that and if she isn't willingly going, then there's no way to get rid of her, without losing the election.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 8:23 AM on September 2, 2008


Nope, McCain handed it to Obama the moment he decided on Palin, and replacing her is only going to make it worse.

What if not Palin, but McCain is the one that will be replaced?
Replacing McCain by someone younger would also take a lot of momentum out of those accusations of lack of experience.
posted by sour cream at 8:24 AM on September 2, 2008


What if not Palin, but McCain is the one that will be replaced?

Not in a million years. The GOP couldn't send a worse signal if their delegates lit their hair on fire and ran around the convention floor screaming "We're all gonna die! We're all gonna die!"
posted by EarBucket at 8:29 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


I live in Cambridge, MA, and only know one bona fide Republican, so often use him as a sounding board on how 'the other half' thinks. His reaction to the two VP choices was really interesting: he felt that Obama's choice of Biden reflected a real wish to put county/experience first (what with the 'clean' comment and all), and that McCain's choice of Palin reeked of political opportunism. My friend has never been a big fan of McCain (he rooted for Huckabee), but is now saying that he is considering voting for Obama (much to my surprise). I hope this pattern might play out on a broader scale across the country.
posted by AwkwardPause at 8:30 AM on September 2, 2008


evangelical/social conservative make up 40% of the population?

This recent Roll Call article analyzes the question in some detail.
posted by Perplexity at 8:30 AM on September 2, 2008


Ever hear of Ron Paul?

Not lately! And considering that he hasn't been registering so much as a blip on the state-by-state polls for months indicates that he's not really a significant threat in turning, oh I don't know, Alabama or South Carolina blue by virtue of his magical vote-pulling-away abilities.

I know a couple of Ron Paul supporters (all from the West and Pacific Northwest, by the way) -- they're with him to the end specifically because he's an anti-tax isolationist who favors the gold standard. Those folks, my dear, ain't gonna decide this race. They never were.
posted by scody at 8:31 AM on September 2, 2008


The GOP couldn't send a worse signal if their delegates lit their hair on fire and ran around the convention floor screaming "We're all gonna die! We're all gonna die!"
Huh? That worked very well for them in their 2004 convention.
posted by Flunkie at 8:34 AM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


I'm using a very generous estimation of the percentage of the electorate that votes substantially or exclusively on the basis of core social conservative/dominionist principles. It's probably closer to 20 percent if they have high turnout and leaving aside the question of how many millions of new (and young) voters Obama brings out this time. That's why I guessed Palin helps, at the margin, with no negatives, McCain by about one to two percent if she drives base turnout up by five percent.

This is not exact science. Voters can and do surprise the experts and lie to pollsters.
posted by fourcheesemac at 8:36 AM on September 2, 2008


I met a Republican while I was out canvassing Sunday afternoon. He thinks Obama's a socialist and doesn't agree with him about anything, but he's voting for him anyway. He's scared that McCain will start WWIII with Russia, and is absolutely horrified by the idea that Palin could become president if something happened to McCain. He thinks that Obama and Biden are both smart and responsible, whatever his policy differences with them, and that the country will survive four years of liberal rule and maybe the GOP will get its act back together. I don't think he's going to be the only one.
posted by EarBucket at 8:38 AM on September 2, 2008


> Ever hear of Ron Paul?

Not lately!


Have you tried Google?
posted by cortex at 8:38 AM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


It'll be like five minutes in before you realize that you're on A&E watching a rerun

That's it. This whole thing, from the announcement to the podcast 'walking' interview, to the stories. It's an episode of Murder She Wrote. Sarah Palin even sounds like a character from there. The coverage, the footage, the style - it's Murder She Wrote. So that explains why I felt like I was waiting for the suckerpunch ending.
posted by cashman at 8:40 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


> Ever hear of Ron Paul?

Not lately!


I'm thankful that, during the past few months, we've been spared the annoyance of having to endure Ron Paul supporters taking up bandwidth just to remind us that he exists. I'm secretly hoping that Ron Paul's alterna-convention is actually some kind of Honey Pot.
posted by mkultra at 8:42 AM on September 2, 2008


And when liberals and progressives pounce on rumors like this one about Trig's "true" parentage — whether or not it is true, which I'm pretty sure it's not — or rumors about Republican politicians' sexuality (in the absence of crimes committed) we are conceding that conservatives are right, and personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy.
Of course, many of the people supporting Obama really are social conservatives, who really do think that personal issues should matter. Andrew Sullivan is an economic conservative, I'm not sure what his stance is on personal stuff like this.

But, how many of you would have considered voting for John Edwards in the primary if it came out he was having an Affair? Personal choices can affect your ability to govern (Just look at what happened to Clinton) and get elected.
And the Washington Post's op-ed page is comparing Palin to Caligula's horse.
Oh, well that's classy.

Wait, Richard Cohen? The guy who thinks he's funnier then Steven Colbert and that Algebra is useless? That guy? Well, I hope no one takes his statements as being indicative of the "left" (not that "the left" has done itself any favors in promoting the ridiculous fake baby story, but those people weren't being printed in the WaPo)

I was thinking about this though, I mean the pick does dovetail nicely with something that's been common in the GOP lately, picking people based on their ideological background, not their talent. It's almost like the hard core christianists are actually unaware of how to even measure talent.

Sarah Palin is just the ultimate expression of this.
McCain already had that vote locked up
Uh, no, he didn't.

Ever hear of Ron Paul?
-- konolia
What kind of self-respecting Paulite would be swayed by putting a book banner on the ticket?
posted by delmoi at 8:42 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Have you tried Google?

McCain's vetting team tried that for Sarah Palin. Apparently it doesn't work well yet.
posted by fourcheesemac at 8:45 AM on September 2, 2008


What kind of self-respecting Paulite would be swayed by putting a book banner on the ticket?

Books are paid for by TAXES. Burn them all!
posted by Artw at 8:48 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Have you tried Google?

Yeah, but it made me all drowsy and irritable.
posted by aihal at 8:53 AM on September 2, 2008


Have you tried Google?

McCain's vetting team tried that for Sarah Palin. Apparently it doesn't work well yet.


Actually they used Webcrawler AND Ask Jeeves.
posted by birdherder at 8:54 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


Not lately! And considering that he hasn't been registering so much as a blip on the state-by-state polls for months indicates that he's not really a significant threat in turning, oh I don't know, Alabama or South Carolina blue by virtue of his magical vote-pulling-away abilities.

I was reading, though, that Bob Barr is polling at upwards of 6% in some states. No, he won't turn Alabama or Oklahoma blue, but given how libertarian Nevada is, it could make a difference there.

core social conservative/dominionist principles.

Those aren't the same things. The Dominionists aren't going to vote much for McCain, since he's not One Of Them. And putting a woman in leadership will drive a few away.

It's probably closer to 20 percent if they have high turnout and leaving aside the question of how many millions of new (and young) voters Obama brings out this time.


If 78% evangelicals support McCain (which is what I saw in the last poll), then that's 5-8% below last time out. And last time out, too, you saw a very late surge by evangelicals and fundamentalists motivated by anti-gay-marriage amendments and a stealth get-out-the-vote campaign.

Of course, that same group demanded that Bush spend his political capital on them, and he gave them two SCOTUS seats, Terri Schiavo... and that's it. And in a way, they're kinda mad about it.

That's why I guessed Palin helps, at the margin, with no negatives, McCain by about one to two percent if she drives base turnout up by five percent.

If it pushes McCain back over 80% support from evangelicals, sure. But the ones I've talked to have either already been in the tank for Obama or are really worried about Palin's inexperience and McCain's decision making. He might net the 3% overall (which assumes that 8% pickup from evangelicals) he needs to pull even, but that assumes Palin doesn't drive off more than that just by being her.

It's what some person on the web said somewhere in an article I can't remember -- a veep pick doesn't really help you that much but it can hurt you a heck of a lot.
posted by dw at 8:57 AM on September 2, 2008


And putting a woman in leadership will drive a few away.

Nah, symbolically she’s his wife. Like Bush and Condi.
posted by Artw at 8:58 AM on September 2, 2008


However, when you start banning library books, or leaning on librarians to pull titles that don't meet with your specific family's values, that is a bridge too far for me. Seriously. I'm livid now.

It's none of our business if Palin wants to have a few little book burnings.

When liberals and progressives pounce on her desire to torch literature, we concede that conservatives are right, and that personal choices do qualify or disqualify one for certain aspects of participation in public life and this democracy.

Why don't you liberal communist Muslims just mind your own business?
posted by Blazecock Pileon at 9:05 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


The Mat-Su Cinema
posted by neroli at 9:07 AM on September 2, 2008


What's with all these people out there who apparently think that Obama's a socialist? Do they think he's lying about his proposed policies or do they think what he's saying and doing is what a socialist says and does? I truly don't get it.
posted by sveskemus at 9:08 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


dw, to be clear, I agree with you entirely. I am posing a worst-case scenario where Palin really galvanizes evangelical voters and dominionist conservatives (not always the same people) and does drive the numbers up to ca. 2004. It's still from a smaller pool, in a year when it matters less, and Obama still wins unless McCain can take a majority of all independents.

The cultural argument is that a large number of "Reagan democrat" types can be bamboozled into supporting the dominionist platform with homophobia and abortion hysteria (so to speak). Add a little immigrant bashing, except McCain can't afford to lose New Mexico or Michigan.

And the message of the Obama campaign to the American people is that we're smarter than that, and we've had enough of it.

We're missing the obvious equation here: Sarah Palin is George Bush with street cred.
posted by fourcheesemac at 9:10 AM on September 2, 2008


She does coke?
posted by Artw at 9:13 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


This is a pretty damning indictment of Palin's experience as a mayor.
posted by empath at 9:22 AM on September 2, 2008 [13 favorites]


Obama's doubled his lead in the Rasmussen tracking poll overnight, from 3 points to 6. That almost certainly means he had a double-digit lead in yesterday's sample. It could be an outlier, and we'll know better when we see tomorrow's numbers, but it sure doesn't look like Palin's helping any.
posted by EarBucket at 9:26 AM on September 2, 2008


This is a pretty damning indictment of Palin's experience as a mayor.

Wow. She IS Bush!
posted by Artw at 9:28 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Blazecock Pileon, no worries - I know how hard it is to tell the difference between public libraries and private vaginas. Especially since they're both increasingly being regulated by the state.
posted by DarlingBri at 9:29 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


This is a pretty damning indictment of Palin's experience as a mayor.

Wow. She turned rural Alaska into Renaissance Florence. McCain is going find himself with a mysterious stiletto-shaped wound in his belly if he ever gives in to his obvious desire to hit it. If he doesn't, maybe he'll get away with a light poisoning or an unfortunate accidental smothering.
posted by nasreddin at 9:30 AM on September 2, 2008


Oh, wow.
posted by cavalier at 9:30 AM on September 2, 2008


Okay, there are clearly a lot of questions she should be answering. Where is she today, and why isn't she doing at least 1 interview talking about all this? The press should be questioning her intensely over all this information about her job record.
posted by cashman at 9:32 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wow, empath, that answers a lot of my questions such as: Were books banned so that the librarian could keep her job? According to your link : City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter.

But it is the information about the way she budgets that is really disheartening-- spend the state's surplus but borrow for future projects. Leave your small town with a new $22 Million debt for unnecessary projects. Proving that she is fiscally irresponsible should dim some of her shiny new toy status.
posted by Secret Life of Gravy at 9:37 AM on September 2, 2008



But it is the information about the way she budgets that is really disheartening-- spend the state's surplus but borrow for future projects. Leave your small town with a new $22 Million debt for unnecessary projects. Proving that she is fiscally irresponsible should dim some of her shiny new toy status.


Are you kidding? That's proof that she's Republican governing material. After all, that's exactly the same policy as the Republicans have followed in Washington for the last decade.
posted by nasreddin at 9:39 AM on September 2, 2008


City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter.
Well, that's encouraging. Maybe they should build a campaign slogan off of this:

PALIN '08: TECHNICALLY, NEVER ACTUALLY FIRED A LIBRARIAN!
posted by Flunkie at 9:42 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Wow, that Sullivan piece is something. I told you people who knew Alaska guffawed when she was picked, and this explains it -- this stuff is all pretty widely known.

She's a genuine Tracy Flick, with guns.
posted by fourcheesemac at 9:42 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Sarah Palin, member of the Alaskan Independence Party
"In March, 2008, Sarah Palin recorded a video welcoming the convention of the secessionist Alaskan Independence Party (AIP), saying 'we have a great promise to be a self-sufficient state, made up of the hardest working, most grateful Americans in our nation.'

In October, 2007, Dexter Clark, the AIP's vice chairman, was recorded on video saying that Palin had been a registered member of the AIP before switching to the GOP to be viable.

In the same video, Clark says 'the Federal goverment is just plain a monster' and 'we don't say we are Americans, we say we are Alaskans.'

Clark's comments were delivered at 'The Second North American Secessionist Convention' in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

AIP's motto is 'Alaska First. Alaska Always'

[video | 01:23]
"John McCain has a problem with patriotism -- he keeps talking about putting America first, but his running mate, Sarah Palin, was a member of the Alaska Independence Party, a political party that would put Alaska first by seceding from the U.S. She addressed that group -- this year...

Okay, imagine, just imagine, a Democratic candidate being a member of a party where people say they're not Americans. It would be over. Over.

This also means another warped GOP attack off the table, too. While McCain should have been vetting his running mate, he was instead attacking Obama's patriotism. That's over. McCain can never again even raise that issue when his running mate wanted her state to be its own country.

John McCain did not vet Sarah Palin. His running mate belonged to a party that wanted to secede from the U.S. When was the last time anyone on a ticket wanted that? 1856? 1860?" *
posted by ericb at 9:44 AM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Would be nice to hear what former librarian and national literacy advocate Laura Bush thinks about Palin wanting to ban books and fire library workers, and since the news media is notorious for doing its actual job I'm sure we'll hear them asking that question any day now.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 9:45 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


McCain Fought Teen Pregnancy Programs.
posted by ericb at 9:46 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


She turned rural Alaska into Renaissance Florence

Actually, this sounds like many an Alaskan town's politics to me. Usually, the lines are drawn between prominent families, but the surge of far right evangelical power in the last decade has disrupted the older networks of corruption and replaced them with new ones that look in every respect like business as usual, except they've somewhat redrawn the lines for white/Native relations.

And anyone familiar with the rural South knows this pattern too. It's been cleaned up a lot in recent years -- you can think of Alaska as being like, say, Alabama or Texas in the 1950s in some respects. Local politics, far off the federal radar or national media radar -- it gets ugly. In fact, one thing everyone hates in Alaska is the federal government, which occasionally comes in to enforce rules the rest of us take somewhat for granted (the Stevens prosecution is seen as overkill in Alaska, for example, given that he's done so many much more corrupt things than let VECO fix his house up).
posted by fourcheesemac at 9:48 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Obama's doubled his lead in the Rasmussen tracking poll overnight, from 3 points to 6. That almost certainly means he had a double-digit lead in yesterday's sample.

Not once folks realize that she single-handedly kept the Soviet Union from even considering a U.S. invasion via Alaska for nearly 20 years!
posted by scody at 9:50 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Boy, this Palin thing is sure going like a house on fire.
posted by dirtdirt at 9:54 AM on September 2, 2008


'October Surprise' Over Palin Investigation?
"Is the McCain campaign afraid of an 'October surprise' involving vice-presidential pick Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska?

The Alaska state senator running an investigation of Gov. Palin says the McCain campaign is using stall tactics to prevent him from releasing his final report by Oct. 31, four days before the November election.

'It's likely to be damaging to the Governor,' said Senator Hollis French, a Democrat, appointed the project manager for a bi-partisan State Senate Legislative Counsel Committee investigation of claims that Palin abused her office to get the Alaska public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, fired."
An Anchorage Daily News story suggests that Palin's lawyer is helping stall the investigation. He's trying to get the probe into the hands of a governor-appointed board:
"The state has hired a private lawyer to represent Gov. Sarah Palin's office in the Legislature's investigation into the firing of former Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan. The lawyer already has challenged whether lawmakers even have authority to oversee the inquiry.

...Van Flein said the investigation should be handled by the state Personnel Board, not the Legislature, because it's 'statutorily mandated' to handle ethics cases. The three-member Personnel Board is appointed by the governor."
And he's making it difficult for Special Counsel Steve Branchflower to interview Palin:
"Branchflower hasn't been able to set up an interview with Palin. French said the state will fly Branchflower to wherever Palin is on the campaign trail if needed.

'Clearly the governor's new political role will make it more challenging for her to make time for this investigation,' French wrote. But Palin needs to be interviewed sometime in September, he said.

Van Flein said the investigation is 'bad timing' in the middle of a presidential campaign. He said he couldn't guarantee her availability this month."*
posted by ericb at 9:54 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


This thread has now made it to the Kennedy administration. Presumably we can expect a complete derail around comments 1974 and 2001.
posted by wabbittwax at 9:55 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


make that the Johnson administration.
posted by wabbittwax at 9:56 AM on September 2, 2008


why is the Sullivan piece so damming when it quotes one person with little citation?
I know a guy who has probably 100 books about Clinton (Bill) and these are all 'eye wittiness" to some personal evil he perpetuated against them or other individuals.
I sorta wonder if folks here are reading anything besides Atlantic, HufPo and Kos.
Susan Estrich, for one example...and an 'inside peek' at evangelicals here
I simply mean, why be so dismissive with such scant hearsay evidence? Why so cocksure? Why all the confetti around here?
Oh I know why, but it's so fucking predictable my lovely friends.
posted by dawson at 9:59 AM on September 2, 2008


what I meant re the books about Bill is simply that a lot of people have a lot of axes to grind and just saying a thing does not make it true,or even stick. What he 'overcame' to be POTUS was much, much more than this flouncy tempest in a teapot.
posted by dawson at 10:02 AM on September 2, 2008


Palin Received Millions In Earmarks, Clouding Reformer Image
"News continues to break regarding vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin that could, in the long term, pose serious problems to one of the main thrusts of the McCain campaign: the message of conservative reform.

The presentation of Palin as an anti-earmark, fiscally conscious pol is challenged by a review of recent political records. As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she hired the firm of Hoffman Silver Gilman & Blasco to help secure spending projects for her town. The expenditure apparently paid off. From 2000 through 2002, Wasilla received more than $5.5 million in federal cash for transportation and social service projects.

According to the group Citizens Against Government Waste, the city received $1 million for a bus facility in 2000. In 2001, the Wasilla Health Center was granted a half million dollars for a community mental health center. That same year the city's emergency shelter also was granted $500,000 for a transitional living program for homeless youth. A year later, the Wasilla regional dispatch center received $1 million in pork, the city was granted $1.5 million for water and sewer improvements, and received an additional $600,000 for a bus facility.

The use of the earmark system that -- as a vice presidential candidate -- Palin now criticizes continued into her tenure as governor. As the Los Angeles Times reported, the state of Alaska requested 31 earmarks worth $197.8 million for next year's federal budget. And according to Citizens Against Government Waste, Alaska received $379,669,715 in pork during fiscal year 2008, nearly $100 million more than any other state.

...John McCain has made earmark bashing a cornerstone of his campaign, calling the spending projects a 'gateway to corruption.' And since taking on the responsibility of running mate, Palin too has presented herself as a thorn in the side of the earmark culture."
posted by ericb at 10:02 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


From the Sullivan piece:

When Sarah's mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and experienced manager, ran for Mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her.

Didn't I read somewhere a quote from Palin's mother in law, questioning whether Palin was qualified for the VP spot? I guess this explains why.
posted by jayder at 10:04 AM on September 2, 2008


I sorta wonder if folks here are reading anything besides Atlantic, HufPo and Kos.

Yes. Check out http://mudflats.wordpress.com/, a blog about Alaskan politics written by an Alaskan.

Also check out Anchorage Daily News. There's a ton of information out there.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 10:05 AM on September 2, 2008


why is the Sullivan piece so damming when it quotes one person with little citation?

If you click the link the person who wrote it signed her real name and included her email address. If you question it, feel free to email her, but it's worth nothing that I've seen nearly everything she mentions backed up by MSM reporting.
posted by empath at 10:07 AM on September 2, 2008


Michelle Obama was raked over the coals and denounced as unpatriotic for an awkwardly-worded sentence in a speech. Sarah Palin belonged to an organization that wanted to secede from the Union. I'm sure the conservatives will be excoriating her treasonous lack of patriotism any minute now.

Rudy Giuliani's been bumped tonight in favor of Fred Thompson. There's a part of me that wonders if it's because he's replacing Palin on the ticket tomorrow.

Replacing Palin with Giuliani would make McCain look even more wishy-washy. We know his short list was Lieberman, Tom Ridge, and a player-to-be-named-later. Romney and Huckleberry didn't make the short list (neither did Cheney, who McCain said in 2001 that he'd pick). Giuliani's the ideological opposite of Palin, and he'd probably lose at least as many right-wingers as he'd gain moderates.

But, how many of you would have considered voting for John Edwards in the primary if it came out he was having an Affair?

Sure, I would have considered it (I ended up supporting Obama, but would've gladly supported Edwards if he were the nominee). I don't think other people's family lives are my business, and John Edwards wasn't running on a platform that wants to control other people's personal lives. Palin is, so it matters if she doesn't walk the walk while she's talking the talk. (Actually, Edwards' lying about the affair bothers me more than the affair itself does, but more because it's stupid to lie in a situation like that when you're going to get caught.)
posted by kirkaracha at 10:07 AM on September 2, 2008


The Campbell Brown smackdown jamstigator was referring to is also here. It wasn't nearly as funny as the James Carville/Stephanie Miller/Michele Bachmann Turner Overdrive smackdown later last night, though.
posted by bitter-girl.com at 10:09 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin:
"A real test of a presidential candidate’s judgment is his choice of a running mate — the person who is next in line to become the commander in chief. As we face serious global challenges and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, John McCain has chosen someone with virtually no national security or foreign policy experience. This choice calls into question both Sen. McCain’s judgment and a McCain administration’s ability to lead a nation in crisis. To the extent that this choice represents an effort to court supporters of Hillary Clinton’s historic candidacy, McCain misjudges the reasons so many voters rallied around her candidacy. It was Sen. Clinton’s experience, skill and commitment to change, especially in the areas of health care and energy policy, that drew such strong support. Sarah Palin’s opposition to Roe v. Wade and her support of Big Oil will not draw Democrats from the Obama-Biden ticket."
posted by ericb at 10:12 AM on September 2, 2008


Thanks Brandon, I'll look at those, but still...I hate this kinda gotcha politics shit and I think some people are playing right into a grand trap...obviously I could be totally wrong.
posted by dawson at 10:13 AM on September 2, 2008


Palin Candidacy Death Watch.
posted by ericb at 10:16 AM on September 2, 2008



Thanks Brandon, I'll look at those, but still...I hate this kinda gotcha politics shit and I think some people are playing right into a grand trap...obviously I could be totally wrong.


In what world does looking into someone's horrific (but mercifully small) record in government count as "gotcha politics"? And then what doesn't count as "gotcha politics"?
posted by nasreddin at 10:16 AM on September 2, 2008


Obama on Palin 'experience':
"My understanding is that Gov. Palin’s town, Wassilla, has I think 50 employees. We've got 2500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe 12 million dollars a year – we have a budget of about three times that just for the month...Our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the past couple of years and certainly in terms of the legislation I’ve passed in the past couple of years, post-Katrina."
posted by ericb at 10:17 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Interesting. Seems that not everyone on the Christian Right has gotten the memo that they're supposed to be embracing the Palins as the paragons of pro-life values. Oh, and those average American families (even those who weren't leaning to McCain) who are all going to forget about policy issues because they will "relate" to Sarah Palin so strongly that they will now be more sympathetic to the GOP ticket? Some of them aren't impressed, either.
posted by scody at 10:17 AM on September 2, 2008


I was wrong to have said stuff about the daughter and boyfriend. I've always disliked the effects of accidental celebrity and how it gives us permission to target people who don't have a choice to be publicly scrutinized. I think Palin has done her daughter no favors, and that her own actions are fair game, because she used her "story" and her family to boost her thin resume. I might seek some justification in the fact that we're talking about nomination to a powerful position, or that details surrounding it have created a crazy upside-down world in which Republicans are cheering teen pregnancy; but I can't really say that makes me comfortable about my own commentary wrt those who didn't have a choice in all this. I apologize, and I'll try to do better.
posted by troybob at 10:18 AM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


just saying a thing does not make it true,or even stick

Oh, you mean Barack Obama is not a radical Muslim terrorist who eats the flag for breakfast with milk poured by his America-hating wife?

Shit, now you tell us.
posted by fourcheesemac at 10:20 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.
posted by iviken at 10:24 AM on September 2, 2008



In what world does looking into someone's horrific (but mercifully small) record in government ...


I'm not referring to that, but to the OMG Jerry Springer stuff. I don't care, I don't care where Obama goes to church and what his pastor thinks either. Or about Rezco (sp) or Biden and asbestos really. I mean at some point a character question enters in, but I find much of this distasteful and pathetic. I'm heartened by the idea that Obama himself is above it and wants to be elected because he's smart change, not because a teenager in Alaska got preggers.
Try the shoe on the other foot. You gotta know this is bottom of the barrel 3 pointer attempt from the opponents half kinda desperation stuff.
posted by dawson at 10:29 AM on September 2, 2008


Giuliani's the ideological opposite of Palin, and he'd probably lose at least as many right-wingers as he'd gain moderates.

Indeed. The howl from the Christian conservatives would be intense.

But really ... I'd be completely gobsmacked if McCain didn't try to stay on this horse, even if it plunged over a cliff. If Palin steps out, it'd go down as the biggest presidential campaign gaffe since the dawn of the television age. If she stays in and McCain loses, McCain's loss goes down in history as a footnote in Obama's Wikipedia entry.

McCain's wishing right now that he vetted her better. He'd have done better with a different no-name candidate.

You know who's looking like a great Republican candidate right now? I'd say Bobby Jindal has a great line on 2012 and 2016.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 10:30 AM on September 2, 2008


Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.

And the spotlight continues to heat up!
posted by ericb at 10:30 AM on September 2, 2008


Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.

That's not Bristol Palin, that's her boyfriend's sister.
posted by empath at 10:32 AM on September 2, 2008


I have been following this story since it broke via this thread. I have followed it rabidly over the past 72 hours. I am now very happy to see the mainstream media run with the story. That Carville piece on Larry King was priceless. All of the helpless tittering in the background is, I think, how most people serious about politics view this nomination.
posted by msali at 10:34 AM on September 2, 2008



Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.


That see, what the fuck is that about. I didn't click the link, so perhaps it's a joke? I don't wanna be near that kinda sick shit.
Anyway, time for me to work a bit.
posted by dawson at 10:36 AM on September 2, 2008


Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.

Since this has nothing to do with Sarah Palin's candidacy and is really just a smear on a 17-year-old girl, I'm not sure why you posted it.
posted by dirigibleman at 10:40 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Uncomfortable Schadenfreude reading the Levi mock blog and what the media's doing with the unmarried teen, self-declared redneck stud, shotgun wedding story. Hardly daring to feel relief that this publicity fiasco may put Obama in the White House and that Michael Moore may have had it wrong about which side the doofuses were on when it comes to "Let's snatch defeat from the jaws of victory."
posted by nickyskye at 10:41 AM on September 2, 2008


I'm starting to become afraid that Palin will withdraw, and McCain will fix his (now obvious) mistake with a bona fide VP candidate -- or at least someone who remotely resembles a bona fide candidate. Palin staying in the race may be the best thing for Obama right now.
posted by pardonyou? at 10:41 AM on September 2, 2008


McCain's wishing right now that he vetted her better.

I doubt it. He's a maverick alright and people laude him for that, while forgetting that you have to make good decisions. Instead McCain behaved like some simple minded idiot and went with his gut. You know else who went with his gut?George Bush. Do we really need more of that?
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 10:42 AM on September 2, 2008


Also: whoa. No wonder Alaskans "like" her, I'd like someone handing out big fat checks for nothing. Paging Dire Straits! We've got a theme song job for you over here...
posted by bitter-girl.com at 10:45 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I agree that public scrutiny of the Palin children should be 'out-of-bounds,' but it's going to happen ... and get even more intense. That's the state of modern politics.

"At several points throughout the process, McCain's team warned Palin that the scrutiny into her private life would be intense and that there was nothing she could do to prepare for it." *
posted by ericb at 10:45 AM on September 2, 2008


I have been following this story since it broke via this thread. I have followed it rabidly over the past 72 hours. I am now very happy to see the mainstream media run with the story. That Carville piece on Larry King was priceless. All of the helpless tittering in the background is, I think, how most people serious about politics view this nomination.
I think you mean "most people serious about governance.

Palin's nomination was politics. It was nothing but politics.
posted by Flunkie at 10:47 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


From here: While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the Librarian are on her enemies list to this day. Sarah complained about the “old boy’s club” when she first ran for Mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of "old boys". Palin fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the City and as Governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people, creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally grateful and fiercely loyal--loyal to the point of abusing their power to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the case of pressuring the State’s top cop.

Sarah Palin is following the Bush Playbook, all right.

We need leaders, not people handing out jobs to incompetent cronies.
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 10:52 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I have been following this story since it broke via this thread. I have followed it rabidly over the past 72 hours.

Yeah, I'm glued to the Internet like my grandma watching Days of Our Lives. I'm all like, hush y'all, Bookhouse's stories are on.
posted by Bookhouse at 10:54 AM on September 2, 2008 [21 favorites]


Flunkie: You're right, but I said 'politics' rather deliberately, because James Carville is about as pure of a political beast as one could be. Governance? Don't even get me started.
posted by msali at 10:56 AM on September 2, 2008


scanning this behemoth and it's a bit old but this exchange is imbalanced

Flunkie: "1 Timothy 2 seems pretty clear - women shouldn't be in positions of authority. They should be silent."

Quonsar: ...said paul, writing to a 1st century church in a pastoral letter, so called because they deal with the qualifications and duties of pastors. nice try, but no cigar. if you are going to quote the bible it would serve you well to equip yourself with even a TINY modicum of knowing WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
posted by quonsar at 5:29 PM on August 31 [1 favorite]


from my experiences being a member of a religion that split primarily over the issue of woman in office, Flunkie is using this bit of biblical wisdom in exactly the manner as those opposed to woman in office do.

So while it may not be as nuanced, or even informed, as Quonsar's view - the use of this passage as rhetoric in this context does pass the test of "knowing WHAT THE FUCK YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT."
posted by sloe at 10:59 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


iviken's link was relevant to me. I'm a friend and political ally of Captain Morgan, and I like to know who he's consorting with.
posted by Faint of Butt at 11:03 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain Campaign Tries To Block Ron Paul From Convention Floor
posted by homunculus at 11:03 AM on September 2, 2008


Video: Should Palin daughter be in the political spotlight?
posted by ericb at 11:03 AM on September 2, 2008


One Republican strategist with close ties to the campaign described the candidate's closest supporters as "keeping their fingers crossed" in hopes that additional information does not force McCain to revisit the decision. According to this Republican, who would discuss internal campaign strategizing only on condition of anonymity, the McCain team used little more than a Google Internet search as part of a rushed effort to review Palin's potential pitfalls. Just over a week ago, Palin was not on McCain's short list of potential running mates, the Republican said.
posted by EarBucket at 11:08 AM on September 2, 2008


This election is about big things, and the American people seem to get it for once.
I really, really hope that's true.
posted by cell divide at 11:08 AM on September 2, 2008


I wasn't going to respond to Quonsar's apoplectic response to me, because I didn't want to derail the thread further. But since sloe brought it up again, I will say what I otherwise would have said at that time:

The idea that the extreme misogyny contained in 1 Timothy 2 is clearly and unequivocably applicable only to selecting bishops, merely because it's part of a letter about selecting bishops and other church matters, strikes me as, at best, facile.

It directly states that women should be silent. It directly states that women should not be in positions of authority over men. It directly states that the reason for these things is that women are directly and solely responsible for mankind's fall from grace with god.

To be clear (again), I find this attitude abhorrent. But the idea that its author did not mean these awful, yet fundamentally basic, ideas to be applicable in any situation except one specific one seems, frankly, like wishful thinking.

I'll shut up about this now.
posted by Flunkie at 11:08 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain Campaign Tries To Block Ron Paul From Convention Floor

Heh, I bet CNN will be all over Republican party "splits", and whether McCain has healed rifts with the Paulites, and yadda yadda yadda.

No-one says "not!" after sarcastic statements anymore, do they?
posted by Artw at 11:10 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


the McCain team used little more than a Google Internet search as part of a rushed effort to review Palin's potential pitfalls.

They should have done it BEFORE they expurgated Wikipedia.
posted by Artw at 11:12 AM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


They should have done it BEFORE they expurgated Wikipedia.

Mavericks make their own rules.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 11:26 AM on September 2, 2008


Heh. Of course if it had happened like that it would have been the perfect metaphor for, well, everything the Republicans have done in the last 8 years really.
posted by Artw at 11:36 AM on September 2, 2008


Ever hear of Ron Paul?

Not lately!


I got a good chuckle last night watching footage of protesters outside the RNC when I realized that one had a Ron Paul shirt on. All I could think was keep hope alive, sister, keep hope alive.
posted by middleclasstool at 11:39 AM on September 2, 2008


More on the story the media dare not inflate tell...
posted by Artw at 11:45 AM on September 2, 2008


Photos of Bristol Palin [...]

Just stop this shit. It's cruel and totally irrelevant. The important issue here is that McCain has chosen someone completely unqualified as his running-mate. Sarah Palin's family has nothing to do with it.
posted by klausness at 11:46 AM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


With the latest bits about Palin's involvement in the Alaska Independence Party in mind, her boneheaded remark about "what a VP does" suddenly makes a hell of a lot more sense:

"We want to make sure that that VP slot would be a fruitful type of position, especially for Alaskans and for the things that we’re trying to accomplish up here for the rest of the U.S., before I can even start addressing that question."

Emphasis added, obvs.
posted by shiu mai baby at 11:47 AM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Alright, the AIP stuff is just priceless. I don't have words. No-drama Obama's having the day of his life.

Also, I agree with DarlingBri, Jessamyn et al about the attempt to get library books banned... am also very, very curious as to what those titles might have been.

As to the predictions that Palin will withdraw--how?? in the middle of the RNC? How can they possibly get another person on the ticket (you know, they have to make the little introductory video for this person and all) in the next two days?

McCain's got himself a tiger by the tail. I love politics but never could have imagined a campaign as entertaining.
posted by torticat at 11:52 AM on September 2, 2008


Wow, a lot of DailyKos readers think that she's gonna withdraw. A surprisingly high number.
posted by lunit at 11:55 AM on September 2, 2008


And her total foreign travel experience consists of a one trip to visit Alaskan National Guard troops in Kuwait and Germany and a second trip to Ireland.

Update: Palin lied about visiting Ireland as part of her foreign policy experience
"She didn't visit Ireland, which is what the McCain-Palin campaign claimed to Politico's Ben Smith on Saturday. She had a short refueling stopover, which means at best her extensive Irish diplomacy amounted to buying a sweater and a beer mug in the Shannon airport."
posted by ericb at 11:56 AM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


The lawyer who conducted the vetting for McCain is on record (yesterday) as saying:

Arthur B. Culvahouse Jr., the lawyer who conducted the review, told The Associated Press in an interview Monday that Palin underwent a "full and complete" examination before McCain chose her. Asked whether everything that came up as a possible red flag during the review already has been made public, Culvahouse said: "I think so. Yeah, I think so. Correct."


So, McCain knew everything that would come out and yet picked her anyway. That seems like an astonishing political misjudgment, or, an act of desperation.

McCain is now faced with the dilemna that hockey coaches have in the last minutes of a close game, say 3 to 2. Pull the goalie, try to swarm the other team's net and tie it up. Ooops, the other team scores on the empty net, so it's 4 to 2. Now what? Put the goalie back in (pick another VP) and try to keep it respectable, or, keep the goalie pulled and risk it going to a historic defeat with the moral victory of "fighting to the end".
posted by Rumple at 11:58 AM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Culvahouse is lying. It was an Ask Jeeves vetting process, nothing more. They've got to lie because otherwise the revelation that they didn't vet her would be a devastating indictment of McCain's judgment.
posted by jayder at 12:06 PM on September 2, 2008


Now what? Put the goalie back in (pick another VP) and try to keep it respectable, or, keep the goalie pulled and risk it going to a historic defeat with the moral victory of "fighting to the end".

This is complicated by the fact that our imaginary hockey coach has huge groups of fans sitting behind the bench, screaming conflicting instructions (Pull the goalie! Don't pull the goalie!) and outright threats (If you don't pull the goalie, you're fired! If you pull the goalie, I'll never come to another one of your games!).
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 12:07 PM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Abstinence from vaginal intercourse being (no one will deny) the only foolproof method of avoiding pregnancy or STDs.

Uh, I thought a primary doctrine of mainstream Christianity is in direct contradiction of that statement, but, I guess I'm not understanding that whole virgin birth thing.
posted by Mental Wimp at 12:07 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Obama has this one in the bag.

We can hope, but as a friend of mine says, the Democrats are masters at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
posted by small_ruminant at 12:07 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin is thrown into media major league -- "The Republican vice presidential nominee discovers that everything’s fair game — even her family."
posted by ericb at 12:09 PM on September 2, 2008


2000?
posted by mdonley at 12:10 PM on September 2, 2008


As to the predictions that Palin will withdraw--how?? in the middle of the RNC? How can they possibly get another person on the ticket (you know, they have to make the little introductory video for this person and all) in the next two days?
I don't think she's going to withdraw. But I think that, if she is, yes, it's going to be in the middle of the RNC. They'll nominate her, and she'll give her I-Didn't-Have-An-Abortion spiel, there will be thunderous applause, and she will say "But the liberals are forcing me from this race with their dastardly attacks on my family, so I must decline the nomination".

There will be shouts of "No, no, no!". McCain will come out and console the feisty, strong, yet tearful lady, and he will raise his hands to calm the crowd. "My friends, we are all sorry to hear this, but we have to respect the governor's decision to defend her family from the liberals!" The crowd goes wild.

"And that's why I'm proud to announce to you my new pick for Vice President - a man who will defend women against the disgusting attacks of the liberals, and make sure that those eighteen million cracks in the glass ceiling shatter it for good!" Palin wipes a tear, smiles broadly, and claps heartily.

From the skies, the deus ex machina red pickup truck is lowered. "My friends! The next! Vice President! Of the United States! Fred! Thompson!"

The crowd explodes in ecstasy. McCain and Palin stand in awe of the pickup and the man inside it, clapping wildly.

A handler pokes Fred, who then works up the energy to raise a hand in a halfhearted wave to the crowd.
posted by Flunkie at 12:12 PM on September 2, 2008 [12 favorites]


Asked whether everything that came up as a possible red flag during the review already has been made public, Culvahouse said: "I think so. Yeah, I think so. Correct."

So the best case is that anything else that comes up, they didn't find? Because this does not seem to be ending.
posted by Artw at 12:12 PM on September 2, 2008


I know the passport rules have been lax between the U.S. and Canada, but please tell me that she's has some sort of relationship with the local Canadian Province government. Please...
posted by garlic at 12:18 PM on September 2, 2008


McCain's campaign manager: "This election is not about issues."
posted by EarBucket at 12:18 PM on September 2, 2008


Sally Quin | Washington Post -- Palin's Pregnancy Problem
"My first reaction was shock. Then anger. John McCain chose a running mate simply because she is a woman and one who appealed to the Republican's conservative evangelical base. Now, with news that Palin's 17-year-old unmarried daughter is pregnant, McCain's pick may not even find support among 'family values' voters.

...McCain's choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical and calculated move. It is a choice made to try to win an election. It is a political gimmick. And it's very high risk. I find it insulting to women, to the Republican party, and to the country.

This is nothing against Palin. From what little we know about her, she seems to be a bright, attractive, impressive person. She certainly has been successful in her 44 years. But is she ready to be president?

And now we learn the 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is pregnant. She and the father of the child plan to marry. This may be a hard one for the Republican conservative family-values crowd to swallow. Of course, this can happen in any family. But it must certainly raise the question among the evangelical base about whether Sarah Palin has been enough of a hands-on mother.

McCain claims he knew about the pregnancy, and was not at all concerned. Why not? Not only do we have a woman with five children, including an infant with special needs, but a woman whose 17-year-old child will need her even more in the coming months. Not to mention the grandchild. This would inevitably be an enormous distraction for a new vice president (or president) in a time of global turmoil. Not only in terms of her job, but from a media standpoint as well.

McCain's cynical choice has created a dilemma for many women. For still-angry Hillary Clinton voters, they will have to decide if they want to vote against their concscience and political interests by voting to elect a Republican woman who's even more conservative than McCain.

Evangelical women also will have to decide if they will vote against their conscience by voting to put the mother of young children in a job outside the home that will demand so much of her time and energy.

Southern Baptist leaders like Richard Land and Al Mohler have praised McCain's choice. But these are the same men who support this statement from the 2000 Baptist Faith & Message:

'A wife is to submit herself graciously to the servant leadership of her husband even as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ. She, being in the image of God as is her husband and thus equal to him, has the God-given responsibility to respect her husband and to serve as his helper in managing the household and nurturing the next generation.'

Palin's lack of experience and her family situation are both valid and vital considerations here, especially when she will be running with a 72-year-old presidential candidate who has suffered four bouts of a deadly cancer." [more]
posted by ericb at 12:20 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Somebody mentioned Alegre's Corner somewhere around 2000 comments ago.

Their reaction to the announcement of Palin (posted on August 31) is probably the most unintentionally ironic thing I've ever read in my life. This is not satire:

The Process of Vetting
John McCain has picked an unknown to run with him, a 44-year old mother of five with Alaskan sensibilities of the drill more for Alaska bent, and the women don't own our bodies, god owns our own bodies bent, which probably tells us all we'll ever find out about her.

There isn't much time before the election, but, one thing we can be fairly sure of is that she doesn't need to be vetted. It's highly unlikely that Sarah Palin is anything other than exactly what she says she is.

She's unlikely to have criminal connections, or have some lover stowed in the back room, caring for her love child. I'd venture to guess she owes no one financial favors, and so she won't have to pledge that she won't make good on any.

I doubt any rich guys have compromised her by seducing her with their connections and wealth. She can't have been planning all along to run for national office, but even so she probably didn't have to think much about keeping her background squeaky clean, or secret. She probably well knows that there is no such thing as a secret anyway.

Why? She's a girl.

It's a guy thing to lust for power and think they can keep secrets and get away with anything. It's a guy thing to keep some other woman on a string while staying married. Guys are good at compartmentalizing, and letting their ambitions blind them to their human shortcomings. Guys often think they can do anything, and get away with it. Girls often think they can't get away with anything, and anyway it'd be too much trouble.

Girls lives are often open books, cause someone knows where they are 24/7. This is double if you're a mom. This is triple if you're a wife too. Men may go out and not let anyone know where they are, wives and moms have to leave numbers and instructions for the babysitter so as to find them in emergencies. Girls rarely go out alone anyway. Girls share with their friends their innermost thoughts and feelings. Girls also know their friends share their secrets with everyone else they know.

Sarah's only possible weak spot would be her husband, and only if he refuses to show his sources of income might that harm her. Gerry's downfall was her Italian businessman husband, she was herself squeaky clean. If Sarah's husband has a love child somewhere, it won't hurt Sarah.

Even when Hillary was running as vetted, the only smeary thing pundits had the nerve to speculate on was Bill, no one thought she had any secrets that could derail her campaign.

So, why aren't all public figures girls? We're sooo vetted, sooo transparent, sooo uncompromised, and some, like Hillary, are sooo much smarter, and work sooo much harder and are just all in all sooo much better? (hint: the sexists want to keep us quiet, barefoot and knocked up)

Sarah may be a smarty too, but we already know about her desire to make us all carry all our fetuses to term and then be solely responsible for them. It's not a secret, she's a know-it-all born-again jerk.
posted by designbot at 12:22 PM on September 2, 2008


Holy shit, people, +2k comments in 3 days. This is going over the top!
posted by mwhybark at 12:23 PM on September 2, 2008


I'm starting to become afraid that Palin will withdraw, and McCain will fix his (now obvious) mistake with a bona fide VP candidate -- or at least someone who remotely resembles a bona fide candidate. Palin staying in the race may be the best thing for Obama right now.

He's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't at this point. Sure, it would be better for Obama if the secessionist, power abusing, library-and-polar-bear hating scandal machine would stay on the ticket, but even if she doesn't? The damage has already been done.

McCain's judgement has been decimated by this choice, all the while he's ruined his arguments against an Obama presidency (experience, patriotism). I'm not saying he can't do damage control, but it would be interesting to see him try.

My mother and stepfather live in Texas. They voted for Bush (twice). My mother has been undecided during the election, while stepfather has staunchly supported McCain.

I called home today. My mother has decided to support Obama, and my stepfather is leaning in that direction. He's a Vietnam war vet, and he supported McCain because he respected his service, and believed that he shared his values. But he's feeling the pinch of the economy, too, and he's got a son in Iraq. He just can't trust someone with such piss poor judgement.

If this is happening in small town Texas, it's got to be happening elsewhere, despite what the smiling Republican talking heads might have us believe. Maybe McCain can fix this with another VP pick, but I think the damage is already done.
posted by jnaps at 12:23 PM on September 2, 2008


I am just in awe that this thread is nearing VioletBluian lengths.
posted by shiu mai baby at 12:25 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Palin lied about visiting Ireland...

Oh sweet Jesus.

I'm finally catching on that this has all been some kind of strange joke.
posted by rokusan at 12:26 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Update: Palin lied about visiting Ireland as part of her foreign policy experience

It just keeps on giving! So okay - we're all distracted with these numerous ridiculosities of Sarah Palin. So while we're all turned in her direction, pointing and laughing at her job resume, repeated lying and book banning, they must be somewhere slipping something by. This is bordering on outright stupidity.
posted by cashman at 12:28 PM on September 2, 2008


Palin's Church May Have Shaped Controversial Worldview.
posted by ericb at 12:29 PM on September 2, 2008


Oh, and whoever the heck that was upthread looking forward to the Daily Show tonight, I thank you for reminding me! I might be wrong here, but they haven't aired a new one since before the announcement, am I correct? Friday off, Monday a holiday....
posted by mwhybark at 12:29 PM on September 2, 2008


As one who would not like to see Republican hegemony continued, I couldn't be more delighted that the FSM and McCain have teamed up to hand them a steaming pile of fresh public relations manure right now. Gustav is the starkest and most unavoidable reminder of the scandalous federal response to Katrina and one that not even James Carville could have cooked up. Then Sarah Palin gets picked and the bad news for Republicans just fills the airwaves, pages, and tubes of the media. [Sits back, munches popcorn]
posted by Mental Wimp at 12:31 PM on September 2, 2008


I doubt any rich guys have compromised her by seducing her with their connections and wealth. She can't have been planning all along to run for national office, but even so she probably didn't have to think much about keeping her background squeaky clean, or secret. She probably well knows that there is no such thing as a secret anyway.

Why? She's a girl.


Blah, blah, blah, gender stereotype, gender stereotype, gender stereotype. I'm so glad to know that we wimmin folk ain't worth the vettin' 'cause we keep everthin' all out in the open and such.

How does such a facile observation that is made of nothing but sweeping generalizations contribute to the conversation?
posted by shiu mai baby at 12:32 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


How does such a facile observation that is made of nothing but sweeping generalizations contribute to the conversation?
Don't you worry your pretty little head about that.
posted by Flunkie at 12:36 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


You know what I really think? Deep, deep down in my guts?

I think God has a really, really big sense of humor. And He is in the process of proving it.
posted by konolia at 12:38 PM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Palin's Church May Have Shaped Controversial Worldview.


Oh wow. Is this gift that keeps giving going to innoculate Barack against Jeremiah Wright smears too? Because I know what gets said in the kind of church Palin attends, and if there is any videotape it's going to be juicy.
posted by fourcheesemac at 12:39 PM on September 2, 2008


Documents detail Palin's time as governor.

2006 Democratic oppo research document about Palin [PDF].
posted by ericb at 12:41 PM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Konolia, based on the fact that James Dobson made a public call for all Christians to pray for rain on the day of Obama's acceptance speech (which was rain-free), only to have the biggest hurricane of the season so far make landfall on the first day of the RNC?

I think you're right on the money.
posted by shiu mai baby at 12:41 PM on September 2, 2008 [24 favorites]


I think God has a really, really big sense of humor. And He is in the process of proving it.

Gods with senses of humor are generally pretty bad news for mortals. The last thing I need is a conception of the universe that puts Andy Kaufman's hands on the wheel.
posted by cortex at 12:41 PM on September 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


Earbucket's link to McCain's campaign advisor's comments is astounding:

"This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates."

Davis generally dismissed the controversies surrounding McCain's vice presidential pick -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin -- as a media creation but did acknowledge that her acceptance speech, which seems likely to come tomorrow, is critically important to defining who she is to the American public.

As for the speech itself, Davis said a generic, "masculine" [WTF????] speech was being prepared before the pick was made and, now that Palin is the choice, she is adapting the speech to her own needs and personality.


Davis did admit, however, the challenges of running for president as a Republican in this political atmosphere.

"We are in the worst Republican environment since Nixon in 1972," said Davis. "We take that seriously. We get the joke."


Because you support the worst President since Nixon, who was the worst president since, um, forever. "we take that seriously - we get the joke". Talk about cognitive dissonance.
posted by Rumple at 12:44 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


> Oh, and whoever the heck that was upthread looking forward to the Daily Show tonight, I thank you for reminding me! I might be wrong here, but they haven't aired a new one since before the announcement, am I correct? Friday off, Monday a holiday....

They had a special friday show cover it, this is their reaction to Palin so far

I have no idea what tonight's material is going to be.
posted by mrzarquon at 12:46 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I know what gets said in the kind of church Palin attends, and if there is any videotape it's going to be juicy.

Well ... there's this: "A review of recorded sermons [audio/video archive] by Ed Kalnins, the senior pastor of Wasilla Assembly of God since 1999, offers a provocative and, for some, eyebrow-raising sketch of Palin's longtime spiritual home.

...Pastor Kalnins has also preached that critics of President Bush will be banished to hell; questioned whether people who voted for Sen. John Kerry in 2004 would be accepted to heaven; charged that the 9/11 terrorist attacks and war in Iraq were part of a war 'contending for your faith;' and said that Jesus 'operated from that position of war mode.'

...Kalnins has preached that the 9/11 attacks and the invasion of Iraq were part of a 'world war' over the Christian faith, one in which Jesus Christ had called upon believers to be willing to sacrifice their lives.

...He also claims to have received direct 'words of knowledge' from God, providing him information about past events in other people's lives."

There's much, much more ... and I suspect the Obama oppo team is watching each and every video from the curch's server.
posted by ericb at 12:47 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


From ericb's link above

"Pastor Kalnins has also preached that critics of President Bush will be banished to hell; questioned whether people who voted for Sen. John Kerry in 2004 would be accepted to heaven; charged that the 9/11 terrorist attacks and war in Iraq were part of a war "contending for your faith;" and said that Jesus "operated from that position of war mode."

Also, there is a review of Kalnins' sermons posted here.

Rev Kalnins is about to become famous, and not in a good way. Among other things, this throws a nice light on something we all knew happened in 2000 and 2004 -- electioneering from the pulpit in thousands of evangelical churches, and at least a few Catholic ones. That's against the law, and in principle should cost a church its tax exemption. Let's see the FEC and the DoJ investigate this, for once?

Here are konolia's "real Americans" -- busily claiming their theocratic dominion, damning to hell those they disagree with, and plotting their minority government takeover (because they are a distinct minority of Americans, these evangelical freaks) from inside the sanctuary of their houses of worship.

One thing about this whole scandal is the delicious hoist-by-their-own-petards schadenfreude yumminess of it all. Every bit of rumor-spreading, fear-mongering, guilt-by-association slander that the right heaped on Obama in their fruitless attempt to paint him as a stranger to American values is now going to come home to roost.

Oh, jeez, I am loving this. A great day for America. Thank you Senator McCain, and thank you Governor Palin. This election is all over but the voting.
posted by fourcheesemac at 12:47 PM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Ha, ericb -- great minds think alike.

Yes, there's even more very juicy stuff there. LOL.
posted by fourcheesemac at 12:49 PM on September 2, 2008


To top it off, the church's streaming server has collapsed. I give it minutes before they hide this stuff and take it offline. Anyone out there who can get a connection and has a stream recorder could probably make some money off this moment.

This means hundreds or even thousands of people are headed over to hear Sarah's crazy pastor.

Yahoo!
posted by fourcheesemac at 12:51 PM on September 2, 2008


McCain's campaign manager: "This election is not about issues."

"This election is not about issues," said Davis. "This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates."

Here's what I'm taking away:
By choosing a person who is unqualified to be President of The United States as his VP, McCain has demonstrated terrible judgement and is exhibiting poor leadership.

If he can't even vett his VP choice properly, how is he expected to run a nation?
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 12:53 PM on September 2, 2008


Server collapse... sure. And it won't come back online for about 70 days.

I hope somebody out there was busy copying all those files, because otherwise they're gone.
posted by clever sheep at 12:53 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


I think God has a really, really big sense of humor. And He is in the process of proving it.
I'm having a really really hard time understanding what this means.
posted by dirtdirt at 12:53 PM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


Oh, and whoever the heck that was upthread looking forward to the Daily Show tonight, I thank you for reminding me! I might be wrong here, but they haven't aired a new one since before the announcement, am I correct? Friday off, Monday a holiday....
posted by mwhybark at 3:29 PM on September 2 [+] [!]


They did a Tuesday to Friday schedule last week, so that they could have a day to write about the day before. They've already responded to the choice of Palin by having her fellow "Vagina-American" Samantha Bee comment. - on preview - see linked sketch above

I don't know what the schedule is this week, but they may be doing another Tuesday to Friday.
posted by jb at 12:56 PM on September 2, 2008


Wasila Assembly of God Church has taken its server offline. Hold on to your hats!

By the way, the link I posted above was to the WAG site, not a review of the sermons. That was ericb's post.
posted by fourcheesemac at 12:56 PM on September 2, 2008


Todd Palin confirmed to have been registered member of Alaskan secessionist party through 2002

After seven years, Palin changed his affiliation to "undeclared" shortly before his wife's first statewide election.
posted by XQUZYPHYR at 12:57 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I am reminded of a couple months back, when Senator McCain was asked how he was going to choose his Vice Presidential running mate.

"Well, basically, it's a google," he said.

I guess he wasn't kidding. Though it looks like he probably didn't get past the first couple of hits.
posted by Flunkie at 1:02 PM on September 2, 2008


...pastor...

Heh. Like that stuff counts if you're white.
posted by Artw at 1:06 PM on September 2, 2008


Clinton backers move toward Obama.

A new Gallup poll out today says that the percentage of Clinton loyalists planning to vote for Obama in November jumped from 70 percent before last week's convention to 81 percent after, and the percentage saying they are certain to back Obama increased from 47 percent to 65 percent.
posted by cashman at 1:10 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


A secessionist? Holy Shit, but the 21st century is just all kinds of weird. I bet McCain could still win and if he does I'm moving to the asteriod belt, that's a promise!
posted by Divine_Wino at 1:12 PM on September 2, 2008


I'm as delighted watching this apparent implosion of her candidacy as any socialist latte drinker, but I agree that the seemingly never-ending stream of dirt on Bristol Palin is unhelpful. For a start, the "teenage drinking" photos that have been doing the rounds don't appear to be her, but are in fact of her boyfriend's/fiancé's sister, Sadie/Mercedes.

The Alegre's corner thing about vetting is unbelievably funny... I think I actually feel sorry for Sarah Palin now. Oh my...

And now Todd Palin's been confirmed as registered for AIP until 2002! HAHA! This is going to be good (assuming the MSM pick it up...).

seriously, there's not even the slightest need to go in for dirty tricks and smears on her kids... they're digging their own graves here.
posted by knapah at 1:16 PM on September 2, 2008


Stop this shit.

Seconded. Leave the kids alone.
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 1:16 PM on September 2, 2008


Todd Palin confirmed to have been registered member of Alaskan secessionist party through 2002

The Republican Candidate for Vice President's husband wanted to secede from the Union. Talk about hating America!
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 1:18 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


We can wreck two trains right into each other by positing that her epic water-broke journey was to ensure that their are no questions about her son's Alaskan citizenship after the secession.
posted by TheOnlyCoolTim at 1:23 PM on September 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


Even Rupert Murdoch is throwing in the towel, it seems.

Rupert Murdoch helped broker a "tentative truce" between Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and key News Corporation lieutenant Roger Ailes, the boss of Fox News Channel, earlier this year, according to the media mogul's biographer.

Murdoch, the News Corp chairman and chief executive, was forced to court Obama after the rising star of US politics rebuffed his initial approaches, it is believed because of what he saw as the derogatory coverage of him and his wife, Michelle, on Fox News, according to Michael Wolff.


...

"Fox has been his [Murdoch's] alter ego. For a long time he was in love with the Fox chief, Roger Ailes, because he was even more Murdoch than Murdoch. And yet now the embarrassment can't be missed - he mumbles even more than usual when called on to justify it; he barely pretends to hide the way he feels about [Fox presenter] Bill O'Reilly.

"And while it is not possible that he would give Fox up - because the money is the money; success trumps all - in the larger sense of who he is, he seems to want to hedge his bets."

posted by Rumple at 1:26 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


The Republican Candidate for Vice President's husband wanted to secede from the Union.

I can't wait to see the New Yorker cover next week.
posted by scody at 1:28 PM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


We can wreck two trains right into each other by positing that her epic water-broke journey was to ensure that their are no questions about her son's Alaskan citizenship after the secession.

I WANT TO BELIEVE
posted by cortex at 1:30 PM on September 2, 2008


No, what I AM saying is that she and her husband WERE the average American... One thing this woman will never do is talk down to America.

She IS America.

--posted by konolia

Is that why Todd Palin wanted to secede?
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 1:32 PM on September 2, 2008 [12 favorites]


The RNC Tuesday schedule is back online - tonight features both Lieberman and Thompson.
posted by 8dot3 at 1:35 PM on September 2, 2008


after the secession.

Well, at least she would have had foreign policy experience then, in dealing with America. At least for the day or two while troops were on the way there to beat her down like she stole somethin.
posted by cashman at 1:35 PM on September 2, 2008


Wasila Assembly of God Church has taken its server offline.

displaying your woeful lack of understanding of how the internet works adds nothing to the discussion.
posted by quonsar at 1:36 PM on September 2, 2008


Just heard Wolf Blitzer say that McCain pulled his upcoming interview with Larry King live in protest of the over the top treatment of Tucker Bounds in the Campbell Brown interview. Astounding.
posted by madamjujujive at 1:40 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


McCain defends Palin selection process...

McCain, in Cleveland, said he was excited about Alaska Gov. Palin and predicted a warm welcome for her from Republican delegates when she addressed the convention on Wednesday.

"America's excited and they're going to be even more excited once they see her tomorrow night," he told reporters. "I'm very, very proud of the impression that she's made on all of America and I'm looking forward to serving with her."

...

"My vetting process was completely thorough and I'm grateful for the results," McCain told reporters in Philadelphia after a visit with firefighters.

....

McCain adviser Carly Fiorina said she was appalled and accused him of sexism, a charge the Obama camp had faced during Democrat Hillary Clinton's primary battle against him.

"The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a mayor and governor than Barack Obama has made in his life," Fiorina said.

"Because of Hillary Clinton's historic run for the presidency and the treatment she received, American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms. They will not tolerate sexist treatment of Gov. Palin," Fiorina said.
posted by birdherder at 1:44 PM on September 2, 2008


If you are a seccessionist, it's not that you HATE America, it's that you don't want to be BE an American, you want to be something else.

The VP's family did not want to be part of America. Forget about feeling pride, etc., they didn't want to be part of the country at all.
posted by cell divide at 1:44 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Wow. I just got some terrible news. Terrible.

Okay. I have to back track. See I was elected president of my Seattle Condo board in May of 08. God what a hassle. But so far I've overseen a law suit, the tiling of our basement, the repair of back lot sewer drains and a window well. Also involved negotiating with one our owners, who is a Chinese National and only lives here part time, was quite difficult and time consuming but resulted in the recovery of $8000 dollars in back assessments.

Well, anyways. The terrible news. I just got a call from Minnesota. Looks like I'm slated to be next in line for Republican Vice President (right behind that guy who runs the Piroshki place down the street). I was told this was due to my "common man" street cred, penchant for angry tirades, executive and foreign policy experience, and Seattle's proximity to both Russia and China.

Damn.
posted by tkchrist at 1:46 PM on September 2, 2008 [11 favorites]


I originally thought birdhearder's quotes meant that she was accusing McCain of sexism! Not that I had a super-high opinion of her before, but that just seems needlessly stupid.
posted by cell divide at 1:48 PM on September 2, 2008


CNN's Campbell Brown just obliterates McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds who simply refuses to answer, is unable to answer, the simple question as to what foreign policy experience Palin has.

On CNN Wolf Blitzer just anounced that John McCain has cancelled tonight's originally scheduled interview with Larry King because he and his camp are upset over Campbell Brown's interview yesterday with Tucker Bounds.
posted by ericb at 1:49 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Mmm... he's not really following current events is he? Hillary's supporters pretty much told him and Palin to go fuck themselves.
posted by Artw at 1:50 PM on September 2, 2008


Or what madamjujujive said!
posted by ericb at 1:50 PM on September 2, 2008


I'm a little in shock at the Murdoch thing... maybe he's getting ready to drop dead or something?
posted by Artw at 1:50 PM on September 2, 2008


"My vetting process was completely thorough and I'm grateful for the results," McCain told reporters in Philadelphia after a visit with firefighters."

I literally just read that as:

"...McCain told Philadephia after a fistfight with reporters."

I have to stop reading this shit, I'm starting to go as batty as the GOP!
posted by tristeza at 1:51 PM on September 2, 2008


Just heard Wolf Blitzer say that McCain pulled his upcoming interview with Larry King live in protest of the over the top treatment of Tucker Bounds in the Campbell Brown interview .

So the decorated war hero is gonna cut and run?
posted by Brandon Blatcher at 1:51 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


And journalists acting vaguely tough in interviews... WTF is happening to the world?
posted by Artw at 1:52 PM on September 2, 2008


I'm really looking forward to Palin breaking cover and giving an interview. They can't hide her forever. or can they?

tkchrist --- sorry, but your daughter's pregnant with Reverend Wright's baby.
posted by Rumple at 1:54 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Just heard Wolf Blitzer say that McCain pulled his upcoming interview with Larry King live in protest of the embarrassment of Tucker Bounds in the Campbell Brown interview. Astounding.

First off, Tucker was the one who was over the top in how much evasion there was in that interview. So there was no over the top treatment of him. Secondly:


McCain pouts over spokesperson getting served
Tue Sep 2, 2008 4:51pm EDT

Email | Print |Share | Reprints | Single Page | Recommend (75)

By Priscilla Lundcaster

ST. PAUL, Minnesota (Reuters) - Republican John McCain rallied behind his vice presidential pick Sarah Palin on Tuesday, announcing he would take his ball and go home.

His comments came as pitcher Larry King prepared to face him later that evening. The Softball Association of America had no comment.

McCain, in Cleveland, said he was protesting how his spokesperson was eviscerated when he appeared on CNN in a video that was rapidly distributed across the internet. The Arizona senator's 96-year-old mother was interviewed from her porch ahead of McCain's arrival. "I'll cheer him up with a cherry pie and tell him he has to go back out there and face Larry," she said.

It was unclear at press time whose bat it was, or if anybody knew a kid down the street who had another ball.


UPDATED: This version corrects an earlier version of the story that incorrectly substituted "a kick in the pants" for cherry pie.

posted by cashman at 2:00 PM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


TIA doesn't, but coral cache seems to have the church's page. I don't have rstp set up on this box, can someone check it?
posted by a robot made out of meat at 2:01 PM on September 2, 2008


tkchrist --- sorry, but your daughter's pregnant with Reverend Wright's baby.

So that's where that weird glow and scary Latin choral music has been coming from. That might explain the dobermans with the glowing red eyes, too.
posted by tkchrist at 2:02 PM on September 2, 2008


It’s all for you, tkchrist Jr.!

/jumps from top of monster thread.
posted by Artw at 2:06 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


/lands at current bottom of thread.

Ow.
posted by Artw at 2:07 PM on September 2, 2008


(I think I saw Xeni Jardin up there!)
posted by Artw at 2:08 PM on September 2, 2008


if you disable MeFi navigator, this page renders much quicker
posted by Rumple at 2:09 PM on September 2, 2008


sveskemus writes "What's with all these people out there who apparently think that Obama's a socialist? Do they think he's lying about his proposed policies or do they think what he's saying and doing is what a socialist says and does? I truly don't get it."

They don't know what socialist means. The same type of person who thinks Canadians are communists.

ericb writes "Update: Palin lied about visiting Ireland as part of her foreign policy experience'She didn't visit Ireland, which is what the McCain-Palin campaign claimed to Politico's Ben Smith on Saturday. She had a short refueling stopover, which means at best her extensive Irish diplomacy amounted to buying a sweater and a beer mug in the Shannon airport.'"

Would it be too cliche to say you can't make this stuff up 'cause no one would believe it?

mrzarquon writes "They had a special friday show cover it, this is their reaction to Palin so far"

Which isn't available in Canada even from CTV damn it. *warms up BT*
posted by Mitheral at 2:12 PM on September 2, 2008


On CNN Wolf Blitzer just anounced that John McCain has cancelled tonight's originally scheduled interview with Larry King because he and his camp are upset over Campbell Brown's interview yesterday with Tucker Bounds.

WHINER.

Awwww, whassamatta John? Pretty, smiling GIRL ANCHOR Campbell Brown made one of your buddies cry on the playground without a whole lot of effort? God, what an ass.

Oh yeah, I was horribly tortured by the Vietnamese but Campbell freaking Brown is scary? (Admittedly, Larry King is scary all on his own, in a different way, so pinning your fears of him on Brown is unfair, McCain)

And at the risk of getting the feminist contingent all het up over the verbs employed after this colon: Palin better grow a [figurative] pair before the VP debates, because if Biden smacks her down like Campbell Brown and she whines as bad as her ticket-mate McCain, it's going to make all top-level women look bad for a while.
posted by bitter-girl.com at 2:12 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Sarah Palin is Your New Segway
posted by Rumple at 2:15 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Here's a clip of Wolf Blitzer announcing the cancellation of McCain's interview.
posted by ericb at 2:15 PM on September 2, 2008


What? Larry King is like the king of softball pandering bullshit.
posted by Artw at 2:16 PM on September 2, 2008


Just heard Wolf Blitzer say that McCain pulled his upcoming interview with Larry King live in protest of the over the top treatment of Tucker Bounds in the Campbell Brown interview. Astounding.

Yeah. That's why he doesn't want to go on TV and answer questions like:

"What the hell were you thinking?"

"Are you senile?"

"Are you guys trying to lose?"

"Seriously, do you have Alzheimers?"

It's because he's offended by the way one of his flunkies was handled. That's the ticket.
posted by EarBucket at 2:17 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


So now that he's canceled that interview, CNN and friends will run the Campbell/Tucker cluster over and over again? Good move, John. GTKOG indeed!
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 2:19 PM on September 2, 2008


Photos of Bristol Palin partying with Captain Morgan and friends.

Before we get all upset about "liberals" posting this stuff, check out the bottom of second link:
I'm not sure how we survive this as a party. The one thing I do know is this doesn't help us beat Obama in the fall, and all joking aside, though Alaskan Trailer Trash living in the VPs house in Washington isn't a good thing, it's MUCH MUCH better than Obama being elected.
(Obviously Perez Hilton (the first link) isn't a republican, but still -- not everyone talking about this is doing so because they want to sink her chances, but because they're genuinely curious about what's going on. it's hardly surprising that people would be curious, given how popular tabloid style journalism is in this country)

Also: whoa. No wonder Alaskans "like" her, I'd like someone handing out big fat checks for nothing. Paging Dire Straits! We've got a theme song job for you over here...- bitter-girl.com

Hah, no kidding. Palin plays the "hardcore republican" but in terms of policy she's actually a socialist Taxing big oil to give money to the people. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but it's a bit hypocritical for right-wingers to love Palin while calling Obama a socialist.

It will be interesting to see how the media plays up Palin's church stuff, If there's one thing the MSM doesn't like it's the appearance of favoritism. But there's just so much here that you can't cover it all, and by the time you finish off the big stuff, the smaller stuff is just old news.
posted by delmoi at 2:21 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


LARRY KING: We're here with Republican presidential candidate John McCain for the whole hour... So John, there's been a lot of controversy about this lately, tell me where in Scottsdale can I get a good steak?

JOHN MCCAIN: Larry, I'm glad you asked that. There's a lot of controversy and talking on the intenets about this. My favorite isn't in Scottsdale, but in Phoenix at the Durant's. When I was locked in that box for five and a half years, I kept going by thinking about America and a good steak. Like the kind they cook up at Durant's.
posted by birdherder at 2:27 PM on September 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


Holy hopscotching shit, this thread is so great, each new revelation so utterly delicious in its effortless self-satire, that I'm almost sorry I have to go get ready for the Paul Weller concert tonight.

Almost.

(*wishes she had a MODS FOR OBAMA button to wear*)
posted by scody at 2:28 PM on September 2, 2008


So that's where that weird glow and scary Latin choral music has been coming from. That might explain the dobermans with the glowing red eyes, too.

I hate to go public with this, but I'm nearly positive that the kid is NOT tkchrist's grandchild. the sad truth of the matter is that tkchrist has been concealing his pregnancy from the public for months or even years, solely via the careful discipline of his legendary six-pack.
posted by mwhybark at 2:29 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Okay, I am horrible at reading people. But do the spokespeople for the McCain campaign and the Republican Party seem to be truly sincere and believable? I am watching the news and gosh, golly they are really working hard for the candidate.

I am trying to get my head out of the media echo chamber and trying to get substance to digest. I have read through this thread and the conservative voices including Konolia (who I truly respect for her convictions and willingness to speak) have not been heard in the last few hundred postings and it is now pretty anti-McCain. Can we get some more Mefi conservative voices? I really want to understand the Palin pick and remove the chaff from the substance.
posted by jadepearl at 2:30 PM on September 2, 2008


Beneath the chaff.... THERE IS NOTHING!
posted by Artw at 2:36 PM on September 2, 2008


CBS News is reporting Palin has cancelled her appearance at the Republican convention tonight.

Let me be the first to admit I may have been wrong about McCain not changing horses in mid-stream.
posted by orthogonality at 2:40 PM on September 2, 2008


I did watch the Campbell Brown-Tucker Bounds argument live last night, and the shocking thing wasn't Bounds' inability to answer the question, it was that Campbell Brown was actually doing her job.

It was like Jeremy Paxman discovered the tunnel that led into her head, only was disappointed to find it wasn't John Malkovich.
posted by dw at 2:41 PM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


CNN reported that, prior to McCain's decision, Palin was vetted in the customary manner, and, as a result, that the pregnancy and trooper-gate (the latter hardly a secret in the first place) came to light. They also reported that Palin just came right out and told McCain about the pregnancy, independent of any inquiries. Again, prior to the decision. So this was not a botched vetting process. McCain knew about all the skeletons and chose her anyway.

You're not going to catch me voting for the big M or Ms. Palin because keeping 160,000 troops in Iraq is worse than keeping 30,000. And I do not ascribe to any of the candidates altruistic or noble intentions. But I do agree that personal shit shouldn't factor into deciding who's going to sit in the White House and am tempted to admire a guy who, under these circumstances, says "fuck it. I'm doing it."

Which is not to say that I'll shed a tear if the Palin thing slam dunks Senator John. And I still can't wait to hear the behind-the-scenes account of how and why this decision was made. Should make for some interesting reading.
posted by Clay201 at 2:46 PM on September 2, 2008


They also reported that Palin just came right out and told McCain about the pregnancy, independent of any inquiries.

Did they ask her if she had ever been a member of a political party that advocated secession?
posted by drezdn at 2:49 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


CNN reported that, prior to McCain's decision, Palin was vetted in the customary manner, and, as a result, that the pregnancy and trooper-gate (the latter hardly a secret in the first place) came to light. They also reported that Palin just came right out and told McCain about the pregnancy, independent of any inquiries. Again, prior to the decision. So this was not a botched vetting process. McCain knew about all the skeletons and chose her anyway.

I don't buy it. There are two many inconsistencies in their story of when McCain knew what, too many people in Alaska who would have been interviewed by a vetting team who claim no one ever talked to them, and too many badly-prepared surrogates who have no idea how to deal with the shitstorm flying at them. Of course they're going to claim they vetted her. It's because not having vetted her makes them look like grade-A world-class morons, and they know it.

I'm sure they did some very basic vetting. But it certainly doesn't appear that they did anything resembling due diligence on her.
posted by EarBucket at 2:51 PM on September 2, 2008


I hate to go public with this, but I'm nearly positive that the kid is NOT tkchrist's grandchild. the sad truth of the matter is that tkchrist has been concealing his pregnancy from the public for months or even years, solely via the careful discipline of his legendary six-pack.

WHYBARK! I knew when we were playing blind-folded baby diapering at my shower and you insisted on us using YOU rather than baby doll you were a man not apt to keep secrets... that and your insistence that we choose "Atilla" as our baby name.
posted by tkchrist at 2:52 PM on September 2, 2008


I mean, this is so counter-productive. All we’re doing is showing the American people — who are to a one a nation of “fuckin’ redneck” hockey playing snowmobile racers given to leaping headlong into unprotected sex at the earliest age possible so that they might spend their government checks shooting wolves from airplanes and building wonderful bridges hither and yon with their enormous families in tow — that we’re out of touch with their concerns.
(that's kind of an edgy site, those of you complaining about civility won't like the rest of what's written there, but I found that paragraph pretty funny)
posted by delmoi at 2:53 PM on September 2, 2008


Boyfriend heads to convention
"Bristol Palin's boyfriend plans to join the family of the Republican vice presidential candidate at the convention in Minnesota.

Levi Johnston's mother said her 18-year-old son left Alaska on Tuesday morning to join the Palin family in St. Paul.

Sherry Johnston also said there has been no pressure put on her son to marry Bristol Palin, the pregnant daughter of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin."
posted by ericb at 2:54 PM on September 2, 2008


Did they ask her if she had ever been a member of a political party that advocated secession?

Paf. Canada has 48 MPs sitting in Parliment that form a part where secession is one of their primary platforms. A little secession talk never hurt anybody outside of Russian client-states.
posted by GuyZero at 2:55 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


jadepearl: Can we get some more Mefi conservative voices? I really want to understand the Palin pick and remove the chaff from the substance.

I'm not a conservative, but a roundup of the more conservative articles linked at realclearpolitics.com might be helpful.

The Case Against the Case Against Palin ("Watching Palin operate over the past few years has been like witnessing a dramatic reading of All the King’s Men.[...] Sooner or later, the Obama camp will realize that the beauty pageant queen is an enormously talented populist in a year that is ripe for populism. For their own sake, it had better be sooner.")

Team McCain Hits Back on Palin, Vetting ("The [NYT] story, my campaign source told me, is 'materially false.' Gov. Palin, the strategist said, was subjected to a 'complete vet.' [...] 'The only thing the campaign did not look at was the microfilm of the local newspaper, because it was impossible to look at the microfilm without revealing the search process,' the strategist said. 'We made a calculation that we would be able to get all the information from the Anchorage newspaper, that it was unlikely that there would be items in the local papers that were problematic that didn’t make it to the Anchorage paper.' ")

McCain Campaign: Palin a Republican Since 1982 ("Sarah Palin never belonged to the AIP. That’s the bottom line.")

Finally, there's Sarah Palin: Deeply Threatening to the Left? ("Ridiculing McCain’s VP pick for her commitment to family, poking fun at her hobbies and pushing smear about her kids will only bite back. [...] It makes the lefties look desperate, unstable, paranoid and downright mean. And it will hurt the Democratic brand if it continues.")
posted by Prospero at 2:56 PM on September 2, 2008


Palin a no-show at anti-abortion event.

In the "She's not speaking tonight" video link up there they said she was attending this, but now she didn't. Huh.
posted by dirtdirt at 2:56 PM on September 2, 2008


Well, it was then I first began to have concerns about your suitability as a running mate for Mr. McCain, Todd. The superabundance of rubberwear, the dog collars... I just put it down to dog training and moved on, but events are forcing my hand.

My best to Mrs. tkchrist, as ever.
posted by mwhybark at 3:11 PM on September 2, 2008


My best to Mrs. tkchrist, as ever.
And to you, sir.
posted by tkchrist at 3:16 PM on September 2, 2008


Off of Prospero's "Palin a Republican" link is a PDF that appears to include copies of many of her voter registration forms.
posted by XMLicious at 3:19 PM on September 2, 2008


Have any of the rest of you heard this? My husband came home and told me Obama's not gonna be spending any more campaign money in NC.

That doesn't make any sense to me-any of you Obama people know what's going on?


(And in an ongoing report here on the ground, McCain signs are going like crazy -people call my house looking for them-and people still are excited-incredibly excited-about Palin. )
posted by konolia at 3:19 PM on September 2, 2008


Her cancellation of the anti-abortion appearance was so she could work on her speech for the convention, according to McCain sources quoted in that story, so I wouldn't assume she's about to be pushed out. Unless she is.
posted by maudlin at 3:21 PM on September 2, 2008


The sad thing I see here is this: in this election, we have lauded the virtues of the "ordinary American" - all of the major candidates have some incarnation of normalcy - of tragedy, even - in their message (childhood poverty, death, war, hard work with little/no payoff) - and then, in one fell swoop, we expose the rot of their myths, by exposing an honest-to-God (and especially fortunate) member of that "ordinary class" to a huge amount of media scrutiny and blowing the myth of the inherent goodness of "hockey moms" and "single parents" and "hard-working families" and "takes Amtrak home every night" and all the rest of it out of the water. This hurts all the candidates.

Consider the "hopeless" presidential candidates we've seen over the last few years - consider Dennis Kuchinich. Why does he run, to be mocked by half the country? Because he believes, truly, that he has a chance. Not to win the whole thing. But to make a difference, to shape the debate. Seeing Kucinich in a televised debate was amazing, because everyone knew that after the first few primaries, he was dead meat. But the man isn't interested in being a megalomaniac, or owning six Ferraris some lobbyist pays for, or being respected by the media or anyone else in the halls of the powerful. He does his work in the House - a big body it's probably very easy to lose your way in - for the people of Cleveland, and for the rest of us, because he...wants...to. Because he likes helping ordinary folks. That's the American dream: to aspire to serve, and to do so so honorably that you're re-elected time and time again by the people who want you there. And this is a guy who started out on his city council at the age of 23, one of seven kids in a family that moved 21 times when he was growing up. I don't know the guy personally; he may very well have some skeletons in his closet.

The very essence of what we are raised to believe as citizens - that we are a meritocracy, that anyone can make it - has been severely tested this election cycle, in spite of the fact that we have some great candidates all the way down the ticket from both major parties. And those down-ticket votes really matter - so much in our society is determined in our communities, counties, and states. This election is being seen as a generational shift - huge turnout, never so much involvement, a universe of new media driving debate and speaking truth to power and its lying spokespeople.

And we've gone and made it a circus over this relatively normal person full of problems and flaws. The citizenry is confused; the media is acting like they've never seen any political figure with a speck of tarnish on them; the left is on the offense, foolishly; the right is hiding behind Flag and Freedom and F-16s.

We might as well just permanently nail the reins of power to the doors of the Capitol building, because I don't see either party handing any level of responsibility, trust, or management outside the Beltway for some time to come. Even if McCain wins, I don't see either party risking involving anyone other than perfectly-vetted insiders from now on, regardless of their merits or credentials. There will always be Barack Obamas and Bobby Jindals, Brian Schweitzers and Janet Napolitanos. But will they be at the head of the table anytime soon? I doubt it.
posted by mdonley at 3:22 PM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Have any of the rest of you heard this? My husband came home and told me Obama's not gonna be spending any more campaign money in NC.

Not true, as far as I know. I think they've cut the TV ads for the moment, but the campaign's real focus here is on the ground game. We've got a ton of paid organizers working in the state. Where'd your husband hear that?
posted by EarBucket at 3:24 PM on September 2, 2008


Scratch that--he's just made a TV ad buy in NC. Yeah, we're very much in play here.
posted by EarBucket at 3:27 PM on September 2, 2008


Seems like she hasn't shown her face since Saturday. Are they trying to figure out how to respond to all this, or wait until it all blows over? Or are they planning to dump her?

But man, compare the republican "convention" to the democratic one just last week, an enormous spectacle, compelling narrative (Will the party unify? Will Bill Clinton give an endorsement? Will Barack's speech go well?) and it's capped off with a speech in front of 80k people.

Now the republicans, you've got a parade of dumbass operatives spouting obvious lies (she was fully vetted! She's got lots of executive experience) so absolutely transparent that even hardened newsbots can't hide their disbelief. The entire convention coverage seems to be nothing more then gossip and scandal involving their new VP.

How is that going to look to the average voter at home? Can you picture John McCain getting a "bounce" out of this?
posted by delmoi at 3:30 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


Clearly going for the pity vote.

Start crying, old man.
posted by Artw at 3:36 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Now the republicans, you've got a parade of dumbass operatives spouting obvious lies...

I guess you go with what's worked for you before.
posted by mazola at 3:37 PM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


And we've gone and made it a circus over this relatively normal person full of problems and flaws.

Is it relatively normal ...

-- for a Governor to abuse her power by firing a state employee because he refused to fire a trooper that she wanted punished due to a bitter custody battle?

-- for an elected official in a country founded on principles of free expression to inquire at the library --- as soon as she is elected mayor --- about the procedure for banning books?

This kind of stuff matters. This is fair game.

When a VP candidate has a comparatively sparse record on which we can judge her, yes, we're going to zero in on that gross abuse of power that is currently the subject of a legislative investigation that even members of her own party supported. Yes, we will make a "circus" of it, because the future of the country is at stake.

It's as though some people want to squelch debate about Palin because it's going to mess up the Oxygen Network feel-good movie script that they think this story should be.
posted by jayder at 3:37 PM on September 2, 2008 [6 favorites]


This kind of stuff matters. This is fair game.

It's fair game, but it's a losing proposition for most voters. They need to talk about the issues, about Iraq, the Economy, and Healthcare. All the rest of it just feeds into what the Republicans want.
posted by cell divide at 3:41 PM on September 2, 2008


It's not about the issues, according to McCain.
posted by Artw at 3:45 PM on September 2, 2008


My husband came home and told me Obama's not gonna be spending any more campaign money in NC.

Your husband is a victim of bad information.
Who told him this lie?
posted by Fuzzy Monster at 3:45 PM on September 2, 2008


The upcoming cover of Us Weekly: "John McCain's Vice President, Sarah Palin. Babies, Lies, and Scandal."

Most likely not your first choice for introducing your running-mate to the country!
posted by ericb at 3:46 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I don't know so much about McCain, but I had the overall impression that he is not completely insane. Are we sure James Dobson didn't slip something into his drink? He just seems to be going on recklessly, and it's like he's destroying his credibility among people who don't necessarily agree with him or vote his way, but who have respected him. At this point I can't tell if he is just desperate to win, or desperate to lose.
posted by troybob at 3:47 PM on September 2, 2008


and people still are excited-incredibly excited-about Palin. )

Do they say *why* they're excited, or *what*, specifically, they're excited about?
posted by tristeza at 3:47 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


The very essence of what we are raised to believe as citizens - that we are a meritocracy, that anyone can make it - has been severely tested this election cycle

Um...all the presidents and vice presidents of America. It's been severely tested for decades, really centuries. I'm not sure why all of a sudden Sarah Palin's legitimately questioned job resume is some kind of cause for me to get all weepy about meritocracy in America. Generations, entire families have lived and died without the prospect of, much less the nomination of, much less the election of anybody who looked like them.
posted by cashman at 3:48 PM on September 2, 2008


Yeah -- right. "Country First."

Rove: Palin "Not A Governing Decision But A Campaign Decision" [w/ video].
posted by ericb at 3:48 PM on September 2, 2008


See, this could all have been avoided if he'd gone with Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle instead.

She is a very popular Republican leader in a state dominated by Democrats; she is not currently involved in any major scandals; she's been in office for a term and a half now; she puts Hawaii back into play (hey, Delaware and Alaska were already going to vote for the parties they almost always vote for); she's already traveled abroad a couple of times on diplomatic type trips.

Basically, the only strike against her is that she's pro-choice - after a fashion.

You picked the wrong small state, Senator McCain!
posted by Joey Michaels at 3:51 PM on September 2, 2008


Your husband is a victim of bad information.
Who told him this lie?


My guess is one of the people calling the house looking for McCain signs (they're going like crazy!) or that is excited -- INCREDIBLY EXCITED!!! -- about Palin!
posted by Shepherd at 3:52 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


A candidate has to reach a certain threshold of credibility before it becomes sensible to talk about the issues, don't they? It seems that we are still at the incredulous stage, where most rational observers do not believe Palin is a credible candidate for the vice presidency. Serious questions have been raised about her fitness for this job (she lacks basic experience we expect in vice presidential candidates; she has not articulated any positions at all about the issues you mention; and there is a controversy concerning her ethics that even has members of her own party calling for her head). Until those questions about basic fitness are answered, it doesn't make sense to push the discussion toward the substantive issues.

For example, as an attorney, if someone were to raise serious questions about whether my adversary counsel is licensed to practice law, raising and settling those questions would necessarily precede any action on the substantive legal issues in a case. If I raised the questions about my adversary's licensure status, it would be wrong to say, "No, that's just a distraction, let's move on to the substantive issues of this case." The attorney's status as a licensed attorney has to be established first; similarly, her credibility as next-in-line to the presidency has to be established first.

You (cell divide) are saying we need to be talking about issues, but there are two problems with that: (1) she hasn't made herself available to talk about issues; no media interviews have been granted and she's cancelled her convention appearance, and (2) until she establishes herself as a credible candidate for vice presidency, many people will feel like we have skipped a step. Her credibility as a candidate has to be established first.

If we were to leap ahead, and treat her as if she were credible --- rather than a completely preposterous pick, worth of scorn and ridicule --- we are playing into the Republicans' hands. Then, she can just spout memorized talking points and we're allowing them to shape the terms of the debate. We Democrats need to treat her with the derision she deserves.
posted by jayder at 3:54 PM on September 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


sorry, my last comment was directed to this comment by cell divide.
posted by jayder at 3:56 PM on September 2, 2008


Yeah -- right. "Country First."
To be fair, they never specified "America". They might be talking about Alaska.
posted by Flunkie at 3:56 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


My husband came home and told me Obama's not gonna be spending any more campaign money in NC.

Why, because Palin means he's beaten in the south?

He's going to win NC, with a far superior ground organization. He's within 5 points in every poll I've seen, which is incredible.

And the more of your fundy neighbors who get excited about Palin, the better -- the bigger the blowback when McCain is forced to kick her under the bus, which will be by next week.
posted by fourcheesemac at 3:57 PM on September 2, 2008


You picked the wrong small state, Senator McCain!

there was always that 49th vs. 50th rivalry going (i dunno ;)

but i wonder if lingle is part of their secessionist movement?
posted by kliuless at 4:00 PM on September 2, 2008


I wish you people had vetted Clinton this well back in the day....


As to my husband's info-I think someone in the State party told him that. But sometimes he gets good info-after all, we knew about Palin before I had my first cup of coffee Friday morning.

I suggest we all sit back, relax, and wait till the end of the week before we get our knickers in a knot either way regarding Palin.
posted by konolia at 4:01 PM on September 2, 2008


Can we get some more Mefi conservative voices?

Stunned silence from all 7 of them.

Konolia is the only one with the balls to stand in the shitstorm and spit back at it.

If I were a thinking Republican, no way I'd be admitting it right now, right here.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:02 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


If we were to leap ahead, and treat her as if she were credible --- rather than a completely preposterous pick, worth of scorn and ridicule --- we are playing into the Republicans' hands.

I understand that and you make a strong point, but if she is established as a credible pick, isn't there the opposite effect? If she emerges as strong, likable, and able to defend her positions forcefully and build support among the conservative base, won't focusing on her foibles make the election about personality and not the major issues?
posted by cell divide at 4:03 PM on September 2, 2008


Fourcheesemac, if McCain throws her under the bus at this point, the Republican party will probably totally implode. I'm serious. If he does that he will need to be screened for dementia.


I am not kidding.
posted by konolia at 4:04 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


I wish you people had vetted Clinton this well back in the day....

See, the candidate for president is not "vetted" except by the media and the voters. And you knew *everything* about Clinton's proclivities before election day, so this doesn't make much sense. We knew we were electing a womanizer, and we did.

Anyway, you can sit back and let the chips fall. I'm having too much fun helping knock them over. No time to relax. The GOP is teetering over the void. Keep PUSHING!
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:04 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Scrub, scrub, scrub.

Web site of Palin's church, the Wasilla Assembly of God: "503 Service Unavailable. The server has been placed offline by the operator. Please try again later."
posted by ericb at 4:05 PM on September 2, 2008


Oh, good lord. Chris Matthews just referred to McCain and Palin as "two Teddy Roosevelt types".
posted by Flunkie at 4:05 PM on September 2, 2008


Sarah Palin is Your New Segway

I added "Turkey Dropped from a Helicopter."

And in an ongoing report here on the ground, McCain signs are going like crazy -people call my house looking for them-and people still are excited-incredibly excited-about Palin.
In a shocking development here in San Francisco, all I see is Obama stickers--and people are incredibly excited about Palin, too!

posted by kirkaracha at 4:08 PM on September 2, 2008 [4 favorites]


The Palin Church Video
“As questions have been raised over how thoroughly Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign vetted Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for the V.P. slot, it seems the McCain campaign was unaware of a video -- available online -- in which Palin talks about God's role in U.S. military action overseas, according to a political operative familiar with the situation.

The video, first reported by the liberal blog HuffingtonPost.com, is from a June Palin speech to the graduating class of commission students at Palin's former church in Wasilla, Alaska. While describing her family, Palin told students about her oldest son, 19-year-old Track, who is set to be deployed to Iraq this month with the U.S. Army. She urged students to pray ‘that our leaders -- that our national leaders -- are sending [soldiers] out on a task that is from God.’

She added, ‘That's what we have to make sure that we are praying for: that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan.’

‘It's pretty uncomfortable stuff,’ said the political operative, after watching the video online. ‘It's bad. It's really bad. … It's going to be interesting to see how this plays out.’

In addition to talking about Iraq, Palin also referred to God's role in her work as governor.

‘I can do my part in working really, really hard to get a natural gas pipeline, about a $30 billion project that's going to create a lot of jobs for Alaska. … [but] I think God's will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that,’ she said. ‘I can do my job there in developing our natural resources, in doing things like getting the roads paved and making sure our troopers have their cop cars and their uniforms and their guns, and making sure our public schools are funded. But really that stuff doesn't do any good if the people of Alaska's hearts aren't right with God.’

It wasn't all serious, though. At one point during the address, Palin praised the graduating class as ‘a bunch of cool-looking Christians.’ Then she picked out one student in the crowd and said with a smile, ‘Ben, I don't know you well enough yet, but looking at you, I'm thinking, people are going to interested in Jesus Christ through you because of the way you look - this red-headed Sasquatch for Jesus. You look good!’ The students cheered. ‘Times are really changin'. And with the times that change, looks even change.’

The seven-minute speech is posted on the Web site of Palin's former church, the Wasilla Assembly of God. But, the political operative said, the McCain campaign seems to have had no knowledge of it when Palin was announced as McCain's running mate on Friday.”
posted by ericb at 4:08 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


konolia, precisely.

Damned if he does, doomed if he doesn't. I am looking forward to the "implosion" either way.

So I hope you're not kidding. McCain is taking on water faster than he can bail today. The way I see it, they *have* to ditch her and take the consequences, which will be a few hundred thousand "Christian" conservatives throwing a hissy fit. Otherwise, it's a guaranteed loser with a few million independents.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:10 PM on September 2, 2008


Republican leaning people are pleased as punch with Palin, if for no other reason than it's driven people like daily kos into a frenzy. Like someone said elsewhere, Palin is like a huge internet troll that people can't stop talking about.
posted by garlic at 4:13 PM on September 2, 2008


red-headed Sasquatch for Jesus

100 kinds of awesome. Can I get that saying on a T-shirt?
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 4:13 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


But the man isn't interested in being a megalomaniac, or owning six Ferraris some lobbyist pays for, or being respected by the media or anyone else in the halls of the powerful. He does his work in the House - a big body it's probably very easy to lose your way in - for the people of Cleveland, and for the rest of us, because he...wants...to.

See, that's the thing about Kucinich (he's my congressman and I love him). He lives not too far from us in a modest, lower-middle-class neighborhood. He stands up for what he believes in, he gets excited about public service, he's a great, great guy. No scandals, unless you count landing a majorly good looking younger woman about 8' taller than him. He's not trying to ban books, or fire ex-brother-in-laws, or take a plane home during a high risk pregnancy to give birth in Alaska so his son's citizenship in a future independent Alaskan republic where all citizens get handout checks from Big Oil is assured. He's just...well...awesome.

(And speaking of which, how come only Alaskans get oil dividend checks? as members of the US, exploiting US resources, shouldn't we ALL get a share? Or is Alaska, like, specialer than the rest of us? Norway has the right idea).
posted by bitter-girl.com at 4:14 PM on September 2, 2008 [8 favorites]


The Wasilla Assembly of God took their website offline -- one day too late. Talk about amateur hour -- the McCain campaign apparently had no knowledge of any of this. I can't imagine the backstage drama as it reels and rocks today trying to keep this stuff tamped down.

She's a wacko evangelical. We've had enough of a president who thinks he talks to God and God talks through him. Enough! This is the last gasp of the cave dwellers before we go all 21st century on their asses.
posted by fourcheesemac at 4:15 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Juneau: A Comedy About Running for President...and the Bumps Along the Way.
posted by ericb at 4:18 PM on September 2, 2008


Konolia is the only one with the balls to stand in the shitstorm and spit back at it.

Seriously. I have tremendous admiration for Konolia right now, just for hanging in there. We need more of her backbone around here.
posted by rokusan at 4:25 PM on September 2, 2008 [11 favorites]


konolia writes "Fourcheesemac, if McCain throws her under the bus at this point, the Republican party will probably totally implode. I'm serious. If he does that he will need to be screened for dementia. "

But for years, for decades, we've said presidential candidates should be able to pick their own veeps. You know McCain wanted Joe Lieberman, and only picked Palin after his arm was twisted. And now she's imploding.

Why can't your guy, McCain, pick a veep he's comfortable with and confident in?
posted by orthogonality at 4:36 PM on September 2, 2008


Or is Alaska, like, specialer than the rest of us?

They need people there to help keep the whole thing going, and it's not a place where too many people are able to live for very long. I think that's the purpose behind the subsidy, to keep the population high enough to make it worth living there for the oil company employees.
posted by cell divide at 4:36 PM on September 2, 2008


So I read this by Alan Wolfe:

It may seem like ages ago but during the Clinton administration, conservative traditionalists were everywhere. The nuclear family is sacrosanct. Women should shun the workforce and become full-time moms. Kids should obey their parents and, if they choose not to, discipline, including harsh measures, ought to be applied. Sex outside of marriage is strictly forbidden. Our culture is spinning wildly out of control, and sexual liberation, the worst byproduct of the God-awful 1960s, is the cause. And, by the way, abortion is murder and should be forbidden.

All that is left, if the Palin controversy is any indication, is abortion. Palin's defenders, far from being traditionalists, are moral relativists.


So is this accurate? Is the only thing the socially conservative voter cares about any more the a-word? I know that's not the case with my republican, Catholic mother, but maybe it is the case with the majority?
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 4:37 PM on September 2, 2008


Palin phone number, Social Security number leak in oppo file. (PDF WARNING)
posted by goodnewsfortheinsane at 4:38 PM on September 2, 2008


I did watch the Campbell Brown-Tucker Bounds argument live last night, and the shocking thing wasn't Bounds' inability to answer the question, it was that Campbell Brown was actually doing her job.

It was like Jeremy Paxman discovered the tunnel that led into her head, only was disappointed to find it wasn't John Malkovich.
posted by dw at 5:41 PM on September 2 [4 favorites +] [!]


There is no way that Jeremy Paxman (or John Humphries, aka Jeremy-Paxman-on-radio, with whom I'm more familiar) would have backed off like she did. I was watching that clip thinking, oh my god, the American media might be actually starting to do their jobs -- when she totally caved. "Alright, I'm going to let you have that one," and thus giving legitimacy to Bounds' blathering and all-but-lies (by suggesting but not completely claiming Palin commanded the guard overseas)?

The spirit of journalism is off in a corner being sick right now.

Okay, I shouldn't be so harsh. At least she made an effort. I just wish it had been an effort without capitulation to a feeble defence.
posted by jb at 4:39 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


They need people there to help keep the whole thing going, and it's not a place where too many people are able to live for very long.

I could say the same about certain parts of Ohio, too, but no one's cutting us in on the SE Ohio marijuana trade, or the Lake Erie salt mine.
posted by bitter-girl.com at 4:44 PM on September 2, 2008


And speaking of which, how come only Alaskans get oil dividend checks?

And for a Republican/libertarian leaning state, don't they realize that those checks are pretty much COMMUNISM? I hope they all return them to the oil companies.
posted by TheOnlyCoolTim at 4:44 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Fourcheesemac, if McCain throws her under the bus at this point, the Republican party will probably totally implode. I'm serious. If he does that he will need to be screened for dementia.

You're using "thrown under the bus" incorrectly, but you're right. We know this was a play demanded by the evangelical-fundamentalist wing of the party. We know she wasn't properly vetted because they were so adamant at the last minute for a pro-life veep. And when they got her, they couldn't stop lauding her in every way. And the absolute pillorying she's getting? Well, that's just the Left Wing Media and Liberals! It's Persecution!

The problem, unfortunately, is that she's looking more and more like Alan Keyes. She might just be too far to the right for the GOP's own good. (She's also coming off as ruthless, petty, and mean, which, honestly, is bad. Like she's the cool kid clique enforcer in high school who never grew out of the role.)

But between the Obama = Antichrist ads and the shibboleths the advisors have been slipping in when they can to get the Religious Right listening, they've been pulling out all the stops to try and hang onto that 10% of the evangelical vote they've lost to Obama. Palin is a pander, through and through. If they wanted a pro-lifer with bona fides... Lindsey Graham? Bob Riley, governor of Alabama? Cantor from Virginia was mentioned a few times.

However, they can't replace her unless she has a "dead boy or live girl" problem. Well, they could throw her to the media wolves, mourn her loss at the hands of "the evil liberals," and go with another pro-life option. They're stuck with her.

I think she's worse than Dan Quayle. At least Quayle had 12 years in the House and Senate. At least he had a law degree. At least he had a record. He might have been dense, but he still had more experience than Palin has now. (And we questioned Quayle's experience? How naive we were.)
posted by dw at 4:44 PM on September 2, 2008


That oppo file is from her 2006 Gov opponent, Tony Knowles, it's not new.
posted by empath at 4:45 PM on September 2, 2008


as bookhouse noted above...

There's no way that could be worth the horrible PR of screwing up your first VP pick. No, they (hilariously) mean to ride this one out. :D

politically speaking, i think mccain's gambit (if indeed it was thought out!) worked to the extent that it's helped shore up the base -- if konolia is any indication, however futile :P -- but i'm pretty sure it's lost him independents, esp wrt obama:
We now have a person running for office, who is potentially a heartbeat away from becoming President of the United States, who could potentially send us straight back to medieval times. She stated in a televised debate that she supports the teaching of creationism in schools... Regardless of one's political views, I find it hard to believe the majority of this country support the candidacy of a person with such narrow-minded, backward-looking beliefs. Divisiveness is not what we need at this critical point in the evolution of our society and of the world, especially when challenges to the status quo haven't been higher in generations. Do you think China, India and Russia are moving light-years backwards in their science programs to teach creationism? Do you really think we can continue to be competitive on an increasingly challenging global stage when science is something you learn from the Bible, and not from scholarly texts in biology, anthropology, chemistry and physics? I shudder to think what will happen to our knowledge economy in such a scenario.

I have been reading a fascinating book about Intel's Andy Grove by Richard Tedlow. It traces Mr. Grove's childhood and eventual escape from Hungary in 1956, and the remarkable life he has built since his move to the U.S. Mr. Grove is a man of science, of determination, of massive intellect and is a lifelong learner. He has used his powers to fight both prostate cancer and Parkinson's disease, and was employee #3 and the architect of growth at arguably the most important company to bring us into the PC generation and out towards the Internet generation. I wonder what Governor Palin would think of Mr. Grove's life story and the role of science in his personal and professional development? It is hard to imagine this self-proclaimed "hockey mom" being impressed. Rest assured, I am.

When I see the U.S. through my prism - being whatever you want to be if you work hard enough, inclusive, edgy, aggressive about ensuing our personal freedoms, innovative, caring, focused and fierce under duress, willing to change but without compromising the spirit of our Constitution - it saddens me to see where we find ourselves. Eight years of a fractious, troubled Administration, with the possibility of not more of the same, but perhaps much, much worse...
i think brooks (kinda) gets it:
If McCain is elected, he will... be leading a divided and philosophically exhausted party. There simply aren’t enough Republican experts left to staff an administration, so he will have to throw together a hodgepodge with independents and Democrats...
the logically-challenged need not apply!
posted by kliuless at 4:47 PM on September 2, 2008


So is this accurate?

I think that article is off base and displays a lack of understanding of the average Christian evangelical/charismatic.

We still believe in chastity, in morality, etc. etc. But we also believe in redemption, in restoring those who "fall", and we definitely see no redeeming value in crucifying a young girl who, as we used to say in the old days, "got in trouble."

As I told my own daughter: Okay, you messed up. The important thing is that you are doing the right thing NOW.

She and her hubby celebrated their second anniversary yesterday. They just bought a house. My grandson is healthy and happy. THEY are happy.


See, I am an old fart who remembers that back in the old days, when morality and chastity were taught and expected throughout the old culture, there were still plenty of folks who "messed up." But even those folks agreed with the rest of us that it was best to wait till marriage for sex, it was best for moms to care for children, and so on. We all had something to live up to. Now it seems that people race to see what they can live down to, and in such a culture, it looks-and to a certain measure is-a remarkable thing when people actually take responsibility for their actions.
posted by konolia at 4:52 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Is the only thing the socially conservative voter cares about any more the a-word?

It's like a binary litmus test. Is an embryo / fetus a human or not? It's not half-human. It's not half-elf, either. It's either a human or it's not. If you firmly believe it's a human, how could you possibly support anyone that would allow the killing of a purely innocent human?

To many people, this is a bit more important than, say, tax reform. While you may not think it's smart to do so, it's perfectly logical to discard a candidate for his/her belief on this subject. If that's your deal, thinking anything else is kind of like overlooking a certain someone's actions because he made the trains run on time.

I'm pro-choice and proud of it, but like anyone, my preference for the acceptable abortion rate is zero.
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 4:54 PM on September 2, 2008


It's ALWAYS been accurate.

Sin only matters when it's somebody else. The less like you they are; the less they look, talk, walk, dress, or fuck like you the worse their sins are. Even if you share identical sins.

Support aborting a fetus? SINNER!

Support a war that drops bombs on pregnant women and children? Hero!
posted by tkchrist at 4:54 PM on September 2, 2008 [9 favorites]


And for a Republican/libertarian leaning state, don't they realize that those checks are pretty much COMMUNISM?

To be a good Republican, you have to be able to say the following two sentences together without laughing:

1) "Keep those government flatfoots from Washington out of my hair."
2) "Hurry up with my subsidy check."

Shamelessly stolen from Berke Breathed
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 4:56 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


How does the process work if Palin is thrown out or resigns after the convention? Do the delegates have to re-gather and vote on the new VP pick? Does McCain get to pick? Does Palin get to pick? Does it go to Nancy Pelosi?
posted by troybob at 5:04 PM on September 2, 2008


Boy, the Alaskan Independence movement is spreading in the Republican party. The governor of South Carolina, a moment ago, just said that there's been a lot of vetting done on Palin, first in Alaska, "and now here in the United States".
posted by Flunkie at 5:08 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


1- In the party of Susan Collins, Lynn Martin, Elizabeth Dole, Olympia Snowe, Sandra Day O’Connor, Christine Todd Whitman, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Margaret Spelling, Condoleeza Rice, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Kay Orr, Susan Molinari, and Kay Granger, this was the best they could do? This choice is an insult to the women who broke that glass ceiling and put this lightweight into this position for which she is a bad joke. I think there's going to be a Bradley Effect of Repblican women who say they're voting McCain, and secretly vote for Obama or no one instead.
posted by nax at 5:11 PM on September 2, 2008 [10 favorites]


Dem's replaced their VP post convention, and lost in a landslide. Don't know how the Republican charter would handle it.

Just over two weeks after his nomination, it was revealed that McGovern's running mate, Thomas Eagleton, had received electroshock therapy for clinical depression during the 1960s. Though many people still supported Eagleton's candidacy, an increasing number of influential politicians and columnists questioned his ability to handle the office of Vice President. The resulting negative attention prompted McGovern to accept Eagleton's offer to withdraw from the ticket, replacing him with United States Ambassador to France (and brother in-law of John F. Kennedy) Sargent Shriver. This occurred after McGovern had stated publicly he was still "... behind Eagleton 1000 percent"; reneging on that statement a few days later made McGovern look indecisive. The Eagleton controversy also put the McGovern campaign off message and was speculated at the time to perhaps be a harbinger of what would become McGovern's subsequent landslide loss.[18]
posted by mrzarquon at 5:13 PM on September 2, 2008


How does the process work if Palin is thrown out or resigns after the convention?

Slate: How To Replace a Vice Presidential Nominee
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 5:13 PM on September 2, 2008


Palin slashed funding to teen mothers - that Alaskan socialism is only for some people.
posted by Artw at 5:15 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


meta question: This thread currently has about 185k words. How big a book would that be?
posted by ryanrs at 5:15 PM on September 2, 2008


In the party of ... Jeanne Kirkpatrick

Yeah, but to be fair, they don't have enough mana to cast Raise Dead.

Jeane Jordan Kirkpatrick --- (November 19, 1926 – December 7, 2006)
posted by Cool Papa Bell at 5:16 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


konolia:

See, I am an old fart who remembers that back in the old days, when morality and chastity were taught and expected throughout the old culture, there were still plenty of folks who "messed up." But even those folks agreed with the rest of us that it was best to wait till marriage for sex, it was best for moms to care for children, and so on

You make it sound like girls were "messing up" in spite of chastity-only education rather than because of it. Am I to understand that you, like Palin, couldn't even get abstinence-only to work in your own homes yet want to dictate your failed policies be made national?? The hubris is astounding.

I'd love to see a study done comparing teen pregnancy rates of children born to "abstinence-only" Christian homes with those born to homes with parents who gave them all they needed to know without the medieval moralizing.
posted by callmejay at 5:16 PM on September 2, 2008 [7 favorites]


safari is reporting 224 printed pages. typeset, possibly 100 - 150 pages?
posted by mrzarquon at 5:17 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


konolia, I think that article is off base and displays a lack of understanding of the average Christian evangelical/charismatic.

OK. My experience is with conservative Catholics and mainline Indiana protestants.

... we definitely see no redeeming value in crucifying a young girl who, as we used to say in the old days, "got in trouble."

I get that, and agree. But it's not about the girl, it's about her mother's failure to promote those values in her own actions (wasn't she pregnant before marriage?) or in raising her children, right? Overlooking that seems like moral relativism to me.

As I told my own daughter: Okay, you messed up. The important thing is that you are doing the right thing NOW. ... THEY are happy.

So, "What's important is how you feel?" What? Talk about liberal moral relativism.

See, I am an old fart who remembers that back in the old days, when morality and chastity were taught and expected throughout the old culture, there were still plenty of folks who "messed up." But even those folks agreed with the rest of us that it was best to wait till marriage for sex, it was best for moms to care for children, and so on. We all had something to live up to. Now it seems that people race to see what they can live down to, and in such a culture, it looks-and to a certain measure is-a remarkable thing when people actually take responsibility for their actions.

OK, and? It seems like you're saying the same thing as the article I quoted. "Back in the old days, we believed you should A, B and C but never ever X, Y, or Z. Now, well, never Z and do what makes you happy!"

But like I said, I'm probably mired in a catholic outlook. I don't get how someone who opposes abortions but is practically bubbly about executions is better than someone who feels the opposite. Vote Kang!
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 5:19 PM on September 2, 2008 [2 favorites]


Also the document size, as reported by safari, is 2.9MB, 143k being being scripts, 15.42k being stylesheets, and 14.39k as images
posted by mrzarquon at 5:20 PM on September 2, 2008


Sure, as long as you throw the abortion rates in there as well.

You do forget-I was a teen in the seventies. We had books such as The Joy of Sex readily available to us. I knew as much about the topic at seventeen as I do now. Which is plenty, but I will spare you the details.

The only way to guarantee you don't get pregnant is to not have sex.
posted by konolia at 5:21 PM on September 2, 2008



So, "What's important is how you feel?" What? Talk about liberal moral relativism

Oh, I'm sorry-was I supposed to take her out back and stone her?

Seems like a certain Someone has been quoted as saying, " Go-and sin no more."
posted by konolia at 5:23 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


meta question: This thread currently has about 185k words. How big a book would that be?
About the size of the New Testament. Nowhere near the size of the Old Testament.
posted by Flunkie at 5:25 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Capital punishment is probably not the best solution to pregnancy out of wedlock.
posted by These Premises Are Alarmed at 5:28 PM on September 2, 2008 [3 favorites]


But even those folks agreed with the rest of us that it was best to wait till marriage for sex, it was best for moms to care for children, and so on.

The problem is, not everyone agrees with that. Not then, and not now. And everyone gets to choose for themselves what they want in life and wouldn't it be nice if they had the proper information to do so? I like the modern age far better than this strange fake utopia you describe. It was never perfect, and it was never "agreed upon." Maybe socially pressured, but not everyone agreed.
posted by agregoli at 5:28 PM on September 2, 2008 [5 favorites]


Bless you MeFi. I have spent the whole morning reading this, avoiding doing the laundry and avoiding working on my thesis. For that alone, I thank you all.

This is probably a moot point since it looks like Palin is going to be dumped from the ticket, but -some commentators (on other blogs) have said that she will use the fact her son is going to Iraq as a plus re. concern for troops and knowing about Iraq. I don't buy that, since Biden also has a son deploying to Iraq.

But as I said - moot point now that the Palin VP idea is about to implode.
posted by Megami at 5:28 PM on September 2, 2008


1- In the party of Susan Collins, Lynn Martin, Elizabeth Dole, Olympia Snowe, Sandra Day O’Connor, Christine Todd Whitman, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Margaret Spelling, Condoleeza Rice, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Kay Orr, Susan Molinari, and Kay Granger, this was the best they could do?

No kidding. Can somebody tell me with a straight face that Christine Todd Whitman or Sandra Day O'Connor are less (or worse, EQUALLY) qualified to be VP than some church-lady goober mayor from Alaska?
posted by tkchrist at 5:33 PM on September 2, 2008


In answer about the annual Alaska checks, better known as the PFD. Every Alaskan regardless of age receives a dividend check including infants as long as residency requirements are met. There are no state taxes levied however there are Federal taxes. The PFD came about when oil wealth was placed in stock funds and managed by the state under a Democratic administration. It is joked that Alaska pissed away all of its oil wealth foolishly except for the PFD which a lot of families depend upon for extra funds. I never understood how the Republicans poopoohed such a popular thing from a Democratic administration.
posted by jadepearl at 5:35 PM on September 2, 2008


Palin is not going to be dumped from the ticket.

It ain't gonna happen.
posted by konolia at 5:35 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


185k words would be about 740 pages, paperback. Mid-sized Stephen King book.
posted by cortex at 5:37 PM on September 2, 2008 [1 favorite]


Callmejay brings up an excellent question konolia. Would you change your mind about abstinence-only sex education if it had been shown that more teen pregnancies occured in abstence only families vs families who promote sex education? (BTW, I have no idea if that is true, sorry for push-polling there.)
posted by batou_ at 5:38 PM on September 2, 2008


Oh, I'm sorry-was I supposed to take her out back and stone her?
No, you were (well, your husband was) supposed to charge him fifty shekels.
Seems like a certain Someone has been quoted as saying, " Go-and sin no more."
The "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" story is present in none of the known original